岩性油气藏 ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (3): 146–157.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20240314

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

辽河坳陷清水洼陷古近系沙河街组深层烃源岩特征及油气成藏模式

朱康乐1,2,3, 高岗1,2, 杨光达4, 张东伟4, 张莉莉5, 朱毅秀1,2, 李婧6   

  1. 1. 中国石油大学(北京)地球科学学院, 北京 102249;
    2. 中国石油大学(北京)油气资源与探测国家重点实验室, 北京 102249;
    3. 中国石油长庆油田公司 第七采油厂, 西安 710018;
    4. 中国石油辽河油田公司 勘探开发研究院, 辽宁 盘锦 124010;
    5. 中国石油长庆油田公司 第八采油厂, 陕西 榆林, 718600;
    6. 中国石油玉门油田公司 勘探开发研究院, 甘肃 酒泉, 735000
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-24 修回日期:2022-10-03 出版日期:2024-05-01 发布日期:2024-04-30
  • 第一作者:朱康乐，男（1995—），硕士，工程师，主要从事油气成藏与分布规律方面的研究工作。地址:（710018）陕西省西安市高陵区崇杨路长庆产业园泾渭大厦 3 号楼。Email:zhukangleyx@163.com。
  • 通信作者: 高岗，男（1966—），博士，教授，主要从事油气地球化学、油气成藏与分布规律方面的教学与研究工作。Email:gaogang2819@sina.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技重大专项“渤海湾盆地北部油气富集规律与油气增储领域研究”（编号：2016ZX05006-005）资助。

Characteristics of deep source rocks and hydrocarbon accumulation model of Paleogene Shahejie Form ationin Qingshui subsag，Liaohe Depression

ZHU Kangle1,2,3, GAO Gang1,2, YANG Guangda4, ZHANG Dongwei4, ZHANG Lili5, ZHU Yixiu1,2, LI Jing6   

  1. 1. College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China;
    2. State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China;
    3. No. 7 Oil Production Plant, PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Xi'an 710018, China;
    4. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Liaohe Oilfield Company, Panjin 124010, Liaoning, China;
    5. No. 8 Oil Production Plant, PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Yulin 718600, Shaanxi, China;
    6. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Yumen Oilfield Company, Jiuquan 735000, Gansu, China
  • Received:2022-08-24 Revised:2022-10-03 Online:2024-05-01 Published:2024-04-30

PDF (PC)

266

摘要： 通过有机碳、岩石热解、氯仿沥青“A”、饱和烃色谱-质谱和流体包裹体等的分析，对辽河坳陷清水洼陷古近系沙河街组深层烃源岩特征和油气成藏模式进行了详细研究。研究结果表明：①辽河坳陷清水洼陷古近系沙河街组深层烃源岩主要发育在 E2s32亚段、E2s33亚段和 E2s4段，其中 E2s32亚段Ⅱ小层泥岩最为发育，主要为深灰色厚层泥岩，整体厚度约 170 m。②研究区深层烃源岩总有机碳质量分数平均可达1.60%，生烃潜量平均值为 2.82 mg/g；有机质类型以Ⅱ1—Ⅲ型为主，主要为浮游植物与高等植物混合贡献，为弱氧化—弱还原的湖相咸水沉积环境；烃源岩有机质丰度为 0.5%~1.5%，普遍达到大量生烃阶段，部分已达到高成熟演化阶段。③研究区深层烃源岩在距今 38 Ma 时进入生油窗，距今 20 Ma 时开始生成天然气；流体包裹体显示研究区存在 2 期油气充注，分别为 38~26 Ma 和 20 Ma~现今，与生烃演化史匹配。

