塔北新和地区下白垩统舒善河组薄砂体沉积相特征及沉积模式

doi:10.12108/yxyqc.20230111

岩性油气藏 ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1): 120–131.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20230111

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇

塔北新和地区下白垩统舒善河组薄砂体沉积相特征及沉积模式

何春丰¹, 张翔^1,2, 田景春^1,2, 夏永涛³, 杨燕茹¹, 陈杰¹, 王鑫宇¹

1. 成都理工大学沉积地质研究院, 成都 610059;
2. 成都理工大学油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室, 成都 610059;
3. 中国石化西北油田分公司勘探开发研究院, 乌鲁木齐 830011

收稿日期:2022-05-27 修回日期:2022-07-21 发布日期:2023-01-06
通讯作者: 张翔(1978-),男,博士,副教授,主要从事沉积学、沉积地球化学等方面的教学与科研工作。Email:zhangxiang06@cdut.edu.cn。 E-mail:zhangxiang06@cdut.edu.cn
作者简介:何春丰(1993-),男,成都理工大学在读硕士研究生,研究方向为沉积学。地址:(610059)四川省成都市成华区二仙桥东三路1号成都理工大学。Email:1820728785@qq.com
基金资助:
中国石油化工股份有限公司科技开发项目“新和-三道桥地区白垩-古近系岩性圈闭潜力评价及区带优选研究”(编号: ky2019-s-074)资助

Sedimentary facies characteristics and sedimentary model of thin sand bodies of Lower Cretaceous Shushanhe Formation in Xinhe area, northern Tarim Basin

HE Chunfeng¹, ZHANG Xiang^1,2, TIAN Jingchun^1,2, XIA Yongtao³, YANG Yanru¹, CHEN Jie¹, WANG Xinyu¹

1. School of Sedimentary Geology, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China;
3. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, Northwest Oilfield Company, Sinopec, Urumqi 830011, China

Received:2022-05-27 Revised:2022-07-21 Published:2023-01-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 塔北新和地区下白垩统舒善河组是塔里木盆地北部岩性油气藏勘探的潜在领域之一。通过23口钻井资料和全覆盖三维地震资料解释成果，开展了塔北新和地区下白垩统舒善河组的地层划分，详细研究了舒善河组沉积微相特征及平面分布，并建立了薄砂体的沉积模式。研究结果表明:①塔北新和地区舒善河组与上覆巴西改组呈整合接触，超覆于沙雅隆起剥蚀基底之上，可划分为舒1段、舒2段和舒3段。②研究区舒善河组岩石类型主要为岩屑长石砂岩，其次为长石岩屑砂岩、长石砂岩，可识别出滨浅湖泥和滨浅湖砂坝微相。③研究区舒善河组沉积前发育“隆起、低隆起和洼地”三级古地貌，控制了沉积相的展布。舒1段沉积期沉积范围局限于洼地区，舒2段沉积期地层由洼地区向东西两侧超覆，沉积面积扩大，舒1段-舒2段沉积期由东、西两侧向中部呈滨湖-浅湖的相带展布特征；舒3段沉积期，研究区进一步湖侵为浅湖沉积。④研究区舒善河组薄砂体是重要的勘探领域，其分布受控于沉积前古地貌、湖平面变化和古水深。

