岩性油气藏 ›› 2026, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (3): 79–93.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20260307

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

四川盆地西南部寒武系筇竹寺组页岩储层特征及成藏条件

郑马嘉1(), 刘勇2, 伍亚1, 陈俊宇1, 陈颖1, 钟梓月3, 詹淋3, 范存辉3   

  1. 1 中国石油西南油气田公司 开发事业部， 成都 610051
    2 中国石油西南油气田公司气田开发管理部， 成都 610056
    3 西南石油大学 地球科学与技术学院， 成都 610500
  • 收稿日期:2025-11-20 修回日期:2025-12-08 出版日期:2026-05-01 发布日期:2026-03-18
  • 第一作者:郑马嘉（1988—），男，博士，高级工程师，主要从事油气地质及开发工程管理与研究方面的工作。地址：（610051）四川省成都市锦江区下沙河铺街59号。Email:majiaz_cq@petrochina.com.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    中国石油天然气股份有限公司西南油气田公司科技项目“川南地区筇竹寺组深层页岩气‘双高’采集方法试验及处理解释技术研究”(2024D101-03-04)

Shale reservoir characteristics and hydrocarbon accumulation conditions of Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation in southwestern Sichuan Basin

ZHENG Majia1(), LIU Yong2, WU Ya1, CHEN Junyu1, CHEN Ying1, ZHONG Ziyue3, ZHAN Lin3, FAN Cunhui3   

  1. 1 Petroleum Development Division， PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gasfield Company， Chengdu 610051， China
    2 Field Development Management Department, PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gasfield Company, Chengdu 610056, China
    3 School of Geoscience and Technology, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
  • Received:2025-11-20 Revised:2025-12-08 Online:2026-05-01 Published:2026-03-18

RichHTML

0

PDF (PC)

20

摘要：

四川盆地西南部寒武系筇竹寺组页岩气勘探潜力大。基于测录井及地震资料，结合岩心薄片观察、物性测试、扫描电镜观察等实验手段，综合分析了其储层特征与成藏条件。研究结果表明：①四川盆地西南部筇竹寺组页岩可划分为黑色富有机质页岩与灰色粉砂质页岩；孔隙以无机孔（宏孔）为主，有机孔为辅，裂缝主要为被方解石、沥青等充填的高角度剪切缝及张性缝，并发育层间微裂缝及少量粒间缝；储层中脆性矿物含量高，质量分数为62.9%~86.5%，平均为72.0%；裂陷槽内储层质量优于槽外。②研究区“裂陷槽 + 古隆起”的古构造格局控制了储层的宏观展布，裂陷槽内深水陆棚相发育优质储层；槽内高TOC含量页岩与Ⅰ型干酪根为页岩气藏提供了气源；高孔、高脆性储层特征有利于气体赋存与储层改造；裂缝网络是气体运移与富集的关键渗流通道。③研究区筇竹寺组页岩气有利勘探区为槽-隆叠合区（Ⅰ类），储层厚度大，有机质丰度及热演化程度高，物性相对较好，含气丰度高，其次为叠合区外槽内区域（Ⅱ类）和叠合区外古隆起之上区域（Ⅲ类）。

关键词: 页岩气, 储层特征, 成藏条件, 槽-隆叠合区, 古隆起, 裂陷槽, 筇竹寺组, 寒武系, 资阳地区, 川西南

Abstract:

The shale gas of Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation in southwestern Sichuan Basin exhibits significant exploration potential. Based on well logging, master logging and seismic data, combined with experimental methods such as thin-section observation, physical property testing, and scanning electron microscopy, a comprehensive analysis was conducted on its reservoir characteristics and hydrocarbon accumulation conditions. The results show that: （1） The shale of Qiongzhusi Formation in southwestern Sichuan Basin can be classified into black organic-rich shale and gray silty shale. Pores are dominated by inorganic pores (macropores), supplemented by organic pores. Fractures are mainly high-angle shear fractures and tensile fractures filled with calcite and bitumen, along with developed bedding micro-fractures and minor intergranular fractures. The brittle mineral content in the reservoir is high, with mass fraction ranging from 62.9% to 86.5%, averaging 72.0%. The reservoir quality within the rift trough is superior to that outside the trough. （2） The paleotectonic sedimentary framework of“rift trough and paleouplift” in the study area controls the macroscopic distribution of the reservoir. High-quality reservoirs developed in the deep-water shelf facies within the rift trough. Shale with high TOC content and Type-I kerogen in the trough provide gas sources for shale gas reservoirs. High porosity and high brittleness are conducive to gas storage and reservoir transformation. Fracture networks serve as key seepage pathways for gas migration and enrichment. （3） Favorable exploration targets for shale gas in Qiongzhusi Formation of the study area are overlaped zones of trough and uplift (Class I), with large reservoir thickness, high abundance and thermal evolution degree organic matter, relatively good physical properties, and high gas abundance. Followed by areas within the trough outside the overlaped zone (Class Ⅱ), and areas over the paleo-uplift outside the overlaped zone (Class Ⅲ).

