岩性油气藏 ›› 2026, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (5): 51–59.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20260505

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

塔里木盆地西南部巴什托普断裂构造特征及形成机制

王斌1(), 陈立豪2,3(), 杨连刚1, 屈洋1, 杨鹏飞1, 田雷2,3, 王宏斌2,3, 刘军2,3   

  1. 1 中国石油塔里木油田公司 勘探开发研究院, 新疆 库尔勒 841000
    2 中国石油勘探开发研究院 西北分院, 兰州 730020
    3 中国石油天然气集团油藏描述重点实验室, 兰州 730020
  • 收稿日期:2025-11-09 修回日期:2026-03-11 出版日期:2026-09-01 发布日期:2026-09-04
  • 第一作者:王斌(1986—),男,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事石油勘探方面的研究工作。地址:(841000)新疆维吾尔自治区巴音郭楞蒙古自治州库尔勒市塔里木油田研发中心。Email:wangb3-tlm@petrochina.com.cn
  • 通信作者: 陈立豪
  • 基金资助:
    中石油集团公司基础前瞻性科技项目“叠合盆地中下组合规模圈闭形成机制与有效性研究”(2023ZZ0205);塔里木油田横向“库车-塔北超深层构造变形机理与地震关键技术攻关”(041024110201);新型油气勘探开发国家科技重大专项“四川盆地全油气系统与新领域勘探技术”(2025ZD1400400);中石油集团公司基础前瞻性科技项目“海相克拉通盆地构造沉积分异与规模优质储层发育规律研究”(2026DJ010)

Structural characteristics and formation mechanisms of Bashituopu Fault in southwestern Tarim Basin

WANG Bin1(), CHEN Lihao2,3(), YANG Liangang1, QU Yang1, YANG Pengfei1, TIAN Lei2,3, WANG Hongbin2,3, LIU Jun2,3   

  1. 1 Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and DevelopmentPetroChina Tarim Oilfield CompanyKorla 841000,Xinjiang, China
    2 Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development-Northwest(NWGI)PetroChinaLanzhou 730020, China
    3 Key Laboratory of Reservoir Descripyion, CNPCLanzhou 730020, China
  • Received:2025-11-09 Revised:2026-03-11 Online:2026-09-01 Published:2026-09-04
  • Contact: CHEN Lihao E-mail:wangb3-tlm@petrochina.com.cn;chen_lh@petrochina.com.cn

摘要:

基于高精度三维地震资料,重新厘定塔里木盆地西南部巴什托普断裂几何学特征。以奥陶系碳酸盐岩F1走滑断裂与巴什托普逆冲断裂为地质原型,构建砂箱物理模拟模型,系统剖析断裂演化机制、油气成藏控制效应,并预测有利勘探区带。研究表明:①巴什托普断裂带为陡倾走滑-逆冲复合断层,北东向张扭性走滑断裂发育显著,逆冲断裂断面倾角50°~65°,沿中寒武统膏盐层滑脱,呈现“下断上褶”典型构造特征。②断裂形态由多期、多方位挤压应力叠加控制,加里东期受西昆仑北东向挤压,形成走滑断裂雏形;海西早期受南西—北东向主压应力,基底断裂改造活化,发育大规模走滑构造;晚海西—印支期受南天山南西西向强烈挤压,应力场由拉张转为压扭,形成走滑-逆冲复合构造,与三维地震资料刻画结果高度吻合。③断裂带控制3期成藏演化,加里东期油气聚集于寒武系盐下;海西期通源走滑断裂疏导油气至奥陶系,经不整合面侧向运移形成古油藏;喜山期构造调整改造为残余油藏。多期断裂活动主导油气分段富集,断裂、裂缝改善储层储渗性能,盐上逆冲断裂控制圈闭形态,分段走滑断裂构建充注通道,高应变区储层品质最优。综合分析认为,深层F2断裂及次级断裂发育的东部“串珠状”反射区、浅层构造南翼东河砂岩群古2井区通源走滑断裂带,为研究区核心有利勘探区带。

关键词: 巴什托普断裂, 走滑-逆冲复合断裂, 构造应力场, 断裂活动, 砂箱实验模拟, 深层断溶体, 油气成藏, 奥陶系碳酸盐岩储层, 塔里木盆地

Abstract:

