岩性油气藏 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 93–103.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20220309

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

辽东湾坳陷东北部新近系馆陶组辫曲过渡型河流沉积特征

李晓辉, 杜晓峰, 官大勇, 王志萍, 王启明   

  1. 中海石油 (中国) 有限公司天津分公司, 天津 300459
  • 收稿日期:2021-09-15 修回日期:2021-10-18 出版日期:2022-05-01 发布日期:2022-05-12
  • 作者简介:李晓辉(1990-),男,硕士,工程师,主要从事层序地层与沉积储层方面的研究工作。地址:(300459)天津市滨海新区海川路2121号。Email:lixh79@cnooc.com.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    中海石油（中国）有限公司科技重大专项“渤海上产4000万吨新领域关键技术”（编号：CNOOC-KJ135ZDXM36TJ08TJ）资助

Sedimentary characteristics of braided-meandering transitional river of Neogene Guantao Formation in northeastern Liaodong Bay Depression

LI Xiaohui, DU Xiaofeng, GUAN Dayong, WANG Zhiping, WANG Qiming   

  1. Tianjin Branch of CNOOC Ltd., Tianjin 300459, China
  • Received:2021-09-15 Revised:2021-10-18 Online:2022-05-01 Published:2022-05-12

PDF (PC)

148

摘要： 辫曲过渡型河流是发育于辫状河向曲流河演化过程中的一种河流类型。综合现代沉积类比、构造演化分析、岩心分析与地震正演，对渤海湾盆地辽东湾坳陷东北部新近系馆陶组沉积体系类型及沉积演化规律进行了研究，并在层序分析的基础上，对馆陶组辫状河、曲流河与辫曲过渡型河流等3种沉积类型的宏观和微观沉积特征、成藏条件进行了对比。研究结果表明：①辽东湾坳陷东北部馆陶组沉积时期，沉积体系由辫状河向曲流河逐渐过渡，其中在馆中段沉积期发育辫曲过渡型河流沉积。②辫曲过渡型河流具有水动力较强、垂向加积与侧向加积相复合、储层发育程度与成熟度适中、砂泥岩低频互层、测井曲线呈箱形与钟形相叠加的沉积特征。③相对于辫状河与曲流河储层，辫曲过渡型河流储层横向连通性好，垂向上间隔发育规模性泥岩夹层，具备更好的储盖组合条件，更有利于油气规模性聚集成藏。

关键词: 辫曲过渡型河流, 辫状河, 曲流河, 沉积特征, 馆陶组, 新近系, 辽东湾坳陷

Abstract: Braided-meandering transitional river is a type of river developed in the process of braided river transforming to meandering river. Based on modern sedimentary analogy，tectonic evolution analysis，core analysis and seismic forward modeling analysis，the sedimentary system types and sedimentary evolution law of Neogene Guantao Formation in northeastern Liaodong Bay Depression of Bohai Bay Basin were studied. Under the control of sequence strata，the macro and micro sedimentary characteristics and reservoir accumulation conditions of three sedimentary systems of Guantao Formation，including braided river，meandering river and braided-meandering transitional river，were compared. The results show that： （1）During the sedimentary period of Guantao Formation in northeastern Liaodong Bay Depression，the sedimentary system gradually transited from braided river to meandering river，and braided-meandering transitional river developed in the middle Guantao Formation.（2）The braided-meandering transitional river are characterized by strong hydrodynamic force，combined vertical accretion and lateral accretion，moderate reservoir development and maturity，low-frequency interbedded sandstone and mudstone，and superposition of box-shaped and bell-shaped logging curves.（3）Compared with the reservoirs of braided river and meandering river，the braided-meandering transitional river reservoirs have better lateral connectivity，large-scale mudstone interlayers developed at vertical intervals，and better reservoir-cap assemblage conditions，which determines that they are more conducive to large-scale hydrocarbon accumulation.

