岩性油气藏 ›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6): 37–44.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20180605

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

古潜山周缘滩坝沉积模式与岩性油藏勘探实践——以南苏丹Melut盆地Ruman地区Galhak组为例

陈彬滔1,2, 史忠生1, 薛罗1, 马轮1, 赵艳军3, 何巍巍1, 王磊1, 史江龙1   

  1. 1. 中国石油勘探开发研究院 西北分院, 兰州 730020;
    2. 中国石油天然气集团公司 油藏描述重点实验室, 兰州 730020;
    3. 中油国际尼罗河公司, 喀土穆 10687, 苏丹
  • 收稿日期:2018-04-17 修回日期:2018-09-20 出版日期:2018-11-16 发布日期:2018-11-16
  • 第一作者:陈彬滔(1985-),男,硕士,工程师,主要从事储层沉积学方面的研究工作。地址:(730020)甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号。Email:tobychencugb@foxmail.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目“陆相湖盆斜坡带顺坡流与沿坡流相互作用机理及沉积构型响应”(编号:41072084)资助

Depositional models and lithologic reservoir exploration of sandy beach-bar around buried-hill: a case from Galhak Formation in Ruman region of Melut Basin, South Sudan

CHEN Bintao1,2, SHI Zhongsheng1, XUE Luo1, MA Lun1, ZHAO Yanjun3, HE Weiwei1, WANG Lei1, SHI Jianglong1   

  1. 1. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development-Northwest, Lanzhou 730020, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Reservoir Description, CNPC, Lanzhou 730020, China;
    3. CNPC International Nile Limited, Khartoum 10687, Sudan
  • Received:2018-04-17 Revised:2018-09-20 Online:2018-11-16 Published:2018-11-16

摘要: Melut盆地历经了近20年的构造圈闭勘探,目前可钻的剩余构造圈闭已十分有限,为应对储量和产量递减,亟待开展岩性油藏等新领域的探索。基于古地貌恢复、物源体系、单井微相、砂体展布等分析,综合青海湖现代沉积调查结果,提出Ruman潜山周缘白垩系Galhak组发育大型滩坝沉积,建立了潜山隆起周缘型和水下潜山台地型2类沉积模式,认为长轴三角洲前端侧翼的古潜山地貌所造就的高能滨浅湖环境是滩坝沉积的关键控制因素。Galhak组沉积初期,因强烈断层掀斜作用,Ruman潜山短暂露出水面,基岩-长轴三角洲复合供源,发育大型坝砂,单层厚度10~20 m,面积约10 km2;随后,因相对湖平面上升,Ruman潜山没入水下,发育水下潜山台地型滩坝,长轴三角洲单一供源,以大面积薄层滩砂为主,局部发育厚层坝砂。滩坝砂体与上倾尖灭线、下伏Renk组烃源岩、顶板洪泛泥岩、侧向湖相泥岩封隔等配套,形成上倾尖灭、孤立透镜体等类型的岩性圈闭。滩坝沉积的提出有效指导了岩性油藏勘探,部署的多口探井获勘探发现,提升了Ruman地区的储量规模。

关键词: Melut盆地, Ruman凹陷, 滩坝沉积, 沉积模式, 青海湖现代沉积

Abstract: After almost 20 years' exploration, only a few structural traps were left for drilling in Melut Basin, South Sudan. Exploration for new areas such as lithologic reservoirs is needed to tackle the reserve and production decline. Based on analysis of palaeogeomorphic reconstruction, provenance system, mico-facies in single well, sandbodies distribution and investigation of modern deposition in Qinghai Lake, large-scale sandy beach-bars were discovered in Cretaceous Galhak Formation around Ruman buried-hill in Melut Basin. Two depositional models of buried-hill periphery and underwater buried-hill platform were built, and high energy shore and shallow lake environment caused by buried-hill topography located beside the long axis delta was considered as the main controlling factor of sandy beach-bar deposition. In the initial stage of Galhak Formation deposition, Ruman buried hill exposed for a short duration because of intense tilting of faults, where large scale of sandy bar was developed with an area of 10 km2 and a thickness of 10-20 m, the sediment source was provided by basement and long-axis delta. Ruman burial hill was sinking into the water as the relative lake level rising, sandy beach-bars of underwater buried hill platform (dominated by large area of thin layer beach-sand with thick bar-sand in local)were developed, the sediments source was supplied by long-axis delta. Beach-bar sandbodies, up-dipping pinched-out boundary, underlying source rock of Renk Formation, flooding mudstone in the top and lateral lacustrine mudstone seal were matched to form lithological traps. The discovery of sandy beach-bar guided the lithologic reservoir exploration effectively, several exploratory wells that were deployed on the basis of "beach bar" were succeeded, promoting the reserve scale of Ruman area.

