岩性油气藏 ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (5): 46–55.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20240505

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

渤中凹陷渤中A-2区新近系明化镇组岩性油气藏油气运移特征

程焱, 王波, 张铜耀, 齐玉民, 杨纪磊, 郝鹏, 李阔, 王晓东   

  1. 中海油能源发展股份有限公司 工程技术分公司, 天津 300452
  • 收稿日期:2023-09-14 修回日期:2023-09-28 出版日期:2024-09-01 发布日期:2024-09-04
  • 第一作者:程焱（1995—），男，硕士，工程师，主要从事石油实验地质方面的研究工作。地址：（300452）天津市滨海新区海洋高新区中海油服产业园区中海油实验中心。Email：chengyan6@cnooc.com.cn。

Oil and gas migration characteristics of lithologic reservoirs of Neogene Minghuazhen Formation in Bozhong A-2 area，Bozhong Sag

CHENG Yan, WANG Bo, ZHANG Tongyao, QI Yumin, YANG Jilei, HAO Peng, LI Kuo, WANG Xiaodong   

  1. EnerTech-Drilling & Production Co., CNOOC Energy Technology & Services Limited, Tianjin 300452, China
  • Received:2023-09-14 Revised:2023-09-28 Online:2024-09-01 Published:2024-09-04

PDF (PC)

120

摘要： 通过烃源岩特征分析及典型井原油样品的生物标志化合物参数对比，对渤中凹陷西南环带渤中A-2区新近系明下段岩性油气藏的原油来源及其运聚规律进行了研究。研究结果表明：①渤中凹陷西南环带纵向发育东三段、沙一段及沙三段等层段烃源岩，东三段烃源岩具C19TT优势，Ts丰度值较大，C27-C28-C29规则甾烷呈“V”形分布；沙一段烃源岩具C23TT优势，Ts与Tm丰度值相近，γ蜡烷丰度值大，C27-C28-C29规则甾烷呈“L”形分布；沙三段烃源岩具C21TT或C23TT优势，Ts丰度值较大，C27-C28-C29规则甾烷呈“V”形分布，具C27优势。②原油物性参数及气相色谱图差异性分析结果显示，渤中A-2油藏东南井区原油充注能力强于中部井区，C27-C28-C29规则甾烷整体呈“L”形分布，4-甲基甾烷峰值较大。明下段上部原油C19TT/C23TT的值较小，MPI1和MPI2参数均较大，全油碳同位素稍重，显示其油源以沙一段供烃为主、沙三段供烃为辅。③渤中A-2油藏各井的1-甲基菲、9-甲基菲、C29ααS（/S+R），C29ββ/（αα+ββ）、二苯并噻吩系列、QGF指数等参数均呈规律性变化，指示了原油运移路径为经东南向西北运移聚集成藏。原油生物标志化合物对比结果显示，渤中凹陷西南环带深部原油先汇聚至渤中A-4油藏馆陶组，再通过垂向输导至浅层明下段，然后沿横向广覆砂体运移至渤中A-2油藏明下段，从而形成了现今的岩性油气藏。

