岩性油气藏 ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 29–39.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20230303

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

柴达木盆地西北部南翼山地区古近系下干柴沟组上段储层特征及主控因素

张振华1, 张小军2,3, 钟大康1, 苟迎春2,3, 张世铭2,3   

  1. 1. 中国石油大学 (北京)地球科学学院, 北京 102249;
    2. 中国石油勘探开发研究院 西北分院, 兰州 730020;
    3. 中国石油天然气集团公司 油藏描述重点实验室, 兰州 730020
  • 收稿日期:2021-11-30 修回日期:2022-05-26 出版日期:2023-05-01 发布日期:2023-04-25
  • 第一作者:张振华(1996—),男,中国石油大学(北京)在读硕士研究生,研究方向为沉积学与储层地质学。地址:(102249)北京市昌平区府学路18号。Email:zh863457588@163.com。
  • 通信作者: 钟大康(1961-),男,博士,教授,主要从事沉积学与储层地质学方面的科研与教学工作。Email:zhongdakang@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    中国石油股份公司重大专项 “柴西地区石油勘探区带评价及目标优选”(编号: 2016E-01-03) 资助。

Reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors of upper member of Paleogene Xiaganchaigou Formation in Nanyishan area, northwestern Qaidam Basin

ZHANG Zhenhua1, ZHANG Xiaojun2,3, ZHONG Dakang1, GOU Yingchun2,3, ZHANG Shiming2,3   

  1. 1. College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China;
    2. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development-Northwest, Lanzhou 730020, China;
    3. Key Laboratory of Reservoir Description, CNPC, Lanzhou 730020, China
  • Received:2021-11-30 Revised:2022-05-26 Online:2023-05-01 Published:2023-04-25

摘要: 通过岩心观察、薄片鉴定和电子探针分析等多种实验手段,对柴达木盆地西北部南翼山地区古近系下干柴沟组上段储层特征及其主控因素进行了研究。研究结果表明:①南翼山地区下干柴沟组上段储层具有混积特征,以碳酸盐岩为主,平均质量分数为42.6%,含陆源碎屑、硬石膏和黏土矿物,平均质量分数分别为24.9%,9.0%和12.8%;储层的主要岩性为灰云岩、白云岩和藻灰岩,平均体积分数分别为49.0%,12.0%和6.0%。②研究区储层为低孔、特低渗储层,孔隙度为1.0%~13.3%,平均为4.9%,92%的样品渗透率小于0.02 mD;孔隙类型以溶蚀孔、晶间孔为主,发育微裂缝,但常被胶结物充填,连通性较差;按孔喉半径可分为中等喉道、细-中和细-微喉道3类,平均孔喉半径分别为0.350 μm,0.110 μm和0.030 μm,占比分别为15%,40%和45%。③研究区主要为浅湖-半深湖亚相,可细分为灰云坪、藻席、砂坪及泥坪4种微相,储层的发育在宏观上受控于沉积微相,其中灰云坪储层占比最多,占储层总厚度的67%,藻席发育优质储层,藻灰岩厚度越大,储层的物性越好,而泥坪几乎不发育储层。④研究区储层在微观上受控于成岩作用和构造作用,准同生白云岩化作用、溶蚀作用及构造作用增加了储层的储集空间,改善了其渗透性,沉积后期的胶结作用对储层具有破坏性作用。

