岩性油气藏 ›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2): 139–145.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20180215

• 油气田开发 • 上一篇    下一篇

低渗透油藏CO2驱中后期提效方法研究

马力1, 欧阳传湘1, 谭钲扬1, 王长权1, 宋岩2, 林飞3   

  1. 1. 长江大学 石油工程学院, 武汉 430100;
    2. 中国石油吉林油田分公司 二氧化碳开发公司, 吉林 松原 138000;
    3. 中国石化西南油气分公司 采气一厂, 成都 610000
  • 收稿日期:2017-11-03 修回日期:2018-01-12 出版日期:2018-03-21 发布日期:2018-03-21
  • 作者简介:马力(1993-),男,长江大学在读硕士研究生,研究方向为油气田开发。地址:(430100)湖北省武汉市蔡甸区大学路特1号长江大学石油工程学院。Email:1872432270@qq.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目“高温高压CO2-原油-地层水三相相平衡溶解度规律”（编号：51404037）资助

Efficiency improvement of CO2 flooding in middle and later stage for low permeability reservoirs

MA Li1, OUYANG Chuanxiang1, TAN Zhengyang1, WANG Changquan1, SONG Yan2, LIN Fei3   

  1. 1. College of Petroleum Engineering, Yangtze University, Wuhan 430100, China;
    2. PetroChina Jilin Oilfield Company, Songyuan 138000, Jilin, China;
    3. No.1 Gas Production Plant, Sinopec Southwest Oil/Gas Company, Chengdu 610000, China
  • Received:2017-11-03 Revised:2018-01-12 Online:2018-03-21 Published:2018-03-21

PDF (PC)

523

摘要： 为了解决低渗透油藏CO2开发中后期因方向性气窜造成的开井时率低、整体开发效果差及存在安全隐患等问题，通过采用数值模拟和室内实验研究相结合的方法，对防控气窜、保障油井生产时率等技术方法展开了深入研究。结果表明：相对于周期注气、轮注轮采、连续注气等方式，水气交替方式CO2气体波及较均匀，提高采收率效果更佳；月度CO2注采比为1.7～1.8时，能同时兼顾保持混相能力和防止气窜，提高降水增油效果；针对油井的气窜特征，制定不同的流压控制标准，可最大程度地发挥CO2驱的作用；通过周期采油方式来调整压力场变化，既可增加油气接触频率而促进混相，又可扩大CO2波及体积，且一类见气井的周期采油效果要好于三类见气井的周期采油效果以及连续采油方式的采油效果；通过调整注采比控制合理生产压差，安装井口控套阀和设置井口单井罐定期泄压等措施，有效地保障了安全生产。研究结果可为吉林油田及国内其他同类地区开展CO2驱试验与推广提供参考。

关键词: AVO技术, Zoeppritz方程, 近似解, 正演模拟

Abstract: In order to solve the problems of low opening rate caused by directional gas channeling in the middle and later stages of CO2 flooding development in low permeability reservoirs, poor overall development results and potential safety issues, numerical simulation and laboratory experiments were used to analyze the effects of anti-controlled gas channeling, to ensure the production rate of oil wells and other technical methods. The results show that the CO2 of water-gas alternating is more uniform and the oil recovery efficiency is better than that of gas injection, wheel injection and continuous gas injection. When the monthly CO2 injection-production ratio is 1.7 to 1.8, it can simultaneously maintain the mixing capacity and prevent gas channeling, so as to decrease water cut and increase oil production. In view of gas channeling characteristics of oil well, different flow pressure control standards were formulated to maximize the CO2 flooding effect. The pressure field changes can be adjusted by periodic oil recovery, which can increase the frequency of oil and gas contact to promote mixed phase and expand the volume of CO2. The periodic oil recovery effect of typeⅠgas wells is better than that of type Ⅲ gas wells and the continuous oil recovery. The safety production is effectively guaranteed by adjusting the injection production ratio and controlling the reasonable production pressure difference, installing the wellhead control valve and setting up wellhead single well tank regular pressure relief. The results can provide technical reference for the development of CO2 flooding test and promotion in Jilin Oilfield and the same kind of oil reservoirs in China.

