岩性油气藏 ›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2): 50–57.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20180206

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

车镇凹陷沙二段滩坝砂体沉积特征及控制因素

时瑞坤1, 高秋菊1, 韩小锋2, 巴素玉1, 师涛1, 韩敏3   

  1. 1. 中国石化胜利油田分公司 物探研究院, 山东 东营 257022;
    2. 中国地质调查局西安地质调查中心, 西安 710054;
    3. 中国石化胜利油田分公司 勘探开发研究院, 山东 东营 257000
  • 收稿日期:2017-11-03 修回日期:2018-01-15 出版日期:2018-03-21 发布日期:2018-03-21
  • 第一作者:时瑞坤(1985-),男,硕士,工程师,主要从事油气勘探综合研究工作。地址:(257022)山东省东营市东营区北一路210号物探研究院。Email:280590708@qq.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重大科技专项“大型油气田及煤层气开发”子课题“致密油藏储层地震预测方法及地应力研究”(编号:2017ZX05072001)、国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目“陆相页岩油富集要素与有利区预测”(编号:2014CB239104)和中国石化油气勘探开发领域重大项目“济阳坳陷油气聚集规律及精细评价关键技术”子课题“复杂隐蔽油气藏地震勘探关键技术研究”(编号:ZDP17008)联合资助

Sedimentary characteristics and controlling factors of beach-bar sandbodies of the second member of Shahejie Formation in Chezhen Sag

SHI Ruikun1, GAO Qiuju1, HAN Xiaofeng2, BA Suyu1, SHI Tao1, HAN Min3   

  1. 1. Geophysical Research Institute, Shengli Oilfield Company, Sinopec, Dongying 257022, Shandong, China;
    2. Xi'an center of Geological Survey, CGS, Xi'an 710054, China;
    3. Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Shengli Oilfield Company, Sinopec, Dongying 257000, Shandong, China
  • Received:2017-11-03 Revised:2018-01-15 Online:2018-03-21 Published:2018-03-21

摘要: 车镇凹陷沙二段沉积时期发育了一定规模的滩坝砂体,对于其沉积迁移规律等的认识不够深入,制约了滩坝砂油藏的精细勘探开发进程。为了进一步明确研究区滩坝砂体的沉积迁移规律,在充分利用岩心、录井、测井及相关测试资料的基础上,系统研究了滩坝砂体的沉积特征及控制因素。结果表明:车镇凹陷沙二段滩坝砂体以岩屑长石砂岩为主,粒度概率曲线以反映波浪作用的跳跃加悬浮式和两段跳跃加悬浮式为主;滩坝砂体沉积构造类型多样,主要发育反映波浪作用的浪成沙纹交错层理和沙纹交错层理、反映强水动力作用的平行层理,以及反映生物作用的生物钻孔和生物扰动构造;滩坝砂体主要为原地改造型,垂向上主要发育反粒序特征明显的坝砂和相序不明显的滩砂,局部地区发育由于波浪作用改造不彻底而形成的正粒序或复合相序;断层活动控制了滩坝砂体的沉积迁移规律,波浪作用控制了原地改造型滩坝的发育,物源供给控制了滩坝砂体的发育规模;整体上,车镇凹陷沙二段滩坝砂体具有“漫湖”沉积特征,成分成熟度和结构成熟度均中等偏低。研究结果可为车镇凹陷沙二段滩坝砂油藏的进一步勘探开发提供参考。

Abstract: A certain scale of beach-bar sandbodies were developed during the sedimentary stage of the second member of Shahejie Formation in Chezhen Sag. The understanding of the law of sedimentation and migration of beach-bar sandbodies is not yet deep enough, which restricts the process of fine exploration and development of beach-bar sandbody reservoirs. In order to further clarify the law of sedimentation and migration of beach-bar sandbodies, the sedimentary characteristics and controlling factors of the beach-bar sandbodies were studied by integrating the data of core, drilling, logging and relevant test data. The results show that the beach-bar sandbodies were dominated by debris-feldspar sandstones, the grain size probability curves mainly include patterns of "1 skip + 1 suspension" and "2 skip + 1 suspension" representing wave deposition. Several types of sedimentary structures were developed in beach-bar sandbodies, mainly including wave-ripple cross-bedding and ripple crossbedding with wave influence, horizontal bedding reflecting strong hydrodynamic force, burrow pores and bioturbation structures indicating biological effect. The beach-bar sandbodies were reconstructed in-situ, which mainly developed bar facies with obvious inverted sequence, beach facies with indistinct inverted sequence and beachbar facies with positive sequence and composite sequence vertically due to the role of wave transforming incompletely in partial area. The fault activities controlled the deposits and migrations of the beach-bar sandbodies, wave actions controlled the development of the in-situ reconstructed beach-bar sandbodies, and the supplies of material sources controled the development scales of the beach bar sandbodies. The beach-bar sandbodies were entirely distributed in overall basin with characteristics of over-lake deposition with meidium-low compositional and structural maturity during the sedimentation of the second member of Shahejie Formation in Chezhen Sag. The results can provide a reference for the further exploration and development of beach-bar sandbody reservoirs of the second member of Shahejie Formation in Chezhen Sag.