Key words: shale gas, reservoir characteristics, accumulation condition, overlaped zone of trough and uplift, paleouplift, rift trough, Qiongzhusi Formation, Cambrian, Ziyang area, southwestern Sichuan Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122

图1

四川盆地及周缘寒武系筇竹寺组构造背景-沉积格局概况及岩性地层综合柱状图（据文献[13]修改） 注：A.亚马逊；AN.阿拉伯—努比亚；B.波罗的海；C.刚果；EA.南极洲东部；G.格陵兰；I.印度；K.卡拉哈里；L.劳伦大陆；NA.澳大利亚北部；NC.中国北部；R.里奥普拉塔; SC.中国南部；SA.澳大利亚南部；Si.西伯利亚；T.塔里木；WA.非洲西部。"

图2

四川盆地西南部寒武系筇竹寺组富有机质页岩和粉砂质页岩岩心及显微照片 （a） 黑色富有机质页岩，Z201井，4 602.13~4 602.17 m，槽内；（b） 灰黑色页岩，W201井，2 675.79~2 675.89 m，斜坡；（c） 粉砂岩，Z217井，4 407.49~4 407.56 m，斜坡；（d） 粉砂岩，Z217井，4 407.49~4 407.56 m，斜坡，单偏光；（e） 黑色页岩与砂质页岩，砂质页岩内见大量侵染状黄铁矿，Z217井，4 404.43~4 404.61 m，斜坡；（f） 砂质页岩，Z217井，4 416.56~4 416.63 m，斜坡；（g） 黄铁矿条带富有机质硅质页岩，Z201井，4 793.33~4 793.38 m，槽内，单偏光；（h） 含钙粉砂质页岩，微量有机质浸染，Z201井，4 451.74~4 451.79 m，槽内，单偏光；（i） 粉砂质页岩，Z201井，4 471.09~4 471.14 m，槽内，单偏光；（j） 富有机质硅页岩，有机质浸染不甚均匀，Z201井，4 851.92~4 851.97 m，槽内，单偏光；（k） 富有机质粉砂质页岩，有机质浸染状，WY1H井，4 230.18~4 230.21 m，斜坡，单偏光。"

图3

四川盆地西南部寒武系筇竹寺组页岩储层储集空间类型 （a） 长石溶蚀孔和有机孔发育，Z201井，⑤小层，4 605.00 m；（b） 长石溶蚀孔发育，Z201井，⑤小层，4 624.00 m；（c） 有机孔发育，Z203井，③小层，3 432.00 m；（d） 有机孔发育，WY1H井，⑤小层，4 330.00 m；（e） 有机孔发育，Z217井，⑤小层，4 378.00 m；（f） 黏土矿物晶间孔发育，Z201井，⑦小层，4 476.00 m；（g） 有机孔和黏土矿物晶间孔发育，Z202井，⑥小层，4 932.50 m；（h） 有机孔和粒间孔发育，Z201井，⑥小层，4 556.00 m；（i） 粒缘缝和粒间孔发育，WY1H井，⑥小层，4 309.20 m。"

图4

四川盆地西南部寒武系筇竹寺组不同页岩储层面孔率占比 注：参与统计的各类孔隙的孔径 > 9.8 nm。"

