岩性油气藏 ›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5): 51–58.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20180506

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

延长油气区页岩气可采系数标定研究

刘刚, 赵谦平, 刘超, 孙建博, 尹锦涛   

  1. 陕西延长石油(集团)有限责任公司 研究院, 西安 710075
  • 收稿日期:2017-09-27 修回日期:2018-04-04 出版日期:2018-09-14 发布日期:2018-09-14
  • 第一作者:刘刚(1985-),男,硕士,工程师,主要从事非常规油气勘探开发领域的研究。地址:(710075)陕西省西安市高新区科技二路75号延长石油研究院。Email:liugang8558@126.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国土资源部“十三五”全国油气资源评价项目课题“延长石油矿权区油气资源评价”(编号:2017YQZYPJ0110)资助

Recoverable coefficient calibration of shale gas in Yanchang Oilfield,Ordos Basin

LIU Gang, ZHAO Qianping, LIU Chao, SUN Jianbo, YIN Jintao   

  1. Research Institute of Shaanxi Yanchang Petroleum(Group) Co., Ltd, Xi'an 710075, China
  • Received:2017-09-27 Revised:2018-04-04 Online:2018-09-14 Published:2018-09-14

摘要: 在勘探开发程度较低的页岩气区块,可采系数标定成为区块开展页岩气可采资源量评价工作的重要方法,然而国内目前尚未对页岩气可采系数标定进行系统研究。为填补国内页岩气可采系数标定研究的技术缺失,以延长油气区页岩气区块作为研究对象,结合研究区当前勘探特征,综合选取出3种适用于当前页岩气勘探程度的页岩气标定方法(类比法、参数加权法和等温吸附法),根据3种方法在实际区块的可靠度分析进行特尔菲加权,获取区块准确的页岩气可采系数,最终探究出适合页岩气低勘探程度条件的区块可采系数标定方法。应用延长油气区页岩气勘探成果和认识对页岩气可采系数标定方法进行了实际应用,最终得到延长油气区页岩气中生界可采系数为0.132,上古生界可采系数为0.201。该方法对延长油气区页岩气的深入勘探开发具有指导作用,同时可为国内类似页岩气区块的可采资源量评价研究提供技术借鉴。

关键词: 页岩气, 可采资源量, 可采系数, 延长油田

Abstract: The recoverable coefficient calibration of shale gas is the preferred method of shale gas resources evaluation for the area of low exploration degree. To take the shale gas zone in Yanchang Oilfield as the target,three fitting methods(analogy method,parameter weighting method and isothermal adsorption method) were used to calibrate the shale gas recoverable coefficient. Delphi weighting method was used to get accurate result in the actual block. With the exploration achievements of shale gas in Yanchang Oilfield,the method in this paper was used to calibrate the shale gas recoverable coefficient. The results show that the value of Triassic Yancheng Formation is 0.132,and the value of Upper Paleozoic Shanxi Formation and Benxi Formation is 0.201. The result could be important guidance for further exploration and development of shale gas in Yanchang Oilfield,it can also provide associated technical reference for the shale gas evaluation research in the other basins.

Key words: shale gas, recoverable resources, recoverable coefficient, Yanchang Oilfield

中图分类号: 

