岩性油气藏 ›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5): 59–67.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20180507

• 技术方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于EEMD的高分辨率层序地层划分方法

杨应1,2, 杨巍1,2,3, 朱仕军1,2   

  1. 1. 油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室·西南石油大学, 成都 610500;
    2. 西南石油大学 地球科学与技术学院, 成都 610500;
    3. 电子科技大学 资源与环境学院, 成都 610054
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-04 修回日期:2018-02-12 出版日期:2018-09-14 发布日期:2018-09-14
  • 第一作者:杨应(1992-),男,西南石油大学在读硕士研究生,研究方向为储层预测及地震信号分析。地址:(610500)四川省成都市新都区新都大道8号西南石油大学地球科学与技术学院。Email:1156487395@qq.com
  • 通信作者: 杨巍(1983-),男,博士,硕士研究生导师,主要从事储层预测与地震信号分析方面的教学和科研工作。Email:87390538@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重大科技专项“塔里木盆地碳酸盐岩油气田提高采收率关键技术示范工程”子课题“缝洞型油藏流体识别研究”（编号：2016ZX05053-001-01-03）资助

Method for high-resolution sequence stratigraphy division based on Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition

YANG Ying1,2, YANG Wei1,2,3, ZHU Shijun1,2   

  1. 1. State key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China;
    2. School of Geoscience and Technology, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China;
    3. School of Resources and Environment, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610054, China
  • Received:2017-12-04 Revised:2018-02-12 Online:2018-09-14 Published:2018-09-14

PDF (PC)

481

摘要： 划分不同级次的层序界面以及识别其内部的沉积旋回类型是层序地层分析的重要基础。测井信号是不同周期的地层旋回信息的叠合，通过时频分析方法可将测井数据内隐藏的地层旋回性信息拓展到不同的频带内，进而进行不同级次层序界面的划分以及旋回类型的判别。利用总体经验模态分解（Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition，EEMD）方法对测井数据进行分解，得到不同频带的本征模态分量，结合Hilbert变换获取各分量的频率特征。最后根据各分量的周期性波动和频率变化特征与不同沉积旋回类型以及各级层序界面之间的对应关系划分地层层序。在东营凹陷沙三段的应用中表明，该方法适用于短期、中期、长期基准面旋回的划分，为高分辨率层序地层划分提供了新思路。

关键词: 高分辨率, 总体经验模态分解, 本征模态分量, Hilbert变换, 层序地层, 时频分析

Abstract: Dividing sequence boundary of different levels and identifying internal types of sedimentary cycle are important bases of sequence stratigraphic analysis. Logging signals are the superposition of sedimentary cycles in different periods. It can be applied to classify the sequence boundaries of different levels,and identify the types of cycles by time-frequency analysis which can expand the information of stratigraphic cycle hidden in the well logging data into different frequency bands. Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition(EEMD) was applied to decompose well logging data into Intrinsic Mode Functions of different frequency banks,then the frequency information of each components can be obtained by Hilbert transform. Stratigraphic sequence was divided according to the relationship between the periodic fluctuation of each components and the different types of sedimentary cycle, as well as the relationship between the frequency characteristics of each components and sequence boundaries of all levels. The application in the third member of Shahejie Formation of Dongying Sag shows that this method is suitable for the cycle division of short-term,medium-term and long-term. It provides a new idea for division of high-resolution sequence stratigraphy.

Key words: high resolution, Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition, Intrinsic Mode Function, Hilbert transform, sequence stratigraphy, time-frequency analysis

中图分类号: 

