岩性油气藏 ›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (1): 86–96.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2018.01.009

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

小型断陷湖盆扇三角洲沉积特征与发育模式——以徐家围子断陷北部沙河子组为例

蔡全升1,2, 胡明毅2,3, 陈孝红1, 胡忠贵3   

  1. 1. 中国地质调查局武汉地质调查中心, 武汉 430205;
    2. 长江大学 油气资源与勘探技术教育部重点实验室, 武汉 430100;
    3. 长江大学 地球科学学院, 武汉 430100
  • 收稿日期:2017-08-10 修回日期:2017-11-13 出版日期:2018-01-21 发布日期:2018-01-21
  • 第一作者:蔡全升(1988-),男,博士,工程师,主要从事沉积地质与页岩气基础地质调查方面的研究工作。地址:(430205)湖北省武汉市东湖新技术开发区光谷大道69号中国地质调查局武汉地质调查中心。Email:cqsh0713@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家“十三五”重大科技专项“中国大型气田形成条件、富集规律及目标评价”(编号:2016ZX05007-002)和油气资源与勘探技术教育部重点实验室开放基金项目“松辽盆地强烈断陷期小型湖盆沉积充填演化及其对天然气富集区的控制”(编号:K2016-07)联合资助

Sedimentary characteristics and development model of fan delta in small faulted basin: a case of Shahezi Formation in northern Xujiaweizi Fault Depression,NE China

CAI Quansheng1,2, HU Mingyi2,3, CHEN Xiaohong1, HU Zhonggui3   

  1. 1. Wuhan Center of China Geological Survey, Wuhan 430205, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Exploration Technologies for Oil and Gas Resources, Yangtze University, Ministry of Education, Yangtze University, Wuhan 430100, China;
    3. School of Geosciences, Yangtze University, Wuhan 430100, China
  • Received:2017-08-10 Revised:2017-11-13 Online:2018-01-21 Published:2018-01-21

摘要: 为了深化小型断陷湖盆扇三角洲沉积地质认识,促进该类盆地油气勘探开发,以松辽盆地徐家围子北部沙河子组为研究对象,综合运用岩心、录井、测井以及地震资料对小型断陷湖盆扇三角洲沉积特征与发育模式进行了深入分析。结果表明:徐家围子北部沙河子组扇三角洲沉积发育,岩性以低成熟度的褐色、灰色砂砾岩和褐色、黑色泥岩为主,局部可见碳化泥岩;砂砾岩在测井曲线上多呈中幅齿状或齿化箱状,成像测井上常为暗色背景下大小不一的亮斑响应;在地震剖面上,扇三角洲沉积多表现为中低频楔状前积反射、丘状或楔状杂乱反射特征。平面分布特征显示,扇三角洲的发育与盆地范围以及构造特征均密切相关:沙河子组沉积初期,由于盆地范围小、沉积物供给充足且搬运距离短,扇三角洲沉积不仅发育于西部陡坡带,东部相对缓坡区同样发育;随着控盆断裂持续活动和盆地范围的扩大,东部缓坡带扇三角洲沉积逐渐向辫状河三角洲沉积转变,不同构造带上的沉积相开始出现分异,据此建立了强烈断陷期小型断陷湖盆扇三角洲的发育模式,可为类似小型断陷湖盆扇三角洲的油气勘探提供地质依据。

关键词: 天然气成因, 成藏期次, 成藏过程, 须家河组, 川南地区

Abstract: The geological knowledge of fan delta in small-scale faulted basins will be of important significance for oil & gas exploration. Taking Shahezi Formation in the northern Xujiaweizi Fault Depression as an example, the data of core,logging and seismic were used to study the sedimentary characteristics and development model of fan delta in a small faulted basin formed during the intensive rifting stage. The results show that fan delta develops in Shahezi Formation within the study area,and the sediments of fan delta are mainly composed of brown to grey sandy conglomerate with low maturity,brown and black mudstone,and locally distributed carbonized mudstone. On the logging curves,the sandy conglomerate appears as zigzag shape with medium amplitude and zigzag box;on the imaging logging profiles,the conglomerates with high content of argillaceous sediments appear as bright spots with different size on black background. Furthermore,according to well-seismic calibrating,the sediments of fan delta typically show sphenoid progradation reflections,moundy and sphenoid disorder reflections on seismic profiles. By the analysis of fan delta distribution in Shahezi Formation,it indicates that the development of fan delta is closely related to basin scope and tectonic features. During the early sedimentary stage of the Shahezi Formation,not only the west steep slope but also the east gentle slope was dominated by fan deltas due to the small scope of the basin and sufficient sediments with short transportation distance. However,with the continuous activity of basin-controlling fault and the extension of basin,the fan delta on east gentle slope was gradually replaced with braided delta,and the differentiation characteristics of sedimentary facies on different tectonic belts become obvious. According to these features above,the development model of fan delta in a small fault basin formed during the intensive rifting stage was proposed,which will be very important for the oil and gas exploration in similar basins.

