黔北凤冈地区下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩孔隙结构特征及油气地质意义

doi:10.12108/yxyqc.20240413

岩性油气藏 ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4): 147–158.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20240413

黔北凤冈地区下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩孔隙结构特征及油气地质意义

朱彪^1,2, 邹妞妞^1,2, 张大权^3,4, 杜威^3,4, 陈祎^3,4

1. 贵州大学资源与环境工程学院, 贵阳 550025;
2. 贵州大学喀斯特地质资源与环境教育部重点实验室, 贵阳 550025;
3. 自然资源部复杂构造区非常规天然气评价与开发重点实验室, 贵阳 550004;
4. 贵州省油气勘查开发工程研究院, 贵阳 550000

收稿日期:2023-10-07 修回日期:2023-12-16 出版日期:2024-07-01 发布日期:2024-07-04
第一作者:朱彪（1995—），男，在读硕士研究生，研究方向为非常规油气储层。地址：（550025）贵州省贵阳市花溪区贵大新校区资环楼。Email：1059882976@qq.com。
通信作者: 邹妞妞（1989—），博士，副教授，主要从事沉积学、非常规油气方面的研究。Email：niuniu9728@126.com。
基金资助:
贵州省科技计划项目“黔北下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩裂缝与页岩气控制作用”（编号：黔科合基础-ZK［2023］一般 192）、贵州省找矿突破战略行动重大协同创新项目“贵州省页岩气效益开发关键技术及工程试验”（编号：黔科合战略找矿［2022］ZD005）和贵州省科技厅计划项目“黔北地区下寒武统牛蹄塘页岩孔隙连通性流体示踪研究”（编号：黔科合基础［2019］1119）联合资助。

Characteristics of shale pore structure and its oil and gas geological significance of Lower Cambrian Niutitang Formation in Fenggang area，northern Guizhou

ZHU Biao^1,2, ZOU Niuniu^1,2, ZHANG Daquan^3,4, DU Wei^3,4, CHEN Yi^3,4

1. College of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Karst Georesources and Environment, Ministry of Education, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China;
3. Key Laboratory of Unconventional Natural Gas Evaluation and Development in Complex Tectonic Areas, Ministry of Natural Resources, Guiyang 550004, China;
4. Guizhou Engineering Research Institute of Oil & Gas Exploration and Development, Guiyang 550000, China

Received:2023-10-07 Revised:2023-12-16 Online:2024-07-01 Published:2024-07-04

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 利用全岩 X 射线衍射（XRD）、场发射扫描电镜（FE-SEM）、核磁共振（NMR）和低温氮气吸附实验方法多尺度定性-定量表征黔北凤冈地区永凤 1 井下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩孔隙结构特征，并探讨其影响因素与油气地质意义。研究结果表明：①黔北凤冈地区下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩矿物组成以石英、长石与黏土矿物为主，其次为碳酸盐矿物与黄铁矿；孔隙类型主要为有机质孔、粒间孔、粒内孔与微裂缝，有机质孔与黏土矿物粒间孔最为发育。②研究区牛蹄塘组页岩比表面积平均值为 9.536 6 m²/g，总孔体积平均值为 0.009 02 cm³/g，介孔体积平均值为 0.007 95 cm³/g，宏孔体积为 0.000 37～0.004 58 cm³/g，平均为 0.001 07 cm³/g，平均孔径为 3.381～5.947 nm，介孔最为发育。页岩孔体积主要由介孔与宏孔贡献，比表面积主要由微孔与介孔贡献，微孔与介孔、宏孔连通性相对较差，介孔与宏孔连通性较好，孔隙形态主要为墨水瓶形、圆柱形和裂缝形。③研究区牛蹄塘组孔隙结构主要受 TOC、黏土矿物与脆性矿物影响，TOC 与黏土矿物对比表面积、总孔体积、介孔体积及孔隙度具有积极影响，脆性矿物则对比表面积、孔隙度、介孔体积具有消极影响。

