湖北西部上二叠统大隆组页岩气资源潜力评价

doi:10.12108/yxyqc.20180409

岩性油气藏 ›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4): 84–90.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20180409

湖北西部上二叠统大隆组页岩气资源潜力评价

余江浩, 王登, 王亿, 谢通, 石先滨, 陈威

湖北省地质调查院, 武汉 430034

收稿日期:2017-09-27 修回日期:2017-11-07 出版日期:2018-07-21 发布日期:2018-07-21
作者简介:余江浩(1985-),男,硕士,工程师,主要从事页岩气勘探方面的研究工作。地址:(430034)湖北省武汉市硚口区古田五路9号。Email:jhyu2005@126.com。
基金资助:
湖北省国土资源厅2014年地勘基金项目“湖北省页岩气资源潜力评价（编号：鄂页调2014-4）”资助

Evaluation of shale gas resource potential of Late Permian Dalong Formation in western Hubei province

YU Jianghao, WANG Deng, WANG Yi, XIE Tong, SHI Xianbin, CHEN Wei

Hubei Geological Survey, Wuhan 430034, China

Received:2017-09-27 Revised:2017-11-07 Online:2018-07-21 Published:2018-07-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 湖北宜昌秭归地区寒武系及前寒武系页岩气的勘探突破，显示出湖北西部地区良好的页岩气勘探前景。湖北西部地区是目前湖北省页岩气勘探开发的重点区域，也是最有可能实现页岩气商业性突破的地区。通过野外剖面测量与对比、老井复查、泥页岩样品的地球化学和含气性分析认为：湖北西部建始—鹤峰地区上二叠统大隆组主要发育台盆沉积环境，沉积的黑色页岩有效厚度达30 m左右，且成烃物质基础良好；大隆组页岩气钻井现场解析气质量体积均超过2 m³/t，泥页岩样品等温吸附实验模拟测定的页岩气质量体积均值达2.58 m³/t，显示出良好的页岩气勘探前景。湖北西部二叠系大隆组是湖北省最有可能成为继秭归地区寒武系及前寒武系页岩气勘探示范区之后又一页岩气勘探示范区，有望揭开湖北省页岩气勘探开发的新局面。

关键词: 储层特征, 致密砂岩, 成岩作用, 太原组, 鄂尔多斯盆地

Abstract: The exploration breakthrough of Cambrian and Precambrian shale gas in Zigui area,Yichang,Hubei province,shows favorable exploration prospects for shale gas in western Hubei province. The western region of Hubei province is the key area for shale gas exploration and development and is also the most likely area to achieve a commercial breakthrough of shale gas. Field profile survey and correlation,old well reexamination, geochemical and gas-bearing property analysis of shale samples were carried out. It is considered that it was mainly basin sedimentary environment in the Late Permian Dalong Formation in Jianshi-Hefeng area. The effective thickness of the deposited black shale is about 30 m,and the hydrocarbon generation material basis is fine. The shale gasmass volume of Dalong Formation is more than 2 m³/t,and the average shale gas mass volume of the shale samples measured by isothermal adsorption experiment reaches 2.58 m³/t. showing favorable prospects of shale gas exploration. The Permian Dalong Formation in western Hubei is most likely to be a new demonstration area for shale gas exploration in Hubei province since the demonstration area of Cambrian and Precambrian in Zigui region, which is expected to open up a new situation of shale gas exploration and development in Hubei province.

Key words: reservoir characteristics, tight sandstone, diagenesis, Taiyuan Formation, Ordos Basin

中图分类号:

P618.13

余江浩, 王登, 王亿, 谢通, 石先滨, 陈威. 湖北西部上二叠统大隆组页岩气资源潜力评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(4): 84–90.

YU Jianghao, WANG Deng, WANG Yi, XIE Tong, SHI Xianbin, CHEN Wei. Evaluation of shale gas resource potential of Late Permian Dalong Formation in western Hubei province[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(4): 84–90.

