岩性油气藏 ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (4): 124–130.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2017.04.015

• 技术方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同脆性岩石的声发射特征

赵万春1, 马云朋1, 王婷婷2, 程东3, 陈艳秋1, 冯笑含1   

  1. 1. 东北石油大学 石油工程学院, 黑龙江 大庆 163318;
    2. 东北石油大学 电气信息工程学院, 黑龙江 大庆 163318;
    3. 渤海钻探工程有限公司工程技术处, 天津 300457
  • 收稿日期:2017-02-13 修回日期:2017-04-06 出版日期:2017-07-21 发布日期:2017-07-21
  • 作者简介:赵万春(1978-),男,博士,教授，博士生导师,主要从事油气井工程力学方面的教学与研究工作。地址:(163318)黑龙江省大庆市高新技术开发区学府街99号东北石油大学石油工程学院。Email:zhaowanchun520@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目“页岩气藏压裂岩体突变特征及多重分形缝网逾渗演化研究”（编号：51404073）、国家自然科学基金项目“页岩局部脆性表征与压裂裂缝交互耦合演化机制研究”（编号：51574088）、中国博士后科学基金项目“页岩气藏压裂介观逾渗系统演化与气体流动机理研究”（编号：2014M550180）、中国博士后科学基金特别资助项目“页岩压裂岩体局部脆性破裂与缝网演化多重分形特征研究”（编号：2016T90268）和黑龙江省博士后青年英才计划特别资助项目“煤岩脆塑性表征与岩体压裂突变破裂演化机理研究”（编号：LBH-TZ-0503）联合资助

Acoustic emission characteristics of rocks with different brittleness

ZHAO Wanchun1, MA Yunpeng1, WANG Tingting2, CHENG Dong3, CHEN Yanqiu1, FENG Xiaohan1   

  1. 1. School of Petroleum Engineering, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing 163318, Heilongjiang, China;
    2. School of Electrical Engineering & Information, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing 163318, Heilongjiang, China;
    3. Department of Engineering Technology, Bohai Drilling Engineering Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300457, China
  • Received:2017-02-13 Revised:2017-04-06 Online:2017-07-21 Published:2017-07-21

PDF (PC)

298

摘要： 目前针对岩石声发射的试验主要集中在研究岩石的力学特性方面，关于岩石脆性的声发射试验相对较少。为了研究岩石脆性的声发射特征，对4种不同脆性的岩石试样进行了单轴压缩和声发射检测试验，所用试样为含砂比不同的自制水泥砂石，试验得到了试样的应力-应变曲线和声发射计数曲线。结果表明：试样中的含砂比与岩石脆性正相关；脆性越强，应力-应变曲线的弹性变形段斜率越大，峰后应力跌落越快，形变量越大，出现明显声发射信号的时间越早，声发射计数的最大值越大；峰前声发射计数曲线显示，随着岩石脆性的增加，试样破裂方式由渐进式破裂向突发式破裂过渡，裂缝形态由张性裂缝向剪性裂缝及混合裂缝转变。整体而言，岩石脆性不同，声发射特征也不同，根据声发射特征可以判断岩石脆性的强弱。该试验结果对于评价岩石脆性及水力压裂选层方案设计等具有理论参考价值和现实意义。

关键词: 储层特征, 成岩作用, 致密油, 阿尔善组, 额仁淖尔凹陷, 二连盆地

Abstract: Current researches on acoustic emission test of rock are mostly focused on the mechanical properties of rock,and the acoustic emission test of rock brittleness is relatively a few. The uniaxial test and acoustic emission tests were carried out on four kinds of rock samples with different brittleness which are cement mortar rocks with different sand ratio,so as to obtain the stress-strain curves and the acoustic emission count curves. The result shows that the sand ratio of samples is positively related with rock brittleness. The greater the rock brittleness is,the greater the slope of the elastic deformation section is,the faster the stress drops and the larger the strain is after the peak on the stress-strain curves. On the acoustic emission count curves,the more brittle the rock sample is,the earlier the time that acoustic emission signal appears and the greater the maximum value of the acoustic emission count is. The acoustic emission count curves before the peak show that with the increase of rock brittleness,the fracture mode of samples transits from progressive fracture to burst fracture,and the fracture morphology of samples is changed from tensile crack to shear crack and mixed cracks. Overall,rocks with different brittleness have different acoustic emission characteristics,so acoustic emission characteristics can be used to judge the rock brittleness. This test result has theoretical reference value and practical significance for the evaluation of rock brittleness and hydraulic fracturing scheme design.

