岩性油气藏 ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (4): 47–54.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2017.04.006

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

湘西北地区新元古界陡山沱组页岩气成藏条件

彭波1, 刘羽琛2, 漆富成1, 王振云1   

  1. 1. 核工业北京地质研究院, 北京 100029;
    2. 中国石油集团东方地球物理勘探有限责任公司, 河北 涿州 072750
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-28 修回日期:2017-03-12 出版日期:2017-07-21 发布日期:2017-07-21
  • 作者简介:彭波(1983-),男,博士后,从事石油地质及非常规页岩气评价方面的研究工作。地址:(100029)北京市朝阳区安外小关东里10号院核工业北京地质研究院。Email:pengbe18@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    中国地质调查局项目“湘鄂地区新元古界海相页岩气基础地质条件研究”（编号：1211302108020-3）和中国地质调查局油气资源调查中心项目“湖南桑植地区1：5万页岩气基础地质调查填图试点”（编号：DD20160182-03）联合资助

Shale gas accumulation conditions of Neoproterozoic Doushantuo Formation in NW Hunan province

PENG Bo1, LIU Yuchen2, QI Fucheng1, WANG Zhenyun1   

  1. 1. CNNC Beijing Research Institute of Uranium Geology, Beijing 100029, China;
    2. Bureau of Geophysical Prospecting INC., CNPC, Zhuozhou 072750, Hebei, China
  • Received:2017-12-28 Revised:2017-03-12 Online:2017-07-21 Published:2017-07-21

PDF (PC)

367

摘要： 湘西北地区广泛发育新元古界震旦系陡山沱组暗色泥页岩，已有钻井中气显示活跃，揭示出该地区较好的页岩气勘探潜力。在观察野外地质露头的基础上，通过地球化学分析、扫描电镜、X射线衍射、低温氮气吸附、等温吸附等分析测试，对陡山沱组泥页岩的发育及分布规律、有机地球化学特征、储层特征及吸附性能等页岩气成藏条件进行了综合研究，并优选了有利区带。结果表明：湘西北地区陡山沱组暗色泥页岩分布变化大，仅在大庸向斜地区沉积厚度较大，为20~50 m，有机碳质量分数为0.5%~3.0%，有机质类型以Ⅰ型为主，有机质成熟度为3.0%~4.0%，达到过成熟演化阶段，具备较为有利的生气条件；泥页岩储层矿物成分以脆性矿物为主，质量分数为21%~78.7%，发育多种类型孔隙空间，比表面积和孔体积均较高，多个泥页岩样品等温吸附实验统计显示，甲烷最大吸附质量体积为0.80~1.77 m3/t，泥页岩储层具有较好的储集条件及吸附性能。湘西北大庸向斜地区构造条件相对稳定，保存条件较好，具有有利的页岩气成藏条件，可作为陡山沱组页岩气勘探的有利区带。

关键词: 层序格架, 近岸水下扇, 辫状河三角洲, 阿尔善组, 洪浩尔舒特凹陷

Abstract: Shale of the Neoproterozoic Doushantuo Formation is widely developed in Northwestern Hunan province. With better gas show in shale gas wells,it revealed better gas potential of the Doushantuo Formation shale. Based on outcrop observation,combined with analysis of organic geochemical test, SEM, X-ray diffraction, low-temperature nitrogen adsorption-desorption and isothermal adsorption,the accumulation conditions and characteristics of shale gas of the Neoproterozoic Doushantuo Formation were studied. The results show that the shale development in the study area is not uniform,and the relatively large cumulative depositional thickness is 20-50m in Dayong syncline. The TOC mass fraction of shale is 0.5%-3.0%,the organic matter is mainly type Ⅰ, and the Ro is 3%-4%,which has reached over-mature evolution stage,with favorable conditions for gas generation. The reservoir minerals of shale are mainly of brittle minerals,with mass fraction of 21.0%-78.7%. The various types of pore spaces developed in shale support high specific surface area and pore volume. The maximum methane absorbance is 0.80-1.77 m3/t. All of the characteristics of shale mean the advantageous geological conditions of shale gas enrichment and accumulation. With steady tectonic setting, favorable preservation conditions and advantageous shale gas accumulation conditions, Dayong syncline is favorable for shale gas exploration.

