岩性油气藏 ›› 2016, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (1): 123–127.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2016.01.017

• 油气田开发 • 上一篇    下一篇

四重介质油藏渗流模型与试井曲线

贾永禄1,孙高飞1,聂仁仕1,李建明2,李海科2   

  1.  1. 西南石油大学 油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室,成都 610500 ;2. 中国石油大庆油田有限责任公司 试油试采分公司地质大队,黑龙江 大庆 163412
  • 出版日期:2016-01-20 发布日期:2016-01-20
  • 作者简介:贾永禄( 1948- ),男,教授,博士生导师,主要从事油气渗流理论和油气藏工程的教学与科研工作。 地址:( 610500 )四川省成都市新都区西南石油大学石油与天然气工程学院。 E-mail : 1017955097@qq.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学青年基金项目“缝洞型碳酸盐岩多段压裂水平井压力动态研究”(编号: 51304164 )和高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金新教师类资助课题“页岩气多段压裂水平井缝网渗流井底压力动态研究”(编号: 20135121120001 )联合资助

Flow model and well test curves for quadruple-media reservoirs

Jia Yonglu1, Sun Gaofei1, Nie Renshi1, Li Jianming2, Li Haike2   

  1.  1. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation , Southwest Petroleum University ,Chengdu 610500 , China ; 2. Well Testing and Perforating Company , PetroChina Daqing Oilfield Co. Ltd. ,Daqing 163412 , Heilongjiang , China
  • Online:2016-01-20 Published:2016-01-20

摘要:

在发育缝洞型四重介质的碳酸盐岩油藏中,其大裂缝和微裂缝的渗流机理不同,以往建立的常规多重介质试井模型不能适应四重介质油藏试井解释需求。 因此,基于基质、微裂缝、溶蚀孔洞和大裂缝组成的四重介质,建立物理和数学模型,并利用 Laplace 变换、 Stehfest 数值反演等方法进行求解,得到实空间解,进而绘制试井曲线。 分析表明:四重介质油藏压力导数曲线的过渡段将出现 3 个“凹子”,其深浅以及出现时间的早晚受弹性储容比和窜流系数的共同影响;弹性储容比影响“凹子”的宽度和深度,窜流系数影响“凹子”出现的时间,同时对“凹子”的深度和宽度也有一定的影响;决定四重介质油藏试井曲线特征的参数较多,曲线对参数的变化比较灵敏;含有微裂缝和大裂缝的缝洞型碳酸盐岩油藏,更适合用四重介质试井模型进行解释。

关键词: 细粒沉积岩, 岩石类型, 岩相, 脆性指数

Abstract:

For fractured-vuggy quadruple-media carbonate reservoirs with micro-fractures and fractures, the percolation mechanism of large-scale fractures is inconsistent from the small-scale fractures. Using conventional multiple media models to explain quadruple-media reservoirs is inappropriate. A quadruple-media physical and mathematical model based on matrix, micro-fractures, vugs and fractures was established. By means of Laplace transformation and numerical inversion of Stehfest, the real space solution was obtained, and well test curves were drawn up. The result shows that three concaves tend to be present in the pressure derivative curve of the quardrule-media reservoir, of which the amplitude is affected by the interporosity flow coefficient and capacitance coefficient. The width and depth of the concaves are influenced by capacitance coefficient, and the timing and the ampli-tude of concave are affected by interporosity flow coefficient. More parameters present in the quadruple-media reservoirs well testing curves, and curves are more sensitive to the change of parameters. It is suitable to use the quadruple-media well testing models to interpret fractured-vuggy carbonate reservoirs with fractures and micro-fractures

Key words: fine-grained sedimentary rocks , rock types , lithofacies , brittleness index

[1]曾桃.缝洞型碳酸盐岩油藏渗流理论及不稳定试井分析方法研究[D]. 成都:西南石油大学,2006:63-64.

Zeng Tao. Percolation theory and transient well testing analysis of fractured-vuggy carbonate reservoir[D]. Chengdu:Southwest Petroleum University,2006:63-64.

