岩性油气藏 ›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1): 144–151.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20200116

• 油气田开发 • 上一篇    下一篇

X油田特低渗透油藏井网加密效果预测方法

张意超1, 陈民锋1,2, 屈丹1, 毛梅芬1, 杨子由1   

  1. 1. 中国石油大学(北京)石油工程学院, 北京 102249;
    2. 中国石油大学(北京)油气资源与探测国家重点实验室, 北京 102249
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-20 修回日期:2019-08-15 出版日期:2020-01-21 发布日期:2019-11-22
  • 通讯作者: 陈民锋(1971-),男,博士,副教授,主要从事油田开发和提高采收率方面的研究与教学工作。Email:cmfllp96@126.com。 E-mail:cmfllp96@126.com
  • 作者简介:张意超(1996-),男,中国石油大学(北京)在读硕士研究生,研究方向为油田开发系统理论方法。地址:(102249)北京市昌平区府学路18号中国石油大学。Email:18810061301@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    中海石油(中国)有限公司综合科研项目“渤海双高油田挖潜关键技术研究”(编号:YXKY-2018-TJ-04)和国家科技重大专项课题“油气资产价值评估及投资优化组合技术”子课题“油气资产价值评估体系研究”(编号:2016ZX05033005-007)联合资助

Prediction method of well pattern infilling effect for ultra-low permeability reservoir in X oilfield

ZHANG Yichao1, CHEN Minfeng1,2, QU Dan1, MAO Meifen1, YANG Ziyou1   

  1. 1. College of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China;
    2. State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
  • Received:2019-05-20 Revised:2019-08-15 Online:2020-01-21 Published:2019-11-22

摘要: 基于实际油藏井网加密调整后的动态开展效果预测研究,可为油田开发规划提供调整依据。通过对X油田特低渗透油藏井网加密调整前后开发动态变化分析,确定了加密增产效果变化规律及其主要影响因素;基于建立的反映实际油藏特点的典型数值模型,应用响应面设计方法和逐步回归方法,综合研究了不同因素变化对井网加密后增产效果的影响,并得到了反映特低渗透油藏特点的、考虑多因素影响的井网加密调整增产效果预测模型。预测模型在X油田特低渗透油藏中的实际应用表明,预测精度较高,并具有很强的针对性和实用性。本文建立的以“增产倍数”来表征油藏加密调整后的增产效果的方法,可为特低渗透油藏加密调整效果预测提供参考,并为此类油藏的开发规划提供可靠依据。

关键词: 特低渗透油藏, 井网加密, 反九点法, 增产效果, 响应面设计, 预测模型

Abstract: The dynamic development effect prediction research based on actual reservoir well pattern infilling adjustment can provide adjustment basis for oilfield development planning. Based on the dynamic analysis of the development before and after well pattern infilling adjustment for ultra-low permeability reservoir in X-oilfield, the change law of infilling yield-increasing effect and its main influencing factors were determined. Based on the typical numerical model established to reflect the characteristics of actual reservoir,the response surface design method and stepwise regression method were applied to comprehensively study the impact of different factors on the yield-increasing effect after well patter infilling,and the prediction model of yield-increasing effect of well pattern infilling adjustment considering multi-factors and reflecting the characteristics of ultra-low permeability reservoirs was obtained. The practical application of the prediction model for the ultra-low permeability reservoir in X oilfield shows that the prediction accuracy is high,and it has strong pertinence and practicability. The method established to characterize the yield-increasing effect of infilling adjustment can provide reference for the prediction of infilling adjustment effect of ultra-low permeability reservoirs,and provide a reliable basis for the development planning of such reservoirs.

Key words: ultra-low permeability reservoir, well pattern infilling, inverted nine-spot method, yield-increasing effect, response surface design, prediction model

中图分类号: 