关键词: 孔隙结构, 有机质孔, 黏土矿物粒间孔, 介孔, 宏孔, 页岩, 牛蹄塘组, 下寒武统, 永凤1井, 黔北凤冈地区

Abstract: Using whole rock X-ray diffraction（XRD），field emission scanning electron microscopy（FE-SEM） nuclear magnetic resonance（NMR），and low-temperature nitrogen adsorption experimental methods，multi-scale qualitative and quantitative characterization of the pore structure characteristics of shale of Cambrian Niutitang Formation of well Yongfeng 1 in Fenggang area of northern Guizhou was carried out，and its influencing factors and oil and gas geological significance were discussed. The results show that：（1）The shale minerals of Lower Cambrian Niutitang Formation in Fenggang area of northern Guizhou are mainly composed of quartz，feldspar and clay minerals，followed by carbonate minerals and pyrite. The pore types are mainly organic matter pores，intergranular pores，intragranular pores and micro-cracks，with organic matter pores and clay mineral intergranular pores being the most developed.（2）The average specific surface area of the shale of Niutitang Formation in the study area is 9.536 6 m²/g. The average total pore volume is 0.009 02 cm³/g，the average mesopore volume is 0.007 95 cm³/g，the macropore volume is 0.000 37-0.004 58 cm³/g，with an average value of 0.001 07 cm³/g，and the average pore size is 3.381-5.947 nm. The mesopores are the most developed. The pore volume of shale is mainly contributed by mesopores and macropores，and the specific surface area is mainly contributed by micropores and mesopores. The connectivity between micropores and mesopores and macropores is relatively poor， and the connectivity between mesopores and macropores is good. The pore shapes are mainly ink-bottle shaped， cylindrical shaped，and fracture shaped.（3）TOC，clay minerals and brittle minerals are the main factors controlling the pore structure of shale of Niutitang Formation in the study area. TOC and clay minerals have positive effects on specific surface area，total pore volume，mesopore volume and porosity，while brittle minerals have negative effects on specific surface area，porosity and mesopore volume.

Key words: pore structure, organic matter pore, clay mineral intergranular pore, mesopore, macropore, shale, Niutitang Formation, Lower Cambrian, well Yongfeng 1, Fenggang area in northern Guizhou

中图分类号:

TE122.2+3

朱彪, 邹妞妞, 张大权, 杜威, 陈祎. 黔北凤冈地区下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩孔隙结构特征及油气地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 147–158.

ZHU Biao, ZOU Niuniu, ZHANG Daquan, DU Wei, CHEN Yi. Characteristics of shale pore structure and its oil and gas geological significance of Lower Cambrian Niutitang Formation in Fenggang area，northern Guizhou[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(4): 147–158.

