岩性油气藏 ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (4): 55–63.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2017.04.007

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

“动态物源”精细刻画方法与应用——以琼东南盆地崖南凹陷为例

武爱俊1, 徐建永1, 滕彬彬2, 肖伶俐1, 康波1, 李凡异1, 印斌浩1   

  1. 1. 中海油研究总院, 北京 100028;
    2. 中国石油化工股份有限公司 石油勘探开发研究院, 北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2016-10-08 修回日期:2016-12-14 出版日期:2017-07-21 发布日期:2017-07-21
  • 作者简介:武爱俊(1983-),男,硕士,工程师,主要从事海上油气地质综合研究工作。地址:(100083)北京市朝阳区太阳宫南街6号A座1106。Email:wuaj@cnooc.com.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    十三五”国家重大科技专项“中国近海富烃凹陷优选与有利勘探方向预测”(编号:2016ZX05024-002)资助

Fine description method of dynamic provenance and its application:a case from Yanan Sag,Qiongdongnan Basin

WU Aijun1, XU Jianyong1, TENG Binbin2, XIAO Lingli1, KANG Bo1, LI Fanyi1, YIN Binhao1   

  1. 1. CNOOC Research Institute, Beijing 100028, China;
    2. Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, Sinopec, Beijing 100083, China
  • Received:2016-10-08 Revised:2016-12-14 Online:2017-07-21 Published:2017-07-21

摘要: 随着岩性圈闭勘探的深入,常规物源分析方法已经不能满足油气勘探的需求。根据“动态物源”概念,建立了精细刻画“动态物源”系统的研究方法,丰富了物源分析方法体系。该方法从层序界面识别、体系域划分等层序地层学研究入手,结合压实校正、古水深校正等条件的约束,利用地层定量回剥技术恢复不同体系域沉积初期的古地貌,并通过刻画各体系域沉积初期物源区的面积来判断物源供给量的相对大小,从而达到预测储层发育位置的目的。该方法在琼东南盆地崖南凹陷东南部的陵一段进行了应用,发现该区域在低位体系域时期发育面积较大的局部物源,它所提供的砂体,形成了较大规模的扇三角洲岩性圈闭,该圈闭成藏条件较好,有望成为崖南凹陷岩性圈闭勘探突破的目标。

关键词: 地层岩性油气藏, 分布特征, 控制因素, 冀中坳陷, 古近系

Abstract: With the development of lithologic trap exploration,the conventional provenance analysis method cannot meet the demand of oil and gas exploration. Based on the concept of dynamic provenance,a systematic method of fine description of dynamic provenance was established, which enriches the research methods of provenance analysis. Based on the sequence boundary recognition and systems tract division,combined with the constrain of compaction correction and reestablishing of paleo-water depth,this method uses quantitative back-striping technique to restore the paleogeomorphology at early age of different systems tracts. The development scale of clastic reservoir was determined by characterizing the provenance of the initial sediments in each systems tract, so as to predict the development position of the reservoir. This method was applied to lithologic trap research in Yanan Sag of Qiongdongnan Basin. The result shows that there is a short-term but comparatively large-scale provenance region in LST of Lingshui Formation(E3l1), which could provide abundant sandbodies to form a large lithologic trap associated with fan delta. This lithologic trap has excellent hydrocarbon accumulation conditions,and it might be a break-through of lithologic reservoir exploration in Yanan Sag.

Key words: stratigraphic-lithologic reservoirs, distribution characteristics, controlling factors, Paleogene, Jizhong Depression

