岩性油气藏 ›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (1): 86–96.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2018.01.009

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

小型断陷湖盆扇三角洲沉积特征与发育模式——以徐家围子断陷北部沙河子组为例

蔡全升1,2, 胡明毅2,3, 陈孝红1, 胡忠贵3   

  1. 1. 中国地质调查局武汉地质调查中心, 武汉 430205;
    2. 长江大学 油气资源与勘探技术教育部重点实验室, 武汉 430100;
    3. 长江大学 地球科学学院, 武汉 430100
  • 收稿日期:2017-08-10 修回日期:2017-11-13 出版日期:2018-01-21 发布日期:2018-01-21
  • 作者简介:蔡全升(1988-),男,博士,工程师,主要从事沉积地质与页岩气基础地质调查方面的研究工作。地址:(430205)湖北省武汉市东湖新技术开发区光谷大道69号中国地质调查局武汉地质调查中心。Email:cqsh0713@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家“十三五”重大科技专项“中国大型气田形成条件、富集规律及目标评价”（编号：2016ZX05007-002）和油气资源与勘探技术教育部重点实验室开放基金项目“松辽盆地强烈断陷期小型湖盆沉积充填演化及其对天然气富集区的控制”（编号：K2016-07）联合资助

Sedimentary characteristics and development model of fan delta in small faulted basin: a case of Shahezi Formation in northern Xujiaweizi Fault Depression,NE China

CAI Quansheng1,2, HU Mingyi2,3, CHEN Xiaohong1, HU Zhonggui3   

  1. 1. Wuhan Center of China Geological Survey, Wuhan 430205, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Exploration Technologies for Oil and Gas Resources, Yangtze University, Ministry of Education, Yangtze University, Wuhan 430100, China;
    3. School of Geosciences, Yangtze University, Wuhan 430100, China
  • Received:2017-08-10 Revised:2017-11-13 Online:2018-01-21 Published:2018-01-21

PDF (PC)

449

摘要： 为了深化小型断陷湖盆扇三角洲沉积地质认识，促进该类盆地油气勘探开发，以松辽盆地徐家围子北部沙河子组为研究对象，综合运用岩心、录井、测井以及地震资料对小型断陷湖盆扇三角洲沉积特征与发育模式进行了深入分析。结果表明：徐家围子北部沙河子组扇三角洲沉积发育，岩性以低成熟度的褐色、灰色砂砾岩和褐色、黑色泥岩为主，局部可见碳化泥岩；砂砾岩在测井曲线上多呈中幅齿状或齿化箱状，成像测井上常为暗色背景下大小不一的亮斑响应；在地震剖面上，扇三角洲沉积多表现为中低频楔状前积反射、丘状或楔状杂乱反射特征。平面分布特征显示，扇三角洲的发育与盆地范围以及构造特征均密切相关：沙河子组沉积初期，由于盆地范围小、沉积物供给充足且搬运距离短，扇三角洲沉积不仅发育于西部陡坡带，东部相对缓坡区同样发育；随着控盆断裂持续活动和盆地范围的扩大，东部缓坡带扇三角洲沉积逐渐向辫状河三角洲沉积转变，不同构造带上的沉积相开始出现分异，据此建立了强烈断陷期小型断陷湖盆扇三角洲的发育模式，可为类似小型断陷湖盆扇三角洲的油气勘探提供地质依据。

关键词: 天然气成因, 成藏期次, 成藏过程, 须家河组, 川南地区

Abstract: The geological knowledge of fan delta in small-scale faulted basins will be of important significance for oil & gas exploration. Taking Shahezi Formation in the northern Xujiaweizi Fault Depression as an example, the data of core,logging and seismic were used to study the sedimentary characteristics and development model of fan delta in a small faulted basin formed during the intensive rifting stage. The results show that fan delta develops in Shahezi Formation within the study area,and the sediments of fan delta are mainly composed of brown to grey sandy conglomerate with low maturity,brown and black mudstone,and locally distributed carbonized mudstone. On the logging curves,the sandy conglomerate appears as zigzag shape with medium amplitude and zigzag box;on the imaging logging profiles,the conglomerates with high content of argillaceous sediments appear as bright spots with different size on black background. Furthermore,according to well-seismic calibrating,the sediments of fan delta typically show sphenoid progradation reflections,moundy and sphenoid disorder reflections on seismic profiles. By the analysis of fan delta distribution in Shahezi Formation,it indicates that the development of fan delta is closely related to basin scope and tectonic features. During the early sedimentary stage of the Shahezi Formation,not only the west steep slope but also the east gentle slope was dominated by fan deltas due to the small scope of the basin and sufficient sediments with short transportation distance. However,with the continuous activity of basin-controlling fault and the extension of basin,the fan delta on east gentle slope was gradually replaced with braided delta,and the differentiation characteristics of sedimentary facies on different tectonic belts become obvious. According to these features above,the development model of fan delta in a small fault basin formed during the intensive rifting stage was proposed,which will be very important for the oil and gas exploration in similar basins.