Key words: reservoir characteristics, diagenesis, tight oil, A'ershan Formation,Erennao'er Sag, Erlian Basin

中图分类号: 

  • P584
[1] 祝彦贺, 胡前泽, 陈桂华, 等.北美A-29区块页岩油资源潜力分析.岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(3):66-70. ZHU Y H, HU Q Z, CHEN G H, et al. Study on resource potential of shale oil in A-29 b1ock, North America. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2013, 25(3):66-70.
[2] 林森虎, 邹才能, 袁选俊, 等.美国致密油开发现状及启示.岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(4):25-30. LIN S H, ZOU C N, YUAN X J, et al. Status quo of tight oil exploration in the United States and its implication. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2011, 23(4):25-30.
[3] MAYERHOFER M J, LOLON E P, WARPINSKI N R, et al. What is stimulated reservoir volume? SPE 119890, 2010.
[4] 张小龙, 张同伟, 李艳芳, 等.页岩气勘探和开发进展综述.岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(2):116-122. ZHANG X L, ZHANG T W, LI Y F, et al. Research advance in exploration and development of shale gas. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2013, 25(2):116-122.
[5] 蒋裕强, 董大忠, 漆麟, 等.页岩气储层的基本特征及其评价. 天然气工业, 2010, 30(10):7-12. JIANG Y Q, DONG D Z, QI L, et al. Basic features and evaluation of shale gas reservoirs. Natural Gas Industry, 2010, 30(10):7-12.
[6] 胡永全, 贾锁刚, 赵金洲, 等.缝网压裂控制条件研究.西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 35(4):126-132. HU Y Q, JIA S G, ZHAO J Z, et al. Study on controlling conditional in network hydraulic fracturing. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2013, 35(4):126-132.
[7] RICKAMN R, MULLEN M, PETRE E, et al. A practical use of shale petrophysics for stimulation design optimization:all shale plays are not clones of the Barnett Shale. SPE 115258, 2008.
[8] 李庆辉, 陈勉, 金衍, 等.页岩脆性的室内评价方法及改进.岩石力学与工程学报, 2012, 31(8):1680-1685. LI Q H, CHEN M, JIN Y, et al. Indoor evaluation method for shale brittleness and improvement. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 31(8):1680-1685.
[9] 王宇, 李晓, 武艳芳, 等.脆性岩石起裂应力水平与脆性指标关系探讨.岩石力学与工程学报, 2014, 33(2):264-275. WANG Y, LI X, WU Y F, et al. Research on relationship between crack initiation stress level and brittleness indices for brittle rock. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 33(2):264-275.
[10] 幐山邦久.声发射(AE)技术的应用.冯夏庭译.北京:冶金工业出版社, 1996:3-7. KATSUYAMA K. Application of AE techniques. FENG X T, trans. Beijing:China Metallurgical Industry Press, 1996:3-7.
[11] 秦四清, 李造鼎.岩石声发射的损伤模式及其在地震研究中的初步应用.中国地震, 1993, 9(1):54-59. QIN S Q, LI Z D. A damage model of Acoustic Emission in rock and its initial applications in seismological research. Earthquake Research in China, 1993, 9(1):54-59.
[12] 梁正召, 唐春安, 朱万成, 等.岩石非均匀性对震级——频度关系的影响的数值模拟.地震研究, 2003, 26(2):151-155. LIANG Z Z, TANG C A, ZHU W C, et al. Numerical stimuation of influence of rock heterogeneity on the relation between magnitude and frequency. Journal of Seismological Research, 2003, 26(2):151-155.
[13] 张明, 李仲奎, 杨强, 等.准脆性材料声发射的损伤模型及统计分析.岩石力学与工程学报, 2006, 25(12):2493-2501. ZHANG M, LI Z K, YANG Q, et al. A damage model and statistical analysis of acoustic emission for quasi-brittle materials. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2006, 25(12):2493-2501.
[14] GANNE P,VERVOORT A,WEVESS M. Quantification of pre-peak brittle damage:correlation between acoustic emission and observed micro-fracturing. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2007, 44(5):720-729.
