岩性油气藏 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (6): 145–155.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20210615

• 勘探技术 • 上一篇    

基于OVT域偏移数据的云质岩储层预测技术及应用——以玛湖凹陷乌夏地区风三段为例

陈永波1, 张虎权1, 张寒1, 曾华会1, 王斌1, 王洪求1, 许多年1, 马永平1, 宗兆云2   

  1. 1. 中国石油勘探开发研究院 西北分院, 兰州 730020;
    2. 中国石油大学 (华东)地球科学与技术学院, 山东 青岛 266555
  • 收稿日期:2021-01-25 修回日期:2021-06-18 发布日期:2021-11-25
  • 作者简介:陈永波(1966-),男,高级工程师,主要从事地震资料解释和油藏描述研究工作。地址:(730020)甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号。Email:chenyb@petrochina.com.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技重大专项“岩性地层油气藏成藏规律、关键技术及目标评价”（编号：2017zx05001-003）资助

Dolomitic reservoir prediction technology based on OVT domain migration data and its application: A case study of Feng 3 member in Wuxia area,Mahu Sag

CHEN Yongbo1, ZHANG Huquan1, ZHANG Han1, ZENG Huahui1, WANG Bin1, WANG Hongqiu1, XU Duonian1, MA Yongping1, ZONG Zhaoyun2   

  1. 1. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development-Northwest, Lanzhou 730020, China;
    2. School of Geoscience, China University of Petroleum(East China), Qingdao 266555, Shandong, China
  • Received:2021-01-25 Revised:2021-06-18 Published:2021-11-25

PDF (PC)

182

摘要： 由于乌夏地区二叠系风城组风三段湖相云质岩“甜点”储层单层厚度小、横向变化快、与围岩的波阻抗差异较小等特点，使用常规三维资料预测“甜点”分布难度大。对高产井的云质岩“甜点”储层油气富集主控藏因素分析认为，“甜点”发育区主要受控于储层厚度大、脆性（裂缝）发育区及高压区的叠合部位。以油气主控因素为切入点，采用在地质目标驱动下基于炮检距-方位角叠加模板的道集动态分析与叠加的方法，形成不同方位角的叠前偏移地震数据用于预测云质岩储层厚度；基于弹性参数交会分析模板，利用杨氏模量（E）与泊松比（σ）的比值增大来预测斜坡区云质岩储层脆性发育区；从波动方程、胡克定律和弹性参数的定义出发推导出有效应力与纵、横波速度之间的关系，研发出了一种新的弹性参数杨氏模量（E）和体积模量（K）加权法，用于预测异常压力区，从而提高了“甜点”储层在平面上的预测精度。利用此项研究成果，部署钻探了3口探井均在风三段获得高产油流，预测石油地质储量亿吨级，并指出下一步斜坡区的勘探方向为FC1井西南方向云质岩“甜点”储层发育区。

关键词: OVT域, 云质岩储层, 叠前脆性预测, 异常压力预测, 风城组, 玛湖凹陷

Abstract: The lacustrine dolomitic reservoir “sweet spots” of Feng 3 member of Permian Fengcheng Formation in Wuxia area have the characteristics of single thin layer, rapid lateral change and small impedance differences from surrounding rocks, so it is difficult to predict the “sweet spots” reservoir by using conventional 3D seismic data. Based on the analysis of main controlling factors of oil enrichment in the dolomitic reservoir “sweet spots” in high yield wells, it is found that the “sweet spots” are mostly in places where the reservoirs have large thickness, high brittleness(fractures) and high pressure. Based on the main controlling factors of oil accumulation, trace gather dynamic analysis and stacking method based on offset-azimuth stacking template under geologic target was worked out to get prestack seismic data of different azimuths to predict the thickness of dolomitic reservoir. On the basis of elastic parameter cross-plot analysis template, Young's modulus(E) and Poisson's ratio(σ) were used to predict the brittle part of dolomitic reservoir in the slope area. Based on wave equation, Hooke's law and elastic parameter, the relationships of effective stress with P-wave and S-wave velocity were derived, and a formation pressure prediction method combining Young's modulus(E) and volume modulus(K) was developed to predict the area with abnormal pressure to enhance the prediction accuracy of “sweet spots”. After the application of this result, three wells have obtained high yield oil flows in Feng 3 member, and hundred million tons geologic oil reserves are evaluated.