图5

四川盆地西南部寒武系筇竹寺组页岩储层裂缝发育特征 （a） 直立剪切缝，方解石全充填，Z201井，④小层，4 493.39~4 493.60 m；（b） 直立张性缝，方解石全充填，Z217井，⑦小层，4 278.32~4 278.46 m；（c） 异常高压缝，方解石或脆性矿物全充填，W218井，③小层，4 936.75~4 936.88 m；（d） 角度剪切缝，方解石全充填，Z203井，⑥小层，3 241.59~3 241.78 m；（e） 层理缝，Z201井，①小层，4 862.43~4 862.55 m；（f） 高角度剪切缝，方解石全充填，Z203井，⑤小层，3 311.71~3 312.49 m；（g） 张性缝，方解石全充填，Z203井，③小层，3 440.40~3 440.60 m；（h） 层理缝，可见滑动擦痕，WY1H井，③小层，4 330.28~4 330.60 m；（i） 层间微裂缝，粉砂质页岩，未充填，Z201井，③小层，4 574.63 m；（j） 层间微裂缝，粉砂质页岩，未充填，WY1H井，④小层，4 294.19~4 294.24 m；（k） 粒缘（间）缝，未充填，Z218井，⑥小层，3 313.29 m；（l） 粒内缝，Z203井，③小层，3 441.20 m。"

图6

四川盆地西南部寒武系筇竹寺组页岩储层裂缝参数统计"

图7

四川盆地西南部不同构造位置寒武系筇竹寺组岩心裂缝密度连井剖面 注：导航图为研究区筇竹寺组地层厚度分布图。"

图8

四川盆地西南部寒武系筇竹寺组不同区域及不同小层页岩孔隙度及脆性矿物含量对比"

图9

四川盆地西南部寒武系筇竹寺组不同区域及不同小层页岩含气量对比"

图10

四川盆地西南部寒武系筇竹寺组断裂平面分布特征"

图11

四川盆地西南部寒武系筇竹寺组页岩TOC含量分布柱状图"

图12

四川盆地西南部寒武系筇竹寺组孔隙度与有机质、矿物含量相关性"

图13

四川盆地西南部寒武系筇竹寺组（a）与志留系龙马溪组（b）页岩气富集模式对比（据文献[38]修改）"

表1

四川盆地西南部寒武系筇竹寺组有利勘探区参数统计"

有利区
类型		 区域位置 划分标准 面积/
km2
储层
厚度/m		 TOC/% Ro/% 孔隙度/% v(含气）/（m3·t-1） 压力
系数		 裂缝发育
情况		 埋深/m w（脆性
矿物）/%
Ⅰ类 槽-隆叠合区 > 30 > 4.0 2.0~3.5 > 6.00 > 4.0 > 1.60 距裂缝发育区较远，
仅发育少量微裂缝
和宏观裂缝		 4 500~
5 500		 > 40.0 4 090
Ⅱ类 裂陷槽内部（叠合区外） 10~30 2.0~4.0 1.6~2.0 4.00~6.00 2.0~4.0 1.15~1.60 距裂缝发育区相对较远，发育少量宏观裂缝 3 500~
4 500		 30.0~40.0 2 700
Ⅲ类 古隆起之上（叠合区外） 5~10 1.0~2.0 1.0~1.6 3.00~4.00 1.0~2.0 0.95~1.15 距裂缝发育区较近，
发育大量宏观裂缝		 < 3 500 25.0~30.0 1 910

图14

四川盆地西南部寒武系筇竹寺组勘探有利区优选"

