岩性油气藏 ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (5): 87–98.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20240509

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

川东北五宝场地区侏罗系沙溪庙组储层特征及主控因素

张晓丽1, 王小娟1, 张航2, 陈沁3, 关旭1, 赵正望1, 王昌勇4, 谈曜杰4   

  1. 1. 中国石油西南油气田公司 勘探开发研究院, 成都 610041;
    2. 中国石油西南油气田公司 川东北气矿, 四川 达州 635000;
    3. 中国石油西南油气田公司 开发事业部, 成都 610041;
    4. 成都理工大学 沉积地质研究院, 成都 610059
  • 收稿日期:2023-06-28 修回日期:2023-10-25 出版日期:2024-09-01 发布日期:2024-09-04
  • 第一作者:张晓丽（1987—），女，硕士，工程师，主要从事油气勘探方面的研究工作。地址：（610041）成都市高新区天府大道北段12号西南油气田公司勘探开发研究院。Email：zhangxiaoli01@petrochina.com.cn。
  • 通信作者: 王昌勇（1981—），男，副教授，硕士生导师，主要从事沉积学、层序地层学及储层地质学的教学和科研工作。Email：wangchangyong09@cdut.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    中国石油股份公司科技专题“致密气勘探开发技术研究—致密气新区新领域资源潜力与富集规律研究——四川盆地新区新领域致密气成藏主控因素与有利目标优选”（编号：2021DJ2101）资助。

Reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors of Jurassic Shaximiao Formation in Wubaochang area，northeastern Sichuan Basin

ZHANG Xiaoli1, WANG Xiaojuan1, ZHANG Hang2, CHEN Qin3, GUAN Xu1, ZHAO Zhengwang1, WANG Changyong4, TAN Yaojie4   

  1. 1. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Southwest Oil and Gas Field Company, Chengdu 610041, China;
    2. Northeast Sichuan Gas District, PetroChina Southwest Oil and Gas Field Company, Dazhou 635000, Sichuan, China;
    3. Development Division, PetroChina Southwest Oil and Gas Field Company, Chengdu 610041, China;
    4. Institute of Sedimentary Geology, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
  • Received:2023-06-28 Revised:2023-10-25 Online:2024-09-01 Published:2024-09-04

PDF (PC)

153

摘要： 川东北地区侏罗系沙溪庙组致密砂岩具有较大的勘探潜力。利用铸体薄片、扫描电镜、阴极发光、X射线衍射、孔渗、压汞和包裹体均一温度等分析测试资料，对川东北五宝场地区侏罗系沙溪庙组储层特征进行了研究，并结合地震解释成果分析了储层致密化原因以及优质储层分布特征。研究结果表明：①川东北五宝场地区侏罗系沙溪庙组砂岩储层具有较高的长石和岩屑含量，分选和磨圆一般，结构成熟度和成分成熟度均较低，储层孔隙度大多小于6%，渗透率大多小于1 mD，孔渗相关性及孔隙结构均较差，主要发育裂缝-孔隙型储层。②研究区侏罗系沙溪庙组储层处于中成岩阶段A期，钙质胶结作用导致储层局部致密化，埋藏压实作用和浊沸石胶结是导致沙溪庙组砂岩致密化的主要原因，油气在储层致密化前后持续充注。③早期绿泥石环边胶结、大气水的淋滤以及构造破裂作用是研究区主要的建设性成岩作用，对原生粒间孔的保存、次生溶孔的形成和提高储层渗透性具有重要意义。④沉积微相、成岩作用和构造破裂作用共同控制了优质储层的分布，具早期绿泥石环边胶结、浊沸石弱胶结、长石溶蚀、裂缝发育的水下分流河道是相对优质砂岩储层的主要发育区。