Key words: sequence framework, nearshore subaqueous fan, braided delta, A'ershan Formation, Honghaoershute Sag

中图分类号: 

  • TE121
[1] CURTIS J B. Fractured shale-gas systems. AAPG Bulletin, 2002, 86(11):1921-1938.
[2] JARVIE D M, HILL R J, RUBLE T E, et al. Unconventional shale-gas systems:the Mississippian Barnett Shale of northcentral Texas as one model for thermogenic shale-gas assessment. AAPG Bulletin, 2007, 91(4):475-499.
[3] 张金川, 金之钧, 袁明生.页岩气成藏机理和分布.天然气工业, 2004, 24(7):15-18. ZHANG J C, JIN Z J, YUAN M S. Reservoiring mechanism of shale gas and its distribution. Natural Gas Industry, 2004, 24(7):15-18.
[4] 邹才能, 董大忠, 王社教, 等.中国页岩气形成机理、地质特征及资源潜力.石油勘探与开发, 2010, 37(6):641-653. ZOU C N, DONG D Z, WANG S J, et al. Geological characteristics, formation mechanism and resource potential of shale gas in China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2010, 37(6):641-653.
[5] 董大忠, 邹才能, 李建忠, 等.页岩气资源潜力与勘探开发前景.地质通报, 2011, 30(2/3):324-336. DONG D Z, ZOU C N, LI J Z, et al. Resource potential, exploration and development prospect of shale gas in the whole world. Geological Bulletin of China, 2011, 30(2/3):324-336.
[6] 郭彤楼, 刘若冰.复杂构造区高演化程度海相页岩气勘探突破的启示——以四川盆地东部盆缘JY1井为例.天然气地球科学, 2013, 24(4):643-651. GUO T L, LIU R B. Implications from marine shale gas exploration breakthrough in complicated structural area at high thermal stage:taking Longmaxi Formation in well JY1 as example. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2013, 24(4):643-651.
[7] 郭旭升.南方海相页岩气"二元富集" 规律——四川盆地及周缘龙马溪组页岩气勘探实践认识. 地质学报, 2014, 88(7):1209-1218. GUO X S. Rules of two-factor enrichment for marine shale gas in southern China:understanding from the Longmaxi Forma-tion shale gas in Sichuan Basin and its surrounding area. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2014, 88(7):1209-1218.
[8] 湖南省地质矿产局.湖南省区域地质志.北京:地质出版社, 1988. Bureau of Geology and Mineral Exploration and Development of Hunan Province. Regional geology of Hunan province. Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 1988.
[9] 匡文龙, 刘新华, 陈年生, 等.湘西北下光荣矿区铅锌矿床主要地球化学特征.地质科学, 2008, 43(4):685-694. KUANG W L, LIU X H, CHEN N S, et al. Main geochemical characteristics of lead-zinc deposits in Xiaguangrong ore district, northwestern Hunan. Chinese Journal of Geology, 2008, 43(4):685-694.
[10] 程立雪, 王元君, 陈洪德, 等.上扬子地区震旦系-早古生界黑色页岩的沉积和埋藏环境. 岩石学报, 2013, 29(8):2906-2911. CHENG L X, WANG Y J, CHEN H D, et al. Sedimentary and burial environment of black shales of Sinian to Early Paleozoic in Upper Yangtze region. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2013, 29(8):2906-2911.
[11] 胡宗全, 由伟丰, 李松, 等. 中国早震旦世构造-岩相古地理. 地学前缘, 2013, 20(5):248-255. HU Z Q, YOU W F, LI S, et al. Tectono-lithofacies paleogeography of China in the Early Sinian. Earth Science Frontiers, 2013, 20(5):248-255.
[12] 李国亮, 王先辉, 罗鹏, 等.湘西北地区震旦纪陡山陀组页岩气储层特征.中国煤炭地质, 2014, 26(6):5-9. LI G L, WANG X H, LUO P, et al. Shale gas reservoir characteristics in Sinian Doushantuo Formation, northwestern Hunan. Coal Geology of China, 2014, 26(6):5-9.
[13] LU X C, LI F C, WATSON A T. Adsorption measurements in Devonian Shales. Fuel, 1995, 74(4):599-603.
[14] CHENG A L, HUANG W L. Selective adsorption of hydrocarbon gases on clays and organic matter. Organic Geochemistry, 2004, 35(4):413-423.