参考文献

[1] 邹才能,潘松圻,荆振华,等.页岩油气革命及影响[J].石油学报,2020,41(1):1-12. ZOU Caineng,PAN Songqi,JING Zhenhua,et al. Shale oil and gas revolution and its impact[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2020,41(1):1-12.
[2] 邹才能,赵群,丛连铸,等.中国页岩气开发进展、潜力及前景[J].天然气工业,2021,41(1):1-14. ZOU Caineng,ZHAO Qun,CONG Lianzhu,et al. Development progress,potential and prospect of shale gas in China[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2021,41(1):1-14.
[3] 卢树藩,何犇,陈祎,等.贵州复杂构造背景下的页岩气勘查存在问题探讨[J].贵州地质,2023,40(1):1-12. LU Shufan,HE Ben,CHEN Yi,et al.Discussion on problems of shale gas exploration under complex background in Guizhou[J]. Guizhou Geology,2023,40(1):1-12.
[4] 王丽波,久凯,曾维特,等.上扬子黔北地区下寒武统海相黑色泥页岩特征及页岩气远景区评价[J].岩石学报,2013,29(9):3263-3278. WANG Libo,JIU Kai,ZENG Weite,et al. Characteristics of Lower Cambrian marine black shales and evaluation of shale gas prospective area in Qianbei area,Upper Yangtze region[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica,2013,29(9):3263-3278.
[5] 罗健,罗小平,陈安清,等.川南-黔北地区下寒武统烃源岩发育分布特征及控制因素[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2020,47(5):590-603. LUO Jian,LUO Xiaoping,CHEN Anqing,et al. Development and distribution characteristics and controlling factors of hydrocarbon source rocks in southern Sichuan-northern Guizhou, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science&Technology Edition),2020,47(5):590-603.
[6] 冷济高,龚大建,李飞,等.黔东北地区牛蹄塘组页岩气勘探前景分析[J].地学前缘,2016,23(2):29-38. LENG Jigao,GONG Dajian,LI Fei,et al.Analyses on the shale gas exploration prospect of the Niutitang Formation in northeastern Guizhou area[J]. Earth Science Frontiers,2016,23(2):29-38.
[7] 刘瑞崟,陈庆刚,王甘露,等.黔北地区下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩气层封闭性分析[J].煤炭技术,2016,35(10):111-113. LIU Ruiyin,CHEN Qinggang,WANG Ganlu,et al. Analysis of sealing property of Lower Cambrian Niutitang shale in northern area of Guizhou[J]. Coal Technology,2016,35(10):111-113.
[8] 何建华,丁文龙,付景龙,等.页岩微观孔隙成因类型研究[J].岩性油气藏,2014,26(5):30-35. HE Jianhua,DING Wenlong,FU Jinglong,et al.Study on genetic type of micropore in shale reservoir[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2014,26(5):30-35.
[9] 潘仁芳,龚琴,鄢杰,等.页岩气藏 "甜点" 构成要素及富气特征分析:以四川盆地长宁地区龙马溪组为例[J].天然气工业, 2016,36(3):7-13. PAN Renfang,GONG Qin,YAN Jie,et al.Elements and gas enrichment laws of sweet spots in shale gas reservoir:A case study of the Longmaxi Fm in Changning block,Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2016,36(3):7-13.
[10] 李希建,沈仲辉,李维维,等.黔北凤冈地区牛蹄塘组页岩气勘探与开发潜力[J].天然气工业,2016,36(12):72-79. LI Xijian,SHEN Zhonghui,LI Weiwei,et al. Exploration and development potential of Niutitang Fm shale gas in Fenggang area,North Guizhou[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2016,36(12):72-79.
[11] 宁凡,邹妞妞,张大权,等.黔北地区下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩特征研究[J].特种油气藏,2020,27(1):62-67. NING Fan,ZOU Niuniu,ZHANG Daquan,et al.Shale characteristics of the Lower Cambrian Niutitang Formation in northern Guizhou[J]. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs,2020,27(1):62-67.
[12] 叶亚培,唐书恒,郗兆栋,等.黔北地区牛蹄塘组页岩矿物组成特征与脆性评价[J].岩性油气藏,2018,30(4):62-71. YE Yapei,TANG Shuheng,XI Zhaodong,et al.Mineral compositions and brittleness evaluation of shale of Niutitang Formation in northern Guizhou[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2018,30(4):62-71.
[13] 夏鹏,付勇,杨镇,等.黔北镇远牛蹄塘组黑色页岩沉积环境与有机质富集关系[J].地质学报,2020,94(3):947-956. XIA Peng,FU Yong,YANG Zhen,et al. The relationship between sedimentary environment and organic matter accumulation in the Niutitang black shale in Zhenyuan,northern Guizhou[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2020,94(3):947-956.
[14] 付勇,周文喜,王华建,等.黔北下寒武统黑色岩系的沉积环境与地球化学响应[J].地质学报,2021,95(2):536-548. FU Yong,ZHOU Wenxi,WANG Huajian,et al. The relationship between environment and geochemical characteristics of black rock series of Lower Cambrian in northern Guizhou[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica,2021,95(2):536-548.
[15] 王濡岳,丁文龙,龚大建,等.渝东南-黔北地区下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩裂缝发育特征与主控因素[J].石油学报,2016,37(7):832-845. WANG Ruyue,DING Wenlong,GONG Dajian,et al.Development characteristics and major controlling factors of shale fractures in the Lower Cambrian Niutitang Formation,southeastern Chongqing-northern Guizhou area[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016, 37(7):832-845.
