岩性油气藏 ›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2): 129–138.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20180214

• 油气田开发 • 上一篇    下一篇

砂砾岩储层分布非均质性和质量非均质性研究——以克拉玛依油田五2东区克上组为例

曹茜1,2,3, 王志章4, 王野4, 张栋梁5, 公言杰3, 邹开真6, 樊太亮1,2   

  1. 1. 中国地质大学(北京)能源学院, 北京 100083;
    2. 海相储层演化与油气富集机理教育部重点实验室, 北京 100083;
    3. 中国石油勘探开发研究院, 北京 100083;
    4. 中国石油大学(北京)地球科学学院, 北京 102249;
    5. 中国石油长庆油田分公司 第九采油厂, 银川 750006;
    6. 中国石油青海油田分公司 勘探开发研究院, 甘肃 敦煌 736200
  • 收稿日期:2017-09-06 修回日期:2017-11-09 出版日期:2018-03-21 发布日期:2018-03-21
  • 第一作者:曹茜(1990-),女,中国地质大学(北京)在读博士研究生,研究方向为油气田开发地质。地址:(100083)北京市海淀区学院路29号中国地质大学(北京)。Email:cq_325@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家油气重大专项“前陆冲断带及复杂构造区油气成藏、分布规律与有利区评价”(编号:2016ZX05003-002)和中国石油天然气股份有限公司科学研究与技术开发项目“前陆盆地源储配置与断-盖组合定量评价技术”(编号:2016B-0502)联合资助

Distribution and quality heterogeneity of conglomerate reservoir: a case from upper Karamay Formation in eastern block Wu 2, Karamay Oilfield

CAO Qian1,2,3, WANG Zhizhang4, WANG Ye4, ZHANG Dongliang5, GONG Yanjie3, ZOU Kaizhen6, FAN Tailiang1,2   

  1. 1. School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences(Beijing), Beijing 100083, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Marine Reservoir Evolution and Hydrocarbon Enrichment Mechanism, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100083, China;
    3. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China;
    4. College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China;
    5. No.9 Oil Production Plant, PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Yinchuan 750006, China;
    6. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Qinghai Oilfield Company, Dunhuang 736200, Gansu, China
  • Received:2017-09-06 Revised:2017-11-09 Online:2018-03-21 Published:2018-03-21

摘要: 克拉玛依油田五2东区克上组为扇三角洲砂砾岩储层,砂体叠置关系复杂、储层非均质性严重,部分井组注水效果差。综合该区岩心、测井和实验室分析化验资料,对储层的分布和质量非均质性进行了定性分析和精细定量表征;并在相控约束下,利用熵权法计算综合非均质指数进行评价;最后将分析结果与实际生产数据相结合,总结出储层分布和质量非均质性对实际注采效果的影响。结果表明:各砂层组层间质量非均质性中等;层内渗透率以正韵律、复合正韵律和均质韵律为主,质量非均质性较强;平面上在相控约束下的同一砂体内部,储层质量非均质性表现为中等到强。垂向上S5和S1砂层组内部中厚层砂体组合分层多,其余各砂层组表现为孤立单砂体形式;平面上砂体的分布整体受沉积微相控制。储层分布非均质性是造成注采不见效的原因,储层质量非均质性则导致注采见效难,效果差,该结论对油藏下一步调整注采井网和注采措施具有重要意义。

关键词: 剩余油分布, 数值模拟, 夹层, 储层构型, 渤海海域

Abstract: The upper Karamay Formation in eastern block Wu 2, Karamay Oilfield, is sandy conglomerate reservoir of fan delta, which is characterized by complex sand body distribution, strong heterogeneity and poor effect of water injection and oil production. The data of core, laboratory analysis and well logging were used to study the heterogeneity of reservoir distribution and quality. The data of practical production and the results of qualitative analysis, fine quantitative characterization and synthesis evaluation obtained by entropy method, were adopted to analyze the effects of the distribution and quality heterogeneity on the performance of actual development measure. The result shows that the inter-layer heterogeneity is generally medium. The permeability of layer is dominated by positive rhythm, compound positive rhythm and homogeneous rhythm, and the reservoir quality heterogeneity is strong. In the same sand-body controlled by facies constraints, the reservoir quality heterogeneity is medium to strong. Vertically, the S5 and S1 sand layers are consist of medium-thick sand bodies and can be divided into many layers, with other layers showing isolated single sand body form. The sand body distribution on the plane is controlled by sedimentary microfacies. The heterogeneity of reservoir distribution leads to inefficiency of injection and production. The heterogeneity of reservoir quality leads to poor effect of injection production. This conclusion is of great significance for adjusting the injection production well pattern and measures.

