岩性油气藏 ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 152–160.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20230313

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

塔里木盆地顺北油气田奥陶系断控缝洞型储层特征及成藏模式

卜旭强, 王来源, 朱莲花, 黄诚, 朱秀香   

  1. 中国石化西北油田分公司 勘探开发研究院, 乌鲁木齐 830000
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-18 修回日期:2022-09-28 出版日期:2023-05-01 发布日期:2023-04-25
  • 第一作者:卜旭强（1987—），男，本科，副研究员，主要从事储层与油气成藏综合研究。地址：（830000）新疆乌鲁木齐市新市区长春南路466号西北石油科研生产园区。Email：nanshanjushi123@126.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金企业创新发展联合基金项目 “克拉通盆地内部走滑断裂体系成因及控藏机制研究——以塔里木盆地为例”（编号： 2022-2025） 与中国石化科技部项目 “顺北超深碳酸盐岩规模储集体发育模式与评价”（编号： P21033-1）、“顺北超深碳酸盐岩高产富集规律与目标评价”（编号： P21033-3） 联合资助。

Characteristics and reservoir accumulation model of Ordovician fault-controlled fractured-vuggy reservoirs in Shunbei oil and gas field，Tarim Basin

BU Xuqiang, WANG Laiyuan, ZHU Lianhua, HUANG Cheng, ZHU Xiuxiang   

  1. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, Northwest Oilfield Company, Sinopec, Urumqi 830000, China
  • Received:2022-08-18 Revised:2022-09-28 Online:2023-05-01 Published:2023-04-25

PDF (PC)

358

摘要： 顺北油气田为塔里木盆地重要的产油气区。根据钻井动态、岩心分析、测井、地震等资料,结合酸化压裂曲线及试井资料等对塔里木盆地顺北油气田奥陶系断控缝洞型储层的特征及成藏模式进行了研究。研究结果表明:①顺北油气田奥陶系断控缝洞型储层是伴随走滑断裂发育的一类特殊储层,垂直于断裂带发育,由基岩-裂缝带-洞穴带有序排列组成的多组缝洞集合体,洞穴带和裂缝带是其主要的储集空间,地震上的识别特征为断裂-串珠-杂乱强反射。②研究区规模较大的断控缝洞型储层的改造曲线具有初始泵压低、最大压降大,停泵压力低等特征,北东断裂体系的①号、④号、⑧号断裂带的钻井压力恢复曲线均呈"W"-箱形形态。③按照地震响应特征和试井压力恢复曲线形态可将研究区的断控缝洞型储层划分为洞穴型和裂缝型两大类,按试井压力恢复曲线形态可细分为裂缝-多洞穴型、裂缝-洞穴型、洞穴-裂缝型和裂缝型4类。④研究区断控缝洞型油气藏油源来自于玉尔吐斯组,沿走滑断裂运移,以孔洞和裂缝为储集空间,盖层为致密碳酸盐岩和巨厚泥岩。

关键词: 酸化压裂曲线, 试井压力恢复曲线, 断裂带, 断控缝洞型储层, 奥陶系, 顺北油气田, 塔里木盆地

Abstract: Shunbei oil and gas field is an important oil and gas producing area in Tarim Basin. Based on drilling performance，core analysis，logging and seismic data，combined with acid fracturing curve and well test data， the characteristics and reservoir accumulation model of Ordovician fault-controlled fractured-vuggy reservoirs in Shunbei oil and gas field of Tarim Basin were studied. The results show that：（1）Fault-controlled fractured-vuggy reservoir of Ordovician in Shunbei oil and gas field is a special type of reservoir formed with the development of strike-slip faults. Vertical to the fault zone，multiple groups of fractured-vuggy aggregates composed of bedrockfracture zone-cave zone are developed，and cave zone and fracture zone are the main reservoir spaces. The seismic identification feature of large-scale reservoirs is fault-bead-disorder strong reflection.（2）The reconstruction curve of large-scale fault-controlled fractured-vuggy reservoirs in the study area has the characteristics of low initial pump pressure，large maximum pressure drop and low pump stop pressure. The drilling pressure recovery curves of fault zones ①，④ and ⑧ of the NE fault system are in a W-box shape.（3）According to the characteristics of seismic response and the shape of well test pressure recovery curve，the fault-controlled fractured-vuggy reservoirs in the study area can be divided into two types： cave type and fracture type，and they can be subdivided into four categories according to the shapes of pressure recovery curves： fractured-multi-cave type，fracturedcave type，cave-fracture type and fracture type.（4）The fault-controlled fractured-vuggy reservoirs in the study area have oil source from Yuertusi Formation，and migrate along strike-slip faults. The pores and fractures are the reser-voir spaces， and tight carbonate rocks and thick mudstones are the caprocks.

