岩性油气藏 ›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4): 59–68.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20200406

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

松辽盆地苏家屯次洼初始裂陷期扇三角洲沉积特征

杨文杰1,2, 胡明毅1,2, 苏亚拉图3, 刘昌4, 元懿1,2, 李金池1,2   

  1. 1. 长江大学 地球科学学院, 武汉 430100;
    2. 油气资源与勘探技术教育部重点实验室, 武汉 430100;
    3. 中国石油华北油田公司 二连分公司, 河北 任丘 062550;
    4. 兰州大学 地质科学与矿产资源学院, 兰州 730000
  • 收稿日期:2019-09-19 修回日期:2019-11-25 出版日期:2020-08-01 发布日期:2020-06-16
  • 第一作者:杨文杰(1996-),男,长江大学在读硕士研究生,研究方向为储层沉积学与层序地层学。地址:(430100)湖北省武汉市蔡甸区大学路特1号长江大学。Email:201871273@yangtzeu.edu.cn
  • 通信作者: 胡明毅(1965-),男,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事沉积学与层序地层学方面的教学与研究工作。Email:humingyi65@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技重大专项“中国大型气田形成条件、富集规律及目标评价”(编号:2016ZX05007-002)、油气资源与勘探技术教育部重点实验室开放基金项目“断陷湖盆深层储层主控因素及分布规律研究”(编号:K2017-16)和长江大学优秀博士、硕士学位论文培育计划资助项目“梨树断陷苏家屯地区深部断陷发育期沉积体系与砂体分布研究”(编号:YS2018006)联合资助

Sedimentary characteristics of fan delta during initial rifting stage in Sujiatun sub-depression,Songliao Basin

YANG Wenjie1,2, HU Mingyi1,2, SUYA Latu3, LIU Chang4, YUAN Yi1,2, LI Jinchi1,2   

  1. 1. School of Earth Sciences, Yangtze University, Wuhan 430100, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Exploration Technologies for Oil and Gas Resources, Ministry of Education, Yangtze University, Wuhan 430100, China;
    3. Erlian Branch, PetroChina Huabei Oilfield Company, Renqiu 062550, Hebei, China;
    4. School of Earth Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
  • Received:2019-09-19 Revised:2019-11-25 Online:2020-08-01 Published:2020-06-16

摘要: 扇三角洲沉积砂砾岩体作为良好的油气储层,一直备受重视。为了深化对断陷盆地初始裂陷期扇三角洲沉积特征的认识,以松辽盆地苏家屯次洼火石岭组为研究对象,综合运用岩心、测井、三维地震资料和古地貌恢复技术,对初始裂陷期扇三角洲的发育规律、沉积特征和控制因素展开深入研究,建立了断陷湖盆初始裂陷期扇三角洲沉积模式。结果表明:①苏家屯次洼初始裂陷期发育东西双断的地堑式断陷湖盆,区内地形高差较大、构造运动活跃,沉积物源主要来自次洼西北、西南和东部等3个方向;②火石岭组形成时期广泛发育扇三角洲沉积体系,岩性以厚层杂色、灰色砂砾岩夹薄层灰色泥岩为主,测井曲线多呈高幅箱形或钟形,在地震剖面上多表现为斜交前积反射、楔状或丘状杂乱反射结构;③沉积体系展布受控盆断裂和古地貌控制,形成"中部凹陷带湖相、东西断阶带扇三角洲相"的沉积格局以及"中部生烃、两侧储集"的生储配置关系;④初始裂陷期构造活动是控制扇三角洲体系发育的主导因素,控盆断裂不仅控制着沉积相带和储层砂体的分布,也持续影响着断陷湖盆的沉积充填演化。该研究成果可为陆相盆地断陷深部的油气勘探提供地质依据。