Key words: AVO technology, Zoeppritz equation, approximate solution, forward modeling

中图分类号: 

  • TE38
[1] 杨红, 王宏, 南宇峰, 等.油藏CO2驱油提高采收率适宜性评价. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(3):140-146. YANG H, WANG H, NAN Y F, et al. The evaluation of the suitability of CO2 flooding in oil reservoirs. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(3):140-146.
[2] 李友全, 孟凡坤, 阎燕, 等.考虑流体非均质性的低渗透油藏CO2驱试井分析.岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(4):106-112. LI Y Q, MENG F K, YAN Y, et al. Consider the heterogeneity of low permeable reservoir fluid CO2 flooding well test analysis. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(4):106-112.
[3] 郭平, 许清华, 孙振, 等.天然气藏CO2驱及地质埋存技术研究进展.岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(3):6-11. GUO P, XU Q H, SUN Z, et al. Progress in research on the technology of CO2 flooding and geological storage in natural gas reservoirs. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(3):6-11.
[4] 李军, 张军华, 谭明友, 等.CO2驱油及其地震监测技术的国内外研究现状.岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(1):128-134. LI J, ZHANG J H, TAN M Y, et al. Current research status of CO2 flooding and seismic monitoring technology. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(1):128-134.
[5] 黄春霞, 汤瑞佳, 余华贵, 等.高压悬滴法测定CO2-原油最小混相压力.岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(1):127-130. HUANG C X, TANG R J, YU H G, et al. Determination of the minimum mixing pressure of CO2 and crude oil by high pressure drop method. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2015, 27(1):127-130.
[6] 李剑, 段景杰, 姚振杰, 等.低渗透油藏水驱后注CO2驱提高采收率影响因素分析.非常规油气, 2017, 4(6):45-52. LI J, DUAN J J, YAO Z J, et al. Analysis of influencing factors of enhanced oil recovery after CO2 flooding in low permeability reservoirs. Unregulated Oil and Gas, 2017, 4(6):45-52.
[7] 陈祖华, 汤勇, 王海妹, 等.CO2驱开发后期防气窜综合治理方法研究.岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(5):102-106. CHEN Z H, TANG Y, WANG H M, et al. Research on the method of comprehensive controlof anti-gas channeling in the late stage of CO2 flooding. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2014, 26(5):102-106.
[8] 周宇, 王锐, 苟斐斐, 等. 高含水油藏CO2驱油机理. 石油学报, 2016, 37(增刊1):143-150. ZHOU Y, WANG R, GOU F F, et al. Mechanism of CO2 flooding in high water cut reservoirs. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(Suppl 1):143-150.
[9] 王艳, 李伟峰, 贾自力, 等.乔家洼油田长6油藏注CO2驱开发实践与效果分析. 非常规油气, 2016, 3(3):75-79. WANG Y, LI W F, JIA Z L, et al. Development and effect analysis of CO2 flooding in Chang 6 reservoir of Qiaojiawa Oilfield. Unconventional Oil and Gas, 2016, 3(3):75-79.
[10] 秦积舜, 韩海水, 刘晓蕾.美国CO2驱油技术应用及启示.石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42(2):209-216. QIN J S, HAN H S, LIU X L. Application and inspiration of CO2 flooding technology in the United States. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(2):209-216.
[11] 汤瑞佳, 王贺谊, 余华贵, 等.水气交替注入对CO2驱油效果的影响.断块油气田, 2016, 23(3):358-362. TANG R J, WANG H Y, YU H G, et al. Effects of alternate injection of water vapor on the effects of CO2 flooding. Fault Block Oil and Gas Field, 2016, 23(3):358-362.