[1] 邹才能, 董大忠, 王社教, 等. 中国页岩气形成机理、地质特征及资源潜力[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2010, 37(6):641-653.
ZOU Caineng, DONG Dazhong, WANG Shejiao, et al. Geological characteristics,formation mechanism and resource potential of shale gas in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2010, 37(6):641-653.
doi: 10.1016/S1876-3804(11)60001-3
[2] 郭旭升, 胡东风, 文治东, 等. 四川盆地及周缘下古生界海相页岩气富集高产主控因素:以焦石坝地区五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J]. 中国地质, 2014, 41(3):893-901.
GUO Xusheng, HU Dongfeng, WEN Zhidong, et al. Major factors controlling the accumulation and high productivity in marine shale gas in the Lower Paleozoic of Sichuan Basin and its periphery:A case study of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in Jiaoshiba area[J]. Geology in China, 2014, 41(3):893-901.
[3] 熊亮, 钟怡江, 董翼昕, 等. 川南下寒武统筇竹寺组沉积格局及沉积体系[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 46(6):15-31.
doi: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2024.11.16.15
XIONG Liang, ZHONG Yijiang, DONG Yixin, et al. Sedimentary patterns and depositional systems of the Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation in the Southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2024, 46(6):15-31.
[4] 王濡岳, 胡宗全, 包汉勇, 等. 四川盆地上奥陶统五峰组—下志留统龙马溪组页岩关键矿物成岩演化及其控储作用[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(6):996-1005.
WANG Ruyue, HU Zongquan, BAO Hanyong, et al. Diagenetic evolution of key minerals and its controls on reservoir quality of Upper Ordovician Wufeng-Lower Silurian Longmaxi shale of Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(6):996-1005.
[5] 王濡岳, 胡宗全, 龙胜祥, 等. 四川盆地上奥陶统五峰组—下志留统龙马溪组页岩储层特征与演化机制[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(2):353-364.
WANG Ruyue, HU Zongquan, LONG Shengxiang, et al. Reservoir characteristics and evolution mechanisms of the Upper Ordovician Wufeng-Lower Silurian Longmaxi shale,Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(2):353-364.
[6] 杨杨, 王海青, 石学文, 等. 基于FMI图像微电导率曲线时频信息识别页岩层理构造的方法及应用:以四川盆地资中地区寒武系筇竹寺组一段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(6):59-70.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20250606
YANG Yang, WANG Haiqing, SHI Xuewen, et al. A method and application of identifying shale bedding structures based on FMI image micro-electrical conductivity curve time-frequency information:A case study on the first member of Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation in Zizhong area of Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2025, 37(6):59-70.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20250606
[7] 何骁, 梁峰, 李海, 等. 四川盆地下寒武统筇竹寺组海相页岩气高产井突破与富集模式[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2024, 29(1):142-155.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2024.01.011
HE Xiao, LIANG Feng, LI Hai, et al. Breakthrough and enrichment mode of marine shale gas in the Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation in high-yield wells in Sichuan Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2024, 29(1):142-155.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2024.01.011
[8] 雍锐, 石学文, 罗超, 等. 四川盆地寒武系筇竹寺组页岩气“槽-隆”富集规律及勘探前景[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2024, 51(6):1211-1226.
doi: 10.11698/PED.20230616
YONG Rui, SHI Xuewen, LUO Chao, et al. Aulacogen-uplift enrichment pattern and exploration prospect of Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation shale gas in Sichuan Basin,SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2024, 51(6):1211-1226.
[9] 郭彤楼. 中国页岩气发展的回顾与思考:从志留系到寒武系[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2025, 15(3):339-348.
GUO Tonglou. Review and reflection on shale gas development in China:From Silurian to Cambrian[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2025, 15(3):339-348.
[10] 罗冰, 周刚, 马奎, 等. 四川盆地德阳—安岳裂陷西侧震旦系灯四段储层特征及成藏主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(5):49-58.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20250505
LUO Bing, ZHOU Gang, MA Kui, et al. Reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors for hydrocarbon accumulation of the fourth member of Sinian Dengying Formation in the west side of Deyang-Anyue Rift,Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2025, 37(5):49-58.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20250505
[11] 杨雨然, 石学文, 李彦佑, 等. 四川盆地德阳—安岳裂陷槽筇竹寺组古地貌、沉积模式与勘探方向[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2024, 29(6):67-81.