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2
[1] 赖维成, 宋章强, 周心怀, 等". 动态物源" 控砂模式.石油勘探与开发, 2010, 37(6):763-768. LAI W C, SONG Z Q, ZHOU X H, et al. Model of dynamic source controlling sand. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2010, 37(6):763-768.
[2] 赵红格, 刘池洋.物源分析方法及研究进展.沉积学报, 2003, 21(3):409-415. ZHAO H G, LIU C Y. Approaches and prospects of provenance analysis. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2003, 21(3):409-415.
[3] 魏然, 李红阳, 于斌, 等.沉积盆地物源体系分析方法及研究进展.岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(3):53-57. WEI R, LI H Y, YU B, et al. Approaches and prospects of provenance system analysis in sedimentary basins. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2013, 25(3):53-57.
[4] 杨仁超, 李进步, 樊爱萍, 等.陆源沉积岩物源分析研究进展与发展趋势.沉积学报, 2013, 31(1):99-107. YANG R C, LI J B, FAN A P, et al. Research progress and development tendency of provenance analysis on terrigenous sedimentary rocks. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2013, 31(1):99-107.
[5] 纪友亮, 周勇, 况军, 等.准噶尔盆地车-莫古隆起形成演化及对沉积相的控制作用.中国科学:D辑(地球化学), 2010, 40(10):1342-1355. JI Y L, ZHOU Y, KUANG J, et al. The formation and evolution of Chepaizi-Mosuowan paleo-uplift and its control on the distributions of sedimentary facies in the Junggar Basin. Science in China:Series D(Earth Science), 2010,40(10):1342-1355.
[6] 陈海清, 杨波, 寿建峰, 等.沉积物源的综合识别与岩性圈闭的确定——以柴达木盆地七个泉地区为例.石油地球物理勘探, 2007, 42(3):284-289. CEN H Q, YANG B, SHOU J F, et al. Comprehensive identification of sedimentary derivation and determination of lithologic trap:an example of Qigequan area in Qaidam Basin. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2007, 42(3):284-289.
[7] 邓运华, 张功成, 刘春成, 等.中国近海两个油气带地质理论与勘探实践.北京:石油工业出版社, 2013. DENG Y H, ZHANG G C, LIU C C, et al. Geological theory and exploration of two oil-gas belt in China offshore. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2013.
[8] 谢玉洪.南海北部自营深水天然气勘探重大突破及其启示. 天然气工业, 2014, 34(10):1-8. XIE Y H. A major breakthrough in deepwater natural gas exploration in a self-run oil/gas field in the northern South China Sea and its enlightenment. Natural Gas Industry, 2014, 34(10):1-8.
[9] 黄保家, 王振峰, 梁刚.琼东南盆地深水区中央峡谷天然气来源及运聚模式.中国海上油气, 2014, 26(5):8-14. HUANG B J, WANG Z F, LIANG G. Natural gas source and migration-accumulation pattern in the central canyon, the deep water area, Qiongdongnan Basin. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2014, 26(5):8-14.
[10] 何家雄, 夏斌, 孙东山, 等.琼东南盆地油气成藏组合、运聚规律与勘探方向.石油勘探与开发, 2006, 33(1):53-58. HE J X, XIA B, SUN D S, et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation, migration and play targets in the Qiongdongnan Basin, South China Sea. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2006, 33(1):53-58.
[11] 李友川, 邓运华, 张功成, 等.南海北部第三系海相烃源岩.石油学报, 2011, 32(2):219-225. LI Y C, DENG Y H, ZHANG G C, et al. Tertiary marine source rocks in the northern South China Sea. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2011, 32(2):219-225.
[12] 赵民, 张晓宝, 吉利明, 等. 琼东南盆地构造演化特征及其对油气藏的控制浅析. 天然气地球科学, 2010, 21(3):494-502. ZHAO M, ZHANG X B, JI L M, et al. Characteristics of tectonic evolution in the Qiongdongnan Basin and brief discussion about its controlling on reservoirs. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2010, 21(3):494-502.
[13] 尚鲁宁, 吕大炜, 李增学, 等.琼东南盆地崖南凹陷崖城组辫状河三角洲沉积特征及油气地质意义.油气地质与采收率, 2013, 20(5):4-9. SHANG L N, LYU D W, LI Z X, et al. Depositional characteristics and petroleum geology significance of braided delta system in Yacheng Formation, Yanan Sag, Qiongdongnan Basin. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2013,20(5):4-9.
