岩性油气藏 ›› 2019, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3): 95–104.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20190311

• 勘探技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

四川盆地丁山区块页岩气储层关键参数测井评价方法

严伟1, 刘帅1, 冯明刚1, 张冲2, 范树平1   

  1. 1. 中国石化勘探分公司 勘探研究院, 成都 610041;
    2. 长江大学 油气资源与勘探技术教育部重点实验室, 武汉 430100
  • 收稿日期:2018-11-26 修回日期:2019-01-29 出版日期:2019-05-21 发布日期:2019-05-06
  • 第一作者:严伟(1984-),男,硕士,工程师,主要从事测井资料解释与储量研究方面的工作。地址:(610041)四川省成都市高新区吉泰路688号中石化西南科研办公基地A座810室。Email:yanweimako@126.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重大科技专项“页岩气勘探地球物理技术研究”(编号:2017ZX05036005)与油气资源与勘探技术教育部重点实验室(长江大学)开放基金资助项目“页岩气储层饱和度评价方法与应用研究”(编号:K2018-11)联合资助

Well logging evaluation methods of key parameters for shale gas reservoir in Dingshan block,Sichuan Basin

YAN Wei1, LIU Shuai1, FENG Minggang1, ZHANG Chong2, FAN Shuping1   

  1. 1. Research Institute of Exploration, Sinopec Exploration Company, Chengdu 610041, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Exploration Technologies for Oil and Gas Resources(Yangtze University), Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430100, China
  • Received:2018-11-26 Revised:2019-01-29 Online:2019-05-21 Published:2019-05-06

摘要: 四川盆地丁山区块是一个页岩气千亿方级增储阵地,但与其他页岩气区块相比,丁山区块储层的测井曲线响应与储层参数相关性较低,且由于地层压力变化较大,易造成井眼崩落,其他区块适用的以密度曲线为主导的参数评价系统在该区块受到了挑战。对丁山区块重点井测井响应特征与岩心实验数据的关系开展了研究,寻求其相关性,结合经验统计法以及视骨架密度法对储层参数加以评价,建立了有机碳含量、孔隙度、矿物含量以及含水饱和度评价模型。结果表明,能谱铀含量曲线与储层参数相关性强,且并不受到井眼崩落的影响,经与岩心实验参数对比可知,以能谱铀含量曲线为主导建立的模型计算出来的参数结果相对误差控制在8%以内,精度较高,明显优于以密度曲线为主导的模型,满足储层评价的需要,符合储量计算的要求,也为丁山区块页岩气储层的勘探开发提供了支撑。

关键词: 经验统计法, 视骨架密度法, 储层参数, 测井响应, 页岩气, 丁山区块

Abstract: Dingshan block is another shale gas source of 100 billion square meters. However, compared with other shale gas blocks, the logging response of the reservoir in Dingshan block is less correlated with the reservoir parameters, and because the formation pressure changes greatly, it is easy to cause the wellbore to collapse, resulting in that the parameter evaluation system dominated by density curve applied in other bolcks is challenged in this block. This paper analyzed the relationship between log response characteristics and core experimental data of key wells in Dingshan block to determine their correlation, and established evaluation models of organic carbon content, porosity, minerals content and water saturation by combining the empirical statistics and apparent skeletal density method. Compared with core experimental parameters, the relative error of the parameters calculated by the model based on uranium content curve is less than 8%, with high precision. So the model is significantly better than the model dominated by density curve, it can meet the needs of actual reservoir evaluation and the calculation requirements of reserves, and also provide corresponding support for the exploration and development of shale gas reservoir in Dingshan block.

Key words: empirical statistical method, apparent skeletal density method, reservoir parameter, logging response, shale gas, Dingshan block

中图分类号: 