Based on high-precision 3D seismic data, geometric characteristics of Bashituopu Fault in southwestern Tarim Basin are redetermined. Taking the F1 strike-slip fault and Bashituopu thrust fault on the top surface of Ordovician carbonate rocks as geological prototypes, a sandbox physical simulation model was constructed to systematically analyze the fault evolution mechanism and its controlling effect on hydrocarbon accumulation, and predict favorable exploration zones.The results show that: (1) Bashituopu fault zone is a steeply dipping strike-slip and thrust composite fault, with NE-trending transtensional strike-slip faults prominently developed. The thrust faults sections have a dip angle of 50°-65°, and the faults detach along Middle Cambrian gypsum-salt layer, presenting a typical structural feature of “lower fault and upper fold”. (2) The fault morpho-logy is controlled by the superposition of multi-stage and multi-direction compressive stress. During Caledonian period, NE-trending compression from the West Kunlun formed the prototype of strike-slip faults. In the Early Hercynian period, under SW-NE principal compressive stress, basement faults were reactivated and transformed, and large-scale strike-slip structures developed. From Late Hercynian to Indosinian period, intense SWW compression from the South Tianshan shifted the stress field from transtension to transpression, forming strike-slip and thrust composite faults, which is highly consistent with 3D seismic interpretation results. (3) The fault zone controls three stages of hydrocarbon accumulation evolution. Hydrocarbons accumulated in Cambrian subsalt strata in Caledonian period. In the Hercynian period, source-connected strike-slip faults transported hydrocarbons to Ordovician strata, forming paleo-oil reservoirs via lateral migration along unconformities,and during Himalayan period, structural adjustment transformed them into residual oil reservoirs. Multi-stage fault activities dominate hydrocarbon segmented enrichment. Fault fractures improve reservoir porosity and permeability, suprasalt thrust faults control trap morphology, segmented strike-slip faults construct charging pathways, reservoirs in high fault strain zones have optimal quality. Comprehensive analysis suggests that the eastern “beaded” reflection zone developed in deep F2 fault and secondary faults, and the source-connected strike-slip fault zone in Qungu 2 well area of Donghe sandstone intervals on the southern flank of the shallow structure, are core favorable exploration targets.

Key words: Bashitopu Fault, strike-slip and thrust composite fault, tectonic stress field, fault activity, sandbox experiment simulation, deep fault-related dissolution body, hydrocarbon accumulation, Ordovician carbonate reservoir, Tarim Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE121.3

图1

塔里木盆地西南部巴什托普断裂奥陶系顶面相干断裂分布特征(a)及岩性地层综合柱状图(b)"

图2

塔里木盆地西南部巴什托普逆冲-走滑断裂纲要及地震剖面(剖面位置见图1a)"

表1

塔里木盆地西南部巴什托普断裂带古生界砂箱物理模型参数设计"

材料类别 L g ρ1 ρ2 μ 应力 应变速率
模型 1.0×10-2 9.8 1 300.00 987.00 1.20×104 α ε
实际工区 5.0×103 9.8 2 400.00 2 200.00 10.00×1018
模型/实际工区 2.0×10-6 1.0 0.54 0.45 0.12×10-14 1.08×10-6 1.30×105

图3

塔里木盆地西南部巴什托普断裂砂箱物理模型中底板设计方案(a)及地层铺设(b)"

图4

塔里木盆地西南部巴什托普断裂带砂箱物理模型模拟走滑-逆冲断裂构造体系平面(a)及剖面特征(b)"

图5

塔里木盆地西南部巴什托普断裂带油气成藏模式(据文献[7]修改)"

图6

塔里木盆地西南部巴什托普断裂油气有利成藏断裂分布预测"

