岩性油气藏 ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 1–11.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20250201

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    

渤海湾盆地垦利6-1油田新近系明化镇组下段浅水三角洲沉积特征

廖新武, 杨庆红, 李超, 郭诚, 赵大林   

  1. 中海石油(中国)有限公司 天津分公司渤海石油研究院, 天津 300452
  • 收稿日期:2024-09-02 修回日期:2024-10-02 发布日期:2025-03-06
  • 第一作者:廖新武（1972—），男，教授级高级工程师，主要从事油气勘探及开发方面的科研及管理工作。地址：（300452）天津市滨海新区海川路2121号渤海石油管理局大厦B座。Email：liaoxw@cnooc.com.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    中海石油中国有限公司（省部级纵向课题）“渤海水驱稠油油田特高含水期深度挖潜关键技术研究”（编号：KJZH-2024-2204）资助。

Sedimentary characteristics of shallow water delta in the Neogene lower member of Minghuazhen Formation, Kenli 6-1 Oilfield in Bohai Bay Basin

LIAO Xinwu, YANG Qinghong, LI Chao, GUO Cheng, ZHAO Dalin   

  1. Bohai Petroleum Institute, Tianjin Branch of CNOOC Ltd., Tianjin 300452, China
  • Received:2024-09-02 Revised:2024-10-02 Published:2025-03-06

PDF (PC)

113

摘要： 近年来，渤海湾盆地新近系发现了亿吨级储量规模的大油气田。综合利用地质、测井及地震资料，开展了渤海湾盆地垦利6-1油田新近系明化镇组下段浅水三角洲沉积特征及古环境研究。研究结果表明：①渤海湾盆地垦利6-1油田新近系明化镇组下段沉积时期为温带湿润气候，地形平缓，古地形坡度小于1°，平均水深小于6.5 m，物源来自北东方向且供给充足。②研究区储层岩性以岩屑长石砂岩为主，其次为长石砂岩域与长石岩屑砂岩，粒度概率曲线以2段式为主，发育多种反映水动力较强的沉积构造；测井曲线形态以钟形和箱形为主，地震剖面上可见低幅叠瓦状前积特征。③研究区V1小层水下分流河道延伸距离远，宽度窄，整体呈北东—南西向展布，最远延伸距离可达20.10 km，平均长度为10.06 km，水下分流河道砂体宽度为64～420 m，平均宽度为219.65 m，水下分流河道砂体平均厚度约9.42 m。综合沉积微相的平面展布和浅水沉积样式的刻画，研究成果可为油田后期新钻井的部署提供地质依据。

关键词: 浅水三角洲, 水下分流河道, 叠瓦状前积, 古气候, 古水深, 古物源, 明化镇组下段, 垦利6-1油田, 渤海湾盆地

Abstract: In recent years, large oil and gas fields with reserves of billions of tons have been discovered of Neogene in Bohai Bay Basin. A comprehensive study was conducted on the sedimentary characteristics and paleoen-vironment of the shallow water delta in the lower section of the Minghuazhen Formation of the Neogene in the Kenli 6-1 oilfield in the Bohai Bay Basin，utilizing geological，logging，and seismic data. The results show that： （1）The sedimentary period of Minghuazhen Formation in Kenli 6-1 Oilfield in Bohai Bay Basin was characterized by a temperate humid climate，gentle terrain，ancient terrain slope less than 1°，average water depth less than 6.5 m， and abundant supply of sediment from the northeast direction.（2）The reservoir lithology is mainly composed of lithic feldspar sandstone，followed by feldspar sandstone and feldspar lithic sandstone；the probability curve of grain size is mainly in a two-stage form，and various sedimentary structures reflecting strong hydrodynamics are developed；the logging curves are mainly bell shaped and box shaped, and low amplitude tile shaped progradation features can be seen on the seismic profile.（3）The V1 layer underwater distributary channel has a long extension distance and narrow width, and is distributed in northeast-southwest direction as a whole；the farthest extension distance can reach 20.10 km，and the average length is 10.06 km；the width of the underwater distributary channel sand body is between 64 m and 420 m，with an average width of 219.65 m；the average thickness of the underwater distributary channel sand body is about 9.42 m. Based on the comprehensive distribution of sedimentary microfacies，the shallow water sedimentary style of Minghuazhen Formation in Kenli 6-1 Oilfield in Bohai Bay Basin was summarized. The research results provide strong geological basis for new drilling in the later stage of the oilfield，and also provide comparative materials for the exploration and development of other shallow water delta sediments in the Bohai Bay Basin.

