麦盖提斜坡北新1井吐依洛克组角砾岩储层特征

doi:10.12108/yxyqc.20210204

岩性油气藏 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 26–35.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20210204

麦盖提斜坡北新1井吐依洛克组角砾岩储层特征

李慧莉¹, 尤东华², 李建交¹, 谭广辉³, 刘士林⁴

1. 中国石化石油勘探开发研究院, 北京 100083;
2. 中国石化石油勘探开发研究院无锡石油地质研究所, 江苏无锡 214126;
3. 中国石化西北油田分公司勘探开发研究院, 乌鲁木齐 830011;
4. 中国石化油田勘探开发事业部, 北京 100728

收稿日期:2020-09-06 修回日期:2020-10-13 出版日期:2021-04-01 发布日期:2021-03-31
作者简介:李慧莉(1972—),女,博士,高级工程师,主要从事石油地质综合研究工作。地址:(100083)北京市海淀区学院路31号中国石化石油勘探开发研究院。Email:lihl.syky@sinopec.com。
基金资助:
中国石化科技部项目“巴麦地区油气成藏条件与勘探方向研究”（编号：P15090）和中国科学院战略性先导科技专项（A类） “深层油气勘探目标评价与优选” （编号：XDA14010406）联合资助

Characteristics of breccia reservoir of Tuylock Formation of well Beixin-1 in Markit Slope of Tarim Basin

LI Huili¹, YOU Donghua², LI Jianjiao¹, TAN Guanghui³, LIU Shilin⁴

1. Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Production, Sinopec, Beijing 100083, China;
2. Wuxi Research Institute of Petroleum Geology, Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Production, Sinopec, Wuxi 214126, Jiangsu, China;
3. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, Sinopec Northwest Oilfield Company, Urumqi 830011, China;
4. Department of Oilfield Exploration & Development, Sinopec, Beijing 100728, China

Received:2020-09-06 Revised:2020-10-13 Online:2021-04-01 Published:2021-03-31

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 塔里木盆地麦盖提斜坡北新1井首次在古近系阿尔塔什组膏盐岩之下揭示了一套吐依洛克组白云质角砾岩和白云岩储层，并且获得油气发现。为明确储层发育特征，利用测试产层段连续取心获得的实物资料，开展储层物性、储集空间、成岩作用及成因研究。结果表明：白云质角砾岩储层具有良好的储层物性；裂缝和溶蚀孔洞主要分布在角砾状粉晶云岩与粉晶云岩段，是其主要的储集空间。准同生期和成岩早期的膏溶作用和喜山期的构造破裂作用是主要的建设性成岩作用。白云质角砾岩的原始沉积环境为局限潮坪或泻湖相，准同生期发生普遍的膏溶作用和喜山期遭受构造破裂作用是白云质角砾岩储层的两大建设性作用。

关键词: 储层特征, 角砾岩储层, 膏溶作用, 构造破裂, 吐依洛克组, 麦盖提斜坡, 塔里木盆地

Abstract: A set of dolomite and dolomitic breccia reservoir covered by the gypsum bed of Aertashi Formation was firstly drilled in well Beixin-1 in Markit Slope of Tarim Basin,which obtained oil and gas discovery. In order to define reservoir characteristics,studies on reservoir physical properties,reservoir space,diagenesis and genesis were carried out by using the data obtained from continuous coring of the test production section. The results show that the dolomitic breccia reservoir has good reservoir physical properties,and fractures, dissolved pores and cavities are the main types of reservoir space,which mainly distributed in the brecciated silty dolomites and silty dolomites. The gypsum dissolution in the para-syngenetic period and early diagenetic stage and the tectonic rupture in Himalayan tectonic movement are the mainly constructive diagenesis. The original sedimentary environment of dolomitic breccia was limited tidal flat or lagoon, and the reservoir was developed by gypsum dissolution,and reformed by tectonic rupture during the Himalayan period.

Key words: reservoir characteristics, breccia reservoir, gypsum dissolution, tectonic rupture, Tuylock Formation, Markit Slope, Tarim Basin

中图分类号:

TE122.2

李慧莉, 尤东华, 李建交, 谭广辉, 刘士林. 麦盖提斜坡北新1井吐依洛克组角砾岩储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 26–35.

LI Huili, YOU Donghua, LI Jianjiao, TAN Guanghui, LIU Shilin. Characteristics of breccia reservoir of Tuylock Formation of well Beixin-1 in Markit Slope of Tarim Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(2): 26–35.