Key words: OVT-domain, dolomitic reservoir, brittleness from pre-stack inversion, prediction of abnormal pressure, Fengcheng Formation, Mahu Sag

中图分类号: 

  • P631.4
[1] 张国印, 王志章, 郭旭光, 等. 准噶尔盆地乌夏地区风城组云质岩致密油特征及"甜点"预测. 石油与天然气地质, 2015, 36(2):219-229. ZHANG G Y, WANG Z Z, GUO X G, et al. Characteristics and "sweet spot" prediction of dolomitic tight oil reservoirs of the Fengcheng Formation in Wuxia area, Junggar Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 2015, 36(2):219-229.
[2] 丁吉丰, 裴江云, 包燄, 等. "两宽一高"资料处理技术在大庆油田的应用. 石油地球物理勘探, 2017, 52(增刊1):10-17. DING J F, PEI J Y, BAO Y, et al. Application of "two wides and one height" data processing technology in Daqing Oilfield. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2017, 52(Suppl 1):10-17.
[3] 李红星. 一种基于OVT域的地震储层预测方法. 特种油气藏, 2019, 26(4):52-57. LI H X. A Seismic reservoir prediction based on OVT domain. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs, 2019, 26(4):52-57.
[4] 夏亚良, 魏小东, 王中凡, 等. OVT域方位各向异性技术在中非花岗岩裂缝预测中的应用研究. 石油物探, 2018, 57(1):140-147. XIA Y L, WEI X D, WANG Z F, et al. Application of azimuthally anisotropy by OVT gather for granite fracture prediction in Central Africa. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2018, 57(1):140-147.
[5] 周华建. 基于叠前OVT域偏移的河道砂体预测方法. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(4):112-120. ZHOU H J. Prediction method of channel sand body based on prestack migration in OVT domain. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(4):112-120.
[6] 龙隆, 陈康, 冉崎, 等. 基于OVT域数据各向异性处理的缝洞预测方法:以四川盆地云锦向斜茅口组为例. 天然气勘探与开发, 2020, 43(2):23-29. LONG L, CHEN K, RAN Q, et al. A method to predict fracture and vug based on OVT-domain data anisotropy processing:An example from Maokou Formation, Yunjin syncline, Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2020, 43(2):23-29.
[7] 陈磊, 丁靖, 潘伟卿, 等. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷西斜坡二叠系风城组云质岩优质储层特征及控制因素. 中国石油勘探, 2012, 17(3):8-11. CHEN L, DING J, PAN W Q, et al. Characteristics and controlling factors of high-quality dolomite reservoir in Permian Fengcheng Formation in west slope of Mahu Sag,Junggar Basin. China Petroleum Exploration, 2012, 17(3):8-11.
[8] 黄成刚, 袁剑英, 吴梁宇, 等. 湖相白云岩成因模式及研究方法探讨. 岩性油气藏, 2016,28(2):7-15. HUANG C G, YUAN J Y, WU L Y, et al. Origin and research methods of lacustrine dolomite. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(2):7-15.
[9] 匡立春, 唐勇, 雷德文, 等. 准噶尔盆地二叠系咸化湖相云质岩致密油形成条件与勘探潜力. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(6):657-667. KUANG L C, TANG Y, LEI D W, et al. Formation conditions and exploration potential of tight oil in the Permian saline lacustrine dolomitic rock Junggar Basin. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(6):657-667.
[10] 刘英辉, 朱筱敏, 朱茂, 等. 准噶尔盆地乌-夏地区二叠系风城组致密油储层特征. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(4):66-72. LIU Y H, ZHU X M, ZHU M, et al. Characteristics of tight oil reservoirs of the Permian Fengcheng Formation in Wu-Xia area, Junggar Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2014, 26(4):66-72.
[11] 李庆辉,陈勉, Fred P-Wang, 等. 工程因素对页岩气产量的影响:以北美Haynesville页岩气藏为例. 天然气工业, 2012, 32(4):54-59. LI Q H, CHEN M, WANG F P, et al. Influences of engineering factors on shale gas productivity:A case study from the Haynesville shale gas reservoir in North America. Natural Gas Industry, 2012, 32(4):54-59.
[12] 申海萌, 李琦, 李霞颖, 等. 川南龙马溪组页岩不同应力条件下脆性破坏特征室内实验与数值模拟研究. 岩土力学, 2018, 9(增刊2):254-262. SHEN H M, LI Q, LI X Y, et al. Laboratory experiment and numerical simulation on brittle failure characteristics of Longmaxi Formation shale in southern Sichuan under different stress conditions. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 9(Suppl 2):254-262.