关键词: 混积岩, 灰云坪, 藻席, 浅湖—半深湖亚相, 准同生白云岩化作用, 下干柴沟组上段, 古近系, 南翼山地区, 柴达木盆地西北部

Abstract: By means of core observation,thin section identification and electron probe analysis,the reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors of the upper member of Paleogene Xiaganchaigou Formation(E32)in Nanyishan area of northwestern Qaidam Basin were studied. The results show that:(1)The reservoirs of E32 in Nanyishan area are characterized mixed sedimentation,dominated by carbonate rocks,with an average mass fraction of 42.6%,containing terrigenous clast,anhydrite and clay minerals,with the average mass fraction of 24.9%, 9.0% and 12.8%,respectively. The lithologies of the reservoirs are mainly limestone,dolomite and algal limestone,with an average volume fraction of 49.0%,12.0% and 6.0% respectively.(2)The reservoir porosity in the study ranges from 1.0% to 13.3%,with an average of 4.9%,and 92% of the samples have permeability less than 0.02 mD,indicating low porosity and ultra-low permeability. The pores are mainly dissolved pores and intercrystalline pores,and microfractures are developed,but they are often filled with cements,and the connectivity is poor. According to the pore throat radius,the throat can be divided into three types: medium throat,fine-medium throat and fine-micro throat,and the average pore throat radii are 0.350 μm,0.110 μm and 0.030 μm respectively,accounting for 15%,40% and 45% respectively.(3)The sedimentary subfacies in the study area is mainly shallow lacustrine to semi-deep lacustrine,which can be subdivided into four microfacies,namely,calcareous-dolomitic flat,algal mat,sand flat and mud flat. The development of reservoirs is closely related to sedimentary microfacies,of which the calcareous-dolomitic flat reservoir accounts for the largest proportion,accounting for 67% of the total thickness of the reservoir. High-quality reservoirs are developed in algal mat,and the thicker the algal limestone is,the better the physical properties of the reservoir are,while reservoir is hardly developed in mud flat.(4)The reservoirs in the study area are controlled by diagenesis and tectonism. Quasi-syngenetic dolomitization,dissolution and tectonism increased reservoir space and improved reservoir permeability,while cementation in the late sedimentary period has a destructive effect on the development of reservoir.