关键词: 致密砂岩, 水下分流河道, 绿泥石环边胶结, 压实作用, 浊沸石胶结, 构造破裂作用, 沙溪庙组, 侏罗系, 五宝场地区, 四川盆地

Abstract: The tight sandstone of Jurassic Shaximiao Formation in northeastern Sichuan Basin has great exploration potential. The reservoir characteristics of Jurassic Shaximiao Formation in Wubaochang area of northeastern Sichuan Basin were studied by using analysis and testing data such as cast thin sections，scanning electron microscopy，cathodoluminescence，X-ray diffraction，properties，mercury injection and homogenization temperature of inclusions. Combined with seismic interpretation results，the reasons for reservoir densification and the distribution characteristics of high-quality reservoirs were analyzed. The results show that：（1）The sandstone reservoirs of Jurassic Shaximiao Formation in Wubaochang area of northeastern Sichuan Basin are characterized by high contents of feldspar and rock debris，general sorting and roundness，low structural maturity and compositional maturity，poor porosity and permeability correlation and poor pore structure，with reservoir porosity mostly less than 6%，permeability mostly less than 1 mD，and mainly developed fractured-porous reservoir.（2）The reservoirs of Jurassic Shaximiao Formation in the study area are in the middle diagenetic stage A. Calcareous cementation leads to local densification of the reservoirs，while burial compaction and laumontite cementation are the main causes for sandstone densification in Shaximiao Formation. Oil and gas continued to charge before and after reservoir densification.（3）Early chlorite rim cementation，atmospheric water leaching and tectonic rupture are the main constructive diagenesis，which are of great significance for the preservation of primary intergranular pores，the formation of secondary dissolved pores and the improvement of reservoir permeability.（4）Sedimentary microfacies，diagenesis and tectonic rupture control the distribution of high-quality reservoirs. The underwater distributary channel with early chlorite rim cementation，weak laumontite cementation，feldspar dissolution and fractures developed is the main development area of high-quality sandstone reservoirs.