[13] 张杰, 何周, 徐怀宝, 等. 乌尔禾-风城地区二叠系白云质岩类岩石学特征及成因分析. 沉积学报, 2012, 30(5):859-867. ZHANG J, HE Z, XU H B, et al. Petrological characteristics and origin of Permian Fengcheng Formation dolomitic rocks in WuerheFengcheng area, Junggar Basin. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2012, 30(5):859-867.
[14] 潘晓添, 郑荣才, 文华国, 等. 准噶尔盆地乌尔禾地区风城组云质致密油储层特征. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 40(3):315-325. PAN X T, ZHENG R C, WENG H G, et al. Tight oil reservoir of Permian Fengcheng Formation in Urho area,Junggar Basin, China. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition), 2013, 40(3):315-325.
[15] 高岗, 黄志龙, 王兆峰, 等. 地层异常高压形成机理的研究. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 20(1):1-7. GAO G, HUANG Z L, WANG Z F, et al. Study on the mechanisms of the formation of formation abnormal high-pressure. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition), 2005, 20(1):1-7.
[16] 印兴耀, 张洪学, 宗兆云. OVT数据域五维地震资料解释技术研究现状与进展. 石油物探, 2018, 57(2):155-178. YIN X Y, ZHANG H X, ZONG Z Y. Research status and progress of 5D seismic data Interpretation in OVT domain. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2018, 57(2):155-178.
[17] 段文胜. 宽方位地震资料OVT处理技术. 北京:东方出版社, 2016. DUAN W S. OVT processing technology for wide azimuth seismic data. Beijing:Oriental Press, 2016.
[18] 詹仕凡, 陈茂山, 李磊, 等. OVT域宽方位叠前地震属性分析方法. 石油地球物理勘探, 2015, 50(5):956-966. ZHAN S F, CHEN M S, LI L, et al. Analysis method of wide azimuth prestack seismic attributes in OVT domain. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2015, 50(5):956-966.
[19] 龚明平, 张军华, 王延光, 等. 分方位地震勘探研究现状及进展. 石油地球物理勘探, 2018, 53(3):642-658. GONG M P, ZHANG J H, WANG Y G, et al. Present situation and progress of azimuth seismic exploration. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2018, 53(3):642-658.
[20] 孟阳, 许颖玉, 李静叶, 等. OVT域地震资料属性分析技术在断裂精细识别中的应用. 石油地球物理勘探, 2018, 53(增刊2):289-294. MENG Y, XU Y Y, LI J Y, et al. Fault identification with OVT domain seismic attribute analysis. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2018, 53(Suppl 2):289-294.
[21] 刘勇, 方伍宝, 李振春, 等. 基于叠前地震的脆性预测方法及应用研究. 石油物探, 2016, 55(3):425-432. LIU Y, FANG W B, LI Z C, et al. Brittleness prediction and application based on pre-stack seismic inversion. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2016, 55(3):425-432.
[22] 李金磊, 李文成. 涪陵页岩气田焦石坝区块页岩脆性指数地震定量预测. 天然气工业, 2017, 30(7):13-19. LI J L, LI W C. A quantitative seismic prediction technique for the brittleness index of shale in the Jiaoshiba block,Fuling shale gas field in the Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Industry, 2017, 30(7):13-19.
[23] 宗兆云, 印兴耀, 张峰, 等. 杨氏模量和泊松比反射系数近似方程及叠前地震反演. 地球物理学报, 2012, 55(11):3786-3794. ZONG Z Y, YIN X Y, ZHANG F, et al. Reflection coefficient equation and prestack seimic inversion of Young's modulus and Poisson's. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2012, 55(11):3786-3794.
[24] 张军舵, 谢天峰, 王恩利. GeoFrac特色技术在滨里海裂缝储层预测中的应用. 天津:物探技术研讨会, 2017. ZHANG J D, XIE T F, WANG E L. Application of GeoFrac characteristic technique in prediction of fractured reservoirs in littoral Caspian sea. Tianjin:Geophysical Exploration Technology Seminar, 2017.
[25] 王勇, 龙凡, 杨建礼, 等. 叠前反演在龙虎泡致密油"工程甜点"预测中的应用. 石油物探, 2020, 59(1):114-121. WANG Y, LONG F, YANG J L, et al. Prestack elastic inversion for "geomechanical sweet-spot" prediction in Longhupao region of Songliao Basin,China. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2020, 59(1):114-121.
