岩性油气藏 ›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5): 40–50.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20180505

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

酒西盆地老君庙构造白杨河组间泉子段储层孔隙结构特征

张世铭1,2, 张小军1,2, 郑联勇3, 王朴1,2, 苟迎春1,2, 吴梁宇1,2   

  1. 1. 中国石油勘探开发研究院 西北分院, 兰州 730020;
    2. 中国石油天然气集团公司油藏描述重点实验室, 兰州 730020;
    3. 中国石油玉门油田分公司 勘探开发研究院, 甘肃 酒泉 735200
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-23 修回日期:2018-03-05 出版日期:2018-09-14 发布日期:2018-09-14
  • 第一作者:张世铭(1986-),男,硕士,工程师,主要从事沉积储层方面的研究工作。地址:(730020)甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号。Email:Zhang_sm@petrochina.com.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重大科技专项“柴达木复杂构造区油气成藏、关键勘探技术与新领域目标优选”(编号:2016ZX05003-006)和中国石油重大科技专项“柴达木盆地建设千万吨油气田综合配套技术研究”(编号:2016E-0101)联合资助

Reservoir pore structures of Jianquanzi member in Laojunmiao structure,Jiuxi Basin

ZHANG Shiming1,2, ZHANG Xiaojun1,2, ZHENG Lianyong3, WANG Pu1,2, GOU Yingchun1,2, WU Liangyu1,2   

  1. 1. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development-Northwest, Lanzhou 730020, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Reservoir Description, CNPC, Lanzhou 730020, China;
    3. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Yumen Oilfield Company, Jiuquan 735200, Gansu, China
  • Received:2017-12-23 Revised:2018-03-05 Online:2018-09-14 Published:2018-09-14

摘要: 酒西盆地老君庙构造渐新统白杨河组间泉子段储层具有含水率高、驱油效率低的特点,明确储层孔隙结构特征成为提高油气采收率的关键。综合应用铸体薄片观察、扫描电镜分析、毛管压力测试等方法,对老君庙构造白杨河组间泉子段碎屑岩储层的孔隙结构特征及影响因素进行了研究。结果表明:储层岩性主要为岩屑砂岩和长石岩屑砂岩,具有岩屑含量高、成分成熟度和结构成熟度均低的特征;储集空间以残余粒间孔、粒间溶孔为主;按孔隙结构特征将储层分为4类,其中Ⅰ和Ⅱ类储层物性相对较好,渗透率均大于10 mD,毛管压力曲线有明显平台,偏粗歪度;孔隙结构特征参数中反映孔喉集中程度和粗喉道所占比例的参数与物性有较好的正相关关系;间泉子段L层为碱性成岩环境,粒间有较多的黏土矿物和方解石胶结物,局部胶结作用较弱的井段物性较好,M层酸性成岩环境抑制了胶结作用,使部分原生孔隙得以保存,同时酸性流体的溶蚀作用促进了M层优质储层的形成。研究结果可为油田后期有效开发提供地质依据。

关键词: 孔隙结构, 成岩作用, 间泉子段, 白杨河组, 酒西盆地

Abstract: Since the formation of Juanquanzi member in Laojunmiao structure has the features of high water cut and low displacement efficiency,the study of pore structure becomes the key to enhanced oil recovery. A variety of experimental test methods were used to study the pore structure and influencing factors of Paleogene Oligocene clastic reservoir in Juanquanzi member of Baiyanghe Formation,such as casting thin section observation,SEM analysis,capillary pressure testing and so on. The result shows that the reservoir lithologies are mainly lithic sandstone and feldspathic lithic sandstone,with high debris content,low maturity of composition and texture. Reservoir spaces are mainly residual intergranular pores and intergranular dissolved pores. The reservoirs can be divided into four types according to pore structure characteristics,and type Ⅰand type Ⅱhave relatively good reservoir property,with permeability above 10 mD. The capillary curves have significant platforms,and coarse skewness. There is a positive correlation between reservoir properties and the concentration of pore throat and the proportion of rough throat. The layer analysis shows that the layer L was in alkaline diagenetic environment,there were a large amounts of clay minerals and calcite cements contained in intergranular pores,and the well sections with weak cementation have good reservoir properties. The acid diagenetic environment of layer M inhibited the cementation,parts of primary pores were preserved,and the dissolution effect by acidic fluids promoted the formation of high quality reservoirs in M layer. The research results can provide geological basis for later effective exploitation.