关键词: 岩性油气藏, 油源对比, 油气运移路径, 沙河街组烃源岩, 碳同位素, 生物标志化合物, 明化镇组, 渤中A-2油藏, 渤中凹陷

Abstract: By analyzing the characteristics of source rocks and comparing the biomarker parameters of crude oil samples from typical wells，the crude oil sources and its migration and accumulation patterns of lithologic reservoirs of the lower Minghuazhen Formation of Neogene in Bozhong A-2 area in the southwest belt of Bozhong Sag were studied. The results show that：（1）The source rocks of the third member of Dongying Formation （E3d3）and the first and third members of Shahejie Formation（E2s1，E2s3）are developed longitudinally in the southwest belt of Bozhong Sag. The source rocks of E3d3 have C19TT predominance，a high Ts abundance value and a “V”-shaped distribution of C27-C28-C29 regular sterane. The source rocks of E2s1 have C23TT predominance， similar Ts and Tm abundance values，a high abundance value of gammacerane and a “L”-shped distribution of C27-C28-C29 regular sterane. The source rocks of E2s3 have C21TT or C23TT predominance，high Ts abundance value，and a “V”-shaped distribution of C27-C28-C29 regular sterane，with C27 predominance.（2）The difference distribution of physical parameters and gas chromatogram of crude oil shows that the filling capacity of crude oil in the southeast well area of Bozhong A-2 reservoir is stronger than that in the middle well area. The C27-C28-C29 regular sterane distributed in a “L” shape and the peak value of 4-methylsteranes is large. In the upper part of the lower Minghuazhen Formation，the C19TT/C23TT is smaller，the MPI1 and MPI2 parameters are larger，total oil has a slightly heavy carbon isotope，indicating that the oil source is mainly supplied by E2s1 and supplemented by E2s3.（3）1-methylphenanthrene，9-methylphenanthrene，C29ααS/（S+R），C29ββ/ αα+ββ），dibenzothiophene series and QGF index parameters change regularly in each well of Bozhong A-2 reservoir，indicating that the crude oil is mainly charged from east to south to northwest. The comparison results of crude oil biomarker show that the deep crude oil in the southwest belt of Bozhong Sag firstly accumulated in Guantao Formation in Bozhong A-4 reservoir，transported vertically to the shallow lower Minghuazhen Formation，and then migrated horizontally along the wide sand bodies to lower Minghuazhen Formation of Bozhong A-2 reservoir，thus forming the current lithologic reservoirs.

Key words: lithologic reservoir, oil-source correlation, hydrocarbon migration pathway, source rocks of Shahejie Formation, carbon isotope, biomarker, Minghuazhen Formation, Bozhong A-2 reservoir, Bozhong Sag

