岩性油气藏 ›› 2015, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (5): 13–18.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2015.05.003

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于数字露头的地质信息提取与分析

刘学锋1,马乙云12,曾齐红2,邵燕林1,张友焱2,叶 勇2   

  1.  1. 长江大学 地球科学学院,武汉 430100 ; 2. 中国石油勘探开发研究院,北京 100083
  • 出版日期:2015-09-26 发布日期:2015-09-26
  • 作者简介:刘学锋( 1967- ),男,博士后,教授,主要从事含油气盆地构造分析、地理信息系统应用、地学三维建模与可视化等方面的教学与科研工作。 地址:( 430100 )湖北省武汉市蔡甸区大学路 111 号长江大学地球科学学院。 E-mail:lxf02@163.com 。
  • 基金资助:

    国家重大科技专项“复杂储层油气测井解释理论方法与处理技术”(编号: 2011ZX05020-008 )资助

Geological information extraction and analysis based on digital outcrop :A case of Yangjiagou section of the Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin

Liu Xuefeng1, Ma Yiyun12, Zeng Qihong2, Shao Yanlin1, Zhang Youyan2, Ye Yong2   

  1.  1. School of Geosciences , Yangtze University , Wuhan 430100 , China ; 2. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development , Beijing 100083 , China
  • Online:2015-09-26 Published:2015-09-26

摘要:

为了改进传统露头研究方法的不足,以及客观、全面地认识露头所揭示的地质信息,将激光雷达技术应用到露头地层成图研究中,并利用计算机技术实现地层图像可视化,形成了鄂尔多斯盆地上三叠统延长组杨家沟剖面数字露头。 基于数字露头开展上三叠统延长组长 3 油层组层序地层、沉积旋回和砂体展布等地质信息的提取与分析,并利用典型层序界面识别标志,结合层序地层学理论,在数字露头上进行层序边界识别和层序界面追踪,划分出 1 个四级层序界面,其界面之下地层岩性表现为反旋回,界面之上地层岩性表现为正旋回,层序界面对应的位置砂体最厚。 通过建立研究区沉积旋回的识别标志,在数字露头上进行沉积旋回界面的追踪与对比,识别出了 3 个不对称式短期旋回,这 3 个短期旋回又可组成 1 个四级基准面上升半旋回,为一套整体向上变细的四级准层序组,其砂体厚度向上具有减小的趋势。 通过建立砂体解释标志,分别在四级基准面旋回底部和剖面顶部识别出了典型的河道砂体,进而对露头解剖的单砂体内部砂层进行了精细刻画与对比。 总体认为,剖面岩性以细砂岩和粗粉砂岩为主,局部夹暗色泥岩和页岩;砂体侧向迁移,在垂向上呈多期叠置关系,横向上变化较大。

关键词: 非均质性, 致密砂岩气, 甜点综合评价, 沙河子组, 徐家围子断陷

Abstract:

In order to improve the shortcomings of the traditional method of outcrop research and cognize geological information more objectively and comprehensively from outcrop, the laser radar technique was applied to the study of outcrop stratigraphic mapping. With the use of computer visualization, this paper constructed digital outcrop of Yangjiagou section of the Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin. Geological information extraction and analysis were carried out based on digital outcrop, such as the sequence stratigraphy, sedimentary cycle and sand body distribution of Chang 3 oil reservoir set of Yanchang Formation. Through establishing typical sequence boundary identification marks and combining with the theory of sequence stratigraphy, sequence boundary identifying and tracking on digital outcrop were conducted and a fourth-order sequence boundary was identified. A positive cycle and a reverse cycle were respectively developed above and below the boundary, and the location of the thickest sand body is corresponding to the fourth-order sequence boundary. Through establishing sedimentary cycle identification marks, tracing and contrasting sedimentary cycle interface on digital outcrop, three asymmetric short-term cycles were identified. These three short-term cycles can compose a fourth-order base level rising half cycle. It is a set of the overall upward trend of the fourth-order parasequence-set, with the trend of decreasing thickness upward of sand body. Through the establishment of sand body interpretation marks, typical channel sand body were respectively identified at the bottom of the fourth-order base level cycle and the top of the profile. And then, fine description and comparison of the internal layer of single sand body was made according to the outcrop anatomy. Comparison results show that the main lithology of the profile is fine sand and coarse silt, locally clipping dark mudstone or shale.