关键词: 烃源岩地球化学特征, 生物标志化合物, 流体包裹体, 咸水湖, 成藏模式, 沙河街组, 古近系, 清水洼陷, 辽河坳陷

Abstract: Based on the analysis of organic carbon, rock pyrolysis, chloroform bitumen“A”, saturated hydro‐carbon chromatography-mass spectrometry and fluid inclusions, the characteristics of deep source rocks and hydrocarbon accumulation model of Paleogene Shahejie Formation in Qingshui subsag of Liaohe Depression were analyzed. The results show that:（1）The deep source rocks of Paleogene Shahejie Formation in Qingshui subsag are mainly developed in E2s32 submember, E2s33 submember and E2s4 member, mudstone of sublayerⅡ of E2s32 submember is most developed, mainly dark gray thick mudstone, with an overall thickness of about 170 m.（2）The average TOC content of the deep source rocks in the study area can reach 1.60%, and the average hydrocarbon generation potential is 2.82 mg/g. The organic matters are mainly type Ⅱ1-Ⅲ, mainly contributed by the mixing of phytoplankton and higher plants, and are in a weakly oxidizing-weakly reducing lacustrine saline water sedimentary environment. With Ro value ranging from 0.5% to 1.5%, the source rocks have generally reached the stage of massive hydrocarbon generation, and some have reached the stage of highly matured evolution.（3）The deep source rocks in the study area entered the oil-generating window at 38 Ma, and a large amount of natural gas began to be generated at 20 Ma. Fluid inclusions show that there are two stages of oil and gas charging in the study area, namely 38-26 Ma and 20 Ma to present, matching the evolution history of hydrocarbon generation.

Key words: geochemical characteristics of source rocks, biomarker, fluid inclusion, saltwater lake, accumulation model, Shahejie Formation, Paleogene, Qingshui subsag, Liaohe Dep

中图分类号: 

