岩性油气藏 ›› 2019, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (4): 112–120.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20190412

• 勘探技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于叠前OVT域偏移的河道砂体预测方法

周华建   

  1. 中国石油大庆油田有限责任公司 勘探开发研究院, 黑龙江 大庆 163712
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-17 修回日期:2019-04-25 出版日期:2019-07-21 发布日期:2019-06-21
  • 作者简介:周华建(1984-),男,工程师,主要从事油田开发、地震解释与应用方面的研究工作。地址:(163712)黑龙江省大庆市让胡路区科苑路18号大庆油田勘探开发研究院地震解释二室。Email:zhouhuajian@petrochina.com.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重大科技专项"大庆长垣特高含水油田提高采收率示范工程"（编号：2016ZX05054）资助

Prediction method of channel sand body based on prestack migration in OVT domain

ZHOU Huajian   

  1. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Daqing Oilfield Company Ltd., Daqing 163712, Heilongjiang, China
  • Received:2018-12-17 Revised:2019-04-25 Online:2019-07-21 Published:2019-06-21

PDF (PC)

244

摘要： 大庆长垣萨尔图油田萨葡高油层属于陆相大型河流-三角洲沉积，层多层薄，砂泥互层频繁。利用常规叠后地震储层预测方法只能预测部分相对较厚的河道砂体，精度低，井震结合储层描述技术不利于在长垣油田萨葡高油层中全面推广应用。利用萨尔图高密度地震资料的优势，进行叠前地震OVT域的处理，保留了数据体中炮检距和方位角2个参数，以地震沉积学为手段，分析了不同方位地层切片反映储层砂体特征的振幅属性，结合研究区的地貌学特征预测薄互层河道砂体，井震结合储层描述，进一步提高了河道砂体的预测精度，与基于常规地震资料相比，精度提高15%以上。该方法为指导长垣油田井间剩余油描述和挖潜提供了有效手段。

关键词: OVT域, 炮检距, 方位角, 薄互层, 储层预测, 河道砂体

Abstract: The Sapugao reservoir in Saertu oilfield,Daqing Placanticline,is a typical clastic fluvial-delta deposit with thin interbed of sandstone and shale,and frequent sand-mud interbedding. Conventional poststack seismic reservoir prediction method can only predict some relatively thick channel sand bodies with low accuracy,and well-seismic combined with reservoir description technology is not conducive to the comprehensive application of Sapugao reservoir in Placanticline oilfield. Taking advantage of high-density seismic data from Saertu oilfield, the processing of prestack seismic data in OVT domain was carried out,and two parameters of offset and azimuth were retained in the data volume. By means of seismic sedimentology,the amplitude attributes of stratal slices in different directions reflecting the characteristics of reservoir sand bodies were analyzed. The thin interbedded channel sand bodies were predicted according to the geomorphological characteristics of the study area, and the prediction accuracy of channel sand bodies was further improved by combining well and seismic data more than 15%. This method provides an effective means to guide the description and tapping of interwell residual oil in Placanticline oilfield. with reservoir description. Compared with conventional seismic data,the prediction accuracy was improved by more than 15%. This method provides an effective means to guide the description and tapping of interwell residual oil in Placanticline oilfield.

Key words: OVT domain, offset, azimuth angle, thin interbed, reservoir prediction, channel sand body

中图分类号: 