关键词: 扇三角洲, 初始裂陷期, 沉积特征, 火石岭组, 松辽盆地

Abstract: As a kind of good oil and gas reservoir,sandy conglomerate bodies of fan delta have been paid more attention. In order to deepen the understanding of the sedimentary characteristics of the fan delta during the initial rifting stage in the fault basin,taking Huoshiling Formation in Sujiatun sub-depression of Songliao Basin as an example,the development rules,sedimentary characteristics and controlling factors of fan delta in the initial rifting stage were studied by using core,well logging,three-dimensional seismic data and paleogeomorphic restoring technology. The fan delta sedimentary model in the initial rifting stage of the faulted lacustrine basin was established. The results show that:(1)During the initial rifting stage of Sujiatun sub-depression,there was a grabentype faulted lake basin with EW double faults developed,the terrain height difference was large within the area, the tectonic movement was active,and the sediment source were mainly from the northwest,southwest and east of the sub-depression.(2)During the formation stage of Huoshiling Formation,fan delta sedimentary system was widely developed. The lithology was dominated by thick bedded variegated and gray sandy conglomerate with thin bedded gray mudstone. The logging curves were mostly box or bell shaped with high amplitude. The fan delta deposits are characterized by oblique progradation reflection,wedge-shaped or mound shaped disordered reflection structure on the seismic section.(3)The distribution of the sedimentary system was mainly controlled by basin faults and paleogeomorphology,forming the sedimentary pattern of "lacustrine facies across the central sag,fan delta facies in the east-west fault terrace" and the source reservoir assemblage of "hydrocarbon generation in the center and reservoirs on both sides".(4)The structural activity in the initial rifting stage is the main controlling factor for the development of fan delta system. The basin-controlling fault not only controls the distribution of sedimentary facies belt and reservoir sand bodies,but also continuously affects the sedimentary filling evolution trend of faulted lacustrine basins. The research results could provide a geological basis for oil and gas exploration in deep strata of fault depression of continental basin.