中图分类号: 

  • TE121.3
[1] CLIFTON H E. Supply, segregation, successions, and significance of shallow marine conglomeratic deposits. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, 2003, 51(4):370-388.
[2] WRIGHT L D, SHORT A D. Morpho dynamic variability of surf zones and beaches:asynthesis. Marine Geology, 1984, 56(1):93-118.
[3] 王永诗, 刘惠民, 高永进, 等. 断陷湖盆滩坝砂体成因与成藏:以东营凹陷沙四上亚段为例. 地学前缘, 2012, 19(1):100-107. WANG Y S, LIU H M, GAO Y J, et al. Sandbody genesis and hydrocarbon accumulation mechanism of beach-bar reservoir in faulted-lacustrine-basins:a case study from the upper of the fourth member of Shahejie Formation,Dongying Sag. Earth Science Frontiers, 2012, 19(1):100-107.
[4] 陈世悦, 杨剑萍, 操应长.惠民凹陷西部下第三系沙河街组两种滩坝沉积特征.煤田地质与勘探, 2000, 28(3):1-4. CHEN S Y, YANG J P, CAO Y C. Sedimentary characteristics of two kinds of beach bars of Shahejie Formation in the western Huimin Depression. China Coal Geology & Exploration, 2000, 28(3):1-4.
[5] 杨勇强, 邱隆伟, 姜在兴, 等. 陆相断陷湖盆滩坝沉积模式——以东营凹陷古近系沙四上亚段为例. 石油学报, 2011, 32(3):417-423. YANG Y Q, QIU L W, JIANG Z X, et a1. A depositional pattern of beach bar in continental rift lake basins:a case study on the upper part of the fourth member of the Shahejie Formation in the Dong-ying Sag. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2011, 32(3):417-423.
[6] 杨剑萍, 张一平, 王爱香, 等.霸县凹陷高家堡地区沙三上亚段滩坝沉积特征.特种油气藏, 2017, 24(1):1-5. YANG J P, ZHANG Y P, WANG A X, et a1.Characteristics of beach bar sedimentation in Sha-3 upper sub-interval of Gaojiapu area in the Baxian Sag. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2017, 24(1):1-5.
[7] 操应长, 王健, 刘惠民, 等.东营凹陷南坡沙四上亚段滩坝砂体的沉积特征及模式. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 33(6):5-10. CAO Y C, WANG J, LIU H M, et a1. Sedimentary characteristics and models of beach-bar sandbody in the upper part of the fourth member of Paleogene in the south slope of Dongying Depression. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science), 2009, 33(6):5-10.
[8] 朱筱敏, 信荃麟, 张晋仁.断陷湖盆滩坝储集体沉积特征及沉积模式.沉积学报, 1994, 12(2):20-28. ZHU X M, XIN Q L, ZHANG J R. Sedimentary characteristics and models of the beach bar reservoirs in faulted down lacustrine basin. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1994, 12(2):20-28.
[9] 张宇. 东营凹陷西部沙四段上亚段滩坝砂体的沉积特征.油气地质与采收率, 2008, 15(6):35-38. ZHANG Y. Sedimentary characteristics of beach-bar sandbodies in Es4 member in the western Dongying Depression. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2008, 15(6):35-38.
[10] 张闻亭, 潘树新, 刘震华, 等.地震沉积学在坳陷湖盆滩坝砂体预测中的应用——以酒西盆地Y区块间泉子段为例.岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(6):109-116. ZHANG W T, PAN S X, LIU Z H, et a1. Application of seismic sedimentology to prediction of beach and bar sand bodies in lacustrine basin:a case study of Jianquanzi member in Y block, Jiuxi Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(6):109-116.
[11] 邓宏文, 高晓鹏, 赵宁, 等.济阳坳陷北部断陷湖盆陆源碎屑滩坝成因类型、分布规律与成藏特征.古地理学报, 2010, 12(6):737-747. DENG H W, GAO X P, ZHAO N, et a1.Genetic types, distribution patterns and hydrocarbon accumulation in terrigenous beach and bar in northern faulted-lacustrine-basin of Jiyang Depression. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2010, 12(6):737-747.
