岩性油气藏 ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5): 131–138.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20230513

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

塔里木盆地顺北1号断裂带走滑分段特征与控储控藏作用

朱秀香1, 赵锐1,2, 赵腾2,3   

  1. 1. 中国石化西北油田分公司 勘探开发研究院, 乌鲁木齐 830011;
    2. 中国石化石油勘探开发研究院, 北京 100083;
    3. 中国地质大学 (北京)能源学院, 北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-07 修回日期:2022-06-13 出版日期:2023-09-01 发布日期:2023-09-28
  • 第一作者:朱秀香(1983—),女,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事塔里木盆地碳酸盐岩储层与油气成藏研究工作。地址:(830011)新疆维吾尔自治区乌鲁木齐市新市区长春南路466号。Email:179520361@qq.com。
  • 通信作者: 赵锐(1988—),男,博士,高级工程师,主要从事碳酸盐岩油气田勘探开发及建模数模研究工作。Email:zhaorui2018@sinopec.com。
  • 基金资助:
    中国石油化工股份有限公司科技部项目 “顺北超深碳酸盐岩高产富集规律与目标评价”(编号: P21033-3) 和国家自然科学基金项目 “海相深层碳酸盐岩层系油气成藏机理与开发方法”(编号: U19B6003-02) 联合资助。

Characteristics and control effect on reservoir and accumulation of strike-slip segments in Shunbei No. 1 fault zone,Tarim Basin

ZHU Xiuxiang1, ZHAO Rui1,2, ZHAO Teng2,3   

  1. 1. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, Northwest Oilfield Company, Sinopec, Urumqi 830011, China;
    2. Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Production, Sinopec, Beijing 100083, China;
    3. School of Energy, China University of Geosciences(Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
  • Received:2022-03-07 Revised:2022-06-13 Online:2023-09-01 Published:2023-09-28

摘要: 塔里木盆地顺北地区沿走滑断裂带展布的特深层断控缝洞型油气藏具有明显的分段性。通过三维地震断裂精细解释,综合钻井、测井、试采等资料对顺北1号断裂带走滑分段特征及分段内部储集体结构差异性及成因进行了研究,优选出有利的储集体类型。研究结果表明: ①顺北1号断裂带由8个几何分段斜列叠置而成,每个几何分段形成一套独立的储集单元,单个储集单元的内部缝洞结构基本一致,但相邻储集单元的内部缝洞结构差异明显,且彼此间油气藏不连通。②几何分段的内部缝洞结构由走滑构造的活动强度控制,据此可以划分出内洞外缝结构、双重洞-缝结构与大型“均质”储集体等内部储集体结构类型,其中大型“均质”储集体发育多套缝洞体,缝洞尺寸大、数量多、内部连通性强,有利于油气富集。

关键词: 特深层, 走滑断层分段, 储集体, 油藏连通性, 顺北1号带, 塔里木盆地

Abstract: The extra-deep fault-controlled fractured-vuggy reservoirs distributed along strike-slip fault zones in Shunbei area of Tarim Basin have obvious subsection differences. Through interpretation of 3D seismic data, combined with data of drilling,logging and production test,the characteristics of the strike-slip segments of Shunbei No. 1 fault zone and the differences and causes of internal reservoir structure in different geometric segments were studied,and favorable reservoirs were selected. The results show that: (1)Shunbei No. 1 fault zone is formed by the oblique superposition of eight geometric segments,each of which forms a set of independent reservoir units. The internal fracture cave structure of a single reservoir unit is basically the same,but the internal fracture cave structure of adjacent reservoir units is obviously different,and the oil and gas reservoirs are not connected with each other.(2)The internal fracture cavity structure of the geometric segments is controlled by the activity intensity of strike-slip structure,according to which,internal and external fracture structures,double hole fracture structures,large-scale homogeneous reservoirs and other internal reservoir structure can be divided. Among them,large-scale homogeneous reservoirs develop multiple sets of fracture cavity bodies,with large size, large number and strong internal connectivity, which is conducive to oil and gas enrichment.