  • TE121.3
[1] 闫建平,蔡进功,赵铭海,等.测井信息用于层序地层单元划分及对比研究综述.地层学杂志,2009,33(4):441-450. YAN J P,CAI J G,ZHAO M H,et al. Advances in the study of sequence stratigraphic division and correlation using well log information. Journal of Stratigraphy,2009,33(4):441-450.
[2] 郑小武,邓宏文,徐怀大,等.测井高分辨率层序地层自动划分技术与应用尝试.石油与天然气地质,1999,20(4):357-360. ZHENG X W,DENG H W,XU H D,et al. Automatic recognizing technique of log high-resolution sequence stratigraphy and its application. Oil & Gas Geology,1999,20(4):357-360.
[3] 李江涛,李增学,余继峰,等.基于测井数据小波变换的层序地层对比——以鲁西和济阳地区石炭、二叠系含煤地层为例.沉积学报,2005,23(4):639-645. LI J T,LI Z X,YU J F,et al. Stratigraphic sequence correlation based on wavelet transform of well logging data:Taking the coal bearing strata of Permo-Carboniferous system in Luxi and Jiyang area as an example. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2005, 23(4):639-645.
[4] 赵淑娥,王华,刘小龙,等.基于测井数据的高精度层序地层定量划分方法及其应用.中南大学学报(自然科学版),2013, 44(1):233-240. ZHAO S E,WANG H,LIU X L,et al. A method for quantitative division of sequence stratigraphy with high-resolution using loggingdata and its application. Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology),2013,44(1):233-240.
[5] 张莹,潘保芝,黄布宙,等.测井资料小波变换在高分辨率层序地层划分中的应用.物探化探计算技术,2008,30(1):58-62. ZHANG Y,PAN B Z,HUANG B Z,et al. An application of wavelet transform to logging data for high resolution sequence stratigraphic division. Computing Techniques for Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration,2008,30(1):58-62.
[6] 任金峰,廖远涛,孙鸣,等.基于小波变换的高精度层序地层定量划分研究及应用. 地球物理学进展,2013,28(5):2651-2658. REN J F,LIAO Y T,SUN M,et al. A method for quantitative division of sequence stratigraphy with high-resolution based on wavelet transform and its application. Progress in Geophysics, 2013,28(5):2651-2658.
[7] 付文钊,余继峰,杨锋杰,等. 小波变换与Hilbert-Huang变换应用于层序划分的比较. 煤炭学报,2013,38(增刊2):434-441. FU W Z,YU J F,YANG F J,et al. Comparative study of the application of wavelet transform and Hilbert-Huang transform to the demarcation of sequences. Journal of China Coal Society, 2013,38(Suppl 2):434-441.
[8] 徐敬领,王贵文,刘洛夫,等. 基于经验模态分解法的层序地层划分及对比研究.石油物探,2010,49(2):182-186. XU J L,WANG G W,LIU L F,et al. Study on sequence stratigraphic division and correlation based on method of empirical mode decomposition. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2010,49(2):182-186.
[9] 赵妮,李瑞,陈立军.经验模态分解法在测井层序界面识别中的应用.测井技术,2014,38(4):474-479. ZHAO N,LI R,CHEN L J. Application of Empirical Mode Decomposition(EMD) to interface identification of logging sequence strata. Well Logging Technology,2014,38(4):474-479.
[10] 文政,朱筱敏,金明玉,等.基于测井数据Hilbert-Huang变换的地层层序划分.测井技术,2007,31(6):533-536. WEN Z,ZHU X M,JIN M Y,et al. Demarcating stratigraphic sequence based on Hilbert-Huang transform of well-logging data. Well Logging Technology,2007,31(6):533-536.
[11] HUANG N E,SHEN Z,LONG S R,et al. The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and nonstationary time series analysis. Proceedings of the Royal Society, 1998,454:903-995.
[12] XUE Y J,CAO J X,DU H K,et al. Does mode mixing matter in EMD-based highlight volume methods for hydrocarbon detection? Experimental evidence. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2016,132:193-210.
