岩性油气藏 ›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (1): 97–111.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2018.01.010

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

南哈Marsel探区Asa区块下石炭统岩溶储层精细刻画及分布特征

赵搏志1, 林畅松1,2, 李浩2, 王媛1, 孙彦达3, 何海全3, 王清龙3   

  1. 1. 中国地质大学(北京)能源学院, 北京 100083;
    2. 中国地质大学(北京)海洋学院, 北京 100083;
    3. 洲际油气股份有限公司 勘探开发技术研究院, 北京 100016
  • 收稿日期:2017-08-19 修回日期:2017-10-29 出版日期:2018-01-21 发布日期:2018-01-21
  • 作者简介:赵搏志(1994-),男,中国地质大学(北京)在读硕士研究生,研究方向为碳酸盐岩沉积与储层。地址:(100083)北京市海淀区学院路29号中国地质大学(北京)。Email:zboz1994@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点基础研究发展(973计划)项目“中国典型叠合盆地深层有效碳酸盐岩储层的发育模式”(编号:2011CB201100-03)和中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目“塔里木盆地中上奥陶统海相碳酸盐岩台地沉积演化及储层分布特征和控制因素”(编号:2652015362)联合资助

Description and distribution characteristics of Lower Carboniferous karst reservoir of Asa block in Marsel area,southern Kazakhstan

ZHAO Bozhi1, LIN Changsong1,2, LI Hao2, WANG Yuan1, SUN Yanda3, HE Haiquan3, WANG Qinglong3   

  1. 1. School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China;
    2. School of Ocean Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China;
    3. Research Institute of Exploration and Development Technology, Geo-Jade Petroleum Corporation, Beijing 100016, China
  • Received:2017-08-19 Revised:2017-10-29 Online:2018-01-21 Published:2018-01-21

摘要: 位于哈萨克斯坦Marsel探区中北部的Asa区块具有良好的天然气成藏条件,特别是下石炭统碳酸盐岩具有丰富的气测显示,成为近期勘探阶段的一个新突破,有利储层发育与岩溶作用关系密切。以成像测井资料为主,结合常规测井曲线、岩心以及测井数据交会图,对研究区内的典型单井进行了岩溶结构单元的精细划分,发现Asa区块下石炭统除杜内阶外,其余各个层段均有岩溶发育,但以谢尔普霍夫阶和维宪阶三段岩溶较为发育。利用成像测井对重点岩溶段进行了精细刻画,结果表明谢尔普霍夫阶岩溶和维宪阶三段岩溶具有明显不同的发育特征。其中,谢尔普霍夫阶发育2套岩溶,且这2套岩溶均发育在指示干旱暴露环境的膏岩层下方;通过横向连井对比,发现维宪阶三段所发育的岩溶具有表生岩溶的特征,纵向分带性明显,自上而下依次可划分为风化壳古土壤层、垂向渗流岩溶带和水平潜流岩溶带。其中,垂向渗流岩溶带以高角度溶蚀扩大缝为主,水平潜流岩溶带主要发育低角度溶蚀扩大缝和未充填洞穴。该研究成果对碳酸盐岩岩溶储层精细刻画及寻找有利的碳酸盐岩岩溶储层均具有指导作用。

关键词: 结垢, 预测, 饱和指数法, 稳定指数法, 华北油田

Abstract: The Asa block located in Marsel exploration area at the north and middle of Kazakhstan has a good condition for natural gas deposits,and the Lower Carboniferous carbonate rocks have a rich gas display,which becomes a new breakthrough in recent exploration phase. As found in the related study,the favorable reservoir development is closely related with karstification. The imaging logging data,combined with cores,conventional logging curves and logging cross plots,were used to divide karst structural units for typical single wells in the study area. The results show that except Tournaisian(C1t),Karst developed in all the other layers of the Lower Carboniferous in Asa block,especially developed in Visean(C1v3)and Serpukhovian(C1sr). A fine description of the main karst section was conducted by using imaging logging and the result shows that karst in C1sr and in C1v3 has obvious different characteristics. Moreover,there are two sets of karsts developed in C1sr,and they are below the gypsum rocks which can indicate arid environment. Through horizontal well-tie section contrast,C1v3 has the features of epigenic karst and obvious vertical distribution and it can be divided into the weathering crust palaeosol,vertical vadose karst zone and horizontal underflow karst zone from the top to the bottom. The vertical vadose karst zone is dominated by high angle dissolved enlarged fractures,while horizontal underflow karst zone is dominated by low angle dissolved enlarged fractures and unfilled caverns. This study result is helpful for guiding fine description of carbonate karst reservoirs and searching for favorable carbonate karst reservoirs.