Key words: Acidizing fracturing curve, well test pressure recovery curve, fault zone, fault-controlled fracturedvuggy reservoir, Ordovician, Shunbei oil and gas field, Tarim Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2
[1] 漆立新.塔里木盆地顺北超深断溶体油藏特征与启示[J].中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(1):102-111. QI Lixin. Characteristics and inspiration of ultra-deep faultkarst reservoir in the Shunbei area of the Tarim Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2020, 25(1):102-111.
[2] 云露,朱秀香.一种新型圈闭:断控缝洞型圈闭[J].石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(1):34-42. YUN Lu, ZHU Xiuxiang. A new trap type:Fault-controlled fracture-vuggy trap[J]. Oil&Gas Geology, 2022, 43(1):34-42.
[3] 马永生,蔡勋育,云露,等.塔里木盆地顺北超深层碳酸盐岩油气田勘探开发实践与理论技术进展[J].石油勘探与开发, 2022, 49(1):1-17. MA Yongsheng, CAI Xunyu, YUN Lu, et al. Practice and theoretical and technical progress in exploration and development of Shunbei ultra-deep carbonate oil and gas field, Tarim Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2022, 49(1):1-17.
[4] 吕海涛,韩俊,张继标,等.塔里木盆地顺北地区超深碳酸盐岩断溶体发育特征与形成机制[J].石油实验地质, 2021, 43(1):14-22. LYU Haitao, HAN Jun, ZHANG Jibiao, et al. Development characteristics and formation mechanism of ultra-deep carbonate fault-dissolution body in Shunbei area, Tarim Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology&Experiment, 2021, 43(1):14-22.
[5] 云露.顺北地区奥陶系超深断溶体油气成藏条件[J].新疆石油地质, 2021, 42(2):136-142. YUN Lu. Hydrocarbon accumulation of ultra-deep Ordovician fault-karst reservoirs in Shunbei area[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2021, 42(2):136-142.
[6] 云露,邓尚.塔里木盆地深层走滑断裂差异变形与控储控藏特征:以顺北油气田为例[J].石油学报, 2022, 43(6):770-787. YUN Lu, DENG Shang. Structural styles of deep strike-slip in Tarim Basin and the characteristics of their control on reservoir formation and hydrocarbon accumulation:A case study of Shunbei oil and gas field[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(6):770-787.
[7] 何登发,周新源,杨海军,等.塔里木盆地克拉通内古隆起的成因机制与构造类型[J].地学前缘, 2008, 15(2):207-221. HE Dengfa, ZHOU Xinyuan, YANG Haijun, et al. Formation mechanism and tectonic types of intracratonic paleo-uplifts in the Tarim Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2008, 15(2):207-221.
[8] 田方磊,何登发,陈槚俊,等.塔里木盆地顺托果勒低隆及邻区加里东中期运动面的构造性质[J].地质科学, 2020, 55(3):813-828. TIAN Fanglei, HE Dengfa, CHEN Jiajun, et al. Structural properties of the Mid-Caledonian Movement surfaces in the Shuntuoguole lower uplift and adjacent area, Tarim Basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 2020, 55(3):813-828.
[9] 王坤,刘伟,黄擎宇,等.多资料约束下的塔里木盆地寒武系层序地层划分与对比[J].海相油气地质, 2016, 21(3):1-12. WANG Kun, LIU Wei, HUANG Qingyu, et al. Division and correlation of Cambrian stratigraphic sequences under multiple data constraint, Tarim Basin[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2016, 21(3):1-12.
[10] 王素英,张翔,田景春,等.塔里木盆地顺北地区柯坪塔格组沉积演化及沉积分异模式[J].岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(5):81-94. WANG Suying, ZHANG Xiang, TIAN Jingchun, et al. Sedimentary evolution and sedimentary differentiation model of Kepingtage Formation in Shunbei area, Tarim Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(5):81-94.
[11] 彭军,夏梦,曹飞,等.塔里木盆地顺北一区奥陶系鹰山组与一间房组沉积特征[J].岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(2):17-30. PENG Jun, XIA Meng, CAO Fei, et at. Sedimentary characteristics of Ordovician Yingshan Formation and Yijianfang Formation in Shunbei-1 area, Tarim Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(2):17-30.
[12] OTTE SEN S. Wellbore stability in fractured rock[R]. SPE 128728, 2010.
