薄互层火成岩地震响应特征及厚度预测

doi:10.12108/yxyqc.20190312

岩性油气藏 ›› 2019, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3): 105–112.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20190312

薄互层火成岩地震响应特征及厚度预测

刘恭利, 韩自军, 段新意, 甄宗玉

中海石油(中国)有限公司天津分公司, 天津 300459

收稿日期:2018-11-06 修回日期:2019-01-28 出版日期:2019-05-21 发布日期:2019-05-06
作者简介:刘恭利(1986-),男,硕士,工程师,主要从事地球物理的构造解释和储层预测方面的研究工作。地址:(300459)天津市滨海新区海川路2121号渤海石油研究院。Email:liugl28@cnooc.com.cn。
基金资助:
国家重大科技专项“渤海海域勘探新领域及关键技术研究”（编号：2016ZX05024-003）资助

Seismic response characteristics and thickness prediction of thin interbedded igneous rocks

LIU Gongli, HAN Zijun, DUAN Xinyi, ZHEN Zongyu

Tianjin Branch, CNOOC, Tianjin 300459, China

Received:2018-11-06 Revised:2019-01-28 Online:2019-05-21 Published:2019-05-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 渤海地区B油田在古近系目的层段内广泛发育多种岩相的火成岩，这种喷发型为主的火成岩多以薄互层形式存在，但其厚度具有不均匀性，横向变化较大，准确描述火成岩厚度分布对后续井位部署和储量评价均具有至关重要的作用。对油田范围内已钻井火成岩厚度及组合规律进行分析，认为对油田勘探开发影响较大的是薄互层形式的溢流相火成岩，系统研究薄互层形式下的组合结构、毛厚度、及净毛比3种因素对火成岩地震响应特征的影响，并通过实际数据建立了不同的分析模型，认为净毛比是振幅响应的主控因素，利用实际子波正演建立净毛比和响应振幅的关系，并采用约束稀疏脉冲反演方法对区域范围内的火成岩厚度进行预测，结果显示，预测厚度与实钻厚度吻合较好，有利于定量化研究火成岩对下伏构造的影响程度。该研究成果对后续勘探及储量评价具有较好的指导意义。

关键词: 薄互层, 火成岩, 地震响应, 厚度预测, 古近系, 渤海地区

Abstract: Igneous rocks are widely developed in Paleogene in B oilfield of Bohai Sea area. The igneous rocks dominated by eruption mainly exist in the form of thin interbeds, and their lateral thickness varies largely. It is very important to accurately describe the thickness distribution of igneous rocks for well location deployment and reserves evaluation. Based on the known thickness distribution and combination law of igneous rocks in drilled wells, it is considered that overflow igneous rocks in the form of thin interbeds have a great influence on oil field exploration and development. The influencing factors such as combination, total thickness and igneous rock ratio were systematically studied, which lead to different seismic response characteristics of thin interbedded igneous rocks. Based on real data, different analysis models were established to demonstrate the influences of the three factors. It is considered that igneous rock ratio is the main controlling factor affecting the amplitude of seismic response. Relationship between igneous rock ratios and amplitude was established by using actual wavelet forward modeling, and the thickness of thin-interbed igneous rocks was predicted using constrained sparse pulse inversion. The result shows that the predicted thickness is in good agreement with actual drilling thickness, so this method is helpful to quantitatively study the influence of igneous rocks on underlying structures. The research results have good guiding significance for further exploration and reserves evaluation.

Key words: thin interbed, igneous rock, seismic response, thickness prediction, Paleogene, Bohai Sea area

中图分类号:

P631.4

刘恭利, 韩自军, 段新意, 甄宗玉. 薄互层火成岩地震响应特征及厚度预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(3): 105–112.

LIU Gongli, HAN Zijun, DUAN Xinyi, ZHEN Zongyu. Seismic response characteristics and thickness prediction of thin interbedded igneous rocks[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(3): 105–112.