Key words: scale formation, prediction, saturation index method, stability index method, Huabei Oilfield

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2
[1] 白国平. 世界碳酸盐岩大油气田分布特征. 古地理学报, 2006,8(2):243. BAI G P. Distribution patterns of giant carbonate fields in the world. Journal of Palaeogeography,2006,8(2):243.
[2] 江怀友,宋新民,王元基,等.世界海相碳酸盐岩油气勘探开发现状与展望.海洋石油,2008,28(4):7. JIANG H Y,SONG X M,WANG Y J,et al. Current situation and forecast of the world's carbonate oil and gas exploration and development. Offshore Oil,2008,28(4):7.
[3] 张宝民,刘静江.中国岩溶储集层分类与特征及相关的理论问题.石油勘探与开发,2009,36(1):12-29. ZHANG B M,LIU J J. Classification and characteristics of karst reservoirs in China and related theories. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2009,36(1):12-29.
[4] 金强,程付启,田飞.岩溶型碳酸盐岩储层中缝洞复合体及其油气地质意义. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2017,41(3):50. JIN Q,CHENG F Q,TIAN F. Identification of fracture-vug complex from karsted carbonates and its significance in petroleum geology. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science),2017,41(3):50.
[5] 赵文智,沈安江,潘文庆,等.碳酸盐岩岩溶储层类型研究及对勘探的指导意义——以塔里木盆地岩溶储层为例. 岩石学报,2013,29(9):3214. ZHAO W Z,SHEN A J,PAN W Q,et al. A research on carbonate karst reservoirsclassification and its implication on hydrocarbon exploration:cases studies from Tarim Basin. Acta Petrologica Sinica,2013,29(9):3214.
[6] 陈学时,易万霞,卢文忠.中国油气田古岩溶与油气储层.海相油气地质,2002,7(4):13-25. CHEN X S,YI W X,LU W Z. The paleokarst reservoirs in the oil and gas fields in China. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2002,7(4):13-25.
[7] 代冬冬,房启飞,万效国,等.哈拉哈塘地区奥陶系岩溶古河道识别及其成藏意义.岩性油气藏,2017,29(5):89-96. DAI D D,FANG Q F,WAN X G,et al. Identification of Ordovician karstic paleochannels and its accumulation significance in Halahatang area. Lithologic Reservoirs,2017,29(5):89-96.
[8] 汪洋,李树同,牟炜卫,等. 乌审旗-志丹地区奥陶系岩溶古地貌与马五41气水分布关系. 岩性油气藏,2016,28(2):64-71. WANG Y,LI S T,MOU W W,et al. Effect ofkarst paleogeomorphology of Ordovician on gas-water distributionof Ma 541 in Wushenqi-Zhidan area. Lithologic Reservoirs,2016,28(2):64-71.
[9] 倪超,杨家静,陈薇,等. 致密灰岩储层特征及发育模式——以四川盆地川中地区大安寨段为例. 岩性油气藏,2015,27(6):38-47. NI C,YANG J J,CHEN W,et al. Reservoir characteristics and development model of dense limestone:a case study from Da'anzhai member in central Sichuan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2015,27(6):38-47.
[10] 王珺,杨长春,许大华,等.微电阻率扫描成像测井方法应用及发展前景.地球物理学进展,2005,20(2):358. WANG J,YANG C C,XU D H,et al. Application and prospect of the formation microresistivity image well logging. Progress in Geophysics,2005,20(2):358.
[11] 吴文圣,陈钢花,王中文,等.用地层微电阻率扫描成像测井识别沉积构造特征.测井技术,2000,24(1):60. WU W S,CHEN G H,WANG Z W,et al. Features recognition of sedimentary structure on formation microscanner log. Well Logging Technology,2000,24(1):60.
[12] 陈钢花,吴文圣,王中文,等. 利用地层微电阻率成像测井识别裂缝.测井技术,1999,23(4):279. CHEN G H,WU W S,WANG Z W,et al. Fracture identification by microresistivity scanner log. Well Logging Technology, 1999,23(4):279.
[13] 肖立志,张元中,吴文圣,等. 成像测井学基础.北京:石油工业出版社,2010:6. XIAO L Z,ZHANG Y Z,WU W S,et al. The imaging logging study basis. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2010:6.
[14] 耿晓洁,林畅松,韩剑发,等.塔中北斜坡中下奥陶统鹰山组岩溶储层成像测井相精细研究. 天然气地球科学,2015,26(2):229-240.GENG X J,LIN C S,HAN J F,et al. FMI facies research in the karst reservoir of the middle-lower Ordovician Yingshan Formation in the northern slope of Tazhong area. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015,26(2):229-240.
