岩性油气藏 ›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (1): 97–111.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2018.01.010

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

南哈Marsel探区Asa区块下石炭统岩溶储层精细刻画及分布特征

赵搏志1, 林畅松1,2, 李浩2, 王媛1, 孙彦达3, 何海全3, 王清龙3   

  1. 1. 中国地质大学(北京)能源学院, 北京 100083;
    2. 中国地质大学(北京)海洋学院, 北京 100083;
    3. 洲际油气股份有限公司 勘探开发技术研究院, 北京 100016
  • 收稿日期:2017-08-19 修回日期:2017-10-29 出版日期:2018-01-21 发布日期:2018-01-21
  • 第一作者:赵搏志(1994-),男,中国地质大学(北京)在读硕士研究生,研究方向为碳酸盐岩沉积与储层。地址:(100083)北京市海淀区学院路29号中国地质大学(北京)。Email:zboz1994@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点基础研究发展(973计划)项目“中国典型叠合盆地深层有效碳酸盐岩储层的发育模式”(编号:2011CB201100-03)和中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目“塔里木盆地中上奥陶统海相碳酸盐岩台地沉积演化及储层分布特征和控制因素”(编号:2652015362)联合资助

Description and distribution characteristics of Lower Carboniferous karst reservoir of Asa block in Marsel area,southern Kazakhstan

ZHAO Bozhi1, LIN Changsong1,2, LI Hao2, WANG Yuan1, SUN Yanda3, HE Haiquan3, WANG Qinglong3   

  1. 1. School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China;
    2. School of Ocean Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China;
    3. Research Institute of Exploration and Development Technology, Geo-Jade Petroleum Corporation, Beijing 100016, China
  • Received:2017-08-19 Revised:2017-10-29 Online:2018-01-21 Published:2018-01-21

摘要: 位于哈萨克斯坦Marsel探区中北部的Asa区块具有良好的天然气成藏条件,特别是下石炭统碳酸盐岩具有丰富的气测显示,成为近期勘探阶段的一个新突破,有利储层发育与岩溶作用关系密切。以成像测井资料为主,结合常规测井曲线、岩心以及测井数据交会图,对研究区内的典型单井进行了岩溶结构单元的精细划分,发现Asa区块下石炭统除杜内阶外,其余各个层段均有岩溶发育,但以谢尔普霍夫阶和维宪阶三段岩溶较为发育。利用成像测井对重点岩溶段进行了精细刻画,结果表明谢尔普霍夫阶岩溶和维宪阶三段岩溶具有明显不同的发育特征。其中,谢尔普霍夫阶发育2套岩溶,且这2套岩溶均发育在指示干旱暴露环境的膏岩层下方;通过横向连井对比,发现维宪阶三段所发育的岩溶具有表生岩溶的特征,纵向分带性明显,自上而下依次可划分为风化壳古土壤层、垂向渗流岩溶带和水平潜流岩溶带。其中,垂向渗流岩溶带以高角度溶蚀扩大缝为主,水平潜流岩溶带主要发育低角度溶蚀扩大缝和未充填洞穴。该研究成果对碳酸盐岩岩溶储层精细刻画及寻找有利的碳酸盐岩岩溶储层均具有指导作用。

