岩性油气藏 ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1): 98–110.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20240110

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

准噶尔盆地沙湾凹陷三叠系百口泉组沉积相展布特征及沉积模式

王天海1,2, 许多年3, 吴涛4, 关新3, 谢再波1,2, 陶辉飞1   

  1. 1. 中国科学院 西北生态环境资源研究院, 甘肃 兰州 730000;
    2. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
    3. 中国石油勘探开发研究院 西北分院, 甘肃 兰州 730020;
    4. 中国石油新疆油田公司 勘探开发研究院, 新疆 克拉玛依 834000
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-13 修回日期:2022-11-08 出版日期:2024-01-01 发布日期:2024-01-02
  • 第一作者:王天海(1997-),男,中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院在读硕士研究生,研究方向为油气地球物理勘探。地址:(730000)甘肃省兰州市城关区东岗西路382号。Email:863416324@qq.com。
  • 通信作者: 陶辉飞(1983-),男,博士,副研究员,主要从事含油气盆地及沉积地质学方面的研究工作。Email:tophic3@yeah.net。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目“陆相湖盆水下滑坡体的形成机制、识别标志及其石油地质意义”(编号:41872116)资助。

Sedimentary facies distribution characteristics and sedimentary model of Triassic Baikouquan Formation in Shawan Sag,Junggar Basin

WANG Tianhai1,2, XU Duonian3, WU Tao4, GUAN Xin3, XIE Zaibo1,2, TAO Huifei1   

  1. 1. Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China;
    2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
    3. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development-Northwest, Lanzhou 730020, China;
    4. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company, Karamay 834000, Xinjiang, China
  • Received:2022-10-13 Revised:2022-11-08 Online:2024-01-01 Published:2024-01-02

摘要: 准噶尔盆地沙湾凹陷三叠系百口泉组主要发育扇三角洲沉积,准确识别扇三角洲各沉积相的展布特征对多类型油气藏的勘探开发具有重要意义。结合高精度三维开发地震和大量钻井、测井资料,采用沉积相研究、地震属性分析和古地貌恢复等方法,对沙湾凹陷百口泉组沉积相展布特征进行了研究。研究结果表明: ①沙湾凹陷百口泉组可划分出3个四级层序和数个五级层序,且3个四级层序分别对应百口泉组的3个层段,五级层序受短期沉积旋回控制,分别对应不同的沉积微相。②均方根振幅属性对岩性变化更为敏感,能量高值区对应扇三角洲平原亚相,中值区对应扇三角洲前缘亚相,低能量区对应滨浅湖亚相。③百一段和百二段沉积时期,研究区湖盆面积小,主要发育扇三角洲平原和前缘亚相;百三段沉积时期湖盆面积增大,主要发育扇三角洲前缘和滨浅湖亚相,为典型的水进退积型扇三角洲。扇三角洲前缘亚相物性较好,被滨浅湖亚相的泥质岩所覆盖,形成良好的储盖组合。④研究区百口泉组扇体规模大、物源近,岩性以砂砾岩为主,为缓坡浅水扇三角洲沉积模式,扇三角洲前缘亚相为潜在的有利成藏区,是油气资源规模发现的重点勘探区。