[15] 王晔磊,邱隆伟,师政,等. 基于FM I测井相的岩溶发育模式——以渤海湾盆地黄骅坳陷南堡凹陷古生界为例.新疆石油地质,2016,37(3):301-306. WANG Y L,QIU L W,SHI Z,et al. Study on karst development pattern based on FMI logging facies:a case study of Paleozoic strata in Nanpu Sag of Huanghua Depression,Bohai Bay Basin. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2016,37(3):301-306.
[16] 于靖波,李忠,杨柳,等.塔中北斜坡鹰山组深埋岩溶型储层刻画及分布规律.石油学报,2016,37(3):299-310. YU J B,LI Z,YANG L,et al. Characterization and distribution of deeply-buried paleokarst carbonate reservoirs of Ordovician Yingshan Formation in northern slope of central Tarim Basin. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(3):299-310.
[17] 杨柳,李忠,吕修祥,等. 塔中地区鹰山组岩溶储层表征与古地貌识别——基于电成像测井的解析. 石油学报,2014,35(2):265-275. YANG L,LI Z,LYU X X,et al. Paleotopographic characterization and reconstruction of karst reservoirs in Yingshan Formation,Tazhong area,Tarim Basin:a research based on borehole imageloginterpretation.ActaPetroleiSinica,2014,35(2):265-275.
[18] 庞雄奇,黄捍东,林畅松,等.哈萨克斯坦Marsel探区叠复连续气田形成、分布与探测及资源储量评价.石油学报,2014, 35(6):1013. PANG X Q,HUANG H D,LIN C S,et al. Formation,distribution,exploration,and resource/reserve assessment of superimposed continuous gas field in Marsel exploration area,Kazakhstan. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2014,35(6):1013.
[19] 谢方克,殷进垠. 哈萨克斯坦共和国油气地质资源分析.地质与资源,2004,13(1):63. XIE F K,YIN J Y. The study of hydrocarbon resources in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Geology and Resources,2004,13(1):63.
[20] 万维,傅恒,黄海平,等.哈萨克斯坦楚-萨雷苏盆地热兹卡兹甘地区构造运动与沉积演化. 沉积与特提斯地质,2007,27(4):60. WAN W,FU H,HUANG H P,et al. Tectonic movement and sedimentary evolution in the Zhezkazgan region,Chu-Saleisu Basin,Kazakstan. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 2007,27(4):60.
[21] 郑俊章,周海燕,黄先雄.哈萨克斯坦地区石油地质基本特征及勘探潜力分析.中国石油勘探,2009,14(2):84. ZHENG J Z,ZHOU H Y,HUANG X X. Basic characteristics of petroleum geology and exploration potential analysis in Kazakhstan. China Petroleum Exploration,2009,14(2):84.
[22] 李虹.楚-萨雷苏盆地南哈区块早石炭世沉积层序、沉积演化及有利储集相带分布预测分析.北京:中国地质大学(北京), 2014:24,58. LI H. Sequence,sedimentary evolution and favorable reservoir prediction of the early carboniferous in Chu-Sarysu Basin,Southern Kazakhstan. Beijing:China University of Geosciences (Beijing),2014:24,58.
[23] 马晖. 利用测井方法识别和评价塔河油田岩溶溶洞.断块油气田,2012,19(2):266-269. MA H. Identification and evaluation of karst caves with well logging method in Tahe Oilfield. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2012,19(2):266-269.
[24] 赵军,肖承文,虞兵,等.轮古地区碳酸盐岩洞穴型储层充填程度的测井评价.石油学报,2011,32(4):605-610. ZHAO J,XIAO C W,YU B,et al. Logging evaluation on filling degree of cavernous carbonate reservoirs in the Lunge region. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2011,32(4):605-610.
[25] 赵军,李宗杰,虞兵,等.碳酸盐岩洞穴充填物及其充填程度的测井判别方法.中国岩溶,2013,32(2):225-230. ZHAO J,LI Z J,YU B,et al. The logging recognition for the infill and the filling degree in karst cave. Carsologica Sinica, 2013,32(2):225-230.
[26] 肖玉茹,何峰煜,孙义梅.古洞穴型碳酸盐岩储层特征研究——以塔河油田奥陶系古洞穴为例. 石油与天然气地质,2003,24(1):75. XIAO Y R,HE F Y,SUN Y M. Reservoir characteristics of paleocave carbonates-a case study of Ordovician paleocave in Tahe oilfield,Tarim Basin. Oil & Gas Geology,2003,24(1):75.
[27] 徐微,贾振远,蔡忠贤. 碳酸盐岩古风化壳储层溶洞特征研究——以塔河油田奥陶系油藏为例. 石油天然气学报,2005, 27(1):156. XU W,JIA Z Y,CAI Z X. The study on the characteristic of vug reservoir in carbonate. Journal of Oil and Gas Technalogy, 2005,27(1):156.