Key words: heterogeneity, tight sandstone gas, comprehensive evaluation of sweet point, Shahezi Formation, Xujiaweizi fault depression

[ 1 ] Bellian J A , Kerans C , Jennette D C. Digital outcrop models : Applications of terrestrial scanning lidar technology in stratigraphic modeling [ J ] . Journal of Sedimentary Research , 2005 , 75 ( 2 ): 166-176.

[ 2 ] Janson X , Kerans C , Bellian J A , et al. Three-dimensional geological and synthetic seismic model of Early Permian redeposited basinal carbonate deposits , Victorio Canyon , West Texas [ J ] . AAPG Bulletin , 2007 , 91 ( 10 ): 1405-1436.

[ 3 ] Phelps R M , Kerans C , Scott S Z , et al. Three-dimensional modeling and sequence stratigraphy of a carbonate ramp-to-shelf transition ,Permian Upper San Andres Formation [ J ] . Sedimentology , 2008 ,55 ( 6 ): 1777-1813.

[ 4 ] Fabuel-Perez I , Hodgetts D , Redfern J. Integration of digital outcrop models ( DOMs ) and high resolution sedimentology-workflow and im-

plications for geological modelling : Oukaimeden Sandstone Formation , High Atlas ( Morocco )[ J ] . Petroleum Geoscience , 2010 , 16 ( 2 ):133-154.

[ 5 ] Zeng Qihong , Xie Xing. Digital outcrop modeling and geology information extraction based on ground-based Lidar [ C ] . International Conference on Audio , Shanghai : Language and Image Processing ,2012.

[ 6 ] 朱如凯,白斌,袁选俊,等 . 利用数字露头模型技术对曲流河三角洲沉积储层特征的研究[ J ] . 沉积学报, 2013 , 31 ( 5 ): 867-877.

Zhu Rukai , Bai Bin , Yuan Xuanjun , et al. A new approach for outcrop characterizationand geostatistical analysis of meandering channels sandbodies within a delta plain setting using digital outcrop models : Upper Triassic Yanchang tight sandstone Formation , Yanhe outcrop , Ordos Basin [ J ] . Acta sedimentologica Sinica , 2013 , 31 ( 5 ):867-877.

[ 7 ] 郑剑锋,沈安江,乔占峰,等 . 基于激光雷达技术的三维数字露头及其在地质建模中的应用—— — 以巴楚地区大班塔格剖面礁滩复合体为例[ J ] . 海相油气地质, 2014 , 19 ( 3 ): 72- 78.

Zheng Jianfeng , Shen Anjiang , Qiao Zhanfeng , et al. Lidar-based 3D digital outcrop modeling and application in geologic modeling :A case of modeling of middle Ordovician reef-beach carbonate body at Dabantage outcrop in Bachu Uplift , Tarim Basin [ J ] . Marine Origin Petroleum Geology , 2014 , 19 ( 3 ): 72-78.

[ 8 ] 罗忠,罗平,张兴阳,等 . 层序界面对砂岩成岩作用及储层质量的影响—— — 以鄂尔多斯盆地延河露头上三叠统延长组为例[ J ] . 沉积学报, 2007 , 25 ( 6 ): 903-914.

Luo Zhong , Luo Ping , Zhang Xingyang , et al. Effect of sequence boundary on sandstones diagenesis and reservoir quality : An outcrop study from the Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation , Ordos Basin ,northwest China [ J ] . Acta Sedimentologica Sinica , 2007 , 25 ( 6 ):903-914.

