岩性油气藏 ›› 2015, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (3): 26–31.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2015.03.004

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

柴达木盆地柴西地区古近系—新近系致密油勘探潜力分析

万传治1,王 鹏2,薛建勤2,苏雪迎3,周 刚2,苟迎春1   

  1.  1. 中国石油勘探开发研究院 西北分院,兰州 730020 ; 2. 中国石油青海油田分公司 勘探开发研究院,甘肃 敦煌 736202 ; 3. 中国石油大学(北京) 地球科学学院,北京 102200 )
  • 出版日期:2015-05-26 发布日期:2015-05-26
  • 作者简介:万传治( 1980- ),男,高级工程师,主要从事石油天然气地质综合研究方面的工作。 地址:( 730020 )甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路 535号。 E-mail : wan_cz@petrochina.com.cn 。
  • 基金资助:

    中国石油重大科技专项“柴达木盆地石油勘探领域评价与目标优选”(编号: 2011E-0301 )资助

Exploration potential of tight oil of the Paleogene and Neogene in western Qaidam Basin

WAN Chuanzhi1, WANG Peng2, XUE Jianqin2, SU Xueying3, ZHOU Gang2, GOU Yingchun1   

  1.  1. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development-Northwest , Lanzhou 730020 , China ; 2. Research Institute of Exploration and Development , PetroChina Qinghai Oilfield Company , Dunhuang 736202 , Gansu , China ;3. College of Geosciences , China University of Petroleum ( Beijing ), Beijing 102200 , China
  • Online:2015-05-26 Published:2015-05-26

摘要:

柴达木盆地柴西地区古近系下干柴沟组与新近系上干柴沟组地层均具备致密油形成的基本地质条件。 柴西地区下干柴沟组上段有效烃源岩有机碳质量分数为 0.8%~2.0%,有机质类型以Ⅰ—Ⅱ1 型为主;上干柴沟组有效烃源岩有机碳质量分数为 0.6%~1.5%,有机质类型以Ⅰ—Ⅱ1 型为主。 热模拟实验表明,柴西地区古近系—新近系在烃源岩镜质体反射率(Ro)为 0.47%~1.30%时为主要生油阶段,Ro 为 0.75% 时达到最大液态烃产率,具有烃源岩在低成熟阶段即可大量生烃并迅速排烃的特点。沉积相研究认为,古近系下干柴沟组和新近系上干柴沟组广泛发育的半深湖—深湖相烃源岩和与其互层沉积的滨浅湖相砂体或碳酸盐岩,构成了对致密油形成非常有利的源储共生关系,而古构造斜坡区和生油凹陷中心是致密油富集分布区。优选柴西地区新近系扎哈泉凹陷—乌南斜坡区上干柴沟组、南翼山—小梁山区带上干柴沟组—下油砂山组、七个泉—跃进斜坡区下干柴沟组上段为致密油三大有利勘探区带。

关键词: 致密油, 资源潜力, 古近系, 新近系, 柴达木盆地

Abstract:

The Paleogene Lower Ganchaigou Formation and Neogene Upper Ganchaigou Formation in the western Qaidam Basin have the basic geological conditions to form tight oil. The organic carbon content of effective hydrocarbon source rocks in the upper segment of Lower Ganchaigou Formation is between 0.8% and 2.0%, and the type of organic matter is mainly Ⅰ-Ⅱ1. The organic carbon content of effective hydrocarbon source rocks in Upper Ganchaigou Formation is between 0.6% and 1.5%, and the type of organic matter is mainly Ⅰ-Ⅱ1. Thermal simulation experiment shows that it is in the main stage of hydrocarbon generation of Paleogene-Neogene in western Qaidam Basin when the Ro of source rocks is between 0.47% and 1.30%, and liquid hydrocarbon yield reaches maximum when Ro is 0.746%. Sedimentary facies study indicates that extensively developed semi deep-deep lake facies source rocks of the Paleogene Lower Ganchaigou Formation and Neogene Upper Ganchaigou Formation has source-reservoir symbiotic relation with shore shallow lake facies sand bodies or carbonate rocks, which is beneficial to form tight oil, and ramp area of paleostructure and the center of source sag are favorable for tight oil enrichment. The Neogene Upper Ganchaigou Formation in Zhahaquan Sag-Wunan ramp area, Upper Ganchaigou Formation and Lower Youshashan Formation in NanyishanXiaoliangshanarea and the upper segment of Lower Ganchaigou Formation in Qigequan-Yuejin ramp area are the three favorable exploration zones for tight oil.