[26] 王维红, 林春华, 王建民, 等. 叠前弹性参数反演方法及其应用. 石油物探, 2009, 48(5):483-492. WANG W H, LIN C H, WANG J M, et al. Pre-stack elastic parameters inversion and its application. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2009, 48(5):483-492.
[27] 张林清, 张会星, 姜效典, 等. 弹性参数反演与属性融合技术在"甜点"预测中的应用.天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(4):582-589. ZHANG L Q, ZHANG H X, JIANG X D, et al. Application of elastic parameters inversion and attribute fusion technology in the "sweet spot" prediction. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2017, 28(4):582-589.
[28] 王斌, 雍学善, 潘建国, 等. 纵横波速度联合预测地层压力的方法及应用. 天然气地球科学, 2105, 26(2):367-370. WANG B, YONG X S, PAN J G, et al. Methods and application of the formation pressure forecast combining Vp and Vs. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015, 26(2):367-370.
[29] 李玉凤, 孙炜, 何巍巍, 等. 基于叠前反演的泥页岩地层压力预测方法. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(1):113-121. LI Y F, SUN W, HE W W, et al. Prediction method of shale formation pressure based on pre-stack inversion. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(1):113-121.
[30] 刘洋. 基于相控神经网络的地震多属性储层厚度预测. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 45(2):221-228.. LIU Y. Study on the reservoir thickness prediction by seismic multiattributes based on facies-guided neural network. Journal of Chengdu University of technology(Science Technology Edition), 2018, 45(2):221-228.
[31] 刘敏, 张顺存, 史基安, 等. 准噶尔盆地西北缘风城地区二叠系风城组沉积相研究. 新疆地质, 2013, 31(3):236-242. LIU M, ZHANG S C, SHI J A,et al. The sedimentary faces research of Fengcheng Formation of Permian in Fengcheng area, the northwestern margin of Junggar Basin. Xinjiang Geology, 2013, 31(3):236-242.
[1] 杜猛, 向勇, 贾宁洪, 吕伟峰, 张景, 张代燕. 玛湖凹陷百口泉组致密砂砾岩储层孔隙结构特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(5): 120-131.
[2] 毛锐, 牟立伟, 王刚, 樊海涛. 基于核磁共振自由弛豫特征的含油性评价方法——以玛湖凹陷下乌尔禾组砾岩储层为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(5): 140-147.
[3] 马永平, 张献文, 朱卡, 王国栋, 潘树新, 黄林军, 张寒, 关新. 玛湖凹陷二叠系上乌尔禾组扇三角洲沉积特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 57-70.
[4] 陈静, 陈军, 李卉, 努尔艾力·扎曼. 准噶尔盆地玛中地区二叠系—三叠系叠合成藏特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 71-80.
[5] 雷海艳, 樊顺, 鲜本忠, 孟颖, 杨红霞, 晏奇, 齐婧. 玛湖凹陷二叠系下乌尔禾组沸石成因及溶蚀机制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5): 102-112.
[6] 胡潇, 曲永强, 胡素云, 潘建国, 尹路, 许多年, 滕团余, 王斌. 玛湖凹陷斜坡区浅层油气地质条件及勘探潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 67-77.
[7] 周华建. 基于叠前OVT域偏移的河道砂体预测方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(4): 112-120.
[8] 况晏, 司马立强, 瞿建华, 温丹妮, 陈猛, 吴丰. 致密砂砾岩储层孔隙结构影响因素及定量评价——以玛湖凹陷玛131井区三叠系百口泉组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(4): 91-100.
[9] 李 兴，张立强，施 辉，郑一丁 . 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷百口泉组沉积古环境分析——— 以玛 18 井为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(2): 80-85.
[10] 庞德新. 砂砾岩储层成因差异及其对储集物性的控制效应----以玛湖凹陷玛 2 井区下乌尔禾组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(5): 149-154.
[11] 张有平，盛世锋，高祥录. 玛湖凹陷玛 2 井区下乌尔禾组扇三角洲沉积及有利储层分布[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(5): 204-210.
[12] 傅 饶, 郑荣才, 常海亮, 祁利祺, 文华国, 李 云. 湖相“白烟型”喷流岩——新型的致密油储层类型—— — 以准噶尔盆地西缘乌尔禾地区风城组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(3): 32-42.
[13] 刘英辉，朱筱敏，朱茂，廖宗宝，王小军，王俊怀. 准噶尔盆地乌—夏地区二叠系风城组致密油储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(4): 66-72.
[14] 宫博识，文华国，李丛林，王亮，郑荣才，祁利祺. 准噶尔盆地乌尔禾地区风城组沉积环境分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(2): 59-66.
[15] 殷建国，丁超， 辜清，王仲军，王贵文，史基安. 准噶尔盆地西北缘乌风地区风城组白云质岩类储层特征及控制因素分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(5): 83-88.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发