[2]范昱,陈洪德,林良彪,等.黔南独山地区上石炭统大埔组碳酸盐岩储层特征研究[J].岩性油气藏,2010,22(增刊 1):37-43.

Fan Yu,Chen Hongde,Lin Liangbiao,et al. Carbonate reservoir characteristics of Upper Carboniferous Dapu Formation in Dushan area,southern Guizhou[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2010,22(Suppl.1): 37-43.

[3]滕团余,潘建国,张虎权,等.塔中地区碳酸盐岩储层综合预测技术分析[J].岩性油气藏,2010,22(4):14-19.

Teng Tuanyu,Pan Jianguo,Zhang Huquan,et al. Prediction technique of carbonate reservoir in Tazhong area[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2010,22(4):14-19.

[4]李传亮.两种双重介质的对比与分析[J].岩性油气藏,2008,20(4):128-131.

Li Chuanliang. Two types of dual porosity media[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2008,20(4):128-131.

[5]程时清,屈雪峰.三重介质模型试井分析方法[J].油气井测试,1997,6(1):5-11.

Cheng Shiqing,Qu Xuefeng. Well testing analysis method for the triple porosity reservoir[J]. Well Testing,1997,6(1):5-11.

[6]张德志,姚军,王子胜,等.三重介质油藏试井解释模型及压力特征[J].新疆石油地质,2008,29(2):222-226.

Zhang Dezhi,Yao Jun,Wang Zisheng,et al. Well test interpretation model and pressure response for triple porosity media reservoir[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2008,29(2):222-226.

[7]刘洪,王新海,杨锋,等.三重介质低渗油藏压力响应特征[J].石油天然气学报,2011,33(8):134-137.

Liu Hong,Wang Xinhai,Yang Feng,et al. The pressure response feature of low permeability and triple-media reservoirs[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology,2011,33(8):134-137.

[8]Nie R,Meng Y,Jia Y,et al. Unsteady inter-porosity flow modeling for a multiple media reservoir[J]. Acta Geophysica,2012,60(1): 232-259.

[9]Wu Y S,Ehlig-Economides C,Qin G,et al. A triple continuum pressure transient model for a naturally fractured vuggy reservoir[C]. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition,Anaheim,California,2007.

[10]张利军,程时清,尹洪军.双渗三重介质油藏试井分析[J].特种油气藏,2008,15(5):66-69.

Zhang Lijun,Cheng Shiqing,Yin Hongjun. Well test analysis of a dual-permeability triple-medium reservoir[J]. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs,2008,15(5):66-69.

[11]刘洪,任路,胡治华.缝洞型油藏钻遇溶洞油井的压力曲线特征[J].岩性油气藏,2012,24(2):124-128.

Liu Hong,Ren Lu,Hu Zhihua. Pressure curve characteristics for wells drilled in cave of fracture-cavity carbonate reservoirs [J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2012,24(2):124-128.

[12]Pulido H,Samaniego F V,Rivera J,et al. On a well-test pressure theory of analysis for naturally fractured reservoirs considering transient interporosity matrix microfractures vugs and fractures flow[C].SPE International Oil Conference and Exhibition,Mexico,2006.

[13]Nelson R A. Geologic analysis of naturally fractured reservoirs[M].Boston:Gulf Publishing,2001:89-94.

[14]南珺祥,王素荣,姚卫华,等.鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区延长组长 6—8 特低渗透储层微裂缝研究[J].岩性油气藏,2007,19(4):40-44.

Nan Junxiang,Wang Surong,Yao Weihua,et al. Micro-fractures in extra-low permeability reservoir of Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2007,19(4):40-44.