Key words: extra-deep layer, strike-slip fault segment, reservoir, reservoir connectivity, Shunbei No. 1 fault zone, Tarim Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122
[1] 赵锐,赵腾,李慧莉,等.塔里木盆地顺北油气田断控缝洞型储层特征与主控因素[J].特种油气藏, 2019, 26(5):8-13. ZHAO Rui, ZHAO Teng, LI Huili, et al. Fault-controlled fracturecavity reservoir characterization and main-controlling factors in the Shunbei hydrocarbon field of Tarim Basin[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2019, 26(5):8-13.
[2] 胡文革.塔河碳酸盐岩缝洞型油藏开发技术及攻关方向[J].油气藏评价与开发, 2020, 10(2):1-10. HU Wenge. Development technology and research direction of fractured-vuggy carbonate reservoirs in Tahe Oilfield[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(2):1-10.
[3] 邓尚,李慧莉,张仲培,等.塔里木盆地顺北及邻区主干走滑断裂带差异活动特征及其与油气富集的关系[J].石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(5):38-48. DENG Shang, LI Huili, ZHANG Zhongpei, et al. Characteristics of differential activities in major strike-slip fault zones and their control on hydrocarbon enrichment in Shunbei area and its surroundings, Tarim Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2018, 39(5):38-48.
[4] 王素英,张翔,田景春,等.塔里木盆地顺北地区柯坪塔格组沉积演化及沉积分异模式[J].岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(5):81-94. WANG Suying, ZHANG Xiang, TIAN Jingchun, et al. Sedimentary evolution and sedimentary differentiation model of Kepingtage Formation in Shunbei area, Tarim Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(5):81-94.
[5] 漆立新.塔里木盆地顺北超深断溶体油藏特征与启示[J].中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(1):102-111. QI Lixin. Characteristics and inspiration of ultra-deep fault-karst reservoir in the Shunbei area of the Tarim Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2020, 25(1):102-111.
[6] 陈袁,廖发明,吕波,等.塔里木盆地迪那2气田古近系离散裂缝表征与建模[J].岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(3):104-116. CHEN Yuan, LIAO Faming, LYU Bo, et al. Discrete fracture characterization and modeling of Paleogene in Dina-2 gas field, Tarim Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(3):104-116.
[7] 李映涛,漆立新,张哨楠,等.塔里木盆地顺北地区中-下奥陶统断溶体储层特征及发育模式[J].石油学报, 2019, 40(12):1470-1484. LI Yingtao, QI Lixin, ZHANG Shaonan, et al. Characteristics and development mode of the Middle and Lower Ordovician fault-karst reservoir in Shunbei area, Tarim Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2019, 40(12):1470-1484.
[8] 刘冬冬,杨东旭,张子亚,等.基于常规测井和成像测井的致密储层裂缝识别方法:以准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组为例[J].岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(3):76-85. LIU Dongdong, YANG Dongxu, ZHANG Ziya, et al. Fracture identification for tight reservoirs by conventional and imaging logging:A case study of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(3):76-85.
[9] 邓尚,李慧莉,韩俊,等.塔里木盆地顺北5号走滑断裂中段活动特征及其地质意义[J].石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(5):990-998. DENG Shang, LI Huili, HAN Jun, et al. Characteristics of the central segment of Shunbei 5 strike-slip fault zone in Tarim Basin and its geological significance[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(5):990-998.
[10] 彭军,夏梦,曹飞,等.塔里木盆地顺北一区奥陶系鹰山组与一间房组沉积特征[J].岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(2):17-30. PENG Jun, XIA Meng, CAO Fei, et al. Sedimentary characteristics of Ordovician Yingshan Formation and Yijianfang Formation in Shunbei-1 area, Tarim Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(2):17-30.
[11] 谷茸,云露,朱秀香,等.塔里木盆地顺北油田油气来源研究[J].石油实验地质, 2020, 42(2):248-254. GU Rong, YUN Lu, ZHU Xiuxiang, et al. Oil and gas sources in Shunbei Oilfield, Tarim Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(2):248-254.