  • TE33+1.1
[1] 聂光华, 高纯福.油藏数值模拟在油田开发调整中的应用:八面河油田面4区面3块开发调整方案研究.石油天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报), 2006, 28(4):324-326. NIE G H, GAO C F. Application of reservoir numerical simulation in oilfield development and adjustment:Study on the development and adjustment plan of the block 4 area of the Bamianhe Oilfield. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology(Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute), 2006, 28(4):324-326.
[2] 于天忠.水平井化学驱物理模拟及数值模拟研究.岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(5):104-108. YU T Z. Study on physical simulation and numerical simulation of chemical flooding in horizontal wells. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2013, 25(5):104-108.
[3] 张运来, 廖新武, 胡勇, 等. 海上稠油油田高含水期开发模式研究. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(4):120-126. ZHANG Y L, LIAO X W, HU Y, et al. Development models for offshore heavy oil field in high water cut stage. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(4):120-126.
[4] 李淑霞, 盖英杰, 张俨彬. 油藏数值模拟效果的定量评价方法.石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2001, 25(6):58-60. LI S X, GAI Y J, ZHANG Y B. Quantitative evaluation method for numerical simulation effects of reservoirs. Journal of the University of Petroleum, China(Natural Science Edition), 2001, 25(6):58-60.
[5] 周游, 李治平, 景成, 等. 基于"岩石物理相-流动单元" 测井响应定量评价特低渗透油藏优质储层:以延长油田东部油区长6油层组为例. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(1):116-123. ZHOU Y, LI Z P, JING C, et al. Quantitative evaluation of favorable reservoir in ultra-low permeable reservoir based on "petrophysical facies-flow unit" log response:a case study of Chang 6 oil reservoir set in Yanchang Oilfield. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(1):116-123.
[6] 沈瑞, 李兆国, 段宝江, 等.王窑油田西部低渗透油藏正方形反九点井网加密调整物理模拟.油气地质与采收率, 2014, 21(3):89-91. SHEN R, LI Z G, DUAN B J, et al. Physical simulation of square anti-nine point well network in low permeability reservoirs in western Wangyao Oilfield. Petroleum Geology and Recovery, 2014, 21(3):89-91.
[7] 向泽均, 李书静, 李新春, 等.长庆油田加密调整提高采收率技术.中国石油石化, 2017(3):43-44. XIANG Z J, LI S J, LI X C, et al. Encryption adjustment and enhanced oil recovery technology in Changqing Oilfield. China Petroleum & Petrochemical Corporation, 2017(3):43-44.
[8] 毕岐.安塞油田王窑井网加密区水驱规律及改善开发效果研究.西安:西北大学, 2013. BI Q. Study on water flooding law and improvement effect of encryption area of Wangyao well in Ansai Oilfield. Xi'an:Northwest University, 2013.
[9] 常广涛. 长庆特低渗油藏典型区块水驱波及规律研究.北京:中国石油大学, 2017. CHANG G T. Study on the law of water flooding in typical blocks of Changqing ultra-low permeability reservoir. Beijing:China University of Petroleum, 2017.
[10] 胡建国, 陈元千.预测油气田产量的简单模型.中国海上油气(地质), 1995, 9(1):53-59. HU J G, CHEN Y Q. A simple model for predicting oil and gas field production. China Offshore Oil and Gas(Geology), 1995, 9(1):53-59.
[11] 王俊魁, 李发印.预测油气田产量的一种新模型.新疆石油地质, 2001, 22(1):48-52. WANG J K, LI F Y. A new model for predicting oil and gas field production. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2001, 22(1):48-52.
[12] 黄全华, 付云辉, 陆云, 等.应用改进无偏灰色模型预测油气田产量.岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(5):117-122. HUANG Q H, FU Y H, LU Y, et al. Application of improved unbiased grey model to predict oil and gas field production. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(5):117-122.
[13] 刘传喜, 王树平, 刘延庆.油气田产量预测模型应用新方法. 石油与天然气地质, 2009, 30(3):384-387. LIU C X, WANG S P, LIU Y Q. Application of new method for oil and gas field production prediction model. Oil & Gas Geology, 2009, 30(3):384-387.
[14] 金拴联, 蒋远征, 杨秋莲, 等.安塞油田注水开发技术研究.西北地质, 2008, 41(1):115-120. JIN S L, JIANG Y Z, YANG Q L, et al. Water injection development technology research in Ansai Oilfield. Northwest Geology, 2008, 41(1):115-120.
