岩性油气藏 ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (2): 87–98.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2017.02.011

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

二连盆地巴音都兰凹陷阿尔善组云质岩储层特征

孙书洋1,2, 朱筱敏1,2, 魏巍1,2, 朱世发1,2, 何明薇1,2, 刘伟1,2, 吴健平3   

  1. 1. 中国石油大学(北京)地球科学学院, 北京 102249;
    2. 中国石油大学(北京)油气资源与探测国家重点实验室, 北京 102249;
    3. 中国石油华北油田分公司 勘探开发研究院, 河北 任丘 062552
  • 收稿日期:2016-12-12 修回日期:2017-02-04 出版日期:2017-03-21 发布日期:2017-03-21
  • 通讯作者: 朱筱敏(1960-),男,博士,教授,主要从事沉积储层和层序地层学研究。Email:xmzhu@cup.edu.cn。
  • 作者简介:孙书洋(1990-),男,中国石油大学(北京)在读硕士研究生,研究方向为沉积学与储层地质学研究。地址:(100249)北京市昌区府学路18号中国石油大学(北京)地球科学学院。Email:sysun_cup@outlook.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重大科技专项“岩性地层油气藏沉积体系、储层形成机理与分布研究”(编号:2011ZX05001-002)和中国石油华北油田项目“二连盆地特殊岩类储集层特征及其成因机制研究”(编号:HBYT-YJY-2014-JS-307)联合资助

Characteristics of dolomitic reservoirs of A'ershan Formation in Bayindulan Sag,Erlian Basin

SUN Shuyang1,2, ZHU Xiaomin1,2, WEI Wei1,2, ZHU Shifa1,2, HE Mingwei1,2, LIU Wei1,2, WU Jianping3   

  1. 1. College of Geoscience, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China;
    2. State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China;
    3. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Huabei Oilfield Company, Renqiu 062552, Hebei, China
  • Received:2016-12-12 Revised:2017-02-04 Online:2017-03-21 Published:2017-03-21

摘要: 为研究巴音都兰凹陷下白垩统阿尔善组富油气云质岩储层特征,利用岩心、铸体薄片、阴极发光薄片、扫描电镜及X射线衍射等资料,对阿尔善组云质岩储层的岩性分类、储集空间类型、物性特征和成岩作用进行了研究。结果表明:阿尔善组云质岩储层主要分为两大类,即云质泥岩和云质砂岩,二者还可根据(铁)白云石的产状进一步细分。云质泥岩主要发育溶蚀孔隙、裂缝和晶间孔隙,孔隙度为4.4%~36.4%,平均为16.01%,渗透率为0.01~26.30 mD,平均为1.92 mD;云质砂岩主要发育溶蚀孔隙,孔隙度为1.1%~33.7%,平均为16.07%,渗透率为0.01~5 163.00 mD,平均为79.72 mD。云质泥岩以交代和溶蚀作用为主,成岩序列为:(铁)白云石的形成→有机酸生成→(铁)白云石的溶蚀;云质砂岩以溶蚀、胶结和交代作用为主,成岩序列为:轻度压实→石英次生加大→(铁)白云石胶结、交代→有机酸生成→(铁)白云石和长石的溶蚀。因此,研究云质岩储层特征对该区阿尔善组油气勘探具有重要意义。

Abstract: A set of dolomitic reservoir developed in the Lower cretaceous A'ershan Formation of Bayindulan Sag,Erlian Basin. Based on the data of cores,cast thin sections,petrography,cathodoluminescence,SEM and Xray diffraction,the lithologies,reservoir spaces types,physical properties and diagenesis of the dolomitic reservoirs were studied. The result shows that the dolomitic reservoirs of A'ershan Formation can be divided into two types in lithology:dolomitic sandstone and dolomitic mudstone,and these two types of lithology can be divided into more types according to the occurrence of dolomite or ankerite. The dolomitic mudstone developed dissolved pores,fractures and intracrystalline pores. The porosity of dolomitic mudstone is 4.4%-36.4%,with an average of 16.01%,and the permeability is 0.01-26.30mD,with an average of 1.92 mD. The main reservoir spaces developed in dolomitic sandstone are dissolved pores. The porosity of dolomitic sandstone is 1.1%-33.7%,with an average of 16.07%,and the permeability is 0.01-5 163.00 mD,with an average of 79.72 mD. Replacement and dissolution are the main diagenesis types developed in dolomitic mudstone,and the diagenesis sequence is the formation of dolomite and ankerite→organic acid generation→dolomite dissolution. The main diagenesis types of dolomitic sandstone include dissolution,cementation and replacement, and the diagenesis sequence is:slight compaction→ quartz secondary overgrowth→cementation of dolomite and ankerite→organic acid generation→dissolution of dolomite,ankerite and feldspar.

