川西坳陷须五段致密砂岩与泥页岩储层特征及控制因素

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2017.04.005

岩性油气藏 ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (4): 38–46.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2017.04.005

川西坳陷须五段致密砂岩与泥页岩储层特征及控制因素

史洪亮^1,2, 杨克明², 王同²

1. 成都理工大学能源学院, 成都 610059;
2. 中国石化西南油气分公司勘探开发研究院, 成都 610000

收稿日期:2016-12-06 修回日期:2017-02-15 出版日期:2017-07-21 发布日期:2017-07-21
作者简介:史洪亮(1976-),男,成都理工大学在读博士研究生,研究方向为非常规油气地质。地址:(610000)四川省成都市高新区吉泰路688号。Email:9878192@qq.com。
基金资助:
国家重大科技专项“四川盆地碎屑岩层系大中型油气田形成规律与勘探方向”（编号：2011ZX05002-004）资助

Characteristics and controlling factors of tight sandstone and shale reservoirs of the fifth member of Xujiahe Formation in the Western Sichuan Depression

SHI Hongliang^1,2, YANG Keming², WANG Tong²

1. College of Energy Resources, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China;
2. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, Southwest Oil and Gas Company, Sinopec, Chengdu 610000, China

Received:2016-12-06 Revised:2017-02-15 Online:2017-07-21 Published:2017-07-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了弄清川西坳陷须五段致密砂岩与泥页岩储层发育特征及控制因素，并深化对非常规致密气储层的认识，利用岩心、铸体薄片、扫描电镜、X射线衍射及压汞等资料，对须五段储层岩石学、储集空间、物性等特征及其控制因素进行了研究。结果表明：须五段储层岩性大致分为泥页岩、粉砂岩和细砂岩三大类，分别占地层总厚度的56%， 19%和25%，砂岩普遍具有泥质杂基和岩屑含量高、长石含量低的特征，泥页岩中石英等脆性矿物含量较高；储集空间包括有机质孔、杂基微孔、粒内溶孔、粒间溶孔及微裂缝5类；细砂岩孔隙度和渗透率平均值分别为1.41%和0.1 mD，属于致密砂岩储层，主要为高能的水下分流河道微相沉积，粉砂岩孔隙度和渗透率平均值分别为1.52%和0.22 mD，总体均略高于细砂岩，泥页岩孔隙度和渗透率平均值分别为1.95%和0.068 mD，属于致密页岩储层；储层物性主要受到沉积条件、成岩作用和构造裂缝的多重控制，强烈的压实和压溶作用是导致砂岩致密的主要原因，次生孔隙主要由溶蚀作用形成，黏土矿物的转化及有机质热演化为泥页岩提供了大量储集空间，微裂缝极大地改善了储层渗透性。研究结果可为该区下一步油气勘探提供一定参考。

关键词: 地层岩性油藏, 勘探思路, 勘探发现, 勘探前景, 二连盆地

Abstract: The exploration of nonmarine unconventional tight gas is still in the early stage. In order to explore the research methods of tight gas in nonmarine shale sequence,the data of cores,cast thin sections, scanning electron microscope, X-ray diffraction and mercury injection,were used to study the petrology,reservoir space, physical properties and main controlling factors of the fifth member of Xujiahe Formation in the Western Sichuan Depression. The results show that the lithology was composed of three types:shale(56%),siltstone(25%)and fine sandstone(19%). There are high content of matrix and debris, low content of feldspar in sandstone,and high content of quartz mineral in shale. The reservoir spaces include organic pores,mixed matrix pores and intragranular dissolved pores,intergranular dissolved pores and microfractures. The average porosity and permeability of sandstone are 1.41% and 0.1 mD,respectively,so it belongs to tight sandstone reservoir,and mainly in high power subaqueous distributary channel. The average porosity and permeability of siltstone are 1.41% and 0.1 mD,respectively,and the average porosity and permeability of shale reservoir are 1.95% and 0.068 mD,respectively. The reservoir properties are mainly controlled by deposition conditions, diagenesis and structural fracture. Strong compaction and pressure dissolution are the main factors leading to the tightness of sandstone. Secondary pores are mainly formed by dissolution. The transformation of clay minerals and the thermal evolution of organic matter provide a large amount of reservoir spaces for shale,and microfracture greatly improves the reservoir permeability. The results can provide a reference for tight gas exploration in this area.