  • TE132.2
[1] 郭旭升. 南方海相页岩气"二元富集"规律:四川盆地及周缘龙马溪组页岩气勘探实践认识. 地质学报, 2014, 88(7):1209-1218. GUO X S. Rules of two-factor enrichment for marine shale gas in southern china:Understanding from the long maxi formation shale gas in Sichuan Basin and its surrounding area. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2014, 88(7):1209-1218.
[2] 郭彤楼, 张汉荣. 四川盆地焦石坝页岩气田形成与富集高产模式. 石油勘探与开发, 2014, 41(1):28-36. GUO T L, ZHANG H R. Formation and enrichment mode of Jiaoshiba shale gas field,Sichuan Basin. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(1):28-36.
[3] 郭旭升, 郭彤楼, 魏志红, 等. 中国南方页岩气勘探评价的几点思考.中国工程科学, 2012, 14(6):101-105. GUO X S, GUO T L, WEI Z H, et al. Thoughts on shale gas exploration in southern China. Engineering Science, 2012, 14(6):101-105.
[4] 王志刚. 涪陵页岩气勘探开发重大突破与启示. 石油与天然气地质, 2015, 36(1):1-6. WANG Z G. Breakthrough of Fuling shale gas exploration and development and its inspiration. Oil & Gas Geology, 2015, 36(1):1-6.
[5] 胡东风, 张汉荣, 倪楷,等. 四川盆地东南缘海相页岩气保存条件及其主控因素. 天然气工业, 2014, 34(6):17-23. HU D F, ZHANG H R, NI K, et al. Main controlling factors for gas preservation conditions of marine shales in southeastern margins of the Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Industry, 2014, 34(6):17-23.
[6] 郭旭升. 涪陵页岩气田焦石坝区块富集机理与勘探技术. 北京:科学出版社, 2014:28-36. GUO X S. Enrichment mechanism and exploration technology of Jiaoshiba area in Fining shale gas field. Beijing:Science Press, 2014:28-36.
[7] 沈瑞, 胡志明, 郭和坤, 等. 四川盆地长宁龙马溪组页岩赋存空间及含气规律. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(5):11-17. SHEN R, HU Z M, GUO H K, et al. Storage space and gas content law of Longmaxi shale in Changning area, Sichuan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(5):11-17.
[8] 魏祥峰, 赵正宝, 王庆波, 等.川东南綦江丁山地区上奥陶统五峰组-下志留统龙马溪组页岩气地质条件综合评价. 地质评论, 2017, 63(1):153-164. WEI X F, ZHAO Z B, WANG Q B, et al. Comprehensive evaluation on geological conditions of the shale gas in Upper Ordovician Wufeng Formation-Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in Dingshan area,Qijiang, southeastern Sichuan. Geological Review, 2017, 63(1):153-164.
[9] 曹涛涛, 邓模, 刘虎, 等.可溶有机质对泥页岩储集物性的影响.岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(3):43-51. CAO T T, DENG M, LIU H, et al. Influences of soluble organic matter on reservoir properties of shale. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(3):43-51.
[10] 车世琦. 测井资料用于页岩岩相划分及识别:以涪陵气田五峰组-龙马溪组为例.岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(1):121-132. CHE S Q. Shale lithofacies identification and classification by using logging data:a case of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in Fuling Gas Field, Sichuan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(1):121-132.
[11] PAEESY Q R, CREANEY S. A practical model for organic richness from porosity and resistivity logs. AAPG Bulletin, 1990, 74(12):1777-1794.
[12] 王建国, 李忠刚, 朱智, 等. 基于测井方法的页岩有机碳含量计算. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2015, 34(3):170-174. WANG J G, LI Z G, ZHU Z, et al. Calculation of the shale TOC extents based on the well logging methods. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2015, 34(3):170-174.
[13] 宋磊, 宁正福, 丁冠阳. 基于三种常规测井方法的有机碳含量评价. 科学技术与工程, 2017, 17(29):260-265. SONG L, NING Z F, DING G Y. Evaluation of organic carbon content based on three kinds of conventional logging method. Science Technology and Engineering, 2017, 17(29):260-265.
[14] 胡曦, 王兴志, 李宜真, 等. 利用测井信息计算页岩有机质丰度:以川南长宁地区龙马溪组为例.岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(5):107-112. HU X, WANG X Z, LI Y Z, et al. Using log data to calculate the organic matter abundance in shale:a case study from Longmaxi Formation in Changning area, southern Sichuan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(5):107-112.
[15] 熊镭, 张超谟, 张冲, 等. A地区页岩气储层总有机碳含量测井评价方法研究.岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(3):74-78. XIONG L, ZHANG C M, ZHANG C, et al. Research on logging evaluation method of TOC content of shale gas reservoir in A area. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2014, 26(3):74-78.