关键词: 扇三角洲, 砂砾岩, 古地貌, 沉积相, 缓坡浅水扇三角洲沉积模式, 百口泉组, 三叠系, 沙湾凹陷, 准噶尔盆地

Abstract: The Triassic Baikouquan Formation in Shawan Sag of Junggar Basin mainly develops fan delta deposits. Accurately identifying the distribution characteristics of each sedimentary facies of the fan delta is of great significance for the exploration and development of multi-type oil and gas reservoirs. Combined with high-precision three-dimensional development seismic and a large number of drilling and logging data, the distribution characteristics of sedimentary facies of Baikouquan Formation in Shawan Sag were studied by means of sedimentary facies research, seismic attribute analysis and paleotopography restoration. The results show that:(1) Baikouquan Formation in Shawan Sag can be divided into three fourth-order sequences and several fifth-order sequences. The three fourth-order sequences correspond to three members of Baikouquan Formation, and the fifth-order sequences are controlled by short-term sedimentary cycles, corresponding to different sedimentary microfacies.(2) The root mean square amplitude attribute is more sensitive to the lithology change of the target layer. The high energy zones are expressed as fan delta plain subfacies, the middle energy zones are expressed as fan delta front subfacies, and the low energy zones are expressed as the shore shallow lake subfacies.(3) During the sedimentary period of the first and second members of Baikouquan Formation, the lake basin area of the study area is small, and the fan delta plain and front subfacies are mainly developed. During the sedimentary period of the third member of Baikouquan Formation, the lake basin area is expanded, and the fan delta front and shore-shallow lake subfacies are mainly developed, which is a typical transgressive retrograding fan delta. The fan delta front subfacies have good physical properties, and are covered by mudstone of shore-shallow lake subfacies, forming a good reservoircap assemblage.(4) The Baikouquan Formation in the study area has a large scale of fan bodies and close source rocks, with lithologies mainly of sandy conglomerate, which is a gentle slope shallow water fan delta sedimentary model. The front subfacies of fan delta are potential favorable reservoir accumulation areas, which are key exploration areas for the discovery of oil and gas resources.