参考文献

[1] 罗少辉, 李九梅, 王辉. 塔里木盆地麦盖提斜坡皮山北新1井白云质角砾岩时代厘定. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(5):1405-1415. LUO S H, LI J M, WANG H. Age determination of dolomite breccia in Well PSBX1 of Markit Slope in Tarim Basin. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(5):1405-1415.
[2] 李建交, 李慧莉, 郭宪璞, 等. 塔里木盆地皮山北新1井角砾岩段地层时代归属讨论. 地球科学前沿, 2019, 9(12):1310-1318. LI J J, LI H L, GUO X P, et al. A discuss on geologic time of metamorphosed strata of breccia section of Well PBX 1 in Tarim Basin. China Advances in Geosciences, 2019, 9(12):1310-1318.
[3] 岳勇,田景春,赵应权. 塔里木盆地南部皮山北新1井角砾岩的地层归属、成因及油气勘探意义. 地球科学, 2019, 44(11):3894-3909. YUE Y, TIAN J C, ZHAO Y Q. Stratigraphy,origin and significance of oil and gas exploration of Cretaceous breccia in Well PBX1, Southwestern Tarim Basin. Earth Science, 2019, 44(11):3894-3909.
[4] 张长建, 刘少杰, 罗少辉, 等. 塔里木盆地皮山破火山口构造及其油气地质意义. 新疆石油地质, 2016, 37(3):281-285. ZHANG C J, LUI S J, LUO S H, et al. Structure and geological significance of Pishan caldera in Tarim Basin. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2016, 37(3):281-285.
[5] 吕海涛, 顾忆, 丁勇, 等. 塔里木盆地西南部皮山北新1井白垩系油气成因. 石油实验地质, 2016, 38(1):84-90. LYU H T, GU Y, DING Y, et al. Cretaceous petroleum origin in well PSBX1 in the southwestern Tarim Basin. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2016, 38(1):84-90.
[6] 岳勇, 田景春, 赵应权, 等. 塔里木盆地和田古隆起对奥陶系油气成藏的控制作用. 地球科学, 2018, 43(11):4215-4225. YUE Y, TIAN J C, ZHAO Y Q, et al. Control of Hetian PaleoUplift on hydrocarbon accumulation of Ordovician, Tarim Basin. Earth Science, 2018, 43(11):4215-4225.
[7] 李慧莉, 刘士林, 杨圣彬, 等. 塔中-巴麦地区构造沉积演化及其对奥陶系储层的控制. 石油与天然气地质, 2014, 35(6):883-892. LI H L, LIU S L, YANG S B, et al. Tectonic sedimentary evolution of Tazhong-Bachu-Maigaiti area and its control on the Ordovician. Oil & Gas Geology, 2014, 35(6):883-892.
[8] 吕海涛, 张仲培, 邵志兵, 等. 塔里木盆地巴楚-麦盖提地区早古生代古隆起的演化及其勘探意义. 石油与天然气地质, 2011, 31(1):76-83. LYU H T, ZHANG Z P, SHAO Z B, et al. Structural evolution and exploration significance of early Paleozoic palaeouplifts in Bachu-Maigaiti area, the Tarim Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 2011, 31(1):76-83.
[9] 郭宪璞, 丁孝忠, 赵子然, 等. 塔里木盆地西南地区晚白垩世中晚期海相性南北分异研究. 地质论评, 2018, 64(5):1078-1086. GUO X P, DING X Z, ZHAO Z R, et al. The north-south differentiation on the marine feature in the Southwest Tarim Basin during middle-late of the Late Cretaceous. Geological Review, 2018, 64(5):1078-1086.
[10] 林畅松, 李思田, 刘景彦, 等. 塔里木盆地古生代重要演化阶段的古构造格局与古地理演化. 岩石学报, 2011, 27(1):210-218. LIN C S, LI S T, LIU J Y, et al. Tectonic framework and paleogeographic evolution of Tarim Basin during the Paleozoic major evolutionary stage. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2011, 27(1):210-218.
[11] 赵宗举, 吴兴宇, 潘文庆, 等. 塔里木盆地奥陶纪层序岩相古地理. 沉积学报, 2009, 27(5):939-955. ZHAO Z J, WU X Y, PAN W Q, et al. Sequence lithofacies paleogeograthy of Ordovician in Tarim Basin. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2009, 27(5):939-955.
[12] 胡文瑄, 陈琪, 王小林, 等. 白云岩储层形成演化过程中不同流体作用的稀土元素判别模式. 石油与天然气地质, 2010, 31(6):810-818. HU W X, CHEN Q, WANG X L, et al. REE models for the distribution of fluids in the formation and evolution of dolomite reservoirs. Oil & Gas Geology, 2010, 31(6):810-818.
[13] 罗清清, 刘波, 姜伟民, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地中部奥陶系马家沟组五段白云岩储层成岩作用及孔隙演化. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(1):102-115. LUO Q Q, LIU B, JIANG W M, et al. Diagenesis and pore evolution of dolomite reservoir in the 5th member of the Ordovician Majiagou Formation, central Ordos Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(1):102-115.
[14] 王文凯, 许国明, 宋晓波, 等. 四川盆地雷口坡组膏盐岩成因及其油气地质意义. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 44(6):697-707. WANG W K, XU G M, SONG X B, et al. Genesis of gypsumsalt in the Leikoupo Formation and its hydrocarbon significance in the Sichuan Basin, China. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition), 2017, 44(6):697-707.