[13] 林波,张旭,况安鹏,等.塔里木盆地走滑断裂构造变形特征及油气意义:以顺北地区1号和5号断裂为例[J].石油学报, 2021, 42(7):906-923. LIN Bo, ZHANG Xu, KUANG Anpeng, et al. Structural deformation characteristics of strike-slip faults in Tarim Basin and its hydrocarbon significance:A case of Shunbei No. 1 fault and No.5 fault[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(7):906-923.
[14] 程飞.缝洞型碳酸盐岩油藏储层类型动静态识别方法:以塔里木盆地奥陶系为例[J].岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(3):76-82. CHENG Fei. Integrated dynamic and static identification method of fractured-vuggy carbonate reservoirs:A case from the Ordovician in Tarim Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(3):76-82.
[15] 云露.顺北东部北东向走滑断裂体系控储控藏作用与突破意义[J].中国石油勘探, 2021, 26(3):41-52. YUN Lu. Controlling effect of NE strike-slip fault system on reservoir development and hydrocarbon accumulation in the eastern Shunbei area and its geological significance, Tarim Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2021, 26(3):41-52.
[16] 赵军,海川,张承森.测井储层描述在塔中I号礁滩体中的应用[J].岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2):86-90. ZHAO Jun, HAI Chuan, ZHANG Chengsen. Application of log data in reef flat reservoir description in Tazhong No. 1 slope break[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(2):86-90.
[17] 邹榕,徐中祥,张晓明,等.顺北和托甫台区块奥陶系断裂结构单元测井响应特征初探[J].油气藏评价与开发, 2020, 10(2):18-23. ZOU Rong, XU Zhongxiang, ZHANG Xiaoming, et al. Log response characteristics of Ordovician fracture unit in Shunbei and Tuofutai block[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(2):18-23.
[18] 刘智颖,章成广,唐军,等.裂缝对岩石电阻率的影响及其在含气饱和度计算中的应用[J].岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(2):120-128. LIU Zhiying, ZHANG Chengguang, TANG Jun, et al. Influence of fracture on rock resistivity and its application in saturation calculation[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(2):120-128.
[19] 刘军,李伟,龚伟,黄超.顺北地区超深断控储层地震识别与描述[J].新疆石油地质, 2021, 42(2):238-245. LIU Jun, LI Wei, GONG Wei, et al. Seismic identification and description of ultra-deep fault-controlled reservoirs in Shunbei area[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2021, 42(2):238-245.
[20] 唐照星,曹自成,汪新文,等.塔里木盆地古城墟隆起鹰山组内幕储层特征及影响因素[J].岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(4):44-49. TANG Zhaoxing, CAO Zicheng, WANG Xinwen, et al. Reservoir characteristics and influencing factors in the inner Yingshan Formation in Guchengxu uplift, Tarim Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2013, 25(4):44-49.
[21] 李宗杰,杨子川,李海英,等.顺北沙漠区超深断溶体油气藏三维地震勘探关键技术[J].石油物探, 2020, 59(2):283-294. LI Zongjie, YANG Zichuan, LI Haiying, et al. Three-dimensional seismic exploration method for ultra-deep fault-related dissolution reservoirs in the Shunbei desert area[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2020, 59(2):283-294.
[22] 刘宝增,漆立新,李宗杰,等.顺北地区超深层断溶体储层空间雕刻及量化描述技术[J].石油学报, 2020, 41(4):412-420. LIU Baozeng, QI Lixin, LI Zongjie, et al. Spatial characterization and quantitative description technology for ultra-deep faultkarst reservoirs in the Shunbei area[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(4):412-420.
[23] 牟建业,李双明,赵鑫,等.基于真实孔隙空间分布的酸蚀蚓孔扩展规律数值模拟研究[J].科学技术与工程, 2014, 14(35):40-46. MOU Jianye, LI Shuangming, ZHAO Xin, et al. Modeling wormhole propataiton behavior based on real pore spatial distributions[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2014, 14(35):40-46.
[24] 齐宁,李柏杨,方明君,等.基于碳酸盐岩酸化溶蚀形态的酸液最优注入速度界限[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 41(5):117-122. QI Ning, LI Boyang, FANG Mingjun, et al. Injection rate optimization for acidizing process of carbonate rocks based on dissolution morphology[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2017, 41(5):117-122.