 
[1] 柴毓, 王贵文, 柴新. 四川盆地金秋区块三叠系须二段储层非均质性及成因[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 29-40.
[2] 尹兴平, 蒋裕强, 付永红, 张雪梅, 雷治安, 陈超, 张海杰. 渝西地区五峰组—龙马溪组龙一1亚段页岩岩相及储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 41-51.
[3] 徐宁宁, 王永诗, 张守鹏, 邱隆伟, 张向津, 林茹. 鄂尔多斯盆地大牛地气田二叠系盒1段储层特征及成岩圈闭[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 52-62.
[4] 丛平, 闫建平, 井翠, 张家浩, 唐洪明, 王军, 耿斌, 王敏, 晁静. 页岩气储层可压裂性级别测井评价及展布特征——以川南X地区五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 177-188.
[5] 杨洋, 石万忠, 张晓明, 王任, 徐笑丰, 刘俞佐, 白卢恒, 曹沈厅, 冯芊. 页岩岩相的测井曲线识别方法——以焦石坝地区五峰组-龙马溪组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 135-146.
[6] 杨凡凡, 姚宗全, 杨帆, 德勒恰提·加娜塔依, 张磊, 曹天儒. 准噶尔盆地玛北地区三叠系百口泉组岩石物理相[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 99-108.
[7] 彭军, 许天宇, 于乐丹. 东营凹陷沙河街组四段湖相细粒沉积特征及其控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5): 1-12.
[8] 王继伟, 朱玉双, 饶欣久, 周树勋, 吴英强, 杨红梅. 鄂尔多斯盆地胡尖山地区长61致密砂岩储层成岩特征与孔隙度定量恢复[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3): 34-43.
[9] 陈明江, 程亮, 陆涛. Ahdeb油田Khasib油藏孔隙结构及其对注水开发的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3): 133-143.
[10] 李百强, 张小莉, 王起琮, 郭彬程, 郭艳琴, 尚晓庆, 程浩, 卢俊辉, 赵希. 低渗—特低渗白云岩储层成岩相分析及测井识别——以伊陕斜坡马五段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(5): 70-83.
[11] 曹茜, 戚明辉, 张昊天, 黄毅, 张烨毓. 一种基于应力-应变特征的岩石脆性指数评价改进方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(4): 54-61.
[12] 刘跃杰, 刘书强, 马强, 姚宗森, 佘家朝. BP神经网络法在三塘湖盆地芦草沟组页岩岩相识别中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(4): 101-111.
[13] 张以明, 陈树光, 崔永谦, 田建章, 王鑫, 王孟华. 二连盆地乌兰花凹陷安山岩岩相展布及储层预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(6): 1-9.
[14] 徐波, 王建, 于乐丹, 王凯泽, 董凤娟, 刘峰. 致密油储层成岩相类型及其对产能的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地姜家川地区长8储层为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(6): 109-116.
[15] 王伟, 吴奎, 何京, 张金辉, 沈洪涛. 锦州25-1油田优质储层地震响应特征与定量预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(3): 100-111.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 旷红伟,高振中,王正允,王晓光. 一种独特的隐蔽油藏——夏9井区成岩圈闭油藏成因分析及其对勘探的启迪[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 8 -14 .
[2] 李国军, 郑荣才,唐玉林,汪洋,唐楷. 川东北地区飞仙关组层序- 岩相古地理特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 64 -70 .
[3] 蔡佳. 琼东南盆地长昌凹陷新近系三亚组沉积相[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(5): 46 -54 .
[4] 章惠, 关达, 向雪梅, 陈勇. 川东北元坝东部须四段裂缝型致密砂岩储层预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(1): 133 -139 .
[5] 付广,刘博,吕延防. 泥岩盖层对各种相态天然气封闭能力综合评价方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 21 -26 .
[6] 马中良,曾溅辉,张善文,王永诗,王洪玉,刘惠民. 砂岩透镜体油运移过程模拟及成藏主控因素分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 69 -74 .
[7] 王英民. 对层序地层学工业化应用中层序分级混乱问题的探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 9 -15 .
[8] 卫平生, 潘树新, 王建功, 雷 明. 湖岸线和岩性地层油气藏的关系研究 —— 论“坳陷盆地湖岸线控油”[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 27 -31 .
[9] 易定红, 石兰亭, 贾义蓉. 吉尔嘎朗图凹陷宝饶洼槽阿尔善组层序地层与隐蔽油藏[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 68 -72 .
[10] 杨占龙, 彭立才, 陈启林, 郭精义, 李在光, 黄云峰. 吐哈盆地胜北洼陷岩性油气藏成藏条件与油气勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 62 -67 .