Key words: Melut Basin, Ruman subbasin, sandy beach-bar, depositional model, Qinghai Lake modern sediments

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2
[1] JIANG Z X, LIU H, ZHANG S W, et al. Sedimentary characteristics of large-scale lacustrine beach-bars and their formation in the Eocene Boxing Sag of Bohai Bay Basin, East China. Sedimentology, 2011, 58(5):1087-1112.
[2] 李国斌, 姜在兴, 王升兰, 等.薄互层滩坝砂体的定量预测——以东营凹陷古近系沙四上亚段(Es4-上)为例. 中国地质, 2010, 37(6):1559-1711. LI G B, JIANG Z X, WANG S L, et al. Sedimentary characteristics and controlling factors of beach bars in the Upper submember of the Fourth Member of the Shahejie Formation in the Lijin subbasin. Geology in China, 2010, 37(6):1559-1711.
[3] 赵东娜, 朱筱敏, 董艳蕾, 等.地震沉积学在湖盆缓坡滩坝砂体预测中的应用——以准噶尔盆地车排子地区下白垩统为例. 石油勘探与开发, 2014, 41(1):55-61. ZHAO D N, ZHU X M, DONG Y L, et al. Application of seismic sedimentology to prediction of beach and bar sandbodies in gentle slope of lacustrine basin:a case study of the Lower Cretaceous in Chepaizi area, Junggar Basin, NE China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(1):55-61.
[4] 王化爱,钟建华,杨少勇,等. 柴达木盆地乌南-绿草滩地区下油砂山组滩坝砂岩特征与储层评价. 石油地球物理勘探, 2009, 44(5):597-602. WANG H A, ZHONG J H, YANG S Y, et al. Lower oil sand hill formation beach bar sandstone characteristics and reservoir evaluation in Wunan Lucaotan area, Qaidam Basin. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2009, 44(5):597-602.
[5] CASTELLE B, BONNETON P, DUPUIS H, et al. Double bar beach dynamics on the high-energy meso-macrotidal French Aquitanian Coast:a review. Marine Geology, 2007, 245(1):141-159.
[6] 操应长, 王健, 刘惠民. 利用环境敏感粒度组分分析滩坝砂体水动力学机制的初步探讨——以东营凹陷西部沙四上滩坝砂体沉积为例. 沉积学报, 2010, 28(2):274-284. CAO Y C, WANG J, LIU H M. Preliminary study on the hydrodynamic Mechanism of beach-bar sandbodies with environmentally sensitive grain size components. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2010, 28(2):274-284.
[7] 陈彬滔, 于兴河, 王天奇, 等.岱海湖盆沿坡流与顺坡流相互作用的沉积响应.地球科学——中国地质大学学报, 2014, 39(4):399-410. CHEN B T, YU X H, WANG T Q, et al. Sedimentary response to interaction between downslope and along slope currents in Daihai Lake, North China. Earth Science:Journal of China University of Geosciences, 2014, 39(4):399-410.
[8] 姜在兴, 王雯雯, 王俊辉, 等.风动力场对沉积体系的作用. 沉积学报, 2017, 35(5):863-876. JIANG Z X, WANG W W, WANG J H, et al. The influence of wind field on depostional systems. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2017, 35(5):863-876.
[9] 王永诗, 刘惠民, 高永进, 等. 断陷湖盆滩坝砂体成因与成藏:以东营凹陷沙四上亚段为例. 地学前缘, 2012, 19(1):100-107. WANG Y S, LIU H M, GAO Y J, et al. Sandbody genesis and hydrocarbon accumulation mechanism of beach-bar reservoir in faulted-lacustrine-basins:a case study from the upper of the fourth member of Shahejie Formation,Dongying Sag. Earth Science Frontiers, 2012, 19(1):100-107.
[10] 袁静, 梁绘媛, 谭明友, 等. 惠民凹陷南坡沙四上亚段滩坝砂体沉积特征及形成条件.石油与天然气地质, 2014, 35(3):410-416. YUAN J, LIANG H Y, TAN M Y, et al. Sedimentary characteristics and forming conditions of beach-bar sandbodies in the upper fourth member of the Shahejie Formation in the south slope of the Huimin Sag. Oil & Gas Geology, 2014, 35(3):410-416.