[15] NICKSIAR M, MARTIN C D. Evaluation of methods for determining crack initiation in compression tests on low-porosity rocks. Rock Mechanic and Rock Engineering, 2012, 45(4):607-617.
[16] 赵兴东, 陈长华, 刘建坡, 等.不同岩石声发射活动特性的实验研究. 东北大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 29(11):1633-1636. ZHAO X D, CHEN C H, LIU J P, et al. Experimental study on AE activity characteristics of different rock samples. Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science), 2008, 29(11):1633-1636.
[17] 万志军, 李学华, 刘长友. 加载速率对岩石声发射活动的影响.辽宁工程技术大学学报(自然科学版), 2001, 20(4):469-471. WAN Z J, LI X H, LIU C Y. Influence of loading velocity on the rock's acoustic emission activity. Journal of Liaoning Technical University (Natural Science), 2001, 20(4):469-471.
[18] 张茹, 谢和平, 刘建锋, 等.单轴多级加载岩石破坏声发射特性试验研究. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2006, 25(12):2584-2588. ZHANG R, XIE H P, LIU J F, et al. Experimental study on acoustic emission characteristics of rock failure under uniaxial multilevel loadings. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2006, 25(12):2584-2588.
[19] 蒋海昆, 张流, 周永胜.不同围压条件下花岗岩变形破坏过程中的声发射时序特征.地球物理学报, 2000, 43(6):812-826. JIANG H K, ZHANG L, ZHOU Y S. Behavior of acoustic emission time sequence of granite in deformation and failure process under different confining pressures. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2000, 43(6):812-826.
[20] 文圣勇, 韩立军, 宗义江, 等.不同含水率红砂岩单轴压缩试验声发射特征研究.煤炭科学技术, 2013, 41(8):46-52. WEN S Y, HAN L J, ZONG Y J, et al. Study on acoustic emission characteristics of sandstone uniaxial compression test with different moisture content. Coal Science and Technology, 2013, 41(8):46-52.
[21] 秦虎, 黄滚, 王伟忠.不同含水率煤岩受压变形破坏全过程声发射特征试验研究.岩石力学与工程学报, 2012, 31(6):1115-1120. QIN H, HUANG G, WANG W Z. Experimental study of acoustic emission characteristics of coal samples with different moisture contents in process of compression deformation and failure. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 31(6):1115-1120.
[22] JARVIE D M, HILL R J, RUBLE T E, et al. Unconventional shale-gas systems:the Mississippian Barnett Shale of north-central Texas as one model for thermogenic shale-gas assessment. AAPG Bulletin, 2007, 91(4):475-499.
[23] 李拒源. 东营凹陷泥页岩矿物组成及脆度分析. 沉积学报, 2013, 31(4):616-620. LI J Y. Analysis on mineral components and frangibility of shales in Dongying Depression. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2013, 31(4):616-620.
[24] 陈吉, 肖贤明.南方古生界3套富有机质页岩矿物组成与脆性分析.煤炭学报, 2013, 38(5):822-826. CHEN J, XIAO X M. Mineral composition and brittleness of three sets of Paleozoic organic-rich shales in China South area. Journal of China Coal Society, 2013, 38(5):822-826.
[25] 周辉, 孟凡震, 张传庆, 等.基于应力-应变曲线的岩石脆性特征定量评价方法. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2014, 33(6):1114-1122. ZHOU H, MENG F Z, ZHANG C Q, et al. Quantitative evaluation of rock brittleness based on stress-strain curve. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 33(6):1114-1122.
[26] 赵毅鑫, 姜耀东, 祝捷, 等.煤岩组合体变形破坏前兆信息的试验研究.岩石力学与工程学报, 2008, 27(2):339-346. ZHAO Y X, JIANG Y D, ZHU J, et al. Experimental study on precursory information of deformations of coal-rock composite samples before failure. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2008, 27(2):339-346.
[27] 王煜曦, 王金安, 唐君. 断裂岩石在蠕剪过程中的声发射特征.岩石力学与工程学报, 2015,34(增刊1):2948-2958. WANG Y X, WANG J A, TANG J. Acoustic emission characteristics of fractured rocks during creep shear. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2015, 34(Suppl 1):2948-2958.