[12] 张本艳, 党文斌, 王少朋, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地红河油田长8储层致密砂岩油藏注CO2提高采收率. 石油与天然气地质, 2016, 37(2):272-275. ZHANG B Y, DANG W B, WANG S P, et al. Evaluation of CO2 recovery in tight sandstone reservoir of Chang 8 reservoir in Honghe Oilfield, Ordos Basin. Petroleum and Natural Gas Geology, 2016, 37(2):272-275.
[13] 吕成远, 王锐, 崔茂蕾, 等.高含水条件下CO2混相驱替实验. 石油学报, 2017, 38(11):1293-1298. LYU C Y, WANG R, CUI M L, et al. Experimental study on CO2 mixed-phase displacement under high water conditions. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2017, 38(11):1293-1298.
[14] 牛保伦.超临界CO2/水交替微观驱油特征研究.科学技术与工程, 2017, 17(25):51-56. NIU B L. Study on the characteristics of the supercritical CO2/water exchange microscopic oil displacement. Science Technology and Engineering, 2017, 17(25):51-56.
[15] 张绍辉, 王凯, 王玲, 等.CO2驱注采工艺的应用与发展.石油钻采工艺, 2016, 38(6):869-875. ZHANG S H, WANG K, WANG L, et al. Application and development of CO2 flooding and injection mining technology. Oil Drilling and Production Technology, 2016, 38(6):869-875.
[16] 刘华, 李相方, 李朋, 等.特低渗非均质油藏CO2驱注气速度对采出程度的影响.石油钻采工艺, 2016, 38(1):105-109. LIU H, LI X F, LI P, et al. Effect of CO2 flooding rate on recovery degree in ultra-low permeability heterogeneous reservoir. Petroleum Drilling & Production Technology, 2016, 38(1):105-109.
[17] 冯文彦.超临界凝析气藏开发后期注CO2提高采收率——以北部湾盆地福山凹陷莲4断块为例. 天然气工业, 2016, 36(7):57-62. FENG W Y. CO2 enhanced oil recovery in late development of supercritical condensate gas reservoir:a case study of Lian 4 block in the Fukuya Depression, Beibu Gulf Basin. Natural Gas Industry, 2016, 36(7):57-62.
[18] ESHIET K I, SHENG Y. Carbon dioxide injection and associated hydraulic fracturing of reservoir formations. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2014, 72(4):1011-1024.
[19] 史云清, 贾英, 潘伟义, 等.低渗致密气藏注超临界CO2驱替机理.石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(3):610-616. SHI Y Q, JIA Y, PAN W Y, et al. Supercritical CO2 flooding mechanism in low permeability and dense gas reservoir. Petroleum and Natural Gas Geology, 2017, 38(3):610-616.
[20] 熊霄. 气水交替改善CO2驱开发效果与应用.长江大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 13(16):35-37. XIONG X. The effect and application of the alternation of gas and water in the development of CO2 flooding. Journal of Yangtze University(Natural Science Edition), 2016, 13(16):35-37.
[21] 王芳, 罗辉, 任玉飞, 等. 降低CO2驱混相压力的发展现状.石油化工高等学校学报, 2015, 28(6):93-97. WANG F, LUO H, REN Y F, et al. Preparation of the development of mixed-pressure of CO2 flooding. Journal of Petrochemical Universities, 2015, 28(6):93-97.
[22] 李南, 田冀, 谭先红, 等.低渗透油藏CO2驱微观波及特征.断块油气田, 2015, 22(2):237-239. LI N, TIAN J, TAN X H, et al. Microscopic wave characteristics of CO2 flooding in low permeability reservoirs. Fault Block Oil and Gas Field, 2015, 22(2):237-239.