关键词: 古地貌, 滨浅湖泥, 滨浅湖砂坝, 薄砂体, 舒善河组, 下白垩统, 新和地区, 塔北

Abstract: The Lower Cretaceous Shushanhe Formation in Xinhe area is one of the potential fields of lithologic reservoir exploration in northern Tarim Basin. Based on the drilling data from 15 wells and 3D seismic interpretation results，the stratigraphic division of Lower Cretaceous Shushanhe Formation in Xinhe area of northern Tarim Basin was carried out，the sedimentary microfacies characteristics and plane distribution of Shushanhe Formation were studied，and the sedimentary model of thin sand bodies was established. The results show that: (1) Shushanhe Formation in Xinhe area is in conformity contact with the overlying Baxigai Formation and overlying the denuded basement of Shaya uplift，and can be divided into Shu 1 member，Shu 2 member and Shu 3 member. (2) The rock of Shushanhe Formation in the study area is mainly lithic arkose，followed by feldspathic lithic sandstone and arkose. The microfacies of shore shallow lake mud and shore shallow lake sand bar can be identified. (3) Before the deposition of Shushanhe Formation in the study area，three-level paleogeomorphology of uplift， low uplift and depression developed，which controlled the distribution of sedimentary facies. During the sedimentary period of Shu 1 member，the sedimentary range is limited to the depression area. The strata of Shu 2 member overlapped from the depression area to the east and west sides，and the sedimentary area expanded. The sedimentary period of Shu 1 and Shu 2 members presents the distribution characteristics of shore-shallow lake facies belt from the east and west sides to the middle. During the sedimentary period of Shu 3 member，the study area was further transgressive into shallow lake sediments. (4) The thin sand bodies of Shushanhe Formation in the study area are important exploration fields，and their distribution is controlled by paleogeomorphology，lake level change and paleowater depth before sedimentation.

Key words: paleogeomorphology, shore-shallow lake mud, shore-shallow lake sand bar, thin sand body, Shushanhe Formation, Lower Cretaceous, Xinhe area, northern Tarim Basin

中图分类号:

TE122.2

何春丰, 张翔, 田景春, 夏永涛, 杨燕茹, 陈杰, 王鑫宇. 塔北新和地区下白垩统舒善河组薄砂体沉积相特征及沉积模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(1): 120–131.

HE Chunfeng, ZHANG Xiang, TIAN Jingchun, XIA Yongtao, YANG Yanru, CHEN Jie, WANG Xinyu. Sedimentary facies characteristics and sedimentary model of thin sand bodies of Lower Cretaceous Shushanhe Formation in Xinhe area, northern Tarim Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(1): 120–131.