[28] 程飞. 缝洞型碳酸盐岩油藏储层类型动静态识别方法——以塔里木盆地奥陶系为例. 岩性油气藏,2017,29(3):80. CHENG F. Integrated dynamic and static identification method of fracturedvuggy carbonatereservoirs:a case from the Ordovician in Tarim Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs,2017,29(3):80.
[29] 黄华. FMI成像测井技术在塔中碳酸盐岩中的应用.资源环境与工程,2008,22(1):92-95. HUANG H. Application of FMI well logging technology in carbonate reservoir of Tazhong oilfield. Resources Environment & Engineering,2008,22(1):92-95.
[1] 张闻亭, 龙礼文, 肖文华, 魏浩元, 李铁锋, 董震宇. 酒泉盆地青西凹陷窟窿山构造带下沟组沉积特征及储层预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 186-197.
[2] 孙夕平, 张昕, 李璇, 韩永科, 王春明, 魏军, 胡英, 徐光成, 张明, 戴晓峰. 基于叠前深度偏移的基岩潜山风化淋滤带储层预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 220-228.
[3] 曹思佳, 孙增玖, 党虎强, 曹帅, 刘冬民, 胡少华. 致密油薄砂体储层预测技术及应用实效——以松辽盆地敖南区块下白垩统泉头组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 239-247.
[4] 吴青鹏, 吕锡敏, 陈娟, 周在华, 袁成. 酒泉盆地营尔凹陷下白垩统下沟组沉积特征及勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5): 54-62.
[5] 宋宣毅, 刘月田, 马晶, 王俊强, 孔祥明, 任兴南. 基于灰狼算法优化的支持向量机产能预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 134-140.
[6] 李新豫, 张静, 包世海, 张连群, 朱其亮, 闫海军, 陈胜. 川中地区须二段气藏地震预测陷阱分析及对策——以龙女寺区块为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(1): 120-127.
[7] 张意超, 陈民锋, 屈丹, 毛梅芬, 杨子由. X油田特低渗透油藏井网加密效果预测方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(1): 144-151.
[8] 罗泽, 谢明英, 涂志勇, 卫喜辉, 陈一鸣. 一套针对高泥质疏松砂岩薄储层的识别技术——以珠江口盆地X油田为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(6): 95-101.
[9] 周华建. 基于叠前OVT域偏移的河道砂体预测方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(4): 112-120.
[10] 杜斌山, 雍学善, 王建功, 倪祥龙, 秦涛, 柴小颖. 测井约束下高精度叠前地震速度预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(4): 92-100.
[11] 刘恭利, 韩自军, 段新意, 甄宗玉. 薄互层火成岩地震响应特征及厚度预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(3): 105-112.
[12] 李小燕, 乔华伟, 张建魁, 马俊杰, 闫江涛, 李树同. 鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区长6储层矿物含量与孔隙度的线性关系[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(2): 66-74.
[13] 蔡志东, 李青, 王冲, 王勇, 范桦. 利用VSP多波资料预测地层深度及油气属性[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(1): 106-112.
[14] 李玉凤, 孙炜, 何巍巍, 杨云飞, 章新文, 严移胜. 基于叠前反演的泥页岩地层压力预测方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(1): 113-121.
[15] 孙文举, 王应斌, 徐文军. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘雷家碛地区盒8段致密储层“甜点”预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(1): 69-77.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 魏钦廉, 郑荣才, 肖玲, 王成玉, 牛小兵. 鄂尔多斯盆地吴旗地区长6 储层特征及影响因素分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 45 -50 .
[2] 王东琪, 殷代印. 水驱油藏相对渗透率曲线经验公式研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(3): 159 -164 .
[3] 李云,时志强. 四川盆地中部须家河组致密砂岩储层流体包裹体研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 27 -32 .
[4] 蒋韧,樊太亮,徐守礼. 地震地貌学概念与分析技术[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 33 -38 .
[5] 邹明亮,黄思静,胡作维,冯文立,刘昊年. 西湖凹陷平湖组砂岩中碳酸盐胶结物形成机制及其对储层质量的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 47 -52 .
[6] 王冰洁,何生,倪军娥,方度. 板桥凹陷钱圈地区主干断裂活动性分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 75 -82 .
[7] 陈振标,张超谟,张占松,令狐松,孙宝佃. 利用NMRT2谱分布研究储层岩石孔隙分形结构[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 105 -110 .
[8] 张厚福,徐兆辉. 从油气藏研究的历史论地层-岩性油气藏勘探[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 114 -123 .
[9] 张 霞. 勘探创造力的培养[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 16 -20 .
[10] 杨午阳, 杨文采, 刘全新, 王西文. 三维F-X域粘弹性波动方程保幅偏移方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 86 -91 .