锦州25-1油田优质储层地震响应特征与定量预测

doi:10.12108/yxyqc.20180312

岩性油气藏 ›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 100–111.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20180312

锦州25-1油田优质储层地震响应特征与定量预测

王伟, 吴奎, 何京, 张金辉, 沈洪涛

中海石油(中国)有限公司天津分公司渤海石油研究院, 天津 300459

收稿日期:2017-12-21 修回日期:2018-02-10 出版日期:2018-05-21 发布日期:2018-05-21
作者简介:王伟(1983-),男,硕士,工程师,主要从事构造解释及储层预测等方面的研究工作。地址:(300459)天津市滨海新区海川路2121号渤海石油管理局大厦B座1006室。Email:114786240@qq.com。
基金资助:
“十二五”国家重大科技专项“近海隐蔽油气藏勘探技术”（编号：2011ZX05023-002）资助

Seismic response characteristics and quantitative prediction of high quality reservoirs in Jinzhou 25-1 oilfield

WANG Wei, WU Kui, HE Jing, ZHANG Jinhui, SHEN Hongtao

Bohai Oil Research Institute, Tianjin Branch of CNOOC Ltd., Tianjin 300459, China

Received:2017-12-21 Revised:2018-02-10 Online:2018-05-21 Published:2018-05-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 渤海湾北部锦州25-1油田及外围区主力含油层系沙二段油气勘探的关键是寻找优质储层。通过地震响应特征分析、井震正演模拟及敏感属性提取，定性刻画出优质储层的地震响应特征及其分布范围；创新应用“叠前同时反演+岩相流体概率分析”组合技术，得到研究区沙二段砂岩储层的概率体；结合25-1油田21口探井资料进行储层厚度及孔隙度与砂岩概率的相关性分析，通过设置阈值，定量预测出了厚度大于50 m、孔隙度大于20%的优质储层发育区。研究成果为锦州25-1油田及其围区的滚动勘探与井位设计提供了理论依据，研究思路为预测辽西北洼其他区域沙二段优质储层提供了方法借鉴。

关键词: 多点地质统计学, 训练图像, SNESIM 方法, 变差函数, 冲积扇, 构型

Abstract: To find high-quality reservoirs is the key for oil and gas exploration in main oil-bearing strata of the second member of Shahejie Formation in Jinzhou 25-1 oilfield and its surrounding areas in northern Bohai Bay. The seismic response characteristic analysis, well seismic forward modeling and sensitive attribute extraction were applied to qualitatively depict the seismic response characteristics and distribution range of high quality reservoirs. The combined technique of"prestack simultaneous inversion and lithofacies fluid probability analysis" was used to obtain the probability body of sandstone reservoir in the second member of Shahejie Formation in the study area. Based on the data from 21 wells in Jinzhou 25-1 oilfield, the correlation between reservoir thickness, porosity and sandstone probability was analyzed. By setting threshold, high quality reservoir development zones with thickness greater than 50 m and porosity greater than 20% were quantitatively predicted. The research results could provide a theoretical basis for the progressive exploration and well location design of Jinzhou 25-1 oilfield and its surrounding areas. The research ideas could provide a reference for high quality reservoir prediction of the second member of Shahejie Formation in other areas of western Liaoning.

Key words: multiple-point geostatistics, training image, SNESIM method, variogram, alluvial fan, structure

中图分类号:

TE122

王伟, 吴奎, 何京, 张金辉, 沈洪涛. 锦州25-1油田优质储层地震响应特征与定量预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(3): 100–111.

WANG Wei, WU Kui, HE Jing, ZHANG Jinhui, SHEN Hongtao. Seismic response characteristics and quantitative prediction of high quality reservoirs in Jinzhou 25-1 oilfield[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(3): 100–111.