Key words: stratigraphic-lithologic reservoirs, exploration thought, exploration discovery, exploration prospects, Erlian Basin

中图分类号:

TE122.2

史洪亮, 杨克明, 王同. 川西坳陷须五段致密砂岩与泥页岩储层特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(4): 38–46.

SHI Hongliang, YANG Keming, WANG Tong. Characteristics and controlling factors of tight sandstone and shale reservoirs of the fifth member of Xujiahe Formation in the Western Sichuan Depression[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(4): 38–46.

参考文献

[1] 谢刚平, 叶素娟, 田苗.川西坳陷致密砂岩气藏勘探开发实践新认识.天然气工业, 2014, 34(1):44-53. XIE G P, YE S J, TIAN M. New understanding of exploration and development practices in tight sandstone gas reservoirs in Western Sichuan Depression. Natural Gas Industry, 2014, 34(1):44-53.
[2] 盘昌林, 刘树根, 马永生, 等.川东北须家河组储层特征及主控因素.西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 33(3):27-34. PAN C L, LIU S G, MA Y S, et al. Reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors the Xujiahe Formation in the northeastern Sichuan Basin. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2011, 33(3):27-34.
[3] 贾承造, 郑民, 张永峰. 中国非常规油气资源与勘探开发前景.石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(2):129-136. JIA C Z, ZHENG M, ZHANG Y F. Unconventional hydrocarbon resources in China and the prospect of exploration and development. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(2):129-136.
[4] 陈刚, 徐双辉, 陈洪德, 等.川西-川北地区T₃x⁵页岩气成藏地质条件.成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 41(1):8-17. CHEN G, XU S H, CHEN H D, et al. Pooling geological conditions of shale gas in T₃x⁵ of west Sichuan-north Sichuan, China. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition), 2014, 41(1):8-17.
[5] 李伟, 邹才能, 杨金利, 等.四川盆地上三叠统须家河组气藏类型与富集高产主控因素.沉积学报, 2010, 28(5):1037-1045. LI W, ZOU C N, YANG J L, et al. Types and controlling factors of accumulation and high productivity in the Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation gas reservoirs, Sichuan Basin. Acta Sedimentogica Sinica, 2010, 28(5):1037-1045.
[6] 陈磊, 姜振学, 邢金艳, 等.川西坳陷新页HF-1井须五段泥页岩吸附气含量主控因素及其定量预测模型.现代地质, 2014, 28(4):824-831. CHEN L, JIANG Z X, XING J Y, et al. Main controlling factors and prediction model of absorbed gas content in the fifth member of Xujiahe Formation from well Xinye HF-1, Western Sichuan Depression. Geoscience, 2014, 28(4):824-831.
[7] 林小兵, 刘莉萍, 田景春, 等.川西坳陷中部须家河组五段致密砂岩储层特征及主控因素. 石油与天然气地质, 2014, 35(2):224-230. LIN X B, LIU L P, TIAN J C, et al. Characteristics and controlling factors of tight sandstone reservoirs in the 5th member of Xujiahe Formation in the central of Western Sichuan Depression. Oil & Gas Geology, 2014, 35(2):224-230.
[8] 赵艳, 吴胜和, 徐樟有, 等.川西新场气田上三叠统须家河组二段致密砂岩优质储层控制因素.中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 34(4):1-6. ZHAO Y, WU S H, XU Z Y, et al. Control factors of compacted high-quality sandstone reservoirs of member 2 of the Xujiahe Formation, the Upper Triassic in Xinchang gas field of Western Sichuan Depression. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science), 2010, 34(4):1-6.
[9] 曾小英, 张小青, 钟玉梅.川西坳陷中段须家河组四段钙屑砂岩气层的成因.沉积学报, 2007, 25(6):896-902. ZENG X Y, ZHANG X Q, ZHONG Y M, et al. Origin of calcarenaceous sandstone gas formation of the 4th member of Xujiahe Formation in the middle part of Western Sichuan Depression. Acta Sedimentogica Sinica, 2007, 25(6):896-902.
[10] 陈冬霞, 庞雄奇, 杨克明, 等.川西坳陷中段上三叠统须二段致密砂岩孔隙度演化史.吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2012, 42(增刊1):42-51. CHEN D X, PANG X Q, YANG K M, et al. Porosity evolution of tight sand of the second member of Xujiahe Formation of Upper Triassic, Western Sichuan Depression. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2012, 42(Suppl 1):42-51.
