岩性油气藏 ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (2): 36–43.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2017.02.005

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

二连盆地赛汉塔拉凹陷原油地球化学特征与油族划分

王浩1,2, 王飞宇1, 降栓奇3, 吴忠3, 邢雅文3, 蓝宝峰3   

  1. 1. 中国石油大学(北京) 地球科学学院, 北京 102249;
    2. 西北大学 研究生院, 西安 710069;
    3. 中国石油华北油田分公司 勘探开发研究院, 河北 任丘 062552
  • 收稿日期:2017-01-11 修回日期:2017-02-07 出版日期:2017-03-21 发布日期:2017-03-21
  • 通讯作者: 王飞宇(1963-),男,博士,教授,主要从事石油地质学方面的教学和科研工作。Email:fywang@cup.edu.cn。
  • 作者简介:王浩(1991-),男,中国石油大学(北京)在读硕士研究生,研究方向为石油地质学。地址:(102249)北京市昌平区府学路18号中国石油大学(北京)地球科学学院。Email:herbert_wh@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    中国石油天然气股份有限公司重大科技专项“华北油田上产稳产800 万吨关键技术研究与应用”(编号:2014E-35-07)资助

The oil families and their geochemical characteristics in Sanhantala Sag,Erlian Basin

WANG Hao1,2, WANG Feiyu1, JIANG Shuanqi3, WU Zhong3, XING Yawen3, LAN Baofeng3   

  1. 1. College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China;
    2. Northwest University, Xi'an 710069, China;
    3. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Huabei Oilfield Company, Renqiu 062552, Hebei, China
  • Received:2017-01-11 Revised:2017-02-07 Online:2017-03-21 Published:2017-03-21

摘要: 赛汉塔拉凹陷是二连盆地富油气凹陷之一,为揭示其原油特征及成因,对典型探井原油进行了原油物性和地球化学分析。原油物性数据显示,赛汉塔拉凹陷原油含硫量低、黏度低,API为28°~39°,总体为低成熟—成熟原油;不同层位原油的生物标志化合物参数差异较小,说明其沉积环境相似,为同一烃源岩不同成熟阶段排出的原油。选取原油伽马蜡烷/C30 霍烷,C30*/C29Ts,Pr/Ph,重排甾烷/规则甾烷及甾烷异构化等参数进行聚类分析,赛汉塔拉凹陷原油可划分为2 个油族:油族1 为烃源岩在成熟阶段排出的原油,以阿尔善组和腾一段原油为代表;油族2 为烃源岩在成熟阶段早期排出的原油,以腾二段原油为代表。勘探层系应集中在阿尔善组和腾一段储层中。

关键词: 致密砂岩储层, 沉积环境, 成岩作用, 储层评价, 勘探选区

Abstract: The Saihantala Sag is the one of hydrocarbon rich sags in Erlian Basin. The physical properties and geochemisty data of oil samples were analyzed to identify the feature and generation of oil in Saihantala Sag. The physical property data of oil show that the crude oil samples are in low-moderate maturity stage with low viscosity, low sulfur content and API in a range of 28°-39°. New geochemical data have been gathered from crude oil samples, and denote that the crude oil derived from source rocks with similar depositional environment and expelled hydrocarbon in different mature stages. Several variables including ratios of gammacerane/C30 hopane, C30*/ C29 Ts, Pr/Ph,diasteranes/regular steranes, and sterane isomerization parameters, were selected to carry out cluster analysis,and the crude oil in Sanhantala Sag can be divided into two oil families. Oil-family I mainly distributes in Lower Cretaceous K1 ba, K1 bt1 and expelled from source rocks in the late phase of oil window; Oil-family Ⅱ is mainly from K1 bt2 and derived from source rocks in the early phase of oil window. The data of crude oil suggest that the exploration zone should be aimed at the reservoirs of the K1 ba and K1 bt1.