关键词: 结垢, 预测, 饱和指数法, 稳定指数法, 华北油田

Abstract: The Asa block located in Marsel exploration area at the north and middle of Kazakhstan has a good condition for natural gas deposits,and the Lower Carboniferous carbonate rocks have a rich gas display,which becomes a new breakthrough in recent exploration phase. As found in the related study,the favorable reservoir development is closely related with karstification. The imaging logging data,combined with cores,conventional logging curves and logging cross plots,were used to divide karst structural units for typical single wells in the study area. The results show that except Tournaisian(C1t),Karst developed in all the other layers of the Lower Carboniferous in Asa block,especially developed in Visean(C1v3)and Serpukhovian(C1sr). A fine description of the main karst section was conducted by using imaging logging and the result shows that karst in C1sr and in C1v3 has obvious different characteristics. Moreover,there are two sets of karsts developed in C1sr,and they are below the gypsum rocks which can indicate arid environment. Through horizontal well-tie section contrast,C1v3 has the features of epigenic karst and obvious vertical distribution and it can be divided into the weathering crust palaeosol,vertical vadose karst zone and horizontal underflow karst zone from the top to the bottom. The vertical vadose karst zone is dominated by high angle dissolved enlarged fractures,while horizontal underflow karst zone is dominated by low angle dissolved enlarged fractures and unfilled caverns. This study result is helpful for guiding fine description of carbonate karst reservoirs and searching for favorable carbonate karst reservoirs.

Key words: scale formation, prediction, saturation index method, stability index method, Huabei Oilfield