[12] 赵贤正, 王权, 淡伟宁, 等.二连盆地白垩系地层岩性油藏的勘探发现及前景.岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(2):1-9. ZHAO X Z, WANG Q, DAN W N, et a1. Exploration discovery and prospects of Cretaceous stratigraphic-lithologic reservoirs in Erlian Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(2):1-9.
[13] 崔周旗, 李莉, 王宏霞, 等.霸县凹陷古近系深层砂岩储层特征与岩性油气藏勘探.岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(2):51-58. CUI Z Q, LI L, WANG H X, et a1.Characteristics of deep sandstone reservoirs and lithologic reservoir exploration of Paleogene in Baxian Sag. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(2):51-58.
[14] 吴冬, 朱筱敏, 刘常妮, 等. Fula凹陷中央转换带对岩性油藏勘探的意义——以Abu Gabra组为例.岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(4):64-72. WU D, ZHU X M, LIU C N, et a1. Significance of central transfer zone on lithologic reservoir exploration:a case of Abu Gabra Formation in Fula Sag, Muglad Basin, Sudan. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(4):64-72.
[15] 陈启林. 大型咸化湖盆地层岩性油气藏有利条件与勘探方向——以柴达木盆地柴西南古近纪为例.岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1):46-51. CHEN Q L. Favorable condition and exploration prospecting of lithologic hydrocarbon reservoir in large-scale saline basin-Case study on the Eogene in the southwest of Qaidam Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(1):46-51.
[16] 赵卫卫, 査明.陆相断陷盆地岩性油气藏成藏过程物理模拟及机理初探.岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(6):37-43. ZHAO W W, ZHA M. Physical simulation on hydrocarbon accumulation of lithologic reservoirs and its mechanism in continental rifted basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2011, 23(6):37-43.
[17] 周廷全, 鲜本忠, 林会喜, 等.车镇凹陷陡坡带古近系湖底扇沉积规律及储层特征.油气地质与采收率, 2007, 14(2):23-27. ZHOU T Q, XIAN B Z, LIN H X, et al. Sedimentary rules and reservoir characteristics of sublacustrine fan in Paleogene in steep slope of Chenzhen Sag. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2007, 14(2):23-27.
[18] 路慎强, 王健, 操应长, 等.车西洼陷沙二段滩坝砂体粒度特征及其水动力学意义.油气地质与采收率, 2013, 20(3):26-29. LU S Q, WANG J, CAO Y C, et al. Study on characteristics and hydro-dynamic significance of grain size components of beachbar sand-bodies, second member of Shahejie Formation, Chexi Sag. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2013, 20(3):26-29.
[19] 邱桂强, 王勇, 熊伟, 等.济阳坳陷新生代盆地结构差异性研究.油气地质与采收率, 2011, 18(6):1-5. QIU G Q, WANG Y, XIONG W, et al. Study on structural differences of Cenozoic basin, Jiyang Depression. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2011, 18(6):1-5.
[20] 操应长, 韩敏, 王艳忠, 等.济阳坳陷车镇凹陷沙二段浅水三角洲沉积特征及模式.石油与天然气地质, 2010, 31(5):576-582. CAO Y C, HAN M, WANG Y Z, et a1.Sedimentary characteristics and models of shallow-water delta deposits in the second member of the Shahejie Formation in the Chezhen Sag, the Jiyang Depression.Oil & Gas Geology, 2010, 31(5):576-582.
[21] 操应长, 王健, 刘惠民. 利用环境敏感粒度组分分析滩坝砂体水动力学机制的初步探讨——以东营凹陷西部沙四上滩坝砂体沉积为例. 沉积学报, 2010, 28(2):274-284. CAO Y C, WANG J, LIU H M. Preliminary study on the hydrodynamic mechanism of beach-bar sandbodies with environmentally sensitive grain size components:a case study from beachbar sandbody sediments of the upper part of the fourth member of the Shahejie Formation in the western Dongying Depression. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2010, 28(2):274-284.