Key words: remaining oil distribution, numerical simulation, interlayer, reservoir architecture, Bohai Sea

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2
[1] 吴胜和, 蔡正旗, 施尚明, 等.油矿地质学.4版.北京:石油工业出版社, 2011:169-185. WU S H, CAI Z Q, SHI S M, et al. Industrial geology of petroleum. 4 th ed. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2011:169-185.
[2] 鲁新川, 史基安, 葛冰, 等.准噶尔盆地西北缘中拐-五八区二叠系上乌尔禾组砂砾岩储层特征. 岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(6):54-59. LU X C, SHI J A, GE B, et al. Characteristics of glutenite reservoir of Permian Upper Wuerhe Formation in Zhongguai-Wuba area in the northwestern margin of Junggar Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2012, 24(6):54-59.
[3] 张冰.利用测井资料研究沉积相与储层非均质性.长春:吉林大学, 2010. ZHANG B. Research on sedimentary facies and reservoir heterogeneity using logging data. Changchun:Jilin University, 2010.
[4] 梁力文, 旷理雄, 敬小军, 等.用非均质性综合指数研究大路沟A区储集层. 新疆石油地质, 2013, 34(2):215-218. LIANG L W, KUANG L X, JING X J, et al. Application of heterogeneity index to study of block-A reservoir in Dalugou area of Jing'an Oilfield,Ordos Basin. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2013, 34(2):215-218.
[5] 刘超, 李云鹏, 张伟, 等.渤海海域A油田夹层控制下的剩余油分布模式.岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(5):148-154. LIU C, LI Y P, ZHANG W, et al. Remaining oil distribution pattern controlled by interlayer in A oilfield in Bohai Sea. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(5):148-154.
[6] 侯雪樱.西峰油田合水区长8油藏储层非均质性研究.西安:西北大学, 2008. HOU X Y. Research on the heterogeneity of Chang 8 reservoir in Heshui area of Xifeng Oilfield. Xi'an:Northwest University, 2008.
[7] 陈建文, 段骁晨, 刘军锋, 等.庄9井区长82油层储层非均质性研究. 长江大学学报(自科版), 2015, 12(32):14-17. CHEN J W, DUAN X C, LIU J F, et al. On heterogeneity of Chang 82 reservoir in well block Zhang 9. Journal of Yangtze University(Natural Science Edition), 2015, 12(32):14-17.
[8] 刘方志, 朱玉双, 李莉, 等.安塞油田塞130井区长6储层非均质性研究.石油地质与工程, 2010, 24(2):1-4. LIU F Z, ZHU Y S, LI L, et al. Research on reservoir heterogeneity of the Chang 6 in Sai 130 well area of Ansai Oilfield. Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 2010, 24(2):1-4.
[9] 李祖兵, 颜其彬, 罗明高.非均质综合指数法在砂砾岩储层非均质性研究中的应用——以双河油田V下油组为例.地质科技情报, 2007, 26(6):83-87. LI Z B, YAN Q B, LUO M G. Reservoir heterogeneity indication applied in researching for heterogeneity of the grail oil:an example of oil group below V in Shuanghe Oilfield. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2007, 26(6):83-87.
[10] 孙乐, 王志章, 于兴河, 等.克拉玛依油田五2东区克上组扇三角洲储层构型分析.油气地质与采收率, 2017, 24(4):8-15. SUN L, WANG Z Z, YU X H, et al. Study on reservoir architecture of fan delta in the Upper Karamay Formation of eastern block Wu 2, Karamay Oilfield. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2017, 24(4):8-15.
[11] 王辉, 解克萍, 胡戈玲, 等.相控储层预测技术在五2东克上组扩边中的应用.新疆石油天然气, 2014, 10(4):1-5. WANG H, XIE K P, HU G L, et al. Application of facies controlled reservoir prediction technique in the Five 2 Dong group in the edge expansion. Xinjiang Oil & Gas, 2014, 10(4):1-5.
[12] 黄澧, 何文祥.综合指数法在神木气田储层非均质性应用.陕西科技大学学报, 2015, 33(1):108-112. HUANG L, HE W X. Application of the composite index method to the heterogeneity of reservoirs in Shenmu gas field. Jounal of Shaanxi University of Science & Technology, 2015, 33(1):108-112.
