岩性油气藏 ›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (2): 33–42.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20200204

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

苏里格气田下古生界储层特征及主控因素

田清华1, 刘俊2, 张晨1, 王文胜1, 黄丹1   

  1. 1. 中国石油长庆油田分公司 勘探开发研究院, 西安 710018;
    2. 中国石油长庆油田分公司 第四采气厂, 西安 710021
  • 收稿日期:2019-08-22 修回日期:2019-11-02 出版日期:2020-03-21 发布日期:2020-01-19
  • 作者简介:田清华(1987-),女,硕士,工程师,主要从事气田开发方面的地质研究工作。地址:(710018)陕西省西安市未央区长庆兴隆园小区勘探开发研究院。Email:tqh1_cq@petrochina.com.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技重大专项“鄂尔多斯盆地大型低渗透岩性地层油气藏开发示范工程”（编号：2016ZX05050）资助

Characteristics and controlling factors of Lower Paleozoic reservoir in Sulige Gas Field

TIAN Qinghua1, LIU Jun2, ZHANG Chen1, WANG Wensheng1, HUANG Dan1   

  1. 1. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Xi'an 710018, China;
    2. No.4 Gas Production Plant, PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Xi'an 710021, China
  • Received:2019-08-22 Revised:2019-11-02 Online:2020-03-21 Published:2020-01-19

PDF (PC)

361

摘要： 苏里格气田下古生界马家沟组储层目前已成为该气田稳产的有力支撑，分析其储层特征及控制因素对维持气田稳产具有重大意义。利用岩心观察、薄片鉴定、阴极发光等资料，系统分析了马家沟组主力储层特征。研究表明：马家沟组储层以颗粒白云岩、晶粒白云岩和微生物岩为主，储集空间主要为晶间孔、晶间溶孔、膏模孔、小型溶蚀孔洞及粒间孔等；储层展布主要受控于岩溶作用及古地貌分布，加里东期表生岩溶作用对储层改善贡献不大，甚至是一种破坏作用；岩溶古地貌高部位主要受表生岩溶作用的影响，对储层的储集空间和连通性有一定的改造作用，使储层物性较好，单井产气量高，而岩溶古地貌低部位主要受准同生期岩溶作用的影响，物性相对较差，单井产气量低。该研究成果可为苏里格气田下古生界气藏的有利区预测提供地质依据。

关键词: 储层特征, 控制因素, 下古生界, 苏里格气田

Abstract: The reservoir of Lower Paleozoic Majiagou Formation in Sulige Gas Field has become a strong support for stable production of the gas field. It is of great significance to analyze the reservoir characteristics and control factors for maintaining stable production of the gas field. The main reservoir characteristics of Majiagou Formation were analyzed by means of core observation,thin section identification and cathodoluminescence. The results show that the reservoir of Majiagou Formation is mainly granular crystalline dolomite,grain crystalline dolomite and microbiological rock. The reservoir pores are mainly intercrystalline pore,intercrystalline dissolved pore,gypsum mould pore,miniature dissolved holes,intergranular pores. Reservoir distribution is mainly controlled by karstification and paleogeomorphic distribution. Epidiagenetic karstification in the Caledonian period has little contribution to the reservoir,even a destructive effect. The high part of karst palaeogeomorphology is mainly affected by epidiagenetic karstification,which has a certain transformation effect on the reservoir space and connectivity,resulting in better reservoir physical properties and high gas production per well,while the low part of karst palaeogeomorphology is mainly affected by the karstification in the quasi-contemporaneous period, with relatively poor physical properties and low gas production per well. The research results can provide geological basis for the prediction of favorable areas of Lower Paleozoic gas reservoirs in Sulige Gas Field.

