岩性油气藏 ›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1): 27–35.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20200104

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

四川盆地石柱地区自流井组页岩气成藏条件与勘探前景

王登1, 余江浩1, 赵雪松1, 陈威1, 黄佳琪2, 徐聪1   

  1. 1. 湖北省地质调查院, 武汉 430034;
    2. 湖北省地质局 第四地质大队, 湖北 咸宁 437100
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-02 修回日期:2019-09-19 出版日期:2020-01-21 发布日期:2019-11-22
  • 第一作者:王登(1987-),男,硕士,工程师,主要从事页岩气方面的研究工作。地址:(430034)湖北省武汉市硚口区古田五路9号。Email:w362311767@126.com
  • 通信作者: 余江浩(1985-),男,硕士,工程师,主要从事页岩气方面的研究工作。Email:jhyu2005@126.com。
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省地勘基金项目“湖北省页岩气资源潜力评价”(编号:DKC2014-03-04)和中国地质调查局项目“中南地区页岩气资源调查评价”(编号:12120114049901)联合资助

Accumulation conditions and exploration potential of shale gas of Ziliujing Formation in Shizhu area,Sichuan Basin

WANG Deng1, YU Jianghao1, ZHAO Xuesong1, CHEN Wei1, HUANG Jiaqi2, XU Cong1   

  1. 1. Hubei Geological Survey, Wuhan 430034, China;
    2. No.4 Geological Team, Hubei Geological Bureau, Xianning 437100, Hubei, China
  • Received:2019-07-02 Revised:2019-09-19 Online:2020-01-21 Published:2019-11-22

摘要: 为研究四川盆地石柱地区自流井组页岩气的成藏条件,开展了野外地质露头调查、岩心观察、有机地球化学分析、X射线衍射测试、物性分析和扫描电镜观察等工作。结果表明:①石柱地区自流井组东岳庙段形成于半深湖相,岩性以泥页岩为主,厚度为30~95 m。②目的层泥页岩具有“有机质丰度高、热演化程度适中”等特征,TOC质量分数多为0.49%~2.02%,Ro平均为1.27%,脆性矿物质量分数平均为58.8%。③岩石中吸附气含量较高,质量体积平均为2.78 m3/t,且埋深适中,具有良好的勘探前景。④采用叠合法预测出石柱地区桥头坝—建南—上水坝一带为页岩气勘探的有利区,通过计算可以获得研究区页岩气地质资源量约为3 905亿m3。该研究成果可为四川盆地石柱地区自流井组页岩气勘探提供借鉴。

关键词: 页岩气, 成藏地质条件, 自流井组, 石柱地区, 四川盆地

Abstract: In order to study the shale gas accumulation conditions of Ziliujing Formation in Shizhu area of Sichuan Basin,field geological outcrop survey,core observation,organic geochemical analysis,X-ray diffraction test, physical property analysis and scanning electron microscopy observation were carried out. The results show that:(1)The Dongyuemiao member of Ziliujing Formation in Shizhu area was formed in semi-deep lake facies,and the lithology was dominated by shale with a thickness of 30-95 m.(2)The mudstone of the target zone was characterized by high abundance of organic matter and moderate thermal evolution. The TOC mass fraction is 0.49%-2.02%,the Ro average is 1.27%,and the brittle mineral average is 58.8%.(3)The content of adsorbed gas in rocks is high,the average mass volume is 2.78 m3/t,and the burial depth is moderate,so it has good exploration prospects.(4)The Qiaotouba-Jiannan-Shangshuiba area in Shizhu area was predicted to be a favorable area for shale gas exploration by superimposition method,and the geological resource of shale gas was estimated to be about 390.5 billion m3. The research results can provide reference for shale gas exploration of Ziliujing Formation in Shizhu area,Sichuan Basin.