[ 9 ] 朱小燕,李爱琴,段晓晨,等 . 镇北油田延长组长 3 油层组精细地层划分与对比[ J ] . 岩性油气藏, 2007 , 19 ( 4 ): 82-86.

Zhu Xiaoyan , Li Aiqin , Duan Xiaochen , et al. Fine stratigraphic classification and correlation of Chang 3 reservoir of Yanchang Formation in Zhenbei Oilfield [ J ] . Lithologic Reservoirs , 2007 , 19( 4 ): 82-86.

[ 10 ] 张昌民,尹太举,李少华,等 . 基准面旋回对河道砂体几何形态的控制作用—— — 以枣园油田孔一段枣 Ⅱ — Ⅲ 油组为例[ J ] . 岩性油气藏, 2007 , 19 ( 4 ): 9-12.

Zhang Changmin , YinTaiju , Li Shaohua , et al. Control of base level cycles on channel sand geometry : A case study on ZaoⅡ-Ⅲ reservoirs , Zaoyuan Oilfield [ J ] . Lithologic Reservoirs , 2007 , 19 ( 4 ):9-12.

[ 11 ] 刘波 . 基准面旋回与沉积旋回的对比方法探讨[ J ] . 沉积学报,2002 , 20 ( 1 ): 112- 117.

Liu Bo. Discussion on the correlation methods of base-level cycle and sedimentary cycle sequence [ J ] . Acta Sedimentologica Sinica ,2002 , 20 ( 1 ): 112- 117.

[ 12 ] 宋凯,吕剑文,杜金良,等 . 鄂尔多斯盆地中部上三叠统延长组物源方向分析与三角洲沉积体系[ J ] . 古地理学报, 2002 , 4 ( 3 ):59- 66.

Song Kai , Lü Jianwen , Du Jinliang , et al. Source direction analysis and delta depositional systems of Yanchang Formation of the Upper Triassic in the central Ordos Basin [ J ] . Journal of Palaeogeograph ,2002 , 4 ( 3 ): 59- 66.

[ 13 ] 石雪峰,杜海峰 . 姬塬地区长 3 —长 4+5 油层组沉积相研究[ J ] .岩性油气藏, 2008 , 20 ( 1 ): 59-63.

Shi Xuefeng , Du Haifeng. Study on the sedimentary facies of the member 3 and 4+5 of Yanchang Formation in Jiyuan area [ J ] . Lithologic Reservoirs , 2008 , 20 ( 1 ): 59-63.

[ 14 ] 郑荣才,王海红,韩永林,等 . 鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区长 6 段沉积相特征和砂体展布[ J ] . 岩性油气藏, 2008 , 20 ( 3 ): 21-26.

Zheng Rongcai , Wang Haihong , Han Yonglin , et al. Sedimentary facies characteristics and sandbody distribution of Chang 6 member in Jiyuan area of Ordos Basin [ J ] . Lithologic Reservoirs , 2008 , 20( 3 ): 21-26.

[ 15 ] 王伟力,高海仁 . 鄂尔多斯盆地中东部致密砂岩储层地质特征及控制因素[ J ] . 岩性油气藏, 2013 , 25 ( 6 ): 71-77.

Wang Weili , Gao Hairen. Geologic characteristics and controlling factors of tight sand reservoir in the mid-eastern Ordos Basin [ J ] .Lithologic Reservoirs , 2013 , 25 ( 6 ): 71-77.