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2
[1] 白国平. 世界碳酸盐岩大油气田分布特征. 古地理学报, 2006,8(2):243. BAI G P. Distribution patterns of giant carbonate fields in the world. Journal of Palaeogeography,2006,8(2):243.
[2] 江怀友,宋新民,王元基,等.世界海相碳酸盐岩油气勘探开发现状与展望.海洋石油,2008,28(4):7. JIANG H Y,SONG X M,WANG Y J,et al. Current situation and forecast of the world's carbonate oil and gas exploration and development. Offshore Oil,2008,28(4):7.
[3] 张宝民,刘静江.中国岩溶储集层分类与特征及相关的理论问题.石油勘探与开发,2009,36(1):12-29. ZHANG B M,LIU J J. Classification and characteristics of karst reservoirs in China and related theories. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2009,36(1):12-29.
[4] 金强,程付启,田飞.岩溶型碳酸盐岩储层中缝洞复合体及其油气地质意义. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2017,41(3):50. JIN Q,CHENG F Q,TIAN F. Identification of fracture-vug complex from karsted carbonates and its significance in petroleum geology. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science),2017,41(3):50.
[5] 赵文智,沈安江,潘文庆,等.碳酸盐岩岩溶储层类型研究及对勘探的指导意义——以塔里木盆地岩溶储层为例. 岩石学报,2013,29(9):3214. ZHAO W Z,SHEN A J,PAN W Q,et al. A research on carbonate karst reservoirsclassification and its implication on hydrocarbon exploration:cases studies from Tarim Basin. Acta Petrologica Sinica,2013,29(9):3214.
[6] 陈学时,易万霞,卢文忠.中国油气田古岩溶与油气储层.海相油气地质,2002,7(4):13-25. CHEN X S,YI W X,LU W Z. The paleokarst reservoirs in the oil and gas fields in China. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2002,7(4):13-25.
[7] 代冬冬,房启飞,万效国,等.哈拉哈塘地区奥陶系岩溶古河道识别及其成藏意义.岩性油气藏,2017,29(5):89-96. DAI D D,FANG Q F,WAN X G,et al. Identification of Ordovician karstic paleochannels and its accumulation significance in Halahatang area. Lithologic Reservoirs,2017,29(5):89-96.
[8] 汪洋,李树同,牟炜卫,等. 乌审旗-志丹地区奥陶系岩溶古地貌与马五41气水分布关系. 岩性油气藏,2016,28(2):64-71. WANG Y,LI S T,MOU W W,et al. Effect ofkarst paleogeomorphology of Ordovician on gas-water distributionof Ma 541 in Wushenqi-Zhidan area. Lithologic Reservoirs,2016,28(2):64-71.
[9] 倪超,杨家静,陈薇,等. 致密灰岩储层特征及发育模式——以四川盆地川中地区大安寨段为例. 岩性油气藏,2015,27(6):38-47. NI C,YANG J J,CHEN W,et al. Reservoir characteristics and development model of dense limestone:a case study from Da'anzhai member in central Sichuan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2015,27(6):38-47.
[10] 王珺,杨长春,许大华,等.微电阻率扫描成像测井方法应用及发展前景.地球物理学进展,2005,20(2):358. WANG J,YANG C C,XU D H,et al. Application and prospect of the formation microresistivity image well logging. Progress in Geophysics,2005,20(2):358.
[11] 吴文圣,陈钢花,王中文,等.用地层微电阻率扫描成像测井识别沉积构造特征.测井技术,2000,24(1):60. WU W S,CHEN G H,WANG Z W,et al. Features recognition of sedimentary structure on formation microscanner log. Well Logging Technology,2000,24(1):60.
[12] 陈钢花,吴文圣,王中文,等. 利用地层微电阻率成像测井识别裂缝.测井技术,1999,23(4):279. CHEN G H,WU W S,WANG Z W,et al. Fracture identification by microresistivity scanner log. Well Logging Technology, 1999,23(4):279.
[13] 肖立志,张元中,吴文圣,等. 成像测井学基础.北京:石油工业出版社,2010:6. XIAO L Z,ZHANG Y Z,WU W S,et al. The imaging logging study basis. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2010:6.
[14] 耿晓洁,林畅松,韩剑发,等.塔中北斜坡中下奥陶统鹰山组岩溶储层成像测井相精细研究. 天然气地球科学,2015,26(2):229-240.GENG X J,LIN C S,HAN J F,et al. FMI facies research in the karst reservoir of the middle-lower Ordovician Yingshan Formation in the northern slope of Tazhong area. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015,26(2):229-240.