[16] 钟光海, 谢冰, 周肖.页岩气测井评价方法研究:以四川盆地蜀南地区为例.岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(4):96-102. ZHONG G H, XIE B, ZHOU X. Well logging evaluation methods of shale gas reservoir:a case study from Shu nan area, Sichuan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2015, 27(4):96-102.
[17] ZHU L Q, ZHANG C, GUO C, et al. Calculating the total porosity of shale reservoirs by combining conventional logging and elemental logging to eliminate the effects of gas saturation. Petrophysics, 2018, 59(2):162-184.
[18] 徐壮, 石万忠, 翟刚毅, 等.涪陵地区页岩总孔隙度测井预测. 石油学报, 2017, 38(5):533-543. XU Z, SHI W Z, ZHAI G Y, et al. Well logging prediction for porosity of shale in Fuling area. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2017, 38(5):533-543.
[19] 黄小平, 柴婧. 阿尔奇公式在泥页岩地层含油饱和度计算中的应用:以沾化凹陷沙三段下亚段为例. 油气地质与采收率, 2014, 21(4):58-61. HUANG X P, CHAI J. A practical discussion on oil saturation calculation using Archie formula in shale formation:Example from lower Sha 3 member of Zhanhua Sag. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2014, 21(4):58-61.
[20] 刘帅, 冯明刚, 严伟. 非电法测井计算页岩储层含水饱和度方法研究:以涪陵页岩气田焦石坝区块为例.科学技术与工程, 2017, 17(27):127-132. LIU S, FENG M G, YAN W. The non-electrical logging calculation shale reservoir water saturation method research:a case on Jiaoshiba area of Fuling shale gas field. Science Technology and Engineering, 2017, 17(27):127-132.
[21] 张晋言, 李淑荣, 王利滨, 等.页岩气测井电性解析及含气性评价:以四川盆地涪陵地区龙马溪组一段-五峰组为例. 天然气勘探与开发, 2018, 41(3):33-41. ZHANG J Y, LI S R, WANG L B, et al. Electrical-logging analysis and evaluation on gas-bearing property of shale gas:an example from Longmaxi 1 Member-Wufeng Formation, Fuling area, Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2018, 41(3):33-41.
[22] 付杰. 两种页岩气含气饱和度计算的方法. 科技经济导刊, 2016, 2(32):56-57. FU J. Method for calculating gas saturation of two shale gas. Science and Technology Economic Guide, 2016, 2(32):56-57.
[23] 田云英, 夏宏泉. 基于多矿物模型分析的最优化测井解释. 西南石油学院学报, 2006, 28(4):8-11. TIAN Y Y, XIA H Q. The optimal logging explanation base on multi-minerals model analysis. Journal of Southwest Petroleum Institute, 2006, 28(4):8-11.
[24] 龚小平, 唐洪明, 赵峰, 等. 四川盆地龙马溪组页岩储层孔隙结构的定量表征. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(3):48-56. GONG X P, TANG H M, ZHAO F, et al. Quantitative characterization of pore structure in shale reservoir of Longmaxi Formation in Sichuan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(3):48-56.
[25] 李可, 王兴志, 张馨艺, 等. 四川盆地东部下志留统龙马溪组页岩储层特征及影响因素. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(5):52-58. LI K, WANG X Z, ZHANG X Y, et al. Shale reservoir characteristics and influencing factors of the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in the eastern Sichuan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(5):52-58.
[26] 张晋言, 李淑荣, 王利滨, 等. 低阻页岩气层含气饱和度计算新方法. 天然气工业, 2017, 37(4):34-41. ZHANG J Y, LI S R, WANG L B, et al. A new method for calculating gas saturation of low-resistivity shale gas reservoirs. Natural Gas Industry, 2017, 37(4):34-41.
[27] 魏志红, 魏祥峰. 页岩不同类型孔隙的含气性差异:以四川盆地焦石坝地区五峰组-龙马溪组为例. 天然气工业, 2014, 34(6):37-41. WEI Z H, WEI X F. Comparison of gas-bearing property between different pore types of shale:a case from the Upper Ordovician Wufeng and Longmaxi Fms in the Jiaoshiba area, Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Industry, 2014, 34(6):37-41.
[28] 胡博文, 李斌, 鲁东升, 等.页岩气储层特征及含气性主控因素:以湘西北保靖地区龙马溪组为例. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(3):83-91. HU B W, LI B, LU D S, et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors of shale gas reservoirs:a case from Longmaxi Formation in Baojing area, NW Hunan province. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(3):83-91.
[29] 朱汉卿, 贾爱林, 位云生, 等. 基于氩气吸附的页岩纳米级孔隙结构特征.岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(2):77-84. ZHU H Q, JIA A L, WEI Y S, et al. Nano pore structure characteristics of shale based on Ar adsorption. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(2):77-84.
