岩性油气藏 ›› 2019, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3): 105–112.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20190312

• 勘探技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

薄互层火成岩地震响应特征及厚度预测

刘恭利, 韩自军, 段新意, 甄宗玉   

  1. 中海石油(中国)有限公司天津分公司, 天津 300459
  • 收稿日期:2018-11-06 修回日期:2019-01-28 出版日期:2019-05-21 发布日期:2019-05-06
  • 第一作者:刘恭利(1986-),男,硕士,工程师,主要从事地球物理的构造解释和储层预测方面的研究工作。地址:(300459)天津市滨海新区海川路2121号渤海石油研究院。Email:liugl28@cnooc.com.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重大科技专项“渤海海域勘探新领域及关键技术研究”(编号:2016ZX05024-003)资助

Seismic response characteristics and thickness prediction of thin interbedded igneous rocks

LIU Gongli, HAN Zijun, DUAN Xinyi, ZHEN Zongyu   

  1. Tianjin Branch, CNOOC, Tianjin 300459, China
  • Received:2018-11-06 Revised:2019-01-28 Online:2019-05-21 Published:2019-05-06

摘要: 渤海地区B油田在古近系目的层段内广泛发育多种岩相的火成岩,这种喷发型为主的火成岩多以薄互层形式存在,但其厚度具有不均匀性,横向变化较大,准确描述火成岩厚度分布对后续井位部署和储量评价均具有至关重要的作用。对油田范围内已钻井火成岩厚度及组合规律进行分析,认为对油田勘探开发影响较大的是薄互层形式的溢流相火成岩,系统研究薄互层形式下的组合结构、毛厚度、及净毛比3种因素对火成岩地震响应特征的影响,并通过实际数据建立了不同的分析模型,认为净毛比是振幅响应的主控因素,利用实际子波正演建立净毛比和响应振幅的关系,并采用约束稀疏脉冲反演方法对区域范围内的火成岩厚度进行预测,结果显示,预测厚度与实钻厚度吻合较好,有利于定量化研究火成岩对下伏构造的影响程度。该研究成果对后续勘探及储量评价具有较好的指导意义。

关键词: 薄互层, 火成岩, 地震响应, 厚度预测, 古近系, 渤海地区

Abstract: Igneous rocks are widely developed in Paleogene in B oilfield of Bohai Sea area. The igneous rocks dominated by eruption mainly exist in the form of thin interbeds, and their lateral thickness varies largely. It is very important to accurately describe the thickness distribution of igneous rocks for well location deployment and reserves evaluation. Based on the known thickness distribution and combination law of igneous rocks in drilled wells, it is considered that overflow igneous rocks in the form of thin interbeds have a great influence on oil field exploration and development. The influencing factors such as combination, total thickness and igneous rock ratio were systematically studied, which lead to different seismic response characteristics of thin interbedded igneous rocks. Based on real data, different analysis models were established to demonstrate the influences of the three factors. It is considered that igneous rock ratio is the main controlling factor affecting the amplitude of seismic response. Relationship between igneous rock ratios and amplitude was established by using actual wavelet forward modeling, and the thickness of thin-interbed igneous rocks was predicted using constrained sparse pulse inversion. The result shows that the predicted thickness is in good agreement with actual drilling thickness, so this method is helpful to quantitatively study the influence of igneous rocks on underlying structures. The research results have good guiding significance for further exploration and reserves evaluation.

Key words: thin interbed, igneous rock, seismic response, thickness prediction, Paleogene, Bohai Sea area

中图分类号: 