[15] 王晔磊,邱隆伟,师政,等. 基于FM I测井相的岩溶发育模式——以渤海湾盆地黄骅坳陷南堡凹陷古生界为例.新疆石油地质,2016,37(3):301-306. WANG Y L,QIU L W,SHI Z,et al. Study on karst development pattern based on FMI logging facies:a case study of Paleozoic strata in Nanpu Sag of Huanghua Depression,Bohai Bay Basin. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2016,37(3):301-306.
[16] 于靖波,李忠,杨柳,等.塔中北斜坡鹰山组深埋岩溶型储层刻画及分布规律.石油学报,2016,37(3):299-310. YU J B,LI Z,YANG L,et al. Characterization and distribution of deeply-buried paleokarst carbonate reservoirs of Ordovician Yingshan Formation in northern slope of central Tarim Basin. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(3):299-310.
[17] 杨柳,李忠,吕修祥,等. 塔中地区鹰山组岩溶储层表征与古地貌识别——基于电成像测井的解析. 石油学报,2014,35(2):265-275. YANG L,LI Z,LYU X X,et al. Paleotopographic characterization and reconstruction of karst reservoirs in Yingshan Formation,Tazhong area,Tarim Basin:a research based on borehole imageloginterpretation.ActaPetroleiSinica,2014,35(2):265-275.
[18] 庞雄奇,黄捍东,林畅松,等.哈萨克斯坦Marsel探区叠复连续气田形成、分布与探测及资源储量评价.石油学报,2014, 35(6):1013. PANG X Q,HUANG H D,LIN C S,et al. Formation,distribution,exploration,and resource/reserve assessment of superimposed continuous gas field in Marsel exploration area,Kazakhstan. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2014,35(6):1013.
[19] 谢方克,殷进垠. 哈萨克斯坦共和国油气地质资源分析.地质与资源,2004,13(1):63. XIE F K,YIN J Y. The study of hydrocarbon resources in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Geology and Resources,2004,13(1):63.
[20] 万维,傅恒,黄海平,等.哈萨克斯坦楚-萨雷苏盆地热兹卡兹甘地区构造运动与沉积演化. 沉积与特提斯地质,2007,27(4):60. WAN W,FU H,HUANG H P,et al. Tectonic movement and sedimentary evolution in the Zhezkazgan region,Chu-Saleisu Basin,Kazakstan. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 2007,27(4):60.
[21] 郑俊章,周海燕,黄先雄.哈萨克斯坦地区石油地质基本特征及勘探潜力分析.中国石油勘探,2009,14(2):84. ZHENG J Z,ZHOU H Y,HUANG X X. Basic characteristics of petroleum geology and exploration potential analysis in Kazakhstan. China Petroleum Exploration,2009,14(2):84.
[22] 李虹.楚-萨雷苏盆地南哈区块早石炭世沉积层序、沉积演化及有利储集相带分布预测分析.北京:中国地质大学(北京), 2014:24,58. LI H. Sequence,sedimentary evolution and favorable reservoir prediction of the early carboniferous in Chu-Sarysu Basin,Southern Kazakhstan. Beijing:China University of Geosciences (Beijing),2014:24,58.
[23] 马晖. 利用测井方法识别和评价塔河油田岩溶溶洞.断块油气田,2012,19(2):266-269. MA H. Identification and evaluation of karst caves with well logging method in Tahe Oilfield. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2012,19(2):266-269.
[24] 赵军,肖承文,虞兵,等.轮古地区碳酸盐岩洞穴型储层充填程度的测井评价.石油学报,2011,32(4):605-610. ZHAO J,XIAO C W,YU B,et al. Logging evaluation on filling degree of cavernous carbonate reservoirs in the Lunge region. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2011,32(4):605-610.
[25] 赵军,李宗杰,虞兵,等.碳酸盐岩洞穴充填物及其充填程度的测井判别方法.中国岩溶,2013,32(2):225-230. ZHAO J,LI Z J,YU B,et al. The logging recognition for the infill and the filling degree in karst cave. Carsologica Sinica, 2013,32(2):225-230.
[26] 肖玉茹,何峰煜,孙义梅.古洞穴型碳酸盐岩储层特征研究——以塔河油田奥陶系古洞穴为例. 石油与天然气地质,2003,24(1):75. XIAO Y R,HE F Y,SUN Y M. Reservoir characteristics of paleocave carbonates-a case study of Ordovician paleocave in Tahe oilfield,Tarim Basin. Oil & Gas Geology,2003,24(1):75.
[27] 徐微,贾振远,蔡忠贤. 碳酸盐岩古风化壳储层溶洞特征研究——以塔河油田奥陶系油藏为例. 石油天然气学报,2005, 27(1):156. XU W,JIA Z Y,CAI Z X. The study on the characteristic of vug reservoir in carbonate. Journal of Oil and Gas Technalogy, 2005,27(1):156.