Key words: braided-meandering transitional river, braided river, meandering river, sedimentary characteristics, Guantao Formation, Neogene, Liaodong Bay Depression

中图分类号: 

  • TE121
[1] 林玉祥,孟彩,韩继雷,等.华北地台区古近纪-新近纪岩相古地理特征[J].中国地质, 2015, 42(4):1058-1067. LIN Yuxiang, MENG Cai, HAN Jilei, et al. Characteristics of lithofacies paleogeography during Paleogene-Neogene in the area of north China platform[J]. Geology in China, 2015, 42(4):1058-1067.
[2] 梁金萍,国景星,于洪洲.冲积-河流相层序地层模式探讨及其在济阳坳陷的应用[J].油气地质与采收率, 2015, 12(1):19-21. LIANG Jinping, GUO Jingxing, YU Hongzhou. Discussion on the stratigraphic model in alluvial-fluvial facies sequence and its application in Jiyang Depression[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2015, 12(1):19-21.
[3] 陈飞,胡光义,范廷恩,等.渤海海域W油田新近系明化镇组河流相砂体结构特征[J].地学前缘, 2015, 22(2):207-213. CHEN Fei, HU Guangyi, FAN Ting'en, et al. Sandbody architecture and sequence stratigraphy of fluvial facies,Neogene Minghuazhen Formation, W oilfield, Bohai Bay[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2015, 22(2):207-213.
[4] 胡光义,陈飞,范廷恩,等.渤海海域S油田新近系明化镇组河流相复合砂体叠置样式分析[J].沉积学报, 2014, 32(3):586-592. HU Guangyi, CHEN Fei, FAN Ting'en, et al. Analysis of fluvial facies compound sandbody architecture of the Neogene Minghuazhen Formation of S oilfield in the Bohai Bay[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2014, 32(3):586-592.
[5] 赵春明,胡景双,霍春亮,等.曲流河与辫状河沉积砂体连通模式及开发特征:以渤海地区秦皇岛32-6油田为例[J].油气地质与采收率, 2009, 16(6):88-91. ZHAO Chunming, HU Jingshuang, HUO Chunliang, et al. Sandbody interconnectivity architecture and development characteristics of meandering river and braided river deposits:A case study of Qinhuangdao 32-6 oilfield,Bohai area[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2009, 16(6):88-91.
[6] 朱筱敏.沉积岩石学[M].北京:石油工业出版社, 2008:257. ZHU Xiaomin. Sedimentary petrology[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2008:257.
[7] 徐中波,康凯,申春生,等.渤海海域L油田新近系明化镇组下段与馆陶组储层沉积微相研究[J].岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(5):161-166. XU Zhongbo, KANG Kai, SHEN Chunsheng, et al. Sedimentary microfacies of Neogene Guantao Formation and lower Minghuazhen Formation in L oilfield, Baohai Bay[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2015, 27(5):161-166.
[8] 赵小萌,郭峰,彭晓霞,等.鄂尔多斯盆地安边地区延10砂质辫状河相储层特征及主控因素[J].岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(5):1-11. ZHAO Xiaomeng, GUO Feng, PENG Xiaoxia, et al. Reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors of Yan 10 sandy braided fluvial facies in Anbian area, Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(5):1-11.
[9] 刘丽.埕岛油田馆陶组曲流河砂体叠置模式[J].岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(1):40-48. LIU Li. Sandbody superimposed pattern of meandering river facies of Guantao Formation in Chengdao oilfield[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(1):40-48.
[10] 刘海,林承焰,张宪国.孔店油田馆陶组辫状河-曲流河转换及其控制因素[J].断块油气田, 2017, 24(6):735-739. LIU Hai, LIN Chengyan, ZHANG Xianguo. Controlling factors and transformation from braided river to meandering river, Guantao Formation, Kongdian oilfield[J]. Fault-Block Oil&Gas Field, 2017, 24(6):735-739.
