岩性油气藏 ›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2): 129–138.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20180214

• 油气田开发 • 上一篇    下一篇

砂砾岩储层分布非均质性和质量非均质性研究——以克拉玛依油田五2东区克上组为例

曹茜1,2,3, 王志章4, 王野4, 张栋梁5, 公言杰3, 邹开真6, 樊太亮1,2   

  1. 1. 中国地质大学(北京)能源学院, 北京 100083;
    2. 海相储层演化与油气富集机理教育部重点实验室, 北京 100083;
    3. 中国石油勘探开发研究院, 北京 100083;
    4. 中国石油大学(北京)地球科学学院, 北京 102249;
    5. 中国石油长庆油田分公司 第九采油厂, 银川 750006;
    6. 中国石油青海油田分公司 勘探开发研究院, 甘肃 敦煌 736200
  • 收稿日期:2017-09-06 修回日期:2017-11-09 出版日期:2018-03-21 发布日期:2018-03-21
  • 作者简介:曹茜(1990-),女,中国地质大学(北京)在读博士研究生,研究方向为油气田开发地质。地址:(100083)北京市海淀区学院路29号中国地质大学(北京)。Email:cq_325@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家油气重大专项“前陆冲断带及复杂构造区油气成藏、分布规律与有利区评价”(编号:2016ZX05003-002)和中国石油天然气股份有限公司科学研究与技术开发项目“前陆盆地源储配置与断-盖组合定量评价技术”(编号:2016B-0502)联合资助

Distribution and quality heterogeneity of conglomerate reservoir: a case from upper Karamay Formation in eastern block Wu 2, Karamay Oilfield

CAO Qian1,2,3, WANG Zhizhang4, WANG Ye4, ZHANG Dongliang5, GONG Yanjie3, ZOU Kaizhen6, FAN Tailiang1,2   

  1. 1. School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences(Beijing), Beijing 100083, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Marine Reservoir Evolution and Hydrocarbon Enrichment Mechanism, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100083, China;
    3. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China;
    4. College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China;
    5. No.9 Oil Production Plant, PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Yinchuan 750006, China;
    6. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Qinghai Oilfield Company, Dunhuang 736200, Gansu, China
  • Received:2017-09-06 Revised:2017-11-09 Online:2018-03-21 Published:2018-03-21

摘要: 克拉玛依油田五2东区克上组为扇三角洲砂砾岩储层,砂体叠置关系复杂、储层非均质性严重,部分井组注水效果差。综合该区岩心、测井和实验室分析化验资料,对储层的分布和质量非均质性进行了定性分析和精细定量表征;并在相控约束下,利用熵权法计算综合非均质指数进行评价;最后将分析结果与实际生产数据相结合,总结出储层分布和质量非均质性对实际注采效果的影响。结果表明:各砂层组层间质量非均质性中等;层内渗透率以正韵律、复合正韵律和均质韵律为主,质量非均质性较强;平面上在相控约束下的同一砂体内部,储层质量非均质性表现为中等到强。垂向上S5和S1砂层组内部中厚层砂体组合分层多,其余各砂层组表现为孤立单砂体形式;平面上砂体的分布整体受沉积微相控制。储层分布非均质性是造成注采不见效的原因,储层质量非均质性则导致注采见效难,效果差,该结论对油藏下一步调整注采井网和注采措施具有重要意义。

关键词: 剩余油分布, 数值模拟, 夹层, 储层构型, 渤海海域

Abstract: The upper Karamay Formation in eastern block Wu 2, Karamay Oilfield, is sandy conglomerate reservoir of fan delta, which is characterized by complex sand body distribution, strong heterogeneity and poor effect of water injection and oil production. The data of core, laboratory analysis and well logging were used to study the heterogeneity of reservoir distribution and quality. The data of practical production and the results of qualitative analysis, fine quantitative characterization and synthesis evaluation obtained by entropy method, were adopted to analyze the effects of the distribution and quality heterogeneity on the performance of actual development measure. The result shows that the inter-layer heterogeneity is generally medium. The permeability of layer is dominated by positive rhythm, compound positive rhythm and homogeneous rhythm, and the reservoir quality heterogeneity is strong. In the same sand-body controlled by facies constraints, the reservoir quality heterogeneity is medium to strong. Vertically, the S5 and S1 sand layers are consist of medium-thick sand bodies and can be divided into many layers, with other layers showing isolated single sand body form. The sand body distribution on the plane is controlled by sedimentary microfacies. The heterogeneity of reservoir distribution leads to inefficiency of injection and production. The heterogeneity of reservoir quality leads to poor effect of injection production. This conclusion is of great significance for adjusting the injection production well pattern and measures.