Key words: tight sandstone, underwater distributary channels, chlorite rim cementation, compaction, laumontite cementation, tectonic rupture, Shaximiao Formation, Jurassic, Wubaochang area, Sichuan Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2
[1] 邹才能, 朱如凯, 白斌, 等. 致密油与页岩油内涵、特征、潜力及挑战[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2015, 34(1):3-17. ZOU Caineng, ZHU Rukai, BAI Bin, et al. Significance, geologic characteristics, resource potential and future challenges of tight oil and shale oil[J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 2015, 34(1):3-17.
[2] 韦腾强, 吴长江, 黄亚浩, 等. 流体包裹体拉曼定量技术在致密砂岩气藏研究中的应用:以四川盆地中部侏罗系沙溪庙组为例[J].天然气地球科学, 2021, 32(2):164-173. WEI Tengqiang, WU Changjiang, HUANG Yahao, et al. Application of fluid inclusion Raman quantitative technique to the study of tight sandstone gas reservoirs:Case study of Jurassic Shaximiao Formation in central Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2021, 32(2):164-173.
[3] 蔡益栋, 高国森, 刘大锰, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘临兴中区煤系气富集地质条件及成藏模式[J].天然气工业, 2022, 42(11):25-36. CAI Yidong, GAO Guosen, LIU Dameng, et al. Geological conditions for coal measure gas enrichment and accumulation models in Linxingzhong block along the eastern margin of the Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2022, 42(11):25-36.
[4] 郭彤楼, 熊亮, 叶素娟, 等. 输导层(体)非常规天然气勘探理论与实践:四川盆地新类型页岩气与致密砂岩气突破的启示[J].石油勘探与开发, 2023, 50(1):24-37. GUO Tonglou, XIONG Liang, YE Sujuan, et al. Theory and practice of unconventional gas exploration in carrier beds:Insight from the breakthrough of new type of shale gas and tight gas in Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2023, 50(1):24-37.
[5] 毛嘉宾, 严维理, 费怀义, 等. 川东北五宝场构造沙溪庙组储层特征[J].天然气工业, 2007, 27(5):8-10. MAO Jiabin, YAN Weili, FEI Huaiyi, et al. Reservoir characteristics of Shaximiao Formation in Wubaochang structure, northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2007, 27(5):8-10.
[6] 叶见玲, 李忠权, 张燕. 五宝场沙溪庙组裂缝成因分析[J].四川地质学报, 2011, 31(2):162-166. YE Jianling, LI Zhongquan, ZHANG Yan. On the genesis of fissures in the Shaximiao Formation, Wubaochang[J]. Acta Geologica Sichuan, 2011, 31(2):162-166.
[7] 陈敏. 五宝场构造沙溪庙组上段储层裂缝展布规律研究[D]. 成都:成都理工大学, 2010:18-60. CHEN Min. The study of distribution rule of reservoir fractures on the supper Shaximiao Formation in the Wubaochang gas field[D]. Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology, 2010:18-60.
[8] 杨恒, 曾汇川, 张洁伟, 等. 五宝场地区沙溪庙组致密砂岩储层地震预测技术[J].天然气勘探与开发, 2022, 45(增刊1):73-80. YANG Heng, ZENG Huichuan, ZHANG Jiewei, et al. Seismic prediction technologies used for tight sandstone reservoirs of Shaximiao Formation, Wubaochang area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural gas Exploration and Development, 2022, 45(Suppl 1):73-80.
[9] 赵子昂.川东北五宝场地区沙溪庙组二段储层特征及其主控因素[D].北京:中国石油大学(北京), 2022:36-59. ZHAO Ziang.Reservoir characteristics and its main control factors of J2s2 in the Wubaochang area of northeast Sichuan Basin[D]. Beijing:China University of Petroleum(Beijing), 2022:36-59.
[10] 徐明星, 任洪明, 胥伟冲, 等. 川东北地区沙溪庙组致密砂岩气井产能主控因素探讨[J].天然气勘探与开发, 2022, 45(4):103-110. XU Mingxing, REN Hongming, XU Weichong, et al. Main factors controlling productivity of tight sandstone gas wells in Shaximiao Formation, northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Exoloration and Development, 2022, 45(4):103-110.