[11] 倪晋仁,王随继,王光谦.现代冲积河流的河型空间转化模式探讨[J].沉积学报, 2000, 18(1):1-6. NI Jinren, WANG Suiji, WANG Guangqian. Spatial variations of channel patterns[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2000, 18(1):1-6.
[12] 王航,杨海风,黄振,等.基于可容纳空间变化的河流相演化新模式及其控藏作用:以莱州湾凹陷垦利A构造为例[J].岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5):73-83. WANG Hang, YANG Haifeng, HUANG Zhen, et al. A new model for sedimentary evolution of fluvial faices based on accommodation space change and its impact on hydrocarbon accumulation:A case study of Kenli-A structure in Laizhouwan Depression[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(5):73-83.
[13] WALKER R G. Facies models:Geosciences Canada reprint series[M]. Ontario:Geological Association of Canada, 1980:211.
[14] SCHUMM S A. Patterns of alluvial rivers[J]. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 1985, 13(1):5-27.
[15] HOOKE J M. River channel adjustment to meander cutoffs on the River Bollin and River Dane, northwest England[J]. Geomorphology, 1995, 14(3):235-253.
[16] 谭程鹏,于兴河,李胜利,等.辫状河-曲流河转换模式探讨:以准噶尔盆地南缘头屯河组露头为例[J].沉积学报, 2014, 32(3):450-458. TAN Chengpeng, YU Xinghe, LI Shengli, et al. Discussion on the model of braided river transform to meandering river:As an example of Toutunhe Formation in southern Junggar Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2014, 32(3):450-458.
[17] 李胜利,于兴河,姜涛,等.河流辫-曲转换特点与废弃河道模式[J].沉积学报, 2017, 35(1):1-9. LI Shengli, YU Xinghe, JIANG Tao, et al. Meander-braided transition feature and abandoned channel patterns in fluvial environment[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2017, 35(1):1-9.
[18] 吴伟,林畅松,周心怀,等.辽中凹陷高精度层序地层格架划分与沉积相研究[J].石油地球物理勘探, 2012, 47(1):133-141. WU Wei, LIN Changsong, ZHOU Xinhuai, et al. Seismic sedimentary facies study based on high-resolution sequence framework:A case study on sequence Sqd2 in Liaozhong Depression[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2012, 47(1):133-141.
[19] 南山,韩雪芳,潘玲黎,等.辽东湾海域锦州20-2气田沙河街组沉积相研究[J].岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(3):36-42. NAN Shan, HAN Xuefang, PAN Lingli, et al. Sedimentary facies of Shahejie Formation in Jinzhou 20-2 gas field in Liaodong Bay[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2013, 25(3):36-42.
[20] 肖锦泉.辽中凹陷及其邻区构造样式特征及其与油气的关系[D].成都:成都理工大学, 2015. XIAO Jinquan. Structural styles features and their relation with oil and gas in Liaozhong Depression and its adjacent areas[D]. Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology, 2015.
[21] 周园园,李虹霖,张如才,等.辽东凸起北段走滑断层特征及对油气成藏的控制[J].中国海上油气, 2018, 30(5):29-34. ZHOU Yuanyuan, LI Honglin, ZHANG Rucai, et al. Characteristics of strike-slip faults in the northern part of Liaodong salient and their control on hydrocarbon accumulation[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2018, 30(5):29-34.
[22] 徐长贵,彭靖淞,柳永军,等.辽中凹陷北部新构造运动及其石油地质意义[J].中国海上油气, 2016, 28(3):20-30. XU Changgui, PENG Jingsong, LIU Yongjun, et al. Neotectonic movement and its petroleum geology significance in northern Liaozhong Sag[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2016, 28(3):20-30.