[1] 胡建中, 谭应佳, 张平, 等. 塔里木盆地西南缘山前带逆冲推覆构造特征[J]. 地学前缘, 2008, 15(2):222-231.
HU Jianzhong, TAN Yingjia, ZHANG Ping, et al. Structural features of Cenozoic thrust-fault belts in the piedmont of southwestern Tarim Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2008, 15(2):222-231.
[2] 肖安成, 杨树锋, 王清华, 等. 塔里木盆地巴楚—柯坪地区南北向断裂系统的空间对应性研究[J]. 地质科学, 2002, 37 (增刊1):64-72.
XIAO Ancheng, YANG Shufeng, WANG Qinghua, et al. Corresponding relation of S-N-striking fault systems in the Bachu-Kalpin area,Tarim Basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology (Scientia Geologica Sinica), 2002, 37 (Suppl 1):64-72.
[3] 张强, 黄太柱, 李慧莉, 等. 塔里木盆地西部的新生代断裂活动特征[J]. 岩石学报, 2016, 32(3):833-846.
ZHANG Qiang, HUANG Taizhu, LI Huili, et al. The Cenozoic faults in western Tarim Basin,NW China[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2016, 32(3):833-846.
[4] 孟庆龙, 李曰俊, 敬兵, 等. 塔里木盆地西部巴什托普断裂的主要特征及其油气勘探意义[J]. 地质科学, 2008, 43 (3):569-575.
MENG Qinglong, LI Yuejun, JING Bing, et al. Main characte-ristics of the Bashituopu fault and its petroleum potential in the western Tarim Basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 2008, 43(3):569-575.
[5] 丁文龙, 漆立新, 云露, 等. 塔里木盆地巴楚—麦盖提地区古构造演化及其对奥陶系储层发育的控制作用[J]. 岩石学报, 2012, 28(8):2542-2556.
DING Wenlong, QI Lixin, YUN Lu, et al. The tectonic evolution and its controlling effects on the development of Ordovician reservoir in Bachu-Markit Tarim basin[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2012, 28(8):2542-2556.
[6] 唐大卿, 陈红汉, 云露, 等. 塔里木盆地巴楚隆起断裂差异活动特征及成因演化[J]. 地质科学, 2014, 49(1):49-68.
TANG Daqing, CHEN Honghan, YUN Lu, et al. The differential activity characteristics and its evolution of the faults in the Bachu Uplift,Tarim Basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 2014, 49(1):49-68.
[7] 陈秀艳, 孙崇浩, 陶小晚, 等. 塔里木盆地麦盖提斜坡西段成藏演化与有利勘探区域:以巴什托普油田为例[J]. 地质科学, 2024, 59(4):991-1002.
CHEN Xiuyan, SUN Chonghao, TAO Xiaowan, et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation and favorable exploration areas in the western Maigaiti slope of Tarim Basin:A case study of Bashituo-pu oilfield[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 2024, 59(4):991-1002.
[8] 张厚福, 徐兆辉. 从油气藏研究的历史论地层-岩性油气藏勘探[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1):114-123.
ZHANG Houfu, XU Zhaohui. Discussion on stratigraphic-lithologic reservoirs exploration in the aspect of the research history of reservoirs[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(1):114-123.
[9] 汤良杰, 漆立新, 邱海峻, 等. 塔里木盆地断裂构造分期差异活动及其变形机理[J]. 岩石学报, 2012, 28(8):2569-2583.
TANG Liangjie, QI Lixin, QIU Haijun, et al. Poly-phase diffe-rential fault movement and hydrocarbon accumulation of the Tarim Basin,NW China[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2012, 28(8):2569-2583.
[10] 肖阳, 邬光辉, 雷永良, 等. 走滑断裂带贯穿过程与发育模式的物理模拟[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2017, 44(3):340-348.
XIAO Yang, WU Guanghui, LEI Yongliang, et al. Analogue modeling of through-going process and development pattern of strike-slip fault zone[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44(3):340-348.
[11] 曹自成, 蒋华山, 张俊程, 等. 塔里木盆地西南地区前寒武纪基底结构及其演化[J]. 石油实验地质, 2023, 45(5):844-856.
CAO Zicheng, JIANG Huashan, ZHANG Juncheng, et al. Structure and evolution of Precambrian basement in southwestern Tarim Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2023, 45(5):844-856.
[12] 杨勇, 汤良杰, 蒋华山, 等. 塔里木盆地巴楚隆起断裂分期差异活动特征及其变形机理[J]. 石油实验地质, 2014, 36(3):275-284.
YANG Yong, TANG Liangjie, JIANG Huashan, et al. Characteristics and deformation mechanism of staging differential fault activities in Bachu Uplift,Tarim Basin[J]. Petroleum Geo-logy & Experiment, 2014, 36(3):275-284.