Key words: shale gas, reservoir geological condition, Ziliujing Formationr, Shizhu area, Sichuan Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.1
[1] 邹才能, 董大忠, 王社教, 等.中国页岩气形成机理、地质特征及资源潜力. 石油勘探与开发, 2010, 37(6):641-653. ZOU C N, DONG D Z, WANG S J, et al. Geological characteristics, formation mechanism and resource potential of shale gas in China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2010, 37(6):641-653.
[2] 王祥, 刘玉华, 张敏, 等.页岩气形成条件及成藏影响因素. 天然气地球科学, 2010, 21(2):350-356. WANG X, LIU Y H, ZHANG M, et al. Conditions of formation and accumulation for shale gas. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2010, 21(2):350-356.
[3] 赵靖舟. 非常规油气有关概念、分类及资源潜力. 天然气地球科学, 2012, 23(3):393-406. ZHAO J Z. Conception, classification and resource potential of unconventional hydrocarbons. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2012, 23(3):393-406.
[4] MONTGOMERY S L, JARVIE D M, BOWKER K A, et al. Mississippian Barnett Shale,Fort Worth Basin,north-central Texas:Gas shale play with multitrillion cubic foot potential. AAPG Bulletin, 2005, 89(2):155-175.
[5] 李延钧, 冯媛媛, 刘欢, 等.四川盆地湖相页岩气地质特征与资源潜力. 石油勘探与开发, 2013, 40(4):423-428. LI Y J, FENG Y Y, LIU H, et al. Geological characteristics and resource potential of lacustrine shale gas in the Sichuan Basin, SW China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2013, 40(4):423-428.
[6] 朱彤, 俞凌杰, 王烽.四川盆地海相、湖相页岩气形成条件对比及开发策略. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(4):634-641. ZHU T, YU L J, WANG F. Comparative analysis of the accumulation conditions and development strategies of the marine and lacustrine shale gas from the Sichuan Basin, China. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2017, 28(4):634-641.
[7] 郭旭升, 胡东风, 李宇平, 等.海相和湖相页岩气富集机理分析与思考:以四川盆地龙马溪组和自流井组大安寨段为例. 地学前缘, 2016, 23(2):18-28. GUO X S, HU D F, LI Y B, et al. Analyses and thoughts on accumulation mechanisms of marine and lacustrine shale gas:a case study in shales of Longmaxi Formation and Daanzhai section of Ziliujing Formation in Sichuan Basin. Earth Science Frontiers, 2016, 23(2):18-28.
[8] 郭彤楼, 李宇平, 魏志红. 四川盆地元坝地区自流井组页岩气成藏条件. 天然气地球科学, 2011, 22(1):1-7. GUO T L, LI Y P, WEI Z H. Reservoir-forming conditions of shale gas in Ziliujing Formation of Yuanba area in Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2011, 22(1):1-7.
[9] 王良军, 王庆波. 四川盆地涪陵自流井组页岩气形成条件与勘探方向. 西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 43(5):757-764. WANG L J, WANG Q B. Formation conditions and explorative directions of Jurassic shale gas in Fuling Sichuan Basin. Journal of Northwest University(Natural Science Edition), 2013, 43(5):757-764.
[10] 周德华, 焦方正. 页岩气"甜点" 评价与预测:以四川盆地建南地区侏罗系为例. 石油实验地质, 2012, 34(2):109-114. ZHOU D H, JIAO F Z. Evaluation and prediction of shale gas sweet spots:a case study in Jurassic of Jiannan area, Sichuan Basin. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2012, 34(2):109-114.
[11] 何利, 谭钦银, 宋春彦, 等.四川盆地东部建南地区飞仙关组三段储层裂缝预测与评价.海相油气地质, 2014, 19(4):31-37. HE L, TAN Q Y, SONG C Y, et al. Fracture predication and evaluation of Lower Triassic Feixianguan-3 reservoir in Jiannan area in the east of Sichuan Basin. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2014, 19(4):31-37.