  • TE357.4
[1] 梁明亮,王作栋,郑建京,等. 辽河断陷烃源岩有机地球化学特征[J]. 岩性油气藏,2014,26(4):110-116. LIANG Mingliang,WANG Zuodong,ZHENG Jianjing,et al. Organic geochemistry characteristics of source rocks in Liaohe Depression[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2014,26(4):110-116.
[2] 李龙,李渔刚,韩东. 辽河坳陷清水洼陷深层油藏形成主控因素研究与勘探实践[J]. 石油科技论坛,2022,41(2):1-8. LI Long,LI Yugang,HAN Dong. Study of main factors controlling deep-layer reservoir and exploration practice in Qingshui Sag of Liaohe Depression[J]. Petroleum Science and Technology Forum,2022,41(2):1-8.
[3] 胡英杰,王延山,黄双泉,等. 辽河坳陷石油地质条件、资源潜力及勘探方向[J]. 海相油气地质,2019,24(2):43-54. HU Yingjie,WANG Yanshan,HUANG Shuangquan,et al. The geological conditions,resource potential,and exploration direction of oil in Liaohe Depression[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2019,24(2):43-54.
[4] 谢武仁,牛嘉玉,王洪亮,等. 辽河西斜坡鸳鸯沟地区岩性油气藏研究[J]. 岩性油气藏,2008,20(4):75-79. XIE Wuren,NIU Jiayu,WANG Hongliang,et al. Study on lithologic reservoirs in Yuanyanggou area of Liaohe Depression[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2008,20(4):75-79.
[5] 刘立峰,姜振学,周新茂,等. 烃源岩生烃潜力恢复与排烃特征分析:以辽河西部凹陷古近系烃源岩为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2010,37(3):378-384. LIU Lifeng,JIANG Zhenxue,ZHOU Xinmao,et al. Hydrocarbon generation potential restoration and expulsion:Taking Paleocene source rock in the western sag of Liaohe Depression as an example[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2010, 37(3):378-384.
[6] 李琳,任作伟,孙洪斌. 辽河盆地西部凹陷深层石油地质综合评价[J]. 石油学报,1999,20(6):9-15. LI Lin,REN Zuowei,SUN Hongbin. An integrated evaluation on petroleum geology of the deep reservoirs in the west sag, Liaohe Basin,China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,1999,20(6):9-15.
[7] 惠沙沙,庞雄奇,柳广弟,等.辽河西部凹陷沙河街组烃源岩特征及油源精细对比[J].地球科学,2023,48(8):3081-3098. HUI Shasha,PANG Xiongqi,LIU Guangdi,et al. Characteristics of Paleogene source rocks and fine oil-source correlation in Liaohe Western Depression[J]. Earth Science,2023,48(8):3081- 3098.
[8] 张东伟. 辽河西部凹陷南部深层天然气勘探潜力[J]. 科学技术与工程,2019,19(16):51-63. ZHANG Dongwei. Exploration potential of deep nature gas in the south of western sag,Liaohe Depression[J]. Science Technology and Engineering,2019,19(16):51-63.
[9] 郭永强,刘洛夫. 辽河西部凹陷沙三段岩性油气藏主控因素研究[J]. 岩性油气藏,2009,21(2):19-23. GUO Yongqiang,LIU Luofu. Controlling factors of lithologic reservoirs of Sha 3 member in West Sag of Liaohe Depression[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2009,21(2):19-23.
[10] 周旭红,李军,王延山,等. 辽河坳陷陆上深层天然气勘探潜力研究[J].岩性油气藏,2011,23(3):23-28. ZHOU Xuhong,LI Jun,WANG Yanshan,et al. Study on exploration potential of deep natural gas in Liaohe Depression[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2011,23(3):23-28.
[11] 谢玉华,朱筱敏,赵坤. 辽河西部凹陷古近系层序地层格架[J]. 科技导报,2010,28(6):58-64. XIE Yuhua,ZHU Xiaomin,ZHAO Kun. Sequence-stratigraphic framework on Paleogene of the Liaohe Western Depression[J]. Science & Technology Review,2010,28(6):58-64.
[12] 冯有良,鲁卫华,门相勇. 辽河西部凹陷古近系层序地层与地层岩性油气藏预测[J]. 沉积学报,2009,27(1):57-63. FENG Youliang,LU Weihua,MEN Xiangyong. Eogene sequence stratigraphy and stratigraphy and lithologic reservoirs prediction in Liaohe West Depression[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2009,27(1):57-63.