[13] 刘斌, 何勇明, 段新国.宝浪油田储层夹隔层特征及储层非均质性研究. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 32(6):25-28.LIU B, HE Y M, DUAN X G. Study on the characteristics of interlayers and reservoir heterogeneity of Baolang Oilfield. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2010, 32(6):25-28.
[14] 孙天建, 穆龙新, 赵国良.砂质辫状河储集层隔夹层类型及其表征方法——以苏丹穆格莱特盆地Hegli油田为例.石油勘探与开发, 2014, 41(1):112-120. SUN T J, MU L X, ZHAO G L. Classification and characterization of barrier-intercalation in sandy braided river reservoirs:Taking Hegli Oilfield of Muglad Basin in Sudan as an example. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(1):112-120.
[15] 王延忠.河流相储层夹层精细表征及控油作用研究.石油天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报), 2011, 33(10):43-47. WANG Y Z. Accurate characterization of fluvial facies interbed and its control on remaining oil. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology(Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute), 2011, 33(10):43-47.
[16] 邹妞妞, 张大权, 钱海涛, 等.准噶尔盆地玛北斜坡区扇三角洲砂砾岩储层主控因素.岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(4):24-33. ZOU N N, ZHANG D Q, QIAN H T, et al. Main controlling factors of glutenite reservoir of fan delta in Mabei slope, Junggar Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(4):24-33.
[17] 严科, 杨少春, 任怀强.储层宏观非均质性定量表征研究.石油学报, 2008, 29(6):871. YAN K, YANG S C, REN H Q. Research on quantitative characterization of macroscopic heterogeneity of reservoir. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2008, 29(6):871.
[18] 邵先杰.储层渗透率非均质性表征新参数——渗透率参差系数计算方法及意义.石油实验地质, 2010, 32(4):397-399. SHAO X J. A new characterized parameter for the permeability heterogeneity of the reservoir:Calculation method of permeability diversity coefficient and its significance. Petroleum Geology and Experiment, 2010, 32(4):397-399.
[19] 杨丽.西峰油田白马北区长8油藏开发储层特征评价.西安:西安石油大学, 2012. YANG L. The evaluation on development reservoir character of Chang 8 in Baima north block of Xifeng Oilfield. Xi'an:Xi'an Shiyou University, 2012.
[20] 冯建伟, 戴俊生, 杨少春, 等.综合指数法在河流相储层非均质性研究中的应用——以胜坨油田二区沙二段34储层为例.沉积与特提斯地质, 2011, 31(2):75-81. FENG J W, DAI J S, YANG S C, et al. An application of the composite index method to the heterogeneity of fluvial reservoirs:an example from the 34 reservoirs of the 2nd member of the Shahejie Formation in the 2nd district of the Shengtuo Oil Field. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 2011, 31(2):75-81.
[21] 陈志强, 吴思源, 白蓉, 等.基于流动单元的致密砂岩气储层渗透率测井评价——以川中广安地区须家河组为例. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(6):76-83. CHEN Z Q, WU S Y, BAI R, et al. Logging evaluation for permeability of tight sandstone gas reservoirs based on flow unit classification:a case from Xujiahe Formation in Guang'an area, central Sichuan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(6):76-83.
[22] 刘卫, 林承焰, 杨永智, 等.窄薄砂岩油藏储层非均质性综合评价与剩余油分布——以葡北油田三断块葡Ⅰ油组为例.油气地质与采收率, 2010, 17(1):38. LIU W, LIN C Y, YANG Y Z, et al. Integrated heterogeneity evaluation of thin sandstone reservoirs and remaining oil distribution:a case study of Pu Ⅰ oil formation,No. 3 fault block, Pubei Oilfield. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2010, 17(1):38.