  • P631
[1] 付志国,郑荣才,赵翰卿,等.体积分配原理在河流-三角洲相储层分析中的应用:以大庆长垣萨葡油层为例大庆油田精细储层沉积学研究.成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2006, 33(5):503-508. FU Z G,ZHENG R C,ZHAO H Q,et al. Application of capacity distribution principle in river-delta reservoir analyses:Taking the Daqing Changhuan Sapu oil layer as example. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition),2006, 33(5):503-508.
[2] 刘化清,苏明军,倪长宽,等.薄砂体预测的地震沉积学研究方法.岩性油气藏,2018,30(2):1-11. LIU H Q,SU M J,NI C K,et al. Thin bed prediction from interbeded background:Revised seismic sedimentological method. Lithologic Reservoirs,2018,30(2):1-11.
[3] 蔡志东,李青,王冲,等.利用VSP多波资料预测地层深度及油气属性.岩性油气藏,2019,31(1):106-112. CAI Z D, LI Q,WANG C,et al. Prediction of strata depth and hydrocarbon attributes by using VSP multi-wave data. Lithologic Reservoirs,2019,31(1):106-112.
[4] 刘振峰.油气地震地质模型述评.岩性油气藏,2018,30(1):19-29. LIU Z F. Review on oil and gas seismogeology models. Lithologic Reservoirs,2018,30(1):19-29.
[5] 刘依谋,印兴耀,张三元,等.宽方位地震勘探技术新进展.石油地球物理勘探,2014,49(3):596-610. LIU Y M,YIN X Y,ZHANG S Y,et al. Recent advances in wide azimuth seismic exploration. Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2014, 49(3):596-610.
[6] 詹仕凡,陈茂山,李磊,等.OVT域宽方位叠前地震属性分析方法.石油地球物理勘探,2015,50(5):956-966. ZHAN S F,CHEN M S,LI L,et al. OVT-domain wide azimuth prestack seismic attribute analysis. Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2015,50(5):956-966.
[7] 周鹏,刘志斌,张益明,等.动校剩余时差处理方法及应用.地球物理学进展,2015,30(5):2349-2353. ZHOU P,LIU Z B,ZHANG Y M,et al. The processing method and application of the residual moveout NMO. Progress in Geophysics,2015,30(5):2349-2353.
[8] 丁吉丰,裴江云,包燚."两宽一高"资料处理技术在大庆油田的应用.石油地球物理勘探,2017,52(增刊1):10-16. DING J F,PEI J Y,BAO Y. Application of "Two Widths and One Height" data processing technology in Daqing Oilfield. Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2017,52(Suppl 1):10-16.
[9] 王斌,尹路,陈永波,等.基于OVT域资料的低渗透砂砾岩储集层预测.新疆石油地质,2018,39(1):104-108. WANG B,YIN L,CHEN Y B,et al. OVT Domain-based prediction technology for low-permeability sandy-conglomerate reservoirs. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2018,39(1):104-108.
[10] 王玲,孙廷彬,白静波,等.瞬时频率属性在沉积相研究中的应用:以白音查干凹陷西部腾格尔组为例. 矿物岩石,2012(6):81-85. WANG L,SUN T B,BAI J B,et al. Application of instantaneous frequency to study of sedimentary facies of Tenggeer Formation in Xilinguolai area, Baiyinchagan Sag. Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology,2012(6):81-85.
[11] 娄兵,姚茂敏,罗勇,等.高密度宽方位地震数据处理技术在玛湖凹陷的应用.新疆石油地质,2015,36(2):208-213. LOU B,YAO M M,LUO Y,et al. Application of high density and wide azimuth seismic data processing technology in Mahu Sag,Junggar Basin. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2015,36(2):208-213.
[12] 冯杨伟,屈红军,张功成,等.南海北部琼东南盆地深水区梅山组一段地震相分析.矿物岩石,2016(3):82-95. FENG Y W,QU H J,ZHANG G C,et al. The seismic facies an analyzing of deep water area of Miocene Meishan Formation in Qiongongnan Basin,Northern South China Sea. Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology,2016(3):82-95.
[13] 黄真萍,王晓华,王云专. 薄层地震属性参数分析和厚度预测.石油物探,1997,36(3):28-38. HUANG Z P,WANG X H,WANG Y Z. Parameter analysis of seismic attributes and thickness prediction for thin bed. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum,1997,36(3):28-38.
[14] 卜鸿飞,邢成奎,张云涛.S变换精确分频技术在河流相储层及流体识别中的应用.油气地球物理,2012,10(2):47-50. BU H F,XING C K,ZHANG YT. The application of exact Stransform frequency-division in identification of the fluvial facies reservoir and fluid. Petroleum Geophysics,2012,10(2):47-50.