Key words: fan delta, sandy conglomerate, paleotopography, sedimentary facies, gentle slope shallow water fan delta sedimentary model, Baikouquan Formation, Triassic, Shawan Sag, Junggar Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2
[1] 郑超, 刘宜文, 魏凌云, 等. 准噶尔盆地南缘霍尔果斯背斜构造解析及有利区带预测[J]. 断块油气田, 2015, 22(6):692-695. ZHENG Chao, LIU Yiwen, WEI Lingyun, et al. Analysis of Horgos anticline in southern margin of Junggar Basin and prediction of favorable zone[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2015, 22(6):692-695.
[2] 匡立春, 唐勇, 雷德文, 等. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷斜坡区三叠系百口泉组扇控大面积岩性油藏勘探实践[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2014, 19(6):14-23. KUANG Lichun, TANG Yong, LEI Dewen, et al. Exploration of fan-controlled large-area lithologic oil reservoirs of Triassic Baikouquan Formation in slope zone of Mahu Depression in Junggar Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2014, 19(6):14-23.
[3] 周路, 朱江坤, 宋永, 等. 玛湖凹陷玛中-玛东地区三叠系百口泉组断裂特征及控藏作用分析[J]. 地学前缘, 2019, 26(1):248-261. ZHOU Lu, ZHU Jiangkun, SONG Yong, et al. Analysis of fault characteristics and reservoir control in Triassic Baikouquan Formation in central and eastern Mahu Depression[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2019, 26(1):248-261.
[4] 宫清顺, 黄革萍, 倪国辉, 等. 准噶尔盆地乌尔禾油田百口泉组冲积扇沉积特征及油气勘探意义[J]. 沉积学报, 2010, 28(6):1135-1144. GONG Qingshun, HUANG Geping, NI Guohui, et al. Characteristics of alluvial fan in Baikouquan Formation of Wuerhe oil field in Junggar Basin and petroleum prospecting significance[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2010, 28(6):1135-1144.
[5] 邹妞妞, 史基安, 张大权, 等. 准噶尔盆地西北缘玛北地区百口泉组扇三角洲沉积模式[J]. 沉积学报, 2015, 33(3):607-615. ZOU Niuniu, SHI Ji'an, ZHANG Daquan, et al. Fan delta depositional model of Triassic Baikouquan Formation in Mabei area, NW Junggar Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2015, 33(3):607-615.
[6] 瞿建华, 张顺存, 李辉, 等. 玛北地区三叠系百口泉组油藏成藏控制因素[J]. 特种油气藏, 2013, 20(5):51-56. QU Jianhua, ZHANG Shuncun, LI Hui, et al. Control factors of the Triassic Baikouquan reservoirs in Mabei area of Junggar Basin[J]. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs, 2013, 20(5):51-56.
[7] 唐勇, 徐洋, 李亚哲, 等. 玛湖凹陷大型浅水退覆式扇三角洲沉积模式及勘探意义[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2018, 39(1):16-22. TANG Yong, XU Yang, LI Yazhe, et al. Sedimentation model and exploration significance of large-scaled shallow retrogradation fan delta in Mahu Sag[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2018, 39(1):16-22.
[8] 唐勇, 徐洋, 瞿建华, 等. 玛湖凹陷百口泉组扇三角洲群特征及分布[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2014, 35(6):628-635. TANG Yong, XU Yang, QU Jianhua, et al. Fan-delta group characteristics and its distribution of the Triassic Baikouquan reservoirs in Mahu Sag of Junggar Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2014, 35(6):628-635.
[9] 潘进, 张昌民, 庞雷, 等. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷夏子街扇区三叠系百口泉组沉积演化特征[J]. 古地理学报, 2019, 21(6):913-924. PAN Jin, ZHANG Changmin, PANG Lei, et al. Depositional evolution characteristics of the Triassic Baikouquan Formation in Xiazijie fan area of Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography(Chinese Edition), 2019, 21(6):913-924.
[10] 张顺存, 蒋欢, 张磊, 等. 准噶尔盆地玛北地区三叠系百口泉组优质储层成因分析[J]. 沉积学报, 2014, 32(6):1171-1180. ZHANG Shuncun, JIANG Huan, ZHANG Lei, et al. Genetic analysis of the high quality reservoir of Triassic Baikouquan Formation in Mabei region, Junggar Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2014, 32(6):1171-1180.
[11] WILLIAM E, GALLOWAY. Sediments and stratigraphic framework of the copper river fan-delta, Alaska[J]. SEPM Journal of Sedimentary Research, 1976, 46(3):726-737.