参考文献

[1] 颜丹平, 汪新文, 刘友元.川鄂湘边区褶皱构造样式及其成因机制分析.现代地质, 2000, 14(1):37-43. YAN D P, WANG X W, LIU Y Y. Analysis of fold style and its formation mechanism in the area of boundary among Sichuan, Hubei and Hunan. Geoscience, 2000, 14(1):37-43.
[2] 颜丹平, 金哲龙, 张维宸, 等.川渝湘鄂薄皮构造带多层拆离滑脱系的岩石力学性质及其对构造变形样式的控制.地质通报, 2008, 27(10):1687-1697. YAN D P, JIN Z L, ZHANG W C, et al. Rock mechanical characteristics of the multi-layer detachment fault system and their controls on the structural deformation style of the SichuanChongqing-Hunan-Hubei thin-skinned belt, South China. Geological Bulletin of China, 2008, 27(10):1687-1697.
[3] 赵宗举, 朱琰, 李大成, 等.中国南方构造形变对油气藏的控制作用.石油与天然气地质, 2002, 23(1):19-25. ZHAO Z J, ZHU Y,LI D C, et al. Control affect of tectonic deformation to oil-gas pools in southern China. Oil & Gas Geology, 2002, 23(1):19-25.
[4] 梅廉夫, 刘昭茜, 汤济广, 等.湘鄂西-川东中生代陆内递进扩展变形:来自裂变径迹和平衡剖面的证据.地球科学(中国地质大学学报), 2010, 35(2):161-174. MEI L F, LIU Z Q, TANG J G, et al. Mesozoic intra-continental progressive deformation in western Hunan-Hubei-eastern Sichuan provinces of china:Evidence from apatite fission track and balanced cross-section. Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences, 2010, 35(2):161-174.
[5] 梁狄刚, 郭彤楼, 边立曾, 等.中国南方海相生烃成藏研究的若干新进展(三):南方四套区域性海相烃源岩的沉积相及发育的控制因素.海相油气地质, 2009, 14(2):1-19. LIANG D G, GUO T L, BIAN L Z, et al. Some progresses on studies of hydrocarbon generation and accumulation in marine sedimentary regions,southern china(Part 3):Controlling factors on the sedimentary facies and development of Paleozoic marine source rocks. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2009, 14(2):1-19.
[6] 黄福喜. 中上扬子克拉通盆地沉积层序充填过程与演化模式.成都:成都理工大学, 2011. HUANG F X. Filling process and evolutionary model of sedimentary sequence in middle-upper Yangtze cratonic basin. Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology, 2011.
[7] 张鹏飞.中扬子地区古生代构造古地理格局及其演化.北京:中国石油大学, 2009. ZHANG P F. Tectonic palaeogeographic pattern and its evolution of Paleozoic in middle Yangtze region. Beijing:China University of Petroleum, 2009.
[8] 马力, 陈焕疆, 甘克文, 等.中国南方大地构造和海相油气地质.北京:地质出版社, 2004. MA L, CHEN H J, GAN K W, et al. Geotectonics and marine petroleum geology in the South China. Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 2004.
[9] 龙幼康.中扬子地区下古生界页岩气的勘探潜力.地质通报, 2011, 30(2/3):344-348. LONG Y K. Lower Paleozoic shale gas exploration potential in the central Yangtze area, China. Geological Bulletin of China, 2011, 30(2/3):344-348.
[10] 邱小松, 胡明毅, 胡忠贵, 等.页岩气资源评价方法及评价参数赋值——以中扬子地区五峰组-龙马溪组为例. 中国地质, 2014, 41(6):2091-2098. QIU X S, HU M Y, HU Z G, et al. Evaluation methods and parameter assignments of shale gas resources:a case study of the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in the Middle Yangtze region. Geology in China, 2014, 41(6):2091-2098.
[11] 朱华, 姜文利, 边瑞康, 等.页岩气资源评价方法体系及其应用——以川西坳陷为例.天然气工业, 2009, 29(12):130-134. ZHU H, JIANG W L, BIAN R K, et al. Shale gas assessment methodology and its application:a case study of the western Sichuan Depression. Natural Gas Industry, 2009, 29(12):130-134.
[12] 张士万, 杨振武, 梁西文, 等.中扬子区海相天然气勘探层系及突破方向.石油实验地质, 2007, 29(4):361-366. ZHANG S W, YANG Z W, LIANG X W, et al. Exploration strata and breakthrough orientation of marine facies natural gas in the middle Yangtze region. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2007, 29(4):361-366.
[13] 聂海宽, 唐玄, 边瑞康.页岩气成藏控制因素及中国南方页岩气发育有利区预测.石油学报, 2009, 30(4):484-491. NIE H K, TANG X, BIAN R K. Controlling factors for shale gas accumulation and prediction of potentialdevelopment area in shale gas reservoir of South China. Journal of Petroleum Science, 2009, 30(4):484-491.
[14] 邹才能, 董大忠, 王社教, 等.中国页岩气形成机理,地质特征及资源潜力. 石油勘探与开发, 2010, 37(6):641-653. ZOU C N, DONG D Z, WANG S J, et al. Geological characteristics, formation mechanism and resource potential of shale gas in China. Petroleum Exploration & Development, 2010, 37(6):641-653.
[15] 闫剑飞, 余谦, 刘伟, 等.中上扬子地区下古生界页岩气资源前景分析.沉积与特提斯地质, 2010, 30(3):96-103. YAN J F, YU Q, LIU W, et al. Perspectives of the Lower Paleozoic shale gas resources in the Middle-Upper Yangtze area. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 2010, 30(3):96-103.
[16] 马永生.中国海相油气勘探.北京:地质出版社, 2007. MA Y S. Marine oil and gas exploration of China. Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 2007.
[17] 胡明毅, 代卿林, 朱忠德.中扬子地区海相碳酸盐岩石油地质特征及远景评价.石油与天然气地质, 1993, 14(4):331-339. HU M Y, DAI Q L, ZHU Z D. Geological characteristics and assessment of marine carbonate rocks in the middle Yangtze region. Oil and Gas Geology, 1993, 14(4):331-339.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

