吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组页岩储层孔隙结构定量表征

doi:10.12108/yxyqc.20220409

岩性油气藏 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (4): 89–102.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20220409

吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组页岩储层孔隙结构定量表征

张记刚¹, 杜猛^2,3,4, 陈超¹, 秦明¹, 贾宁洪^3,4, 吕伟峰^3,4, 丁振华¹, 向勇²

1. 中国石油新疆油田分公司勘探开发研究院, 新疆克拉玛依 834000;
2. 中国石油大学(北京)机械与储运工程学院, 北京 102249;
3. 中国石油勘探开发研究院, 北京 100083;
4. 中国石油勘探开发研究院提高采收率国家重点实验室, 北京 100083

收稿日期:2021-12-10 修回日期:2022-03-15 出版日期:2022-07-01 发布日期:2022-07-07
第一作者:张记刚(1982-),男,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事油气田开发方面的研究工作。地址:(834000)新疆克拉玛依准噶尔路29号。Email:sxytzhjq@petrochina.com.cn
通信作者: 向勇(1983-),男,博士,副教授,主要从事多相流腐蚀与防护方面的研究工作。Email:xiangy@cup.edu.cn。
基金资助:
中石油重大开发试验专题研究项目“新疆页岩油注空气提高采收率技术研究”（编号：ks2020-01-06）和中国石油大学（北京）科研基金“复杂环境下油气储运设施腐蚀机理与防护技术研究”（编号：ZX20200128）联合资助

Quantitative characterization of pore structure of shale reservoirs of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag

ZHANG Jigang¹, DU Meng^2,3,4, CHEN Chao¹, QIN Ming¹, JIA Ninghong^3,4, LYU Weifeng^3,4, DING Zhenhua¹, XIANG Yong²

1. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company, Karamay 834000, Xinjiang, China;
2. College of Mechanical and Transportation Engineering, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China;
3. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, Beijing 100083, China;
4. State Key Laboratory of Enhanced Oil Recovery, PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2021-12-10 Revised:2022-03-15 Online:2022-07-01 Published:2022-07-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组是重要的页岩油气聚集区。通过铸体薄片、压汞及核磁共振等分析，结合医用CT、微米CT扫描技术、扫描电镜矿物定量评价（QEMSCAN）及Avizo可视化软件先进的数学算法，构建了吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组页岩储层的三维数字岩心并提取了孔隙网络模型参数，获取全尺度孔径分布曲线，从多个维度综合开展其微观孔隙结构定量表征研究。研究结果表明：①研究区芦草沟组页岩储层的孔隙度平均为7.6%，渗透率平均为0.37 mD，为“低孔-特低渗”型致密页岩储层，其主要储集空间类型为次生溶蚀孔，含残余粒间孔、生物体腔孔和成岩微裂缝。②孔喉尺度为纳米—微米级不等，以0.12~1.75 μm喉道贡献率最高，亚微米—微米级孔喉对渗流的贡献较大，孔隙展布形态多为孤立状和条带状，孔隙半径大多为4.5~12.5 μm；喉道半径大多为1.3~5.1 μm，喉道长度为5~15 μm；孔喉配位数为1~2，孔隙结构具有非均质性强、连通性差等特点，孔喉连通性比孔隙尺度对渗流的贡献更大。③纳米尺度下，基质矿物主要为石英和钠长石，纳米级微孔大多分布于矿物颗粒（晶体）内部有机质孔及胶结物微孔隙，孔径为0.015~5.000 μm。

关键词: 页岩油, 非均质性, 跨尺度, 数字岩心, 微观孔隙结构表征, 芦草沟组, 二叠系, 吉木萨尔凹陷

Abstract: The Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag is an important shale oil and gas accumulation area. Based on the analyses of cast thin sections,mercury injection and nuclear magnetic resonance,combined with medical CT,micro-CT scanning technology,quantitative evaluation of minerals by scanning electron microscope(QEMSCAN)and advanced mathematical algorithms of Avizo visualization software,a three-dimensional digital core of shale reservoirs of Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag was constructed,and the pore network model parameters were extracted,and the full-scale pore size distribution curves were obtained. The comprehensively quantitative characterization of microscopic pore structure from multiple dimensions was carried out. The results show that:(1)The average porosity of the shale reservoirs of Lucaogou Formation in the study area is 7.6%, and the average permeability is 0.37 mD,which belongs to low porosity and ultra-low permeability tight shale reservoir. The main reservoir space is secondary dissolved pores,including residual intergranular pores,biological cavity pores and diagenetic microfractures.(2)The pore throat scale ranges from nanometers to micrometers. The throats within 0.12-1.75 μm have the highest contribution rate,and the submicron-micron pore throats have a greater contribution to seepage. The pores are mainly distributed in isolated and banded shape. The pore radius is mostly 4.5-12.5 μm,the throat radius is mostly 1.3-5.1 μm,and the throat length is 5-15 μm. The pore throat coordination number is mainly 1-2. The pore structure has the characteristics of strong heterogeneity and poor connectivity,and the contribution of pore connectivity to seepage is greater than that of pore scale.(3)On the nano scale,the matrix minerals are mainly quartz and albite,the main nano micropores are organic matter pores in mineral particles(crystals)and cement micropores, and the pore radius is 0.015-5.000 μm.

