岩性油气藏 ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1): 88–97.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20240109

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

准噶尔盆地东道海子凹陷二叠系平地泉组烃源岩特征

李二庭1,2, 米巨磊1,2, 张宇1,2, 潘越扬1,2, 迪丽达尔·肉孜1,2, 王海静1,2, 高秀伟1,2   

  1. 1. 新疆砾岩油藏实验室, 新疆 克拉玛依 834000;
    2. 中国石油新疆油田公司实验检测研究院, 新疆 克拉玛依 834000
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-22 修回日期:2022-09-09 出版日期:2024-01-01 发布日期:2024-01-02
  • 第一作者:李二庭(1988-),男,博士,高级工程师,主要从事油气勘探地质研究工作。地址:(834000)新疆克拉玛依市克拉玛依区准噶尔路32号。Email:lierting@petrochina.com.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    中国石油重大工程技术现场试验项目“准噶尔南缘和玛湖等重点地区优快钻完井技术集成与试验”(编号:2019F-33)资助。

Source rock characteristics of Permian Pingdiquan Formation in Dongdaohaizi sag,Junggar Basin

LI Erting1,2, MI Julei1,2, ZHANG Yu1,2, PAN Yueyang1,2, DILIDAER Rouzi1,2, WANG Haijing1,2, GAO Xiuwei1,2   

  1. 1. Xinjiang Laboratory of Petroleum Reserve in Conglomerate, Karamay 834000, Xinjiang, China;
    2. Research Institute of Experiment and Detection, PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company, Karamay 834000, Xinjiang, China
  • Received:2022-08-22 Revised:2022-09-09 Online:2024-01-01 Published:2024-01-02

摘要: 东道海子凹陷是准噶尔盆地二叠系重要的勘探领域之一,二叠系平地泉组是该区烃源岩发育的重点层系。通过对东道海子凹陷烃源岩分布及有机质地球化学特征分析,明确了平地泉组烃源岩生烃潜力及生成油气的类型。研究结果表明: ①东道海子凹陷平地泉组烃源岩的Pr/nC17值为0.35~1.18,Ph/nC18值为0.23~0.81,显示其生烃母质主要为混合源,既有陆地生物的贡献,也有水体生物的贡献。②纵向上,平一段和平二段烃源岩质量最好,平一段的好—优质烃源岩占比为81.1%,TOC平均值为1.88%,平二段的好—优质烃源岩占比为62.5%,TOC平均值为1.55%,而平三段的好—优质烃源岩仅占30.2%。平一段和平二段烃源岩主要为Ⅱ型,占比分别为66.7%和48.4%,既可生油也可生气,平三段烃源岩质量较差,以Ⅲ型干酪根为主,具有一定的生气潜力;平面上,烃源岩从边缘区向凹陷区逐渐变好。③凹陷边缘区的烃源岩达到成熟演化阶段,凹陷区烃源岩埋深较大,达到高—过成熟演化阶段,该套烃源岩在埋深约为2 500 m时达到生烃门限,在埋深为4 350 m处达到大量排烃门限,而当埋深大于5 050 m时,进入大量裂解生气阶段。④研究区油气分布明显受烃源岩分布及成熟度控制,在远源端剥蚀区浅层侏罗系八道湾组发现成熟油,下凹斜坡区二叠系以轻质油为主,而凹陷中心以平地泉组“自生自储”气藏为主。

关键词: 烃源岩, 生烃潜力, 地球化学特征, 自生自储, 平地泉组, 二叠系, 东道海子凹陷, 准噶尔盆地

Abstract: Dongdaohaizi sag is one of the important exploration fields for Permian in Junggar Basin, and the Permian Pingdiquan Formation is the key formation for the development of source rocks in this area. Based on the analysis of source rock distribution and geochemical characteristics of organic matters, the hydrocarbon generation potential and types of the source rocks of Pingdiquan Formation in Dongdaohaizi sag were determined. The results show that:(1) The Pr/nC17 and Ph/nC18 of Pingdiquan Formation source rocks in Dongdaohaizi sag are 0.35-1.18 and 0.23-0.81, respectively, indicating that the source rocks are mainly sourced from mixed facies, with contributions from both terrestrial and aquatic organisms.(2) Vertically, Ping-1 member and Ping-2 member have the best source rock types. The proportion of good-quality source rocks of Ping-1 member and Ping-2 member is 81.1% and 62.5%, respectively, and the average TOC is 1.88% and 1.55%, respectively. The proportion of good-quality source rocks in Ping-3 member is only 30.2%. The source rocks of Ping-1 member and Ping-2 member are mainly type Ⅱ, accounting for 66.7% and 48.4% respectively, which can generate both oil and gas. The source rocks of Ping-3 member are of poor quality, dominated by type Ⅲ kerogen, and have certain gas potential. On the plane, from marginal area to sag area, the source rocks gradually become better.(3) The source rocks in the marginal area have reached mature evolution stage, and the source rocks in the sag have large burial depth, reaching high and over-mature evolution stage. Source rocks of Pingdiquan Formation reach hydrocarbon generation threshold at about 2 500 m, and massive hydrocarbon expulsion threshold at 4 350 m. When the depth reaches 5 050 m, it is in the stage of massive pyrolysis and gas generation.(4) The distribution of oil and gas in the study area is obviously controlled by the distribution and maturity of source rocks. Therefore, mature oil is mainly found in the shallow Jurassic Badaowan Formation in the far-source denudation area, and light oil is found in Permian in sag slope area. However, the exploration in deep sag should take self-generating and self preserving gas reservoirs of Pingdiquan Formation as target.