[15] 曾洪流.地震沉积学在中国:回顾和展望.沉积学报,2011,29(3):417-425. ZENG H L. Seismic sedimentology in China:a review. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2011,29(3):417-425.
[16] 黄饶,刘志斌.叠前同时反演在砂岩油藏预测中的应用.地球物理学进展,2013,28(1):380-386. HUANG R,LIU Z B. Application of prestack simultaneous in version in sandstone oil reservoir prediction. Progress in Geophysics,2013,28(1):380-386.
[17] 李玉凤,孙炜,何巍巍,等.基于叠前反演的泥页岩地层压力预测方法.岩性油气藏,2019,31(1):113-121. LI Y F,SUN W,HE W W,et al. Prediction method of shale formation pressure based on pre-stack inversion. Lithologic Reservoirs,2019,31(1):113-121.
[18] 张义娜,朱筱敏,刘长利.地震沉积学及其在中亚南部地区的应用.石油勘探与开发,2009,36(1):74-79. ZHANG Y N,ZHU X M,LIU C L. Seismic sedimentology and its application in south area of central Asia. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2009,36(1):74-79.
[19] 林承焰,张宪国,董春梅.地震沉积学及其初步应用.石油学报,2007,28(2):69-72. LIN C Y,ZHANG X G,DONG C M. Concept of seismic sedimentology and its preliminary application. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2007,28(2):69-72.
[20] 洪忠,张猛刚,朱筱敏.基于岩石物理的致密碎屑岩气藏岩性及流体概率预测.石油物探,2015,54(6):735-744. HONG Z,ZHANG M G,ZHU X M. Prediction on lithology and fluid probabilities of tight clastic gas reservoir based on rock physics. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum,2015,54(6):735-744.
[21] 苏建龙,屈大鹏,陈超,等.叠前地震反演方法对比分析:礁石坝页岩气藏勘探实例.石油地球物理勘探,2016,51(3):581-588. SU J L,QU D P,CHEN C,et al. Application of pre-stack inversion technique for shale gas in Jiaoshiba gas field. Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2016,51(3):581-588.
[22] 刘力辉,陆蓉,杨文魁.基于深度学习的地震岩相反演方法. 石油物探,2019,58(1):123-128. LIU L H,LU R,YANG W K. Seismic rock inversion method based on depth learning. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2019,58(1):123-128.
[23] 刘茂诚.一个各向异性速度分析应用实例.石油地球物理勘探,2010,45(4):525-529. LIU M C. An application case study for anisotropic velocity analysis. Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2010,45(4):525-529.
[24] 曾洪流,朱筱敏,朱如凯,等. 陆相坳陷型盆地地震沉积学研究规范.石油勘探与开发,2012,39(3):275-284. ZENG H L,ZHU X M,ZHU R K,et al. Guidelines for seismic sedimentologic study in non-marine post-rift basins. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(3):275-284.
[25] 徐立恒,宋宝权,韩嵩,等.变尺度构造模型在地质统计学反演储层预测中的应用.石油学报,2019,40(2):190-196. XU L H,SONG B Q,HAN S,et al. Application of variable scale structural model in geostatistical inversion for reservoir prediction. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(2):190-196.
[26] 郎晓玲,彭仕宓,康洪全,等.利用多属性体分类技术预测扇三角洲砂体.西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2010,32(1):57-62. LANG X L,PENG S M,KANG H Q,et al. Predict fan delta and body by using multi-attributes volume classification technology. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition),2010,32(1):57-62.
[27] 孙鲁平,郑晓东,首皓,等.薄层地震峰值频率与厚度关系研究.石油地球物理勘探,2010,45(2):254-259. SUN L P,ZHENG X D,SHOU H,et al. The studies on relationship between thin layer seismic peak frequency and its thick ness. Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2010,45(2):254-259.
[28] 王伟,吴奎,何京,等.锦州25-1油田优质储层地震响应特征与定量预测.岩性油气藏,2018,30(3):100-111. WANG W,WU K,HE J,et al. Seismic response characteristics and quantitative prediction of high quality reservoirs in Jinzhou 25-1 oilfield. Lithologic Reservoirs,2018,30(3):100-111.