Key words: pore structure, diagenesis, Jianquanzi member, Baiyanghe Formation, Jiuxi Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2
[1] 潘良云,谢结来,李明杰,等.酒泉盆地白垩纪-新生代区域构造演化与油气勘探.石油与天然气地质,2006,27(1):62-69. PAN L Y,XIE J L,LI M J,et al. Cretaceous Cenozoic regional tectonic evolution in Jiuquan Basin and petroleum exploration. Oil & Gas Geology,2006,27(1):62-69.
[2] 李伟,刘宝珺,吕涛,等.酒西盆地老君庙构造带油气来源的探讨.石油勘探与开发,2003,30(2):30-32. LI W,LIU B J,LYU T,et al. Oil and gas sources of Laojunmiao structural belt in Jiuxi Basin,Northwest China. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2003,30(2):30-32.
[3] 陈建平,陈建军,张立平,等.酒西盆地油气形成与勘探方向新认识(一)——基本石油地质条件及生油潜力.石油勘探与开发,2001,28(1):19-22. CHEN J P,CHEN J J,ZHANG L P,et al. New opinions on oil and gas generation and exploration in Jiuxi Basin(Ⅰ) Basic petroleum and geological condition and oil generating potential. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2001,28(1):19-22.
[4] 李铁峰,任明达.老君庙M层沉积特征及储层非均质性研究. 河北地质学院学报,1995,18(4):365-370. LI T F,REN M D. Research on the sedimentary characteristics and reservoir heterogeneity of M-layer of Laojunmiao oilfield. Hebei College of Geology,1995,18(4):365-370.
[5] 李克永,陈全红.酒西盆地老君庙油田古近纪L油藏富油因素分析.西安科技大学学报,2012,32(3):295-300. LI K Y,CHEN Q H. Enrichment of the Paleogene L reservoir in Laojunmiao oilfield of Jiuxi Basin. Journal of Xi'an University of Science and Technology,2012,32(3):295-300.
[6] 张闻亭,潘树新,刘震华,等.地震沉积学在坳陷湖盆滩坝砂体预测中的应用——以酒西盆地Y区块间泉子段为例.岩性油气藏,2016,28(6):109-116. ZHANG W T,PAN S X,LIU Z H,et al. Application of seismic sedimentology to prediction of beach and bar sand bodies in lacustrine basin:a case study of Jianquanzi member in Y block, Jiuxi Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs,2016,28(6):109-116.
[7] 喻宸,吴胜和,岳大力,等.细粒冲积扇沉积特征研究——以酒西盆地老君庙构造带古近系白杨河组为例.现代地质,2016, 30(3):643-654. YU C,WU S H,YUE D L,et al. Sedimentary characteristics of fine-grained alluvial fan:a case study of the Paleogene Baiyanghe Formation in Laojunmiao structural belt,Jiuxi Basin. Geoscience,2016,30(3):643-654.
[8] 秦国省,吴胜和,郑联勇,等.基于沉积过程的三角洲前缘河口坝储层构型精细分析——以老君庙油田L11小层为例.岩性油气藏,2015,27(6):55-63. QIN G S,WU S H,ZHENG L Y,et al. Detailed architecture analysis of mouth bar in delta front based on sedimentaryprocess:a case study of L11 layer in Laojunmiao Oilfield. Lithologic Reservoirs,2015,27(6):55-63.
[9] 王旭影,吴胜和,岳大力,等.基于定量成岩作用分析的成岩储集相研究——以老君庙油田古近系M油组为例. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2015,30(6):10-16. WANG X Y,WU S H,YUE D L,et al. Research of diagenetic reservoir facies based on quantitative analysis of diageneses:Taking Paleogene M Formation in Laojunmiao Oilfield as an example. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition),2015,30(6):10-16.