Key words: shallow water delta, subaqueous distributary channel, imbricated progradation, palaeoclimate, paleowater depths, paleo-provenance, lower member of Minghuazhen Formation, KL6-1 Oilfield, Bohai Bay Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE121.3+1
[1] FISK H N,MCFARLAN E,HUMBLE J. Sedimentary framework of the modern Mississippi Delta[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology,1954,24(2):76-99.
[2] 袁选俊,周红英,张志杰,等.坳陷湖盆大型浅水三角洲沉积特征与生长模式[J].岩性油气藏,2021,33(1):1-11. YUAN Xuanjun,ZHOU Hongying,ZHANG Zhijie,et al. Depositional features and growth pattern of large shallow-water deltas in depression basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2021,33(1):1-11.
[3] 罗浩渝,陈军,章学岐,等.河控浅水三角洲前缘沉积特征及对岩性油藏的控制:以库车坳陷南斜坡巴西改组为例[J].岩性油气藏,2021,33(5):70-80. LUO Haoyu,CHEN Jun,ZHANG Xueqi,et al. Sedimentary characteristics of fluvial dominated shallow water delta front and its control on lithologic reservoir:A case study of Baxigai Formation in south slope of Kuqa Depression[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2021,33(5):70-80.
[4] 王德英,于海波,王启明,等.渤海海域湖盆萎缩期浅水三角洲岩性油气藏差异成藏模式[J].东北石油大学学报,2018,42(3):16-25. WANG Deying,YU Haibo,WANG Qiming,et al. Differences of hydrocarbon accumulation models of extremely shallow water delta in lacustrine basin shrinking period,Bohai sea[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University,2018,42(3):16-25.
[5] 朱建敏,刘宗宾,宋洪亮,等.渤海湾垦利3油田浅水三角洲单砂体沉积演化模式[J].西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2021,36(5):27-33. ZHU Jianmin,LIU Zongbin,SONG Hongliang,et al. Sedimentary evolution mode of single sandbody in shoal water delta of Kenli 3 Oilfield in Bohai Bay[J]. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University (Natural Science Edition),2021,36(5):27-33.
[6] 秦润森,岳红林,周凤军,等.河控浅水三角洲前缘席状砂沉积特征及沉积模式探讨:以黄河口凹陷渤中34地区明下段为例[J].沉积学报,2020,38(2):429-439. QIN Runsen,YUE Honglin,ZHOU Fengjun,et al. Characteris-tics and sedimentary models of sheet sand in shallow lacustrine Fluvial-dominated delta front:A case study from lower member of Minghuazhen Formation in BZ34 area,Huanghekou Sag[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2020,38(2):429-439.
[7] 付鑫,杜晓峰,官大勇,等.地震沉积学在河流-浅水三角洲沉积相研究中的应用:以渤海海域蓬莱A构造区馆陶组为例[J].地质科技通报,2021,40(3):96-108. FU Xin,DU Xiaofeng,GUAN Dayong,et al. Application of seismic sedimentology in reservoir prediction in fluvial to shal-low water delta facies:A case study in Guantao Formation from the Penglai A structure area in Bohai Bay[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology,2021,40(3):96-108.
[8] 高磊,江涛,王明春,等."富砂型"浅水三角洲储层预测及其油气成藏模式分析:以渤海西部沙垒田凸起明下段为例[J].物探化探计算技术,2018,40(1):27-35. GAO Lei,JIANG Tao,WANG Mingchun,et al. Reservoir prediction of "rich sand" shallow delta and hydrocarbon accumulation pattern analysis:A case of Shaleitian salient lower member of Minghuazhen in the western Bohai sea[J]. Computing Techniques for Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration,2018,40(1):27-35.
[9] 杨帆,邹才能,侯连华,等.坳陷湖盆浅水三角洲沉积特征与油气成藏研究:以饶阳凹陷蠡县斜坡为例[J].特种油气藏, 2012,19(3):26-30. YANG Fan,ZOU Caineng,HOU Lianhua,et al. Sedimentary characteristics and hydrocarbon accumulation in shallow-water delta of depression lake basin:A case study with Lixian slope in Raoyang depression[J]. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs,2012, 19(3):26-30.
[10] 孙和风,周心怀,彭文绪,等.黄河口凹陷新近系浅水三角洲岩性油气藏成藏模式[J].大庆石油学院学报,2010,34(2):11-15. SUN Hefeng,ZHOU Xinhuai,PENG Wenxu,et al. Lithological reservoir forming patterns of Neogene shallow water delta in Huanghekou sag[J]. Journal of Daqing Petroleum Institute,2010, 34(2):11-15.