[23] 易志凤,张尚锋,王雅宁,等.差异曲率下的曲流河点坝砂体定量表征:以黄河源区白河现代沉积为例[J].岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(1):1-10. YI Zhifeng, ZHANG Shangfeng, WANG Yaning, et al. Quantitative characterization of point bar sand bodies in meandering river under different curvatures:A case study of modern deposition of Baihe river in the source area of Yellow River[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(1):1-10.
[24] 杨有星,金振奎,白忠凯,等.辫状河单河道砂体接触关系及主控因素分析:以新疆克拉玛依,山西柳林、大同和陕西延安辫状河露头为例[J].岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(2):30-38. YANG Youxing, JIN Zhenkui, BAI Zhongkai, et al. Contact relationship and main controlling factors of braided river single channel sand body:A case of braided river from Karamay in Xinjiang, Liulin and Datong in Shanxi, Yan'an in Shaanxi[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(2):30-38.
[25] 贺雪晶,钟建华,曹梦春,等.河流相辫-曲河型转换控制因素与控制机理:以东营凹陷青西地区馆陶组为例[J].河南科学, 2018, 36(5):776-784. HE Xuejing, ZHONG Jianhua, CAO Mengchun, et al. The control factors and controlling mechanism of braided river-meandering river at Guantao Formation in northeast of the Dongying Sag[J]. Henan Science, 2018, 36(5):776-784.
[26] 陈聪,徐国盛,吴奎,等.辽东突起锦州23构造带油气成藏条件及成藏过程[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 45(5):539-549. CHEN Cong, XU Guosheng, WU Kui, et al. Study of oil and gas accumulation conditions and processes of the Jinzhou 23 structure,Liaodong uplift,China[J]. Journal of Chengdu university of Technology (Science&Technology Edition), 2018, 45(5):539-549.
[1] 张本健, 徐唱, 徐亮, 周刚, 丁熊. 四川盆地东北部三叠系飞三段沉积特征及油气地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(3): 154-163.
[2] 马正武, 官大勇, 王启明, 刘尧均, 李晓辉. 辽中凹陷古近系东三段湖底扇沉积特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(2): 131-140.
[3] 刘宗堡, 李雪, 郑荣华, 刘化清, 杨占龙, 曹松. 浅水三角洲前缘亚相储层沉积特征及沉积模式——以大庆长垣萨北油田北二区萨葡高油层为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(1): 1-13.
[4] 易志凤, 张尚锋, 王雅宁, 徐恩泽, 赵韶华, 王玉瑶. 差异曲率下的曲流河点坝砂体定量表征——以黄河源区白河现代沉积为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(1): 34-42.
[5] 赵小萌, 郭峰, 彭晓霞, 张翠萍, 郭岭, 师宇翔. 鄂尔多斯盆地安边地区延10砂质辫状河相储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(6): 124-134.
[6] 张本健, 田云英, 曾琪, 尹宏, 丁熊. 四川盆地西北部三叠系须三段砂砾岩沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 20-28.
[7] 杨丽莎, 陈彬滔, 马轮, 史忠生, 薛罗, 王磊, 史江龙, 赵艳军. 陆相湖盆坳陷期源—汇系统的要素特征及耦合关系——以南苏丹Melut盆地北部坳陷新近系Jimidi组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 27-38.
[8] 冯德浩, 刘成林, 田继先, 太万雪, 李培, 曾旭, 卢振东, 郭轩豪. 柴达木盆地一里坪地区新近系盆地模拟及有利区预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 74-84.
[9] 马永平, 张献文, 朱卡, 王国栋, 潘树新, 黄林军, 张寒, 关新. 玛湖凹陷二叠系上乌尔禾组扇三角洲沉积特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 57-70.
[10] 袁选俊, 周红英, 张志杰, 王子野, 成大伟, 郭浩, 张友焱, 董文彤. 坳陷湖盆大型浅水三角洲沉积特征与生长模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 1-11.
[11] 袁纯, 张惠良, 王波. 大型辫状河三角洲砂体构型与储层特征——以库车坳陷北部阿合组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 73-84.
[12] 吴青鹏, 吕锡敏, 陈娟, 周在华, 袁成. 酒泉盆地营尔凹陷下白垩统下沟组沉积特征及勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5): 54-62.
[13] 王航, 杨海风, 黄振, 白冰, 高雁飞. 基于可容纳空间变化的河流相演化新模式及其控藏作用——以莱州湾凹陷垦利A构造为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5): 73-83.
[14] 杨文杰, 胡明毅, 苏亚拉图, 刘昌, 元懿, 李金池. 松辽盆地苏家屯次洼初始裂陷期扇三角洲沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4): 59-68.
[15] 薛辉, 韩春元, 肖博雅, 王芳, 李玲. 蠡县斜坡高阳地区沙一下亚段浅水三角洲前缘沉积特征及模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4): 69-80.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发