[12] WESCOTT W A, ETHRIDGE F G. Fan-delta sedimentology and tectonic setting:Yallahs fan delta, southeast Jamaica[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1980, 64(3):374-399.
[13] 谭开俊, 王国栋, 罗惠芬, 等. 准噶尔盆地玛湖斜坡区三叠系百口泉组储层特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(6):83-88. TAN Kaijun, WANG Guodong, LUO Huifen, et al. Reservoir characteristics and controlling factors of the Triassic Baikouquan Formation in Mahu slope area, Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2014, 26(6):83-88.
[14] 邹妞妞, 张大权, 钱海涛, 等. 准噶尔盆地玛北斜坡区扇三角洲砂砾岩储层主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(4):24-33. ZOU Niuniu, ZHANG Daquan, QIAN Haitao, et al. Main controlling factors of glutenite reservoir of fan delta in Mabei slope, Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(4):24-33.
[15] 陈新, 卢华复, 舒良树, 等. 准噶尔盆地构造演化分析新进展[J]. 高校地质学报, 2002, 8(3):257-267. CHEN Xin, LU Huafu, SHU Liangshu, et al. Study on tectonic evolution of Junggar Basin[J]. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2002, 8(3):257-267.
[16] 陈发景, 汪新文, 汪新伟. 准噶尔盆地的原型和构造演化[J]. 地学前缘, 2005, 12(3):77-89. CHEN Fajing, WANG Xinwen, WANG Xinwei. Prototype and tectonic evolution of the Junggar Basin,northwestern China[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2005, 12(3):77-89.
[17] 况军. 地体拼贴与准噶尔盆地的形成演化[J]. 新疆石油地质, 1993, 14(2):126-132. KUANG Jun. Terrene connection, formation and evolution of Junggar Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 1993, 14(2):126-132.
[18] ŞENGÖR A M C, NATAL'IN B A, BURTMAN V S. Evolution of the Altaid tectonics collage and Paleozoic crustal growth in Eurasia[J]. Nature, 1993, 364(6435):299-307.
[19] 梁宇生, 何登发, 甄宇, 等. 准噶尔盆地沙湾凹陷构造-地层层序与盆地演化[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(5):943-954. LIANG Yusheng, HE Dengfa, ZHEN Yu, et al. Tectono-stratigraphic sequence and basin evolution of Shawan sag in the Junggar Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2018, 39(5):943-954.
[20] 吴绍祖, 屈迅, 李强. 准噶尔早三叠世古地理及古气候特征[J]. 新疆地质, 2000, 18(4):339-341. WU Shaozu, QU Xun, LI Qiang. Palaeogeography and palaeoclimate of the early Triassic in Jungger[J]. Xinjiang Geology, 2000, 18(4):339-341.
[21] 杜金虎, 支东明, 唐勇, 等. 准噶尔盆地上二叠统风险领域分析与沙湾凹陷战略发现[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(1):24-35. DU Jinhu, ZHI Dongming, TANG Yong, et al. Prospects in Upper Permian and strategic discovery in Shawan Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(1):24-35.
[22] 何苗, 张利伟, 刘勇, 等. 准噶尔盆地西北缘三叠纪沉积体系与环境[J]. 地质通报, 2017, 36(6):1032-1042. HE Miao, ZHANG Liwei, LIU Yong, et al. Sedimentary system and environment research on the Triassic strata in northwest Junggar Basin[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2017, 36(6):1032-1042.
[23] 唐勇, 郭文建, 王霞田, 等. 玛湖凹陷砾岩大油区勘探新突破及启示[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2019, 40(2):127-137. TANG Yong, GUO Wenjian, WANG Xiatian, et al. A new breakthrough in exploration of large conglomerate oil province in Mahu Sag and its implications[J], Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2019, 40(2):127-137.
[24] 秦国省, 邹存友, 赖令彬, 等. 准噶尔盆地西北缘百口泉地区三叠系冲积沉积体系与油气成藏[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(6):1197-1211. QIN Guosheng, ZOU Cunyou, LAI Lingbin, et al. Alluvial depositional system and its controlling effect on hydrocarbon accumulation of the Triassic in the Baikouquan area, northwestern Junggar Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(6):1197-1211.