[15] HILL D G, LOMBARDI T E, MARTIN J P. Fractured shale gas potential in New York. Northeastern Geology and Environmental Sciences, 2004, 26(1/2):57-78.
[16] BOWKER K A. Barnett Shale gas production, Fort Worth Basin:issues and discussion. AAPG Bulletin, 2007, 91(4):523-533.
[17] LOUCKS R G, REED R M, RUPPEL S C, et al. Morphology, genesis and distribution of nanometer-scale pores in siliceous mudstones of the Mississippian Barnett Shale. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 2009, 79:848-861.
[18] MILNER M, MCLIN R, PETRIELLO J, et al. Imaging texture and porosity in mudstones and shales:comparison of secondary and ion-milled backscatter SEM methods. SPE 138975, 2010:1-10.
[19] 陈尚斌, 朱炎铭, 王红岩, 等.川南龙马溪组页岩气储层纳米孔隙结构特征及其成藏意义. 煤炭学报, 2012, 37(3):438-444. CHEN S B, ZHU Y M, WANG H Y, et al. Structure characteristics and accumulation significance of nanopores in Longmaxi shale gas reservoir in the southern Sichuan Basin. Journal of China Coal Society, 2012, 37(3):438-444.
[20] 郭旭升, 李宇平, 刘若冰, 等.四川盆地焦石坝地区龙马溪组页岩微观孔隙结构特征及其控制因素.天然气工业, 2014, 34(6):9-16. GUO X S, LI Y P, LIU R B, et al. Characteristics and controlling factors of micro-pore structures of Longmaxi shale play in the Jiaoshiba area, Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Industry, 2014, 34(6):9-16.
[21] 龚小平, 唐洪明, 赵峰, 等.四川盆地龙马溪组页岩储层孔隙结构的定量表征.岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(3):48-57. GONG X P, TANG H M, ZHAO F, et al. Quantitative characterization of pore structure in shale reservoir of Longmaxi Formation in Sichuan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(3):48-57.
[22] 闫建平, 崔志鹏, 耿斌, 等.四川盆地龙马溪组与大安寨段泥页岩差异性分析.岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(4):16-23. YAN J P, CUI Z P, GENG B, et al. Differences of shale between Longmaxi Formation and Da'anzhai member in Sichuan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(4):16-23.
[23] 李可, 王兴志, 张馨艺, 等.四川盆地东部下志留统龙马溪组页岩储层特征及影响因素.岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(5):52-58. LI K, WANG X Z, ZHANG X Y, et al. Shale reservoir characteristics and influencing factors of the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in the eastern Sichuan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(5):52-58.
[24] SING K S W, EVERETT D H, HAUL R A W, et al. Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 1985, 57(4):603-619.
[25] BRUNAUER S, EMMET P H, TELLER E. Adsorption of gases in multi molecular layers. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1938, 60(2):309-319.
[26] BARRETT E P, JOYNER L G, HALENDA P H. The determination of pore volume and area distributions in porous substances. Ⅰ. Computations from nitrogen isotherms. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1951, 73(1):373-380.
[27] 熊伟, 郭为, 刘洪林, 等.页岩的储层特征以及等温吸附特征. 天然气工业, 2012, 32(1):113-116. XIONG W, GUO W, LIU H L, et al. Shale reservoir characteristics and isothermal adsorption properties. Natural Gas Industry, 2012, 32(1):113-116.
[28] 毕赫, 姜振学, 李鹏等.渝东南地区龙马溪组页岩吸附特征及其影响因素.天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(2):302-310. BI H, JIANG Z X, LI P, et al. Adsorption characteristic and influence factors of Longmaxi shale in southeastern Chongqing. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2014, 25(2):302-310.