YANG Yuran, SHI Xuewen, LI Yanyou, et al. Paleogeomorphology,sedimentary pattern and exploration orientation of Qiongzhusi Formation in Deyang-Anyue Rift Trough,Sichuan Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2024, 29(6):67-81.
[12] 王振, 王兴志, 朱逸青, 等. 四川盆地德阳—安岳裂陷槽寒武系筇竹寺组地层划分及勘探意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(5):97-110.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20250509
WANG Zhen, WANG Xingzhi, ZHU Yiqing, et al. Stratigraphy subdivision and exploration implications of Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation in Deyang-Anyue aulacogen,Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2025, 37(5):97-110.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20250509
[13] LI Zhengxiang, EVANS D A D, HALVERSON G P. Neoproterozoic glaciations in a revised global palaeogeography from the breakup of Rodinia to the assembly of Gondwanaland[J]. Sedimentary Geology, 2013, 294:219-232.
doi: 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2013.05.016
[14] 谢国梁, 焦堃, 刘瑞崟, 等. 四川盆地及周缘筇竹寺组与五峰组—龙马溪组页岩孔隙结构对比[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 51(5):813-832.
XIE Guoliang, JIAO Kun, LIU Ruiyin, et al. Comparison of pore structures between Qiongzhusi Formation and Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science＆Technology Edition), 2024, 51(5):813-832.
[15] 何登发. 中国多旋回叠合沉积盆地的形成演化、地质结构与油气分布规律[J]. 地学前缘, 2022, 29(6):24-59.
doi: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2022.8.1
HE Dengfa. Multi-cycle superimposed sedimentary basins in China:Formation,evolution,geologic framework and hydrocarbon occurrence[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2022, 29(6):24-59.
doi: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2022.8.1
[16] 何骁, 郑马嘉, 刘勇, 等. 四川盆地“槽-隆”控制下的寒武系筇竹寺组页岩储层特征及其差异性成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2):420-439.
HE Xiao, ZHENG Majia, LIU Yong, et al. Characteristics and differential origin of Qiongzhusi Formation shale reservoirs under the “aulacogen-uplift” tectonic setting,Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(2):420-439.
[17] 蒋代琴, 李平平, 邹华耀. 川东北元坝地区侏罗系陆相页岩天然裂缝发育特征及其对页岩油气富集和保存的影响[J]. 现代地质, 2024, 38(2):362-372.
JIANG Daiqin, LI Pingping, ZOU Huayao. Characteristics of natural fractures and their influence on oil and gas enrichment and preservation of the Jurassic continental shale in the Yuanba area,northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Geoscience, 2024, 38(2):362-372.
[18] 李启晖, 任大忠, 甯波, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地神木地区侏罗系延安组煤层微观孔隙结构特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2):76-88.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20240208
LI Qihui, REN Dazhong, NING Bo, et al. Micro-pore structure characteristics of coal seams of Jurassic Yan’an Formation in Shenmu area,Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(2):76-88.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20240208
[19] 卫欢, 单长安, 朱松柏, 等. 库车坳陷克深地区白垩系巴什基奇克组致密砂岩裂缝发育特征及地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(1):149-160.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20250113
WEI Huan, SHAN Changan, ZHU Songbai, et al. Fracture development characteristics and geological significance of tight sandstone of Cretaceous Bashijiqike Formation in Keshen area,Kuqa Depression[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2025, 37(1):149-160.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20250113
[20] 郭彤楼, 邓虎成, 赵爽, 等. 四川盆地寒武系筇竹寺组新类型页岩气形成机理与勘探突破[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2025, 52(1):57-69.
doi: 10.11698/PED.20240478
GUO Tonglou, DENG Hucheng, ZHAO Shuang, et al. Formation mechanisms and exploration breakthroughs of new type of shale gas in Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation,Sichuan Basin,SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2025, 52(1):57-69.
[21] 詹淋, 范存辉, 唐雯, 等. 四川盆地东部南雅地区二叠系吴家坪组构造特征及其控藏机制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(5):133-144.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20250512
ZHAN Lin, FAN Cunhui, TANG Wen, et al. Structural characteristics of Permian Wujiaping Formation,Nanya area,eastern Sichuan Basin and their hydrocarbon reservoir control mechanism[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2025, 37(5):133-144.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20250512
[22] LOUCKS R G, RUPPEL S C. Mississippian Barnett shale:Lithofacies and depositional setting of a deep-water shale-gas succession in the Fort Worth Basin,Texas[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2007, 91(4):579-601.