[25] 李全, 李培俊, 倪振, 等. 玛湖西斜坡百口泉组扇三角洲地震沉积学研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(2):15-26. LI Quan, LI Peijun, NI Zhen, et al. Seismic sedimentary study on the fan-delta of the Baikouquan Formation on the western slope of the Mahu Sag[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2020, 42(2):15-26.
[26] 郑超, 李静, 高达, 等. 沙湾凹陷百口泉组层序地层及沉积体系研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2017, 24(6):48-54. ZHENG Chao, LI Jing, GAO Da, et al. Study on sequence stratigraphy and deposit systems of the Baikouquan Formation in Shawan Sag[J]. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs, 2017, 24(6):48-54.
[27] 林畅松, 刘景彦, 刘丽军, 等. 高精度层序地层分析:建立沉积相和储层规模的等时地层格架[J]. 现代地质, 2002, 16(3):276-281. LIN Changsong, LIU Jingyan, LIU Lijun, et al. High resolution sequence stratigraphy analysis:Construction of chronostratigraphic sequence framework on facies and reservoir scale[J]. Geoscience, 2002, 16(3):276-281.
[28] 陈丽华, 路言秋, 徐怀民, 等. 扇三角洲相高分辨率层序地层研究:以克拉玛依油田百21井区克上组油藏为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(1):30-35. CHEN Lihua, LU Yanqiu, XU Huaimin, et al. High resolution sequence stratigraphy in fan delta facies:A case study from Upper Karamay Formation reservoir in Bai-21 well area in Karamay Oilfield[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2012, 24(1):30-35.
[29] 袁新涛, 沈平平. 高分辨率层序框架内小层综合对比方法[J]. 石油学报, 2007, 28(6):87-91. YUAN Xintao, SHEN Pingping. Continental strata correlation of high-resolution sequence in reservoir development phase[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2007, 28(6):87-91.
[30] 董艳蕾, 朱筱敏, 耿晓洁, 等. 利用地层切片研究陆相湖盆深水滑塌浊积扇沉积特征[J]. 地学前缘, 2015, 22(1):386-396. DONG Yanlei, ZHU Xiaomin, GENG Xiaojie, et al. Using the stratal slice to study the depositional characteristics of deep-water slumped turbidite fans in continental lake basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2015, 22(1):386-396.
[31] 宋传春. 地震-地质综合研究方法述评[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(2):133-139. SONG Chuanchun. Review of comprehensive study methods for seismics-geology[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2010, 22(2):133-139.
[32] 李兴, 张立强, 施辉, 等. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷百口泉组沉积古环境分析:以玛18井为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(2):80-85. LI Xing, ZHANG Liqiang, SHI Hui, et al. Sedimentary environment of Lower Triassic Baikouquan Formation in Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin:A case study from Ma 18 well[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(2):80-85.
[33] 关新, 潘树新, 曲永强, 等. 准噶尔盆地沙湾凹陷滩坝砂的发现及油气勘探潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1):90-98. GUAN Xin, PAN Shuxin, QU Yongqiang, et al. Discovery and hydrocarbon exploration potential of beach-bar sand in Shawan Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(1):90-98.
[34] 张顺存, 邹妞妞, 史基安, 等. 准噶尔盆地玛北地区三叠系百口泉组沉积模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2015, 36(4):640-650. ZHANG Shuncun, ZOU Niuniu, SHI Ji'an, et al. Depositional model of the Triassic Baikouquan Formation in Mabei area of Junggar Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2015, 36(4):640-650.
[35] 杨凡凡, 姚宗全, 杨帆, 等. 准噶尔盆地玛北地区三叠系百口泉组岩石物理相[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1):99-108. YANG Fanfan, YAO Zongquan, YANG Fan, et al. Petrophysical facies of Triassic Baikouquan Formation in northern Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(1):99-108.
[36] 曾洪流, 朱筱敏, 朱如凯, 等. 陆相坳陷型盆地地震沉积学研究规范[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(3):275-284. ZENG Hongliu, ZHU Xiaomin, ZHU Rukai, et al. Guidelines for seismic sedimentologic study in non-marine postrift basins[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(3):275-284.