  • TE155
[1] 张大伟,李玉喜,张金川,等.全国页岩气资源潜力调查评价. 北京:地质出版社,2012:65-79. ZHANG D W,LI Y X,ZHANG J C,et al. The national survey of shale gasresource potential evaluation. Beijing:Geological Publishing House,2012:65-79.
[2] 马宁,侯读杰,包书景,等.页岩气资源潜力评价方法.油气地质与采收率,2012,19(6):25-29. MA N,HOU D J,BAO S J,et al. Evaluation method of shale gas resource potential. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2012,19(6):25-29.
[3] 刘成林,李景明,杜秀芳,等.天然气资源评价重点参数-可采系数研究.西南石油学院学报,2004,26(3):9-11. LIU C L,LI J M,DU X F,et al. Study on the key parameters of natural gas resource evaluation-recoverable coefficient. Journal of Southwest Petroleum Institute,2004,26(3):9-11.
[4] 刘成林,车长波,朱杰,等. 油气资源可采系数研究. 石油学报,2009,30(6):856-861. LIU C L,CHE C B,ZHU J,et al. Study on recoverable coefficient of oil and gasresources. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2009,30(6):856-861.
[5] 袁媛,杜克锋,葛云锦,等.鄂尔多斯盆地甘泉-富县地区长7烃源岩地球化学特征.岩性油气藏,2018,30(1):39-45. YUAN Y,DU K F,GE Y J,et al. Geochemistry of hydrocarbon source rocks of Chang 7 in Ganquan-Fuxian area,Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs,2018,30(1):39-45.
[6] 熊健,罗丹序,刘向君,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组页岩孔隙结构特征及其控制因素.岩性油气藏,2016,28(2):16-23. XIONG J,LUO D X,LIU X J,et al. Characteristics and controlling factors of shale pore structure of Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs,2016,28(2):16-23.
[7] 刘宝平. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长气田储层压力特征与含气性关系.延安大学学报(自然科学版),2015,34(1):74-77. LIU B P. Pressure characteristics of reservoir and accumulations of nature gas in Yanchang gas field of Ordos Basin. Journal of Yanan University(Natural Science Edition),2015,34(1):74-77.
[8] 曹跃,银晓,赵谦平,等.鄂尔多斯盆地南部延长探区上古生界烃源岩特征与勘探方向. 中国石油勘探,2015,20(3):13-21. CAO Y,YIN X,ZHAO Q P,et al. Characteristics and exploration direction of Upper Paleozoic source rock in Yanchang block of southern Ordos Basin. China Petroleum Exploration,2015, 20(3):13-21.
[9] 王玉满,黄金亮,王淑芳,等.四川盆地长宁、焦石坝志留系龙马溪组页岩气刻度区精细解剖. 天然气地球科学,2016,27(3):423-432. WANG Y M,HUANG J L,WANG S F,et al. Dissection of two calibrated areas of the Silurian Longmaxi Formation,Changning and Jiaoshiba,Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Geoscience,2016,27(3):423-432.
[10] 何文军,王绪龙,杨海波,等.准噶尔盆地典型刻度区选择及其资源量计算方法体系建立.天然气地球科学,2017,28(1):62-73. HE W J,WANG X L,YANG H B,et al. Selection of typical calibrated areas and establishment of the calculation method system of the quantity of resource in Junggar Basin. Natural Gas Geoscience,2017,28(1):62-73.
[11] 李勇,汤达祯,许浩,等.国外典型煤层气盆地可采资源量计算.煤田地质与勘探,2014,42(2):23-27. LI Y,TANG D Z,XU H,et al. Calculation of abroad coalbed methane recoverable resources. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2014,42(2):23-27.
[12] 刘正.山西省煤层气资源量及可采潜力.中国煤炭地质,2014, 26(9):17-23. LIU Z. CBM resources and exploitable potential in Shanxi province. Coal Geology of China,2014,26(9):17-23.
[13] 陈春琳,林大杨.等温吸附曲线方法在煤层气可采资源量估算中的应用.中国矿业大学学报,2005,34(5):86-88. CHEN C L,LIN D Y. Application of isothermal curves in estimating minable resource of coalbed methane. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,2005,34(5):86-88.