[11] 郭迎春, 庞雄奇, 陈冬霞, 等.川西坳陷中段陆相地层压力演化及其成藏意义.石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(4):426-433. GUO Y C, PANG X Q, CHEN D X, et al. Evolution of nonmarine formation pressure in the middle part of the Western Sichuan Depression and its significance for hydrocarbon accumulation. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(4):426-433.
[12] 刘四兵, 沈忠民, 吕正祥, 等.川西新场气田上三叠统须二、须四段相对优质储层成因差异性分析.吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(4):993-1001. LIU S B, SHEN Z M, LYU Z X, et al. Controlling factors divergence analysis of relative high quality reservoir of Upper Triassic in the 2nd and 4th member of Xujiahe Formation of Xinchang Gas Field in west Sichuan. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2015, 45(4):993-1001.
[13] 郑荣才, 李国晖, 雷光明, 等.四川盆地须家河组层序分析与地层对比.天然气工业, 2011, 31(6):12-20. ZHENG R C, LI G H, LEI G M, et al. Sequence analysis and stratigraphic correlation of the Xujiahe Formation in the Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Industry, 2011, 31(6):12-20.
[14] 郑荣才, 戴朝成, 朱如凯, 等.四川类前陆盆地须家河组层序-岩相古地理特征.地质论评, 2009, 55(4):484-495. ZHENG R C, DAI C C, ZHU R K, et al. Sequence based lithofacies and paleogeographic characteristics of Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Sichuan Basin. Geological Review, 2009, 55(4):484-495.
[15] 叶军, 曾华盛.川西须家河组泥页岩气成藏条件与勘探潜力. 天然气工业, 2008, 28(12):18-25. YE J, ZENG H S. Polling conditions and exploration prospect of shale gas in Xujiahe Formation in Western Sichuan Depression. Natural Gas Industry, 2008, 28(12):18-25.
[16] 陈冬霞, 谢明贤, 张晓鹏, 等.川西坳陷须五段陆相页岩气聚集条件分析.长江大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 10(26):5-7. CHEN D X, XIE M X, ZHANG X P, et al. Shale gas accumulation conditions and its exploration and development prospects of the 5th member of the Xujiahe Formation of Upper Triassic in the Western Sichuan Depression. Journal of Yangtze University(Science & Technology Edition), 2013, 10(26):5-7.
[17] 徐天吉, 闫丽丽, 程冰洁, 等.川西坳陷须五段页岩气藏地震各向异性.石油与天然气地质, 2015, 36(2):319-329. XU T J, YAN L L, CHENG B J, et al. Seismic anisotropy of shale gas reservoirs in the 5th member of the Xujiahe Formation in Western Depression of Sichuan Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 2015, 36(2):319-329.
[18] 张克银, 王莹.川西坳陷新场地区须家河组五段裂缝分布特征.石油天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报), 2014, 36(6):1-5. ZHANG K Y, WANG Y. Fracture distribution rules of the fifth member of Xujiahe Formation in Xinchang area of Western Sichuan Depression. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology(Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute), 2014, 36(6):1-5.
[19] 黄静, 李琦, 康元欣, 等.致密砂岩气储层微观孔隙及成岩作用特征——以川西新场地区须五段为例.岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(2):24-32. HUANG J, LI Q, KANG Y X, et al. Characteristics of micropores and diagenesis of tight sandstone reservoirs:a case study from the fifth member of Xujiahe Formation in Xinchang area, Western Sichuan Depression. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(2):24-32.
[20] 王志萍, 秦启荣, 王保全, 等. 四川盆地大邑地区须家河组裂缝成因探讨.岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(3):33-38. WANG Z P, QIN Q R, WANG B Q, et al. Fracture origin of the Xujiahe Formation in Dayi area, Sichuan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2012, 24(3):33-38.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