[13] 肖安成, 杨树锋, 李曰俊, 等. 塔里木盆地巴楚隆起断裂系统主要形成时代的新认识[J]. 地质科学, 2005, 40(2):291-302.
XIAO Ancheng, YANG Shufeng, LI Yuejun, et al. Main period for creation of fracture system in the Bachu uplift,Tarim Basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology(Scientia Geologica Sinica), 2005, 40(2):291-302.
[14] 肖安成, 贾承造, 杨树锋, 等. 中国南天山西部冲断褶皱系前缘区的运动学特征[J]. 沉积学报, 2000, 18(3):439-444.
XIAO Ancheng, JIA Chengzao, YANG Shufeng, et al. The kinematics characters of the thrust-foldbelts western front regions in Southern Tianshan,China[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2000, 18(3):439-444.
[15] 邬光辉, 成丽芳, 刘玉魁, 等. 塔里木盆地寒武-奥陶系走滑断裂系统特征及其控油作用[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2011, 32(3):239-243.
WU Guanghui, CHENG Lifang, LIU Yukui, et al. Strike-slip fault system of the Cambrian-Ordovician and its oil-controlling effect in Tarim Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2011, 32(3):239-243.
[16] 丁文龙, 林畅松, 漆立新, 等. 塔里木盆地巴楚隆起构造格架及形成演化[J]. 地学前缘, 2008, 15(2):242-252.
DING Wenlong, LIN Changsong, QI Lixin, et al. Structural framework and evolution of Bachu uplift in Tarim basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2008, 15(2):242-252.
[17] 刘高波, 施泽进, 佘晓宇. 巴楚—麦盖提的区域构造演化与油气分布规律[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 31( 2):157-161.
LIU Gaobo, SHI Zejin, SHE Xiaoyu. Regional tectonic evolution and distribution of Bachu-Markit[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition), 2004, 31(2):157-161.
[18] 张仲培, 刘士林, 杨子玉, 等. 塔里木盆地麦盖提斜坡构造演化及油气地质意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2011, 32(6):909-919.
ZHANG Zhongpei, LIU Shilin, YANG Ziyu, et al. Tectonic evolution and its petroleum geological significances of the Maigaiti Slop,Tarim Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2011, 32(6):909‑919.
[19] 崔海峰, 田雷, 刘军, 等. 塔西南坳陷麦盖提斜坡油气成藏模式[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2016, 21(6):34‑42.
CUI Haifeng, TIAN Lei, LIU Jun, et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation pattern of reservoirs in Maigaiti slope,Southwest Tarim depression[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2016, 21(6):34‑42.
[20] 汤良杰, 邱海峻, 云露, 等. 塔里木盆地北缘—南天山造山带盆-山耦合和构造转换[J]. 地学前缘, 2012, 19(5):195-204.
TANG Liangjie, QIU Haijun, YUN Lu, et al. Analysis of basin-mountain coupling and transition of the Northern Tarim Basin-Southern Tianshan Orogenic Belt[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2012, 19(5):195-204.
[21] 熊加贝, 何登发. 全球碳酸盐岩地层-岩性大油气田分布特征及其控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(1):187-200.
XIONG Jiabei, HE Dengfa. Distribution characteristics and controlling factors of global giant carbonate stratigraphic-lithologic oil and gas fields[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(1):187-200.
[22] 刘高波. 巴楚一麦盖提地区构造演化与油气分布关系[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2005.
LIU Gaobo. The relationship between structural evolution and hydrocarbon distribution in the Bachu-Maigaiti region[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2005.
[23] 牛一奎. 塔西南坳陷麦盖提斜坡下古生界油气成藏规律[D]. 北京: 中国石油大学(北京), 2022.
NIU Yikui. Hydrocarbon accumulation regularity of lower Paleozoic in Maigaiti Slope,southwest depression of Tarim Basin[D]. Beijing: China University of Petroleum (Beijing), 2022.
[24] MCClAY K, BONORA M. Analog models of restraining stepovers in strike-slip fault systems[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2001, 85(2):233-260.
[25] RITTER M C, LEEVER K, ROSENAU M, et al. Scaling the sandbox-mechanical (dis) similarities of granular materials and brittle rock[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research:Solid Earth, 2016, 121(9):6863-6879.