[28] 程飞. 缝洞型碳酸盐岩油藏储层类型动静态识别方法——以塔里木盆地奥陶系为例. 岩性油气藏,2017,29(3):80. CHENG F. Integrated dynamic and static identification method of fracturedvuggy carbonatereservoirs:a case from the Ordovician in Tarim Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs,2017,29(3):80.
[29] 黄华. FMI成像测井技术在塔中碳酸盐岩中的应用.资源环境与工程,2008,22(1):92-95. HUANG H. Application of FMI well logging technology in carbonate reservoir of Tazhong oilfield. Resources Environment & Engineering,2008,22(1):92-95.
[1] 李道清, 陈永波, 杨东, 李啸, 苏航, 周俊峰, 仇庭聪, 石小茜. 准噶尔盆地白家海凸起侏罗系西山窑组煤岩气“甜点”储层智能综合预测技术[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 23-35.
[2] 周自强, 朱正平, 潘仁芳, 董於, 金吉能. 基于波形相控反演的致密砂岩储层模拟预测方法——以黄骅坳陷沧东凹陷南部古近系孔二段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 77-86.
[3] 陈康, 戴隽成, 魏玮, 刘伟方, 闫媛媛, 郗诚, 吕龑, 杨广广. 致密砂岩AVO属性的贝叶斯岩相划分方法——以川中地区侏罗系沙溪庙组沙一段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 111-121.
[4] 王子昕, 柳广弟, 袁光杰, 杨恒林, 付利, 王元, 陈刚, 张恒. 鄂尔多斯盆地庆城地区三叠系长7段烃源岩特征及控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 133-144.
[5] 何文渊, 陈可洋. 哈萨克斯坦南图尔盖盆地Doshan斜坡带岩性油气藏储层预测方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 1-11.
[6] 申有义, 王凯峰, 唐书恒, 张松航, 郗兆栋, 杨晓东. 沁水盆地榆社—武乡区块二叠系煤系页岩储层地质建模及“甜点”预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 98-108.
[7] 桂金咏, 李胜军, 高建虎, 刘炳杨, 郭欣. 基于特征变量扩展的含气饱和度随机森林预测方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 65-75.
[8] 熊波, 朱冬雪, 方朝合, 王社教, 杜广林, 薛亚斐, 莫邵元, 辛福东. 基于BP算法的中深层同轴套管换热量预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 15-22.
[9] 李毕松, 苏建龙, 蒲勇, 缪志伟, 张文军, 肖伟, 张雷, 江馀. 四川盆地元坝地区二叠系茅口组相控岩溶刻画及预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 69-77.
[10] 刘亚明, 王丹丹, 田作基, 张志伟, 王童奎, 王朝锋, 阳孝法, 周玉冰. 巴西桑托斯盆地复杂碳酸盐岩油田火成岩发育特征及预测方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 127-137.
[11] 张昌民, 张祥辉, 朱锐, 冯文杰, 尹太举, 尹艳树, Adrian J. HARTLEY. 分支河流体系研究进展及应用前景展望[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 11-25.
[12] 李胜军, 高建虎, 张繁昌, 贺东阳, 桂金咏. 一种基于压缩感知理论的强反射地震信号消减方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(4): 70-78.
[13] 张卫卫, 刘军, 刘力辉, 张晓钊, 白海军, 杨登锋. 珠江口盆地番禺4洼古近系文昌组岩性预测技术及应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 118-125.
[14] 孟智强, 葛丽珍, 祝晓林, 王永平, 朱志强. 气顶边水油藏气/水驱产油量贡献评价方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(5): 162-170.
[15] 邱晨, 闫建平, 钟光海, 李志鹏, 范存辉, 张悦, 胡钦红, 黄毅. 四川盆地泸州地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩沉积微相划分及测井识别[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(3): 117-130.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 段天向, 刘晓梅, 张亚军, 肖述琴. Petrel 建模中的几点认识[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 102 -107 .
[2] 张立秋. 南二区东部二类油层上返层系组合优化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 116 -120 .
[3] 张娣,侯中健,王亚辉,王莹,王春联. 板桥—北大港地区沙河街组沙一段湖相碳酸盐岩沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(4): 92 -97 .
[4] 樊怀才,李晓平,窦天财,吴欣袁. 应力敏感效应的气井流量动态特征研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(4): 130 -134 .
[5] 田淑芳,张鸿文. 应用生命周期旋回理论预测辽河油田石油探明储量增长趋势[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 98 -100 .
[6] 杨凯,郭肖. 裂缝性低渗透油藏三维两相黑油数值模拟研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(3): 118 -121 .
[7] 翟中喜,秦伟军,郭金瑞. 油气充满度与储层通道渗流能力的定量关系———以泌阳凹陷双河油田岩性油藏为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(4): 92 -95 .
[8] 戚明辉,陆正元,袁帅,李新华. 塔河油田12 区块油藏水体来源及出水特征分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(4): 115 -119 .
[9] 李相博,陈启林,刘化清,完颜容,慕敬魁,廖建波,魏立花. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组3种沉积物重力流及其含油气性[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(3): 16 -21 .
[10] 刘云, 卢渊,伊向艺,张俊良,张锦良,王振喜. 天然气水合物预测模型及其影响因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(3): 124 -127 .