[12] 秦军, 陈玉明, 刘文辉.四川盆地建南地区二叠系长兴组生物礁滩储集层预测.古地理学报, 2011, 13(4):426-433. QIN J, CHEN Y M, LIU W H. Prediction of reef and bank reservoir of the Permian Changxing Formation in Jiannan area, Sichuan Basin. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2011, 13(4):426-433.
[13] 胡忠贵, 胡明毅, 廖军, 等. 鄂西建南地区长兴组沉积相及生物礁沉积演化模式.天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(7):981-989. HU Z G, HU M Y, LIAO J, et al. Sedimentary Facies and evolution model of reef deposition in jiannan area of western Hubei. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2014, 25(7):981-989.
[14] 郭正吾, 邓康龄, 韩永辉, 等.四川盆地形成与演化. 北京:地质出版社, 1996:72-88. GUO Z W, DENG K L, HAN Y H, et al. Formation and evolution of the Sichuan basin. Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 1996:72-88.
[15] 卢双舫, 张敏. 油气地球化学.北京:石油工业出版社, 2008:201-204. LU S F, ZHANG M. Petroleum Geochemistry. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2008:201-204.
[16] 王朋飞, 姜振学, 杨彩虹, 等. 重庆周缘龙马溪组和牛蹄塘组页岩有机质孔隙发育特征. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(3):27-36. WANG P F, JIANG Z X, YANG C H, et al. Organic pore development characteristics of Longmaxi and Niutitang shales in the periphery of Chongqing. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(3):27-36.
[17] 仇秀梅, 刘亚东, 董学林. 鄂西建始地区大隆组页岩有机地球化学特征. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(2):96-104. QIU X M, LIU Y D, DONG X L. Organic geochemical characteristics of shale from Dalong Formation in Jianshi area, western Hubei. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(2):96-104.
[18] 余江浩, 王登, 王亿, 等. 湖北西部上二叠统大隆组页岩气资源潜力评价. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(4):84-90. YU J H, WANG D, WANG Y, et al. Evaluation of shale gas resource potential of Late Permian Dalong Formation in western Hubei province. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(4):84-90.
[19] 程俊, 徐晓飞, 张文峰, 等.上扬子西北缘宁强湾牛蹄塘组有机地球化学特征. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(1):21-26. CHENG J, XU X F, ZHANG W F, et al. Organic geochemical characteristics of Niutitang Formation in Ningqiang Bay, the northwestern margin of Upper Yangtze platform. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(1):21-26.
[20] 曹涛涛, 邓模, 刘虎, 等.可溶有机质对泥页岩储集物性的影响. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(3):43-51. CAO T T, DENG M, LIU H, et al. Influences of soluble organic matter on reservoir properties of shale. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(3):43-51.
[21] 李恒超, 刘大永, 彭平安, 等.人工熟化过程中可溶有机质对页岩孔隙特征的影响. 地球化学, 2017, 46(5):466-475. LI H C, LIU D Y, PENG P A, et al. Effect of extractable organic matter on pore characteristics of shales treated by artificial heating. Geochimica, 2017, 46(5):466-475.
[22] CHALEMERS G R, BUSTIN R M, POWER I M. A pore by any other name would be as small:the importance of meso-and microporosity in shale gas capacity. AAPG Bulletin, 2013, 97(2):170-177.
[23] 邓德文. 天然气毛细封闭盖层评价标准建立天然气地球科学, 1994, 3(5):29-33. DENG D W. Establishment of evaluation criteria for capillary sealed caprock of natural gas. Natural Gas Geoscience, 1994, 3(5):29-33.
[24] 李世臻, 乔德武, 冯志刚, 等.世界页岩气勘探开发现状及对中国的启示. 地质通报, 2010, 29(6):918-924. LI S Z, QIAO D W, FENG Z G, et al. The status of worldwide shale gas exploration and its suggestion for China. Geological Bulletin of China, 2010, 29(6):918-924.