[14] 张文忠,许浩,傅小康.利用等温吸附曲线估算柳林区块煤层气可采资源量.东北石油大学学报,2010,34(1):29-32. ZHANG W Z,XU H,FU X K. Estimation of the recoverable resources Liulin block utilization of coalbed methane isothermal adsorption curve. Journal of Daqing Petroleum Institute,2010, 34(1):29-32.
[15] 寇雨,周文,赵毅楠,等.鄂尔多斯盆地长7油层组页岩吸附特征与类型及吸附气量影响因素. 岩性油气藏,2016,28(6):52-57. KOU Y,ZHOU W,ZHAO Y N,et al. Adsorption characteristics,types and influencing factors of Chang 7 shale of Triassic Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016,28(6):52-57.
[16] LOUCKS R G,REED R M,RUPPEL S C,et al. Spectrum of pore types and networks in mudrocks and adescriptive classification formatrix-related mudrocks pore. AAPG Bulletin,2012, 96(6):1071-1098.
[17] 张永生,孙文卿,高学通.煤储层理论临界解吸压力与实际排采对比研究.山西焦煤科技,2011,1(1):4-7. ZHANG Y S,SUN W Q,GAO X T. Comparative study between theoretical critical desorption pressure and actual drainage and mining state of coal reservoir. Shanxi Coking Coal Science & Technology,2011,1(1):4-7.
[18] 蒲泊伶,包书景,王毅,等.页岩气成藏条件分析-以美国页岩气盆地为例.石油地质与工程,2008,22(3):33-38. PU B L,BAO S J,WANG Y,et al. Analysis of shale gas accumulation conditions:a case study of shale gas basins in the United States. Petroleum Geology and Engineering,2008,22(3):33-38.
[19] 陈更生,董大忠,王世谦,等.页岩气藏形成机理及富集规律初探.天然气工业,2009,29(5):17-21. CHEN G S,DONG D Z,WANG S Q,et al. A preliminary study on accumulation mechanism and enrichment pattern of shale gas. Natural Gas Industry,2009,29(5):17-21.
[20] 朱彤,包书景,王烽,等.四川盆地陆相页岩气形成条件及勘探开发前景.天然气工业,2012,32(9):16-21. ZHU T,BAO S J,WANG F,et al. Pool conditions of non-marine shale gas in the Sichuan Basin and its exploration and development prospect. Natural Gas Geoscience,2012,32(9):16-21.
[21] 王伟峰,刘鹏,陈晨,等. 岩气成藏理论及资源评价方法.天然气地球科学,2013,24(3):429-438. WANG W F,LIU P,CHEN C,et al. The study of shale gas reservoir theory and resources evaluation. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2013,24(3):429-438.
[22] 李玉喜,张金川,姜生玲,等.页岩气地质综合评价及目标优选.地学前缘,2012,19(5):332-338. LI Y X,ZHANG J C,JIANG S L,et al. Geological evaluation and targets optimization of shale gas. Earth Science Frontiers, 2012,19(5):332-338.
[23] 赵旭东,崔凤文.用于石油资源评价的特尔菲法.石油勘探与开发,1983,10(3):79-82. ZHAO X D,CUI F W. Delphi method for petroleum resource evaluation. Petroleum Exploration and Development,1983,10(3):79-82.
[24] 孙哲.塔里木盆地塔北隆起奥陶系刻度区解剖与油气资源计算.吉林:吉林大学,2014. SUN Z. Dissection and petroleum resources calculation of calibrated units of Ordovician in Tabei uplift,Tarim Basin. Jilin:Jilin University,2014.
[25] 姜生玲,郑兆惠,邓飞涌,等.鄂尔多斯盆地杭锦旗地区两种类型天然气资源量计算.石油天然气学报,2008,30(5):184-187. JIANG S L,ZHENG Z H,DENG F Y,et al. Calculation of two types of natural gas resources in Hangjinqi area of Ordos Basin. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology,2008,30(5):184-187.
[1] 闫建平, 来思俣, 郭伟, 石学文, 廖茂杰, 唐洪明, 胡钦红, 黄毅. 页岩气井地质工程套管变形类型及影响因素研究进展[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 1-14.
[2] 杨学锋, 赵圣贤, 刘勇, 刘绍军, 夏自强, 徐飞, 范存辉, 李雨桐. 四川盆地宁西地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气富集主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 99-110.