Key words: fan delta, initial rifting stage, sedimentary characteristics, Huoshiling Formation, Songliao Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE121.3
[1] 黄薇, 杨步增, 孙立东, 等.松辽盆地北部深层断陷分布规律及勘探潜力.大庆石油地质与开发, 2014, 33(5):76-81. HUANG W, YANG B Z, SUN L D, et al. Distribution rule and exploration potential of deep fault depression in northern Songliao Basin. Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2014, 33(5):76-81.
[2] 赵泽辉, 徐淑娟, 姜晓华, 等.松辽盆地深层地质结构及致密砂砾岩气勘探.石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43(1):12-23. ZHAO Z H, XU S J, JIANG X H, et al. Deep strata geological structure and tight conglomerate gas exploration in Songliao Basin, East China.Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43(1):12-23.
[3] 刘磊, 钟怡江, 陈洪德, 等.中国东部箕状断陷湖盆扇三角洲与辫状河三角洲对比研究.沉积学报, 2015, 33(6):1170-1181. LIU L, ZHONG Y J, CHEN H D, et al. Contrastive research of fan deltas and braided river deltas in half-graben rift lake basin in east China. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2015, 33(6):1170-1181.
[4] 张弛, 吴朝东, 谢利华, 等.松辽盆地东岭地区早白垩世小型断陷的充填特征与演化过程.北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 48(2):253-261. ZHANG C, WU C D, XIE L H, et al. Filling characteristics and evolution analysis of the early cretaceous small fault depression in Dongling region, Songliao Basin. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2012, 48(2):253-261.
[5] 姜辉.裂陷晚期浅水三角洲沉积特征及其分布规律:以印度尼西亚Sunda盆地渐新统上段为例.中国石油勘探, 2018, 23(5):73-78. JIANG H. The depositional characteristics and distribution law of shallow-water delta during late rifting stage:a case study on the Upper Oligocene in the Sunda Basin, Indonesia. China Petroleum Exploration, 2018, 23(5):73-78.
[6] GAWTHORPE R L, LEEDER M R. Tectono-sedimentary evolution of active extensional basins. Basin Research, 2000, 12(3/4):195-218.
[7] JIA H, JI H, WANG L, et al. Tectono-sedimentary and hydrocarbon potential analysis of rift-related successions in the Dehui Depression, Songliao Basin, northeastern China. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2016(76):262-278.
[8] 朱兆群, 林承焰, 张宪国, 等.断陷湖盆早期浅水三角洲沉积:以高邮凹陷永安地区戴一段为例.吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(3):659-673. ZHU Z Q, LIN C Y, ZHANG X G, et al. Shallow-water delta deposits in a rifting lacustrine basin during early stage:a case study of the first member of Dainan Formation at Yong'an area, Gaoyou Sag. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(3):659-673.
[9] 杨特波, 王宏语, 樊太亮, 等.梨树断陷苏家屯地区营城组沉积特征.石油与天然气地质, 2013, 34(3):349-356. YANG T B, WANG H Y, FAN T L, et al. Sedimentary characteristics of Yingcheng Formation in the Sujiatun area, Lishu rift in Songliao Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 2013, 34(3):349-356.
[10] 陈贤良, 纪友亮, 樊太亮, 等.松辽盆地梨树断陷层序地层格架及沉积体系分布.高校地质学报, 2014, 20(1):122-130. CHEN X L, JI Y L, FAN T L, et al. Sequence stratigraphic framework and sedimentary system distribution in the Lishu rift, Songliao Basin. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2014, 20(1):122-130.
[11] 王黎, 王果寿, 邱岐, 等.松辽盆地梨树断陷深部层系沉积特征及演化分析.石油实验地质, 2014, 36(3):316-324. WANG L, WANG G S, QIU Q, et al. Sedimentary features and evolution of deep series in Lishu Fault Depression, Songliao Basin. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2014, 36(3):316-324.
[12] TESCH P, REECE R S, POPE M C, et al. Quantification of architectural variability and controls in an Upper Oligocene to Lower Miocene carbonate ramp, Browse Basin, Australia. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2018, 91:432-454.
[13] 武爱俊, 徐建永, 滕彬彬, 等. "动态物源"精细刻画方法与应用:以琼东南盆地崖南凹陷为例.岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(4):55-63. WU A J, XU J Y, TENG B B, et al. Fine description method of dynamic provenance and its application:a case fromYanan Sag, Qiongdongnan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(4):55-63.
[14] POSAMENTIER H W, DAVIES R J, CARTWRIGHT J A, et al. Seismic geomorphology an overview. Geological Society London Special Publications, 2007, 277(1):1-14.
[15] 于兴河, 瞿建华, 谭程鹏, 等.玛湖凹陷百口泉组扇三角洲砾岩岩相及成因模式.新疆石油地质, 2014, 35(6):619-627. YU X H, QU J H, TAN C P, et al. Lithofacies and genetic model of conglomerate in fan delta of Baikouquan Formation in Mahu Sag. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2014, 35(6):619-627.
[16] 蔡全升, 胡明毅, 陈孝红, 等.小型断陷湖盆扇三角洲沉积特征与发育模式:以徐家围子断陷北部沙河子组为例.岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(1):86-96. CAI Q S, HU M Y, CHEN X H, et al. Sedimentary characteristics and development model of the fan delta in a small fault depression:a case study of Shahezi Formation in the north of Xujiaweizi fault depression. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(1):86-96.
[17] 邹妞妞, 张大权, 史基安, 等.准噶尔西北缘玛北地区扇三角洲砂砾岩岩相分类及储集意义.地质学报, 2017, 91(2):440-452. ZOU N N, ZHANG D Q, SHI J A, et al. Lithofacies classification of glutenite in the fan delta of the Mabei Area in the Northwestern Junggar Basin and its reservoir significance. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2017, 91(2):440-452.