Key words: reservoir characteristics, controlling factors, Lower Paleozoic, Sulige Gas Field

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2+3
[1] 王若谷, 廖友运, 尚婷, 等.苏里格气田东二区山西组砂岩储层特征及主控因素分析. 西安科技大学学报, 2016, 36(3):385-392. WANG R G, LIAO Y Y, SHANG T, et al. Controlling factors and characteristics of sandstone reservoir of Shanxi Formation in the East Ⅱ block of Sulige Gas Field. Journal of Xi'an University of Science and Technology, 2016, 36(3):385-392.
[2] 汪洋, 李树同, 牟炜卫, 等.乌审旗-志丹地区奥陶系岩溶古地貌与马五41气水分布关系.岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(2):64-71. WANG Y, LI S T, MOU W W, et al. Effect of karst paleogeomorphology of Ordovician on gas-water distribution of Ma 541 in Wushenqi-Zhidan area. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(2):64-71.
[3] 夏日元, 唐健生, 关碧珠, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地奥陶系古岩溶地貌及天然气富集特征.石油与天然气地质, 1999, 20(2):133-136. XIA R Y, TANG J S, GUAN B Z, et al. Ordovician palaeokarst landform in ordos basin and gas enrichment characteristics. Oil & Gas Geology, 1999, 20(2):133-136.
[4] 郭彦如, 付金华, 魏新善, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地奥陶系碳酸盐岩成藏特征与模式.石油勘探与开发, 2014, 41(4):393-403. GUO Y R, FU J H, WEI X S, et al. Natural gas accumulation and models in Ordovician carbonates, Ordos Basin, China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(4):393-403.
[5] 李维, 张军涛, 朱筱敏, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地富县地区马五段白云岩储层特征与演化.岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(3):58-67. LI W, ZHANG J T, ZHU X M, et al. Characteristics and evolution of the Ordovician dolomite reservoir of Ma 5 member in Fuxian area, Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(3):58-67.
[6] 魏新善, 陈娟萍, 张道锋, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地东部大面积致密碳酸盐岩气地质特征及成藏条件分析. 天然气地球科学, 2017; 28(5):677-686. WEI X S, CHEN J P, ZHANG D F, et al. Geological characteristics and reservoir forming area tight carbonate gas in eastern Ordos's conditions of large Basin. China Natural Gas Geoscience, 2017, 28(5):677-686.
[7] 张庄, 杨西燕, 董兆雄.鄂尔多斯盆地马家沟组中组合马五5亚段白云岩特征及成因机理. 海相油气地质, 2016, 21(2):65-71. ZHANG Z, YANG X Y, DONG Z X. Characteristics and genesis of Ordovician Majiagou submember-55 dolostone in middle assemblage, Ordos Basin. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2016, 21(2):65-71.
[8] 张宁宁.苏里格中区T34-S470区块马五段储层特征研究.西安:西安石油大学, 2015. ZHANG N N. Study on the reservoir characteristics of the may member of block T43-S470 well area in Sulige middle area. Xi'an:Xi'an Shiyou University, 2015.
[9] 蒋传杰, 杜孝华, 张浩, 等.苏里格气田东区下奥陶统马五5亚段白云岩成因.新疆石油地质, 2017, 38(1):41-48. JIANG C J, DU X H, ZHANG H, et al. Genesis of dolomite in the Lower Ordovician Ma-55 sub-member in eastern area of Sulige Gas Field. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2017, 38(1):41-48.
[10] 孙玉景, 周立发.鄂尔多斯盆地马五段膏盐岩沉积对天然气成藏的影响.岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(6):67-75. SUN Y J, ZHOU L F. Influences of gypsum-salt deposition on gas accumulation of the fifth member of Majiagou Formation in Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(6):67-75.
[11] 李振宏, 郑聪斌.鄂尔多斯盆地东部奥陶系储层特征及控制因素.天然气地球科学, 2004, 15(6):604-609. LI Z H, ZHENG C B. The reservoir heterogeneity and controlled factors of Ordovician in the eastern Ordos Basin. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2004, 15(6):604-609.