Key words: mixed sediments, calcareous-dolomitic flat, algal mat, shallow lacustrine to semi-deep lacustrine subfacies, quasi-syngenetic dolomitization, upper member of Xiaganchaigou Formation, Paleogene, Nanyishan area, northwestern Qaidam Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2
[1] 夏青松,田景春,倪新锋.湖相碳酸盐岩研究现状及意义[J].沉积与特提斯地质, 2003, 23(1):105-112. XIA Qingsong, TIAN Jingchun, NI Xinfeng. Lacustrine carbonate rocks in China:An overview[J]. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 2003, 23(1):105-112.
[2] 蒲秀刚,周立宏,肖敦清,等.黄骅坳陷歧口凹陷西南缘湖相碳酸盐岩地质特征[J].石油勘探与开发, 2011, 38(2):136-144. PU Xiugang, ZHOU Lihong, XIAO Dunqing, et al. Lacustrine carbonates in the southwest margin of Qikou Sag, Huanghua Depression, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2011, 38(2):136-144.
[3] 周自立,杜韫华.湖相碳酸盐岩的沉积相与油气分布关系:以山东胜利油田下第三系碳酸盐岩为例[J].石油实验地质, 1986, 8(2):123-132. ZHOU Zili, DU Yunhua. Relationship between sedimentary facies of lacustrine carbonate rocks and oil and gas distribution[J]. Petroleum Geology&Experiment, 1986, 8(2):123-132.
[4] COHEN A S, THOUIN C. Near-shore carbonate deposits in Lake Tanganyika[J]. Geology, 1987, 15(5):414-418.
[5] BENSON L. Factors affecting 14C ages of lacustrine carbonates:Timing and duration of the last highstand lake in the Labontan Basin[J]. Quatern Research, 1993, 39(2):163-174.
[6] BUSTILLO M A, ARRIBAS M E, BUSTILLO M. Dolomitization and silicification in low-energy lacustrine carbonates (Paleogene, Madrid Basin, Spin)[J]. Sedimentary Geology, 2002, 151(1/2):107-126.
[7] TUEHER M E, WRIGHT V P. Carbonate sedimentology[M]. Oxford:Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1990:482.
[8] 万传治,王鹏,薛建勤,等.柴达木盆地柴西地区古近系-新近系致密油勘探潜力分析[J].岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(3):26-31. WAN Chuanzhi, WANG Peng, XUE Jianqin, et al. Exploration potential of tight oil of the Paleogene and Neogene in western Qaidam Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2015, 27(3):26-31.
[9] 党玉琪,陈子炓,施泽进,等.达木盆地西部南翼山浅油藏储层特征[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 31(5):498-504. DANG Yuqi, CHEN Ziliao, SHI Zejin, et al. Reservoir characteristics of Nanyishan shallow oil pool in west of Qaidam Basin, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science&Technology Edition), 2004, 31(5):498-504.
[10] 魏莉,李建明,马力宁.柴达木盆地南翼山油田新近系储层特征[J].长江大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 8(9):20-23. WEI Li, LI Jianming, MA Lining. Neogene reservoir characteristics of Nanyishan oilfield in Qaidam Basin[J]. Journal of Yangtze University (Natural Science Edition), 2011, 8(9):20-23.
[11] 吴昌吉,包慧涛,张俊峰,等.柴达木盆地南翼山油田低渗透储层特征[J].中国石油和化工标准与质量, 2013, 34(1):175-177. WU Changji, BAO Huitao, ZHANG Junfeng, et al. Characteristics of low permeability reservoir in Nanyishan oilfield, Qaidam Basin[J]. China Petroleum and Chemical Standard and Quality, 2013, 34(1):175-177.
[12] 庄玮,邓先伟,高旭明,等.柴达木盆地南翼山浅油藏油砂山组储层岩石学特征[J].科学技术与工程, 2012, 12(15):3729-3732. ZHUANG Wei, DENG Xianwei, GAO Xuming, et al. Lithology characteristics of Nanyishan shallow oil pool in Qaidam Basin, China[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2012, 12(15):3729-3732.