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.1
[1] 徐长贵, 杜晓峰, 庞小军, 等. 渤海南部明化镇组下段源-汇体系及其对大面积岩性油气藏的控制作用[J]. 地质力学学报, 2022, 28(5):728-742. XU Changgui, DU Xiaofeng, PANG Xiaojun, et al. The sourcesink system and its control on large-area lithologic reservoirs of the lower Minghuazhen Formation in the southern Bohai Sea[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 2022, 28(5):728-742.
[2] 薛永安. 渤海海域油气运移"汇聚脊"模式及其对新近系油气成藏的控制[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(9):963-970. XUE Yong'an. The "catchment ridge" model of hydrocarbon migration in Bohai Sea and its control on Neogene hydrocarbon accumulation[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2018, 39(9):963-970.
[3] 周心怀, 王德英, 于海波, 等. 环渤中地区浅层大规模岩性油藏的成藏主控因素与成藏模式[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2022, 49(4):660-669. ZHOU Xinhuai, WANG Deying, YU Haibo, et al. Major controlling factors and hydrocarbon accumulation models of largescale lithologic reservoirs in shallow strata around the Bozhong sag, Bohai Bay Basin, China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2022, 49(4):660-669.
[4] 王德英, 张宏国, 官大勇, 等. 环渤中地区新近系控藏模式与高丰度油藏勘探实践[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(3):273-282. WANG Deying, ZHANG Hongguo, GUAN Dayong, et al. Neogene reservoir-controlling mode and exploration practice of highabundance oil reservoirs in Bozhong Sag and its surrounding area[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(3):273-282.
[5] 薛永安, 许鹏, 汤国民. 渤中凹陷西南环特大型高产油气聚集带的发现与勘探启示[J]. 中国海上油气, 2023, 35(3):1-11. XUE Yong'an, XU Peng, TANG Guomin. Discovery and exploration implications of super-large high-yield oil and gas accumulation zone in the southwest belt of Bozhong Sag[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2023, 35(3):1-11.
[6] 薛永安. 渤海海域垦利6-1油田的发现与浅层勘探思路的重大转变[J]. 中国海上油气, 2021, 33(2):1-12. XUE Yong'an. Discovery of KL6-1 oilfield and great change of shallow strata exploration ideas in Bohai Sea[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2021, 33(2):1-12.
[7] 牛成民, 杨海风, 赵弟江, 等. 渤海海域莱州湾凹陷油气超晚期成藏与油气运移滞后效应[J]. 地球科学, 2022, 47(2):464-478. NIU Chengmin, YANG Haifeng, ZHAO Dijiang, et al. Study on the ultra-late hydrocarbon accumulation and migration lagging effect in Laizhouwan Sag, Bohai Sea[J]. Earth Science, 2022, 47(2):464-478.
[8] 薛永安, 李慧勇, 许鹏, 等. 渤海海域中生界覆盖型潜山成藏认识与渤中13-2大油田发现[J]. 中国海上油气, 2021, 33(1):13-22. XUE Yong'an, LI Huiyong, XU Peng, et al. Recognition of oil and gas accumulation of Mesozoic covered buried hills in Bohai Sea area and the discovery of BZ 13-2 Oilfield[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2021, 33(1):13-22.
[9] 文华国, 梁金同, 周刚, 等. 四川盆地及周缘寒武系洗象池组层序-岩相古地理演化与天然气有利勘探区带[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(2):1-16. WEN Huaguo, LIANG Jintong, ZHOU Gang, et al. Sequencebased lithofacies paleogeography and favorable natural gas exploration areas of Cambrian Xixiangchi Formation in Sichuan Basin and its periphery[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(2):1-16.
[10] 吴芬婷, 谢小敏, 徐耀辉, 等. 塔斯马尼亚油页岩生烃模拟排出油与滞留油地球化学对比Ⅱ:分子地球化学特征[J]. 石油实验地质, 2022, 44(2):314-323. WU Fenting, XIE Xiaomin, XU Yaohui, et al. A comparative on the geochemical characteristics of expelled and retained oil from hydrocarbon generation simulation of Australian Tasmanian oil shale Ⅱ:Molecular geochemical characteristics[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2022, 44(2):314-323.