[11] 卫平生, 潘树新, 陈彬滔, 等.湖泊岸线带直坝和斜坝:形成机制与沉积特征.天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(11):1681-1688. WEI P S, PAN S X, CHEN B T, et al. Lakeshore oblique and orthogonal bars:sedimentary features and formation mechanism. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2014, 25(11):1681-1688.
[12] 高红灿, 肖斌, 郑荣才, 等. 白音查干凹陷下白垩统腾格尔组砾质滩坝沉积特征.石油与天然气地质, 2015, 36(4):612-620. GAO H C, XIAO B, ZHENG R C, et al. Sedimentary characteristics of gravelly beach-bar in the Lower Cretaceous Tenggeer Formation of Baiyinchagan sag, Erlian Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 2015, 36(4):612-620.
[13] 胡晨林, 张元福, 姜在兴, 等.风浪作用下鄱阳湖现代滨岸滩坝的形态变化. 石油学报, 2015, 36(12):1543-1552. HU C L, ZHANG Y F, JIANG Z X, et al. Morphologic changes in modern onshore beach bar of Poyang Lake under wind and wave actions. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(12):1543-1552.
[14] 韩元红, 郝乐伟, 王琪, 等.青海湖近岸现代沉积滩坝主要类型及沉积特征.古地理学报, 2016, 18(5):759-768. HAN Y H, HAO L W, WANG Q, et al. Sedimentary characteristics and types of beach bars deposited in modern times in nearshore of Qinghai Lake. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2016, 18(5):759-768.
[15] 姜在兴. 风场-物源-盆地系统沉积动力学:沉积体系成因解释与分布预测新概念.北京:科学出版社, 2016:1-139. JIANG Z X. Wind-source-basin system sedimentary dynamics:New concept of explaining the origin and predicting the distribution of depositional systems. Beijing:Science Press, 2016:1-139.
[16] 朱筱敏, 信荃麟, 张晋仁.断陷湖盆滩坝储集体沉积特征及沉积模式. 沉积学报, 1994, 12(2):20-27. ZHU X M, XIN Q L, ZHANG J R. Sedimentary characteristics and models of the beach bar reservoirs in faulted down lacustrine basins. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1994, 12(2):20-27.
[17] 陈世悦,杨剑萍,操应长. 惠民凹陷西部下第三系沙河街组两种滩坝沉积特征. 煤田地质与勘探, 2000, 28(3):1-4. CHEN S Y, YANG J P, CAO Y C. Sedimentary characteristics of two kinds of beach bars of Oligocene Shahejie Formation in western Huimin Depression, China. Coal Geology and Exploration, 2000, 28(3):1-4.
[18] 邓宏文, 高晓鹏, 赵宁, 等.济阳坳陷北部断陷湖盆陆源碎屑滩坝成因类型、分布规律与成藏特征.古地理学报, 2010, 12(6):737-747. DENG H W, GAO X P, ZHAO N, et al. Genetic types, distribution patterns and hydrocarbon accumulation in terrigenous beach and bar in northern faulted-lacustrine-basin of Jiyang Depression. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2010, 12(6):737-747.
[19] 史忠生, 薛罗, 牛慧赟, 等.中非Melut盆地远源岩性油藏成藏条件与勘探对策.中国石油勘探, 2017, 22(6):87-95. SHI Z S, XUE L, NIU H Y, et al. Accumulation conditions of far-source lithologic reservoirs and exploration strategy in Melut Basin, Central Africa. China Petroleum Exploration, 2017, 22(6):87-95.
[20] 王国林, 史忠生, 赵艳军, 等. 南苏丹Melut盆地北部地区岩性油藏成藏条件及勘探启示. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(4):37-45. WANG G L, SHI Z S, ZHAO Y J, et al. Lithologic reservoir forming conditions and its exploration implication in northern Melut Basin, South Sudan. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(4):37-45.
[21] 吴冬, 朱筱敏, 刘常妮, 等. Fula凹陷中央转换带对岩性油藏勘探的意义——以Abu Gabra组为例. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(4):64-72. WU D, ZHU X M, LIU C N, et al. Significance of central transfer zone on lithologic reservoir exploration:a case of Abu Gabra Formation in Fula Sag, Muglad Basin, Sudan. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(4):64-72.