[13] 贾瑞生,赵同彬,孙红梅,等.基于经验模态分解及独立成分分析的微震信号降噪方法.地球物理学报,2015,58(3):1013-1023. JIA R S,ZHAO T B,SUN H M,et al. Micro-seismic signal denoising method based on Empirical Mode Decomposition and independent component analysis. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2015,58(3):1013-1023.
[14] 李彦军,胡祥云,何展翔. HHT变换在地球物理中的应用现状及前景.工程地球物理学报,2010,7(5):537-544. LI Y J,HU X Y,HE Z X. Application situation and prospects of Hilbert-Huang Transform in geophysics. Chinese Journal of Engineering Geophysics,2010,7(5):537-544.
[15] WANG T,ZHANG M C,YU Q H,et al. Comparing the application of EMD and EEMD on time-frequency analysis of seimic signal. Journal of Applied Geophysics,2012,83(6):29-34.
[16] 时世晨,单佩韦. 基于EEMD的信号处理方法分析和实现. 现代电子技术,2011,34(1):88-90. SHI S C,SHAN P W. Signal processing method based on Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition. Modern Electronics Technique,2011,34(1):88-90.
[17] YEH J R,SHIEH J S,HUANGN E. Complementary Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition:a novel noise enhanced data analysis method. Advances in Adaptive Data Analysis,2010,2(2):135-156.
[18] GACI S. A new Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition (EEMD) denoising method for seismic signals. Energy Procedia, 2016,97:84-91.
[19] 朱剑兵.基于测井资料的高分辨率层序旋回划分方法探讨. 油气地球物理,2011,9(4):6-11. ZHU J B. The discussion on the division methods of high resolution sequence cycle based on logging data. Petroleum Geophysics,2011,9(4):6-11.
[20] 刘腾,王军,张京思,等. 地震Wheeler域变换结合时频分析技术用于渤海油田岩性油气藏描述.岩性油气藏,2018,30(1):124-132. LIU T,WANG J,ZHANG J S,et al. Application of Wheeler Transform combined with time-frequency analysis technology to lithologic reservoir characterization of Bohai Oilfield. Lithologic Reservoirs,2018,30(1):124-132.
[21] 李振春,刁瑞,韩文功,等.线性时频分析方法综述.勘探地球物理进展,2010,33(4):239-246. LI Z C,DIAO R,HAN W G,et al. Review on linear timefrequency analysis methods. Progress in Exploration Geophysics, 2010,33(4):239-246.
[22] 吴淑玉,刘俊.基于时频分析的高分辨率层序地层.海洋地质与第四纪地质,2015,35(4):197-207. WU S Y,LIU J. High resolution sequence stratigraphic study basic on time-frequency analysis. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology,2015,35(4):197-207.
[23] 邓继新,王尚旭,伍向阳.渤海湾盆地东营凹陷砂岩储层地震特征及对岩石结构的指示.石油与天然气地质,2009,30(3):294-299. DENG J X,WANG S X,WU X Y. Seismic properties of reservoir sand stones and their implication to rock texture in the Dongying Sag,the Bohai Bay Basin. Oil & Gas Geology,2009, 30(3):294-299.
[24] 王伟庆,刘宁,田方. 东营凹陷牛庄地区沙三段层序地层分析.地层学杂志,2007,31(增刊2):567-572. WANG W Q,LIU N,TIAN F. Sequence stratigraphic analysis of the member 3 of Shahejie Formation in the Niuzhuang area of the Dongying Depression. Journal of Stratigraphy,2007,31(Suppl 2):567-572.
[25] 姜在兴,杨伟利,操应长.东营凹陷沙河街组三段-二段下亚段沉积层序及成因.石油与天然气地质,2002,23(2):127-129. JIANG Z X,YANG W L,CAO Y C. Origin and sedimentary sequence of Es3-Es2 in Shahejie Formation of Dongying Depression. Oil & Gas Geology,2002,23(2):127-129.
[26] 操应长,姜在兴,夏斌,等. 陆相断陷湖盆T-R层序的特点及其控制因素——以东营凹陷古近系沙河街组三段层序地层为例.地质科学,2004,39(1):111-122. CAO Y C,JIANG Z X,XIA B,et al. Characters and controlling factors of T-R sequence in lacustrine deposits of rift basin:an example from the Dongying Depression,eastern China. Chinese Journal of Geology,2004,39(1):111-122.