Key words: natural gas genesis, accumulation stages, accumulation process, Xujiahe Formation, southern Sichuan Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE121.3
[1] 胡受权,颜其彬,张永贵.断陷湖盆陡坡带陆相层序体系域与油气藏成藏类型.石油勘探与开发,1999,26(1):13-17. HU S Q,YAN Q B,ZHANG Y G. Applying terrigenous sequence stratigraphy to prediction of hydrocarbon trap. Petroleum Exploration and Development,1999,26(1):13-17.
[2] 赵文智,方杰.不同类型断陷湖盆岩性-地层油气藏油气富集规律——以冀中坳陷和二连盆地岩性-地层油气藏对比为例. 石油勘探与开发,2007,34(2):129-134. ZHAO W Z,FANG J. Petroleum enrichment rules in lithologic and stratigraphic pools in different faulted basins:an example from the correlation of lithologic and stratigraphic pools in Jizhong Depression and in Erlian Basin. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2007,34(2):129-134.
[3] 曹刚,邹婧芸,曲全工,等.东营凹陷永1块沙四段砂砾岩体有效储层控制因素分析.岩性油气藏,2016,28(1):30-37. CAO G,ZOU J Y,QU Q G,et al. Controlling factors of effective reservoirs in glutenite body of the fourth member of Shahejie Formation in Yong 1 block,Dongying Sag. Lithologic Reservoirs,2016,28(1):30-37.
[4] 宋国奇,郝雪峰,刘克奇.箕状断陷盆地形成机制、沉积体系与成藏规律——以济阳坳陷为例.石油与天然气地质,2014, 35(3):303-310. SONG G Q,HAO X F,LIU K Q. Tectonic evolution,sedimentary system and petroleum distribution patterns in dustpanshaped rift basin:a case study from Jiyang Depression,Bohai Bay Basin. Oil & Gas Geology,2014,35(3):303-310.
[5] 闫建平,言语,李尊芝,等.砂砾岩储层物性演化及影响因素研究——以东营凹陷北部陡坡带为例.岩性油气藏,2016,28(2):1-6. YAN J P,YAN Y,LI Z Z,et al. Physical property evolution of glutenite reservoir and its influencing factors:a case study from northern steep slope zone in Dongying Sag. Lithologic Reservoirs,2016,28(2):1-6.
[6] 邹妞妞,张大权,钱海涛,等.准噶尔盆地玛北斜坡区扇三角洲砂砾岩储层主控因素.岩性油气藏,2016,28(4):24-33. ZOU N N,ZHANG D Q,QIAN H T,et al. Main controlling factors of glutenite reservoir of fan delta in Mabei slope,Junggar Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs,2016,28(4):24-33.
[7] 李占东,于鹏,邵碧莹,等.复杂断陷盆地沉积充填演化与构造活动的响应分析——以海拉尔-塔木察格盆地中部断陷带为例.中国矿业大学学报,2015,44(5):853-860. LI Z D,YU P,SHAO B Y,et al. Response analysis of sedimentary filling evolution and tectonic activity in complicated faulted basin:an example of middle rift belt in Hailar-Tamtsag Basin. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,2015,44(5):853-860.
[8] 吴冬,朱筱敏,李志,等. 苏丹Muglad盆地Fula凹陷白垩纪断陷期沉积模式.石油勘探与开发,2015,42(3):319-327. WU D,ZHU X M,LI Z,et al. Depositional models in Cretaceous rift stage of Fula Sag,Muglad Basin,Sudan. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2015,42(3):319-327.
[9] 于兴河,姜辉,李胜利,等.中国东部中、新生代陆相断陷盆地沉积充填模式及其控制因素——以济阳坳陷东营凹陷为例. 岩性油气藏,2007,19(1):39-45. YU X H,JIANG H,LI S L,et al. Depositional filling models and controlling factors on Mesozoic and Cenozoic fault basins of terrestrial facies in eastern China-a case study of Dongying Sag of Jiyang Depression. Lithologic Reservoirs,2007,19(1):39-45.
[10] 张有平,盛世锋,高祥录. 玛湖凹陷玛2井区下乌尔禾组扇三角洲沉积及有利储层分布. 岩性油气藏,2015,27(5):204-210. ZHANG Y P,SHENG S F,GAO X L. Fan delta sedimentation and favorable reservoir distribution of the lower Urho Formation in Ma 2 well block of Mahu Depression. Lithologic Reservoirs,2015,27(5):204-210.