参考文献

[1] 田军. 塔里木盆地油气勘探成果与勘探方向[J].新疆石油地质,2019,40(1):1-11.TIAN Jun. Petroleum exploration achievements and future targets of Tarim Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2019,40 (1): 1-11.
[2] 张荣虎,邹伟宏,陈戈,等. 塔里木盆地北部下白垩统大型湖相砂坝特征及油气勘探意义[J].石油学报,2018,39 (8): 845-857. ZHANG Ronghu,ZOU Weihong,CHEN Ge,et al. Characteristics and hydrocarbon exploration significance of the huge Lower Cretaceous lacustrine sand bar in the northern Tarim Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2018,39 (8): 845-857.
[3] 王家豪,王华,陈红汉,等. 前陆盆地的构造演化及其沉积、地层响应: 以库车坳陷下白垩统为例[J]. 地学前缘,2007,14 (4): 114-122. WANG Jiahao,WANG Hua,CHEN Honghan,et al. Research on the tectonic evolution of foreland basins and their responses to deposition and stratigraphy: An example from the Lower Cretaceous in Kuqa Depression[J]. Earth Science Frontiers,2007, 14 (4): 114-122.
[4] 谢大庆,郑蒙林,蒋华山,等. 塔里木盆地沙雅隆起形成演化与油气分布规律[J]. 大地构造与成矿学,2018,37 (3): 398-409. XIE Daqing,ZHENG Menglin,JIANG Huashan,et al. Formation and evolution of the Shaya Uplift and constraints on oil and gas distribution in the Tarim Basin[J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia,2018,37 (3): 398-409.
[5] 赵雪松,高志勇,冯佳睿,等. 库车前陆盆地三叠系-新近系重矿物组合特征与盆山构造演化关系[J].沉积学报,2014,32 (1): 68-77. ZHAO Xuesong,GAO Zhiyong,FENG Jiarui,et al. TriassicNeogene heavy minerals'assemblages characteristics and basinorogen tectonic evolution relationship in the Kuqa foreland basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2014,32 (1): 68-77.
[6] 肖建新,林畅松,刘景颜. 塔里木盆地北部库车坳陷白垩系层序地层与体系域特征[J].地球学报,2002,23 (5): 453-458. XIAO Jianxin,LIN Changsong,LIU Jingyan. Characteristics of Cretaceous sequence stratigraphy and system tract in Kuqa Depression northern Tarim Basin[J]. Acta Geoscientia Sinica,2002, 23 (5): 453-458.
[7] 梅冥相,于炳松,靳卫广. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷白垩纪层序地层格架及古地理演化[J].古地理学报,2004,6 (3): 261-277. MEI Mingxiang,YU Bingsong,JIN Weiguang. Sequence stratigraphic framework and palaeogeography evolution of the Cretaceous in Kuqa Depression,Tarim Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography,2004,6 (3): 261-277.
[8] 肖建新,林畅松,刘景颜. 乌什凹陷及东部邻区白垩系层序划分与沉积古地理[J].地学前缘,2008,15 (2): 8-18. XIAO Jianxin,LIN Changsong,LIU Jingyan. Depositional palaeogeography and division of Cretaceous sequence of Wushi Depression[J]. Earth Science Frontiers,2008,15 (2): 8-18.
[9] 夏辉,林畅松,刘永福,等. 塔北隆起西部卡普沙良群滩坝沉积特征[J].特种油气藏,2018,25 (6): 1-5. XIA Hui,LIN Changsong,LIU Yongfu,et al. Beach-bar sedimentation characterization of the Kapushaliang Group in the western north-Tarim Uplift[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2018,25 (6): 1-5.
[10] 刘勇,王振宇,马青. 英买力地区白垩系沉积特征及沉积相类型[J].新疆石油地质,2007,28 (1): 20-24. LIU Yong,MA Zhenyu,MA Qing. Characteristics and types of sedimentary facies of Cretaceous in Yinmaili area[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2007,28 (1): 20-24.
[11] 季丽丹,顾家裕,赵亮,等. 塔里木盆地乌什凹陷东部下白垩统沉积相及储层特征研究[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2009,31 (5): 478-484. JI Lidan,GU Jiayu,ZHAO Liang,et al. Research on sedimentary facies and reservoir characteristics of Lower Cretaceous in eastern Wushi Sag,Tarim Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2009,31 (5): 478-484.
[12] 张丽娟,李多丽,孙玉善,等. 库车坳陷西部古近系-白垩系沉积储层特征分析[J]. 天然气地球科学,2006,17 (3): 355-360. ZHANG Lijuan,LI Duoli,SUN Yushan,et al. Analysis of characteristics of sedimentary reservoir between Cretaceous and Palaeogene in the western part of the Kuqa Depression[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2006,17 (3): 355-360.
[13] 朱如凯,郭宏莉,高志勇,等. 塔里木盆地北部地区古近系-白垩系储层质量影响因素探讨[J]. 地质论评,2007,53 (5): 624-630. ZHU Rukai,GUO Hongli,GAO Zhiyong,et al. Probe into influence factors to the physical properties of the Cretaceous and Eogene reservoir in northern Tarim Basin[J]. Geological Review,2007,53 (5): 624-630.
[14] 沈杨,马玉杰,赵力彬,等. 库车坳陷东部古近系-白垩系储层控制因素及有利勘探区[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2009,30 (2): 136-142. SHEN Yang,MA Yujie,ZHAO Libin,et al. Controlling factors of the Paleogene Cretaceous reservoirs and potential exploration areas in the eastern Kuqa Depression[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2009,30 (2): 136-142.
[15] 崔海峰,郑多明,滕团余. 塔北隆起哈拉哈塘凹陷石油地质特征与油气勘探方向[J].岩性油气藏,2009,21 (2): 54-58. CUI Haifeng,ZHENG Duoming,TENG Tuanyu. Petroleum geologic characteristics and exploration orientation in Halahatang Depression of Tabei uplift[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2009, 21 (2): 54-58.