[23] 杨红, 余华贵, 黄春霞, 等.低渗油藏水驱后CO2驱潜力评价及注入参数优化.断块油气田, 2015, 22(2):240-244. YANG H, YU H G, HUANG C X, et al. Evaluation of CO2 flooding potential and optimization of injection parameters after waterflooding in low permeability reservoirs. Journal of Fault Block Oil and Gas Field, 2015, 22(2):240-244.
[24] 杨大庆, 江绍静, 尚庆华, 等.注气压力对特低渗透油藏CO2驱气窜的影响规律研究.钻采工艺, 2014, 37(4):63-65. YANG D Q, JIANG S J, SHANG Q H, et al. Study on influence of gas injection pressure on CO2 flooding in ultra-low permeability reservoirs. Drilling & Production Technology, 2014, 37(4):63-65.
[1] 何康, 张鹏志, 周军良, 甘立琴, 舒晓. 复合曲流带内部构型界面识别新方法及其应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4): 126-135.
[2] 李新豫, 张静, 包世海, 张连群, 朱其亮, 闫海军, 陈胜. 川中地区须二段气藏地震预测陷阱分析及对策——以龙女寺区块为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(1): 120-127.
[3] 王伟, 吴奎, 何京, 张金辉, 沈洪涛. 锦州25-1油田优质储层地震响应特征与定量预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(3): 100-111.
[4] 王秀姣, 黄家强, 姜仁, 曾庆才. 不同含气砂岩的AVO响应类型及其近似式误差分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(5): 120-126.
[5] 邓帅, 刘学伟, 王祥春. 上覆水平界面对目的层地震波振幅的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(3): 118-125.
[6] 张京思，揣媛媛，边立恩. 正演模拟技术在渤海油田 X 井区砂体连通性研究中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(3): 127-132.
[7] 陈可洋. 各向异性弹性介质方向行波波场分离正演数值模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(5): 91-96.
[8] 陈可洋，陈树民，李来林，吴清岭，范兴才，刘振宽. 地震波动方程方向行波波场分离正演数值模拟与逆时成像[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(4): 130-136.
[9] 李胜军，刘伟方，高建虎. 正演模拟技术在碳酸盐岩溶洞响应特征研究中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(4): 106-109.
[10] 撒利明，姚逢昌，狄帮让，姚姚. 缝洞型储层地震响应特征与识别方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(1): 23-28.
[11] 孙东，王宏斌，雍学善，张虎权，高建虎，董瑞霞. 直径40 m 溶洞距灰岩顶界面不同距离时的地震响应[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(1): 94-97.
[12] 胡晓丽，谭大龙. 孔隙形状对AVO 响应影响的研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(3): 114-117.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨秋莲, 李爱琴, 孙燕妮, 崔攀峰. 超低渗储层分类方法探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 51 -56 .
[2] 张杰, 赵玉华. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组地震层序地层研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 71 -74 .
[3] 杨占龙, 张正刚, 陈启林, 郭精义,沙雪梅, 刘文粟. 利用地震信息评价陆相盆地岩性圈闭的关键点分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 57 -63 .
[4] 朱小燕, 李爱琴, 段晓晨, 田随良, 刘美荣. 镇北油田延长组长3 油层组精细地层划分与对比[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 82 -86 .
[5] 方朝合, 王义凤, 郑德温, 葛稚新. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系烃源岩显微组分分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 87 -90 .
[6] 韩春元，赵贤正，金凤鸣，王权，李先平，王素卿. 二连盆地地层岩性油藏“多元控砂—四元成藏—主元富集”与勘探实践（IV）——勘探实践[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 15 -20 .
[7] 戴朝成，郑荣才，文华国，张小兵. 辽东湾盆地旅大地区古近系层序—岩相古地理编图[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 39 -46 .
[8] 尹艳树，张尚峰，尹太举. 钟市油田潜江组含盐层系高分辨率层序地层格架及砂体分布规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 53 -58 .
[9] 石雪峰，杜海峰. 姬塬地区长3—长4+5油层组沉积相研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 59 -63 .
[10] 严世邦，胡望水，李瑞升，关键，李涛，聂晓红. 准噶尔盆地红车断裂带同生逆冲断裂特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 64 -68 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发