Key words: remaining oil distribution, numerical simulation, interlayer, reservoir architecture, Bohai Sea

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2
[1] 吴胜和, 蔡正旗, 施尚明, 等.油矿地质学.4版.北京:石油工业出版社, 2011:169-185. WU S H, CAI Z Q, SHI S M, et al. Industrial geology of petroleum. 4 th ed. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2011:169-185.
[2] 鲁新川, 史基安, 葛冰, 等.准噶尔盆地西北缘中拐-五八区二叠系上乌尔禾组砂砾岩储层特征. 岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(6):54-59. LU X C, SHI J A, GE B, et al. Characteristics of glutenite reservoir of Permian Upper Wuerhe Formation in Zhongguai-Wuba area in the northwestern margin of Junggar Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2012, 24(6):54-59.
[3] 张冰.利用测井资料研究沉积相与储层非均质性.长春:吉林大学, 2010. ZHANG B. Research on sedimentary facies and reservoir heterogeneity using logging data. Changchun:Jilin University, 2010.
[4] 梁力文, 旷理雄, 敬小军, 等.用非均质性综合指数研究大路沟A区储集层. 新疆石油地质, 2013, 34(2):215-218. LIANG L W, KUANG L X, JING X J, et al. Application of heterogeneity index to study of block-A reservoir in Dalugou area of Jing'an Oilfield,Ordos Basin. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2013, 34(2):215-218.
[5] 刘超, 李云鹏, 张伟, 等.渤海海域A油田夹层控制下的剩余油分布模式.岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(5):148-154. LIU C, LI Y P, ZHANG W, et al. Remaining oil distribution pattern controlled by interlayer in A oilfield in Bohai Sea. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(5):148-154.
[6] 侯雪樱.西峰油田合水区长8油藏储层非均质性研究.西安:西北大学, 2008. HOU X Y. Research on the heterogeneity of Chang 8 reservoir in Heshui area of Xifeng Oilfield. Xi'an:Northwest University, 2008.
[7] 陈建文, 段骁晨, 刘军锋, 等.庄9井区长82油层储层非均质性研究. 长江大学学报(自科版), 2015, 12(32):14-17. CHEN J W, DUAN X C, LIU J F, et al. On heterogeneity of Chang 82 reservoir in well block Zhang 9. Journal of Yangtze University(Natural Science Edition), 2015, 12(32):14-17.
[8] 刘方志, 朱玉双, 李莉, 等.安塞油田塞130井区长6储层非均质性研究.石油地质与工程, 2010, 24(2):1-4. LIU F Z, ZHU Y S, LI L, et al. Research on reservoir heterogeneity of the Chang 6 in Sai 130 well area of Ansai Oilfield. Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 2010, 24(2):1-4.
[9] 李祖兵, 颜其彬, 罗明高.非均质综合指数法在砂砾岩储层非均质性研究中的应用——以双河油田V下油组为例.地质科技情报, 2007, 26(6):83-87. LI Z B, YAN Q B, LUO M G. Reservoir heterogeneity indication applied in researching for heterogeneity of the grail oil:an example of oil group below V in Shuanghe Oilfield. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2007, 26(6):83-87.
[10] 孙乐, 王志章, 于兴河, 等.克拉玛依油田五2东区克上组扇三角洲储层构型分析.油气地质与采收率, 2017, 24(4):8-15. SUN L, WANG Z Z, YU X H, et al. Study on reservoir architecture of fan delta in the Upper Karamay Formation of eastern block Wu 2, Karamay Oilfield. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2017, 24(4):8-15.
[11] 王辉, 解克萍, 胡戈玲, 等.相控储层预测技术在五2东克上组扩边中的应用.新疆石油天然气, 2014, 10(4):1-5. WANG H, XIE K P, HU G L, et al. Application of facies controlled reservoir prediction technique in the Five 2 Dong group in the edge expansion. Xinjiang Oil & Gas, 2014, 10(4):1-5.
[12] 黄澧, 何文祥.综合指数法在神木气田储层非均质性应用.陕西科技大学学报, 2015, 33(1):108-112. HUANG L, HE W X. Application of the composite index method to the heterogeneity of reservoirs in Shenmu gas field. Jounal of Shaanxi University of Science & Technology, 2015, 33(1):108-112.