[15] 丁孝忠, 郭宪璞, 彭阳, 等. 新疆塔里木盆地白垩纪-第三纪层序地层学研究. 地球学报, 2002, 23(3):243-248. DING X Z, GUO X P, PENG Y, et al. A study of the CretaceousTertiary sequence stratigraphy of Tarim Basin, Xinjiang. Acta Geoscientia Sinica, 2002, 23(3):243-248.
[16] 庄红红, 郭峰, 周雪. 塔西南昆仑山前地区晚白垩世沉积演化. 西安科技大学学报, 2013, 33(1):39-45. ZHUANG H H, GUO F, ZHOU X. Evolution of sedimentary environment in Late Cretaceous, Kunlun Mountain Front, Tarim Basin. Journal of Xi'an University of Science and Technology, 2013, 33(1):39-45.
[17] 桑洪, 曹养同, 朱礼春, 等. 塔西南坳陷中新生代蒸发岩沉积初探. 古地理学报, 2014, 16(4):473-482. SANG H, CAO Y T, ZHU L C, et al. Preliminary study of evaporates deposition from the Mesozoic to Cenozoic in southwestern Tarim Depression. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2014, 16(4):473-482.
[18] 张华, 刘成林, 焦鹏程, 等. 塔西南坳陷古新统蒸发岩沉积条件及成因模式初探. 地质学报, 2015, 89(11):2028-2035. ZHANG H, LIU C L, JIAO P C, et al. Sedimentary condition and genetic mode of Paleocene evaporites in the southwestern Depression of the Tarim Basin. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2015, 89(11):2028-2035.
[19] 黄华, 袁娟梅, 彭伟, 等. 江汉盆地古近系潜江组盐湖沉积特征与成藏模式. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 33(2):9-16. HUANG H, YUAN J M, PENG W, et al. Sedimentary characteristics and reservoir accumulation model of salt lake of Paleogene Qianjiang Formation in Qianjiang Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 33(2):9-16.
[20] 黄健玲, 傅强, 邱旭明, 等. 咸化断陷湖盆混积岩特征及沉积模式. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2):54-66. HUANG J L, FU Q, QIU X M, et al. Characteristics and sedimentary models of diamictite in saline faulted lacustrine basin:a case study of Fu 2 member in Jinhu Sag, Subei Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(2):54-66.
[21] 毛光周, 刘晓通, 安鹏瑞, 等. 无机地球化学指标在古盐度恢复中的应用及展望. 山东科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 37(1):92-102. MAO G Z, LIU X T, AN P R, et al. Application and outlook of inorganic geochemical in indexes reconstruction of palaeosalinity. Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology(Natural Science), 2018, 37(1):92-102.
[22] 雷卞军, 阙洪培, 胡宁, 等. 鄂西古生代硅质岩的地球化学特征及沉积环境. 沉积与特提斯地质, 2002, 22(2):70-79. LEI B J, QUE H P, HU N, et al. Geochemistry and sedimentary environments of the Paleozoic siliceous rocks in western Hubei. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 2002, 22(2):70-79.
[23] 孟苗苗, 康志宏, 樊太亮, 等. 痕量元素和碳氧同位素在塔里木盆地西南缘棋盘组沉积环境研究中的应用. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 43(1):77-85. MENG M M, KANG Z H, FAN T L, et al. Application of trace elements and carbon-oxygen isotopes on the research of sedimentary environment of Qipan Formation in the southwest margin of Tarim Basin, China. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition), 2016, 43(1):77-85.
[24] 熊小辉, 肖加飞. 沉积环境的地球化学示踪. 地球与环境, 2011, 39(3):405-414. XIONG X H, XIAO J F. Geochemical indicators of sedimentary environments:a summary. Earth and Environment, 2011, 39(3):405-414.
[25] HATCH J R, LEVENTHAL J S. Relationship between inferred redox potential of depositional environment and geochemistry of the Upper Pennaylvanian (Missourian) Stark Shale member of the Dennis Limestone, Wabaunsee County, Kansas, USA. Chemical Geology, 1994, 99(1/3):65-82.
[26] 何文渊, 李江海, 钱祥麟, 等. 塔里木盆地巴楚断隆中新生代的构造演化. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2000, 36(4):539-545. HE W Y, LI J H, QIAN X L, et al. The Meso-Cenozoic evolution of Bachu fault-uplift in Tarim Basin. Acta Scicentiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2000, 36(4):539-545.
[27] 解巧明, 王震亮, 尹成明, 等. 塔里木盆地塔西南坳陷英吉沙与皮山地区构造演化特征及对油气成藏的影响. 石油实验地质, 2019, 41(2):165-175. XIE Q M, WANG Z L, YIN C M, et al. Tectonic evolution characteristics of Yingjisha and Pishan areas and the influence on petroleum accumulation in the southwest depression, Tarim Basin. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2019, 41(2):165-175.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