[11] 邓美玲, 王宁, 李新琦, 等. 渤海莱州湾凹陷中部古近系沙三段烃源岩地球化学特征及沉积环境[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(1):49-62. DENG Meiling, WANG Ning, LI Xinqi, et al. Geochemical characteristics and sedimentary environment of source rocks of the third member of Paleogene Shahejie Formation in central Laizhouwan Sag, Bohai Sea[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(1):49-62.
[12] 朱扬明, 郝芳, 邹华耀, 等. 川北中、下侏罗统烃源岩重排藿烷组成变化与油源对比[J]. 沉积学报, 2022, 40(4):1137-1150. ZHU Yangming, HAO Fang, ZOU Huayao, et al. Compositional variations and oil-source implication of rearranged hopanes from the Middle-Lower Jurassic source rocks in the northern Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2022, 40(4):1137-1150.
[13] 李二庭, 米巨磊, 张宇, 等. 准噶尔盆地东道海子凹陷二叠系平地泉组烃源岩特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1):88-97. LI Erting, MI Julei, ZHANG Yu, et al. Source rock characteristics of Permian Pingdiquan Formation in Dongdaohaizi sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(1):88-97.
[14] 张运波, 王明健, 杜治利, 等. 准噶尔盆地南缘四棵树凹陷主力烃源岩及油源对比[J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2020, 36(12):39-48. ZHANG Yunbo, WANG Mingjian, DU Zhili, et al. Main oil source rocks and oil-source correlation in the Sikeshu sag, the southernmargin of Junggar Basin[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2020, 36(12):39-48.
[15] 赵靖舟, 孟选刚, 韩载华. 近源成藏——来自鄂尔多斯盆地延长组湖盆东部"边缘"延长组6段原油的地球化学证据[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(12):1513-1526. ZHAO Jingzhou, MENG Xuangang, HAN Zaihua. Near-source hydrocarbon accumulation:Geochemical evidence of lacustrine crude oil from the member 6 of Yanchang Formation, eastern margin of Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(12):1513-1526.
[16] 赵汉卿, 温慧芸, 穆朋飞, 等. 垦利A油田沙三上段近源辫状河三角洲沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(3):37-44. ZHAO Hanqing, WEN Huiyun, MU Pengfei, et al. Sedimentary characteristics of near-source braided river delta of the upper third member of Shahejie Formation in Kenli A oilfield[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(3):37-44.
[17] 朱康乐, 高岗, 杨光达, 等. 辽河坳陷清水洼陷古近系沙河街组深层烃源岩特征及油气成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3):146-157. ZHU Kangle, GAO Gang, YANG Guangda, et al. Characteristics of deep source rocks and hydrocarbon accumulation model of Paleogene Shahejie Formation in Qingshui subsag, Liaohe Depression[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(3):146-157.
[18] 刘飞, 朱钢添, 何生, 等. 渤海湾盆地惠民凹陷临南洼陷沙河街组原油地球化学特征及油源对比[J]. 石油实验地质, 2019, 41(6):855-864. LIU Fei, ZHU Gangtian, HE Sheng, et al. Geochemical characteristics of crude oil and oil-source correlation of Shehejie Formation in Linnan sub-sag, Huimin Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2019, 41(6):855-864.
[19] 郝鹏, 臧春艳, 王波, 等. 渤中凹陷西次洼烃源岩地球化学特征及油源对比[J]. 断块油气田, 2019, 26(6):681-686. HAO Peng, ZANG Chunyan, WANG Bo, et al. Geochemical characteristics of source rocks and oil-source correlation in western sub-sag of Bozhong sag[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2019, 26(6):681-686.
[20] 袁媛, 杜克锋, 葛云锦, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地甘泉-富县地区长7烃源岩地球化学特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(1):39-45. YUAN Yuan, DU Kefeng, GE Yunjin, et al. Geochemistry of hydrocarbon source rocks of Chang 7 in Ganquan-Fuxian area, Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(1):39-45.
[21] 路清华, 邵志兵, 贾存善, 等. 塔里木盆地玉北地区奥陶系原油成因特征分析[J]. 石油实验地质, 2013, 35(3):320-324. LU Qinghua, SHAO Zhibing, JIA Cunshan, et al. Genesis features of crude oil in Ordovician, Yubei area, Tarim Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2013, 35(3):320-324.