[13] 刘斌, 何勇明, 段新国.宝浪油田储层夹隔层特征及储层非均质性研究. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 32(6):25-28.LIU B, HE Y M, DUAN X G. Study on the characteristics of interlayers and reservoir heterogeneity of Baolang Oilfield. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2010, 32(6):25-28.
[14] 孙天建, 穆龙新, 赵国良.砂质辫状河储集层隔夹层类型及其表征方法——以苏丹穆格莱特盆地Hegli油田为例.石油勘探与开发, 2014, 41(1):112-120. SUN T J, MU L X, ZHAO G L. Classification and characterization of barrier-intercalation in sandy braided river reservoirs:Taking Hegli Oilfield of Muglad Basin in Sudan as an example. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(1):112-120.
[15] 王延忠.河流相储层夹层精细表征及控油作用研究.石油天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报), 2011, 33(10):43-47. WANG Y Z. Accurate characterization of fluvial facies interbed and its control on remaining oil. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology(Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute), 2011, 33(10):43-47.
[16] 邹妞妞, 张大权, 钱海涛, 等.准噶尔盆地玛北斜坡区扇三角洲砂砾岩储层主控因素.岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(4):24-33. ZOU N N, ZHANG D Q, QIAN H T, et al. Main controlling factors of glutenite reservoir of fan delta in Mabei slope, Junggar Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(4):24-33.
[17] 严科, 杨少春, 任怀强.储层宏观非均质性定量表征研究.石油学报, 2008, 29(6):871. YAN K, YANG S C, REN H Q. Research on quantitative characterization of macroscopic heterogeneity of reservoir. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2008, 29(6):871.
[18] 邵先杰.储层渗透率非均质性表征新参数——渗透率参差系数计算方法及意义.石油实验地质, 2010, 32(4):397-399. SHAO X J. A new characterized parameter for the permeability heterogeneity of the reservoir:Calculation method of permeability diversity coefficient and its significance. Petroleum Geology and Experiment, 2010, 32(4):397-399.
[19] 杨丽.西峰油田白马北区长8油藏开发储层特征评价.西安:西安石油大学, 2012. YANG L. The evaluation on development reservoir character of Chang 8 in Baima north block of Xifeng Oilfield. Xi'an:Xi'an Shiyou University, 2012.
[20] 冯建伟, 戴俊生, 杨少春, 等.综合指数法在河流相储层非均质性研究中的应用——以胜坨油田二区沙二段34储层为例.沉积与特提斯地质, 2011, 31(2):75-81. FENG J W, DAI J S, YANG S C, et al. An application of the composite index method to the heterogeneity of fluvial reservoirs:an example from the 34 reservoirs of the 2nd member of the Shahejie Formation in the 2nd district of the Shengtuo Oil Field. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 2011, 31(2):75-81.
[21] 陈志强, 吴思源, 白蓉, 等.基于流动单元的致密砂岩气储层渗透率测井评价——以川中广安地区须家河组为例. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(6):76-83. CHEN Z Q, WU S Y, BAI R, et al. Logging evaluation for permeability of tight sandstone gas reservoirs based on flow unit classification:a case from Xujiahe Formation in Guang'an area, central Sichuan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(6):76-83.
[22] 刘卫, 林承焰, 杨永智, 等.窄薄砂岩油藏储层非均质性综合评价与剩余油分布——以葡北油田三断块葡Ⅰ油组为例.油气地质与采收率, 2010, 17(1):38. LIU W, LIN C Y, YANG Y Z, et al. Integrated heterogeneity evaluation of thin sandstone reservoirs and remaining oil distribution:a case study of Pu Ⅰ oil formation,No. 3 fault block, Pubei Oilfield. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2010, 17(1):38.