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2+3
[1] 朱世发,朱筱敏,陶文芳,等. 准噶尔盆地乌夏地区二叠系风 城组云质岩类成因研究.高校地质学报,2013,19(1):38-45. ZHU S F,ZHU X M,TAOWF,et al. Origin of dolomitic reservoir rock in the Permian Fengcheng Formation in Wu-Xia area of the Junggar Basin. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2013,19(1):38-45.
[2] 王会来,高先志,杨德相,等. 二连盆地巴音都兰凹陷下白垩 统湖相云质岩成因研究.沉积学报,2014,32(3):560-567. WANG H L,GAO X Z,YANG D X,et al. Genesis of dolomitic rock within the Lower Cretaceous lacustrine facies in Bayindulan Sag,Erlian Basin. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2014,32 (3):560-567.
[3] 张杰,何周,徐怀宝,等. 乌尔禾—风城地区二叠系白云质岩 类岩石学特征及成因分析. 沉积学报,2012,30(5):859-867. ZHANG J,HE Z,XU H B,et al. Petrological characteristics and origin of Permian Fengcheng Formation dolomitic rocks in Wuerhe-Fengcheng area,Junggar Basin. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2012,30(5):859-867.
[4] 王会来,高先志,杨德相,等. 二连盆地下白垩统湖相云质岩 分布及控制因素. 现代地质,2014,28(1):163-172. WANG H L,GAO X Z,YANG D X,et al. Distribution characteristics and controlling factors of the Lower Cretaceous lacustrine dolomitic rock in Erlian Basin. Geoscience,2014,28(1): 163-172.
[5] 刘英辉,朱筱敏,朱茂,等. 准噶尔盆地乌—夏地区二叠系风 城组致密油储层特征.岩性油气藏,2014,26(4):66-72. LIU Y H,ZHU X M,ZHU M,et al. Characteristics of tight oil reservoirs of the Permian Fengcheng Formation inWu-Xia area, Junggar Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs,2014,26(4):66-72.
[6] 杜金虎. 二连盆地隐蔽油藏勘探. 北京:石油工业出版社, 2003. DU J H. Exploration of subtle oil reservoirs in Erlian Basin. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2003.
[7] 任战利,刘池阳,冯建辉,等. 二连盆地巴音都兰凹陷热演化 史研究. 石油学报,2000,21(4):42-45. REN Z L,LIU C Y,FENG J H,et al. Research on geothermal history of Bayindulan Depression in Erlian Basin. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2000,21(4):42-45.
[8] 祝玉衡,张文朝. 二连盆地下白垩统沉积相及含油性. 北京: 科学出版社,2000. ZHU Y H,ZHANG W Z. Sedimentary facies and hydrocarbonbearing of Lower Cretaceous strata in Erlian Basin. Beijing: Science Press,2000.
[9] 崔周旗,吴健平,李莉,等. 二连盆地巴音都兰凹陷早白垩世 构造岩相带特征及含油性. 古地理学报,2001,3(1):25-34. CUI Z Q,WU J P,LI L,et al. Structure-petrographical zonations and their oil-bearing properties of the Early Cretaceous in Bayindulan Sag,Erlian Basin. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2001,3(1):25-34.
[10] 朱筱敏.沉积岩石学. 北京:石油工业出版社,2008. ZHU X M. Sedimentary petrology. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2008.
[11] 吴岚,唐瑾,付亮亮,等. 巴音都兰凹陷沉积火山碎屑岩油藏 储层特征研究.内蒙古石油化工,2012(4):113-115. WUL,TANG J,FU L L,et al. Research on characteristics of sedimentary pyroclastic reservoir in Bayindulan Sag. Inner Mongolia Petrochemical Industry,2012(4):113-115.
[12] 陈彦君,张超文,孙臣,等. 二连盆地白云岩和阿三段成藏条 件研究. 长江大学学报(自科版),2013,10(16):37-39. CHEN Y J,ZHANG C W,SUN C,et al. Research on dolomite and reservoir forming conditions of Asan member in Erlian Basin. Journal of Yangtze University(Natural Science Edition), 2013,10(16):37-39.
[13] ZHU S,ZHU X,NIU H,et al. Genetic mechanism of dolomitization in Fengcheng Formation in the Wu-Xia area of Junggar Basin,China. Acta Geologica Sinica(English Edition),2012, 86(2):447-461.