Key words: natural gas genesis, accumulation stages, accumulation process, Xujiahe Formation, southern Sichuan Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE121.3
[1] 胡受权,颜其彬,张永贵.断陷湖盆陡坡带陆相层序体系域与油气藏成藏类型.石油勘探与开发,1999,26(1):13-17. HU S Q,YAN Q B,ZHANG Y G. Applying terrigenous sequence stratigraphy to prediction of hydrocarbon trap. Petroleum Exploration and Development,1999,26(1):13-17.
[2] 赵文智,方杰.不同类型断陷湖盆岩性-地层油气藏油气富集规律——以冀中坳陷和二连盆地岩性-地层油气藏对比为例. 石油勘探与开发,2007,34(2):129-134. ZHAO W Z,FANG J. Petroleum enrichment rules in lithologic and stratigraphic pools in different faulted basins:an example from the correlation of lithologic and stratigraphic pools in Jizhong Depression and in Erlian Basin. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2007,34(2):129-134.
[3] 曹刚,邹婧芸,曲全工,等.东营凹陷永1块沙四段砂砾岩体有效储层控制因素分析.岩性油气藏,2016,28(1):30-37. CAO G,ZOU J Y,QU Q G,et al. Controlling factors of effective reservoirs in glutenite body of the fourth member of Shahejie Formation in Yong 1 block,Dongying Sag. Lithologic Reservoirs,2016,28(1):30-37.
[4] 宋国奇,郝雪峰,刘克奇.箕状断陷盆地形成机制、沉积体系与成藏规律——以济阳坳陷为例.石油与天然气地质,2014, 35(3):303-310. SONG G Q,HAO X F,LIU K Q. Tectonic evolution,sedimentary system and petroleum distribution patterns in dustpanshaped rift basin:a case study from Jiyang Depression,Bohai Bay Basin. Oil & Gas Geology,2014,35(3):303-310.
[5] 闫建平,言语,李尊芝,等.砂砾岩储层物性演化及影响因素研究——以东营凹陷北部陡坡带为例.岩性油气藏,2016,28(2):1-6. YAN J P,YAN Y,LI Z Z,et al. Physical property evolution of glutenite reservoir and its influencing factors:a case study from northern steep slope zone in Dongying Sag. Lithologic Reservoirs,2016,28(2):1-6.
[6] 邹妞妞,张大权,钱海涛,等.准噶尔盆地玛北斜坡区扇三角洲砂砾岩储层主控因素.岩性油气藏,2016,28(4):24-33. ZOU N N,ZHANG D Q,QIAN H T,et al. Main controlling factors of glutenite reservoir of fan delta in Mabei slope,Junggar Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs,2016,28(4):24-33.
[7] 李占东,于鹏,邵碧莹,等.复杂断陷盆地沉积充填演化与构造活动的响应分析——以海拉尔-塔木察格盆地中部断陷带为例.中国矿业大学学报,2015,44(5):853-860. LI Z D,YU P,SHAO B Y,et al. Response analysis of sedimentary filling evolution and tectonic activity in complicated faulted basin:an example of middle rift belt in Hailar-Tamtsag Basin. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,2015,44(5):853-860.
[8] 吴冬,朱筱敏,李志,等. 苏丹Muglad盆地Fula凹陷白垩纪断陷期沉积模式.石油勘探与开发,2015,42(3):319-327. WU D,ZHU X M,LI Z,et al. Depositional models in Cretaceous rift stage of Fula Sag,Muglad Basin,Sudan. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2015,42(3):319-327.
[9] 于兴河,姜辉,李胜利,等.中国东部中、新生代陆相断陷盆地沉积充填模式及其控制因素——以济阳坳陷东营凹陷为例. 岩性油气藏,2007,19(1):39-45. YU X H,JIANG H,LI S L,et al. Depositional filling models and controlling factors on Mesozoic and Cenozoic fault basins of terrestrial facies in eastern China-a case study of Dongying Sag of Jiyang Depression. Lithologic Reservoirs,2007,19(1):39-45.
[10] 张有平,盛世锋,高祥录. 玛湖凹陷玛2井区下乌尔禾组扇三角洲沉积及有利储层分布. 岩性油气藏,2015,27(5):204-210. ZHANG Y P,SHENG S F,GAO X L. Fan delta sedimentation and favorable reservoir distribution of the lower Urho Formation in Ma 2 well block of Mahu Depression. Lithologic Reservoirs,2015,27(5):204-210.