Key words: source rock, hydrocarbon generation potential, geochemical characteristics, self-generating and self preserving, Pingdiquan Formation, Permian, Dongdaohaizi sag, Junggar Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.1
[1] 廖健德, 王海静, 罗小平, 等. 准噶尔盆地滴南地区原油地球化学特征及油源[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 43(6):688-695. LIAO Jiande, WANG Haijing, LUO Xiaoping, et al. Geochemical characteristics of crude oil and oil source analysis in the Dinan area of Dongdaohaizi Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition), 2016, 43(6):688-695.
[2] 陈建平, 王绪龙, 邓春萍, 等. 准噶尔盆地油气源、油气分布与油气系统[J]. 地质学报, 2016, 90(3):421-450. CHEN Jianping, WANG Xulong, DENG Chunping, et al. Oil and gas source, occurrence and petroleum system in the Junggar Basin, Northwest China[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2016, 90(3):421-450.
[3] 丁湘华. 准噶尔盆地东道海子凹陷油气成因及成藏期次分析[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2016, 16(10):80-84. DING Xianghua. Analysis of hydrocarbon genesis and accumulation stage of Dongdaohaizi sag in Junggar Basin[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2016, 16(10):80-84.
[4] 张焕旭, 陈世加, 杨迪生, 等. 东道海子凹陷周缘构造油气源对比及勘探潜力分析[J]. 沉积学报, 2017, 35(2):393-404. ZHANG Huanxu, CHEN Shijia, YANG Disheng, et al. Oil-gas source correlation around Dongdaohaizi sag for hydrocarbon exploration potential analysis[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2017, 35(2):393-404.
[5] 白小娜, 罗小平, 刘茂鹏, 等. 东道海子地区储层孔隙烃和包裹体烃对比及油源分析[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 32(3):9-18. BAI Xiaona, LUO Xiaoping, LIU Maopeng, et al. Comparative study of pore hydrocarbon with inclusion hydrocarbon and oilsource relation analysis of reservoir in Dongdaohaizi area[J]. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition), 2017, 32(3):9-18.
[6] 吕正祥, 廖哲渊, 李岳峰, 等. 玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组碱湖云质岩储层成岩作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(5):26-37. LYU Zhengxiang, LIAO Zheyuan, LI Yuefeng, et al. Diagenesis of alkaline lacustrine dolomitic reservoirs of Permian Fengcheng Formation in Mahu Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(5):26-37.
[7] 靳军, 罗小平, 廖健德, 等. 准噶尔盆地东道海子凹陷平地泉组烃源岩地球化学特征[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 42(2):196-202. JIN Jun, LUO Xiaoping, LIAO Jiande, et al. Geochemical characteristics of Permian Pingdiquan Formation hydrocarbon source rocks in Dongdaohaizi sag, Junggar Basin, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition), 2015, 42(2):196-202.
[8] 张义杰, 柳广弟. 准噶尔盆地复合油气系统特征、演化与油气勘探方向[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2002, 29(1):36-39. ZHANG Yijie, LIU Guangdi. Characteristics and evolution of composite petroleum systems and the exploration strategy in Junggar Basin, northwest China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2002, 29(1):36-39.
[9] 陈中红, 柴智. 原油混合后成熟度参数的差异性及其地质意义:以塔北隆起托甫台地区奥陶系为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(5):38-49. CHEN Zhonghong, CHAI Zhi. Difference of maturity parameters of mixed crude oil and its geological significance:A case study of Ordovician in Tuofutai area, Tabei uplift[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(5):38-49.
[10] 李艳平, 邹红亮, 李雷, 等. 准噶尔盆地东道海子凹陷上乌尔禾组油气勘探思路及发现[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(2):127-134. LI Yanping, ZOU Hongliang, LI Lei, et al. Petroleum exploration ideas and discoveries in upper Wuerhe Formation, Dongdaohaizi sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Xijiang Petroleum Geology, 2022, 43(2):127-134.