Key words: shale oil, heterogeneity, cross scale, digital core, microscopic pore structure characterization, Lucaogou Formation, Permian, Jimsar Sag

中图分类号:

TE122

张记刚, 杜猛, 陈超, 秦明, 贾宁洪, 吕伟峰, 丁振华, 向勇. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组页岩储层孔隙结构定量表征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(4): 89–102.

ZHANG Jigang, DU Meng, CHEN Chao, QIN Ming, JIA Ninghong, LYU Weifeng, DING Zhenhua, XIANG Yong. Quantitative characterization of pore structure of shale reservoirs of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(4): 89–102.

参考文献

[1] 张廷山, 彭志, 杨巍, 等. 美国页岩油研究对我国的启示[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(3):1-10. ZHANG Tingshan, PENG Zhi, YANG Wei, et al. Enlightenment of shale oil research in the United States to China[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2015, 27(3):1-10.
[2] 许琳, 常秋生, 杨成克, 等. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组页岩油储层特征及含油性[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(3):535-549. XU Lin, CHANG Qiusheng, YANG Chengke, et al. Shale oil reservoir characteristics and oil bearing property of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimusar Sag[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(3):535-549.
[3] 何登发, 陈新发, 况军, 等. 准噶尔盆地石炭系油气成藏组合特征及勘探前景[J]. 石油学报, 2010, 31(1):1-11. HE Dengfa, CHEN Xinfa, KUANG Jun, et al. Characteristics and exploration prospects of hydrocarbon accumulation in Carboniferous in Junggar Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2010, 31(1):1-11.
[4] 刘一杉, 东晓虎, 闫林, 等. 吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组孔隙结构定量表征[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2019, 40(3):284-289. LIU Yishan, DONG Xiaohu, YAN Lin, et al. Quantitative characterization of pore structure of Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag[J]. Xingjiang Petroleum Geology, 2019, 40(3):284-289.
[5] 李国欣, 覃建华, 鲜成钢, 等. 致密砾岩油田高效开发理论认识、关键技术与实践:以准噶尔盆地玛湖油田为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(6):1-13. LI Guoxin, QIN Jianhua, XIAN Chenggang, et al. Theoretical understandings, key technologies and practices of tight conglomerate oilfield efficient development:A case study of the Mahu Oilfield, Junggar Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(6):1-13.
[6] 吉鸿杰, 邱振, 陶辉飞, 等. 烃源岩特征与生烃动力学研究:以准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 28(4):34-42. JI Hongjie, QIU Zhen, TAO Huifei, et al. Characteristics of source rocks and hydrocarbon generation dynamics:A case study of Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2014, 28(4):34-42.
[7] 冷振鹏, 杨胜建, 吕伟峰, 等. 致密油孔隙结构表征方法:以川中致密油储层岩心为例[J]. 断块油气田, 2016, 23(2):161-165. LENG Zhenpeng, YANG Shengjian, LYU Weifeng, et al. Pore structure characterization for tight oil reservoirs:Taking Chuanzhong tight oil reservoir cores as examples[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2016, 23(2):161-165.
[8] 贾承造, 邹才能, 杨智, 等. 陆相油气地质理论在中国中西部盆地的重大进展[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(4):546-560. JIA Chengzao, ZOU Caineng, YANG Zhi, et al. Significant progress of continental petroleum geology theory in basins of central and western China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(4):546-560.
[9] YANG Liu, ZHANG Xuhui, ZHOU Tong, et al. The effects of ion diffusion on imbibition oil recovery in salt-rich shale oil reservoirs[J]. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 2019, 16(3):525-540.
[10] 林森虎, 邹才能, 袁选俊, 等. 美国致密油开发现状及启示[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(4):25-30. LIN Senhu, ZOU Caineng, YUAN Xuanjun, et al. Current situation and enlightenment of tight oil development in the United States[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2011, 23(4):25-30.
[11] 黄建波, 张奎, 谢斌, 等. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷百口泉组低渗透率砾岩储层分类[J]. 测井技术, 2020, 44(3):305-311. HUANG Jianbo, ZHANG Kui, XIE Bin, et al. Classification and log evaluation to low permeability conglomerate reservior of Baikouquan Formation in Mahu Depression Junggar Basin[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2020, 44(3):305-311.
[12] 刘向君, 熊健, 梁利喜, 等. 基于微CT技术的致密砂岩孔隙结构特征及其对流体流动的影响[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2017, 32(3):1019-1028. LIU Xiangjun, XIONG Jian, LIANG Lixi, et al. Study on the characteristics of pore structure of tight sand based on microCT scanning and its influence on fluid flow[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2017, 32(3):1019-1028.
[13] 贾宁洪, 吕伟峰, 常天全, 等. 高效无损岩心孔隙度精确测量新方法[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(7):824-828. JIA Ninghong, LYU Weifeng, CHANG Tianquan, et al. A new method for precisely measuring core porosity with high efficiency and no destruction[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2018, 39(7):824-828.