[10] 喻宸,吴胜和,郑联勇,等.老君庙油田古近系M层冲积扇低渗透储层特征及形成机理.高校地质学报,2015,21(4):747-757. YU C,WU S H,ZHENG L Y,et al. Reservoir characteristics and formation mechanism of M layer in the Paleogene low permeability and alluvial fan reservoir in the Laojunmiao Oilfield. Geological Journal of China Universities,2015,21(4):747-757.
[11] 王崇孝,马国福,周在华.酒泉盆地中、新生代构造演化及沉积充填特征.石油勘探与开发,2005,32(1):33-36. WANG C X,MA G F,ZHOU Z H. Structure evolution and sedimentary filling of Jiuquan Basin in Mesozoic-Cenozoic period, NW China. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2005,32(1):33-36.
[12] 陈居凯,朱炎铭,崔兆帮,等.川南龙马溪组页岩孔隙结构综合表征及其分形特征.岩性油气藏,2018,30(1):55-62. CHEN J K,ZHU Y M,CUI Z B,et al. Pore structure and fractal characteristics of Longmaxi shale in southern Sichuan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs,2018,30(1):55-62.
[13] 闫建平,梁强,耿斌,等.低渗透砂岩微孔特征与孔隙结构类型的关系——以东营凹陷南斜坡沙四段为例.岩性油气藏, 2017,29(3):18-26. YAN J P,LIANG Q,GENG B,et al. Relationship between micropore characteristics and pore structure of low permeability sandstone:a case of fourth member of Shahejie Formation in southern slope of Dongying Sag. Lithologic Reservoirs,2017,29(3):18-26.
[14] 郑荣才,郭春利,梁西文,等.四川盆地大安寨段非常规储层的储集空间类型与评价.岩性油气藏,2016,28(1):16-29. ZHENG R C,GUO C L,LIANG X W,et al. Characteristics and evaluation of reservoir spaces of shale gas(oil) in Da'anzhai member of Ziliujing Formation in Sichuan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs,2016,28(1):16-29.
[15] 庞振宇,孙卫,李进步,等.低渗透致密气藏微观孔隙结构及渗流特征研究:以苏里格气田苏48和苏120区块储层为例. 地质科技情报,2013,32(4):133-138. PANG Z Y,SUN W,LI J B,et al. Microscopic pore structure and seepage characteristics of low-permeability and tight sandstone gas reservoir:Taking blocks Su 48 and Su 120 in Sulige Gas Field as an example. Geological Science and Technology Information,2013,32(4):133-138.
[16] WARDLAW N C,TAYLOR R P. Mercury capillary pressure curves and the interpretation of pore structure and capillary behavior in reservoir rocks. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology,1976,24(2):225-262.
[17] 师调调,孙卫,何生平.低渗透储层微观孔隙结构与可动流体饱和度关系研究.地质科技情报,2012,31(4):81-85. SHI T T,SUN W,HE S P. Relationship between micro-pore structure and movablefluid saturation in low permeability reservoir. Geological Science and Technology Information,2012,31(4):81-85.
[18] 唐玮,唐仁骐.东河1油田退汞毛管压力曲线的分形特征.石油学报,2005,26(5):90-93. TANG W,TANG R Q. Fractal dimensions of mercury ejection capillary pressure curves in Donghe 1 oilfield. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2005,26(5):90-93.
[19] 龙翼,刘树根,宋金民,等.龙岗地区中三叠统雷四3亚段储层特征及控制因素.岩性油气藏,2016,28(6):36-44. LONG Y,LIU S G,SONG J M,et al. Reservoir characteristics and controlling factors of Middle Triassic T2L43 in Longgang area. Lithologic Reservoirs,2016,28(6):36-44.