[16] 王濡岳,丁文龙,龚大建,等.黔北地区海相页岩气保存条件:以贵州岑巩区块下寒武统牛蹄塘组为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2016,37(1):45-55. WANG Ruyue,DING Wenlong,GONG Dajian,et al. Gas preservation conditions of marine shale in northern Guizhou area:A case study of the Lower Cambrian Niutitang Formation in the Cen'gong block,Guizhou Province[J]. Oil&Gas Geology, 2016,37(1):45-55.
[17] 曾维特,丁文龙,张金川,等.渝东南-黔北地区下古生界页岩非构造裂缝发育特征与主控因素[J].地球科学,2023,48(7):2652-2664. ZENG Weite,DING Wenlong,ZHANG Jinchuan,et al. Nontectonic fracture characteristics of Lower Paleozoic shale in southeast Chongqing and north Guizhou area (South China) and its main controlling factors[J]. Earth Sciences,2023,48(7):2652-2664.
[18] 戴传固,王雪华,陈建书,等.贵州省区域地质志[M].北京:地质出版社,1987:554-632. DAI Chuangu,WANG Xuehua,CHEN Jianshu,et al. Regional geology of Guizhou Province[M]. Beijing:Geological Publishing House,1987:554-632.
[19] 张权.黔北坳陷及周缘油气保存条件研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2016. ZHANG Quan.Research on the preservation conditions of Qianbei Depression and its margin[D]. Hangzhou:Zhejiang University, 2016.
[20] 田涛,付德亮,杨甫,等.米仓山-汉南隆起区牛蹄塘组页岩矿物组分与微观孔隙的关系[J].煤炭学报,2018,43(增刊1):236-244. TIAN Tao,FU Deliang,YANG Fu,et al. Relationship between mineral composition and micro-pores of Niutitang Formation shale in Micangshan-Hannan Uplift[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2018,43(Suppl 1):236-244.
[21] 李新景,吕宗刚,董大忠,等.北美页岩气资源形成的地质条件[J].天然气工业,2009,29(5):27-32. LI Xinjing,LYU Zonggang,DONG Dazhong,et al. Geologic controls on accumulation of shale gas in North America[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2009,29(5):27-32.
[22] SLATT R M,O'BRIEN N R. Pore types in the Barnett and Woodford gas shales:Contribution to understanding gas storage and migration pathways in fine-grained rocks[J]. AAPG Bulletin,2011,95(12):2017-2030.
[23] LOUKS R G,REED R M,RUPPEL S C,et al. Spectrum of pore types and network in mudrocks and a descriptive classification for matrix-related mudrock pores[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2012,96(6):1071-1098.
[24] ROUQUEROL J,AVNIR D,FAIRBRIDGE C W,et al. Recommendations for the characterization of porous solids[J]. Pure&Applied Chemistry,1994,66(8):1739-1758.
[25] 王朋飞,金璨,臧小鹏,等.渝东南地区海相页岩有机质孔隙发育特征及演化[J].岩性油气藏,2020,32(5):46-53. WANG Pengfei,JIN Can,ZANG Xiaopeng,et al. Development characteristics and evolution of organic matter pores of marine shale in southeastern Chongqing[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2020, 32(5):46-53.
[26] 吴陈君,刘新社,文志刚,等.黔北地区牛蹄塘组页岩有机质富集及有机质孔隙发育机制研究[J].地学前缘,2023,30(3):101-109. WU Chenjun,LIU Xinshe,WEN Zhigang,et al. Mechanism of organic matter enrichment and organic pore development in the Lower Cambrian Niutitang shales in northern Guizhou[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2023,30(3):101-109.
[27] XIAO Liang,ZOU Changchun,MAO Zhiqiang,et al. A new technique for synthetizing capillary pressure (PC) curves using NMR logs in tight gas sandstone reservoirs[J]. Jounal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2016,145:493-501.
[28] 孟昆,王胜建,薛宗安,等.利用核磁共振资料定量评价页岩孔隙结构[J].波谱学杂志,2021,38(2):215-226. MENG Kun,WANG Shengjian,XUE Zongan,et al. Quantitative evaluation of shale pore structure using nuclear magnetic resonance data[J]. Chinese Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 2021,38(2):215-226.
[29] 邵维志,丁娱娇,肖斐,等.利用T₂谱形态确定T₂截止值的方法探索[J].测井技术,2009,33(5):430-435. SHAO Weizhi,DING Yujiao,XIAO Fei,et al. On the method of determing T₂ cutoff value with the T₂ spectrum characteristics[J]. Well Logging Technology,2009,33(5):430-435.
[30] 周尚文,刘洪林,闫刚,等.中国南方海相页岩储层可动流体及T₂截止值核磁共振研究[J].石油与天然气地质,2016,37(4):612-616. ZHOU Shangwen,LIU Honglin,YAN Gang,et al. NMR research of movable fluid and T 2 cutoff of marine shale in South China[J]. Oil&Gas Geology,2016,37(4):612-616.
[31] TAN Maojin,Mao Keyu,SONG Xiaodong,et al. NMR petrophysical interpretation method of gas shale based on core NMR experiment[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2015,136:100-111.