[16] 刘建良,刘可禹,姜振学,等. 库车前陆盆地玉东地区白垩系油气成藏过程[J].石油学报,2018,39 (6): 620-632. LIU Jianliang,LIU Keyu,JIANG Zhenxue,et al. Cretaceous hydrocarbon accumulation process in Yudong area,Kuqa foreland basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2018,39 (6): 620-632.
[17] 赵孟军,鲁雪松,卓勤功,等. 库车前陆盆地油气成藏特征与分布规律[J].石油学报,2015,36 (4): 395-404. ZHAO Mengjun,LU Xuesong,ZHUO Qingong,et al. Characteristics and distribution law of hydrocarbon accumulation in Kuqa foreland basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36 (4): 395-404.
[18] 钟国城,韩强,蒲仁海,等. 新和南部地区白垩系地震烃类检测与有利区预测[J].特种油气藏,2017,24 (1): 58-63. ZHONG Guocheng,HAN Qiang,PU Renhai,et al. Seismic hydrocarbons detection and prediction of favorable targets in Cretaceous formations in southern parts of Xinhe area[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2017,24 (1): 58-63.
[19] 李曰俊,杨海军,张光亚,等. 重新划分塔里木盆地塔北隆起的次级构造单元[J].岩石学报,2012,28 (8): 2466-2477. LI Yuejun,YANG Haijun,ZHANG Guangya,et al. Redivision of the tectonic units of Tabei rise in Tarim Basin,NW China[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica,2012,28 (8): 2466-2477.
[20] 罗浩渝,陈军,章学岐,等. 河控浅水三角洲前缘沉积特征及对岩性油藏的控制: 以库车坳陷南斜坡巴西改组为例[J].岩性油气藏,2021,33 (5): 70-80. LUO Haoyu,CHEN Jun,ZHANG Xueqi,et al. Sedimentary characteristics of fluvial dominated shallow water delta front and its control on lithologic reservoir: A case study of Baxigai Formation in south slope of Kuqa Depression[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2021,33 (5): 70-80.
[21] 韩强,杨子川,李弘艳,等. 塔里木盆地沙雅隆起北部三道桥潜山结构与储层特征[J].地球科学与环境学报,2017,39 (1): 103-113. HAN Qiang,YANG Zichuan,LI Hongyan,et al. Characteristics of Sandaoqiao buried hill structure and reservoir in the northern Shaya uplift of Tarim Basin,China[J]. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2017,39 (1): 103-113.
[22] 夏辉,林畅松,刘永福,等. 塔里木盆地英买力地区白垩系舒善河组相对湖平面变化[J].天然气地球科学,2019,30 (11): 1579-1589. XIA Hui,LIN Changsong,LIU Yongfu,et al. A research on relative lacustrine level changes of Cretaceous Shushanhe Formation in the Yingmaili area of Tarim Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2019,30 (11): 1579-1589.
[23] 洪才均,康仁东,周芳芳,等. 新和-三道桥地区白垩系巴西改组沉积特征[J].新疆地质,2016,34 (2): 230-234. HONG Caijun,KANG Rendong,ZHOU Fangfang,et al. Sedimentary characteristics of Cretaceous Baxigai Formation in Xinhe Sandaoqiao area[J]. Xinjiang Geology,2016,34 (2): 230-234.
[24] 陈斐,魏登峰,余小雷,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地盐定地区三叠系延长组长2 油层组沉积相研究[J]. 岩性油气藏,2010,22 (1): 43-47. CHEN Fei,WEI Dengfeng,YU Xiaolei,et al. Sedimentary facies of Chang 2 oil-bearing member of Yanchang Formation in Yanchi-Dingbian area,Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2010,22 (1): 43-47.
[25] 王素英,张翔,田景春,等. 塔里木盆地顺北地区柯坪塔格组沉积演化及沉积分异模式[J].岩性油气藏,2021,33 (5): 81-94. WANG Suying,ZHANG Xiang,TIAN Jingchun,et al. Sedimentary evolution and sedimentary differentiation model of Kepingtage Formation in Shunbei area,Tarim Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2021,33 (5): 81-94.
[26] 刘磊,朱博华,刘显太,等. 中国滩坝砂勘探现状与储层基本特征分析[J].特种油气藏,2013,20 (5): 14-18. LIU Lei,ZHU Bohua,LIU Xiantai,et al. Exploration status and basic characteristics of beach-bar sand reservoirs in China[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2013,20 (5): 14-18.
[27] 苏洲,刘永福,韩剑发,等. 相控约束下的超深薄层砂体预测技术在塔北隆起玉东区块中的应用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2020,31 (2): 295-306. SU Zhou,LIU Yongfu,HAN Jianfa,et al. Application of ultradeep sandstone reservoirs prediction technology under seismic facies controlled in Yudong block of Tabei uplift,Tarim Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2020,31 (2): 295-306.
[28] 张汶,吕世聪,赵大林,等. 渤海湾盆地西南部古近系滩坝沉积特征及主控因素[J].岩性油气藏,2021,33 (3): 85-94. ZHANG Wen,LÜ Shicong,ZHAO Dalin,et al. Sedimentary characteristics and main controlling factors of Paleogene beach bar in southwestern Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021,33 (3): 85-94.
[29] 时瑞坤,高秋菊,韩小锋,等.车镇凹陷沙二段滩坝砂体沉积特征及控制因素[J].岩性油气藏,2018,30 (2): 50-57. SHI Ruikun,GAO Qiuju,HAN Xiaofeng,et al. Sedimentary characteristics and controlling factors of beach-bar sandbodies of the second member of Shahejie Formation in Chezhen Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2018,30 (2): 50-57.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