参考文献

[1] MUKERJI T, JØTSTAD A, MAYKO G, et al. Applying statistical rock physics and seismic inversions to map lithofacies and pore fluid probabilities in a North Sea reservoir. The 68th SEG Annual Meeting, 1998:894-897.
[2] AVSETH P, MUKERJI T, MAYKO G, et al. Statistical discrimination of lithofacies from prestack seismic data constrained by well log rock physics:Application to a North Sea turbidite system. The 68 thSEG Annual Meeting, 1998:890-893.
[3] CONNOLLY P. Elastic impedance. The Leading Edge, 1999, 18(4):438-452.
[4] HAMPSON D P, RUSSELL B H, BANKHEAD B. Simultaneous inversion of pre-stack seismic data. The 75 th SEG Annual Meeting, 2005:1633-1637.
[5] SIMMONS J L, BACKUS M M. Waveform-based AVO inversion and AVO prediction-error. Geophysics, 1996, 61(6):1575-1588.
[6] BULAND A, OMRE H. Bayesian linearized AVO inversion. Geophysics, 2003, 68(1):185-198.
[7] BACHRACH R. Joint estimation of porosity and saturation using stochastic rock-physics modeling. Geophysics, 2006, 71(5):O53-O63.
[8] SPIKES K, MUKERJI T, DVORKIN J, et al. Probabilistic seismic inversion based on rock-physics models. Geophysics, 2007, 72(5):R87-R97.
[9] SAMS M, SAUSSUS D. Uncertainty of estimating lithology probability from deterministic inversion. The 79 th SEG Annual Meeting, 2009:1790-1794.
[10] SAMS M, SAUSSUS D. Comparison of lithology and net pay uncertainty between deterministic and geostatistical inversion workflows. First Break, 2010, 28(2):35-44.
[11] 甘利灯, 赵邦六, 杜文辉, 等.弹性阻抗在岩性与流体预测中的潜力分析.石油物探, 2005, 44(5):504-508. GAN L D, ZHAO B L, DU W H, et al. The potential anglysis of elastic impedance in the lithology and fluid prediction. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2005, 44(5):504-508.
[12] 郭伟, 何顺利, 邓继新.岩石物理在浊积岩储层岩性与气水识别中的运用.勘探地球物理进展, 2010, 33(5):363-371. GUO W, HE S L, DENG J X. Application of rock physics in lithology discrimination and fluid detection of turbidite reservoir. Progress in Exploration Geophysics, 2010, 33(5):363-371.
[13] 晏信飞, 曹宏, 姚逢昌, 等.致密砂岩储层贝叶斯岩性判别与孔隙流体检测.石油地球物理勘探, 2012, 47(6):945-949. YAN X F, CAO H, YAO F C, et al. Bayesian lithofacies discrimination and pore fluid detection in tight sandstone reservoirs. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2012, 47(6):945-949.
[14] 胡华锋, 印兴耀, 吴国忱.基于贝叶斯分类的储层物性参数联合反演方法.石油物探, 2012, 51(3):225-231. HU H F, YIN X Y, WU G C. Joint inversion of petrophysical parameters based on Bayesian classification. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2012, 51(3):225-231.
[15] 黄饶, 刘志斌.叠前同时反演在砂岩油藏预测中的应用.地球物理学进展, 2013, 28(1):380-386. HUANG R, LIU Z B. Application of prestack simultaneous inversion in sandstone oil reservoir prediction. Progress in Geophysics, 2013, 28(1):380-386.
[16] 洪忠, 张猛刚, 朱筱敏.基于岩石物理的致密碎屑岩气藏岩性及流体概率预测.石油物探, 2015, 54(6):735-744. HONG Z, ZHANG M G, ZHU X M. Prediction on lithology and fluid probabilities of tight clastic gas reservoir based on rock physics. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2015, 54(6):735-744.
[17] 徐长贵, 周心怀, 邓津辉.渤海锦州25-1大型轻质油气田的发现与启示.中国石油勘探, 2010(1):34-38. XU C G, ZHOU X H, DENG J H. Discovery of large-scale Jinzhou 25-1 light oil & gas field in Bohai sea area and its enlightenmen. China Petroleum Exploration, 2010(1):34-38.
[18] 冯杨伟, 屈红军, 张功成, 等.南海北部琼东南盆地深水区梅山组一段地震相分析.矿物岩石, 2016(3):82-95. FENG Y W, QU H J, ZHANG G C, et al. The seismic facies analyzing of deep water area of Miocene Meishan Formation in Qiong Dong Nan Basin, Novthern South China Sea. Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology, 2016(3):82-95.
[19] 宁松华, 马聪, 曹淼, 等.利用正演模拟优选地震属性预测三道桥地区储层.石油天然气学报, 2014, 36(5):55-58. NING S H, MA C, CAO M, et al. Optimization of seismic attributes and reservoir prediction in Sandaoqiao region based on forward modeling. Joural of Oil and Gas Technology, 2014, 36(5):55-58.
[20] 张京思, 揣媛媛, 边立恩.正演模拟技术在渤海油田X井区砂体连通性研究中的应用.岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(3):127-132. ZHANG J S, CHUAI Y Y, BIAN L E. Application of forward modeling to study of sand body connectivity in X well field of Bohai Oilfield. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(3):127-132.