[32] BENOIT V,MARC F,YANNICK S,et al. NMR relaxation of neritic carbonates:An integrated petrophysical and petrographical approach[J]. Journal of Applied Geophysics,2011,74:38-58.
[33] 曹淑慧,汪益宁,黄小娟,等.核磁共振T₂谱构建页岩储层孔隙结构研究:以张家界柑子坪地区下寒武统牛蹄塘组的页岩为例[J].复杂油气藏,2016,9(3):19-24. CAO Shuhui,WANG Yining,HUANG Xiaojuan,et al. Pore structure of shale reservoir built by NMR T₂ spectrum:Taking Niutitang shale of Lower Cambrian in Zhangjiajie Ganziping area as an example[J]. Complex Hydrocarbon Reservoirs,2016, 9(3):19-24.
[34] 于伟,刘莉君,高博,等.基于氮气吸附-核磁共振分析的煤气化细渣孔隙结构特征[J].燃料化学学报,2022,50(8):966-973. YU Wei,LIU Lijun,GAO Bo,et al. Pore structure of coal gasification fine slag based on nitrogen adsorption and nuclear magnetic resonance analysis[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology,2022,50(8):966-973.
[35] 宋泽章,阿比德·阿不拉,吕明阳,等.氮气吸附滞后回环定量分析及其在孔隙结构表征中的指示意义:以鄂尔多斯盆地上三叠统延长组7段为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2023,44(2):495-509. SONG Zezhang,ABIDE Abula,LYU Mingyang,et al. Quantitative analysis of nitrogen adsorption hysteresis loop and its indicative significance to pore structure characterization:A case study on the Upper Triassic Chang 7 member,Ordos Basin[J]. Oil&Gas Geology,2023,44(2):495-509.
[36] 龚小平,唐洪明,赵峰,等.四川盆地龙马溪组页岩储层孔隙结构的定量表征[J].岩性油气藏,2016,28(3):48-57. GONG Xiaoping,TANG Hongming,ZHAO Feng,et al. Quantitative characterization of pore structure in shale reservoir of Longmaxi Formation in Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2016,28(3):48-57.
[37] 朱炎铭,王阳,陈尚斌,等.页岩储层孔隙结构多尺度定性-定量综合表征:以上扬子海相龙马溪组为例[J].地学前缘, 2016,23(1):154-163. ZHU Yanming,WANG Yang,CHEN Shangbin,et al. Qualitativequantitative multiscale characterization of pore structures in shale reservoirs:A case study of Longmaxi Formation in the Upper Yangtze area[J]. Earth Science Frontiers,2016,23(1):154-163.
[38] 陈相霖,郭天旭,石砥石,等.陕南地区牛蹄塘组页岩孔隙结构特征及吸附能力[J].岩性油气藏,2019,31(5):52-60. CHEN Xianglin,GUO Tianxu,SHI Dishi,et al. Pore structure characteristics and adsorption capacity of Niutitang Formation shale in southern Shaanxi[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2019,31(5):52-60.
[39] 司陈洋,谭静强,王张虎,等.湘西地区寒武系牛蹄塘组页岩孔隙发育特征及影响因素[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2022,53(9):3738-3755. SI Chenyang,TAN Jingqiang,WANG Zhanghu,et al. Characteristics and influencing factors of shale pore development in Niutitang Formation of Cambrian,western Hunan[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology),2022, 53(9):3738-3755.
[40] 朱汉卿,贾爱林,位云生,等.基于氩气吸附的页岩纳米级孔隙结构特征[J].岩性油气藏,2018,30(2):77-84. ZHU Hanqing,JIA Ailin,WEI Yunsheng,et al. Nanopore structure characteristics of shale based on Ar adsorption[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2018,30(2):77-84.
[41] 文志刚,罗雨舒,刘江艳,等.陇东地区三叠系长7段页岩油储层孔隙结构特征及成因机制[J].岩性油气藏,2022,34(6):47-59. WEN Zhigang,LUO Yushu,LIU Jiangyan,et al. Pore structure characteristics and genetic mechanism of Triassic Chang 7 shale oil reservoir in Longdong area[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2022, 34(6):47-59.
[42] 王哲,李贤庆,祁帅,等.川南地区筇竹寺组页岩微观孔隙结构特征及其影响因素[J].高校地质学报,2018,24(2):273-284. WANG Zhe,LI Xianqing,QI Shuai,et al. Characteristics of microscopic pore structures and its influencing factors of the Qiongzhusi Formation shales in the southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Geological Journal of China Universities,2018,24(2):273-284.
[43] 杨博伟,石万忠,张晓明,等.黔南地区下石炭统打屋坝组页岩气储层孔隙结构特征及含气性评价[J].岩性油气藏,2024, 36(1):45-58. YANG Bowei,SHI Wanzhong,ZHANG Xiaoming,et al. Pore structure characteristics and gas-bearing properties of shale gas reservoirs of Lower Carboniferous Dawuba Formation in southern Guizhou[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2024,36(1):45-58.
[44] 何庆,何生,董田,等.鄂西下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩孔隙结构特征及影响因素[J].石油实验地质,2019,41(4):530-539. HE Qing,HE Sheng,DONG Tian,et al. Pore structure characteristics and controls of Lower Cambrian Niutitang Formation, western Hubei Province[J]. Petroleum Geology&Experiment, 2019,41(4):530-539.
[45] 熊健,罗丹序,刘向君,等.鄂尔多斯盆地延长组页岩孔隙结构特征及其控制因素[J].岩性油气藏,2016,28(2):16-23. XIONG Jian,LUO Danxu,LIU Xiangjun,et al. Characteristics and controlling factors of shale pore structure of Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2016,28(2):16-23.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