[1] 闫雪莹, 桑琴, 蒋裕强, 方锐, 周亚东, 刘雪, 李顺, 袁永亮. 四川盆地公山庙西地区侏罗系大安寨段致密油储层特征及高产主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 98-109.
[2] 闫建平, 来思俣, 郭伟, 石学文, 廖茂杰, 唐洪明, 胡钦红, 黄毅. 页岩气井地质工程套管变形类型及影响因素研究进展[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 1-14.
[3] 周刚, 杨岱林, 孙奕婷, 严威, 张亚, 文华国, 和源, 刘四兵. 四川盆地及周缘寒武系沧浪铺组沉积充填过程及油气地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 25-34.
[4] 张晓丽, 王小娟, 张航, 陈沁, 关旭, 赵正望, 王昌勇, 谈曜杰. 川东北五宝场地区侏罗系沙溪庙组储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 87-98.
[5] 杨学锋, 赵圣贤, 刘勇, 刘绍军, 夏自强, 徐飞, 范存辉, 李雨桐. 四川盆地宁西地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气富集主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 99-110.
[6] 陈康, 戴隽成, 魏玮, 刘伟方, 闫媛媛, 郗诚, 吕龑, 杨广广. 致密砂岩AVO属性的贝叶斯岩相划分方法——以川中地区侏罗系沙溪庙组沙一段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 111-121.
[7] 包汉勇, 赵帅, 张莉, 刘皓天. 川东红星地区中上二叠统页岩气勘探成果及方向展望[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 12-24.
[8] 申有义, 王凯峰, 唐书恒, 张松航, 郗兆栋, 杨晓东. 沁水盆地榆社—武乡区块二叠系煤系页岩储层地质建模及“甜点”预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 98-108.
[9] 邹连松, 徐文礼, 梁西文, 刘皓天, 周坤, 霍飞, 周林, 文华国. 川东地区下侏罗统自流井组东岳庙段泥页岩沉积特征及物质来源[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 122-135.
[10] 段逸飞, 赵卫卫, 杨天祥, 李富康, 李慧, 王嘉楠, 刘钰晨. 鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区二叠系山西组页岩气源储特征及聚集规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 72-83.
[11] 程静, 闫建平, 宋东江, 廖茂杰, 郭伟, 丁明海, 罗光东, 刘延梅. 川南长宁地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气储层低电阻率响应特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 31-39.
[12] 计玉冰, 郭冰如, 梅珏, 尹志军, 邹辰. 四川盆地南缘昭通示范区罗布向斜志留系龙马溪组页岩储层裂缝建模[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 137-145.
[13] 白雪峰, 李军辉, 张大智, 王有智, 卢双舫, 隋立伟, 王继平, 董忠良. 四川盆地仪陇—平昌地区侏罗系凉高山组页岩油地质特征及富集条件[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 52-64.
[14] 岑永静, 梁锋, 王立恩, 刘倩虞, 张鑫哲, 丁熊. 四川盆地蓬莱—中江地区震旦系灯影组二段成藏特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 89-98.
[15] 张文播, 李亚, 杨田, 彭思桥, 蔡来星, 任启强. 四川盆地简阳地区二叠系火山碎屑岩储层特征与成岩演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 136-146.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 段天向, 刘晓梅, 张亚军, 肖述琴. Petrel 建模中的几点认识[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 102 -107 .
[2] 张立秋. 南二区东部二类油层上返层系组合优化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 116 -120 .
[3] 张娣,侯中健,王亚辉,王莹,王春联. 板桥—北大港地区沙河街组沙一段湖相碳酸盐岩沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(4): 92 -97 .
[4] 樊怀才,李晓平,窦天财,吴欣袁. 应力敏感效应的气井流量动态特征研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(4): 130 -134 .
[5] 田淑芳,张鸿文. 应用生命周期旋回理论预测辽河油田石油探明储量增长趋势[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 98 -100 .
[6] 杨凯,郭肖. 裂缝性低渗透油藏三维两相黑油数值模拟研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(3): 118 -121 .
[7] 翟中喜,秦伟军,郭金瑞. 油气充满度与储层通道渗流能力的定量关系———以泌阳凹陷双河油田岩性油藏为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(4): 92 -95 .
[8] 戚明辉,陆正元,袁帅,李新华. 塔河油田12 区块油藏水体来源及出水特征分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(4): 115 -119 .
[9] 李相博,陈启林,刘化清,完颜容,慕敬魁,廖建波,魏立花. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组3种沉积物重力流及其含油气性[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(3): 16 -21 .
[10] 刘云, 卢渊,伊向艺,张俊良,张锦良,王振喜. 天然气水合物预测模型及其影响因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(3): 124 -127 .