[13] 漆家福,张一伟,陆克政,等. 渤海湾盆地新生代构造演化[J]. 石油大学学报(自然科学版),1995,19(增刊1):1-6. QI Jiafu,ZHANG Yiwei,LU Kezheng,et al. Cenozoic tectonic evolution in Bohai Bay Basin Province[J]. Journal of Petroleum University(Edition of Natural Science),1995,19(Suppl 1):1-6.
[14] 侯贵廷,钱祥麟,蔡东升. 渤海湾盆地中、新生代构造演化研究[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版),2001,37(6):845-851. HOU Guiting,QIAN Xianglin,CAI Dongsheng. The tectonic evolution of Bohai Basin in Mesozoic and Cenozoic time[J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis,2001,37(6):845-851.
[15] 孙洪斌,张凤莲. 辽河坳陷古近系构造-沉积演化特征[J]. 岩性油气藏,2008,20(2):60-65. SUN Hongbin,ZHANG Fenglian. Structural-sedimentary evolution characteristics of Paleogene in Liaohe Depression[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2008,20(2):60-65.
[16] 李宏伟,许坤. 郯庐断裂走滑活动与辽河盆地构造古地理格局[J].地学前缘,2001,8(4):467-470. LI Hongwei,XU Kun. The dextral strike-slip faulting of Tan-Lu fault zone and the structural oil fields distribution in Liaohe Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers,2001,8(4):467-470.
[17] 于兴河,张道建,郜建军,等. 辽河油田东、西部凹陷深层沙河街组沉积相模式[J].古地理学报,1999,1(3):40-49. YU Xinghe,ZHANG Daojian,GAO Jianjun,et al. Depositional facies and modesl of deep burial strara of the Shahejie Formation in the eastern and western depressions of Liaohe Oil field[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography,1999,1(3):40-49.
[18] 张震,鲍志东,童亨茂,等. 辽河断陷西部凹陷沙三段沉积相及相模式[J]. 高校地质学报,2009,15(3):387-397. ZHANG Zhen,BAO Zhidong,TONG Hengmao,et al. Sedimentary facies and facies model of the 3rd member of Shahejie Formation in the western sag,Liaohe fault Basin[J]. Geological Journal of Chinese Universities,2009,15(3):387-397.
[19] 赵青峰,张建国,康文君,等. 辽河坳陷西部凹陷沙四上亚段震积岩特征及地质意义[J].岩性油气藏,2019,31(5):24-33. ZHAO Qingfeng,ZHANG Jianguo,KANG Wenjun,et al. Characteristics of seismites and their geological significance of the upper fourth member of Shahejie Formation in western sag,Liaohe Depression[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2019,31(5):24-33.
[20] 廖兴明,姚继峰,于天欣,等. 辽河盆地构造演化与油气[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社,1996:1-85. LIAO Xingming,YAO Jifeng,YU Tianxin,et al. Structural evolution and oil and gas in the Liaohe Basin[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1996:1-85.
[21] 徐锐. 清水洼陷断裂特征及其对油气成藏的控制作用[D]. 大庆:东北石油大学,2018. XU Rui. Qingshui Sag faults'characteristics and its controlling role in oil & gas[D]. Daqing:Northeast Petroleum University, 2018.
[22] 李明刚,漆家福,童亨茂,等. 辽河西部凹陷新生代断裂构造特征与油气成藏[J].石油勘探与开发,2010,37(3):281-288. LI Minggang,QI Jiafu,TONG Hengmao,et al.Cenozoic fault structure and hydrocarbon accumulation in western sag,Liaohe Depression[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2010, 37(3):281-288.
[23] 祝厚勤,刘平兰,庞雄奇,等. 生烃潜力法研究烃源岩排烃特征的原理及应用[J]. 中国石油勘探,2008,16(3):5-9. ZHU Houqin,LIU Pinglan,PANG Xiongqi,et al. Principle of hydrocarbon-generation potential method studying hydrocarbon expulsion characteristics of source rocks and its application[J]. China Petroleum Exploration,2008,16(3):5-9.
[24] 陈建平,孙永革,钟宁宁,等. 地质条件下湖相烃源岩生排烃效率与模式[J]. 地质学报,2014,88(11):2005-2032. CHEN Jianping,SUN Yongge,ZHONG Ningning,et al. The efficiency and model of petroleum exploration from the lacustrine source rocks within geological frame[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica,2014,88(11):2005-2032.