[22] 杨东升, 刘志峰, 吴斌, 等. 渤海海域辽东凸起南段潜山构造演化及其对油气成藏的控制[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2022, 27(3):78-87. YANG Dongsheng, LIU Zhifeng, WU Bin, et al. Tectonic evolution and its control on hydrocarbon accumulation of buried hill in the south section of Liaodong Bulge, Bohai Sea[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2022, 27(3):78-87.
[23] 阳宏, 刘成林, 王飞龙, 等. 渤中凹陷东营组古沉积环境及烃源岩发育模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(6):81-92. YANG Hong, LIU Chenglin, WANG Feilong, et al. Paleoenvironment and development model of source rocks of Dongying Formation in Bozhong Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(6):81-92.
[1] 王义凤, 田继先, 李剑, 乔桐, 刘成林, 张景坤, 沙威, 沈晓双. 玛湖凹陷西南地区二叠系油气藏相态类型及凝析油气地球化学特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 149-159.
[2] 易珍丽, 石放, 尹太举, 李斌, 李猛, 刘柳, 王铸坤, 余烨. 塔里木盆地哈拉哈塘—哈得地区中生界物源转换及沉积充填响应[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 56-66.
[3] 张磊, 李莎, 罗波波, 吕伯强, 谢敏, 陈新平, 陈冬霞, 邓彩云. 东濮凹陷北部古近系沙三段超压岩性油气藏成藏机理[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 57-70.
[4] 朱康乐, 高岗, 杨光达, 张东伟, 张莉莉, 朱毅秀, 李婧. 辽河坳陷清水洼陷古近系沙河街组深层烃源岩特征及油气成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 146-157.
[5] 洪国良, 王红军, 祝厚勤, 白振华, 王雯雯. 南苏门答腊盆地J区块中新统Gumai组岩性油气藏成藏条件及有利区带[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 138-146.
[6] 王雪柯, 王震, 计智锋, 尹微, 姜仁, 侯珏, 张艺琼. 滨里海盆地东缘石炭系盐下碳酸盐岩油气藏成藏规律与勘探技术[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 54-62.
[7] 李恒萱, 温志新, 宋成鹏, 刘祚冬, 季天愚, 沈一平, 耿珂. 塞内加尔盆地演化过程与岩性油气藏勘探前景[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 45-53.
[8] 夏明军, 邵新军, 杨桦, 王忠生, 李之宇, 张超前, 原瑞娥, 法贵方. 海外岩性油气藏储量分类分级方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 37-44.
[9] 刘计国, 周鸿璞, 秦雁群, 邹荃, 郑凤云, 李早红, 肖高杰. 非洲Muglad盆地Fula凹陷白垩系AG组岩性油气藏勘探潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 82-91.
[10] 聂礼尚, 马静辉, 唐小飞, 杨智, 张婉金, 李鸿蕊. 准噶尔盆地东部帐篷沟地区中新生代构造事件及其油气地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 81-91.
[11] 李国欣, 石亚军, 张永庶, 陈琰, 张国卿, 雷涛. 柴达木盆地油气勘探、地质认识新进展及重要启示[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 1-18.
[12] 任梦怡, 胡光义, 范廷恩, 范洪军. 秦皇岛32-6油田北区新近系明化镇组下段复合砂体构型及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 141-151.
[13] 周东红, 谭辉煌, 张生强. 渤海海域垦利6-1油田新近系复合河道砂体地震描述技术[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(4): 13-21.
[14] 王茂桢, 吴奎, 郭涛, 惠冠洲, 郝轶伟. 辽东凹陷东南缘古近系沙二段储层特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(4): 66-78.
[15] 何玉, 周星, 李少轩, 丁洪波. 渤海湾盆地渤中凹陷古近系地层超压成因及测井响应特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(3): 60-69.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 庞雄奇, 陈冬霞, 张　俊. 隐蔽油气藏的概念与分类及其在实际应用中需要注意的问题[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 1 -8 .
[2] 魏钦廉, 郑荣才, 肖玲, 王成玉, 牛小兵. 鄂尔多斯盆地吴旗地区长6 储层特征及影响因素分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 45 -50 .
[3] 杨秋莲, 李爱琴, 孙燕妮, 崔攀峰. 超低渗储层分类方法探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 51 -56 .
[4] 张杰, 赵玉华. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组地震层序地层研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 71 -74 .
[5] 雷卞军，张吉，王彩丽，王晓蓉，李世临，刘斌. 高分辨率层序地层对微相和储层的控制作者用——以靖边气田统5井区马五段上部为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 1 -7 .
[6] 杨杰，卫平生，李相博. 石油地震地质学的基本概念、内容和研究方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 1 -6 .
[7] 杨占龙, 张正刚, 陈启林, 郭精义,沙雪梅, 刘文粟. 利用地震信息评价陆相盆地岩性圈闭的关键点分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 57 -63 .
[8] 旷红伟，高振中，王正允，王晓光. 一种独特的隐蔽油藏——夏9井区成岩圈闭油藏成因分析及其对勘探的启迪[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 8 -14 .
[9] 李国军, 郑荣才,唐玉林,汪洋,唐楷. 川东北地区飞仙关组层序- 岩相古地理特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 64 -70 .
[10] 代黎明, 李建平, 周心怀, 崔忠国, 程建春. 渤海海域新近系浅水三角洲沉积体系分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 75 -81 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发