黔北凤冈地区下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩孔隙结构特征及油气地质意义

Characteristics of shale pore structure and its oil and gas geological significance of Lower Cambrian Niutitang Formation in Fenggang area，northern Guizhou

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	赵军, 李勇, 文晓峰, 徐文远, 焦世祥. 基于斑马算法优化支持向量回归机模型预测页岩地层压力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 12-22.
[2]	白玉彬, 李梦瑶, 朱涛, 赵靖舟, 任海姣, 吴伟涛, 吴和源. 玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组烃源岩地球化学特征及页岩油“甜点”评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 110-121.
[3]	洪智宾, 吴嘉, 方朋, 余进洋, 伍正宇, 于佳琦. 纳米限域下页岩中可溶有机质的非均质性及页岩油赋存状态[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 160-168.
[4]	王子昕, 柳广弟, 袁光杰, 杨恒林, 付利, 王元, 陈刚, 张恒. 鄂尔多斯盆地庆城地区三叠系长7段烃源岩特征及控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 133-144.
[5]	杨学锋, 赵圣贤, 刘勇, 刘绍军, 夏自强, 徐飞, 范存辉, 李雨桐. 四川盆地宁西地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气富集主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 99-110.
[6]	闫建平, 来思俣, 郭伟, 石学文, 廖茂杰, 唐洪明, 胡钦红, 黄毅. 页岩气井地质工程套管变形类型及影响因素研究进展[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 1-14.
[7]	孔令峰, 徐加放, 刘丁. 三塘湖盆地侏罗系西山窑组褐煤储层孔隙结构特征及脱水演化规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 15-24.
[8]	包汉勇, 赵帅, 张莉, 刘皓天. 川东红星地区中上二叠统页岩气勘探成果及方向展望[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 12-24.
[9]	申有义, 王凯峰, 唐书恒, 张松航, 郗兆栋, 杨晓东. 沁水盆地榆社—武乡区块二叠系煤系页岩储层地质建模及“甜点”预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 98-108.
[10]	邹连松, 徐文礼, 梁西文, 刘皓天, 周坤, 霍飞, 周林, 文华国. 川东地区下侏罗统自流井组东岳庙段泥页岩沉积特征及物质来源[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 122-135.
[11]	徐田录, 吴承美, 张金凤, 曹爱琼, 张腾. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组页岩油储层天然裂缝特征与压裂模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 35-43.
[12]	计玉冰, 郭冰如, 梅珏, 尹志军, 邹辰. 四川盆地南缘昭通示范区罗布向斜志留系龙马溪组页岩储层裂缝建模[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 137-145.
[13]	何文渊, 赵莹, 钟建华, 孙宁亮. 松辽盆地古龙凹陷白垩系青山口组页岩油储层中微米孔缝特征及油气意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 1-18.
[14]	程静, 闫建平, 宋东江, 廖茂杰, 郭伟, 丁明海, 罗光东, 刘延梅. 川南长宁地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气储层低电阻率响应特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 31-39.
[15]	邵威, 周道容, 李建青, 章诚诚, 刘桃. 下扬子逆冲推覆构造后缘凹陷油气富集关键要素及有利勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 61-71.