[1] 柴毓, 王贵文, 柴新. 四川盆地金秋区块三叠系须二段储层非均质性及成因[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 29-40.
[2] 刘桓, 苏勤, 曾华会, 孟会杰, 张小美, 雍运动. 近地表Q补偿技术在川中地区致密气勘探中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 104-112.
[3] 龙盛芳, 王玉善, 李国良, 段传丽, 邵映明, 何咏梅, 陈凌云, 焦煦. 苏里格气田苏49区块盒8下亚段致密储层非均质性特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 59-69.
[4] 梁志凯, 李卓, 李连霞, 姜振学, 刘冬冬, 高凤琳, 刘晓庆, 肖磊, 杨有东. 松辽盆地长岭断陷沙河子组页岩孔径多重分形特征与岩相的关系[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 22-35.
[5] 曹江骏, 陈朝兵, 罗静兰, 王茜. 自生黏土矿物对深水致密砂岩储层微观非均质性的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地西南部合水地区长6油层组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 36-49.
[6] 戚涛, 胡勇, 李骞, 赵梓寒, 张春, 李滔. 考虑弥散的混溶驱替模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5): 161-169.
[7] 侯科锋, 李进步, 张吉, 王龙, 田敏. 苏里格致密砂岩气藏未动用储量评价及开发对策[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4): 115-125.
[8] 刘俞佐, 石万忠, 刘凯, 王任, 吴睿. 鄂尔多斯盆地杭锦旗东部地区上古生界天然气成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3): 56-67.
[9] 陈怡婷, 刘洛夫, 王梦尧, 窦文超, 徐正建. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部长6、长7储集层特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(1): 51-65.
[10] 柳娜, 周兆华, 任大忠, 南珺祥, 刘登科, 杜堃. 致密砂岩气藏可动流体分布特征及其控制因素——以苏里格气田西区盒8段与山1段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(6): 14-25.
[11] 任大忠, 周兆华, 梁睿翔, 周然, 柳娜, 南郡祥. 致密砂岩气藏黏土矿物特征及其对储层性质的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(4): 42-53.
[12] 段治有, 李贤庆, 陈纯芳, 马立元, 罗源. 杭锦旗地区J58井区下石盒子组气水分布及其控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(3): 45-54.
[13] 徐波, 王建, 于乐丹, 王凯泽, 董凤娟, 刘峰. 致密油储层成岩相类型及其对产能的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地姜家川地区长8储层为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(6): 109-116.
[14] 臧士宾, 郑永仙, 崔俊, 毛建英, 张小波. 砂砾岩储集层微观非均质性定量评价——以柴达木盆地昆北油田为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(3): 35-42.
[15] 曹茜, 王志章, 王野, 张栋梁, 公言杰, 邹开真, 樊太亮. 砂砾岩储层分布非均质性和质量非均质性研究——以克拉玛依油田五2东区克上组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(2): 129-138.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨秋莲, 李爱琴, 孙燕妮, 崔攀峰. 超低渗储层分类方法探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 51 -56 .
[2] 张杰, 赵玉华. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组地震层序地层研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 71 -74 .
[3] 杨占龙, 张正刚, 陈启林, 郭精义,沙雪梅, 刘文粟. 利用地震信息评价陆相盆地岩性圈闭的关键点分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 57 -63 .
[4] 朱小燕, 李爱琴, 段晓晨, 田随良, 刘美荣. 镇北油田延长组长3 油层组精细地层划分与对比[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 82 -86 .
[5] 方朝合, 王义凤, 郑德温, 葛稚新. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系烃源岩显微组分分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 87 -90 .
[6] 韩春元,赵贤正,金凤鸣,王权,李先平,王素卿. 二连盆地地层岩性油藏“多元控砂—四元成藏—主元富集”与勘探实践(IV)——勘探实践[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 15 -20 .
[7] 戴朝成,郑荣才,文华国,张小兵. 辽东湾盆地旅大地区古近系层序—岩相古地理编图[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 39 -46 .
[8] 尹艳树,张尚峰,尹太举. 钟市油田潜江组含盐层系高分辨率层序地层格架及砂体分布规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 53 -58 .
[9] 石雪峰,杜海峰. 姬塬地区长3—长4+5油层组沉积相研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 59 -63 .
[10] 严世邦,胡望水,李瑞升,关键,李涛,聂晓红. 准噶尔盆地红车断裂带同生逆冲断裂特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 64 -68 .