[22] 王蛟, 陈世悦, 姜在兴, 等. 胜利油田车镇凹陷沙河街组二、三段沉积相.沉积与特提斯地质, 2005, 25(3):80-86. WANG J, CHEN S Y, JIANG Z X, et a1. Sedimentary facies in the second and third members of the Shahejie Formation in the Che-zhen Depression. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 2005, 25(3):80-86.
[1] 苟红光, 林潼, 房强, 张华, 李山, 程祎, 尤帆. 吐哈盆地胜北洼陷中下侏罗统水西沟群天文旋回地层划分[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 89-97.
[2] 尹虎, 屈红军, 孙晓晗, 杨博, 张磊岗, 朱荣幸. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南部三叠系长7油层组深水沉积特征及演化规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 145-155.
[3] 周刚, 杨岱林, 孙奕婷, 严威, 张亚, 文华国, 和源, 刘四兵. 四川盆地及周缘寒武系沧浪铺组沉积充填过程及油气地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 25-34.
[4] 易珍丽, 石放, 尹太举, 李斌, 李猛, 刘柳, 王铸坤, 余烨. 塔里木盆地哈拉哈塘—哈得地区中生界物源转换及沉积充填响应[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 56-66.
[5] 孟庆昊, 张昌民, 张祥辉, 朱锐, 向建波. 塔里木盆地现代分支河流体系形态、分布及其主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 44-56.
[6] 周洪锋, 吴海红, 杨禹希, 向红英, 高吉宏, 贺昊文, 赵旭. 二连盆地巴音都兰凹陷B51井区白垩系阿四段扇三角洲前缘沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 85-97.
[7] 包汉勇, 赵帅, 张莉, 刘皓天. 川东红星地区中上二叠统页岩气勘探成果及方向展望[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 12-24.
[8] 邹连松, 徐文礼, 梁西文, 刘皓天, 周坤, 霍飞, 周林, 文华国. 川东地区下侏罗统自流井组东岳庙段泥页岩沉积特征及物质来源[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 122-135.
[9] 方旭庆, 钟骑, 张建国, 李军亮, 孟涛, 姜在兴, 赵海波. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷古近系沙三下亚段旋回地层学分析及地层划分[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 19-30.
[10] 冯斌, 黄晓波, 何幼斌, 李华, 罗进雄, 李涛, 周晓光. 渤海湾盆地庙西北地区古近系沙河街组三段源-汇系统重建[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 84-95.
[11] 王宏波, 张雷, 曹茜, 张建伍, 潘星. 鄂尔多斯盆地二叠系盒8段河流扇沉积模式及勘探意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 117-126.
[12] 薄尚尚, 田继先, 李曜良, 王晔桐, 王昊, 孙国强. 川东北地区上三叠统须家河组物源分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 99-112.
[13] 邓远, 陈轩, 覃建华, 李映艳, 何吉祥, 陶鑫, 尹太举, 高阳. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组一段沉积期古地貌特征及有利储层分布[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 136-144.
[14] 刘计国, 周鸿璞, 秦雁群, 邹荃, 郑凤云, 李早红, 肖高杰. 非洲Muglad盆地Fula凹陷白垩系AG组岩性油气藏勘探潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 82-91.
[15] 孙辉, 范国章, 王红平, 丁梁波, 左国平, 马宏霞, 庞旭, 许小勇. 东非鲁伍马盆地中始新统深水沉积特征及层序界面识别方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 106-116.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨占龙, 张正刚, 陈启林, 郭精义,沙雪梅, 刘文粟. 利用地震信息评价陆相盆地岩性圈闭的关键点分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 57 -63 .
[2] 方朝合, 王义凤, 郑德温, 葛稚新. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系烃源岩显微组分分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 87 -90 .
[3] 林承焰, 谭丽娟, 于翠玲. 论油气分布的不均一性(Ⅰ)———非均质控油理论的由来[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 16 -21 .
[4] 王天琦, 王建功, 梁苏娟, 沙雪梅. 松辽盆地徐家围子地区葡萄花油层精细勘探[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 22 -27 .
[5] 王西文,石兰亭,雍学善,杨午阳. 地震波阻抗反演方法研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 80 -88 .
[6] 何宗斌,倪 静,伍 东,李 勇,刘丽琼,台怀忠. 根据双TE 测井确定含烃饱和度[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 89 -92 .
[7] 袁胜学,王 江. 吐哈盆地鄯勒地区浅层气层识别方法研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 111 -113 .
[8] 陈斐,魏登峰,余小雷,吴少波. 鄂尔多斯盆地盐定地区三叠系延长组长2 油层组沉积相研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 43 -47 .
[9] 徐云霞,王山山,杨帅. 利用沃尔什变换提高地震资料信噪比[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(3): 98 -100 .
[10] 李建明,史玲玲,汪立群,吴光大. 柴西南地区昆北断阶带基岩油藏储层特征分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(2): 20 -23 .