Key words: tight sandstone reservoir , sedimentary environments, diagenesis, reservoire valuation, prospecting area

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.1+13
[1] HUNT J M. Petroleum geochemistry and geology. 2nd ed. New York:WH Freeman and Company,1995.
[2] CHEN Z L,LIU G D,HUANG Z L,et al. Controls of oil family distribution and composition in nonmarine petroleum systems: a case study from Inner Mongolia Erlian basin,Northern China. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,2014,92:36-52.
[3] 包建平,张功成,朱俊章,等. 渤中凹陷原油生物标志物特征 与成因类型划分. 中国海上油气(地质),2002,16(1):11-18. BAO J P,ZHANG G C,ZHU J Z,et al. Biomarker compostion and origin classification of crude oil in Bozhong Sag,Bohai Sea. China Offshore Oli and Gas(Geology),2002,16(1):11-18.
[4] 何文祥,王培荣,潘贤庄,等. 莺—琼盆地原油类型划分及成 因探讨. 天然气地球科学,2004,15(2):133-136. HE W X,WANG P R,PAN X Z,et al. The discussion of the crude oil type and its origin in Yingqiong Basin. Natural Gas Geoscience,2004,15(2):133-136.
[5] 李美俊,王铁冠,王春江,等. 塔河油田奥陶系原油三芳甾分 布及原油族群划分. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2012, 36(5):20-24. LI M J,WANG T G,WANG C J,et al. Distribution of triaromatic steroids and oil family classification of Ordovician oils in Tahe Oilfield. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science),2012,36(5):20-24.
[6] 柳广弟,杨伟伟,冯渊,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区延长组原 油地球化学特征及成因类型划分. 地学前缘,2013,20(2): 108-115. LIU G D,YANG W W,FENG Y,et al. Geochemical characteristics and genetic types of crude oil from Yanchang Formation in Longdong area,Ordos Basin. Earth Science Frontiers, 2013,20(2):108-115.
[7] 宋成鹏,罗晓容,郝雪峰,等. 牛庄洼陷南斜坡沙河街组原油 成因类型的多参数聚类分析. 石油实验地质,2013,35(4): 457-463. SONG C P,LUO X R,HAO X F,et al. Multiparameter cluster analysis of crude oil type in Shahejie Formation,southern slope of Niuzhuang Sub-sag. Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2013, 35(4):457-463.
[8] 王强,王飞宇,陈琰,等. 柴达木盆地西部油族划分及成因研 究.地球化学,2014,43(2):122-130. WANG Q,WANG F Y,CHEN Y,et al. The oil families and their genesis in the western Qaidam Basin. Geochimica,2014, 43(2):122-130.
[9] 杨伟伟,柳广弟,王延山,等. 辽河滩海地区原油地球化学特 征及成因类型.石油与天然气地质,2011,32(5):642-650. YANG W W,LIU G D,WANG Y S,et al. Geochemical behaviors and gentic types of crude oil in tidal zone and shallow water area of Liaohe oilfield. Oil & Gas Geology,2011,32(5): 642-650.
[10] 闫文华,张万福,张立新,等. 二连盆地赛汉塔拉凹陷地质综 合评价及目标优选. 石油地球物理勘探,2008,43(增刊1): 139-145. YAN W H,ZHANG W F,ZHANG L X,et al. Integrative geologic evaluation and objective optimization of Saihantala Sag, Erlian Basin. Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2008,43(Suppl 1): 139-145.
[11] 赵志刚,李亮,李书民,等. 二连盆地赛汉塔拉凹陷构造样式 及凹陷成因类型研究.大庆石油地质与开发,2005,24(6):11-13. ZHAO Z G,LI L,LI S M,et al. Structure style of Saihantala Sag in Erlian Basin and its genesis type. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2005,24(6):11-13.