[13] 刘菲,李建明,曾婷,等.柴达木盆地南翼山上新统碳酸盐岩储层特征[J].内蒙古石油化工, 2007, 124(12):364-367. LIU Fei, LI Jianming, ZENG Ting, et al. Pliocene carbonate reservoir characteristics of Nanyishan in Qaidam Basin, China[J]. Inner Mongolia Petrochemical Industry, 2007, 124(12):364-367.
[14] 吴兴录.柴达木盆地南翼山构造裂缝储层特征[J].特种油气藏, 2003, 10(6):16-19. WU Xinglu. Characteristics of tectoclase reservoirs in Nanyishan of Qaidam Basin[J]. Special Oil&Gas Reservoirs, 2003, 10(6):16-19.
[15] 王建功,张道伟,易定红,等.柴西地区下干柴沟组上段湖相碳酸盐岩沉积特征及相模式[J].岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(4):1-13. WANG Jiangong, ZHANG Daowei, YI Dinghong, et al. Depositional characteristics and facies model of lacustrine carbonate rock in the upper member of lower Ganchaigou Formation in western Qaidam Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(4):1-13.
[16] 崔俊,毛建英,陈登钱,等.柴达木盆地西部地区古近系湖相碳酸盐岩储层特征[J].岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(2):45-53. CUI Jun, MAO Jianying, CHEN Dengqian, et al. Reservoir characteristics of Paleogene lacustrine carbonate rocks in western Qaidam Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(2):45-53.
[17] 黄成刚,袁剑英,曹正林,等.咸化湖盆储集层中咸水流体与岩石矿物相互作用实验模拟研究[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2015, 34(2):343-348. HUANG Chenggang, YUAN Jianying, CAO Zhenglin, et al. Simulate experiment study about the saline fluid-rock interaction in the clastic reservoir of the Saline Lacustrine Basin[J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 2015, 34(2):343-348.
[18] 石油地质勘探专业标准化委员会.油气储层评价方法:SY/T 6285-2011[S].北京:石油工业出版社, 2011. Petroleum Exploration Standardization Technical Committee. Evaluating methods of oil and gas reservoirs:SY/T 6285-2011[S]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2011.
[19] 刘文栋,钟大康,尹宏,等.川西北栖霞组超深层白云岩储层特征及主控因素[J].中国矿业大学学报, 2021, 50(2):342-362. LIU Wendong, ZHONG Dakang, YIN Hong, et al. Development characteristics and main controlling factors of ultra-deep dolomite reservoirs of the Qixia formation in the northwestern Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of China University of Mining&Technology, 2021, 50(2):342-362.
[20] 袁晓宇.柴达木盆地英西地区古近系下干柴沟组上段沉积与成岩作用[D].兰州:兰州大学, 2019. YUAN Xiaoyu. Sedimentation and diagenesis of upper member of Paleogene Xiaganchaigou Formation in Yingxi area, Qaidam Basin[D]. Lanzhou:Lanzhou University, 2019.
[21] 贾承造,邹才能,李建忠,等.中国致密油评价标准、主要类型、基本特征及资源前景[J].石油学报, 2012, 33(3):343-350. JIA Chengzao, ZOU Caineng, LI Jianzhong, et al. Assessment criteria, main types, basic features and resource prospects of the tight oil in China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(3):343-350.
[22] 袁剑英,黄成刚,夏青松,等.咸化湖盆碳酸盐岩储层特征及孔隙形成机理:以柴西地区始新统下干柴沟组为例[J].地质论评, 2016, 62(1):111-126. YUAN Jianying, HUANG Chenggang, XIA Qingsong, et al. The characteristics of carbonate reservoir, and formation mechanism of pores in the Saline Lacustrine Basin:A case study of the lower Eocene Ganchaigou Formation in western Qaidam Basin[J]. Geological Review, 2016, 62(1):111-126.
[23] 文华国,郑荣才, QING Hairuo,等.青藏高原北缘酒泉盆地青西凹陷白垩系湖相热水沉积原生白云岩[J].中国科学:地球科学, 2014, 44(4):591-604. WEN Huaguo, ZHENG Rongcai, QING Hairuo, et al. Primary dolostone related to the Cretaceous lacustrine hydrothermal sedimentation in Qingxi Sag, Jiuquan Basin on the northern Tibetan Plateau[J]. Scientia Sinica (Terrae), 2014, 44(4):591-604.
