地震数据提高分辨率处理监控评价技术

doi:10.12108/yxyqc.20200110

岩性油气藏 ›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1): 94–101.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20200110

地震数据提高分辨率处理监控评价技术

刁瑞

中国石化胜利油田分公司物探研究院, 山东东营 257022

收稿日期:2019-07-23 修回日期:2019-09-27 出版日期:2020-01-21 发布日期:2019-11-22
第一作者:刁瑞(1985-),男,博士,副研究员,主要从事地震数据处理和油气地球物理方法方面的研究工作。地址:(257022)山东省东营市北一路210号物探研究院。Email:diaorui1985@163.com。
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项“渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷致密油开发示范工程”（编号：2017ZX05072）资助

Monitoring and evaluation technology for high resolution processing of seismic data

DIAO Rui

Geophysical Research Institute of Shengli Oilfield Company, Sinopec, Dongying 257022, Shandong, China

Received:2019-07-23 Revised:2019-09-27 Online:2020-01-21 Published:2019-11-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 薄互层岩性油气藏逐渐成为勘探开发的重点领域，薄层砂体对提高分辨率处理方法及效果保真性提出了更高的要求。在对地震数据提高分辨率处理的过程中，研究工作主要集中在提高分辨率处理算法方面，缺少系统全面的提高分辨率处理效果的监控评价技术。针对提高地震分辨率处理效果质量监控的迫切需求，开展了提高地震分辨率处理效果监控评价技术研究，从9个方面的属性特征对提高分辨率处理流程进行了全面可靠的监控，实现了处理效果的定量化评价分析，从而高效优选出提高分辨率处理方法、流程和参数，获得了最佳的高分辨率数据。该技术在准噶尔盆地中部庄3井地区进行了推广应用，对提高分辨率处理进行了全流程的评价分析，解决了常规处理参数试验繁琐的难题，提高地震分辨率处理后薄层砂体的识别能力显著增强。

关键词: 地震数据, 高分辨率, 效果评价, 软件模块, 效果保真

Abstract: Thin-bedded lithologic reservoirs have gradually become an important field of exploration and development. Thin-bedded sand bodies require higher requirements for improving resolution processing methods and results fidelity. In the processing of high resolution,the research mainly focuses on high resolution algorithm, and lacks systematic and comprehensive monitoring and evaluation methods. In order to meet the urgent need of improving resolution,the research of monitoring and evaluation technology for improving seismic resolution was carried out. The processing flow of improving high resolution was monitored comprehensively and reliably from nine aspects of attribute characteristics,and the quantitative evaluation and analysis of processing results was realized. Thus,the processing technology,process and parameters of improving resolution were optimized efficiently,so as to obtain the best high-resolution data. This technology has been applied in Zhuang-3 well area in the central of Junggar Basin. The whole processing of improving high resolution was evaluated and analyzed. The problems of conventional processing parameter test were solved,and the recognition ability of thin sand body was significantly enhanced after improving seismic resolution.

Key words: seismic data, high resolution, effect evaluation, software module, effect fidelity

中图分类号:

P631.4

刁瑞. 地震数据提高分辨率处理监控评价技术[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(1): 94–101.

DIAO Rui. Monitoring and evaluation technology for high resolution processing of seismic data[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(1): 94–101.