[11] 王夏斌,姜在兴,胡光义,等.浅水三角洲分流河道沉积模式分类[J].地球科学与环境学报,2020,42(5):654-667. WANG Xiabin,JIANG Zaixing,HU Guangyi,et al. Classification of sedimentary models of distributary channels in shallowwater deltas[J]. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2020, 42(5):654-667.
[12] 赵汉卿,李超,郭诚,等.河控型浅水三角洲前缘河道砂体结构特征:以渤海湾盆地黄河口凹陷BZ34油区明下段Ⅱ油组为例[J].海洋地质前沿,2024,40(2):20-27. ZHAO Hanqing,LI Chao,GUO Cheng,et al. Geomorphology of channel sandbodies in fluvially dominated shallow water delta front:Taking the Lower member of the Minghuazhen Formation in BZ34 Oilfield of the Huanghekou Sag,Bohai Bay Basin as an example[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers,2024,40(2):20-27.
[13] 徐振华,吴胜和,刘钊,等.浅水三角洲前缘指状砂坝构型特征:以渤海湾盆地渤海BZ25油田新近系明化镇组下段为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2019,46(2):322-333. XU Zhenhua,WU Shenghe,LIU Zhao,et al. Sandbody archi-tecture of the bar finger within shoal water delta front:Insights from the Lower member of Minghuazhen Formation,Neogene, Bohai BZ25 Oilfield,Bohai Bay Basin,East China[J]. Petro-leum Exploration and Development,2019,46(2):322-333.
[14] 郭诚.渤海K油田浅水三角洲复合砂体成因刻画[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2018,40(3):52-62. GUO Cheng. Characterizing the genesis of composite sandbodies in the shallow water deltas of K Oilfield in the Bohai Sea[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science&Technology Edition),2018,40(3):52-62.
[15] 赵汉卿,陈晓明,李超,等.渤海湾盆地垦利L油田古近系沙三上段优质储层物性控制因素[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2020,50(2):653-661. ZHAO Hanqin,CHEN Xiaoming,LI Chao. et al. Control factors of high quality reservoir in upper part of the 3 rd member of eocene Shahejie Formation in Kenli L Oilfield,Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2020,50(2):653-661.
[16] 徐长贵,杨海风,王德英,等.渤海海域莱北低凸起新近系大面积高丰度岩性油藏形成条件[J].石油勘探与开发,2021,48(1):12-25. XU Changgui,YANG Haifeng,WANG Deying,et al. Formation conditions of Neogene large-scale high-abundance lithologic reservoir in the Laibei low uplift,Bohai Sea,East China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2021,48(1):12-25.
[17] 李莹莹,岳前升.秦皇岛33-1南油田储层损害因素试验分析[J].长江大学学报(自然科学版),2013,10(20):84-85. LI Yingying,YUE Qiansheng. Experimental study on factors of reservoir damage for QHD33-1 S Oilfield[J]. Journal of Yangtze University (Nature Science Edition),2013,10(20):84-85.
[18] 薛永安,杨海风,徐春强,等.渤海湾盆地垦利6-1亿吨级岩性油田成藏条件及勘探关键技术[J].石油学报,2022,43(2):307-324. XUE Yong'an,YANG Haifeng,XU Chunqiang,et al. Accumulation conditions and key technologies for exploration of Kenli6-1 as the hundred-million-ton-level lithologic oilfield in Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2022,43(2):307-324.
[19] 赵占仑,温小浩,汤连生,等.化学蚀变指数指示古气候变化的适用性探讨[J].沉积学报,2018,36(2):343-353. ZHAO Zhanlun,WEN Xiaohao,TANG Liansheng,et al. Appli-cability of chemical alteration index to indication of paleocli-mate change by different sedimentary facies[J]. Acta Sedimen-tologica Sinica,2018,36(2):343-353.
[20] 冯连君,储雪蕾,张启锐,等.化学蚀变指数(CIA)及其在新元古代碎屑岩中的应用[J].地学前缘,2003,10(4):539-544. FENG Lianjun,CHU Xuelei,ZHANG Qirui,et al. Chemical index of alteration (CIA) and its application in the neoproterozoic clastic rocks[J]. Earth Science Frontiers,2003,10(4):539-544.
[21] NESBITT H W,YOUNG G M. Early Proterozoic climates and plate motions inferred from major element chemistry of lutites[J]. Nature,1982,299:715-717.
[22] 冯乔,张耀,徐子苏,等.胶莱盆地早白垩世瓦屋夼组、水南组元素地球化学特征与古环境分析[J].山东科技大学学报(自然科学版),2018,37(1):20-34. FENG Qiao,ZHANG Yao,XU Zisu,et al. Geochemical charac-teristics and paleoenvironmental analysis of dark fine grained rocks of Wawukuang and Shuinan Formations in Jiaolai Basin[J]. Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology (Natural Science),2018,37(1):20-34.