[11] 王小娟, 陈双玲, 谢继容, 等. 川西南地区侏罗系沙溪庙组致密砂岩成藏特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1):78-87. WANG Xiaojuan, CHEN Shuangling, XIE Jirong, et al. Accumulation characteristics and main controlling factors of tight sandstone of Jurassic Shaximiao Formation in southwestern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(1):78-87.
[12] 王猛, 曾明, 陈鸿傲, 等. 储层致密化影响因素分析与有利成岩相带预测:以马岭油田长8油层组砂岩储层为例[J].岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(1):59-70. WANG Meng, ZENG Ming, CHEN Hong'ao, et al. Influencing factors of tight reservoirs and favorable diagenetic facies:A case study of Chang 8 reservoir of the Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation in Maling Oilfield, Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(1):59-70.
[13] 郭建林, 贾成业, 闫海军, 等. 致密砂岩气藏储渗单元研究方法与应用:以鄂尔多斯盆地二叠系下石盒子组为例[J].高校地质学报, 2018, 24(3):412-424. GUO Jianlin, JIA Chengye, YAN Haijun, et al. Research methodology and application of reservoir permeability units for tight sandstone gas reservoirs:A case study in the Permian Lower Shihezi Formation of the Ordos Basin[J]. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2018, 24(3):412-424.
[14] 施振生, 李熙喆, 董大忠, 等. 致密砂岩储层成岩作用与孔隙演化:以川西南上三叠统为例[J]. 地学前缘, 2018, 25(2):179-190. SHI Zhensheng, LI Xizhe, DONG Dazhong, et al. Diagenesis and pore evolution of tight sandstone reservoir:A case study from the Upper Triassic reservoir of the southwest Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2018, 25(2):179-190.
[15] 米伟伟, 谢小飞, 曹红霞, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南部二叠系山 2-盒8 段致密砂岩储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6):101-117. MI Weiwei, XIE Xiaofei, CAO Hongxia, et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors of tight sandstone reservoirs of Permian Shan 2 to He 8 members in southeastern Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(6):101-117.
[16] 黄彦庆, 肖开华, 金武军, 等. 川东北元坝西部须家河组致密砂岩裂缝发育特征及控制因素[J]. 地质科技通报, 2023, 42(2):105-114. HUANG Yanqing, XIAO Kaihua, JIN Wujun, et al. Characteristics and controlling factors of tight sandstone reservoir fractures in the Xujiahe Formation of the western Yuanba area, northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2023, 42(2):105-114.
[17] 汪泽成, 赵文智, 徐安娜, 等. 四川盆地北部大巴山山前带构造样式与变形机制[J].现代地质, 2006, 20(3):429-435. WANG Zecheng, ZHAO Wenzhi, XU Anna, et al. Structure styles and their deformation mechanisms of Dabashan foreland thrust belt in the north of Sichuan Basin[J]. Geoscience, 2006, 20(3):429-435.
[18] 郭正吾, 邓康龄, 韩永辉, 等. 四川盆地形成与演化[M]. 北京:地质出版社, 1996:130-240. GUO Zhengwu, DENG Kangling, HAN Yonghui, et al. The formation and development of Sichuan Basin[M]. Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 1996:130-240.
[19] 李建林, 王威, 罗爱军, 等. 川东五宝场地区沙溪庙组沉积相及储层物性[J].断块油气田, 2008, 15(3):23-26. LI Jianlin, WANG Wei, LUO Aijun, et al. Sedimentary facies and reservoir physical property of Shaximiao Formation in Wubaochang area, east Sichuan[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2008, 15(3):23-26.
[20] 郑荣才, 李国晖, 戴朝成, 等. 四川类前陆盆地盆-山耦合系统和沉积学响应[J].地质学报, 2012, 86(1):170-180. ZHENG Rongcai, LI Guohui, DAI Chaocheng, et al. Basinmountain coupling syestem and its sedimentary response in Sichuan analogous foreland Basin[J]. Acta Geologica sinica, 2012, 86(1):170-180.
[21] 肖富森, 马廷虎. 川东北五宝场构造沙溪庙组气藏勘探开发认识[J].天然气工业, 2007, 27(5):4-7. XIAO Fusen, MA Tinghu. Understanding of exploration and development of Shaximiao gas pool in Wubaochang structure, northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2007, 27(5):4-7.