[12] 隋欢,张哨楠.塔里木盆地顺北一号断裂带奥陶系一间房组碳酸盐岩储层主控因素研究[C]//第十五届全国古地理学及沉积学学术会议摘要集.成都:中国矿物岩石地球化学学会岩相古地理专业委员会, 2018:246-247. SUI Huan, ZHANG Shaonan. Research on main control factors of carbonate reservoir of Ordovician Yijianfang Formation in Shunbei 1 fault zone, Tarim Basin[C]//Summary of the 15th National Conference on Paleogeography and Sedimentology. Chengdu:Professional Committee of Lithofacies and Palaeogeography, Chinese Society for Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 2018:246-247.
[13] 苑雅轩,樊太亮,苑学军,等.塔河油田蓬莱坝组异常地震特征及地质成因分析[J].岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(6):98-108. YUAN Yaxuan, FAN Tailiang, YUAN Xuejun, et al. Characteristics and geological genesis of anomalous seismic facies of Penglaiba Formation in Tahe Oilfield[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(6):98-108.
[14] 韩杰,江杰,张敏,等.断裂及其裂缝发育带在塔中油气勘探中的意义[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 37(2):11-20. HAN Jie, JIANG Jie, ZHANG Min, et al. Significance of fault and fracture developing area in oil and gas exploration in Tazhong[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2015, 37(2):11-20.
[15] 刘宝增.塔里木盆地顺北地区油气差异聚集主控因素分析:以顺北1号、顺北5号走滑断裂带为例[J].中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(3):83-95. LIU Baozeng. Analysis of main controlling factors of oil and gas differential accumulation in Shunbei area,Tarim Basin:Taking Shunbei No.1 and No.5 strike slip fault zones as examples[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2020, 25(3):83-95.
[16] 赵锐,赵腾,李慧莉,等.塔里木盆地顺托果勒地区中下奥陶统鹰山组与一间房组沉积相与旋回地层[J].东北石油大学学报, 2019, 43(4):1-16. ZHAO Rui, ZHAO Teng, LI Huili, et al. Sedimentary facies and cyclic stratigraphy of Yingshan and Yijianfang Formations of Lower-Middle Ordovician in Shuntuoguole area, Tarim Basin[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2019, 43(4):1-16.
[17] DENG Shang, LI Huili, ZHANG Zhongpei, et al. Structural characterization of intracratonic strike-slip faults in the central Tarim Basin[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2019, 103(1):109-137.
[18] MITCHELL T M, FAULKNER D R. The nature and origin of off-fault damage surrounding strike-slip fault zones with a wide range of displacements:A field study from the Atacama fault system, northern Chile[J]. Journal of Structural Geology, 2009, 31:802-816.
[19] JEANNE P, GUGLIELMI Y, LAMARCHE J, et al. Architectural characteristics and petrophysical properties evolution of a strike-slip fault zone in a fractured porous carbonate reservoir[J]. Jour-nal of Structural Geology, 2012, 34:93-109.
[20] 焦方正.塔里木盆地顺托果勒地区北东向走滑断裂带的油气勘探意义[J].石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(5):831-839. JIAO Fangzheng. Significance of oil and gas exploration in NE strike-slip fault belts in Shuntuoguole area of Tarim Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2017, 38(5):831-839.
[21] GALE J, GOMEZ L. Late opening-mode fractures in karst-brecciated dolostones of the Lower Ordovician Ellenburger Group, west Texas:Recognition, characterization, and implications for fluid flow[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2007, 91(7):1005-1023.
[22] KIM Y S, SANDERSON D J. Inferred fluid flow through fault damage zones based on the observation of stalactites in carbonate caves[J]. Journal of Structural Geology, 2010, 32:1305-1316.
[23] 黄诚.叠合盆地内部小尺度走滑断裂幕式活动特征及期次判别:以塔里木盆地顺北地区为例[J].石油实验地质, 2019, 41(3):379-389. HUANG Cheng. Multi-stage activity characteristics of smallscale strike-slip faults in superimposed basin and its identification method:A case study of Shunbei area, Tarim Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2019, 41(3):379-389.