湖北西部上二叠统大隆组页岩气资源潜力评价

Evaluation of shale gas resource potential of Late Permian Dalong Formation in western Hubei province

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	张文凯, 施泽进, 田亚铭, 王勇, 胡修权, 李文杰. 川东南志留系小河坝组致密砂岩孔隙类型及成因[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 10-19.
[2]	柴毓, 王贵文, 柴新. 四川盆地金秋区块三叠系须二段储层非均质性及成因[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 29-40.
[3]	尹兴平, 蒋裕强, 付永红, 张雪梅, 雷治安, 陈超, 张海杰. 渝西地区五峰组—龙马溪组龙一₁亚段页岩岩相及储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 41-51.
[4]	徐宁宁, 王永诗, 张守鹏, 邱隆伟, 张向津, 林茹. 鄂尔多斯盆地大牛地气田二叠系盒1段储层特征及成岩圈闭[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 52-62.
[5]	李志远, 杨仁超, 张吉, 王一, 杨特波, 董亮. 天然气扩散散失率定量评价——以苏里格气田苏X区块为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 76-84.
[6]	郑荣臣, 李宏涛, 史云清, 肖开华. 川东北元坝地区三叠系须三段沉积特征及成岩作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 13-26.
[7]	刘桓, 苏勤, 曾华会, 孟会杰, 张小美, 雍运动. 近地表Q补偿技术在川中地区致密气勘探中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 104-112.
[8]	许飞. 考虑化学渗透压作用下页岩气储层压裂液的自发渗吸特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 145-152.
[9]	郭永伟, 闫方平, 王晶, 褚会丽, 杨建雷, 陈颖超, 张笑洋. 致密砂岩油藏CO₂驱固相沉积规律及其储层伤害特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 153-161.
[10]	姚海鹏, 于东方, 李玲, 林海涛. 内蒙古地区典型煤储层吸附特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 1-8.
[11]	魏钦廉, 崔改霞, 刘美荣, 吕玉娟, 郭文杰. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部二叠系盒8下段储层特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 17-25.
[12]	李慧莉, 尤东华, 李建交, 谭广辉, 刘士林. 麦盖提斜坡北新1井吐依洛克组角砾岩储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 26-35.
[13]	张晓辉, 张娟, 袁京素, 崔小丽, 毛振华. 鄂尔多斯盆地南梁-华池地区长8₁致密储层微观孔喉结构及其对渗流的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 36-48.
[14]	严敏, 赵靖舟, 曹青, 吴和源, 黄延昭. 鄂尔多斯盆地临兴地区二叠系石盒子组储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 49-58.
[15]	龙盛芳, 王玉善, 李国良, 段传丽, 邵映明, 何咏梅, 陈凌云, 焦煦. 苏里格气田苏49区块盒8下亚段致密储层非均质性特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 59-69.