[22] 卿元华, 吕正祥, 赵福, 等. 川中东北部中侏罗统沙一段致密砂岩中自生浊沸石形成机理[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2020, 39(3):536-547. QING Yuanhua, LYU Zhengxiang, ZHAO Fu, et al. Formation mechanism of authigenic laumonites in tight sandstone of member 1 of the Middle Jurassic Shaximiao Formation in the northeastern central Sichuan Basin[J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 2020, 39(3):536-547.
[23] 王小娟, 洪海涛, 吴长江, 等. 四川盆地川中地区侏罗系沙溪庙组致密砂岩储层特征及成因[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(4):1037-1051. WANG Xiaojuan, HONG Haitao, WU Changjiang, et al. Characteristics and formation mechanisms of tight sandstone reservoirs in Jurassic Shaximiao Formation, central of Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2022, 52(4):1037-1051.
[24] 陈少云, 杨勇强, 邱隆伟, 等. 川中地区侏罗系沙溪庙组储层特征及控制因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2022, 33(10):1597-1610. CHEN Shaoyun, YANG Yongqiang, QIU Longwei, et al. Reservoir characteristics and controlling factors of Jurassic Shaximiao Formation in central Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2022, 33(10):1597-1610.
[25] 王富明, 仲佳爱, 唐学渊, 等. 川东北宣汉黄金口一带中三叠统雷口坡组底界划分[J].地质通报, 2022, 41(2/3):509-515. WANG Fuming, ZHONG Jiaai, TANG Xueyuan, et al. Determination of the bottom boundary of the Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation in the Huangjinkou area of Xuanhan, northeast Sichuan[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2022, 41(2/3):509-515.
[26] 王昌勇, 王成玉, 梁晓伟, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区上三叠统延长组长8油层组成岩相[J].石油学报, 2011, 32(4):596-604. WANG Changyong, WANG Chengyu, LIANG Xiaowei, et al. Diagenetic facies of the Chang 8 oil-bearing layer of the Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation in the Jiyuan area, Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2011, 32(4):596-604.
[27] 王岚, 李文厚, 林潼, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地上三叠统延长组长6油层组储集层成岩作用及其影响因素[J].古地理学报, 2012, 14(3):311-320. WANG Lan, LI Wenhou, LIN Tong, et al. Diagenesis and its influencing factors of the Chang 6 interval of Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography (Chinese Edition), 2012, 14(3):311-320.
[28] 马永平, 王国栋, 张献文, 等. 粗粒沉积次生孔隙发育模式:以准噶尔盆地西北缘二叠系夏子街组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(5):34-43. MA Yongping, WANG Guodong, ZHANG Xianwen, et al. Development model of secondary pores in coarse-grained deposits:A case study of Permian Xiazijie Formation in northwestern margin of Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(5):34-43.
[29] 朱传庆, 邱楠生, 曹环宇, 等. 四川盆地东部构造-热演化:来自镜质体反射率和磷灰石裂变径迹的约束[J]. 地学前缘, 2017, 24(3):94-104. ZHU Chuanqing, QIU Nansheng, CAO Huanyu, et al. Tectonothermal evolution of the eastern Sichuan Basin:Constraints from the vitrinite reflectance and apatite fission track data[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2017, 24(3):94-104.
[30] 何龙, 郑荣才, 梁西文, 等. 川东涪陵地区大安寨段裂缝控制因素及期次分析[J].岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(4):88-96. HE Long, ZHENG Rongcai, LIANG Xiwen, et al. Controlling factors and development periods of fracture of Da'anzhai member in Fuling area, eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2014, 26(4):88-96.