[1] 袁纯, 张惠良, 王波. 大型辫状河三角洲砂体构型与储层特征——以库车坳陷北部阿合组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 73-84.
[2] 山鑫杰, 王飞宇, 刘念, 冯伟平, 江涛, 杜喜, 程志强, 李思嘉, 李月. 二连盆地呼仁布其凹陷南洼下白垩统烃源岩分布特征与油源分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3): 104-114.
[3] 杨占龙, 沙雪梅, 魏立花, 黄军平, 肖冬生. 地震隐性层序界面识别、高频层序格架建立与岩性圈闭勘探——以吐哈盆地西缘侏罗系—白垩系为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(6): 1-13.
[4] 赵汉卿, 温慧芸, 穆朋飞, 李超, 吴穹螈. 垦利A油田沙三上段近源辫状河三角洲沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(3): 37-44.
[5] 张以明, 陈树光, 崔永谦, 田建章, 王鑫, 王孟华. 二连盆地乌兰花凹陷安山岩岩相展布及储层预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(6): 1-9.
[6] 常海燕, 严耀祖, 陈更新, 郭宁, 项燚伟, 杨会洁. 近岸水下扇储层构型及剩余油分布模式——以柴达木盆地七个泉油田E31油藏为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(3): 143-152.
[7] 杨占龙, 肖冬生, 周隶华, 黄云峰, 黄小鹏, 沙雪梅. 高分辨率层序格架下的陆相湖盆精细沉积体系研究——以吐哈盆地西缘侏罗系—古近系为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(5): 1-10.
[8] 朱筱敏, 董艳蕾, 张明君, 潘荣, 梁官忠, 张久强. 二连盆地洪浩尔舒特凹陷洪10区块精细沉积学研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(2): 10-18.
[9] 何明薇, 朱筱敏, 朱世发, 魏巍, 吴健平, 王名巍. 二连盆地额仁淖尔凹陷阿尔善组致密储层特征及成岩作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(2): 77-86.
[10] 孙书洋, 朱筱敏, 魏巍, 朱世发, 何明薇, 刘伟, 吴健平. 二连盆地巴音都兰凹陷阿尔善组云质岩储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(2): 87-98.
[11] 李志华, 黄文辉. 辫状河三角洲岩相特征及沉积模式——以鄂尔多斯盆地苏南地区盒8段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(1): 43-50.
[12] 唐 武，王英民，仲米虹 . 隆后坳陷区三角洲沉积特征及演化模式—— — 以桑塔木地区为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(3): 34-41.
[13] 董 越，侯加根，曹 刚，刘钰铭，王梓媛，李 婧. 近岸水下扇岩石相及储层特征分析----以盐家油田盐 227 区为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(5): 60-66.
[14] 王 越，陈世悦，梁绘媛，邓 远 . 和什托洛盖盆地侏罗系辫状河三角洲沉积模式研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(5): 81-86.
[15] 王明飞，屈大鹏，肖伟，凌涛，陈灵君. 四川盆地元坝中部断褶带须四段高分辨率层序地层[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(4): 97-102.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨秋莲, 李爱琴, 孙燕妮, 崔攀峰. 超低渗储层分类方法探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 51 -56 .
[2] 张杰, 赵玉华. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组地震层序地层研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 71 -74 .
[3] 杨占龙, 张正刚, 陈启林, 郭精义,沙雪梅, 刘文粟. 利用地震信息评价陆相盆地岩性圈闭的关键点分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 57 -63 .
[4] 朱小燕, 李爱琴, 段晓晨, 田随良, 刘美荣. 镇北油田延长组长3 油层组精细地层划分与对比[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 82 -86 .
[5] 方朝合, 王义凤, 郑德温, 葛稚新. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系烃源岩显微组分分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 87 -90 .
[6] 韩春元，赵贤正，金凤鸣，王权，李先平，王素卿. 二连盆地地层岩性油藏“多元控砂—四元成藏—主元富集”与勘探实践（IV）——勘探实践[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 15 -20 .
[7] 戴朝成，郑荣才，文华国，张小兵. 辽东湾盆地旅大地区古近系层序—岩相古地理编图[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 39 -46 .
[8] 尹艳树，张尚峰，尹太举. 钟市油田潜江组含盐层系高分辨率层序地层格架及砂体分布规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 53 -58 .
[9] 石雪峰，杜海峰. 姬塬地区长3—长4+5油层组沉积相研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 59 -63 .
[10] 严世邦，胡望水，李瑞升，关键，李涛，聂晓红. 准噶尔盆地红车断裂带同生逆冲断裂特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 64 -68 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发