[37] LI Na, ZHANG Jinliang, SHEN Wenlong, et al. Recovery of the erosion thickness and characterization of the paleogeomorphology in the southern Lishui Sag, East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Journal of Ocean University of China, 2020, 19(2):320-330.
[38] 吴崇筠, 薛叔浩. 中国含油气盆地沉积学[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社, 1993. WU Chongjun, XUE Shuhao. Sedimentology of petroliferous basins in China[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 1993.
[1] 赵军, 李勇, 文晓峰, 徐文远, 焦世祥. 基于斑马算法优化支持向量回归机模型预测页岩地层压力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 12-22.
[2] 余琪祥, 罗宇, 段铁军, 李勇, 宋在超, 韦庆亮. 准噶尔盆地环东道海子凹陷侏罗系煤层气成藏条件及勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 45-55.
[3] 白玉彬, 李梦瑶, 朱涛, 赵靖舟, 任海姣, 吴伟涛, 吴和源. 玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组烃源岩地球化学特征及页岩油“甜点”评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 110-121.
[4] 乔桐, 刘成林, 杨海波, 王义凤, 李剑, 田继先, 韩杨, 张景坤. 准噶尔盆地盆1井西凹陷侏罗系三工河组凝析气藏特征及成因机制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 169-180.
[5] 李道清, 陈永波, 杨东, 李啸, 苏航, 周俊峰, 仇庭聪, 石小茜. 准噶尔盆地白家海凸起侏罗系西山窑组煤岩气“甜点”储层智能综合预测技术[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 23-35.
[6] 魏成林, 张凤奇, 江青春, 鲁雪松, 刘刚, 卫延召, 李树博, 蒋文龙. 准噶尔盆地阜康凹陷东部深层二叠系超压形成机制及演化特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 167-177.
[7] 杨海波, 冯德浩, 杨小艺, 郭文建, 韩杨, 苏加佳, 杨皩, 刘成林. 准噶尔盆地东道海子凹陷二叠系平地泉组烃源岩特征及热演化史模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 156-166.
[8] 尹虎, 屈红军, 孙晓晗, 杨博, 张磊岗, 朱荣幸. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南部三叠系长7油层组深水沉积特征及演化规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 145-155.
[9] 王子昕, 柳广弟, 袁光杰, 杨恒林, 付利, 王元, 陈刚, 张恒. 鄂尔多斯盆地庆城地区三叠系长7段烃源岩特征及控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 133-144.
[10] 周洪锋, 吴海红, 杨禹希, 向红英, 高吉宏, 贺昊文, 赵旭. 二连盆地巴音都兰凹陷B51井区白垩系阿四段扇三角洲前缘沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 85-97.
[11] 王同川, 陈浩如, 温龙彬, 钱玉贵, 李玉琢, 文华国. 川东五百梯地区石炭系岩溶古地貌识别及储集意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 109-121.
[12] 田亚, 李军辉, 陈方举, 李跃, 刘华晔, 邹越, 张晓扬. 海拉尔盆地中部断陷带下白垩统南屯组致密储层特征及有利区预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 136-146.
[13] 牟蜚声, 尹相东, 胡琮, 张海峰, 陈世加, 代林锋, 陆奕帆. 鄂尔多斯盆地陕北地区三叠系长7段致密油分布特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 71-84.
[14] 冯斌, 黄晓波, 何幼斌, 李华, 罗进雄, 李涛, 周晓光. 渤海湾盆地庙西北地区古近系沙河街组三段源-汇系统重建[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 84-95.
[15] 卞保力, 刘海磊, 蒋文龙, 王学勇, 丁修建. 准噶尔盆地盆1井西凹陷石炭系火山岩凝析气藏的发现与勘探启示[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 96-105.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 段天向, 刘晓梅, 张亚军, 肖述琴. Petrel 建模中的几点认识[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 102 -107 .
[2] 张立秋. 南二区东部二类油层上返层系组合优化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 116 -120 .
[3] 张娣,侯中健,王亚辉,王莹,王春联. 板桥—北大港地区沙河街组沙一段湖相碳酸盐岩沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(4): 92 -97 .
[4] 樊怀才,李晓平,窦天财,吴欣袁. 应力敏感效应的气井流量动态特征研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(4): 130 -134 .
[5] 田淑芳,张鸿文. 应用生命周期旋回理论预测辽河油田石油探明储量增长趋势[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 98 -100 .
[6] 杨凯,郭肖. 裂缝性低渗透油藏三维两相黑油数值模拟研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(3): 118 -121 .
[7] 翟中喜,秦伟军,郭金瑞. 油气充满度与储层通道渗流能力的定量关系———以泌阳凹陷双河油田岩性油藏为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(4): 92 -95 .
[8] 戚明辉,陆正元,袁帅,李新华. 塔河油田12 区块油藏水体来源及出水特征分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(4): 115 -119 .
[9] 李相博,陈启林,刘化清,完颜容,慕敬魁,廖建波,魏立花. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组3种沉积物重力流及其含油气性[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(3): 16 -21 .
[10] 刘云, 卢渊,伊向艺,张俊良,张锦良,王振喜. 天然气水合物预测模型及其影响因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(3): 124 -127 .