[1] 苏勤, 曾华会, 徐兴荣, 王德英, 孟会杰. 沙漠区地震数据高分辨率处理关键方法及其在尼日尔Agedem地区的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 18-28.
[2] 罗贝维, 尹继全, 胡广成, 陈华, 康敬程, 肖萌, 朱秋影, 段海岗. 阿联酋西部地区白垩系森诺曼阶高孔渗灰岩储层特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 63-71.
[3] 李凌, 张照坤, 李明隆, 倪佳, 耿超, 唐思哲, 杨文杰, 谭秀成. 四川盆地威远—高石梯地区二叠系栖霞阶层序地层特征及有利储层分布[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 32-46.
[4] 刘永立, 李国蓉, 何钊, 田家奇, 李肖肖. 塔北地区寒武系层序地层格架与台缘带展布特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 80-91.
[5] 文华国, 梁金同, 周刚, 邱玉超, 刘四兵, 李堃宇, 和源, 陈浩如. 四川盆地及周缘寒武系洗象池组层序-岩相古地理演化与天然气有利勘探区带[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(2): 1-16.
[6] 王乔, 宋立新, 韩亚杰, 赵会民, 刘颖. 辽河西部凹陷雷家地区古近系沙三段沉积体系及层序地层[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(6): 102-113.
[7] 张文文, 韩长城, 田继军, 张治恒, 张楠, 李正强. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组层序地层划分及演化特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(5): 45-58.
[8] 赵岩, 毛宁波, 陈旭. 基于时频域信噪比的自适应增益限反Q滤波方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 85-92.
[9] 刘桓, 苏勤, 曾华会, 孟会杰, 张小美, 雍运动. 近地表Q补偿技术在川中地区致密气勘探中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 104-112.
[10] 罗晓彤, 文华国, 彭才, 李云, 赵研. 巴西桑托斯盆地L油田BV组湖相碳酸盐岩沉积特征及高精度层序划分[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3): 68-81.
[11] 刁瑞. 地震数据提高分辨率处理监控评价技术[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(1): 94-101.
[12] 杨占龙, 沙雪梅, 魏立花, 黄军平, 肖冬生. 地震隐性层序界面识别、高频层序格架建立与岩性圈闭勘探——以吐哈盆地西缘侏罗系—白垩系为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(6): 1-13.
[13] 赵汉卿, 温慧芸, 穆朋飞, 李超, 吴穹螈. 垦利A油田沙三上段近源辫状河三角洲沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(3): 37-44.
[14] 芮志锋, 林畅松, 杜家元, 丁琳, 李潇. 关键层序界面识别及其在岩性油气藏勘探中的意义——以惠州凹陷珠江组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(1): 96-105.
[15] 石战战, 王元君, 唐湘蓉, 庞溯, 池跃龙. 一种基于时频域波形分类的储层预测方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(4): 98-104.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 段天向, 刘晓梅, 张亚军, 肖述琴. Petrel 建模中的几点认识[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 102 -107 .
[2] 张立秋. 南二区东部二类油层上返层系组合优化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 116 -120 .
[3] 张娣，侯中健，王亚辉，王莹，王春联. 板桥—北大港地区沙河街组沙一段湖相碳酸盐岩沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(4): 92 -97 .
[4] 樊怀才，李晓平，窦天财，吴欣袁. 应力敏感效应的气井流量动态特征研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(4): 130 -134 .
[5] 田淑芳，张鸿文. 应用生命周期旋回理论预测辽河油田石油探明储量增长趋势[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 98 -100 .
[6] 杨凯，郭肖. 裂缝性低渗透油藏三维两相黑油数值模拟研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(3): 118 -121 .
[7] 翟中喜，秦伟军，郭金瑞. 油气充满度与储层通道渗流能力的定量关系———以泌阳凹陷双河油田岩性油藏为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(4): 92 -95 .
[8] 戚明辉，陆正元，袁帅，李新华. 塔河油田12 区块油藏水体来源及出水特征分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(4): 115 -119 .
[9] 李相博,陈启林,刘化清,完颜容,慕敬魁,廖建波,魏立花. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组3种沉积物重力流及其含油气性[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(3): 16 -21 .
[10] 刘云， 卢渊，伊向艺，张俊良，张锦良，王振喜. 天然气水合物预测模型及其影响因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(3): 124 -127 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发