鄂尔多斯盆地东缘康宁地区二叠系致密储层成岩作用与孔隙度演化

doi:10.12108/yxyqc.20190207

岩性油气藏 ›› 2019, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2): 56–65.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20190207

鄂尔多斯盆地东缘康宁地区二叠系致密储层成岩作用与孔隙度演化

呼延钰莹^1,2, 姜福杰², 庞雄奇², 刘铁树³, 陈晓智³, 李龙龙^2,4, 邵新荷², 郑定业²

1. 中国地质科学院地球物理地球化学勘查研究所, 河北廊坊 065000;
2. 中国石油大学(北京)地球科学学院, 北京 102249;
3. 中海油研究总院有限责任公司, 北京 100028;
4. 中国石化石油勘探开发研究院无锡石油地质研究所, 江苏无锡 214126

收稿日期:2018-10-09 修回日期:2018-12-04 出版日期:2019-03-21 发布日期:2019-03-21
通讯作者: 姜福杰(1979-),男,博士,副教授,主要从事油气成藏机理与资源评价方面的教学和科研工作。Email:jiangfijwl@163.com。 E-mail:jiangfijwl@163.com
作者简介:呼延钰莹(1993-),女,硕士,主要从事储层沉积学与油气成藏方面的研究工作。地址:(065000)河北省廊坊市金光道84号物化探所。Email:huyanyuying@igge.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重点基金“广泛连续型致密砂岩气藏成因机制与预测方法”（编号：U1262205）和中海石油（中国）有限公司综合科研项目“康宁—神府区块致密砂岩气成藏机理研究”（编号：YXKY-2016-ZY-04）联合资助

Diagenesis and porosity evolution of Permian tight reservoirs in Kangning area,eastern margin of Ordos Basin

HUYAN Yuying^1,2, JIANG Fujie², PANG Xiongqi², LIU Tieshu³, CHEN Xiaozhi³, LI Longlong^2,4, SHAO Xinhe², ZHENG Dingye²

1. Institute of Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Langfang 065000, Hebei, China;
2. College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, China;
3. CNOOC Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 100028, China;
4. Wuxi Research Institute of Petroleum Geology, SINOPEC, Wuxi 214126, Jiangsu, China

Received:2018-10-09 Revised:2018-12-04 Online:2019-03-21 Published:2019-03-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘康宁地区具有广阔的天然气勘探前景，是我国致密气勘探开发的重点区域之一。为研究其储层成岩作用及致密化机理，开展了铸体薄片鉴定、扫描电镜分析、X射线衍射测试、粒度分析等研究，对二叠系致密储层的岩石成分、孔隙类型和成岩演化等进行了深入探讨。结果表明：①岩石类型以细-中粒长石岩屑砂岩和岩屑砂岩为主，石英体积分数平均49%，岩屑体积分数平均36%，长石体积分数平均15%；②储层物性以低孔-特低渗型为主，平均孔隙度为7%，平均渗透率为0.46 mD，为典型致密储层；孔径小，喉道细，分选差，以次生溶蚀孔隙为主；③二叠系砂岩经历了压实作用、胶结作用、溶蚀-交代作用，成岩阶段为中成岩A-B期。④压实作用是导致储层致密的主要因素，使得初始孔隙度减少了16.39%，碳酸盐胶结作用和黏土矿物的充填作用次之，使孔隙度减少了约12.30%，后期溶蚀作用使孔隙度增加了6.01%，这一结论与现今实测平均孔隙度平均值7.46%较为吻合。上述研究成果对研究区致密气藏勘探中寻找次生溶蚀"甜点"具有一定的参考价值。

关键词: 成岩作用, 孔隙度演化, 致密砂岩, 二叠系, 康宁地区, 鄂尔多斯盆地

Abstract: Giant natural gas potential exists in Kangning area in the eastern margin of Ordos Basin which is one of the tight sands gas targets in China. To investigate the diagenesis characteristics and genesis of densification, based on the data of thin sections,scanning electron microscope (SEM),X-ray diffraction,particle size analysis, the rock composition,pore type and diagenesis-porosity evolution process of Permian reservoirs were analyzed. The results show that reservoirs are dominated by fine-medium feldspathic lithic sandstone and lithic sandstone. The average content of quartz is 49%. Rock fragment and feldspar content is in average values of 36% and 15% respectively. The reservoirs are typical low porosity and extra-low permeability tight sandstone,with an average porosity of 7% and an average permeability of 0.46 mD. The pore diameter is small with fine throat and poor sorting. Additionally,secondary dissolved pore dominates the main pore system. The Permian sandstone reservoirs have experienced compaction,cementation and dissolution-replacement,which are divided into middle A-B diagenetic stage. Compaction is the key to cause the formation of tight reservoirs,resulting in a porosity loss of 16.39%. Second leading factor is carbonate cementation and clay mineral filling,which reduces porosity by 12.30%,whereas later dissolution increases porosity by 6.01%. The calculated porosity is almost equivalent to the measured average porosity of 7.46%. The above research results have a certain reference value for searching for secondary dissolution sweet spot in exploration of tight gas reservoirs in the study area.