[14] BERA B, MITRA S K, VICK D. Understanding the micro structure of Berea Sandstone by the simultaneous use of micro-computed tomography(micro-CT)and focused ion beam-scanning electron microscopy(FIB-SEM)[J]. Micron, 2010, 42(5):412-418.
[15] GOLAB A, WARD C R, PERMANA A, et al. High-resolution three-dimensional imaging of coal using microfocus X-ray computed tomography, with special reference to modes of mineral occurrence[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2013, 113:97-108.
[16] 王朋飞, 姜振学, 李卓, 等. 渝东北下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩微纳米孔隙结构特征[J]. 地球科学, 2017, 42(7):1147-1156. WANG Pengfei, JIANG Zhenxue, LI Zhuo, et al. Micro-nanopore structure characteristics in the Lower Cambrian Niutitang shale, Northest Chongqing[J]. Earth Science, 2017, 42(7):1147-1156.
[17] LYU Weifeng, CHEN Shiyu, GAO Yang, et al. Evaluating seepage radius of tight oil reservoir using digital core modeling approach[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2019, 178:609-615.
[18] 陈怡婷, 刘洛夫, 王梦尧, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部长6、长7储集层特征及其控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(1):51-65. CHEN Yiting, LIU Luofu, WANG Mengyao, et al. Characteristics and controlling factors of Chang 6 and Chang 7 reservoirs in southwestern Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(1):51-65.
[19] 马铨峥, 杨胜来, 杨龙, 等. 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组致密储层微观孔隙特征[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2020, 52(1):36-42. MA Quanzheng, YANG Shenglai, YANG Long, et al. Micro pore characteristics of Lucaogou Formation tight reservoir in Jimusaer Sag,Junggar Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2020, 52(1):36-42.
[20] CURTIS M E, SONDERGELD C H, AMBROSE R J, et al. Microstructural investigation of gas shales in two and three dimensions using nanometer-scale resolution imaging[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2012, 96(4):665-677.
[21] 张文文, 韩长城, 田继军, 等. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组层序地层划分及演化特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(5):45-58. ZHANG Wenwen, HAN Changcheng, TIAN Jijun, et al. Sequence stratigraphy division and evolutionary features of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(5):45-58.
[22] 白斌, 朱如凯, 吴松涛, 等. 利用多尺度CT成像表征致密砂岩微观孔喉结构[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2013, 40(3):329-333. BAI Bin, ZHU Rukai, WU Songtao, et al. Multi-scale method of nano(micro)- CT study on microscopic pore structure of tight sandstone of Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2013, 40(3):329-333.
[23] 王刚, 沈俊男, 储翔宇, 等. 基于CT三维重建的高阶煤孔裂隙结构综合表征和分析[J]. 煤炭学报, 2017, 42(8):2074-2080. WANG Gang, SHEN Junnan, CHU Xiangyu, et al. Characterization and analysis of pores and fissures of high-rank coal based on CT three-dimensional reconstruction[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2017, 42(8):2074-2080.
[24] 刘向君, 朱洪林, 梁利喜. 基于微CT技术的砂岩数字岩石物理实验[J]. 地球物理学报, 2014, 57(4):1133-1140. LIU Xiangjun, ZHU Honglin, LIANG Lixi. Digital rock physics of sandstone based on micro-CT technology[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2014, 57(4):1133-1140.
[25] 郝乐伟, 王琪, 唐俊. 储层岩石微观孔隙结构研究方法与理论综述[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(5):123-128. HAO Lewei, WANG Qi,TANG Jun. Research progress of reservoir microscopic pore structure[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2013, 25(5):123-128.
[26] 李佳琦, 陈蓓蓓, 孔明炜, 等. 页岩油储集层数字岩心重构及微尺度下渗流特征:以吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组页岩油为例[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2019, 40(3):319-327. LI Jiaqi, CHEN Beibei, KONG Mingwei, et al. Digital core reconstruction and research on microscale flow characteristics of shale oilreservoir:A case of the shale oil in Permian Lucaogou Formation, Jimsar Sag[J]. Xingjiang Petroleum Geology, 2019, 40(3):319-327.
[27] PENG Jun, HAN Haodong, XIA Qingsong, et al. Fractal characteristic of microscopic pore structure of tight sandstone reservoirs in Kalpintag Formation in Shuntuoguole area, Tarim Basin[J]. Petroleum Research, 2020, 5(1):1-17.
[28] 杨甫, 贺丹, 马东民, 等. 低阶煤储层微观孔隙结构多尺度联合表征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3):14-23. YANG Fu, HE Dan, MA Dongmin, et al. Multi-scale joint characterization of micro-pore structure of low-rank coal reservoir[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(3):14-23.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组页岩储层孔隙结构定量表征