doi: 10.1306/11020606059
[23] 杨丽亚, 沈均均, 陈孔全, 等. 基于矿物岩石学和地球化学分析的页岩古环境演化与有机质富集关系:以川西地区下寒武统筇竹寺组为例[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 2022, 46(5):40-54.
YANG Liya, SHEN Junjun, CHEN Kongquan, et al. Relationship between paleoenvironmental evolution and organic matter enrichment of shale of the Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation in Western Sichuan:Evidence from mineral petrology and geochemistry[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2022, 46(5):40-54.
[24] 张明何, 魏祥峰, 高波, 等. 川北山前带寒武系筇竹寺组富有机质页岩发育模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(4):992-1006.
ZHANG Minghe, WEI Xiangfeng, GAO Bo, et al. Developmental models of organic-rich shales in the Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation in the piedmont zone of northern Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(4):992-1006.
[25] 闵华军. 扬子板块西南缘下寒武统筇竹寺组高过成熟页岩储层特征及形成机理[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2020.
MIN Huajun. Characteristics and formation mechanism of highly over-mature shale gas reservoirs in Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation in the southwestern Yangtze plate[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2020.
[26] 王亮, 苏树特, 马梓柯, 等. 川中地区寒武系沧浪铺组沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6):19-31.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20220602
WANG Liang, SU Shute, MA Zike, et al. Sedimentary characteristics of Cambrian Canglangpu Formation in central Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(6):19-31.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20220602
[27] 陈威振, 田景春, 林小兵, 等. 川西南下寒武统麦地坪组—筇竹寺组元素地球化学特征及其古环境意义:以JS1井为例[J]. 沉积学报, 2024, 42(5):1784-1798.
CHEN Weizhen, TIAN Jingchun, LIN Xiaobing, et al. Geochemical characteristics and paleoenvironmental significance of Lower Cambrian Maidiping and Qiongzhusi Formations in southwestern Sichuan Basin:A case study of well JS1[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2024, 42(5):1784-1798.
[28] 闵华军, 张廷山, 李季林, 等. 黑色页岩中微纳米石英成因及其沉积环境指示意义:以上扬子西南缘筇竹寺组黑色页岩为例[J]. 沉积学报, 2025, 43(1):335-348.
MIN Huajun, ZHANG Tingshan, LI Jilin, et al. Origin of micro-nano quartz in black shale and its implication for sedimentary environment:A case study of the Qiongzhusi Formation in the southwest Upper Yangtze Platform[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2025, 43(1):335-348.
[29] WEI Wei, DONG Linhui, XIAO Shuhai, et al. Seawater barium and sulfide removal improved marine habitability for the Cambrian Explosion of early animals[J]. National Science Review, 2024, 11(8):1-10.
[30] 罗冰, 文华国, 廖义沙, 等. 川东北地区二叠系吴家坪组二段页岩储层特征及有利区分布[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(1):1-12.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20250101
LUO Bing, WEN Huaguo, LIAO Yisha, et al. Shale reservoirs characteristics and favorable areas distribution of the second member of Permian Wujiaping Formation in northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic reservoirs, 2025, 37(1):1-12.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20250101
[31] 秦建中, 陶国亮, 腾格尔, 等. 南方海相优质页岩的成烃生物研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2010, 32(3):262-269.
QIN Jianzhong, TAO Guoliang, TENGER, et al. Hydrocarbon-forming organisms in excellent marine source rocks in South China[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2010, 32(3):262-269.
[32] 王濡岳, 胡宗全, 赖富强, 等. 川东北地区下侏罗统自流井组大安寨段陆相页岩脆性特征及其控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(2):366-378.
WANG Ruyue, HU Zongquan, LAI Fuqiang, et al. Brittleness features and controlling factors of continental shale from Da’anzhai Member of the Lower Jurassic Ziliujing Formation,northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(2):366-378.
[33] 雍锐, 吴建发, 刘勇, 等. 多期次构造运动背景下深层页岩天然裂缝发育特征及其油气地质意义:以四川盆地资阳地区下寒武统筇竹寺组页岩为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2025, 45(5):1-16.
YONG Rui, WU Jianfa, LIU Yong, et al. Development characteristics of natural fractures in deep shale in the context of multiphase tectonic movement and their petroleum geological implications:A case study on the Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation shale in the Ziyang Area of the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2025, 45(5):1-16.