Key words: diagenesis, porosity evolution, tight sandstone, Permian, Kangning area, Ordos Basin

中图分类号:

TE122.2

呼延钰莹, 姜福杰, 庞雄奇, 刘铁树, 陈晓智, 李龙龙, 邵新荷, 郑定业. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘康宁地区二叠系致密储层成岩作用与孔隙度演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(2): 56–65.

HUYAN Yuying, JIANG Fujie, PANG Xiongqi, LIU Tieshu, CHEN Xiaozhi, LI Longlong, SHAO Xinhe, ZHENG Dingye. Diagenesis and porosity evolution of Permian tight reservoirs in Kangning area,eastern margin of Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(2): 56–65.

参考文献

[1] HOLDITCH S A. Tight gas sands. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 2006, 58(6):86.
[2] 魏新善, 胡爱平, 赵会涛, 等.致密砂岩气地质认识新进展. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(1):12. WEI X S, HU A P, ZHAO H T, et al. New geological understanding of tight sandstone gas. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(1):12.
[3] 傅宁, 杨树春, 贺清, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地东缘临兴-神府区块致密砂岩气高效成藏条件.石油学报, 2016, 37(增刊1):111. FU N, YANG S C, HE Q, et al. High-efficiency reservoir for-mation conditions of tight sandstone gas in Linxing-Shenfu blocks on the east margin of Ordos Basin. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(Suppl 1):111.
[4] 赵达, 许浩, 汤达祯, 等. 临兴地区下石盒子组致密砂岩储层成岩作用及有利成岩相研究.科技通报, 2016, 32(7):31. ZHAO D, XU H, TANG D Z, et al. Diagenesis and favorable diageneticfacies analysis on the tight sand stone reservoirs of the Lower Shihezi Formation in Linxing area. Bulletin of Science and Technology, 2016, 32(7):31.
[5] ATHY L F. Density, porosity and compaction of sedimentary rocks. AAPG Bulletin, 1930, 14(1):13.
[6] MAXWELL J C. Influence of depth,temperature and geologic age on porosity of quartz sandstone. AAPG Bulletin, 1964, 48(5):707.
[7] SCHERER M. Parameters influencing porosity in sandstones:a model for sandstone porosity prediction. AAPG Bulletin, 1987, 71(5):486.
[8] 王瑞飞, 陈明强. 储层沉积-成岩过程中孔隙度参数演化的定量分析:以鄂尔多斯盆地沿25区块、庄40区块为例. 地质学报, 2007, 81(10):1435. WANG R F, CHEN M Q. Quantitative analysis of porosity evolution during the reservoir sedimentation-diagenesis:Taking the Yan 25 and Zhuang 40 areas in the Ordos Basin as examples. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2007, 81(10):1435.
[9] 郝杰, 周立发, 袁义东, 等. 断陷湖盆致密砂砾岩储层成岩作用及其对孔隙演化的影响. 石油实验地质, 2018, 40(5):635. HAO J, ZHOU L F, YUAN Y D, et al. Diagenetic characteristics and their control on porosity of sandy conglomerate reservoirs in faulted basins. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2018, 40(5):635.
[10] 汪洋, 李树同, 牟炜卫, 等. 姬塬西部地区长81致密储层特征及孔隙度演化分析. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(4):62-63. WANG Y, LI S T, MOU W W, et al. Tight reservoir characteristics and porosity evolution of Chang 81 in western Jiyuan area. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(4):62-63.
[11] ZOU C N, ZHU R K, LIU K Y, et al. Tight gas sandstone reservoirs in China:Characteristics and recognition criteria. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2012, 83:82-89.
[12] 冯旭, 刘洛夫, 李朝玮, 等. 碎屑岩孔隙演化定量计算方法的改进和应用. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(6):1199. FENG X, LIU L F, LI C W, et al. Improvement and application of quantitative calculation of porosity evolution of clastic rock. Oil & Gas Geology, 2017, 38(6):1199.
[13] 武文慧. 鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界储层砂岩特征及成岩作用研究. 成都:成都理工大学, 2011. WU W H. Research on the characteristics and diagenesis of sandstone in the Upper Paleozoic reservoir in Ordos Basin. Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology, 2011.
[14] DOWEY P J, HODGSON D M, WORDEN R H. Pre-requisites, processes, and prediction of chlorite grain coatings in petroleum reservoirs:a review of subsurface example. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2012, 32(1):73.
[15] 吴陈冰洁, 朱筱敏, 魏巍, 等.查干凹陷下白垩统巴二段储层特征及孔隙演化. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(1):75. WU-CHEN B J, ZHU X M, WEI W, et al. Reservoir characteristics and pore evolution of the second member of the Lower Cretaceous Bayingebi Formation in Chagan Depression. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(1):75.
[16] 范萌萌, 李文厚, 袁珍. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南部长6成岩作用及其对孔隙的影响. 地质通报, 2016, 35(2/3):449. FAN M M, LI W H, YUAN Z. Diagenesis and its influence on porosity of Chang 6 reservoir in southeast Ordos Basin. Geological Bulletin of China, 2016, 35(2/3):449.
[17] 刘再振, 刘玉明, 李洋冰, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地神府地区太原组致密砂岩储层特征及成岩演化.岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(6):55. LIU Z Z, LIU Y M, LI Y B, et al. Tight sandstone reservoir characteristics and diagenesis evolution of Taiyuan Formation in Shenmu-Fugu area, Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(6):55.
[18] 任战利, 于强, 崔军平, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地热演化史及其对油气的控制作用.地学前缘, 2017, 24(3):138-139. REN Z L, YU Q, CUI J P, et al. Thermal history and its controls on oil and gas of the Orods Basin. Earth Science Frontiers, 2017, 24(3):138-139.
[19] 赵孟为. 磷灰石裂变径迹分析在恢复盆地沉降抬升史中的应用:以鄂尔多斯盆地为例. 地球物理学报, 1996, 39(增刊1):241-242. ZHAO M W. The application of apatite fission track analysis to the reconstruction of the subsidence and uplift history of sedimentary basins:a case study from the Ordos Basin. Acta Geophysica Sinica, 1996, 39(Suppl 1):241-242.
[20] 于强. 鄂尔多斯盆地中东部地区古生界热演化史与天然气成藏. 西安:西北大学, 2012. YU Q. The Paleozoic thermal evolution history and natural gas accumulation of the central and eastern parts of Ordos Basin. Xi'an:Northwestern University, 2012.
[21] BEARD D C,WEYL P K. Influence of texture on porosity and permeability of unconsolidated sand. AAPG Bulletin, 1973, 57(2):352.
[22] SCLATER J G, CHRISTIE P A F. Continental stretching:an exploration of the post-mid-Cretaceous subsidence of the central North Sea Basin. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1980, 85(B7):3732.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