[15] 靳星, 姬智贤, 关冲, 等.安塞油田长6储层四性关系及有效厚度下限研究.内蒙古石油化工, 2018(3):109-112. JIN X, JI Z X, GUAN C, et al. Study on the four-sex relationship and the effective thickness lower limit of the Chang 6 reservoir in Ansai Oilfield. Inner Mongolia Petrochemical, 2018(3):109-112.
[16] 韩星.安塞油田H区延长组长4+5、长6油层组沉积相展布及石油聚集规律.国外测井技术, 2019, 40(3):50-56. HAN X. Sedimentary facies distribution and oil accumulation regularity of Chang 4+5 and Chang 6 oil-bearing formations in the Yanchang Formation of Ansai Oilfield. Foreign Well Logging Technology, 2019, 40(3):50-56.
[17] 王磊.长庆油田王窑南地区延安组储层研究.大庆:东北石油大学, 2015. WANG L. Reservoir study of Yan'an Formation in Wangyao south area,Changqing Oilfield. Daqing:Northeast Petroleum University, 2015.
[18] 罗宪波, 李金宜.基于响应面设计方法的海上油田注聚段塞优化研究. 重庆科技学院学报(自然科学版), 2016, 18(6):49-52. LUO X B, LI J Y. Based on the response surface design method for the optimization of the offshore oilfield segmentation stage, Journal of Chongqing University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2016, 18(6):49-52.
[19] 耿站立, 姜汉桥, 李杰, 等.正交试验设计法在优化注聚参数研究中的应用.西南石油大学学报, 2007, 29(5):119-121. GENG Z L, JIANG H Q, LI J, et al. Application of orthogonal experimental design method in the study of optimization of injection parameters. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University, 2007, 29(5):119-121.
[20] 游士兵, 严研.逐步回归分析法及其应用.统计与决策, 2017(14):31-35. YOU S B, YAN Y. Stepwise regression analysis and its application. Statistics and Decision, 2017(14):31-35
[21] 付云, 尹洪超, 段林林, 等.基于逐步回归分析的海上原油反相点预测方法研究. 广东石油化工学院学报, 2012, 22(6):69-72. FU Y, YIN H C, DUAN L L, et al. Research on prediction method of reverse point of offshore oil based on stepwise regression analysis. Journal of Guangdong Institute of Petrochemical Technology, 2012, 22(6):69-72.
[22] 顾伟欣, 周红.基于逐步回归分析的孔隙度预测方法.石油地质与工程, 2008, 22(1):37-39. GU W X, ZHOU H. Porosity prediction method based on stepwise regression analysis. Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 2008, 22(1):37-39.
[1] 潘有军, 荆文波, 徐赢, 赵嗣君, 李继成, 陶登海. 火山岩油藏水平井体积压裂产能预测研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(3): 159-164.
[2] 殷代印, 项俊辉, 王东琪. 大庆油田长垣外围特低渗透扶杨油层综合分类[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(1): 150-154.
[3] 周游, 李治平, 景成, 谷潇雨, 孙威, 李晓. 基于“岩石物理相-流动单元”测井响应定量评价特低渗透油藏优质储层——以延长油田东部油区长6油层组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(1): 116-123.
[4] 关恒. 基于液油比的特高含水期水驱开发指标预测方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(5): 100-103.
[5] 石玉江,李长喜,李高仁,李霞,周金昱,郭浩鹏. 特低渗透油藏源储配置与富集区优选测井评价方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(4): 45-50.
[6] 于成龙,李慧敏,赵敏,罗池辉. 水驱油田井网加密合理井数的计算方法研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(1): 111-113.
[7] 刘云, 卢渊,伊向艺,张俊良,张锦良,王振喜. 天然气水合物预测模型及其影响因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(3): 124-127.
[8] 李善鹏,吴凯,方艳兵. 特低渗透油藏启动压力现象研究———以侯市地区为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(1): 125-127.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 旷红伟,高振中,王正允,王晓光. 一种独特的隐蔽油藏——夏9井区成岩圈闭油藏成因分析及其对勘探的启迪[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 8 -14 .
[2] 李国军, 郑荣才,唐玉林,汪洋,唐楷. 川东北地区飞仙关组层序- 岩相古地理特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 64 -70 .
[3] 蔡佳. 琼东南盆地长昌凹陷新近系三亚组沉积相[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(5): 46 -54 .
[4] 章惠, 关达, 向雪梅, 陈勇. 川东北元坝东部须四段裂缝型致密砂岩储层预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(1): 133 -139 .
[5] 付广,刘博,吕延防. 泥岩盖层对各种相态天然气封闭能力综合评价方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 21 -26 .
[6] 马中良,曾溅辉,张善文,王永诗,王洪玉,刘惠民. 砂岩透镜体油运移过程模拟及成藏主控因素分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 69 -74 .
[7] 王英民. 对层序地层学工业化应用中层序分级混乱问题的探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 9 -15 .
[8] 卫平生, 潘树新, 王建功, 雷 明. 湖岸线和岩性地层油气藏的关系研究 —— 论“坳陷盆地湖岸线控油”[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 27 -31 .
[9] 易定红, 石兰亭, 贾义蓉. 吉尔嘎朗图凹陷宝饶洼槽阿尔善组层序地层与隐蔽油藏[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 68 -72 .
[10] 杨占龙, 彭立才, 陈启林, 郭精义, 李在光, 黄云峰. 吐哈盆地胜北洼陷岩性油气藏成藏条件与油气勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 62 -67 .