Key words: tight oil, resources potential, Paleogene, Neogene, western Qaidam Basin

[1]赵政璋,杜金虎,邹才能,等.非常规油气资源现实的勘探开发领域———致密油气[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2012.

Zhao Zhengzhang,Du Jinhu,Zou Caineng,et al. Unconventional oil and gas resources reality of exploration and development fields— The density of oil and gas[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2012.

[2]付锁堂,张道伟,薛建勤,等.柴达木盆地致密油形成的地质条件及勘探潜力分析[J].沉积学报,2013,31(4):672-680.

Fu Suotang,Zhang Daowei,Xue Jianqin,et al. Exploration potential and geological conditions of tight oil in the Qaidam Basin[J]. Acta sedimentologica sinica,2013,31(4):672-682.

[3]邹才能,陶士振,侯连华,等.非常规油气地质[M].北京:地质出版社,2011:1-310.

Zou Caineng,Tao Shizhen,Hou lianhua,et al. Unconventional petroleum geology[M]. Beijing:Geology Press,2011:1-310.

[4] 关德师,牛嘉玉,郭丽娜,等.中国非常规油气地质[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1995.

Guan Deshi,Niu Jiayu,Guo li’na et al. Unconventional oil and gas geology in China[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1995.

[5] 邹才能,董大忠,王社教,等.中国页岩气形成机理、地质特征及资源潜力[J].石油勘探与开发,2010,37(6):641-653.

Zou Caineng,Dong Dazhng,Wang Shejia,et al. Geological characteristics,formation mechanism and resource potential of sheale gas in Chian[J]. Petoleum Exploration and Development,2010,37(6): 641-653.

[6] 马达德,寿建峰,胡勇,等.柴达木盆地柴西南区碎屑岩储层形成的主控因素分析[J].沉积学报,2005,23(4):589-595.

Ma Dade,Shou Jianfeng,Hu Yong,et al. Analysis of the main controlling factors on the formation of clastic reservoirs in the southwestern area of the Qaidam Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2005, 23(4):589-595.

[7] 杨超,陈清华,任来义,等.柴达木盆地构造单元划分[J].西南石油大学学报:自然科学版,2012,34(1):25-33.

Yang Chao,Chen Qinghua,Ren Laiyi,et al. Tectonic units of the Qaidam Basin[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University:Science & Technology Edition,2012,34(1):25-33.

[8] 林承焰,刘伟,刘键,等.柴达木盆地油泉子油田中孔低渗型藻灰岩储层测井评价[J].西安石油大学学报:自然科学版,2009,24(1):25-28.Lin Chengyan,Liu Wei,Liu Jian,et al. Well logging evaluation of the algal limestone reservoirs with middle-porosity and low-permeability in Youquanzi Oilfield of Qaidam Basin [J]. Journal of Xi’an Petroleum University:Natural Science Edition,2009,24(1): 25-28.

[9] 党玉琪,熊继辉,刘震,等.柴达木盆地油气成藏的主控因素[J].石油与天然气地质,2004,25(6):614-619.

Dang Yuqi,Xiong Jihui,Liu Zhen,et al. Main factors controlling hydrocarbon accumulation in Qaidam basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2004,25(6):614-619.

[10] 陈子炓,寿建峰,斯春松,等.柴达木盆地花土沟油区上干柴沟组—下油砂山组碳酸盐岩储层特征[J].成都理工学院学报,2001,28(1):53-58.

Chen Ziliao,Shou Jianfeng,Si Chunsong,et al. Carbonates reservoir features of Shangganchaigou to Xiayoushashan Formation in Huatugou area,Qaidam Basin[J]. Journal of Chengdu Institute of Technology, 2001,28(1):53-58.

[11] 陈启林.大型咸化湖盆地层岩性油气藏有利条件与勘探方向———以柴达木盆地柴西南古近纪为例[J].岩性油气藏,2007,19(1):46-51.

Chen Qilin. Favorable condition and exploration prospecting of lithologic hydrocarbon reservoir in large-scale saline basin Case study on the Eogene in the southwest of Qaidam Basin[J]. Lithologic reservoirs,2007,19(1):46-51.