[23] 杨争光, 汤军, 张云鹏, 等.熵权法储层非均质定量评价方法研究——以鄂尔多斯盆地下寺湾长8储层为例.地质学刊, 2012, 36(4):373-378. YANG Z G, TANG J, ZHANG Y P, et al. Study of quantitative evaluation method for heterogeneity by entropy weight method:a case study of Chang 8 reservoir of Xiasiwan in Ordos Basin. Journal of Geology, 2012, 36(4):373-378.
[1] 崔传智, 李静, 吴忠维. 扩散吸附作用下CO2非混相驱微观渗流特征模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 181-188.
[2] 刘仁静, 陆文明. 断块油藏注采耦合提高采收率机理及矿场实践[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 180-188.
[3] 王亚, 刘宗宾, 路研, 王永平, 刘超. 基于SSOM的流动单元划分方法及生产应用——以渤海湾盆地F油田古近系沙三中亚段湖底浊积水道为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 160-169.
[4] 包汉勇, 刘超, 甘玉青, 薛萌, 刘世强, 曾联波, 马诗杰, 罗良. 四川盆地涪陵南地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩古构造应力场及裂缝特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 14-22.
[5] 尹艳树, 丁文刚, 安小平, 徐振华. 鄂尔多斯盆地安塞油田塞160井区三叠系长611储层构型表征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(4): 37-49.
[6] 李丰丰, 倪小威, 徐思慧, 魏新路, 刘迪仁. 斜井各向异性地层随钻侧向测井响应规律及快速校正方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 161-168.
[7] 吕栋梁, 杨健, 林立明, 张恺漓, 陈燕虎. 砂岩储层油水相对渗透率曲线表征模型及其在数值模拟中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(1): 145-159.
[8] 牛成民, 杜晓峰, 王启明, 张参, 丁熠然. 渤海海域新生界大型岩性油气藏形成条件及勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(3): 1-14.
[9] 郑华, 康凯, 刘卫林, 龚敏, 陈善斌. 渤海深层变质岩潜山油藏裂缝主控因素及预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(3): 29-38.
[10] 张威, 李磊, 邱欣卫, 龚广传, 程琳燕, 高毅凡, 杨志鹏, 杨蕾. A/S对断陷湖盆三角洲时空演化的控制及数值模拟——以珠江口盆地陆丰22洼古近系文昌组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(3): 131-141.
[11] 董敏, 郭伟, 张林炎, 吴中海, 马立成, 董会, 冯兴强, 杨跃辉. 川南泸州地区五峰组—龙马溪组古构造应力场及裂缝特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(1): 43-51.
[12] 赵笑笑, 闫建平, 王敏, 何贤, 钟光海, 王军, 耿斌, 胡钦红, 李志鹏. 沾化凹陷沙河街组湖相泥页岩夹层特征及测井识别方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(1): 118-129.
[13] 张皓宇, 李茂, 康永梅, 吴泽民, 王广. 鄂尔多斯盆地镇北油田长3油层组储层构型及剩余油精细表征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(6): 177-188.
[14] 叶涛, 牛成民, 王清斌, 高坤顺, 孙哲, 陈安清. 用“成分-结构”分类法识别古潜山变质岩岩性——以渤海海域太古界为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(6): 156-164.
[15] 龙盛芳, 王玉善, 李国良, 段传丽, 邵映明, 何咏梅, 陈凌云, 焦煦. 苏里格气田苏49区块盒8下亚段致密储层非均质性特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 59-69.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨占龙, 张正刚, 陈启林, 郭精义,沙雪梅, 刘文粟. 利用地震信息评价陆相盆地岩性圈闭的关键点分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 57 -63 .
[2] 方朝合, 王义凤, 郑德温, 葛稚新. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系烃源岩显微组分分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 87 -90 .
[3] 林承焰, 谭丽娟, 于翠玲. 论油气分布的不均一性(Ⅰ)———非均质控油理论的由来[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 16 -21 .
[4] 王天琦, 王建功, 梁苏娟, 沙雪梅. 松辽盆地徐家围子地区葡萄花油层精细勘探[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 22 -27 .
[5] 王西文,石兰亭,雍学善,杨午阳. 地震波阻抗反演方法研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 80 -88 .
[6] 何宗斌,倪 静,伍 东,李 勇,刘丽琼,台怀忠. 根据双TE 测井确定含烃饱和度[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 89 -92 .
[7] 袁胜学,王 江. 吐哈盆地鄯勒地区浅层气层识别方法研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 111 -113 .
[8] 陈斐,魏登峰,余小雷,吴少波. 鄂尔多斯盆地盐定地区三叠系延长组长2 油层组沉积相研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 43 -47 .
[9] 徐云霞,王山山,杨帅. 利用沃尔什变换提高地震资料信噪比[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(3): 98 -100 .
[10] 李建明,史玲玲,汪立群,吴光大. 柴西南地区昆北断阶带基岩油藏储层特征分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(2): 20 -23 .