麦盖提斜坡北新1井吐依洛克组角砾岩储层特征

Characteristics of breccia reservoir of Tuylock Formation of well Beixin-1 in Markit Slope of Tarim Basin

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	尹兴平, 蒋裕强, 付永红, 张雪梅, 雷治安, 陈超, 张海杰. 渝西地区五峰组—龙马溪组龙一₁亚段页岩岩相及储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 41-51.
[2]	严敏, 赵靖舟, 曹青, 吴和源, 黄延昭. 鄂尔多斯盆地临兴地区二叠系石盒子组储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 49-58.
[3]	李祖兵, 崔俊峰, 宋舜尧, 成亚斌, 卢异, 陈岑. 黄骅坳陷北大港潜山中生界碎屑岩储层特征及成因机理[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 81-92.
[4]	张治恒, 田继军, 韩长城, 张文文, 邓守伟, 孙国祥. 吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 116-126.
[5]	袁纯, 张惠良, 王波. 大型辫状河三角洲砂体构型与储层特征——以库车坳陷北部阿合组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 73-84.
[6]	庞小军, 王清斌, 解婷, 赵梦, 冯冲. 黄河口凹陷北缘古近系物源及其对优质储层的控制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 1-13.
[7]	田清华, 刘俊, 张晨, 王文胜, 黄丹. 苏里格气田下古生界储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 33-42.
[8]	李宏涛, 马立元, 史云清, 胡向阳, 高君, 李浩. 基于井-震结合的水下分流河道砂岩储层展布分析与评价——以什邡气藏JP₃⁵砂组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 78-89.
[9]	赵超峰, 贾振甲, 田建涛, 高荣锦, 张伟, 赵建宇. 基于井中微地震监测方法的压裂效果评价——以吉林探区Y22井为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 161-168.
[10]	郭艳琴, 何子琼, 郭彬程, 惠磊, 蔡志成, 王美霞, 李文厚, 李百强. 苏里格气田东南部盒8段致密砂岩储层特征及评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(5): 1-11.
[11]	王桂成, 曹聪. 鄂尔多斯盆地下寺湾油田长3油层组储层特征及控藏机理[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(3): 1-9.
[12]	王良军. 川北地区灯影组四段优质储层特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(2): 35-45.
[13]	刘雁婷. 川东北地区长兴组—飞仙关组储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(1): 78-86.
[14]	任大忠, 张晖, 周然, 王茜, 黄海, 唐胜蓝, 金娜. 塔里木盆地克深地区巴什基奇克组致密砂岩储层敏感性研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(6): 27-36.
[15]	仲米虹, 唐武. 前陆盆地隆后坳陷区湖底扇沉积特征及主控因素——以塔北轮南地区三叠系为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(5): 18-28.