[24] 冯进来,曹剑,胡凯,等.柴达木盆地中深层混积岩储层形成机制[J].岩石学报, 2011, 27(8):2461-2472. FENG Jinlai, CAO Jian, HU Kai, et al. Forming mechanism of middle-deep mixed rock reservoir in the Qaidam Basin[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2011, 27(8):2461-2472.
[1] 周自强, 朱正平, 潘仁芳, 董於, 金吉能. 基于波形相控反演的致密砂岩储层模拟预测方法——以黄骅坳陷沧东凹陷南部古近系孔二段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 77-86.
[2] 张磊, 李莎, 罗波波, 吕伯强, 谢敏, 陈新平, 陈冬霞, 邓彩云. 东濮凹陷北部古近系沙三段超压岩性油气藏成藏机理[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 57-70.
[3] 朱康乐, 高岗, 杨光达, 张东伟, 张莉莉, 朱毅秀, 李婧. 辽河坳陷清水洼陷古近系沙河街组深层烃源岩特征及油气成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 146-157.
[4] 西智博, 廖建平, 高荣锦, 周晓龙, 雷文文. 辽河坳陷陈家断裂带北部构造演化解析及油气成藏[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 127-136.
[5] 冯斌, 黄晓波, 何幼斌, 李华, 罗进雄, 李涛, 周晓光. 渤海湾盆地庙西北地区古近系沙河街组三段源-汇系统重建[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 84-95.
[6] 方旭庆, 钟骑, 张建国, 李军亮, 孟涛, 姜在兴, 赵海波. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷古近系沙三下亚段旋回地层学分析及地层划分[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 19-30.
[7] 王亚, 刘宗宾, 路研, 王永平, 刘超. 基于SSOM的流动单元划分方法及生产应用——以渤海湾盆地F油田古近系沙三中亚段湖底浊积水道为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 160-169.
[8] 牛成民, 惠冠洲, 杜晓峰, 官大勇, 王冰洁, 王启明, 张宏国. 辽中凹陷西斜坡古近系东三段湖底扇发育模式及大油田发现[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 33-42.
[9] 李盛谦, 曾溅辉, 刘亚洲, 李淼, 焦盼盼. 东海盆地西湖凹陷孔雀亭地区古近系平湖组储层成岩作用及孔隙演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 49-61.
[10] 胡望水, 高飞跃, 李明, 郭志杰, 王世超, 李相明, 李圣明, 揭琼. 渤海湾盆地廊固凹陷古近系沙河街组油藏单元精细表征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 92-99.
[11] 曾旭, 卞从胜, 沈瑞, 周可佳, 刘伟, 周素彦, 汪晓鸾. 渤海湾盆地歧口凹陷古近系沙三段页岩油储层非线性渗流特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 40-50.
[12] 柳忠泉, 赵乐强, 曾治平, 田继军, 李正强, 罗锦昌, 胡美玲. 准噶尔盆地阜康断裂带二叠系芦草沟组页岩油成藏条件[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 126-137.
[13] 郑彬, 董翱, 张源智, 张毅, 苏珊, 张士超, 樊津津, 骆垠山. 济阳坳陷渤南洼陷古近系沙河街组流体压力建场过程及其石油地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 59-67.
[14] 应凯莹, 蔡长娥, 梁煜琦, 陈鸿, 尚文亮, 苏桂娇. 伊通盆地岔路河断陷古近系断层的垂向封闭性及其控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 136-143.
[15] 完颜泽, 龙国徽, 杨巍, 柴京超, 马新民, 唐丽, 赵健, 李海鹏. 柴达木盆地英雄岭地区古近系油气成藏过程及其演化特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 94-102.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 旷红伟,高振中,王正允,王晓光. 一种独特的隐蔽油藏——夏9井区成岩圈闭油藏成因分析及其对勘探的启迪[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 8 -14 .
[2] 李国军, 郑荣才,唐玉林,汪洋,唐楷. 川东北地区飞仙关组层序- 岩相古地理特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 64 -70 .
[3] 蔡佳. 琼东南盆地长昌凹陷新近系三亚组沉积相[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(5): 46 -54 .
[4] 章惠, 关达, 向雪梅, 陈勇. 川东北元坝东部须四段裂缝型致密砂岩储层预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(1): 133 -139 .
[5] 付广,刘博,吕延防. 泥岩盖层对各种相态天然气封闭能力综合评价方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 21 -26 .
[6] 马中良,曾溅辉,张善文,王永诗,王洪玉,刘惠民. 砂岩透镜体油运移过程模拟及成藏主控因素分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 69 -74 .
[7] 王英民. 对层序地层学工业化应用中层序分级混乱问题的探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 9 -15 .
[8] 卫平生, 潘树新, 王建功, 雷 明. 湖岸线和岩性地层油气藏的关系研究 —— 论“坳陷盆地湖岸线控油”[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 27 -31 .
[9] 易定红, 石兰亭, 贾义蓉. 吉尔嘎朗图凹陷宝饶洼槽阿尔善组层序地层与隐蔽油藏[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 68 -72 .
[10] 杨占龙, 彭立才, 陈启林, 郭精义, 李在光, 黄云峰. 吐哈盆地胜北洼陷岩性油气藏成藏条件与油气勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 62 -67 .