[3] 包汉勇, 赵帅, 张莉, 刘皓天. 川东红星地区中上二叠统页岩气勘探成果及方向展望[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 12-24.
[4] 申有义, 王凯峰, 唐书恒, 张松航, 郗兆栋, 杨晓东. 沁水盆地榆社—武乡区块二叠系煤系页岩储层地质建模及“甜点”预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 98-108.
[5] 段逸飞, 赵卫卫, 杨天祥, 李富康, 李慧, 王嘉楠, 刘钰晨. 鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区二叠系山西组页岩气源储特征及聚集规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 72-83.
[6] 程静, 闫建平, 宋东江, 廖茂杰, 郭伟, 丁明海, 罗光东, 刘延梅. 川南长宁地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气储层低电阻率响应特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 31-39.
[7] 杨博伟, 石万忠, 张晓明, 徐笑丰, 刘俞佐, 白卢恒, 杨洋, 陈相霖. 黔南地区下石炭统打屋坝组页岩气储层孔隙结构特征及含气性评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 45-58.
[8] 魏全超, 李小佳, 李峰, 郝景宇, 邓双林, 吴娟, 邓宾, 王道军. 四川盆地米仓山前缘旺苍地区下寒武统筇竹寺组裂缝脉体发育特征及意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 62-70.
[9] 杨跃明, 张少敏, 金涛, 明盈, 郭蕊莹, 王兴志, 韩璐媛. 川南地区二叠系龙潭组页岩储层特征及勘探潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(1): 1-11.
[10] 闫建平, 罗静超, 石学文, 钟光海, 郑马嘉, 黄毅, 唐洪明, 胡钦红. 川南泸州地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩裂缝发育模式及意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 60-71.
[11] 邱晨, 闫建平, 钟光海, 李志鹏, 范存辉, 张悦, 胡钦红, 黄毅. 四川盆地泸州地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩沉积微相划分及测井识别[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(3): 117-130.
[12] 张梦琳, 李郭琴, 何嘉, 衡德. 川西南缘天宫堂构造奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气富集主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(2): 141-151.
[13] 尹兴平, 蒋裕强, 付永红, 张雪梅, 雷治安, 陈超, 张海杰. 渝西地区五峰组—龙马溪组龙一1亚段页岩岩相及储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 41-51.
[14] 向雪冰, 司马立强, 王亮, 李军, 郭宇豪, 张浩. 页岩气储层孔隙流体划分及有效孔径计算——以四川盆地龙潭组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 137-146.
[15] 丛平, 闫建平, 井翠, 张家浩, 唐洪明, 王军, 耿斌, 王敏, 晁静. 页岩气储层可压裂性级别测井评价及展布特征——以川南X地区五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 177-188.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 黄思静,黄培培,王庆东,刘昊年,吴 萌,邹明亮. 胶结作用在深埋藏砂岩孔隙保存中的意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 7 -13 .
[2] 刘震, 陈艳鹏, 赵阳,, 郝奇, 许晓明, 常迈. 陆相断陷盆地油气藏形成控制因素及分布规律概述[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 121 -127 .
[3] 丁超,郭兰,闫继福. 子长油田安定地区延长组长6 油层成藏条件分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(1): 46 -50 .
[4] 李彦山,张占松,张超谟,陈鹏. 应用压汞资料对长庆地区长6 段储层进行分类研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(2): 91 -93 .
[5] 罗 鹏,李国蓉,施泽进,周大志,汤鸿伟,张德明. 川东南地区茅口组层序地层及沉积相浅析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(2): 74 -78 .
[6] 左国平,屠小龙,夏九峰. 苏北探区火山岩油气藏类型研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(2): 37 -41 .
[7] 王飞宇. 提高热采水平井动用程度的方法与应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(Z1): 100 -103 .
[8] 袁云峰,才业,樊佐春,姜懿洋,秦启荣,蒋庆平. 准噶尔盆地红车断裂带石炭系火山岩储层裂缝特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(1): 47 -51 .
[9] 袁剑英,付锁堂,曹正林,阎存凤,张水昌,马达德. 柴达木盆地高原复合油气系统多源生烃和复式成藏[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(3): 7 -14 .
[10] 石战战,贺振华,文晓涛,唐湘蓉. 一种基于EMD 和GHT 的储层识别方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(3): 102 -105 .