[11] 赵泽辉,徐淑娟,姜晓华,等.松辽盆地深层地质结构及致密砂砾岩气勘探.石油勘探与开发,2016,43(1):12-23. ZHAO Z H,XU S J,JIANG X H,et al. Deep strata geologic structure and tight conglomerate gas exploration in Songliao Basin,east China. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2016, 43(1):13-23.
[12] 黄薇,杨步增,孙立东,等.松辽盆地北部深层断陷分布规律及勘探潜力.大庆石油地质与开发,2014,33(5):76-81. HUANG W,YANG B Z,SUN L D,et al. Distribution laws and exploratory potentials of the deep fault depressions in north Songliao Basin. Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing,2014,33(5):76-81.
[13] 王志宏,李建明,王延斌,等.徐家围子断陷沙河子组煤层发育特征及分布预测.中国煤炭地质,2015,27(1):13-17. WANG Z H,LI J M,WANG Y B,et al. Shahezi Formation coal seam development features and distribution prediction in Xujiaweizi Fault Depression. Coal Geology of China,2015,27(1):13-17.
[14] 吕鹏佶,柳成志,颜康,等.松辽盆地徐家围子断陷沙河子组地震相研究.地质与资源,2014,23(4):330-334. LYU P J,LIU C Z,YAN K,et al. Study on the seismic facies of the Shahezi Formation in Xujiaweizi Fault Depression in Songliao Basin. Geology and Resources,2014,23(4):330-334.
[15] 李娟,舒良树.松辽盆地中、新生代构造特征及其演化.南京大学学报(自然科学版),2002,38(4):525-531. LI J,SHU L S. Mesozoic-Cenozoic tectonic features and evolution of the Songliao Basin,NE China. Journal of Naijing University(Natural Sciences),2002,38(4):525-531.
[16] 王璞珺,赵然磊,蒙启安,等.白垩纪松辽盆地:从火山裂谷到陆内拗陷的动力学环境.地学前缘,2015,22(3):99-117. WANG P J,ZHAO R L,MENG Q A,et al. The Cretaceous Songliao Basin:Dynamic background from volcanic rift to interior sag basin. Earth Science Frontiers,2015,22(3):99-117.
[17] 张元高,陈树民,张尔华,等.徐家围子断陷构造地质特征研究新进展.岩石学报,2010,26(1):142-148. ZHANG Y G,CHEN S M,ZHANG E H,et al. The new progress of Xujiaweizi Fault Depression characteristics of structural geology research. Acta Petrologica Sinica,2010,26(1):42-148.
[18] 张尔华,姜传金,张元高,等.徐家围子断陷深层结构形成与演化的探讨.岩石学报,2010,26(1):149-157. ZHANG E H,JIANG C J,ZHANG Y G,et al. Study on the formation and evolution of deep structure of Xujiaweizi Fault Depression. Acta Petrologica Sinica,2010,26(1):149-157.
[19] 陈俊安,赵泽辉,江黎.松辽盆地徐家围子断陷沙河子组层序地层格架建立与模式研究.科学技术与工程,2014,14(10):183-190. CHEN J A,ZHAO Z H,JIANG L. The establishment of sequence stratigraphic framework and its models of the Shahezi Formation in Xujiaweizi Fault Depression,Songliao Basin. Science Technology and Engineering,2014,14(10):183-190.
[20] 范兴燕,张研,唐衔,等.断陷湖盆地震相模式研究要点——以Capella油田为例.石油地球物理勘探,2015,50(6):1196-1206. FAN X Y,ZHANG Y,TANG X,et al. Key research points on seismic facies models of faulted lake basin:a case study of Capella Oilfield. Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2015,50(6):1196-1206.
[21] 甘立琴,马世忠,赵辉.伊通盆地岔路河断陷奢岭组地震相研究.科学技术与工程,2013,13(2):428-433. GAN L Q,MA S Z,ZHAO H. Seismic facies of the Sheling Formation of the Chaluhe Depression in the Yitong Basin. Science Technology and Engineering,2013,13(2):428-433.
[22] 吕栋,戴胜群,李斐,等.断陷盆地前积地震相及其岩性地层油气藏发育规律——以彰武断陷九佛堂组为例. 断块油气田,2015,22(1):16-20. LYU D,DAI S Q,LI F,et al. Foreset facies and its development rule of litho-stratigraphic reservoirs in fault depression basin:taking Jiufotang Formation of Zhangwu Fault Depression Basin. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2015,22(1):16-20.