[11] 王小军, 宋永, 郑孟林, 等. 准噶尔盆地复合含油气系统与复式聚集成藏[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2021, 26(4):29-43. WANG Xiaojun, SONG Yong, ZHENG Menglin, et al. Composite petroleum system and multi-stage hydrocarbon accumulation in Junggar Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2021, 26(4):29-43.
[12] 文钢锋, 田世澄, 李培俊, 等. 东道海子北凹陷侏罗系以下多次波的特征[J]. 新疆石油天然气, 2008, 4(1):11-15. WEN Gangfeng, TIAN Shicheng, LI Peijun, et al. Characteristics of multiwaves of pre-Jurassic strata in the Dongdaohaizi sag of Junggar Basin[J]. Xinjiang Oil & Gas, 2008, 4(1):11-15.
[13] 国家能源局. 烃源岩地球化学评价方法:SY/T 5735-2019[S]. 北京:石油工业出版社, 2020. National Energy Administration. Geochemical method for source rock evaluation:SY/T 5735-2019[J]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2020.
[14] 李二庭, 王剑, 李际, 等. 源储一体烃源岩精确评价:以准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(2):335-342. LI Erting, WANG Jian, LI Ji, et al. Accurate evaluation of source rocks in source-reservoir integration:a case study of source rocks in Lucaogou Formation, Jimsar sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(2):335-342.
[15] 代波, 李二党, 王小军, 等. 基于烃源岩地化参数评价页岩油运聚规律[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2021, 11(4):506-513. DAI Bo, LI Erdang, WANG Xiaojun, et al. Evaluation of shale oil migration and accumulation rules based on geochemical parameters of source rocks[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(4):506-513.
[16] 阳宏, 刘成林, 王飞龙, 等. 渤中凹陷东营组古沉积环境及烃源岩发育模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(6):81-92. YANG Hong, LIU Chenglin, WANG Feilong, et al. Paleoenvironment and development model of source rocks of Dongying Formation in Bozhong Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(6):81-92.
[17] 李二庭, 靳军, 王剑, 等.准噶尔盆地沙湾凹陷周缘中、浅层天然气地球化学特征及成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(1):175-185. LI Erting, JIN Jun, WANG Jian, et al. Geochemical characteristics and genesis of mid-to-shallow natural gas on the periphery of Shawan Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(1):175-185.
[18] 白雨, 汪飞, 牛志杰, 等. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组烃源岩生烃动力学特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(4):116-127. BAI Yu, WANG Fei, NIU Zhijie, et al. Hydrocarbon generation kinetics of source rocks of Permian Fengcheng Formation in Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(4):116-127.
[19] 董丽红, 杜彦军, 李军, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地中部延长组烃源岩生物标志化合物特征[J]. 西安科技大学学报, 2018, 34(4):604-610. DONG Lihong, DU Yanjun, LI Jun, et al. Biomarker characteristics of hydrocarbon source rocks of Yanchang Formation in central Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Xi'an University of Science and Technology, 2018, 34(4):604-610.
[20] 李二庭, 靳军, 陈俊, 等. 生物降解稠油沥青质热解产物中生物标志化合物与单体烃碳同位素组成研究[J]. 地球化学, 2019, 48(3):284-292. LI Erting, JIN Jun, CHEN Jun, et al. Study on biomarkers and carbon isotopic compositions of monomer hydrocarbons in asphaltene pyrolysis products from biodegraded heavy oil[J]. Geichimica, 2019, 48(3):284-292.
[21] 王大伟. 准噶尔盆地东道海子凹陷二叠系平地泉组油气资源潜力评价[D].成都:成都理工大学, 2014. WANG Dawei. Oil and gas resource potential assessment in Permian Pingdiquan Formation of Dongdaohaizi depressinon in Junggar Basin[D]. Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology, 2014.
[22] 张小琴, 李威, 王飞龙, 等. 辽东湾地区古近系烃源岩生物标志物特征及其地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(1):73-85. ZHANG Xiaoqin, LI Wei, WANG Feilong, et al. Biomarker characteristics and geological significance of Paleogene source rocks in Liaodong Bay[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(1):73-85.