参考文献

[1] 崔泽宏, 汤良杰. 塔河地区火山岩地震相及勘探潜力. 新疆石油地质, 2010, 31(3):252-254. CUI Z H, TANG L J. Seismic facies and exploration potential of volcanic rocks in the Tahe area. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2010, 31(3):252-254.
[2] 邹才能, 赵文智, 贾承造, 等. 中国沉积盆地火山岩油气藏形成与分布. 石油勘探与开发, 2008, 35(3):257-271. ZOU C N, ZHAO W Z, JIA C Z, et al. Formation and distribution of volcanic reservoirs in China's sedimentary basins. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2008, 35(3):257-271.
[3] 郭涛, 杨波, 陈磊, 等. 岩浆岩三维精细刻画:黄河口凹陷南斜坡渤中34-9油田的发现. 中国海上油气, 2016, 28(2):71-77. GUO T, YANG B, CHEN L, et al. 3D fine description of magmatic rocks:The discovery of BZ 34-9 oilfield in the southern slope of Huanghekou Sag. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2016, 28(2):71-77.
[4] 吴庆勋, 王粤川, 韦阿娟, 等. 渤海海域中生代火山岩喷发旋回划分及与油气的关系.中国海上油气, 2017, 29(2):18-26. WU Q X, WANG Y C, WEI A J, et al. Division of Mesozoic volcanic rock eruption cycle and its relationship with oil and gas in the Bohai sea. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2017, 29(2):18-26.
[5] 武强, 王应斌, 张中巧, 等. 歧中北-沙西火成岩形成机制及油气地质意义. 断块油气田, 2012, 19(4):467-471. WU Q, WANG Y B, ZHANG Z Q, et al. Formation mechanism of igneous rock and its geological significance in QizhongbeiShaxi area. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2012, 19(4):467-471.
[6] 田晓平, 陈国成, 杨庆红, 等.渤海海域古近系碎屑岩储层展布定量研究. 中国海上油气, 2016, 28(2):71-77. TIAN X P, CHEN G C, YANG Q H, et al. A quantitative study on distribution of Paleogene clastic reservoir in Bohai water. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2016, 28(2):71-77.
[7] 简晓玲, 刘金萍, 王改云, 等.北黄海盆地东部坳陷火成岩地震相识别与分布预测.海洋地质前沿, 2014, 30(11):314-319. JIAN X L, LIU J P, WANG G Y, et al. The Meso-Cenozoic structural styles of the eastern depression in the North Yellow Sea Basin. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2014, 30(11):314-319.
[8] 张玉芬. 影响薄互层地震反射波特征因素分析. 地质科技情报, 1998, 17(3):101-106. ZHANG Y F. Factors analysis affecting seismic reflection characteristics of thin interbedding. Geological Science and Technology Information, 1998, 17(3):101-106.
[9] 孙淑艳, 李艳菊, 彭莉, 等.火成岩地震识别及构造描述方法研究. 特种油气藏, 2003, 10(1):47-54. SUN S Y, LI Y J, PENG L, et al. Study on seismic identification and structure description of igneous rock. Special Oil and Gas Reservoir, 2003, 10(1):47-54.
[10] 黄玉龙, 单俊峰, 边伟华, 等. 辽河坳陷中基性火成岩相分类及储集意义. 石油勘探与开发, 2014, 41(6):671-680. HUANG Y L, SHAN J F, BIAN W H, et al. Classification and reservoir significance of medium-based igneous facies in Liaohe depression. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(6):671-680.
[11] CAS R A F, WRIGHT J V. Volcanic successions modern and ancient. London:Allen & Unwin, 1987:59-333.
[12] 金伯禄, 张希友. 长白山火山地质研究. 长春:东北朝鲜民族教育出版社, 1994:40-49. JIN B L, ZHANG X Y. Study on volcanic geology of Changbai Mountain. Changchun:Northeast Korean National Education Press, 1994:40-49.
[13] 谢家莹, 陶奎元. 中国东南大陆中生代火山地质及火山-侵入杂岩. 北京:地质出版社, 1996:40-71. XIE J Y, TAO K Y. Mesozoic volcanic geology and volcanoes of southeastern China. Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 1996:40-71.
[14] 王璞珺, 迟元林, 刘万洙, 等.松辽盆地火山岩相类型、特征和储层意义. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2003, 33(4):449-456. WANG P J, CHI Y L, LIU W Z, et al. Volcanic facies of the Songliao Basin:Classification, characteristics and reservoir significance. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2003, 33(4):449-456.
[15] 孔垂显, 邱子刚, 卢志远, 等. 准噶尔盆地东部石炭系火山岩岩体划分. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(6):15-22. KONG C X, QIU Z G, LU Z Y, et al. Division of Carboniferous volcanic rock mass in eastern Junggar Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(6):15-22.
[16] 何贤英, 刘勇, 许学龙, 等. 西泉地区石炭系火山岩储层主控因素及有利储层预测. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(3):42-51. HE X Y, LIU Y, XU X L, et al. Controlling factors of Carboniferous volcanic reservoirs and favorable reservoir prediction in Xiquan area, Junggar Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(3):42-51.
[17] 林承焰, 梁昌国, 任丽华, 等.碎屑岩潜山沉积相及其与裂缝发育的关系.中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 32(4):1-6. LIN C Y, LIANG C G, REN L H, et al. Sedimentary facies and relation to degree of fracture development of clastic buried hills. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science), 2008, 32(4):1-6.
[18] 白晓寅, 韩长春, 贺永红, 等.银额盆地哈日凹陷火成岩发育特征及其成藏作用. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(6):18-26. BAI X Y, HAN C C, HE Y H, et al. Development characteristics of igneous rocks and its role in hydrocarbon accumulation in Hari Sag, Yingen-Ejinaqi Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(6):18-26.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