[29] 刘文岭,王大星,萧希航,等.复杂油藏井震联合等时地层对比技术与应用.石油物探,2016,55(4):540-548. LIU W L,WANG D X,XIAO X H,et al. Combined well-seismic isochronal stratigraphic correlation technology and its application in complex reservoirs. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2016,55(4):540-548.
[30] 李莉.江陵凹陷南斜坡新沟嘴组下段薄互层滩坝砂储层预测技术.海洋地质前沿,2016,32(12):46-53. LI L. Prediction technique for interbeded thin reservoir of beach bar facies on southern slope of Jiangling. Marine Geology Frontier,2016,32(12):46-53.
[1] 张闻亭, 龙礼文, 肖文华, 魏浩元, 李铁锋, 董震宇. 酒泉盆地青西凹陷窟窿山构造带下沟组沉积特征及储层预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 186-197.
[2] 孙夕平, 张昕, 李璇, 韩永科, 王春明, 魏军, 胡英, 徐光成, 张明, 戴晓峰. 基于叠前深度偏移的基岩潜山风化淋滤带储层预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 220-228.
[3] 曹思佳, 孙增玖, 党虎强, 曹帅, 刘冬民, 胡少华. 致密油薄砂体储层预测技术及应用实效——以松辽盆地敖南区块下白垩统泉头组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 239-247.
[4] 吴青鹏, 吕锡敏, 陈娟, 周在华, 袁成. 酒泉盆地营尔凹陷下白垩统下沟组沉积特征及勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5): 54-62.
[5] 童强, 余建国, 田云吉, 胡克来, 杨红梅, 程旭明, 朱玉双. 演武油田Y116井区延8段构型界面约束下的单河道砂体构型[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3): 144-158.
[6] 张家强, 李士祥, 周新平, 梁益财, 郭睿良, 闫灿灿, 陈俊霖, 李树同. 志丹地区长82砂层组缓坡浅水三角洲前缘砂体发育模式及成因[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(1): 36-50.
[7] 罗泽, 谢明英, 涂志勇, 卫喜辉, 陈一鸣. 一套针对高泥质疏松砂岩薄储层的识别技术——以珠江口盆地X油田为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(6): 95-101.
[8] 刘恭利, 韩自军, 段新意, 甄宗玉. 薄互层火成岩地震响应特征及厚度预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(3): 105-112.
[9] 刘丽. 埕岛油田馆陶组曲流河砂体叠置模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(1): 40-48.
[10] 张建坤, 吴鑫, 方度, 王方鲁, 高文中, 陈小军. 马头营凸起馆二段窄薄河道砂体地震识别[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(6): 89-97.
[11] 杨兆平, 岳世俊, 郑长龙, 刘雄志, 陈更新. 薄互层砂岩油藏多因素综合约束的产量劈分方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(6): 117-124.
[12] 石战战, 王元君, 唐湘蓉, 庞溯, 池跃龙. 一种基于时频域波形分类的储层预测方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(4): 98-104.
[13] 刘化清, 苏明军, 倪长宽, 洪忠, 崔向丽, 胡凯峰, 李政阳, 毛俊丽. 薄砂体预测的地震沉积学研究方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(2): 1-11.
[14] 章惠, 关达, 向雪梅, 陈勇. 川东北元坝东部须四段裂缝型致密砂岩储层预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(1): 133-139.
[15] 段友祥, 曹婧, 孙歧峰. 自适应倾角导向技术在断层识别中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(4): 101-107.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 庞雄奇, 陈冬霞, 张　俊. 隐蔽油气藏的概念与分类及其在实际应用中需要注意的问题[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 1 -8 .
[2] 雷卞军，张吉，王彩丽，王晓蓉，李世临，刘斌. 高分辨率层序地层对微相和储层的控制作者用——以靖边气田统5井区马五段上部为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 1 -7 .
[3] 杨杰，卫平生，李相博. 石油地震地质学的基本概念、内容和研究方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 1 -6 .
[4] 王延奇，胡明毅，刘富艳，王辉，胡治华. 鄂西利川见天坝长兴组海绵礁岩石类型及礁体演化阶段[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(3): 44 -48 .
[5] 代黎明, 李建平, 周心怀, 崔忠国, 程建春. 渤海海域新近系浅水三角洲沉积体系分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 75 -81 .
[6] 段友祥, 曹婧, 孙歧峰. 自适应倾角导向技术在断层识别中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(4): 101 -107 .
[7] 黄龙，田景春，肖玲，王峰. 鄂尔多斯盆地富县地区长6砂岩储层特征及评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 83 -88 .
[8] 杨仕维，李建明. 震积岩特征综述及地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 89 -94 .
[9] 李传亮，涂兴万. 储层岩石的2种应力敏感机制——应力敏感有利于驱油[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 111 -113 .
[10] 李君, 黄志龙, 李佳, 柳波. 松辽盆地东南隆起区长期隆升背景下的油气成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 57 -61 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发