鄂尔多斯盆地东缘康宁地区二叠系致密储层成岩作用与孔隙度演化

Diagenesis and porosity evolution of Permian tight reservoirs in Kangning area,eastern margin of Ordos Basin

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	柴毓, 王贵文, 柴新. 四川盆地金秋区块三叠系须二段储层非均质性及成因[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 29-40.
[2]	徐宁宁, 王永诗, 张守鹏, 邱隆伟, 张向津, 林茹. 鄂尔多斯盆地大牛地气田二叠系盒1段储层特征及成岩圈闭[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 52-62.
[3]	李志远, 杨仁超, 张吉, 王一, 杨特波, 董亮. 天然气扩散散失率定量评价——以苏里格气田苏X区块为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 76-84.
[4]	张文凯, 施泽进, 田亚铭, 王勇, 胡修权, 李文杰. 川东南志留系小河坝组致密砂岩孔隙类型及成因[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 10-19.
[5]	郑荣臣, 李宏涛, 史云清, 肖开华. 川东北元坝地区三叠系须三段沉积特征及成岩作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 13-26.
[6]	刘桓, 苏勤, 曾华会, 孟会杰, 张小美, 雍运动. 近地表Q补偿技术在川中地区致密气勘探中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 104-112.
[7]	许飞. 考虑化学渗透压作用下页岩气储层压裂液的自发渗吸特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 145-152.
[8]	郭永伟, 闫方平, 王晶, 褚会丽, 杨建雷, 陈颖超, 张笑洋. 致密砂岩油藏CO₂驱固相沉积规律及其储层伤害特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 153-161.
[9]	姚海鹏, 于东方, 李玲, 林海涛. 内蒙古地区典型煤储层吸附特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 1-8.
[10]	魏钦廉, 崔改霞, 刘美荣, 吕玉娟, 郭文杰. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部二叠系盒8下段储层特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 17-25.
[11]	张晓辉, 张娟, 袁京素, 崔小丽, 毛振华. 鄂尔多斯盆地南梁-华池地区长8₁致密储层微观孔喉结构及其对渗流的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 36-48.
[12]	严敏, 赵靖舟, 曹青, 吴和源, 黄延昭. 鄂尔多斯盆地临兴地区二叠系石盒子组储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 49-58.
[13]	龙盛芳, 王玉善, 李国良, 段传丽, 邵映明, 何咏梅, 陈凌云, 焦煦. 苏里格气田苏49区块盒8下亚段致密储层非均质性特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 59-69.
[14]	马永平, 张献文, 朱卡, 王国栋, 潘树新, 黄林军, 张寒, 关新. 玛湖凹陷二叠系上乌尔禾组扇三角洲沉积特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 57-70.
[15]	周新平, 邓秀芹, 李士祥, 左静, 张文选, 李涛涛, 廖永乐. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组下组合地层水特征及其油气地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 109-120.