[11] 赵泽辉,徐淑娟,姜晓华,等.松辽盆地深层地质结构及致密砂砾岩气勘探.石油勘探与开发,2016,43(1):12-23. ZHAO Z H,XU S J,JIANG X H,et al. Deep strata geologic structure and tight conglomerate gas exploration in Songliao Basin,east China. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2016, 43(1):13-23.
[12] 黄薇,杨步增,孙立东,等.松辽盆地北部深层断陷分布规律及勘探潜力.大庆石油地质与开发,2014,33(5):76-81. HUANG W,YANG B Z,SUN L D,et al. Distribution laws and exploratory potentials of the deep fault depressions in north Songliao Basin. Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing,2014,33(5):76-81.
[13] 王志宏,李建明,王延斌,等.徐家围子断陷沙河子组煤层发育特征及分布预测.中国煤炭地质,2015,27(1):13-17. WANG Z H,LI J M,WANG Y B,et al. Shahezi Formation coal seam development features and distribution prediction in Xujiaweizi Fault Depression. Coal Geology of China,2015,27(1):13-17.
[14] 吕鹏佶,柳成志,颜康,等.松辽盆地徐家围子断陷沙河子组地震相研究.地质与资源,2014,23(4):330-334. LYU P J,LIU C Z,YAN K,et al. Study on the seismic facies of the Shahezi Formation in Xujiaweizi Fault Depression in Songliao Basin. Geology and Resources,2014,23(4):330-334.
[15] 李娟,舒良树.松辽盆地中、新生代构造特征及其演化.南京大学学报(自然科学版),2002,38(4):525-531. LI J,SHU L S. Mesozoic-Cenozoic tectonic features and evolution of the Songliao Basin,NE China. Journal of Naijing University(Natural Sciences),2002,38(4):525-531.
[16] 王璞珺,赵然磊,蒙启安,等.白垩纪松辽盆地:从火山裂谷到陆内拗陷的动力学环境.地学前缘,2015,22(3):99-117. WANG P J,ZHAO R L,MENG Q A,et al. The Cretaceous Songliao Basin:Dynamic background from volcanic rift to interior sag basin. Earth Science Frontiers,2015,22(3):99-117.
[17] 张元高,陈树民,张尔华,等.徐家围子断陷构造地质特征研究新进展.岩石学报,2010,26(1):142-148. ZHANG Y G,CHEN S M,ZHANG E H,et al. The new progress of Xujiaweizi Fault Depression characteristics of structural geology research. Acta Petrologica Sinica,2010,26(1):42-148.
[18] 张尔华,姜传金,张元高,等.徐家围子断陷深层结构形成与演化的探讨.岩石学报,2010,26(1):149-157. ZHANG E H,JIANG C J,ZHANG Y G,et al. Study on the formation and evolution of deep structure of Xujiaweizi Fault Depression. Acta Petrologica Sinica,2010,26(1):149-157.
[19] 陈俊安,赵泽辉,江黎.松辽盆地徐家围子断陷沙河子组层序地层格架建立与模式研究.科学技术与工程,2014,14(10):183-190. CHEN J A,ZHAO Z H,JIANG L. The establishment of sequence stratigraphic framework and its models of the Shahezi Formation in Xujiaweizi Fault Depression,Songliao Basin. Science Technology and Engineering,2014,14(10):183-190.
[20] 范兴燕,张研,唐衔,等.断陷湖盆地震相模式研究要点——以Capella油田为例.石油地球物理勘探,2015,50(6):1196-1206. FAN X Y,ZHANG Y,TANG X,et al. Key research points on seismic facies models of faulted lake basin:a case study of Capella Oilfield. Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2015,50(6):1196-1206.
[21] 甘立琴,马世忠,赵辉.伊通盆地岔路河断陷奢岭组地震相研究.科学技术与工程,2013,13(2):428-433. GAN L Q,MA S Z,ZHAO H. Seismic facies of the Sheling Formation of the Chaluhe Depression in the Yitong Basin. Science Technology and Engineering,2013,13(2):428-433.
[22] 吕栋,戴胜群,李斐,等.断陷盆地前积地震相及其岩性地层油气藏发育规律——以彰武断陷九佛堂组为例. 断块油气田,2015,22(1):16-20. LYU D,DAI S Q,LI F,et al. Foreset facies and its development rule of litho-stratigraphic reservoirs in fault depression basin:taking Jiufotang Formation of Zhangwu Fault Depression Basin. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2015,22(1):16-20.