塔北新和地区下白垩统舒善河组薄砂体沉积相特征及沉积模式

Sedimentary facies characteristics and sedimentary model of thin sand bodies of Lower Cretaceous Shushanhe Formation in Xinhe area, northern Tarim Basin

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	李凌, 张照坤, 李明隆, 倪佳, 耿超, 唐思哲, 杨文杰, 谭秀成. 四川盆地威远—高石梯地区二叠系栖霞阶层序地层特征及有利储层分布[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 32-46.
[2]	刘永立, 李国蓉, 何钊, 田家奇, 李肖肖. 塔北地区寒武系层序地层格架与台缘带展布特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 80-91.
[3]	陈中红, 柴智. 原油混合后成熟度参数的差异性及其地质意义——以塔北隆起托甫台地区奥陶系为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(5): 38-49.
[4]	杨帆, 卞保力, 刘慧颖, 姚宗全, 尤新才, 刘海磊, 卫延召. 玛湖凹陷二叠系夏子街组限制性湖盆扇三角洲沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(5): 63-72.
[5]	田晓平, 张汶, 周连德, 沈孝秀, 郭维. 南堡凹陷二号断裂带古生界碳酸盐岩潜山岩溶模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(6): 93-101.
[6]	张汶, 吕世聪, 赵大林, 贾海松, 蔡越钎. 渤海湾盆地西南部古近系滩坝沉积特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 85-94.
[7]	黄华, 袁娟梅, 彭伟, 张亮, 文辉. 江汉盆地古近系潜江组盐湖沉积特征与成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 9-16.
[8]	张闻亭, 龙礼文, 肖文华, 魏浩元, 李铁锋, 董震宇. 酒泉盆地青西凹陷窟窿山构造带下沟组沉积特征及储层预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 186-197.
[9]	隋立伟. 塔南凹陷古地貌特征对沉积体系和油气分布的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4): 48-58.
[10]	何康, 张鹏志, 周军良, 甘立琴, 舒晓. 复合曲流带内部构型界面识别新方法及其应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4): 126-135.
[11]	张亚, 陈双玲, 张晓丽, 张玺华, 谢忱, 陈聪, 杨雨然, 高兆龙. 四川盆地茅口组岩溶古地貌刻画及油气勘探意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3): 44-55.
[12]	山鑫杰, 王飞宇, 刘念, 冯伟平, 江涛, 杜喜, 程志强, 李思嘉, 李月. 二连盆地呼仁布其凹陷南洼下白垩统烃源岩分布特征与油源分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3): 104-114.
[13]	刘为, 杨希冰, 张秀苹, 段亮, 邵远, 郝德峰. 莺歌海盆地东部黄流组重力流沉积特征及其控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(2): 75-82.
[14]	耿晓洁, 林畅松, 吴斌. 古地貌对塔中地区鹰山组岩溶结构及分布的控制作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(4): 46-55.
[15]	关新, 陈世加, 苏旺, 乐幸福, 张浩然. 四川盆地西北部栖霞组碳酸盐岩储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(2): 67-76.