川西坳陷须五段致密砂岩与泥页岩储层特征及控制因素

Characteristics and controlling factors of tight sandstone and shale reservoirs of the fifth member of Xujiahe Formation in the Western Sichuan Depression

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	姚海鹏, 于东方, 李玲, 林海涛. 内蒙古地区典型煤储层吸附特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 1-8.
[2]	宁从前, 周明顺, 成捷, 苏芮, 郝鹏, 王敏, 潘景丽. 二维核磁共振测井在砂砾岩储层流体识别中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 267-274.
[3]	黄杰, 杜玉洪, 王红梅, 郭佳, 单晓琨, 苗雪, 钟新宇, 朱玉双. 特低渗储层微观孔隙结构与可动流体赋存特征——以二连盆地阿尔凹陷腾一下段储层为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5): 93-101.
[4]	山鑫杰, 王飞宇, 刘念, 冯伟平, 江涛, 杜喜, 程志强, 李思嘉, 李月. 二连盆地呼仁布其凹陷南洼下白垩统烃源岩分布特征与油源分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3): 104-114.
[5]	张以明, 陈树光, 崔永谦, 田建章, 王鑫, 王孟华. 二连盆地乌兰花凹陷安山岩岩相展布及储层预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(6): 1-9.
[6]	陈国文, 沈亚, 袁云超, 韩冰, 李艳明, 杨泰. 柴西南地区岩性油藏地震评价关键技术方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(5): 74-81.
[7]	魏巍, 朱筱敏, 朱世发, 何明薇, 吴健平, 王名巍. 阿南凹陷腾格尔组凝灰质混积岩岩相及储集空间特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(2): 68-76.
[8]	赵贤正, 王权, 淡伟宁, 王文英, 乔晓霞, 任春玲. 二连盆地白垩系地层岩性油藏的勘探发现及前景[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(2): 1-9.
[9]	肖阳, 张少华, 魏岩, 杨明慧, 陈玉婷, 潘娟. 二连盆地赛汉塔拉凹陷边界断裂构造特征及其控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(2): 44-50.
[10]	赵志刚, 王飞宇, 王洪波, 王名巍, 王浩, 蓝宝峰. 二连盆地赛汉塔拉凹陷烃源岩有机相与烃源灶[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(2): 28-35.
[11]	王浩, 王飞宇, 降栓奇, 吴忠, 邢雅文, 蓝宝峰. 二连盆地赛汉塔拉凹陷原油地球化学特征与油族划分[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(2): 36-43.
[12]	何明薇, 朱筱敏, 朱世发, 魏巍, 吴健平, 王名巍. 二连盆地额仁淖尔凹陷阿尔善组致密储层特征及成岩作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(2): 77-86.
[13]	王付斌，马超,安川. 南华北盆地通许地区上古生界天然气勘探前景[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(2): 33-40.
[14]	卢学军，高平，丁修建，陈哲龙，柳广弟. 二连盆地阿尔凹陷下白垩统烃源岩地球化学特征及油源对比[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(3): 101-108.
[15]	孔祥宇. 东非鲁武马盆地油气地质特征与勘探前景[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(3): 21-27.