[34] FAN Cunhui, NIE Shan, LI Hu, et al. Quantitative prediction and spatial analysis of structural fractures in deep shale gas re-servoirs within complex structural zones:A case study of the Longmaxi Formation in the Luzhou area,southern Sichuan Basin,China[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2024, 263:106025.
doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2024.106025
[35] FAN Cunhui, LI Hu, ZHAO Shengxian, et al. Formation stages and evolution patterns of structural fractures in marine shale:Case study of the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in the Changning area of the southern Sichuan Basin,China[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2020, 34(8):9524-9539.
doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c01748
[36] 曾韬, 凡睿, 夏文谦, 等. 四川盆地东部走滑断裂识别与特征分析及形成演化:以涪陵地区为例[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(3):366-385.
doi: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2022.12.58
ZENG Tao, FAN Rui, XIA Wenqian, et al. Formation and evolution of strike-slip fault zones in the eastern Sichuan Basin and identification and characterization of the fault zones:A case study of the Fuling area[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2023, 30(3):366-385.
doi: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2022.12.58
[37] 蒋珊, 王玉满, 王书彦, 等. 四川盆地川中古隆起及周缘下寒武统筇竹寺组页岩有机质石墨化区预测[J]. 天然气工业, 2018, 38(10):19-27.
JIANG Shan, WANG Yuman, WANG Shuyan, et al. Distribution prediction of graphitized organic matter areas in the Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi shale in the Central Sichuan paleo-uplift and its surrounding areas in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2018, 38(10):19-27.
[38] 郑马嘉, 吴洪波, 赵萌, 等. 四川盆地筇竹寺组与龙马溪组页岩气地质条件及富集模式[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 2025, 49(5):45-60.
ZHENG Majia, WU Hongbo, ZHAO Meng, et al. Comparative study on geological conditions and models of shale gas enrichment in Qiongzhusi Formation and Longmaxi Formation in Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2025, 49(5):45-60.
[39] 周文, 徐浩, 余谦, 等. 四川盆地及其周缘五峰组—龙马溪组与筇竹寺组页岩含气性差异及成因[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(5):18-25.
ZHOU Wen, XU Hao, YU Qian, et al. Shale gas-bearing pro-perty differences and their genesis between Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation and Qiongzhusi Formation in Sichuan Basin and surrounding areas[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(5):18-25.
[1] 苟哲培, 魏倩倩, 严雪齐, 隆辉, 卢嘉勋, 高儇博, 唐银海, 谭先锋. 四川盆地威远地区奥陶系天然气地球化学特征及富集规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2026, 38(3): 120-131.
[2] 曹立斌, 郑马嘉, 陈倩, 伍亚, 程利敏. 基于GPU加速的SSA三维微地震实时定位方法及应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2026, 38(3): 132-140.
[3] 白益远, 弓虎军, 王东旭, 李渊, 罗芬红, 王军军. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长探区氦气分布特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2026, 38(3): 149-161.
[4] 蒋龙, 程紫燕, 孙红霞, 刘祖鹏, 李忠新, 田选华, 彭琳雄, 朱丽. 渤海湾盆地渤南洼陷古近系沙三下亚段页岩储层特征及可动孔喉下限[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2026, 38(3): 54-66.
[5] 刘若彤, 张大智, 隋立伟, 肖利梅, 田亚, 孙山, 彭丹丹, 李建智. 川中合川地区志留系龙马溪组页岩岩相测井智能识别方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2026, 38(3): 94-106.
[6] 顾雯, 陈辉, 朱亚东, 巫芙蓉, 赵洲, 王书言, 王尉. 四川盆地蜀南地区三叠系嘉二段成藏主控因素及勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2026, 38(2): 56-64.
[7] 肖富强, 肖卫东, 姜智东, 高磊, 赵正威, 潘晓飞, 陈富贵, 邹勇军. 下扬子地区萍乐坳陷二叠系乐平组煤系页岩储层特征及勘探潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2026, 38(1): 100-114.
[8] 李勇, 张亚, 周刚, 屈海洲, 龙虹宇, 李成龙, 张驰, 陈迪. 四川盆地蓬莱气田寒武系龙王庙组优质储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(6): 35-47.
[9] 杨杨, 王海青, 石学文, 曾玉婷, 高翔, 李金勇, 张轩昂, 闫建平. 基于FMI图像微电导率曲线时频信息识别页岩层理构造的方法及应用——以四川盆地资中地区寒武系筇竹寺组一段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(6): 59-70.
[10] 陆江, 王健, 吴楠, 李程善, 冯子飞. 鄂尔多斯盆地西缘奥陶系乌拉力克组页岩气勘探潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(5): 34-48.
[11] 罗冰, 周刚, 马奎, 王文之, 徐少立, 武鲁亚, 王玥蕴, 张新. 四川盆地德阳—安岳裂陷西侧震旦系灯四段储层特征及成藏主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(5): 49-58.
[12] 王振, 王兴志, 朱逸青, 杨雨然, 杨一茗, 康家豪, 黄柏文, 吕豪. 四川盆地德阳—安岳裂陷槽寒武系筇竹寺组地层划分及勘探意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(5): 97-110.
[13] 詹淋, 范存辉, 唐雯, 杨西燕, 刘冬玺, 李博, 杨昕睿. 四川盆地东部南雅地区二叠系吴家坪组构造特征及其控藏机制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(5): 133-144.
[14] 邢倩, 李杨凡, 李翔, 万子千, 李雅兰. 川北米仓山地区寒武系仙女洞组碳酸盐岩储集特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(4): 50-62.
[15] 杨雪, 杨雨然, 张景缘, 田鹤, 王青, 宋芳, 张赛柯, 陈瑶. 川北地区开江—梁平海槽二叠系海相页岩特征及优质储层形成机制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(3): 108-119.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发