Quantitative characterization of pore structure of shale reservoirs of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	白玉彬, 李梦瑶, 朱涛, 赵靖舟, 任海姣, 吴伟涛, 吴和源. 玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组烃源岩地球化学特征及页岩油“甜点”评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 110-121.
[2]	王义凤, 田继先, 李剑, 乔桐, 刘成林, 张景坤, 沙威, 沈晓双. 玛湖凹陷西南地区二叠系油气藏相态类型及凝析油气地球化学特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 149-159.
[3]	洪智宾, 吴嘉, 方朋, 余进洋, 伍正宇, 于佳琦. 纳米限域下页岩中可溶有机质的非均质性及页岩油赋存状态[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 160-168.
[4]	魏成林, 张凤奇, 江青春, 鲁雪松, 刘刚, 卫延召, 李树博, 蒋文龙. 准噶尔盆地阜康凹陷东部深层二叠系超压形成机制及演化特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 167-177.
[5]	杨海波, 冯德浩, 杨小艺, 郭文建, 韩杨, 苏加佳, 杨皩, 刘成林. 准噶尔盆地东道海子凹陷二叠系平地泉组烃源岩特征及热演化史模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 156-166.
[6]	王子昕, 柳广弟, 袁光杰, 杨恒林, 付利, 王元, 陈刚, 张恒. 鄂尔多斯盆地庆城地区三叠系长7段烃源岩特征及控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 133-144.
[7]	申有义, 王凯峰, 唐书恒, 张松航, 郗兆栋, 杨晓东. 沁水盆地榆社—武乡区块二叠系煤系页岩储层地质建模及“甜点”预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 98-108.
[8]	唐述凯, 郭天魁, 王海洋, 陈铭. 致密储层缝内暂堵转向压裂裂缝扩展规律数值模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 169-177.
[9]	徐田录, 吴承美, 张金凤, 曹爱琼, 张腾. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组页岩油储层天然裂缝特征与压裂模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 35-43.
[10]	王宏波, 张雷, 曹茜, 张建伍, 潘星. 鄂尔多斯盆地二叠系盒8段河流扇沉积模式及勘探意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 117-126.
[11]	何文渊, 赵莹, 钟建华, 孙宁亮. 松辽盆地古龙凹陷白垩系青山口组页岩油储层中微米孔缝特征及油气意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 1-18.
[12]	程静, 闫建平, 宋东江, 廖茂杰, 郭伟, 丁明海, 罗光东, 刘延梅. 川南长宁地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气储层低电阻率响应特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 31-39.
[13]	邵威, 周道容, 李建青, 章诚诚, 刘桃. 下扬子逆冲推覆构造后缘凹陷油气富集关键要素及有利勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 61-71.
[14]	段逸飞, 赵卫卫, 杨天祥, 李富康, 李慧, 王嘉楠, 刘钰晨. 鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区二叠系山西组页岩气源储特征及聚集规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 72-83.
[15]	曹江骏, 王茜, 王刘伟, 李诚, 石坚, 陈朝兵. 鄂尔多斯盆地合水地区三叠系长7段夹层型页岩油储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 158-171.