[24] BECK C, KHADEEVA A, SARMAH B, et al. Use of seismic attributes and open-hole log data to characterize production variability in a fractured carbonate play:A case study from Madison County, Texas[J]. Interpretation, 2019, 7(1):167-178.
[25] LI Jianwei, ZHOU Meifu, LI Xianfu, et al. Structural control on uranium mineralization in South China:Implications for fluid flow in continental strike-slip faults[J]. Science in China Series D:Earth Sciences, 2002, 45(9):851-864.
[1] 易珍丽, 石放, 尹太举, 李斌, 李猛, 刘柳, 王铸坤, 余烨. 塔里木盆地哈拉哈塘—哈得地区中生界物源转换及沉积充填响应[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 56-66.
[2] 孟庆昊, 张昌民, 张祥辉, 朱锐, 向建波. 塔里木盆地现代分支河流体系形态、分布及其主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 44-56.
[3] 陈叔阳, 何云峰, 王立鑫, 尚浩杰, 杨昕睿, 尹艳树. 塔里木盆地顺北1号断裂带奥陶系碳酸盐岩储层结构表征及三维地质建模[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 124-135.
[4] 张坦, 贾梦瑶, 孙雅雄, 丁文龙, 石司宇, 范昕禹, 姚威. 四川盆地南部中二叠统茅口组岩溶古地貌恢复及特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 111-120.
[5] 宋兴国, 陈石, 杨明慧, 谢舟, 康鹏飞, 李婷, 陈九洲, 彭梓俊. 塔里木盆地富满油田F16断裂发育特征及其对油气分布的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 99-109.
[6] 卜旭强, 王来源, 朱莲花, 黄诚, 朱秀香. 塔里木盆地顺北油气田奥陶系断控缝洞型储层特征及成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 152-160.
[7] 倪新锋, 沈安江, 乔占峰, 郑剑锋, 郑兴平, 杨钊. 塔里木盆地奥陶系缝洞型碳酸盐岩岩溶储层成因及勘探启示[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 144-158.
[8] 陈袁, 廖发明, 吕波, 贾伟, 宋秋强, 吴燕, 亢鞠, 鲜让之. 塔里木盆地迪那2气田古近系离散裂缝表征与建模[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(3): 104-116.
[9] 彭军, 夏梦, 曹飞, 夏金刚, 李峰. 塔里木盆地顺北一区奥陶系鹰山组与一间房组沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(2): 17-30.
[10] 任婕, 胡忠贵, 胡明毅, 李雄, 庞艳荣, 左洺滔, 黄宇飞. 涪陵地区下三叠统飞仙关组沉积相特征及有利储集体分布[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(6): 70-80.
[11] 王素英, 张翔, 田景春, 彭明鸿, 郑潇宇, 夏永涛. 塔里木盆地顺北地区柯坪塔格组沉积演化及沉积分异模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(5): 81-94.
[12] 李慧莉, 尤东华, 李建交, 谭广辉, 刘士林. 麦盖提斜坡北新1井吐依洛克组角砾岩储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 26-35.
[13] 任大忠, 张晖, 周然, 王茜, 黄海, 唐胜蓝, 金娜. 塔里木盆地克深地区巴什基奇克组致密砂岩储层敏感性研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(6): 27-36.
[14] 仲米虹, 唐武. 前陆盆地隆后坳陷区湖底扇沉积特征及主控因素——以塔北轮南地区三叠系为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(5): 18-28.
[15] 田亮, 李佳玲, 焦保雷. 塔河油田12区奥陶系油藏溶洞充填机理及挖潜方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(3): 52-60.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨秋莲, 李爱琴, 孙燕妮, 崔攀峰. 超低渗储层分类方法探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 51 -56 .
[2] 张杰, 赵玉华. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组地震层序地层研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 71 -74 .
[3] 杨占龙, 张正刚, 陈启林, 郭精义,沙雪梅, 刘文粟. 利用地震信息评价陆相盆地岩性圈闭的关键点分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 57 -63 .
[4] 朱小燕, 李爱琴, 段晓晨, 田随良, 刘美荣. 镇北油田延长组长3 油层组精细地层划分与对比[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 82 -86 .
[5] 方朝合, 王义凤, 郑德温, 葛稚新. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系烃源岩显微组分分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 87 -90 .
[6] 韩春元,赵贤正,金凤鸣,王权,李先平,王素卿. 二连盆地地层岩性油藏“多元控砂—四元成藏—主元富集”与勘探实践(IV)——勘探实践[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 15 -20 .
[7] 戴朝成,郑荣才,文华国,张小兵. 辽东湾盆地旅大地区古近系层序—岩相古地理编图[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 39 -46 .
[8] 尹艳树,张尚峰,尹太举. 钟市油田潜江组含盐层系高分辨率层序地层格架及砂体分布规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 53 -58 .
[9] 石雪峰,杜海峰. 姬塬地区长3—长4+5油层组沉积相研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 59 -63 .
[10] 严世邦,胡望水,李瑞升,关键,李涛,聂晓红. 准噶尔盆地红车断裂带同生逆冲断裂特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 64 -68 .