[25] 张雄,王晓之,郭天魁,等.顺北油田缝内转向压裂暂堵剂评价实验[J].岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5):170-176. ZHANG Xiong, WANG Xiaozhi, GUO Tiankui, et al. Experiment on evaluation of temporary plugging agent for in-fracture steering fracturing in Shunbei Oilfield[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(5):170-176.
[26] 杜鑫,李冬梅,徐燕东,等.井洞相连的缝洞型油藏试井新模型[J].水动力学研究与进展(A辑), 2018, 33(5):552-561. DU Xin, LI Dongmei, XU Yandong, et al. A new analytical well test model for fractured vuggy reservoirs with vug connecting with wellbore[J]. Chinese Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2018, 33(5):552-561.
[1] 易珍丽, 石放, 尹太举, 李斌, 李猛, 刘柳, 王铸坤, 余烨. 塔里木盆地哈拉哈塘—哈得地区中生界物源转换及沉积充填响应[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 56-66.
[2] 黄向胜, 闫琢玉, 张东峰, 黄合庭, 罗程飞. 琼东南盆地Ⅱ号断裂带新生界多期热流体活动与天然气运聚特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 67-76.
[3] 苏皓, 郭艳东, 曹立迎, 喻宸, 崔书岳, 卢婷, 张云, 李俊超. 顺北油田断控缝洞型凝析气藏衰竭式开采特征及保压开采对策[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 178-188.
[4] 孟庆昊, 张昌民, 张祥辉, 朱锐, 向建波. 塔里木盆地现代分支河流体系形态、分布及其主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 44-56.
[5] 程静, 闫建平, 宋东江, 廖茂杰, 郭伟, 丁明海, 罗光东, 刘延梅. 川南长宁地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气储层低电阻率响应特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 31-39.
[6] 西智博, 廖建平, 高荣锦, 周晓龙, 雷文文. 辽河坳陷陈家断裂带北部构造演化解析及油气成藏[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 127-136.
[7] 窦立荣, 刘化清, 李博, 齐雯, 孙东, 尹路, 韩双彪. 全球天然氢气勘探开发利用进展及中国的勘探前景[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 1-14.
[8] 陈叔阳, 何云峰, 王立鑫, 尚浩杰, 杨昕睿, 尹艳树. 塔里木盆地顺北1号断裂带奥陶系碳酸盐岩储层结构表征及三维地质建模[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 124-135.
[9] 杜江民, 崔子豪, 贾志伟, 张毅, 聂万才, 龙鹏宇, 刘泊远. 鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格地区奥陶系马家沟组马五5亚段沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 37-48.
[10] 朱秀香, 赵锐, 赵腾. 塔里木盆地顺北1号断裂带走滑分段特征与控储控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 131-138.
[11] 刘海磊, 朱永才, 刘龙松, 尹鹤, 王学勇, 杜小弟. 准噶尔盆地阜康断裂带上盘二叠系芦草沟组页岩油地质特征及勘探潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(4): 90-101.
[12] 宋兴国, 陈石, 杨明慧, 谢舟, 康鹏飞, 李婷, 陈九洲, 彭梓俊. 塔里木盆地富满油田FⅠ16断裂发育特征及其对油气分布的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 99-109.
[13] 柳忠泉, 赵乐强, 曾治平, 田继军, 李正强, 罗锦昌, 胡美玲. 准噶尔盆地阜康断裂带二叠系芦草沟组页岩油成藏条件[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 126-137.
[14] 倪新锋, 沈安江, 乔占峰, 郑剑锋, 郑兴平, 杨钊. 塔里木盆地奥陶系缝洞型碳酸盐岩岩溶储层成因及勘探启示[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 144-158.
[15] 卢迎波. 超稠油注气次生泡沫油生成机理及渗流特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 152-159.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨秋莲, 李爱琴, 孙燕妮, 崔攀峰. 超低渗储层分类方法探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 51 -56 .
[2] 张杰, 赵玉华. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组地震层序地层研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 71 -74 .
[3] 杨占龙, 张正刚, 陈启林, 郭精义,沙雪梅, 刘文粟. 利用地震信息评价陆相盆地岩性圈闭的关键点分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 57 -63 .
[4] 朱小燕, 李爱琴, 段晓晨, 田随良, 刘美荣. 镇北油田延长组长3 油层组精细地层划分与对比[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 82 -86 .
[5] 方朝合, 王义凤, 郑德温, 葛稚新. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系烃源岩显微组分分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 87 -90 .
[6] 韩春元，赵贤正，金凤鸣，王权，李先平，王素卿. 二连盆地地层岩性油藏“多元控砂—四元成藏—主元富集”与勘探实践（IV）——勘探实践[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 15 -20 .
[7] 戴朝成，郑荣才，文华国，张小兵. 辽东湾盆地旅大地区古近系层序—岩相古地理编图[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 39 -46 .
[8] 尹艳树，张尚峰，尹太举. 钟市油田潜江组含盐层系高分辨率层序地层格架及砂体分布规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 53 -58 .
[9] 石雪峰，杜海峰. 姬塬地区长3—长4+5油层组沉积相研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 59 -63 .
[10] 严世邦，胡望水，李瑞升，关键，李涛，聂晓红. 准噶尔盆地红车断裂带同生逆冲断裂特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 64 -68 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发