[12] 周进高, 张帆, 郭庆新, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地下奥陶统马家沟组障壁潟湖沉积相模式及有利储层分布规律.沉积学报, 2011, 29(1):64-71. ZHOU J G, ZHANG F, GUO Q X, et al. Barrier-Lagoon sedimentary model and reservoir distribution regularity of LowerOrdovician Majiagou Formation in Ordos Basin.Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2011, 29(1):64-71.
[13] 李朋威, 罗平, 宋金民, 等.微生物碳酸盐岩储层特征与主控因素:以塔里木盆地西北缘上震旦统-下寒武统为例.石油学报, 2015, 36(9):1074-1089. LI P W, LUO P, SONG J M, et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors of microbial carbonate reservoirs:a case study of Upper Sinian-Lower Cambrian in northwestern margin of Tarim Basin. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(9):1074-1089.
[14] 罗平, 王石, 李朋威, 等.微生物碳酸盐岩油气储层研究现状与展望.沉积学报, 2013, 31(5):807-823. LUO P, WANG S, LI P W, et al. Review and prospectives of microbial carbonate reservoirs. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2013, 31(5):807-823.
[15] 李朋威, 金廷福, 王果谦, 等.微生物碳酸盐岩及其油气勘探意义.地质科技情报, 2013, 32(3):66-74. LI P W, JIN T F, WANG G Q, et al. Microbial carbonates and their significance in the petroleum exploration. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2013, 32(3):66-74.
[16] BURNE R V, MOORE L S. Microbialites:Organosedimentary deposits of bent-hic microbial communities. Palaios, 1987, 2:241-254.
[17] AWRAMIK S M. Precambrian columnar stromatolite diversity:Reflection of metazoan appearance. Sciences, 1971, 174:825-827.
[18] 张宝民, 刘静江.中国岩溶储集层分类与特征及相关的理论问题.石油勘探与开发, 2009, 36(1):12-29. ZHANG B M, LIU J J. Classification and characteristics of karst reservoirs in China and related theories. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2009, 36(1):12-29.
[19] 赵文智, 沈安江, 郑剑锋, 等.塔里木、四川及鄂尔多斯盆地白云岩储层孔隙成因探讨及对储层预测的指导意义. 中国科学:地球科学, 2014, 44(9):1925-1939. ZHAO W Z, SHEN A J, ZHENG J F, et al. The porosity origin of dolostone reservoirs in the Tarim,Sichuan and Ordos basins and its implication to reservoir prediction. Science China:Earth Sciences, 2014, 44(9):1925-1939.
[20] 沈安江, 赵文智, 胡安平, 等.海相碳酸盐岩储集层发育主控因素.石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42(5):545-554. SHEN A J, ZHAO W Z, HU A P, et al. Major factors controlling the development of marine carbonate reservoirs. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(5):545-554.
[21] 关新, 陈世加, 苏旺, 等.四川盆地西北部栖霞组碳酸盐岩储层特征及主控因素.岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(2):67-76. GUAN X, CHEN S J, SU W, et al. Carbonate reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors of Middle Permian Qixia Formation in NW Sichuan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(2):67-76.
[22] 谭秀成, 肖笛, 陈景山, 等.早成岩期喀斯特化研究新进展及意义.古地理学报, 2015, 17(4):441-456. TAN X C, XIAO D, CHEN J S, et al. New advance and enlightenment of eogenetic karstification. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2015, 17(4):441-456.
[23] 金民东, 曾伟, 谭秀成, 等.四川磨溪-高石梯地区龙王庙组滩控岩溶型储集层特征及控制因素.石油勘探与开发, 2014, 41(6):650-660. JIN M D, ZENG W, TAN X C, et al. Characteristics and controlling factors of beach-controlled karst reservoirs in Cambrian Longwangmiao Formation, Moxi-Gaoshiti area, Sichuan Basin, NW China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(6):650-660.
[24] 肖笛, 谭秀成, 郗爱华, 等.四川盆地南部中二叠统茅口组碳酸盐岩岩溶特征:古大陆环境下层控型早成岩期岩溶实例. 古地理学报, 2015, 17(4):457-476. XIAO D, TAN X C, XI A H, et al. Palaeokarst characteristics of carbonate rocks of the Middle Permian Maokou Formation in southern Sichuan Basin:Example of strata-bound eogenetic karst in palaeo-continental settings. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2015, 17(4):457-476.