[25] 蔡希源. 湖相烃源岩生排烃机制及生排烃效率差异性:以渤海湾盆地东营凹陷为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2012,33(3):329-334. CAI Xiyuan. Hydrocarbon generation-expulsion mechanisms and efficiencies of lacustrine source rocks:A case study from the Dongying sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2012,33(3):329-334.
[26] 黄第藩,李晋超,张大江. 干酪根的类型及其分类参数的有效性、局限性和相关性[J].沉积学报,1984,2(3):18-33. HUANG Difan,LI Jinchao,ZHANG Dajiang. Kerogen types and study on effectiveness,limitation and interrelation of their identification parameters[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1984,2(3):18-33.
[27] PETERS K E,WALTERS C C,MORWAN J M. 生物标志化合物指南[M]. 张水昌,振西生,译. 北京:石油工业出版社, 2011:1-347. PETERS K E,WALTERS C C,MORWAN J M. Guide to biomarker compounds[M]. ZHANG Shuichang,ZHEN Xisheng, Trans. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2011:1-347.
[28] SHANMUGAM G. Significance of coniferous rain forests and related organic matter in generating commercial quantities of oil, Gippsland Basin[J]. AAPG Bulletin,1985,69(8):1241-1254.
[29] GOOSSENS H,DELEEUW J W,SCHENCK PA,et al. Tocopherols as likely precursors of pristane in ancient sediments and crude oils[J]. Nature,1984,312(5993):440-442.
[30] GAO Gang,XU Xinde,QU Tong,et al. Petroleum origins and accumulation patterns in the Weixinan Sag in the Beibu Gulf Basin,using subsag B as an example[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica (English Edition),2020,94(5):1515-1530.
[31] ROWLAND S J. Production of acyclic isoprenoid hydrocarbons by laboratory maturation of methanogenic bacteria[J]. Organic Geochemistry,1990,15(1):9-16.
[32] 彭兴芳,李周波. 生物标志化合物在石油地质中的应用[J]. 资源环境与工程,2006,20(3):279-283. PENG Xingfang,LI Zhoubo. The application of biomarker in the research of petroleum geology[J]. Resources Environment & Engineering,2006,20(3):279-283.
[33] 傅家谟,盛国英,许家友,等. 应用生物标志化合物参数判识古沉积环境[J]. 地球化学,1991,10(1):1-12. FU Jiamo,SHENG Guoying,XU Jiayou,et al. Application of biomarker compounds in assessment of paleoenvironments of Chinese terrestrial sediments[J]. Geochimica,1991,10(1):1-12.
[34] PARKS L W,ANDING C,OURISSON G. Sterol transmethylation during aerobic adaptation of yeast[J]. European Journal of Biochemistry,2010,43(3):451-458.
[35] ADEGOKE A K,ABDULLAH W H,HAKIMI M H,et al. Geochemical characterisation of Fika Formation in the Chad (Bornu)Basin,northeastern Nigeria:Implications for depositional environment and tectonic setting[J]. Applied Geochemisty,2014,43:1-12.
[36] 任战利,田涛,李进步,等. 沉积盆地热演化史研究方法与叠合盆地热演化史恢复研究进展[J]. 地球科学与环境学报, 2014,36(3):1-21. REN Zhanli,TIAN Tao,LI Jinbu,et al. Review on methods of thermal evolution history in discipline basins and thermal evolution history reconstruction of supermposed basins[J]. Journal of Earth Science and Environment,2014,36(3):1-21.
[37] 徐景祯,王家亮. 沉积盆地热史恢复的一种优化方法[J]. 地学前缘,2000,7(4):420. XU Jingzhen,WANG Jialiang. An optimization method for thermal history restoration of sedimentary basins[J]. Earth Science Frontiers,2000,7(4):420.
[38] 欧光习,李林强,孙玉梅. 沉积盆地流体包裹体研究的理论与实践[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报,2006,25(1):1-11. OU Guangxi,LI Linqiang,SUN Yumei. Theory and application of the fluid inclusion research on the sedimentary Basins[J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy,Petrology and Geochemistry,2006, 25(1):1-11.