[26] FEDORIK J, ZWAAN F, SCHREURS G, et al. The interaction between strike-slip dominated fault zones and thrust belt structures:Insights from 4D analogue models[J]. Journal of Structural Geology, 2019, 122:89-105.
[27] D’ADDA P, LONGONI R, MAGISTRONI C, et al. Extensional reactivation of a deep transpressional architecture:Insights from sandbox analogue modeling applied to the Val d’Agri Basin (Southern Apennines,Italy)[J]. Interpretation, 2017, 5(1):SD55-SD66.
[28] ADAM J, URAI J L, WIENEKE B, et al. Shear localisation and strain distribution during tectonic faulting:New insights from granular-flow experiments and high-resolution optical image correlation techniques[J]. Journal of Structural Geology, 2005, 27(2):283-301.
[29] HUS R, ACOCELLA V, FUNICIELLO R, et al. Sandbox models of relay ramp structure and evolution[J]. Journal of Structural Geology, 2005, 27(3):459-473.
[30] DUVALL M J, WALDRON J W F, GODIN L, et al. Active strike-slip faults and an outer frontal thrust in the Himalayan foreland basin[J]. PNAS, 2020, 117(30):17615-17621.
[31] BARNETT J A M, MORTIMER J, RIPPON J H, et al. Displacement geometry in the volume containing a single normal fault[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1987, 71(8):925-937.
[32] CHAMPION J, MUELLER K, TATE A, et al. Geometry,numerical models and revised slip rate for the Reelfoot fault and trishear fault-propagation fold,New Madrid seismic zone[J]. Engineering Geology, 2001, 62(1/2/3):31-49.
[33] DOOLEY T P, SCHREURS G. Analogue modelling of intraplate strike-slip tectonics:A teview and new rxperimental tesults[J]. Tectonophysics, 2012,574-575:1-71.
[1] 陈旋, 杨斌, 张华, 苟红光, 胡军, 付国斌, 郝彬, 程祎. 吐哈盆地台北凹陷前侏罗系烃源岩演化特征及油气成藏过程[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2026, 38(5): 10-22.
[2] 金值民, 张本健, 关旭, 王小娟, 冯昌, 吴长江, 杨棵, 马诗杰. 四川盆地梓潼地区断裂演化特征及控储作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2026, 38(5): 60-70.
[3] 穆洁, 史飞洲, 高宇航, 陈胜红, 朱博华. 基于全方位成像的碳酸盐岩缝洞异常提取与识别[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2026, 38(5): 115-124.
[4] 张雨晴, 赵仲祥, 王尉, 何幼斌, 罗进雄, 胡明毅, 杨星宇, 伍炼华. 川东南三叠系嘉陵江组碳酸盐岩-膏盐岩沉积特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2026, 38(4): 101-114.
[5] 徐浩轩, 付广. 渤海湾盆地歧口凹陷南部斜坡馆陶组成藏时间厘定[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2026, 38(4): 53-62.
[6] 云露, 曹自成, 李海英, 耿锋, 刘永立, 魏华动, 黄诚, 张笛. 塔里木盆地北部奥陶系穹隆构造发育特征及油气勘探潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2026, 38(3): 1-11.
[7] 刘洪, 张文学. 断溶体油藏水侵评价方法——以顺北一区奥陶系一间房组油藏为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2026, 38(2): 194-200.
[8] 常少英, 董科良, 曾溅辉, 杨冀宁, 王孟修, 刘玲利. 塔里木盆地富满油田走滑断裂演化特征及其对油气运聚的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2026, 38(2): 44-55.
[9] 肖萌, 周勇, 王柯, 闫璟驰, 张粤杰. 松辽盆地南部梨树断陷白垩系沙河子组古地貌特征及控砂机制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2026, 38(1): 146-161.
[10] 刘海钰, 李珊珊, 郭潇潇, 罗威, 梁刚, 王碧维. 琼东南盆地宝岛凹陷南坡渐新统陵水组油气来源及成藏机制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2026, 38(1): 89-99.
[11] 黄诚, 朱莲花, 卜旭强, 曾溅辉, 隆辉, 廖文毫, 刘亚洲, 乔俊程. 塔里木盆地顺北地区走滑断裂特征及控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(6): 107-118.
[12] 江山, 唐永建, 焦霞蓉, 李文亮, 黄成, 王泽. 塔里木盆地顺北油田4号断裂带断控体凝析气藏剩余气分布规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(4): 84-94.
[13] 谢会文, 张亮, 王斌, 罗浩渝, 张科, 章国威, 李玲, 申林. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷三叠纪古构造特征及对沉积的控制作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(3): 13-22.
[14] 杨旭, 白鸣生, 龚汉渤, 李皋, 陶祖文. 川西新场地区三叠系须二段构造裂缝特征及定量预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(3): 73-83.
[15] 梁鑫鑫, 张银涛, 陈石, 谢舟, 周建勋, 康鹏飞, 陈九洲, 彭梓俊. 塔里木盆地富满油田走滑断裂多核破碎带地震响应特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(2): 127-138.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!