[23] 陈建平, 王绪龙, 陈践发, 等. 甲烷碳同位素判识天然气及其源岩成熟度新公式[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2021, 51(4):560-581. CHEN Jianping, WANG Xulong, CHEN Jianfa, et al. New equation to decipher the relationship between carbon isotopic composition of methane and maturity of gas source rocks[J]. Scientia Sinica Terrae, 2021, 51(4):560-581.
[1] 余琪祥, 罗宇, 段铁军, 李勇, 宋在超, 韦庆亮. 准噶尔盆地环东道海子凹陷侏罗系煤层气成藏条件及勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 45-55.
[2] 冉逸轩, 王健, 张熠. 松辽盆地北部中央古隆起基岩气藏形成条件与有利勘探区[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 66-76.
[3] 白玉彬, 李梦瑶, 朱涛, 赵靖舟, 任海姣, 吴伟涛, 吴和源. 玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组烃源岩地球化学特征及页岩油“甜点”评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 110-121.
[4] 屈卫华, 田野, 董常春, 郭小波, 李立立, 林斯雅, 薛松, 杨世和. 松辽盆地德惠断陷白垩系烃源岩特征及其控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 122-134.
[5] 王义凤, 田继先, 李剑, 乔桐, 刘成林, 张景坤, 沙威, 沈晓双. 玛湖凹陷西南地区二叠系油气藏相态类型及凝析油气地球化学特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 149-159.
[6] 乔桐, 刘成林, 杨海波, 王义凤, 李剑, 田继先, 韩杨, 张景坤. 准噶尔盆地盆1井西凹陷侏罗系三工河组凝析气藏特征及成因机制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 169-180.
[7] 李道清, 陈永波, 杨东, 李啸, 苏航, 周俊峰, 仇庭聪, 石小茜. 准噶尔盆地白家海凸起侏罗系西山窑组煤岩气“甜点”储层智能综合预测技术[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 23-35.
[8] 魏成林, 张凤奇, 江青春, 鲁雪松, 刘刚, 卫延召, 李树博, 蒋文龙. 准噶尔盆地阜康凹陷东部深层二叠系超压形成机制及演化特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 167-177.
[9] 杨海波, 冯德浩, 杨小艺, 郭文建, 韩杨, 苏加佳, 杨皩, 刘成林. 准噶尔盆地东道海子凹陷二叠系平地泉组烃源岩特征及热演化史模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 156-166.
[10] 王子昕, 柳广弟, 袁光杰, 杨恒林, 付利, 王元, 陈刚, 张恒. 鄂尔多斯盆地庆城地区三叠系长7段烃源岩特征及控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 133-144.
[11] 杨学锋, 赵圣贤, 刘勇, 刘绍军, 夏自强, 徐飞, 范存辉, 李雨桐. 四川盆地宁西地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气富集主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 99-110.
[12] 程焱, 王波, 张铜耀, 齐玉民, 杨纪磊, 郝鹏, 李阔, 王晓东. 渤中凹陷渤中A-2区新近系明化镇组岩性油气藏油气运移特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 46-55.
[13] 申有义, 王凯峰, 唐书恒, 张松航, 郗兆栋, 杨晓东. 沁水盆地榆社—武乡区块二叠系煤系页岩储层地质建模及“甜点”预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 98-108.
[14] 牟蜚声, 尹相东, 胡琮, 张海峰, 陈世加, 代林锋, 陆奕帆. 鄂尔多斯盆地陕北地区三叠系长7段致密油分布特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 71-84.
[15] 徐田录, 吴承美, 张金凤, 曹爱琼, 张腾. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组页岩油储层天然裂缝特征与压裂模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 35-43.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 黄思静,黄培培,王庆东,刘昊年,吴 萌,邹明亮. 胶结作用在深埋藏砂岩孔隙保存中的意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 7 -13 .
[2] 刘震, 陈艳鹏, 赵阳,, 郝奇, 许晓明, 常迈. 陆相断陷盆地油气藏形成控制因素及分布规律概述[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 121 -127 .
[3] 丁超,郭兰,闫继福. 子长油田安定地区延长组长6 油层成藏条件分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(1): 46 -50 .
[4] 李彦山,张占松,张超谟,陈鹏. 应用压汞资料对长庆地区长6 段储层进行分类研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(2): 91 -93 .
[5] 罗 鹏,李国蓉,施泽进,周大志,汤鸿伟,张德明. 川东南地区茅口组层序地层及沉积相浅析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(2): 74 -78 .
[6] 左国平,屠小龙,夏九峰. 苏北探区火山岩油气藏类型研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(2): 37 -41 .
[7] 王飞宇. 提高热采水平井动用程度的方法与应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(Z1): 100 -103 .
[8] 袁云峰,才业,樊佐春,姜懿洋,秦启荣,蒋庆平. 准噶尔盆地红车断裂带石炭系火山岩储层裂缝特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(1): 47 -51 .
[9] 袁剑英,付锁堂,曹正林,阎存凤,张水昌,马达德. 柴达木盆地高原复合油气系统多源生烃和复式成藏[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(3): 7 -14 .
[10] 石战战,贺振华,文晓涛,唐湘蓉. 一种基于EMD 和GHT 的储层识别方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(3): 102 -105 .