[12] 尹志军,田世清,杨志彬,等. 内蒙二连盆地赛汉塔拉凹陷下 白垩统层序地层及有利成藏条件. 古地理学报,2009,11(3): 330-337. YIN Z J,TIAN S Q,YANG Z B,et al. Sequence stratigraphy and beneficial hydrocarbon accumulation conditions of the Lower Cretaceous in Saihantala Sag,Erlian Basin,Inner Mongolia. Journal of Palaegeography,2009,11(3):330-337.
[13] 屈晓艳,杨明慧,罗晓华,等. 二连盆地赛汉塔拉凹陷伸展构 造特征及其控藏作用.现代地质,2013,27(5):1023-1032. QU X Y,YANG M H,LUO X H,et al. Extensional tectonic feature and its control on hydrocarbon accumulation of Saihantala Sag in Erlian Basin. Geoscience,2013,27(5):1023-1032.
[14] 程三友,刘少峰,苏三,等. 二连盆地赛汉塔拉凹陷构造特征 分析. 石油地球物理勘探,2011,46(6):961-969. CHENG S Y,LIU S F,SU S,et al. Structural characteristics analysis of Saihantala Sag in Erlian Basin. Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2011,46(6):961-969.
[15] 赵贤正,柳广弟,金凤鸣,等. 小型断陷湖盆有效烃源岩分布 特征与分布模式——以二连盆地下白垩统为例. 石油学报, 2015,36(6):641-652. ZHAO X Z,LIU G D,JIN F M,et al. Distribution features and pattern of effective source rock in small faulted lacustrine basin: a case study of the Lower Cretaceous in Erlian Basin. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(6):641-652.
[16] 丁修建,柳广弟,黄志龙,等. 二连盆地赛汉塔拉凹陷烃源岩 的分布及形成. 中南大学学报(自然科学版),2015,44(5): 1739-1746. DING X J,LIU G D,HUANG Z L,et al. Source rock distribution and formation in Saihantala Depression,Erlian Basin. Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology),2015,44 (5):1739-1746.
[17] PEPPER A S,CORVI P J. Simple kinetic models of petroleum formation. Part I:oil and gas generation from kerogen. Marine and Pteroleum Geology,1995,12(3):291-319.
[18] PETERS K E,WALTERS C C,MICHAEL M J. The biomarker guide,Volume 1. 2nd ed. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2005.
[19] 张枝焕,杨永才,李伟. 油藏地球化学原理及其在油气勘探与 油藏评价中的应用.海相油气地质,2006,11(4):39-47. ZHANG Z H,YANG Y C,LI W. The principles of reservoir geochemistry and its applications in petroleum exploration and reservoir appraisal. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2006,11 (4):39-47.
[20] 李任伟. 伽马蜡烷的地质产状及古环境意义. 科学通报,1988 (20):1574-1576. LI R W. Geological occurrence and its paleoenvironental signigicance of gammacerane. Chinese Science Bulletin,1988(20): 1574-1576.
[21] 梁明亮,王作栋,郑建京,等. 辽河断陷烃源岩有机地球化学 特征. 岩性油气藏,2014,26(4):110-116. LIANG M L,WANG Z D,ZHENG J J,et al. Organic geochemistry characteristics of source rocks in Liaohe Depression. Lithologic Reservoirs,2014,26(4):110-116.
[22] 张明峰,妥进才,张小军,等. 柴达木盆地乌南油田油源及油 气运移探讨.岩性油气藏,2014,24(2):61-66. ZHANG M F,TUO J C,ZHANG X J,et al. Discussion on oil sources and petroleum migration in the Wunan Oilfield,Qaidam Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs,2014,24(2):61-66.
[1] 柴毓, 王贵文, 柴新. 四川盆地金秋区块三叠系须二段储层非均质性及成因[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 29-40.