[31] 石红才, 施小斌. 中、上扬子白垩纪以来的剥蚀过程及构造意义:低温年代学数据约束[J]. 地球物理学报, 2014, 57(8):2608-2619. SHI Hongcai, SHI Xiaobin. Exhumation process of Middle-Upper Yangtze since Cretaceous and its tectonic significance:Lowtemperature thermochronology constraints[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2014, 57(8):2608-2619.
[1] 余琪祥, 罗宇, 段铁军, 李勇, 宋在超, 韦庆亮. 准噶尔盆地环东道海子凹陷侏罗系煤层气成藏条件及勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 45-55.
[2] 张天择, 王红军, 张良杰, 张文起, 谢明贤, 雷明, 郭强, 张雪锐. 射线域弹性阻抗反演在阿姆河右岸碳酸盐岩气藏储层预测中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 56-65.
[3] 苟红光, 林潼, 房强, 张华, 李山, 程祎, 尤帆. 吐哈盆地胜北洼陷中下侏罗统水西沟群天文旋回地层划分[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 89-97.
[4] 张培军, 谢明贤, 罗敏, 张良杰, 陈仁金, 张文起, 乐幸福, 雷明. 巨厚膏盐岩形变机制解析及其对油气成藏的影响——以阿姆河右岸东部阿盖雷地区侏罗系为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 36-44.
[5] 乔桐, 刘成林, 杨海波, 王义凤, 李剑, 田继先, 韩杨, 张景坤. 准噶尔盆地盆1井西凹陷侏罗系三工河组凝析气藏特征及成因机制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 169-180.
[6] 闫雪莹, 桑琴, 蒋裕强, 方锐, 周亚东, 刘雪, 李顺, 袁永亮. 四川盆地公山庙西地区侏罗系大安寨段致密油储层特征及高产主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 98-109.
[7] 李道清, 陈永波, 杨东, 李啸, 苏航, 周俊峰, 仇庭聪, 石小茜. 准噶尔盆地白家海凸起侏罗系西山窑组煤岩气“甜点”储层智能综合预测技术[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 23-35.
[8] 陈康, 戴隽成, 魏玮, 刘伟方, 闫媛媛, 郗诚, 吕龑, 杨广广. 致密砂岩AVO属性的贝叶斯岩相划分方法——以川中地区侏罗系沙溪庙组沙一段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 111-121.
[9] 杨学锋, 赵圣贤, 刘勇, 刘绍军, 夏自强, 徐飞, 范存辉, 李雨桐. 四川盆地宁西地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气富集主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 99-110.
[10] 孔令峰, 徐加放, 刘丁. 三塘湖盆地侏罗系西山窑组褐煤储层孔隙结构特征及脱水演化规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 15-24.
[11] 周刚, 杨岱林, 孙奕婷, 严威, 张亚, 文华国, 和源, 刘四兵. 四川盆地及周缘寒武系沧浪铺组沉积充填过程及油气地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 25-34.
[12] 周洪锋, 吴海红, 杨禹希, 向红英, 高吉宏, 贺昊文, 赵旭. 二连盆地巴音都兰凹陷B51井区白垩系阿四段扇三角洲前缘沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 85-97.
[13] 计玉冰, 郭冰如, 梅珏, 尹志军, 邹辰. 四川盆地南缘昭通示范区罗布向斜志留系龙马溪组页岩储层裂缝建模[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 137-145.
[14] 邵威, 周道容, 李建青, 章诚诚, 刘桃. 下扬子逆冲推覆构造后缘凹陷油气富集关键要素及有利勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 61-71.
[15] 白雪峰, 李军辉, 张大智, 王有智, 卢双舫, 隋立伟, 王继平, 董忠良. 四川盆地仪陇—平昌地区侏罗系凉高山组页岩油地质特征及富集条件[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 52-64.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 庞雄奇, 陈冬霞, 张　俊. 隐蔽油气藏的概念与分类及其在实际应用中需要注意的问题[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 1 -8 .
[2] 魏钦廉, 郑荣才, 肖玲, 王成玉, 牛小兵. 鄂尔多斯盆地吴旗地区长6 储层特征及影响因素分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 45 -50 .
[3] 杨秋莲, 李爱琴, 孙燕妮, 崔攀峰. 超低渗储层分类方法探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 51 -56 .
[4] 张杰, 赵玉华. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组地震层序地层研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 71 -74 .
[5] 雷卞军，张吉，王彩丽，王晓蓉，李世临，刘斌. 高分辨率层序地层对微相和储层的控制作者用——以靖边气田统5井区马五段上部为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 1 -7 .
[6] 杨杰，卫平生，李相博. 石油地震地质学的基本概念、内容和研究方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 1 -6 .
[7] 杨占龙, 张正刚, 陈启林, 郭精义,沙雪梅, 刘文粟. 利用地震信息评价陆相盆地岩性圈闭的关键点分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 57 -63 .
[8] 旷红伟，高振中，王正允，王晓光. 一种独特的隐蔽油藏——夏9井区成岩圈闭油藏成因分析及其对勘探的启迪[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 8 -14 .
[9] 李国军, 郑荣才,唐玉林,汪洋,唐楷. 川东北地区飞仙关组层序- 岩相古地理特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 64 -70 .
[10] 代黎明, 李建平, 周心怀, 崔忠国, 程建春. 渤海海域新近系浅水三角洲沉积体系分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 75 -81 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发