[14] 赵东娜, 朱筱敏, 林金成, 等.南海琼东南盆地崖13-1气田古近系陵水组海陆过渡带沉积特征及演化.古地理学报, 2014, 16(3):385-400. ZHAO D N, ZHU X M, LIN J C, et al. Sedimentary characteristics and evolution of transitional belt of the Paleogene Lingshui Formation in Ya13-1 Gasfield of Qiongdongnan Basin, South China Sea. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2014, 16(3):385-400.
[15] 林畅松, 夏庆龙, 施和生, 等.地貌演化、源-汇过程与盆地分析.地学前缘, 2015, 22(1):9-20. LIN C S, XIA Q L, SHI H S, et al. Geomorphological evolution, source to sink system and basin analysis. Earth Science Frontiers, 2015, 22(1):9-20.
[16] 林畅松, 刘景彦, 张英志, 等.构造活动盆地的层序地层与构造地层分析——以中国中、新生代构造活动湖盆分析为例. 地学前缘, 2005, 12(4):365-374. LIN C S, LIU J Y, ZHANG Y Z, et al. Sequence stratigraphy and tectonic-stratigraphic analysis of tectonically active basins:a case study on the Cenozoic Mesozoic lacustrine basins in China. Earth Science Frontiers, 2005, 12(4):365-374.
[17] 姜海健.北部湾盆地迈陈凹陷流沙港组层序地层与有利区带研究.北京:中国地质大学, 2009. JIANG H J. The analysis of the sequence stratigraphic and the favorable reservoir belts of Liushagang Formation in Maichen Depression of Beibu-Gulf Basin. Beijing:China University of Geosciences(Beijing), 2009.
[18] 康波, 解习农, 杜学斌, 等. 基于滨线轨迹的古水深定量计算新方法——以古近系沙三中段东营三角洲为例. 沉积学报, 2012, 30(3):443-450. KANG B, XIE X N, DU X B, et al. A new paleobathymetric approach based on shoreline trajectory:an example from Dongying delta in the third member of Paleogene Shahejie Formation. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2012, 30(3):443-450.
[19] 李学杰, 陈芳, 陈超云, 等.南海西部浮游有孔虫含量与水深关系定量研究.古地理学报, 2004, 6(4):442-447. LI X J, CHEN F, CHEN C Y, et al. Quantitative research on relationship between planktonic foraminifera content and water depth in western South China Sea. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2004, 6(4):442-447.
[20] ZWAAN G J, JORISSEN F J, STIGTER H C. The depth dependency of planktonic/benthic foraminiferal ratios:constraints and applications. Marine Geology, 1990, 95(1):1-16.
[21] 王家豪, 王华, 赵忠新, 等.层序地层学应用于古地貌分析——以塔河油田为例.地球科学——中国地质大学学报, 2003, 28(4):425-430. WANG J H, WANG H, ZHAO Z X, et al. Sequence stratigraphy in paleogeomorphy analysis:an example from Tahe Oilfield. Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences, 2003, 28(4):425-430.
[22] 蔡佳.琼东南盆地古近系古地貌恢复及其对层序样式和沉积特征的控制.武汉:中国地质大学, 2009. CAI J. Paleo-morphologic restoration of Paleogene in Qiongdongnan Basin and its control on sequence architecture and sedimentary characteristics. Wuhan:China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), 2009.
[23] 石广仁. 油气盆地数值模拟方法. 3版. 北京:石油工业出版社, 2004:18-57. SHI G R. Numerical methods of petroliferous basin modeling. 3rd ed. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2004:18-57.
[24] 李绪宣, 刘宝明, 赵俊青.琼东南盆地古近纪层序结构、充填样式及生烃潜力.中国海上油气, 2007, 19(4):217-223. LI X X, LIU B M, ZHAO J Q. Paleogene sequence configuration, depositional filling pattern and hydrocarbon-generation potential in Qiongdongnan Basin. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2007, 19(4):217-223.
[25] 蔡佳, 王华.琼东南盆地陵水组层序格架及沉积体系的时空配置关系.海洋石油, 2011, 31(1):16-21. CAI J, WANG H. Paleogene sequence configuration, depositional filling pattern and hydrocarbon-generation potential in Qiongdongnan Basin. China Offshore Oil & Gas, 2011, 31(1):16-21.
[26] 魏魁生, 崔旱云, 叶淑芬, 等.琼东南盆地高精度层序地层学研究.地球科学——中国地质大学学报, 2001, 26(1):59-66. WEI K S, CUI H Y, YE S F, et al. High-precision sequence stratigraphy in Qiongdongnan Basin. Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences, 2001, 26(1):59-66.