[1] 牛成民, 惠冠洲, 杜晓峰, 官大勇, 王冰洁, 王启明, 张宏国. 辽中凹陷西斜坡古近系东三段湖底扇发育模式及大油田发现[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 33-42.
[2] 王天海, 许多年, 吴涛, 关新, 谢再波, 陶辉飞. 准噶尔盆地沙湾凹陷三叠系百口泉组沉积相展布特征及沉积模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 98-110.
[3] 马峰, 庞文珠, 赵文光, 张斌, 赵艳军, 薛罗, 郑茜, 陈彬滔. 南苏丹境内裂谷盆地源上构造-岩性油藏成藏主控因素与成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 92-105.
[4] 刘国勇, 许多年, 胡婷婷, 潘树新, 潘拓, 王国栋, 马永平, 关新. 准噶尔盆地沙湾凹陷侏罗系八道湾组滩砂的发现及石油地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 1-10.
[5] 张昌民, 张祥辉, 朱锐, 冯文杰, 尹太举, 尹艳树, Adrian J. HARTLEY. 分支河流体系研究进展及应用前景展望[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 11-25.
[6] 付文俊, 张昌民, 冀东升, 娄林, 刘家乐, 王绪龙. 准噶尔盆地南安集海河剖面中侏罗统头屯河组浅水三角洲沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(4): 145-160.
[7] 薛罗, 史忠生, 马轮, 赵艳军, 岳世俊, 洪亮, 王磊, 雷明. 南苏丹Melut盆地北部地区中—新生界稠油成藏模式及勘探潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 76-85.
[8] 隋立伟, 杨文璐, 李军辉, 樊晓东, 姜洪福, 文全, 张大智, 袁勇. 断陷湖盆滩坝沉积特征及其控藏作用——以塔南凹陷白垩系铜钵庙组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(5): 100-109.
[9] 刘宗堡, 李雪, 郑荣华, 刘化清, 杨占龙, 曹松. 浅水三角洲前缘亚相储层沉积特征及沉积模式——以大庆长垣萨北油田北二区萨葡高油层为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(1): 1-13.
[10] 杨丽莎, 陈彬滔, 马轮, 史忠生, 薛罗, 王磊, 史江龙, 赵艳军. 陆相湖盆坳陷期源—汇系统的要素特征及耦合关系——以南苏丹Melut盆地北部坳陷新近系Jimidi组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 27-38.
[11] 史忠生, 庞文珠, 陈彬滔, 薛罗, 赵艳军, 马轮. 南苏丹Melut盆地下组合近源白垩系成藏模式与勘探潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5): 23-33.
[12] 彭军, 褚江天, 陈友莲, 文舰, 李亚丁, 邓思思. 四川盆地高石梯—磨溪地区下寒武统沧浪铺组沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4): 12-22.
[13] 黄健玲, 傅强, 邱旭明, 赵世杰, 李林祥. 咸化断陷湖盆混积岩特征及沉积模式——以金湖凹陷阜二段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 54-66.
[14] 张家强, 李士祥, 周新平, 梁益财, 郭睿良, 闫灿灿, 陈俊霖, 李树同. 志丹地区长82砂层组缓坡浅水三角洲前缘砂体发育模式及成因[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(1): 36-50.
[15] 仲米虹, 唐武. 前陆盆地隆后坳陷区湖底扇沉积特征及主控因素——以塔北轮南地区三叠系为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(5): 18-28.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 段天向, 刘晓梅, 张亚军, 肖述琴. Petrel 建模中的几点认识[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 102 -107 .
[2] 张立秋. 南二区东部二类油层上返层系组合优化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 116 -120 .
[3] 张娣,侯中健,王亚辉,王莹,王春联. 板桥—北大港地区沙河街组沙一段湖相碳酸盐岩沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(4): 92 -97 .
[4] 樊怀才,李晓平,窦天财,吴欣袁. 应力敏感效应的气井流量动态特征研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(4): 130 -134 .
[5] 田淑芳,张鸿文. 应用生命周期旋回理论预测辽河油田石油探明储量增长趋势[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 98 -100 .
[6] 杨凯,郭肖. 裂缝性低渗透油藏三维两相黑油数值模拟研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(3): 118 -121 .
[7] 翟中喜,秦伟军,郭金瑞. 油气充满度与储层通道渗流能力的定量关系———以泌阳凹陷双河油田岩性油藏为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(4): 92 -95 .
[8] 戚明辉,陆正元,袁帅,李新华. 塔河油田12 区块油藏水体来源及出水特征分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(4): 115 -119 .
[9] 李相博,陈启林,刘化清,完颜容,慕敬魁,廖建波,魏立花. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组3种沉积物重力流及其含油气性[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(3): 16 -21 .
[10] 刘云, 卢渊,伊向艺,张俊良,张锦良,王振喜. 天然气水合物预测模型及其影响因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(3): 124 -127 .