[2] 陈亚军, 荆文波, 宋小勇, 何伯斌, 伍宏美, 王睿, 解士建, 宋凯辉, 马强. 三塘湖盆地马朗凹陷上石炭统沉积岩层地球化学特征及古环境意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 63-75.
[3] 郑荣臣, 李宏涛, 史云清, 肖开华. 川东北元坝地区三叠系须三段沉积特征及成岩作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 13-26.
[4] 龙盛芳, 王玉善, 李国良, 段传丽, 邵映明, 何咏梅, 陈凌云, 焦煦. 苏里格气田苏49区块盒8下亚段致密储层非均质性特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 59-69.
[5] 张艳, 高世臣, 孟婉莹, 成育红, 蒋思思. 致密砂岩储层AVO正演模拟过程中的不确定性分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 120-128.
[6] 张鹏, 杨巧云, 范宜仁, 张云, 张海涛. 基于Xu-White模型的致密砂岩储层含气性评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 138-145.
[7] 彭军, 许天宇, 于乐丹. 东营凹陷沙河街组四段湖相细粒沉积特征及其控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5): 1-12.
[8] 王朋, 孙灵辉, 王核, 李自安. 鄂尔多斯盆地吴起地区延长组长6储层特征及其控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5): 63-72.
[9] 张满郎, 孔凡志, 谷江锐, 郭振华, 付晶, 郑国强, 钱品淑. 九龙山气田珍珠冲组砂砾岩储层评价及有利区优选[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3): 1-13.
[10] 王继伟, 朱玉双, 饶欣久, 周树勋, 吴英强, 杨红梅. 鄂尔多斯盆地胡尖山地区长61致密砂岩储层成岩特征与孔隙度定量恢复[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3): 34-43.
[11] 庞小军, 王清斌, 解婷, 赵梦, 冯冲. 黄河口凹陷北缘古近系物源及其对优质储层的控制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 1-13.
[12] 陈怡婷, 刘洛夫, 王梦尧, 窦文超, 徐正建. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部长6、长7储集层特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(1): 51-65.
[13] 李佳思, 付磊, 张金龙, 陈静, 牛斌, 张顺存. 准噶尔盆地乌夏地区中上二叠统碎屑岩成岩作用及次生孔隙演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(6): 54-66.
[14] 郭艳琴, 何子琼, 郭彬程, 惠磊, 蔡志成, 王美霞, 李文厚, 李百强. 苏里格气田东南部盒8段致密砂岩储层特征及评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(5): 1-11.
[15] 叶亚培, 唐书恒, 郗兆栋, 张耀选. 黔北地区牛蹄塘组页岩矿物组成特征与脆性评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(4): 62-71.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 魏钦廉, 郑荣才, 肖玲, 王成玉, 牛小兵. 鄂尔多斯盆地吴旗地区长6 储层特征及影响因素分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 45 -50 .
[2] 王东琪, 殷代印. 水驱油藏相对渗透率曲线经验公式研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(3): 159 -164 .
[3] 李云,时志强. 四川盆地中部须家河组致密砂岩储层流体包裹体研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 27 -32 .
[4] 蒋韧,樊太亮,徐守礼. 地震地貌学概念与分析技术[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 33 -38 .
[5] 邹明亮,黄思静,胡作维,冯文立,刘昊年. 西湖凹陷平湖组砂岩中碳酸盐胶结物形成机制及其对储层质量的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 47 -52 .
[6] 王冰洁,何生,倪军娥,方度. 板桥凹陷钱圈地区主干断裂活动性分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 75 -82 .
[7] 陈振标,张超谟,张占松,令狐松,孙宝佃. 利用NMRT2谱分布研究储层岩石孔隙分形结构[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 105 -110 .
[8] 张厚福,徐兆辉. 从油气藏研究的历史论地层-岩性油气藏勘探[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 114 -123 .
[9] 张 霞. 勘探创造力的培养[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 16 -20 .
[10] 杨午阳, 杨文采, 刘全新, 王西文. 三维F-X域粘弹性波动方程保幅偏移方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 86 -91 .