[27] 廖计华, 王华, 肖军, 等.琼东南盆地古近纪幕式裂陷及构造、层序和沉积的综合响应过程.吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2012, 42(4):970-983. LIAO J H, WANG H, XIAO J, et al. Episodic rifting and integrated response process of tectonic, sequence stratigraphy and sedimentary filling in Paleogene of QiongdongnanBasin, South China Sea. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2012, 42(4):970-983.
[28] 蔡国富, 邵磊, 乔培军, 等.琼东南盆地古近纪海侵及沉积环境演化.石油学报, 2013, 34(增刊2):92-101. CAI G F, SHAO L, QIAO P J, et al. Marine transgression and evolution of depositional environment in the Paleogene strata of Qiongdongnan Basin, South China Sea. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013(Suppl 2):91-101.
[29] 纪友亮, 冯建辉.东濮凹陷古近系的低位三角洲沉积.石油勘探与开发, 2003, 30(l):112-114. JI Y L, FENG J H. Lowstand delta sedimentary of Paleogene in Dongpu Sag. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2003, 30(1):112-114.
[1] 尹兴平, 蒋裕强, 付永红, 张雪梅, 雷治安, 陈超, 张海杰. 渝西地区五峰组—龙马溪组龙一1亚段页岩岩相及储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 41-51.
[2] 张汶, 吕世聪, 赵大林, 贾海松, 蔡越钎. 渤海湾盆地西南部古近系滩坝沉积特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 85-94.
[3] 黄华, 袁娟梅, 彭伟, 张亮, 文辉. 江汉盆地古近系潜江组盐湖沉积特征与成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 9-16.
[4] 黄芸, 杨德相, 李玉帮, 胡明毅, 季汉成, 樊杰, 张晓芳, 王元杰. 冀中坳陷杨税务奥陶系深潜山储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 70-80.
[5] 向巧维, 李小平, 丁琳, 杜家元. 珠江口盆地珠一坳陷古近系高自然伽马砂岩形成机制及油气地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 93-103.
[6] 王立辉, 夏惠芬, 韩培慧, 曹瑞波, 孙先达, 张思琪. 剩余油分布的微观特征及其可动用程度的定量表征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 147-154.
[7] 庞小军, 王清斌, 解婷, 赵梦, 冯冲. 黄河口凹陷北缘古近系物源及其对优质储层的控制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 1-13.
[8] 田清华, 刘俊, 张晨, 王文胜, 黄丹. 苏里格气田下古生界储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 33-42.
[9] 段治有, 李贤庆, 陈纯芳, 马立元, 罗源. 杭锦旗地区J58井区下石盒子组气水分布及其控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(3): 45-54.
[10] 刘恭利, 韩自军, 段新意, 甄宗玉. 薄互层火成岩地震响应特征及厚度预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(3): 105-112.
[11] 王良军. 川北地区灯影组四段优质储层特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(2): 35-45.
[12] 孟凡洋, 陈科, 包书景, 李浩涵, 张聪, 王劲铸. 湘西北复杂构造区下寒武统页岩含气性及主控因素分析——以慈页1井为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(5): 29-39.
[13] 姚泾利, 李勇, 陈世加, 邱雯, 苏恺明, 何清波. 定边—吴起地区长61储层特征及其对含油性的控制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(4): 56-64.
[14] 杨有星, 金振奎, 白忠凯, 高永进, 韩淼, 张金虎. 辫状河单河道砂体接触关系及主控因素分析——以新疆克拉玛依,山西柳林、大同和陕西延安辫状河露头为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(2): 30-38.
[15] 时瑞坤, 高秋菊, 韩小锋, 巴素玉, 师涛, 韩敏. 车镇凹陷沙二段滩坝砂体沉积特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(2): 50-57.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨秋莲, 李爱琴, 孙燕妮, 崔攀峰. 超低渗储层分类方法探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 51 -56 .
[2] 张杰, 赵玉华. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组地震层序地层研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 71 -74 .
[3] 杨占龙, 张正刚, 陈启林, 郭精义,沙雪梅, 刘文粟. 利用地震信息评价陆相盆地岩性圈闭的关键点分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 57 -63 .
[4] 朱小燕, 李爱琴, 段晓晨, 田随良, 刘美荣. 镇北油田延长组长3 油层组精细地层划分与对比[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 82 -86 .
[5] 方朝合, 王义凤, 郑德温, 葛稚新. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系烃源岩显微组分分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 87 -90 .
[6] 韩春元,赵贤正,金凤鸣,王权,李先平,王素卿. 二连盆地地层岩性油藏“多元控砂—四元成藏—主元富集”与勘探实践(IV)——勘探实践[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 15 -20 .
[7] 戴朝成,郑荣才,文华国,张小兵. 辽东湾盆地旅大地区古近系层序—岩相古地理编图[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 39 -46 .
[8] 尹艳树,张尚峰,尹太举. 钟市油田潜江组含盐层系高分辨率层序地层格架及砂体分布规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 53 -58 .
[9] 石雪峰,杜海峰. 姬塬地区长3—长4+5油层组沉积相研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 59 -63 .
[10] 严世邦,胡望水,李瑞升,关键,李涛,聂晓红. 准噶尔盆地红车断裂带同生逆冲断裂特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 64 -68 .