[25] 唐浩, 谭秀成, 刘宏, 等.川中磨溪气田嘉陵江组"土黄色" 粉晶云岩成因及其储集层形成机制.石油勘探与开发, 2014, 41(4):504-512. TANG H, TAN X C, LIU H, et al. Genesis and dolomitization of "Khali" powder crystal dolomite in Triassic Jialingjiang Formation, Moxi Gas Field, central Sichuan Basin, SW China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(4):504-512.
[1] 尹兴平, 蒋裕强, 付永红, 张雪梅, 雷治安, 陈超, 张海杰. 渝西地区五峰组—龙马溪组龙一1亚段页岩岩相及储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 41-51.
[2] 李志远, 杨仁超, 张吉, 王一, 杨特波, 董亮. 天然气扩散散失率定量评价——以苏里格气田苏X区块为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 76-84.
[3] 马乔雨, 张欣, 张春雷, 周恒, 武中原. 基于一维卷积神经网络的横波速度预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 111-120.
[4] 李慧莉, 尤东华, 李建交, 谭广辉, 刘士林. 麦盖提斜坡北新1井吐依洛克组角砾岩储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 26-35.
[5] 严敏, 赵靖舟, 曹青, 吴和源, 黄延昭. 鄂尔多斯盆地临兴地区二叠系石盒子组储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 49-58.
[6] 龙盛芳, 王玉善, 李国良, 段传丽, 邵映明, 何咏梅, 陈凌云, 焦煦. 苏里格气田苏49区块盒8下亚段致密储层非均质性特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 59-69.
[7] 李祖兵, 崔俊峰, 宋舜尧, 成亚斌, 卢异, 陈岑. 黄骅坳陷北大港潜山中生界碎屑岩储层特征及成因机理[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 81-92.
[8] 张治恒, 田继军, 韩长城, 张文文, 邓守伟, 孙国祥. 吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 116-126.
[9] 袁纯, 张惠良, 王波. 大型辫状河三角洲砂体构型与储层特征——以库车坳陷北部阿合组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 73-84.
[10] 侯科锋, 李进步, 张吉, 王龙, 田敏. 苏里格致密砂岩气藏未动用储量评价及开发对策[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4): 115-125.
[11] 庞小军, 王清斌, 解婷, 赵梦, 冯冲. 黄河口凹陷北缘古近系物源及其对优质储层的控制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 1-13.
[12] 李宏涛, 马立元, 史云清, 胡向阳, 高君, 李浩. 基于井-震结合的水下分流河道砂岩储层展布分析与评价——以什邡气藏JP35砂组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 78-89.
[13] 赵超峰, 贾振甲, 田建涛, 高荣锦, 张伟, 赵建宇. 基于井中微地震监测方法的压裂效果评价——以吉林探区Y22井为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 161-168.
[14] 柳娜, 周兆华, 任大忠, 南珺祥, 刘登科, 杜堃. 致密砂岩气藏可动流体分布特征及其控制因素——以苏里格气田西区盒8段与山1段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(6): 14-25.
[15] 郭艳琴, 何子琼, 郭彬程, 惠磊, 蔡志成, 王美霞, 李文厚, 李百强. 苏里格气田东南部盒8段致密砂岩储层特征及评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(5): 1-11.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 旷红伟，高振中，王正允，王晓光. 一种独特的隐蔽油藏——夏9井区成岩圈闭油藏成因分析及其对勘探的启迪[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 8 -14 .
[2] 李国军, 郑荣才,唐玉林,汪洋,唐楷. 川东北地区飞仙关组层序- 岩相古地理特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 64 -70 .
[3] 蔡佳. 琼东南盆地长昌凹陷新近系三亚组沉积相[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(5): 46 -54 .
[4] 章惠, 关达, 向雪梅, 陈勇. 川东北元坝东部须四段裂缝型致密砂岩储层预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(1): 133 -139 .
[5] 付广，刘博，吕延防. 泥岩盖层对各种相态天然气封闭能力综合评价方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 21 -26 .
[6] 马中良，曾溅辉，张善文，王永诗，王洪玉，刘惠民. 砂岩透镜体油运移过程模拟及成藏主控因素分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 69 -74 .
[7] 王英民. 对层序地层学工业化应用中层序分级混乱问题的探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 9 -15 .
[8] 卫平生, 潘树新, 王建功, 雷　明. 湖岸线和岩性地层油气藏的关系研究 —— 论“坳陷盆地湖岸线控油”[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 27 -31 .
[9] 易定红, 石兰亭, 贾义蓉. 吉尔嘎朗图凹陷宝饶洼槽阿尔善组层序地层与隐蔽油藏[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 68 -72 .
[10] 杨占龙, 彭立才, 陈启林, 郭精义, 李在光, 黄云峰. 吐哈盆地胜北洼陷岩性油气藏成藏条件与油气勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 62 -67 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发