[23] 于兴河,瞿建华,谭程鹏,等.玛湖凹陷百口泉组扇三角洲砾岩岩相及成因模式.新疆石油地质,2014,35(6):619-627. YU X H,QU J H,TAN C P,et al. Conglomerate lithofacies and origin models of fan deltas of Baikouquan Formation in Mahu Sag,Junggar Basin. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2014,35(6):619-627.
[1] 屈卫华, 田野, 董常春, 郭小波, 李立立, 林斯雅, 薛松, 杨世和. 松辽盆地德惠断陷白垩系烃源岩特征及其控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 122-134.
[2] 薄尚尚, 田继先, 李曜良, 王晔桐, 王昊, 孙国强. 川东北地区上三叠统须家河组物源分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 99-112.
[3] 黄彦庆, 刘忠群, 王爱, 肖开华, 林恬, 金武军. 四川盆地元坝地区上三叠统须家河组三段致密砂岩气甜点类型与分布[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 21-30.
[4] 杨跃明, 张少敏, 金涛, 明盈, 郭蕊莹, 王兴志, 韩璐媛. 川南地区二叠系龙潭组页岩储层特征及勘探潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(1): 1-11.
[5] 苏亦晴, 杨威, 金惠, 王志宏, 崔俊峰, 朱秋影, 武雪琼, 白壮壮. 川西北地区三叠系须家河组深层储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(5): 86-99.
[6] 李博, 崔军平, 李莹, 李金森, 赵金, 陈彦武. 伊陕斜坡吴起地区延长组油气成藏期次分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(6): 21-28.
[7] 丛平, 闫建平, 井翠, 张家浩, 唐洪明, 王军, 耿斌, 王敏, 晁静. 页岩气储层可压裂性级别测井评价及展布特征——以川南X地区五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 177-188.
[8] 田光荣, 王建功, 孙秀建, 李红哲, 杨魏, 白亚东, 裴明利, 周飞, 司丹. 柴达木盆地阿尔金山前带侏罗系含油气系统成藏差异性及其主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 131-144.
[9] 卢恩俊, 柳少波, 于志超, 鲁雪松, 成定树. 柴达木盆地英雄岭南带断裂活动特征及其控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 161-174.
[10] 姚军, 乐幸福, 陈娟, 苏旺, 张永峰. 基于拟三维多属性反演的优质烃源岩分布预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 248-257.
[11] 高乔, 王兴志, 朱逸青, 赵圣贤, 张芮, 肖哲宇. 川南地区龙马溪组元素地球化学特征及有机质富集主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(4): 72-84.
[12] 郑珊珊, 刘洛夫, 汪洋, 罗泽华, 王曦蒙, 盛悦, 许同, 王柏寒. 川南地区五峰组—龙马溪组页岩微观孔隙结构特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(3): 55-65.
[13] 叶博, 梁晓伟, 宋娟, 曹润荣, 毛振华, 郝炳英. 鄂尔多斯盆地演武地区侏罗系延安组油藏成藏特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(4): 65-73.
[14] 王威. 川东北地区须家河组天然气高效成藏模式探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(3): 27-34.
[15] 陈居凯, 朱炎铭, 崔兆帮, 张闯辉. 川南龙马溪组页岩孔隙结构综合表征及其分形特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(1): 55-62.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 段天向, 刘晓梅, 张亚军, 肖述琴. Petrel 建模中的几点认识[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 102 -107 .
[2] 张立秋. 南二区东部二类油层上返层系组合优化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 116 -120 .
[3] 张娣,侯中健,王亚辉,王莹,王春联. 板桥—北大港地区沙河街组沙一段湖相碳酸盐岩沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(4): 92 -97 .
[4] 樊怀才,李晓平,窦天财,吴欣袁. 应力敏感效应的气井流量动态特征研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(4): 130 -134 .
[5] 田淑芳,张鸿文. 应用生命周期旋回理论预测辽河油田石油探明储量增长趋势[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 98 -100 .
[6] 杨凯,郭肖. 裂缝性低渗透油藏三维两相黑油数值模拟研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(3): 118 -121 .
[7] 翟中喜,秦伟军,郭金瑞. 油气充满度与储层通道渗流能力的定量关系———以泌阳凹陷双河油田岩性油藏为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(4): 92 -95 .
[8] 戚明辉,陆正元,袁帅,李新华. 塔河油田12 区块油藏水体来源及出水特征分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(4): 115 -119 .
[9] 李相博,陈启林,刘化清,完颜容,慕敬魁,廖建波,魏立花. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组3种沉积物重力流及其含油气性[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(3): 16 -21 .
[10] 刘云, 卢渊,伊向艺,张俊良,张锦良,王振喜. 天然气水合物预测模型及其影响因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(3): 124 -127 .