[23] 邓远,陈轩,覃建华,等.吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组一段沉积期古地貌特征及有利储层分布[J].岩性油气藏,2024,36(1):136-144. DENG Yuan,CHEN Xuan,QIN Jianhua,et al. Paleogeomor-phology and favorable reservoir distribution of the first member of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2024,36(1):136-144.
[24] 吴智平,周瑶琪.一种计算沉积速率的新方法:宇宙尘埃特征元素法[J].沉积学报,2000,18(3):395-399. WU Zhiping,ZHOU Yaoqi. Using the characteristic elements from meteoritic must in strata to calculate sedimentation rate[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2000,18(3):395-399.
[25] 王腾飞,金振奎,楚美娟,等.鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区上三叠统延长组长6油层组沉积环境:来自地球化学的证据[J].古地理学报,2019,21(3):505-516. WANG Tengfei,JIN Zhenkui,CHU Meijuan,et al. Sedimentary environment of the Chang 6 oil-bearing interval of Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation in Jiyuan area,Ordos Basin:Evidences from geochemical data[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography (Chinese Edition),2019,21(3):505-516.
[26] 王天海,许多年,吴涛,等.准噶尔盆地沙湾凹陷三叠系百口泉组沉积相展布特征及沉积模式[J].岩性油气藏,2024,36(1):98-110. WANG Tianhai,XU Duonian,WU Tao. Sedimentary facies distribution characteristics and sedimentary model of Triassic Baikouquan Formation in Shawan Sag,Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2024,36(1):98-110.
[27] 宋传春.地震-地质综合研究方法述评[J].岩性油气藏,2010, 22(2):133-139. SONG Chuanchun. Review of comprehensive study methods for seismics-geology[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2010,22(2):133-139.
[1] 张晓丽, 王小娟, 张航, 陈沁, 关旭, 赵正望, 王昌勇, 谈曜杰. 川东北五宝场地区侏罗系沙溪庙组储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 87-98.
[2] 周洪锋, 吴海红, 杨禹希, 向红英, 高吉宏, 贺昊文, 赵旭. 二连盆地巴音都兰凹陷B51井区白垩系阿四段扇三角洲前缘沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 85-97.
[3] 方旭庆, 钟骑, 张建国, 李军亮, 孟涛, 姜在兴, 赵海波. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷古近系沙三下亚段旋回地层学分析及地层划分[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 19-30.
[4] 冯斌, 黄晓波, 何幼斌, 李华, 罗进雄, 李涛, 周晓光. 渤海湾盆地庙西北地区古近系沙河街组三段源-汇系统重建[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 84-95.
[5] 刘仁静, 陆文明. 断块油藏注采耦合提高采收率机理及矿场实践[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 180-188.
[6] 王亚, 刘宗宾, 路研, 王永平, 刘超. 基于SSOM的流动单元划分方法及生产应用——以渤海湾盆地F油田古近系沙三中亚段湖底浊积水道为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 160-169.
[7] 胡望水, 高飞跃, 李明, 郭志杰, 王世超, 李相明, 李圣明, 揭琼. 渤海湾盆地廊固凹陷古近系沙河街组油藏单元精细表征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 92-99.
[8] 尹艳树, 丁文刚, 安小平, 徐振华. 鄂尔多斯盆地安塞油田塞160井区三叠系长611储层构型表征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(4): 37-49.
[9] 姚秀田, 王超, 闫森, 王明鹏, 李婉. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷新生界断层精细表征及地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(4): 50-60.
[10] 付文俊, 张昌民, 冀东升, 娄林, 刘家乐, 王绪龙. 准噶尔盆地南安集海河剖面中侏罗统头屯河组浅水三角洲沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(4): 145-160.
[11] 曾旭, 卞从胜, 沈瑞, 周可佳, 刘伟, 周素彦, 汪晓鸾. 渤海湾盆地歧口凹陷古近系沙三段页岩油储层非线性渗流特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 40-50.
[12] 杨润泽, 赵贤正, 刘海涛, 李宏军, 赵长毅, 蒲秀刚. 渤海湾盆地黄骅坳陷古生界源内和源下油气成藏特征及有利区预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 110-125.
[13] 姚秀田, 王超, 闫森, 王明鹏, 李婉. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷新近系馆陶组储层敏感性[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 159-168.
[14] 米伟伟, 谢小飞, 曹红霞, 马强, 杜永慧, 张琼, 邓长生, 宋珈萱. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南部二叠系山2—盒8段致密砂岩储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 101-117.
[15] 苏亦晴, 杨威, 金惠, 王志宏, 崔俊峰, 朱秋影, 武雪琼, 白壮壮. 川西北地区三叠系须家河组深层储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(5): 86-99.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发