[1] 杨丽莎, 陈彬滔, 马轮, 史忠生, 薛罗, 王磊, 史江龙, 赵艳军. 陆相湖盆坳陷期源—汇系统的要素特征及耦合关系——以南苏丹Melut盆地北部坳陷新近系Jimidi组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 27-38.
[2] 李翔, 王建功, 李飞, 王玉林, 伍坤宇, 李亚锋, 李显明. 柴达木盆地西部始新统湖相微生物岩沉积特征——以西岔沟和梁东地区下干柴沟组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 63-73.
[3] 冯德浩, 刘成林, 田继先, 太万雪, 李培, 曾旭, 卢振东, 郭轩豪. 柴达木盆地一里坪地区新近系盆地模拟及有利区预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 74-84.
[4] 张汶, 吕世聪, 赵大林, 贾海松, 蔡越钎. 渤海湾盆地西南部古近系滩坝沉积特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 85-94.
[5] 黄华, 袁娟梅, 彭伟, 张亮, 文辉. 江汉盆地古近系潜江组盐湖沉积特征与成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 9-16.
[6] 向巧维, 李小平, 丁琳, 杜家元. 珠江口盆地珠一坳陷古近系高自然伽马砂岩形成机制及油气地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 93-103.
[7] 王付勇, 杨坤. 致密油藏孔喉分布特征对渗吸驱油规律的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 155-162.
[8] 龙国徽, 王艳清, 朱超, 夏志远, 赵健, 唐鹏程, 房永生, 李海鹏, 张娜, 刘健. 柴达木盆地英雄岭构造带油气成藏条件与有利勘探区带[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 145-160.
[9] 田光荣, 王建功, 孙秀建, 李红哲, 杨魏, 白亚东, 裴明利, 周飞, 司丹. 柴达木盆地阿尔金山前带侏罗系含油气系统成藏差异性及其主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 131-144.
[10] 孔红喜, 王远飞, 周飞, 朱军, 陈阳阳, 宋德康. 鄂博梁构造带油气成藏条件分析及勘探启示[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 175-185.
[11] 曹思佳, 孙增玖, 党虎强, 曹帅, 刘冬民, 胡少华. 致密油薄砂体储层预测技术及应用实效——以松辽盆地敖南区块下白垩统泉头组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 239-247.
[12] 冯越, 黄志龙, 李天军, 张华, 李宏伟, 周亚东. 吐哈盆地胜北洼陷七克台组二段致密油成藏条件[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 97-108.
[13] 王航, 杨海风, 黄振, 白冰, 高雁飞. 基于可容纳空间变化的河流相演化新模式及其控藏作用——以莱州湾凹陷垦利A构造为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5): 73-83.
[14] 田继先, 赵健, 张静, 孔骅, 房永生, 曾旭, 沙威, 王牧. 柴达木盆地英雄岭地区硫化氢形成机理及分布预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5): 84-92.
[15] 张道伟, 薛建勤, 伍坤宇, 陈晓冬, 王牧, 张庆辉, 郭宁. 柴达木盆地英西地区页岩油储层特征及有利区优选[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4): 1-11.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨秋莲, 李爱琴, 孙燕妮, 崔攀峰. 超低渗储层分类方法探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 51 -56 .
[2] 张杰, 赵玉华. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组地震层序地层研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 71 -74 .
[3] 杨占龙, 张正刚, 陈启林, 郭精义,沙雪梅, 刘文粟. 利用地震信息评价陆相盆地岩性圈闭的关键点分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 57 -63 .
[4] 朱小燕, 李爱琴, 段晓晨, 田随良, 刘美荣. 镇北油田延长组长3 油层组精细地层划分与对比[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 82 -86 .
[5] 方朝合, 王义凤, 郑德温, 葛稚新. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系烃源岩显微组分分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 87 -90 .
[6] 韩春元,赵贤正,金凤鸣,王权,李先平,王素卿. 二连盆地地层岩性油藏“多元控砂—四元成藏—主元富集”与勘探实践(IV)——勘探实践[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 15 -20 .
[7] 戴朝成,郑荣才,文华国,张小兵. 辽东湾盆地旅大地区古近系层序—岩相古地理编图[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 39 -46 .
[8] 尹艳树,张尚峰,尹太举. 钟市油田潜江组含盐层系高分辨率层序地层格架及砂体分布规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 53 -58 .
[9] 石雪峰,杜海峰. 姬塬地区长3—长4+5油层组沉积相研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 59 -63 .
[10] 严世邦,胡望水,李瑞升,关键,李涛,聂晓红. 准噶尔盆地红车断裂带同生逆冲断裂特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 64 -68 .