[28] 陶纪南, 张克利, 郑晋峰.岩石破坏过程声发射特征参数的研究.岩石力学与工程学报, 1996, 15(增刊1):452-455. TAO J N, ZHANG K L, ZHENG J F. Research of parameter of acoustic emission under rock failure. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 1996, 15(Suppl 1):452-455.
[29] 袁振明, 耿荣生.声发射检测.北京:机械工业出版社, 2005:1-4. YUAN Z M, GENG R S. Acoustic emission detection. Beijing:China Machine Press, 2005:1-4.
[30] 杨永杰, 王德超, 郭明福, 等.基于三轴压缩声发射试验的岩石损伤特征研究.岩石力学与工程学报, 2014, 33(1):98-104. YANG Y J, WANG D C, GUO M F, et al. Study of rock damage characteristics based on acoustic emission tests under triaxial compression. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 33(1):98-104.
[1] 柴毓, 王贵文, 柴新. 四川盆地金秋区块三叠系须二段储层非均质性及成因[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 29-40.
[2] 尹兴平, 蒋裕强, 付永红, 张雪梅, 雷治安, 陈超, 张海杰. 渝西地区五峰组—龙马溪组龙一1亚段页岩岩相及储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 41-51.
[3] 郑荣臣, 李宏涛, 史云清, 肖开华. 川东北元坝地区三叠系须三段沉积特征及成岩作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 13-26.
[4] 姚海鹏, 于东方, 李玲, 林海涛. 内蒙古地区典型煤储层吸附特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 1-8.
[5] 李慧莉, 尤东华, 李建交, 谭广辉, 刘士林. 麦盖提斜坡北新1井吐依洛克组角砾岩储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 26-35.
[6] 严敏, 赵靖舟, 曹青, 吴和源, 黄延昭. 鄂尔多斯盆地临兴地区二叠系石盒子组储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 49-58.
[7] 李祖兵, 崔俊峰, 宋舜尧, 成亚斌, 卢异, 陈岑. 黄骅坳陷北大港潜山中生界碎屑岩储层特征及成因机理[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 81-92.
[8] 张治恒, 田继军, 韩长城, 张文文, 邓守伟, 孙国祥. 吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 116-126.
[9] 王付勇, 杨坤. 致密油藏孔喉分布特征对渗吸驱油规律的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 155-162.
[10] 曹思佳, 孙增玖, 党虎强, 曹帅, 刘冬民, 胡少华. 致密油薄砂体储层预测技术及应用实效——以松辽盆地敖南区块下白垩统泉头组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 239-247.
[11] 宁从前, 周明顺, 成捷, 苏芮, 郝鹏, 王敏, 潘景丽. 二维核磁共振测井在砂砾岩储层流体识别中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 267-274.
[12] 袁纯, 张惠良, 王波. 大型辫状河三角洲砂体构型与储层特征——以库车坳陷北部阿合组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 73-84.
[13] 冯越, 黄志龙, 李天军, 张华, 李宏伟, 周亚东. 吐哈盆地胜北洼陷七克台组二段致密油成藏条件[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 97-108.
[14] 王朋, 孙灵辉, 王核, 李自安. 鄂尔多斯盆地吴起地区延长组长6储层特征及其控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5): 63-72.
[15] 黄杰, 杜玉洪, 王红梅, 郭佳, 单晓琨, 苗雪, 钟新宇, 朱玉双. 特低渗储层微观孔隙结构与可动流体赋存特征——以二连盆地阿尔凹陷腾一下段储层为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5): 93-101.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 庞雄奇, 陈冬霞, 张　俊. 隐蔽油气藏的概念与分类及其在实际应用中需要注意的问题[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 1 -8 .
[2] 雷卞军，张吉，王彩丽，王晓蓉，李世临，刘斌. 高分辨率层序地层对微相和储层的控制作者用——以靖边气田统5井区马五段上部为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 1 -7 .
[3] 杨杰，卫平生，李相博. 石油地震地质学的基本概念、内容和研究方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 1 -6 .
[4] 王延奇，胡明毅，刘富艳，王辉，胡治华. 鄂西利川见天坝长兴组海绵礁岩石类型及礁体演化阶段[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(3): 44 -48 .
[5] 代黎明, 李建平, 周心怀, 崔忠国, 程建春. 渤海海域新近系浅水三角洲沉积体系分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 75 -81 .
[6] 段友祥, 曹婧, 孙歧峰. 自适应倾角导向技术在断层识别中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(4): 101 -107 .
[7] 黄龙，田景春，肖玲，王峰. 鄂尔多斯盆地富县地区长6砂岩储层特征及评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 83 -88 .
[8] 杨仕维，李建明. 震积岩特征综述及地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 89 -94 .
[9] 李传亮，涂兴万. 储层岩石的2种应力敏感机制——应力敏感有利于驱油[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 111 -113 .
[10] 李君, 黄志龙, 李佳, 柳波. 松辽盆地东南隆起区长期隆升背景下的油气成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 57 -61 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发