[30] 余川, 周洵, 方光建, 等. 地层温压条件下页岩吸附性能变化特征:以渝东北地区龙马溪组为例. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(6):10-17. YU C, ZHOU X, FANG G J, et al. Absorptivity of shale under the formation temperature and pressure:a case of Longmaxi Formation in northeastern Chongqing. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(6):10-17.
[31] 陈居凯, 朱炎铭, 崔兆帮, 等. 川南龙马溪组页岩孔隙结构综合表征及其分形特征.岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(1):55-62. CHEN J K, ZHU Y M, CUI Z B, et al. Pore structure and fractal characteristics of Longmaxi shale in southern Sichuan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(1):55-62.
[1] 闫建平, 来思俣, 郭伟, 石学文, 廖茂杰, 唐洪明, 胡钦红, 黄毅. 页岩气井地质工程套管变形类型及影响因素研究进展[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 1-14.
[2] 杨学锋, 赵圣贤, 刘勇, 刘绍军, 夏自强, 徐飞, 范存辉, 李雨桐. 四川盆地宁西地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气富集主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 99-110.
[3] 包汉勇, 赵帅, 张莉, 刘皓天. 川东红星地区中上二叠统页岩气勘探成果及方向展望[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 12-24.
[4] 申有义, 王凯峰, 唐书恒, 张松航, 郗兆栋, 杨晓东. 沁水盆地榆社—武乡区块二叠系煤系页岩储层地质建模及“甜点”预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 98-108.
[5] 段逸飞, 赵卫卫, 杨天祥, 李富康, 李慧, 王嘉楠, 刘钰晨. 鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区二叠系山西组页岩气源储特征及聚集规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 72-83.
[6] 程静, 闫建平, 宋东江, 廖茂杰, 郭伟, 丁明海, 罗光东, 刘延梅. 川南长宁地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气储层低电阻率响应特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 31-39.
[7] 杨博伟, 石万忠, 张晓明, 徐笑丰, 刘俞佐, 白卢恒, 杨洋, 陈相霖. 黔南地区下石炭统打屋坝组页岩气储层孔隙结构特征及含气性评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 45-58.
[8] 郭海峰, 肖坤叶, 程晓东, 杜业波, 杜旭东, 倪国辉, 李贤兵, 计然. 乍得Bongor盆地花岗岩潜山裂缝型储层有效渗透率计算方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 117-126.
[9] 魏全超, 李小佳, 李峰, 郝景宇, 邓双林, 吴娟, 邓宾, 王道军. 四川盆地米仓山前缘旺苍地区下寒武统筇竹寺组裂缝脉体发育特征及意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 62-70.
[10] 杨跃明, 张少敏, 金涛, 明盈, 郭蕊莹, 王兴志, 韩璐媛. 川南地区二叠系龙潭组页岩储层特征及勘探潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(1): 1-11.
[11] 闫建平, 罗静超, 石学文, 钟光海, 郑马嘉, 黄毅, 唐洪明, 胡钦红. 川南泸州地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩裂缝发育模式及意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 60-71.
[12] 何玉, 周星, 李少轩, 丁洪波. 渤海湾盆地渤中凹陷古近系地层超压成因及测井响应特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(3): 60-69.
[13] 邱晨, 闫建平, 钟光海, 李志鹏, 范存辉, 张悦, 胡钦红, 黄毅. 四川盆地泸州地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩沉积微相划分及测井识别[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(3): 117-130.
[14] 张梦琳, 李郭琴, 何嘉, 衡德. 川西南缘天宫堂构造奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气富集主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(2): 141-151.
[15] 尹兴平, 蒋裕强, 付永红, 张雪梅, 雷治安, 陈超, 张海杰. 渝西地区五峰组—龙马溪组龙一1亚段页岩岩相及储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 41-51.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . 2022年 34卷 2 期 封面[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(2): 0 .
[2] 李在光, 李琳. 以井数据为基础的AutoCAD 自动编绘图方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 84 -89 .
[3] 程玉红, 郭彦如, 郑希民, 房乃珍, 马玉虎. 井震多因素综合确定的解释方法与应用效果[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 97 -101 .
[4] 刘俊田,靳振家,李在光,覃新平,郭 林,王 波,刘玉香. 小草湖地区岩性油气藏主控因素分析及油气勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 44 -47 .
[5] 商昌亮,付守献. 黄土塬山地三维地震勘探应用实例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 106 -110 .
[6] 王昌勇, 郑荣才, 王建国, 曹少芳, 肖明国. 准噶尔盆地西北缘八区下侏罗统八道湾组沉积特征及演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 37 -42 .
[7] 王克, 刘显阳, 赵卫卫, 宋江海, 时振峰, 向惠. 济阳坳陷阳信洼陷古近纪震积岩特征及其地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 54 -59 .
[8] 孙洪斌, 张凤莲. 辽河坳陷古近系构造-沉积演化特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 60 -65 .
[9] 李传亮. 地层抬升会导致异常高压吗?[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 124 -126 .
[10] 魏钦廉,郑荣才,肖玲,马国富,窦世杰,田宝忠. 阿尔及利亚438b 区块三叠系Serie Inferiere 段储层平面非均质性研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(2): 24 -28 .