  • P631.4
[1] 崔泽宏, 汤良杰. 塔河地区火山岩地震相及勘探潜力. 新疆石油地质, 2010, 31(3):252-254. CUI Z H, TANG L J. Seismic facies and exploration potential of volcanic rocks in the Tahe area. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2010, 31(3):252-254.
[2] 邹才能, 赵文智, 贾承造, 等. 中国沉积盆地火山岩油气藏形成与分布. 石油勘探与开发, 2008, 35(3):257-271. ZOU C N, ZHAO W Z, JIA C Z, et al. Formation and distribution of volcanic reservoirs in China's sedimentary basins. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2008, 35(3):257-271.
[3] 郭涛, 杨波, 陈磊, 等. 岩浆岩三维精细刻画:黄河口凹陷南斜坡渤中34-9油田的发现. 中国海上油气, 2016, 28(2):71-77. GUO T, YANG B, CHEN L, et al. 3D fine description of magmatic rocks:The discovery of BZ 34-9 oilfield in the southern slope of Huanghekou Sag. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2016, 28(2):71-77.
[4] 吴庆勋, 王粤川, 韦阿娟, 等. 渤海海域中生代火山岩喷发旋回划分及与油气的关系.中国海上油气, 2017, 29(2):18-26. WU Q X, WANG Y C, WEI A J, et al. Division of Mesozoic volcanic rock eruption cycle and its relationship with oil and gas in the Bohai sea. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2017, 29(2):18-26.
[5] 武强, 王应斌, 张中巧, 等. 歧中北-沙西火成岩形成机制及油气地质意义. 断块油气田, 2012, 19(4):467-471. WU Q, WANG Y B, ZHANG Z Q, et al. Formation mechanism of igneous rock and its geological significance in QizhongbeiShaxi area. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2012, 19(4):467-471.
[6] 田晓平, 陈国成, 杨庆红, 等.渤海海域古近系碎屑岩储层展布定量研究. 中国海上油气, 2016, 28(2):71-77. TIAN X P, CHEN G C, YANG Q H, et al. A quantitative study on distribution of Paleogene clastic reservoir in Bohai water. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2016, 28(2):71-77.
[7] 简晓玲, 刘金萍, 王改云, 等.北黄海盆地东部坳陷火成岩地震相识别与分布预测.海洋地质前沿, 2014, 30(11):314-319. JIAN X L, LIU J P, WANG G Y, et al. The Meso-Cenozoic structural styles of the eastern depression in the North Yellow Sea Basin. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2014, 30(11):314-319.
[8] 张玉芬. 影响薄互层地震反射波特征因素分析. 地质科技情报, 1998, 17(3):101-106. ZHANG Y F. Factors analysis affecting seismic reflection characteristics of thin interbedding. Geological Science and Technology Information, 1998, 17(3):101-106.
[9] 孙淑艳, 李艳菊, 彭莉, 等.火成岩地震识别及构造描述方法研究. 特种油气藏, 2003, 10(1):47-54. SUN S Y, LI Y J, PENG L, et al. Study on seismic identification and structure description of igneous rock. Special Oil and Gas Reservoir, 2003, 10(1):47-54.
[10] 黄玉龙, 单俊峰, 边伟华, 等. 辽河坳陷中基性火成岩相分类及储集意义. 石油勘探与开发, 2014, 41(6):671-680. HUANG Y L, SHAN J F, BIAN W H, et al. Classification and reservoir significance of medium-based igneous facies in Liaohe depression. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(6):671-680.
[11] CAS R A F, WRIGHT J V. Volcanic successions modern and ancient. London:Allen & Unwin, 1987:59-333.
[12] 金伯禄, 张希友. 长白山火山地质研究. 长春:东北朝鲜民族教育出版社, 1994:40-49. JIN B L, ZHANG X Y. Study on volcanic geology of Changbai Mountain. Changchun:Northeast Korean National Education Press, 1994:40-49.
[13] 谢家莹, 陶奎元. 中国东南大陆中生代火山地质及火山-侵入杂岩. 北京:地质出版社, 1996:40-71. XIE J Y, TAO K Y. Mesozoic volcanic geology and volcanoes of southeastern China. Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 1996:40-71.
[14] 王璞珺, 迟元林, 刘万洙, 等.松辽盆地火山岩相类型、特征和储层意义. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2003, 33(4):449-456. WANG P J, CHI Y L, LIU W Z, et al. Volcanic facies of the Songliao Basin:Classification, characteristics and reservoir significance. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2003, 33(4):449-456.
[15] 孔垂显, 邱子刚, 卢志远, 等. 准噶尔盆地东部石炭系火山岩岩体划分. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(6):15-22. KONG C X, QIU Z G, LU Z Y, et al. Division of Carboniferous volcanic rock mass in eastern Junggar Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(6):15-22.
[16] 何贤英, 刘勇, 许学龙, 等. 西泉地区石炭系火山岩储层主控因素及有利储层预测. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(3):42-51. HE X Y, LIU Y, XU X L, et al. Controlling factors of Carboniferous volcanic reservoirs and favorable reservoir prediction in Xiquan area, Junggar Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(3):42-51.