[14] 张静,胡见义,罗平,等. 深埋优质白云岩储集层发育的主控 因素与勘探意义. 石油勘探与开发,2010,37(2):203-210. ZHANG J,HU J Y,LUO P,et al. Master control factors of deep high-quality dolomite reservoirs and the exploration significance. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2010,37 (2):203-210.
[15] RONCHI P,MASETTI D,TASSAN S,et al. Hydrothermal dolomitization in platform and basin carbonate successions during thrusting:a hydrocarbon reservoir analogue(Mesozoic of Venetian Southern Alps,Italy). Applied Mechanics & Materials, 2012,29(1):68-89.
[16] 葛家旺,秦成岗,朱筱敏,等. 惠州凹陷HZ25-7 构造带文昌组 低孔低渗砂岩储层特征和成因机理. 岩性油气藏,2014,26 (4):36-43. GE J W,QIN C G,ZHU X M,et al. Characteristics and origin of low porosity and low permeability sandstone reservoir of Wenchang Formation in HZ25-7 structural belt of Huizhou Depression. Lithologic Reservoirs,2014,26(4):36-43.
[17] 姜在兴.沉积学.2 版. 北京:石油工业出版社,2003:292. JIANG Z X. Sedimentology. 2nd ed. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2003:292.
[18] 魏巍,朱筱敏,国殿斌,等. 银—额盆地查干凹陷下白垩统碎 屑岩储层成岩作用及其对储层物性的影响. 天然气地球科 学,2014,25(12):1933-1942. WEI W,ZHU X M,GUO D B,et al. Diagenesis and its controls on reservoir quality of Lower Cretaceous clastic rock reservoir in Chagan Depression of Yin-E Basin. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2014,25(12):1933-1942.
[19] 黄思静.碳酸盐岩的成岩作用. 北京:地质出版社,2010. HUANG S J. Diagenesis of carbonate. Beijing:Geology Press, 2010.
[20] 郑荣才,文华国,范铭涛,等. 酒西盆地下沟组湖相白烟型喷 流岩岩石学特征. 岩石学报,2006,22(12):3027-3038. ZHENG R C,WEN H G,FAN M T,et al. Lithological characteristics of sublacustrine white smoke type exhalative rock of the Xiagou Formation in Jiuxi Basin. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2006,22(12):3027-3038.
[21] 文华国,郑荣才,Qing HaiRuo,等. 青藏高原北缘酒泉盆地青 西凹陷白垩系湖相热水沉积原生白云岩. 中国科学(D辑:地 球科学),2014,44(4):591-604. WEN H G,ZHENG R C,QING H R,et al. Primary dolostone related to the Cretaceous lacustrine hydrothermal sedimentation in Qingxi Sag,Jiuquan Basin on the northern Tibetan Plateau. Science in China(Series D:Earth Sciences)2014,44(4):591-604.
[22] ZHU S F,ZHU X M,LIU X,et al. Authigenic minerals and diagenetic evolution in altered volcanic materials and their impacts on hydrocarbon reservoirs:evidence from the Lower Permian in the northwestern margin of Junggar Basin,China. Arabian Journal of Geosciences,2016,9(2):1-19.
[23] 朱筱敏,米立军,钟大康,等. 济阳坳陷古近系成岩作用及其 对储层质量的影响.古地理学报,2006,8(3):295-305. ZHU X M,MI L J,ZHONG D K,et al. Paleogene diagenesis and its control on reservoir quality in Jiyang Depression. Journal of Palaeogeography,2006,8(3):295-305.
[24] 钟大康,朱筱敏,李树静,等. 早期碳酸盐胶结作用对砂岩孔 隙演化的影响.沉积学报,2007,25(6):885-890. ZHONG D K,ZHU X M,LI S J,et al. Influence of early carbonate cementation on the evolution of sandstones. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2007,25(6):885-890.
[25] 王伟力,高海仁. 鄂尔多斯盆地中东部致密砂岩储层地质特 征及控制因素.岩性油气藏,2013,25(6):71-78. WANG W L,GAO H R. Geologic characteristics and controlling factors of tight sand reservoir in the mid-eastern Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs,2013,25(6):71-78.