[18] 林佳佳, 阮宝涛, 胡明毅, 等.松辽盆地梨树断陷苏家屯地区火石岭组-营城组地震相与沉积相. 东北石油大学学报, 2019, 43(1):87-98. LIN J J, RUAN B T, HU M Y, et al. Seismic facies and sedimentary facies of Huoshiling Formation-Yingcheng Formation in Sujiatun region, Lishu fault depression, Songliao Basin. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2019, 43(1):87-98.
[19] 余海波, 程秀申, 漆家福, 等.东濮凹陷古近纪断裂活动对沉积的控制作用.岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(5):12-23. YU H B, CHENG X S, QI J F, et al. Control of fault activity on sedimentation of paleogene in Dongpu Sag. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(5):12-23.
[20] 于浩业, 赵卫军, 欧亚平, 等.鲍金根地堑断裂坡折带油气藏特征及有利勘探区.新疆石油地质, 2016, 37(4):494-498. YU H Y, ZHAO W J, OU Y P, et al. Petroleum reservoir characteristics and favorable exploration areas in faulted slope-break zone of Bozingen Graben, Kazakhstan. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2016, 37(4):494-498.
[21] 张建林, 林畅松, 郑和荣.断陷湖盆断裂、古地貌及物源对沉积体系的控制作用:以孤北洼陷沙三段为例.油气地质与采收率, 2002, 9(4):24-27. ZHANG J L, LIN C S, ZHENG H R. Controlling action of fractures, palaeogeomorphology and material sources of rift lake basin on sedimentary system:Taking Es3 Gubei subsag as example. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2002, 9(4):24-27.
[22] WU D, ZHU X M, ZHI L I, et al. Depositional models in Cretaceous rift stage of Fula sag, Muglad Basin, Sudan. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(3):348-357.
[23] 于兴河, 姜辉, 李胜利, 等.中国东部中、新生代陆相断陷盆地沉积充填模式及其控制因素:以济阳坳陷东营凹陷为例.岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1):39-45. YU X H, JIANG H, LI S L, et al. Depositional filling models and controlling factors on Mesozoic and Cenozoic fault basins of terrestrial facies in eastern China:a case study of Dongying Sag in Jiyang Depression. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(1):39-45.
[24] 胡受权, 郭文平, 颜其彬, 等.断陷湖盆陆相层序中体系域四分性探讨:泌阳断陷下第三系核桃园组为例. 石油学报, 2000, 21(1):23-28. HU S Q, GUO W P, YAN Q B, et al. Discussion on system tract four-division for a terrigenous sequence stratigraphy in fault-depressed lacustrine basin Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2000, 21(1):23-28.
[25] 陈岑, 胡望水, 熊壮, 等.松辽盆地梨树断陷营城组一段页岩气成藏条件分析.科学技术与工程, 2013, 13(21):6066-6071. CHEN C, HU W S, XIONG Z, et al. Reservoir forming conditions of shale gas in the first member of Yingcheng Formation of Lishu Fault, Songliao Basin. Science Technology and Engineering, 2013, 13(21):6066-6071.
[1] 冉逸轩, 王健, 张熠. 松辽盆地北部中央古隆起基岩气藏形成条件与有利勘探区[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 66-76.
[2] 屈卫华, 田野, 董常春, 郭小波, 李立立, 林斯雅, 薛松, 杨世和. 松辽盆地德惠断陷白垩系烃源岩特征及其控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 122-134.
[3] 王洪星, 韩诗文, 胡佳, 潘志浩. 松辽盆地德惠断陷白垩系火石岭组凝灰岩储层预测及成藏主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 35-45.
[4] 杨为华. 松辽盆地双城断陷白垩系营城组四段致密油成藏主控因素及模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 25-34.
[5] 周洪锋, 吴海红, 杨禹希, 向红英, 高吉宏, 贺昊文, 赵旭. 二连盆地巴音都兰凹陷B51井区白垩系阿四段扇三角洲前缘沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 85-97.
[6] 田亚, 李军辉, 陈方举, 李跃, 刘华晔, 邹越, 张晓扬. 海拉尔盆地中部断陷带下白垩统南屯组致密储层特征及有利区预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 136-146.
[7] 冯斌, 黄晓波, 何幼斌, 李华, 罗进雄, 李涛, 周晓光. 渤海湾盆地庙西北地区古近系沙河街组三段源-汇系统重建[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 84-95.
[8] 何文渊, 赵莹, 钟建华, 孙宁亮. 松辽盆地古龙凹陷白垩系青山口组页岩油储层中微米孔缝特征及油气意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 1-18.
[9] 王天海, 许多年, 吴涛, 关新, 谢再波, 陶辉飞. 准噶尔盆地沙湾凹陷三叠系百口泉组沉积相展布特征及沉积模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 98-110.
[10] 齐育楷, 郭景祥, 罗亮, 骆福嵩, 周学文, 姚威, 张坦, 林会喜. 库车坳陷南部斜坡带隐蔽圈闭发育模式及勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 108-119.
[11] 杜长鹏. 松辽盆地莺山-双城断陷白垩系致密火山岩天然气成藏条件及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(4): 115-124.
[12] 王亮, 苏树特, 马梓柯, 蒲静, 姚蔺芳, 刘宇, 罗洋. 川中地区寒武系沧浪铺组沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 19-31.
[13] 杨帆, 卞保力, 刘慧颖, 姚宗全, 尤新才, 刘海磊, 卫延召. 玛湖凹陷二叠系夏子街组限制性湖盆扇三角洲沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(5): 63-72.
[14] 李晓辉, 杜晓峰, 官大勇, 王志萍, 王启明. 辽东湾坳陷东北部新近系馆陶组辫曲过渡型河流沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(3): 93-103.
[15] 张本健, 徐唱, 徐亮, 周刚, 丁熊. 四川盆地东北部三叠系飞三段沉积特征及油气地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(3): 154-163.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 魏钦廉, 郑荣才, 肖玲, 王成玉, 牛小兵. 鄂尔多斯盆地吴旗地区长6 储层特征及影响因素分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 45 -50 .
[2] 王东琪, 殷代印. 水驱油藏相对渗透率曲线经验公式研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(3): 159 -164 .
[3] 李云,时志强. 四川盆地中部须家河组致密砂岩储层流体包裹体研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 27 -32 .
[4] 蒋韧,樊太亮,徐守礼. 地震地貌学概念与分析技术[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 33 -38 .
[5] 邹明亮,黄思静,胡作维,冯文立,刘昊年. 西湖凹陷平湖组砂岩中碳酸盐胶结物形成机制及其对储层质量的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 47 -52 .
[6] 王冰洁,何生,倪军娥,方度. 板桥凹陷钱圈地区主干断裂活动性分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 75 -82 .
[7] 陈振标,张超谟,张占松,令狐松,孙宝佃. 利用NMRT2谱分布研究储层岩石孔隙分形结构[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 105 -110 .
[8] 张厚福,徐兆辉. 从油气藏研究的历史论地层-岩性油气藏勘探[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 114 -123 .
[9] 张 霞. 勘探创造力的培养[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 16 -20 .
[10] 杨午阳, 杨文采, 刘全新, 王西文. 三维F-X域粘弹性波动方程保幅偏移方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 86 -91 .