[17] 林承焰, 梁昌国, 任丽华, 等.碎屑岩潜山沉积相及其与裂缝发育的关系.中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 32(4):1-6. LIN C Y, LIANG C G, REN L H, et al. Sedimentary facies and relation to degree of fracture development of clastic buried hills. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science), 2008, 32(4):1-6.
[18] 白晓寅, 韩长春, 贺永红, 等.银额盆地哈日凹陷火成岩发育特征及其成藏作用. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(6):18-26. BAI X Y, HAN C C, HE Y H, et al. Development characteristics of igneous rocks and its role in hydrocarbon accumulation in Hari Sag, Yingen-Ejinaqi Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(6):18-26.
[1] 周自强, 朱正平, 潘仁芳, 董於, 金吉能. 基于波形相控反演的致密砂岩储层模拟预测方法——以黄骅坳陷沧东凹陷南部古近系孔二段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 77-86.
[2] 张磊, 李莎, 罗波波, 吕伯强, 谢敏, 陈新平, 陈冬霞, 邓彩云. 东濮凹陷北部古近系沙三段超压岩性油气藏成藏机理[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 57-70.
[3] 方旭庆, 钟骑, 张建国, 李军亮, 孟涛, 姜在兴, 赵海波. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷古近系沙三下亚段旋回地层学分析及地层划分[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 19-30.
[4] 冯斌, 黄晓波, 何幼斌, 李华, 罗进雄, 李涛, 周晓光. 渤海湾盆地庙西北地区古近系沙河街组三段源-汇系统重建[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 84-95.
[5] 朱康乐, 高岗, 杨光达, 张东伟, 张莉莉, 朱毅秀, 李婧. 辽河坳陷清水洼陷古近系沙河街组深层烃源岩特征及油气成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 146-157.
[6] 西智博, 廖建平, 高荣锦, 周晓龙, 雷文文. 辽河坳陷陈家断裂带北部构造演化解析及油气成藏[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 127-136.
[7] 王亚, 刘宗宾, 路研, 王永平, 刘超. 基于SSOM的流动单元划分方法及生产应用——以渤海湾盆地F油田古近系沙三中亚段湖底浊积水道为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 160-169.
[8] 牛成民, 惠冠洲, 杜晓峰, 官大勇, 王冰洁, 王启明, 张宏国. 辽中凹陷西斜坡古近系东三段湖底扇发育模式及大油田发现[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 33-42.
[9] 刘亚明, 王丹丹, 田作基, 张志伟, 王童奎, 王朝锋, 阳孝法, 周玉冰. 巴西桑托斯盆地复杂碳酸盐岩油田火成岩发育特征及预测方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 127-137.
[10] 李盛谦, 曾溅辉, 刘亚洲, 李淼, 焦盼盼. 东海盆地西湖凹陷孔雀亭地区古近系平湖组储层成岩作用及孔隙演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 49-61.
[11] 胡望水, 高飞跃, 李明, 郭志杰, 王世超, 李相明, 李圣明, 揭琼. 渤海湾盆地廊固凹陷古近系沙河街组油藏单元精细表征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 92-99.
[12] 张振华, 张小军, 钟大康, 苟迎春, 张世铭. 柴达木盆地西北部南翼山地区古近系下干柴沟组上段储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 29-39.
[13] 曾旭, 卞从胜, 沈瑞, 周可佳, 刘伟, 周素彦, 汪晓鸾. 渤海湾盆地歧口凹陷古近系沙三段页岩油储层非线性渗流特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 40-50.
[14] 郑彬, 董翱, 张源智, 张毅, 苏珊, 张士超, 樊津津, 骆垠山. 济阳坳陷渤南洼陷古近系沙河街组流体压力建场过程及其石油地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 59-67.
[15] 完颜泽, 龙国徽, 杨巍, 柴京超, 马新民, 唐丽, 赵健, 李海鹏. 柴达木盆地英雄岭地区古近系油气成藏过程及其演化特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 94-102.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨秋莲, 李爱琴, 孙燕妮, 崔攀峰. 超低渗储层分类方法探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 51 -56 .
[2] 张杰, 赵玉华. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组地震层序地层研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 71 -74 .
[3] 杨占龙, 张正刚, 陈启林, 郭精义,沙雪梅, 刘文粟. 利用地震信息评价陆相盆地岩性圈闭的关键点分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 57 -63 .
[4] 朱小燕, 李爱琴, 段晓晨, 田随良, 刘美荣. 镇北油田延长组长3 油层组精细地层划分与对比[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 82 -86 .
[5] 方朝合, 王义凤, 郑德温, 葛稚新. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系烃源岩显微组分分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 87 -90 .
[6] 韩春元,赵贤正,金凤鸣,王权,李先平,王素卿. 二连盆地地层岩性油藏“多元控砂—四元成藏—主元富集”与勘探实践(IV)——勘探实践[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 15 -20 .
[7] 戴朝成,郑荣才,文华国,张小兵. 辽东湾盆地旅大地区古近系层序—岩相古地理编图[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 39 -46 .
[8] 尹艳树,张尚峰,尹太举. 钟市油田潜江组含盐层系高分辨率层序地层格架及砂体分布规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 53 -58 .
[9] 石雪峰,杜海峰. 姬塬地区长3—长4+5油层组沉积相研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 59 -63 .
[10] 严世邦,胡望水,李瑞升,关键,李涛,聂晓红. 准噶尔盆地红车断裂带同生逆冲断裂特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 64 -68 .