[26] 邱隆伟,姜在兴,操应长,等. 泌阳凹陷碱性成岩作用及其对 储层的影响. 中国科学(D辑:地球科学),2001,31(9):752-759. QIU LW,JIANG Z X,CAO Y C. Influence of alkaline diagenesis on reservoir in Biyang Depression. Science in China(Series D:Earth Sciences)2001,31(9):752-759.
[27] 任战利,冯建辉,刘池洋,等.巴音都兰凹陷烃源岩有机地球化 学特征. 西北大学学报(自然科学版),2000,30(4):328-331. REN Z L,FENG J H,LIU C Y,et al. Organic geochemical feature of Lower Cretaceous source rock in Bayindulan Depression of Erlian Basin. Journal of Northwest University(Natural Science Edition),2000,30(4):328-331.
[28] 祝海华,钟大康,姚泾利,等. 碱性环境成岩作用及对储集层 孔隙的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地长7 段致密砂岩为例. 石油 勘探与开发,2015,42(1):51-59. ZHU H H,ZHONG D K,YAO J L,et al. Alkaline diagenesis and its effects on reservoir porosity:A case study of Upper Triassic Chang 7 tight sandstones in Ordos Basin,NW China. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2015,42(1):51-59.
[1] 芦凤明, 蔡明俊, 张阳, 倪天禄, 萧希航. 碎屑岩储层构型分级方案与研究方法探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 1-11.
[2] 王朋, 孙灵辉, 王核, 李自安. 鄂尔多斯盆地吴起地区延长组长6储层特征及其控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5): 63-72.
[3] 黄杰, 杜玉洪, 王红梅, 郭佳, 单晓琨, 苗雪, 钟新宇, 朱玉双. 特低渗储层微观孔隙结构与可动流体赋存特征——以二连盆地阿尔凹陷腾一下段储层为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5): 93-101.
[4] 田清华, 刘俊, 张晨, 王文胜, 黄丹. 苏里格气田下古生界储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 33-42.
[5] 郭艳琴, 何子琼, 郭彬程, 惠磊, 蔡志成, 王美霞, 李文厚, 李百强. 苏里格气田东南部盒8段致密砂岩储层特征及评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(5): 1-11.
[6] 李晓, 李闽, 陈猛, 唐雁冰. 法国巴黎盆地枫丹白露砂岩电性响应特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(1): 130-138.
[7] 李闽, 王浩, 陈猛. 致密砂岩储层可动流体分布及影响因素研究——以吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(1): 140-149.
[8] 赵习森, 党海龙, 庞振宇, 时丕同, 曹尚, 丁磊, 白璞. 特低渗储层不同孔隙组合类型的微观孔隙结构及渗流特征——以甘谷驿油田唐157井区长6储层为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(6): 8-14.
[9] 刘再振, 刘玉明, 李洋冰, 柳雪青, 王月胜, 王海燕. 鄂尔多斯盆地神府地区太原组致密砂岩储层特征及成岩演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(6): 51-59.
[10] 周晓峰, 丁黎, 杨卫国, 宋鹏, 于均民. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长8油层组砂岩中绿泥石膜的生长模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(4): 1-10.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 魏钦廉, 郑荣才, 肖玲, 王成玉, 牛小兵. 鄂尔多斯盆地吴旗地区长6 储层特征及影响因素分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 45 -50 .
[2] 王东琪, 殷代印. 水驱油藏相对渗透率曲线经验公式研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(3): 159 -164 .
[3] 李云,时志强. 四川盆地中部须家河组致密砂岩储层流体包裹体研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 27 -32 .
[4] 蒋韧,樊太亮,徐守礼. 地震地貌学概念与分析技术[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 33 -38 .
[5] 邹明亮,黄思静,胡作维,冯文立,刘昊年. 西湖凹陷平湖组砂岩中碳酸盐胶结物形成机制及其对储层质量的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 47 -52 .
[6] 王冰洁,何生,倪军娥,方度. 板桥凹陷钱圈地区主干断裂活动性分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 75 -82 .
[7] 陈振标,张超谟,张占松,令狐松,孙宝佃. 利用NMRT2谱分布研究储层岩石孔隙分形结构[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 105 -110 .
[8] 张厚福,徐兆辉. 从油气藏研究的历史论地层-岩性油气藏勘探[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 114 -123 .
[9] 张 霞. 勘探创造力的培养[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 16 -20 .
[10] 杨午阳, 杨文采, 刘全新, 王西文. 三维F-X域粘弹性波动方程保幅偏移方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 86 -91 .