[21] 王玲, 孙廷彬, 白静波, 等.瞬时频率属性在沉积相研究中的应用——以白音查干凹陷西部腾格尔组为例. 矿物岩石, 2012(6):81-85. WANG L, SUN T B, BAI J B, et al. Application of instantaneous frequency to study of sedimentary facies of Tenggeer Formation in Xilinguolai area, Baiyinchagan Sag. Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology, 2012(6):81-85.
[22] 潘光超, 周家雄, 韩光明, 等.中深层"甜点" 储层地震预测方法探讨——以珠江口盆地西部文昌A凹陷为例. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(2):94-100. PAN G C, ZHOU J X, HAN G M, et al. Seismic prediction method of"sweet"reservoir in middle-deep zone:a case study from Wenchang A sag, western Pearl River Mouth Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(2):94-100.
[23] 徐长贵.渤海古近系坡折带成因类型及其对沉积体系的控制作用.中国海上油气, 2006, 18(6):365-370. XU C G. Genetic types of Paleogene slope-break zones and their controls on depositional system in Bohai off shore. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2006, 18(6):365-370.
[24] 张水山, 刘勇江, 刘贤红.建南地区须六段致密砂岩优质储层预测技术.岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(3):98-102. ZHANG S S, LIU Y J, LIU X H. Prediction technique of highquality reservoir in tight reservoir of the sixth member of Xujiahe Formation in Jiannan area. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2015, 27(3):98-102.
[25] 鲍熙杰.叠前AVA同时反演的道集优化处理及应用效果.断块油气田, 2013, 20(3):282-285. BAO X J. Gather optimal processing and application effect of prestack AVA instantaneous inversion. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2013, 20(3):282-285.
[26] 刘力辉, 杨晓, 丁燕, 等.基于岩性预测的CRP道集优化处理. 石油物探, 2013, 52(5):482-488. LIU L H, YANG X, DING Y, et al. CRP gather optimization processing based on lithological prediction. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2013, 52(5):482-488.
[27] 石战战, 唐湘蓉, 庞溯, 等.一种基于SC-DTW的叠前道集剩余时差校正方法.岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(5):113-119. SHI Z Z, TANG X R, PANG S, et al. Prestack gather residual moveout correction based on shape context and dynamic time warping. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(5):113-119.
[28] JARVIS K,FOLKERS A, MESDAG P. Reservoir characterization of the Flag Sandstone, Barrow sub-basin, using an integrated, multi-parameter seismic AVO inversion technique. The Leading Edge, 2004, 23(8):798-800.
[29] 黄捍东, 汪佳蓓, 郭飞.敏感参数分析在叠前反演流体识别中的应用.物探与化探, 2012,36(6):941-946. HUANG H D, WANG J P, GUO F. The application of sensitive parameters analysis to fluid identification based on pre-stack inversion. Geophysical & Geochemical Exploration, 2012, 36(6):941-946.
[30] 李谋杰, 郭海敏, 蔡炳坤, 等.测井资料一致性处理在井震联合反演中的应用.石油天然气学报, 2014, 36(5):69-72. LI M J, GUO H M, CAI B K, et al. Several key links of well logging data in well-seismic joint inversion. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2014, 36(5):69-72.
[31] 张元中, 周开金, 赵建斌, 等.砂泥岩地层横波测井曲线预测方法研究.石油物探, 2012, 51(5):508-514. ZHANG Y Z, ZHOU K J, ZHAO J B, et al. Shear-wave logging curve prediction method for shaly sand formation. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2012, 51(5):508-514.
[32] LATIMER R B, DAVISON R, RIEL P V. An interpreter' s guide to understanding and working with seismic-derived acoustic impedance data. The Leading Edge, 2000, 19(3):242-256.
[33] 郎晓玲, 彭仕实, 康洪全, 等.叠前同时反演方法在流体识别中的应用.石油物探, 2010, 49(2):164-169. LANG X L, PENG S S, KANG H Q, et al. Application of prestack simultaneous inversion in fluid identification. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2010, 49(2):164-169.
[34] 汪瑞良, 颜承志, 胡琏, 等.叠前反演在南海北部白云凹陷深水区域储层预测中的应用. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 47(4):1305-1311. WANG R L, YAN C Z, HU L, et al. Application of prestack inversion in reservoir prediction in deep water area in baiyun sag of northern South China sea. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2016, 47(4):1305-1311.
[35] 高云, 朱应科, 赵华, 等.叠前同时反演技术在砂砾岩体有效储层预测中的应用.石油物探, 2013, 52(2):223-228. GAO Y, ZHU Y K, ZHAO H, et al. Application of prestack simultaneous inversion technique in effective reservoir prediction of sand-gravel body. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2013, 52(2):223-228.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