[23] 于兴河,瞿建华,谭程鹏,等.玛湖凹陷百口泉组扇三角洲砾岩岩相及成因模式.新疆石油地质,2014,35(6):619-627. YU X H,QU J H,TAN C P,et al. Conglomerate lithofacies and origin models of fan deltas of Baikouquan Formation in Mahu Sag,Junggar Basin. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2014,35(6):619-627.
[1] 丛平, 闫建平, 井翠, 张家浩, 唐洪明, 王军, 耿斌, 王敏, 晁静. 页岩气储层可压裂性级别测井评价及展布特征——以川南X地区五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 177-188.
[2] 田光荣, 王建功, 孙秀建, 李红哲, 杨魏, 白亚东, 裴明利, 周飞, 司丹. 柴达木盆地阿尔金山前带侏罗系含油气系统成藏差异性及其主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 131-144.
[3] 卢恩俊, 柳少波, 于志超, 鲁雪松, 成定树. 柴达木盆地英雄岭南带断裂活动特征及其控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 161-174.
[4] 姚军, 乐幸福, 陈娟, 苏旺, 张永峰. 基于拟三维多属性反演的优质烃源岩分布预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 248-257.
[5] 高乔, 王兴志, 朱逸青, 赵圣贤, 张芮, 肖哲宇. 川南地区龙马溪组元素地球化学特征及有机质富集主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(4): 72-84.
[6] 郑珊珊, 刘洛夫, 汪洋, 罗泽华, 王曦蒙, 盛悦, 许同, 王柏寒. 川南地区五峰组—龙马溪组页岩微观孔隙结构特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(3): 55-65.
[7] 叶博, 梁晓伟, 宋娟, 曹润荣, 毛振华, 郝炳英. 鄂尔多斯盆地演武地区侏罗系延安组油藏成藏特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(4): 65-73.
[8] 王威. 川东北地区须家河组天然气高效成藏模式探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(3): 27-34.
[9] 陈居凯, 朱炎铭, 崔兆帮, 张闯辉. 川南龙马溪组页岩孔隙结构综合表征及其分形特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(1): 55-62.
[10] 陈志强, 吴思源, 白蓉, 雷刚. 基于流动单元的致密砂岩气储层渗透率测井评价——以川中广安地区须家河组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(6): 76-83.
[11] 王鹏, 沈忠民, 何崇康, 陈刚, 潘树林, 王君泽. 川南地区须家河组天然气地球化学特征及成藏过程[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(5): 19-27.
[12] 周启伟，李 勇，汪正江，余 谦，王锦程，王伟明. 龙门山前陆盆地南段须家河组页岩有机地球化学特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(6): 45-51.
[13] 马庆佑, 田 鹏, 吕海涛, 沙旭光. 塔里木盆地 GL3 井鹰山组沥青的发现及地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(3): 82-86.
[14] 胡浩，路遥，唐群英，汪敏. 川东北地区须家河组储层成岩作用对孔隙演化影响的定量研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(4): 103-108.
[15] 王昌勇，周毅，李世林，李爽，王小娟，郑荣才. 四川盆地卧新双地区须家河组储层发育特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(2): 21-26.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 庞雄奇, 陈冬霞, 张　俊. 隐蔽油气藏的概念与分类及其在实际应用中需要注意的问题[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 1 -8 .
[2] 雷卞军，张吉，王彩丽，王晓蓉，李世临，刘斌. 高分辨率层序地层对微相和储层的控制作者用——以靖边气田统5井区马五段上部为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 1 -7 .
[3] 杨杰，卫平生，李相博. 石油地震地质学的基本概念、内容和研究方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 1 -6 .
[4] 王延奇，胡明毅，刘富艳，王辉，胡治华. 鄂西利川见天坝长兴组海绵礁岩石类型及礁体演化阶段[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(3): 44 -48 .
[5] 代黎明, 李建平, 周心怀, 崔忠国, 程建春. 渤海海域新近系浅水三角洲沉积体系分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 75 -81 .
[6] 段友祥, 曹婧, 孙歧峰. 自适应倾角导向技术在断层识别中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(4): 101 -107 .
[7] 黄龙，田景春，肖玲，王峰. 鄂尔多斯盆地富县地区长6砂岩储层特征及评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 83 -88 .
[8] 杨仕维，李建明. 震积岩特征综述及地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 89 -94 .
[9] 李传亮，涂兴万. 储层岩石的2种应力敏感机制——应力敏感有利于驱油[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 111 -113 .
[10] 李君, 黄志龙, 李佳, 柳波. 松辽盆地东南隆起区长期隆升背景下的油气成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 57 -61 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发