薄互层火成岩地震响应特征及厚度预测

Seismic response characteristics and thickness prediction of thin interbedded igneous rocks

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	张汶, 吕世聪, 赵大林, 贾海松, 蔡越钎. 渤海湾盆地西南部古近系滩坝沉积特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 85-94.
[2]	黄华, 袁娟梅, 彭伟, 张亮, 文辉. 江汉盆地古近系潜江组盐湖沉积特征与成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 9-16.
[3]	向巧维, 李小平, 丁琳, 杜家元. 珠江口盆地珠一坳陷古近系高自然伽马砂岩形成机制及油气地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 93-103.
[4]	庞小军, 王清斌, 解婷, 赵梦, 冯冲. 黄河口凹陷北缘古近系物源及其对优质储层的控制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 1-13.
[5]	周华建. 基于叠前OVT域偏移的河道砂体预测方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(4): 112-120.
[6]	张云银, 魏欣伟, 谭明友, 高秋菊, 朱定蓉, 林述喜. 基于压缩感知技术的去除强屏蔽研究及应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(4): 85-91.
[7]	白晓寅, 韩长春, 贺永红, 任来义, 马芳侠, 陈治军, 刘护创. 银额盆地哈日凹陷火成岩发育特征及其成藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(6): 18-26.
[8]	杨兆平, 岳世俊, 郑长龙, 刘雄志, 陈更新. 薄互层砂岩油藏多因素综合约束的产量劈分方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(6): 117-124.
[9]	左国平, 范国章, 吕福亮, 邵大力. 孟加拉湾浅层气成藏条件及地震识别技术[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(2): 110-119.
[10]	刘化清, 苏明军, 倪长宽, 洪忠, 崔向丽, 胡凯峰, 李政阳, 毛俊丽. 薄砂体预测的地震沉积学研究方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(2): 1-11.
[11]	杨占龙, 肖冬生, 周隶华, 黄云峰, 黄小鹏, 沙雪梅. 高分辨率层序格架下的陆相湖盆精细沉积体系研究——以吐哈盆地西缘侏罗系—古近系为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(5): 1-10.
[12]	金凤鸣, 崔周旗, 王权, 李莉, 任春玲, 崔明洋, 肖伟. 冀中坳陷地层岩性油气藏分布特征与主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(2): 19-27.
[13]	崔周旗, 李莉, 王宏霞, 王元杰, 郭柳汐, 侯凤梅. 霸县凹陷古近系深层砂岩储层特征与岩性油气藏勘探[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(2): 51-58.
[14]	韩光明，潘光超，付琛，罗琪，邵远，汪锐. 含气储层及盖层速度变化对地震响应和AVO 类型的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(2): 107-113.
[15]	黄苓渝，张昌民，刘江艳，向小玲，徐发，侯国伟 . 东海西湖凹陷古近系砂岩侵入体及其地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(5): 74-80.