参考文献

[1] 李庆忠. 岩性油气藏地震勘探若干问题的讨论(Ⅱ):关于垂向分辨率的认识. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(3):1-5. LI Q Z. Discussion on seismic exploration of lithologic reservoirs(Ⅱ):Seismic vertical resolution. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(3):1-5.
[2] 姚健, 郑敬贵, 杜晓峰, 等. 辽东湾探区古近系浊积体针对性地震处理与识别技术. 岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(1):69-73. YAO J, ZHENG J G, DU X F, et al. Seismic processing and identification technology for Paleogene turbidite in Liaodong Bay. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2012, 24(1):69-73.
[3] 徐兴荣, 苏勤, 王劲松, 等. 加权MPFI方法及其在三维连片处理中的应用. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(1):122-129. WANG X R, SU Q, WANG J S, et al. Weighted MPFI method and its application in 3D joint processing. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(1):122-129.
[4] 刁瑞.分频带预测反褶积方法研究.断块油气田, 2015, 22(1):53-57. DIAO R. Method of separate frequency predictive deconvolution. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2015, 22(1):53-57.
[5] 王万里, 李国发, 桂金咏. 混合相位子波有色反褶积. 岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(3):82-86. WANG W L, LI G F, GUI J Y. Colored deconvolution of mixed phase wavelet. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2013, 25(3):82-86.
[6] 王孝, 刘文卿, 曾华会, 等. 复杂区分层约束近地表建模方法及应用. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(4):68-73. WANG X, LIU W Q, ZENG H H, et al. Stratified constrained near-surface model building method and its application in complex surface area. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(4):68-73.
[7] 杨应, 杨巍, 朱仕军. 基于EEMD的高分辨率层序地层划分方法. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(5):59-67. YANG Y, YANG W, ZHU S J. Method for high-resolution sequence stratigraphy division based on Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(5):59-67.
[8] 刁瑞, 尚新民, 芮拥军, 等.时频域谱模拟反褶积方法研究. 岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(1):116-121. DIAO R, SHANG X M, RUI Y J, et al. Study on spectral modeling deconvolution in time-frequency domain. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2013, 25(1):116-121.
[9] 刘浩杰, 王延光.地震资料分辨率若干问题的探讨. 油气地球物理, 2009, 7(4):5-10. LIU H J, WANG Y G. Discussion of some question on resolution for seismic data. Petroleum Geophysics, 2009, 7(4):5-10.
[10] 李曙光, 唐建明, 徐天吉, 等.几种提高地震资料分辨率的方法及效果分析. 勘探地球物理进展, 2010, 33(5):323-327. LI S G, TANG J M, XU T J, et al. Methods for improving seismic data resolution. Progress in Exploration Geophysics, 2010, 33(5):323-327.
[11] 钱荣钧. 地震波分辨率的分类研究及偏移对分辨率的影响. 石油地球物理勘探, 2010, 45(2):306-313. QIAN R J. Classification studies on seismic resolution and migration's affect to resolution. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2010, 45(2):306-313.
[12] 万欢, 樊小意, 刘涛, 等. 叠前地震资料提高分辨率处理方法及应用. 地球物理学进展, 2012, 27(1):304-311. WAN H, FAN X Y, LIU T, et al. Methods and applications for improving pre-stack seismic data resolution. Progress in Geophysics, 2012, 27(1):304-311.
[13] 王永生, 胡杰, 张静, 等. 宽频勘探技术在柴北缘深层侏罗系勘探中的应用. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(6):101-107. WANG Y S, HU J, ZHANG J, et al. Wide-frequency prospecting technology and its application on deep-seated Jurassic exploration in northern margin of Qaidam Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(6):101-107.
[14] 崔庆辉, 芮拥军, 尚新民, 等.混合相位地震子波提取及应用. 石油物探, 2011, 50(5):481-486. CUI Q H, RUI Y J, SHANG X M, et al. Mixed-phase seismic wavelet extraction and its application. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2011, 50(5):481-486.
[15] 张军华, 臧胜涛, 周振晓, 等. 地震资料信噪比量化计算及方法比较. 石油地球物理勘探, 2009, 44(4):481-486. ZHANG J H, ZANG S T, ZHOU Z X, et al. Quantitative computation and comparison of S/N ratio in seismic data. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2009, 44(4):481-486.
[16] 刁瑞, 冯玉苹. 利用储层的频谱吸收特性识别油气藏. 石油地球物理勘探, 2012, 47(5):766-772. DIAO R, FENG Y P. Hydrocarbon recognition based on spectrum absorption characteristics of reservoir. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2012, 47(5):766-772.
[17] 刁瑞, 吴国忱, 崔庆辉, 等. 地面阵列式微地震监测关键技术研究. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(1):104-109. DIAO R, WU G C, CUI Q H, et al. Key techniques for surface array microseismic monitoring. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(1):104-109.
[18] 冯玉苹, 徐维秀, 刁瑞, 等. 面向地震勘探算法的模块集成技术研究.地球物理学进展, 2017, 32(5):2214-2221. FENG Y P, XU W X, DIAO R, et al. Method of module integration for seismic exploration algorithm. Progress in Geophysics, 2017, 32(5):2214-2221.
[19] 刁瑞, 李振春, 韩文功, 等. 基于广义S变换的吸收衰减分析技术在油气识别中的应用. 石油物探, 2011, 50(3):260-265. DIAO R, LI Z C, HAN W G, et al. Application of absorption and attenuation analysis technique based on generalized S transform for hydrocarbon identification. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2011, 50(3):260-265.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

地震数据提高分辨率处理监控评价技术

Monitoring and evaluation technology for high resolution processing of seismic data

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	苏勤, 曾华会, 徐兴荣, 王德英, 孟会杰. 沙漠区地震数据高分辨率处理关键方法及其在尼日尔Agedem地区的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 18-28.
[2]	孟智强, 葛丽珍, 祝晓林, 王永平, 朱志强. 气顶边水油藏气/水驱产油量贡献评价方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(5): 162-170.
[3]	赵岩, 毛宁波, 陈旭. 基于时频域信噪比的自适应增益限反Q滤波方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 85-92.
[4]	刘桓, 苏勤, 曾华会, 孟会杰, 张小美, 雍运动. 近地表Q补偿技术在川中地区致密气勘探中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 104-112.
[5]	赵岩, 毛宁波. 基于零偏移距VSP的时变子波反褶积方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(6): 88-94.
[6]	贾红兵, 赵辉, 包志晶, 赵光杰, 毛伟, 李亚光. 水驱开发效果评价新方法及其矿场应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(5): 101-107.
[7]	杨应, 杨巍, 朱仕军. 基于EEMD的高分辨率层序地层划分方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(5): 59-67.
[8]	杨占龙, 肖冬生, 周隶华, 黄云峰, 黄小鹏, 沙雪梅. 高分辨率层序格架下的陆相湖盆精细沉积体系研究——以吐哈盆地西缘侏罗系—古近系为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(5): 1-10.
[9]	李晨, 樊太亮, 高志前, 钱小会, 傅巍. 冲积扇高分辨率层序地层分析——以辽河坳陷曙一区杜84块SAGD开发区馆陶组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(3): 66-75.
[10]	孟昊，钟大康,朱筱敏，刘自亮，廖纪佳,张修强 . 鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区延长组 LSC3 层序格架与沉积相[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(1): 77-87.
[11]	明君，刘力辉,丁燕,李聪. 基于 CRP 道集的频宽一致性子波反褶积技术[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(6): 97-103.
[12]	张宇飞，苑昊. 陆上多次波识别与压制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(6): 104-110.
[13]	刘小亮，王超勇. 川中潼南地区须家河组二段高分辨率层序地层学研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(1): 45-50.
[14]	许晓宏，潘威，郭增强，戴立飞. 胡力海洼陷高分辨率层序地层对比[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(6): 72-75.
[15]	黄龙，田景春，王峰. 富县地区延长组高分辨率层序地层分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(6): 88-93.