[39] 卢焕章,郭迪江. 流体包裹体研究的进展和方向[J].地质论评,2000,46(4):385-392. LU Huanzhang,GUO Dijiang. Progress and trends of research on fluid inclusions[J]. Geological Review,2000,46(4):385-392.
[1] 程焱, 王波, 张铜耀, 齐玉民, 杨纪磊, 郝鹏, 李阔, 王晓东. 渤中凹陷渤中A-2区新近系明化镇组岩性油气藏油气运移特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 46-55.
[2] 黄向胜, 闫琢玉, 张东峰, 黄合庭, 罗程飞. 琼东南盆地Ⅱ号断裂带新生界多期热流体活动与天然气运聚特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 67-76.
[3] 周自强, 朱正平, 潘仁芳, 董於, 金吉能. 基于波形相控反演的致密砂岩储层模拟预测方法——以黄骅坳陷沧东凹陷南部古近系孔二段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 77-86.
[4] 张磊, 李莎, 罗波波, 吕伯强, 谢敏, 陈新平, 陈冬霞, 邓彩云. 东濮凹陷北部古近系沙三段超压岩性油气藏成藏机理[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 57-70.
[5] 董柔, 李坤, 殷际航, 薛煜恒, 江涛, 徐国盛. 渤东凹陷新生代伸展-走滑叠合断裂时空差异演化模式及控藏效应[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 106-116.
[6] 西智博, 廖建平, 高荣锦, 周晓龙, 雷文文. 辽河坳陷陈家断裂带北部构造演化解析及油气成藏[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 127-136.
[7] 冯斌, 黄晓波, 何幼斌, 李华, 罗进雄, 李涛, 周晓光. 渤海湾盆地庙西北地区古近系沙河街组三段源-汇系统重建[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 84-95.
[8] 方旭庆, 钟骑, 张建国, 李军亮, 孟涛, 姜在兴, 赵海波. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷古近系沙三下亚段旋回地层学分析及地层划分[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 19-30.
[9] 刘仁静, 陆文明. 断块油藏注采耦合提高采收率机理及矿场实践[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 180-188.
[10] 王亚, 刘宗宾, 路研, 王永平, 刘超. 基于SSOM的流动单元划分方法及生产应用——以渤海湾盆地F油田古近系沙三中亚段湖底浊积水道为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 160-169.
[11] 牛成民, 惠冠洲, 杜晓峰, 官大勇, 王冰洁, 王启明, 张宏国. 辽中凹陷西斜坡古近系东三段湖底扇发育模式及大油田发现[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 33-42.
[12] 马文杰, 王景春, 田作基, 马中振, 万学鹏, 林金逞, 许翔麟, 周玉冰. 南美洲Oriente盆地斜坡带W区块构造-岩性复合油藏成藏模式及有利区预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 29-36.
[13] 马峰, 庞文珠, 赵文光, 张斌, 赵艳军, 薛罗, 郑茜, 陈彬滔. 南苏丹境内裂谷盆地源上构造-岩性油藏成藏主控因素与成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 92-105.
[14] 李盛谦, 曾溅辉, 刘亚洲, 李淼, 焦盼盼. 东海盆地西湖凹陷孔雀亭地区古近系平湖组储层成岩作用及孔隙演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 49-61.
[15] 魏全超, 李小佳, 李峰, 郝景宇, 邓双林, 吴娟, 邓宾, 王道军. 四川盆地米仓山前缘旺苍地区下寒武统筇竹寺组裂缝脉体发育特征及意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 62-70.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 魏钦廉, 郑荣才, 肖玲, 王成玉, 牛小兵. 鄂尔多斯盆地吴旗地区长6 储层特征及影响因素分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 45 -50 .
[2] 王东琪, 殷代印. 水驱油藏相对渗透率曲线经验公式研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(3): 159 -164 .
[3] 李云，时志强. 四川盆地中部须家河组致密砂岩储层流体包裹体研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 27 -32 .
[4] 蒋韧，樊太亮，徐守礼. 地震地貌学概念与分析技术[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 33 -38 .
[5] 邹明亮，黄思静，胡作维，冯文立，刘昊年. 西湖凹陷平湖组砂岩中碳酸盐胶结物形成机制及其对储层质量的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 47 -52 .
[6] 王冰洁，何生，倪军娥，方度. 板桥凹陷钱圈地区主干断裂活动性分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 75 -82 .
[7] 陈振标，张超谟，张占松，令狐松，孙宝佃. 利用NMRT2谱分布研究储层岩石孔隙分形结构[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 105 -110 .
[8] 张厚福，徐兆辉. 从油气藏研究的历史论地层-岩性油气藏勘探[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 114 -123 .
[9] 张　霞. 勘探创造力的培养[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 16 -20 .
[10] 杨午阳, 杨文采, 刘全新, 王西文. 三维F-X域粘弹性波动方程保幅偏移方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 86 -91 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发