锦州25-1油田优质储层地震响应特征与定量预测

Seismic response characteristics and quantitative prediction of high quality reservoirs in Jinzhou 25-1 oilfield

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	张本健, 田云英, 曾琪, 尹宏, 丁熊. 四川盆地西北部三叠系须三段砂砾岩沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 20-28.
[2]	袁纯, 张惠良, 王波. 大型辫状河三角洲砂体构型与储层特征——以库车坳陷北部阿合组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 73-84.
[3]	邓猛, 邵英博, 赵军寿, 廖辉, 邓琪. 渤海A油田明化镇组下段河-坝砂体储层构型及剩余油分布[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 154-163.
[4]	芦凤明, 蔡明俊, 张阳, 倪天禄, 萧希航. 碎屑岩储层构型分级方案与研究方法探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 1-11.
[5]	何康, 张鹏志, 周军良, 甘立琴, 舒晓. 复合曲流带内部构型界面识别新方法及其应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4): 126-135.
[6]	童强, 余建国, 田云吉, 胡克来, 杨红梅, 程旭明, 朱玉双. 演武油田Y116井区延8段构型界面约束下的单河道砂体构型[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3): 144-158.
[7]	龙明, 刘英宪, 陈晓祺, 王美楠, 于登飞. 基于曲流河储层构型的注采结构优化调整[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(6): 145-154.
[8]	涂乙, 王亚会, 闫正和, 高永明, 魏启任. 基于构型单元“势控论”研究与剩余油开发效果分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(4): 133-140.
[9]	印森林, 陈恭洋, 陈玉琨, 吴小军. 砂砾岩储层孔隙结构模态控制下的剩余油分布——以克拉玛依油田七东1区克下组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(5): 91-102.
[10]	常海燕, 严耀祖, 陈更新, 郭宁, 项燚伟, 杨会洁. 近岸水下扇储层构型及剩余油分布模式——以柴达木盆地七个泉油田E₃¹油藏为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(3): 143-152.
[11]	王玥, 郭彦如, 张延玲, 刘俊榜, 田鸣威. 鄂尔多斯盆地东北部山西组层序格架下的砂体成因类型、构型及分布[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(3): 80-91.
[12]	刘超, 李云鹏, 张伟, 冯海潮, 王颍超. 渤海海域A油田夹层控制下的剩余油分布模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(5): 148-154.
[13]	杨特波, 王继平, 王一, 付斌, 薛雯, 郝骞. 基于地质知识库的致密砂岩气藏储层建模——以苏里格气田苏X区块为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(4): 138-145.
[14]	张建兴, 林承焰, 张宪国, 孙志峰, 陈家昀. 基于储层构型与油藏数值模拟的点坝储层剩余油分布研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(4): 146-153.
[15]	张昌民, 胡威, 朱锐, 王绪龙, 侯国伟. 分支河流体系的概念及其对油气勘探开发的意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(3): 1-9.