[23] 杨争光, 汤军, 张云鹏, 等.熵权法储层非均质定量评价方法研究——以鄂尔多斯盆地下寺湾长8储层为例.地质学刊, 2012, 36(4):373-378. YANG Z G, TANG J, ZHANG Y P, et al. Study of quantitative evaluation method for heterogeneity by entropy weight method:a case study of Chang 8 reservoir of Xiasiwan in Ordos Basin. Journal of Geology, 2012, 36(4):373-378.
[1] 龙盛芳, 王玉善, 李国良, 段传丽, 邵映明, 何咏梅, 陈凌云, 焦煦. 苏里格气田苏49区块盒8下亚段致密储层非均质性特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 59-69.
[2] 朱苏阳, 李冬梅, 李传亮, 李会会, 刘雄志. 再谈岩石本体变形的孔隙度不变原则[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 180-188.
[3] 邓猛, 邵英博, 赵军寿, 廖辉, 邓琪. 渤海A油田明化镇组下段河-坝砂体储层构型及剩余油分布[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 154-163.
[4] 刘明明, 王全, 马收, 田中政, 丛颜. 基于混合粒子群算法的煤层气井位优化方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 164-171.
[5] 芦凤明, 蔡明俊, 张阳, 倪天禄, 萧希航. 碎屑岩储层构型分级方案与研究方法探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 1-11.
[6] 吕文睿, 张峰, 纪友亮, 周勇, 罗妮娜, 张艺楼, 梁星如, 程煜宗. 饶阳凹陷大王庄地区沙一上亚段河口坝结构对油藏开发的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4): 143-154.
[7] 庞小军, 王清斌, 解婷, 赵梦, 冯冲. 黄河口凹陷北缘古近系物源及其对优质储层的控制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 1-13.
[8] 杜旭林, 戴宗, 辛晶, 李海龙, 曹仁义, 罗东红. 强底水稠油油藏水平井三维水驱物理模拟实验[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 141-148.
[9] 关华, 郭平, 赵春兰, 谭保国, 徐冬梅. 渤海湾盆地永安油田永66区块氮气驱油机理[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 149-160.
[10] 周瑞, 苏玉亮, 马兵, 张琪, 王文东. 随机分形体积压裂水平井CO2吞吐模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(1): 161-168.
[11] 孙哲, 彭靖淞, 江尚昆, 叶涛, 郭颖. 渤海海域庙西中南洼围区烃源岩有机相与测井评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(1): 102-110.
[12] 龙明, 刘英宪, 陈晓祺, 王美楠, 于登飞. 基于曲流河储层构型的注采结构优化调整[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(6): 145-154.
[13] 卞晓冰, 侯磊, 蒋廷学, 高东伟, 张驰. 深层页岩裂缝形态影响因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(6): 161-168.
[14] 李继庆, 刘曰武, 黄灿, 高大鹏. 页岩气水平井试井模型及井间干扰特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(6): 138-144.
[15] 陶帅, 郝永卯, 周杰, 曹小朋, 黎晓舟. 透镜体低渗透岩性油藏合理井网井距研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(5): 116-123.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨秋莲, 李爱琴, 孙燕妮, 崔攀峰. 超低渗储层分类方法探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 51 -56 .
[2] 张杰, 赵玉华. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组地震层序地层研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 71 -74 .
[3] 杨占龙, 张正刚, 陈启林, 郭精义,沙雪梅, 刘文粟. 利用地震信息评价陆相盆地岩性圈闭的关键点分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 57 -63 .
[4] 朱小燕, 李爱琴, 段晓晨, 田随良, 刘美荣. 镇北油田延长组长3 油层组精细地层划分与对比[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 82 -86 .
[5] 方朝合, 王义凤, 郑德温, 葛稚新. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系烃源岩显微组分分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 87 -90 .
[6] 韩春元,赵贤正,金凤鸣,王权,李先平,王素卿. 二连盆地地层岩性油藏“多元控砂—四元成藏—主元富集”与勘探实践(IV)——勘探实践[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 15 -20 .
[7] 戴朝成,郑荣才,文华国,张小兵. 辽东湾盆地旅大地区古近系层序—岩相古地理编图[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 39 -46 .
[8] 尹艳树,张尚峰,尹太举. 钟市油田潜江组含盐层系高分辨率层序地层格架及砂体分布规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 53 -58 .
[9] 石雪峰,杜海峰. 姬塬地区长3—长4+5油层组沉积相研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 59 -63 .
[10] 严世邦,胡望水,李瑞升,关键,李涛,聂晓红. 准噶尔盆地红车断裂带同生逆冲断裂特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 64 -68 .