[20] 游俊,郑浚茂.黄骅坳陷中北区深部储层物性影响因素分析. 现代地质,1999,13(3):350-354. YOU J,ZHENG J M. Factors of affecting the reservoir physical properties of deep strata in the Huanghua Depression. Geoscience,1999,13(3):350-354.
[21] 况晏,司马立强,瞿建华,等.致密砂砾岩储层孔隙结构影响因素及定量评价——以玛湖凹陷玛131井区三叠系百口泉组为例.岩性油气藏,2017,29(4):91-100. KUANG Y,SIMA L Q,QU J H,et al. Influencing factors and quantitative evaluation for pore structure in tight glutenite reservoirs:a case of the Triassic Baikouquan Formation in Ma 131 well field,Mahu Sag. Lithologic Reservoirs,2017,29(4):91-100.
[22] 吕成福,陈国俊,杜贵超,等.酒东坳陷营尔凹陷下白垩统储层孔隙特征及其影响因素研究.沉积学报,2010,28(3):556-562. LYU C F,CHEN G J,DU G C,et al. Characteristics of pore evolution and its controls of Lower Cretaceous reservoir in Ying'er Depression,Jiudong Basin. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2010,28(3):556-562.
[23] 祝海华,钟大康,姚泾利,等.碱性环境成岩作用及对储集层孔隙的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地长7段致密砂岩为例.石油勘探与开发,2015,42(1):51-59. ZHU H H,ZHONG D K,YAO J L,et al. Alkaline diagenesis and its effects on reservoir porosity:a case study of upper Triassic Chang 7 tight sandstones in Ordos Basin,NW China. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2015,42(1):51-59.
[24] 邱隆伟,姜在兴,操应长,等.泌阳凹陷碱性成岩作用及其对储层的影响.中国科学:D辑地球科学,2001,31(9):752-759. QIU L W,JIANG Z X,CAO Y C,et al. Alkaline diagenesis and its influence on a reservoir in the Biyang Depression. Science in China Series D Earth Sciences,2001,31(9):752-759.
[25] 查明,苏阳,高长海,等.致密储层储集空间特征及影响因素——以准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组为例.中国矿业大学学报,2017,46(1):85-95. ZHA M,SU Y,GAO C H,et al. Tight reservoir space characteristics and controlling factors:an example from Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag,Juggar Basin,northwest China. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,2017,46(1):85-95.
[26] 翁望飞,李争,季红军,等.阿尔及利亚A区块三叠系砂岩储层特征及其影响因素.天然气勘探与开发,2010,33(2):6-10. WENG W F,LI Z,JI H J,et al. Reservoir characteristics of Triassic sandstone and it's influencing factors,Algeria A block. Natural Gas Exploration and Development,2010,33(2):6-10.
[1] 孔令峰, 徐加放, 刘丁. 三塘湖盆地侏罗系西山窑组褐煤储层孔隙结构特征及脱水演化规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 15-24.
[2] 朱彪, 邹妞妞, 张大权, 杜威, 陈祎. 黔北凤冈地区下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩孔隙结构特征及油气地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 147-158.
[3] 李启晖, 任大忠, 甯波, 孙振, 李天, 万慈眩, 杨甫, 张世铭. 鄂尔多斯盆地神木地区侏罗系延安组煤层微观孔隙结构特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 76-88.
[4] 杨博伟, 石万忠, 张晓明, 徐笑丰, 刘俞佐, 白卢恒, 杨洋, 陈相霖. 黔南地区下石炭统打屋坝组页岩气储层孔隙结构特征及含气性评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 45-58.
[5] 李盛谦, 曾溅辉, 刘亚洲, 李淼, 焦盼盼. 东海盆地西湖凹陷孔雀亭地区古近系平湖组储层成岩作用及孔隙演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 49-61.
[6] 冯明友, 高瑞琪, 王兴志, 徐亮, 赵金, 刘小洪, 尚俊鑫. 川西南宝兴地区二叠系栖霞组一段白云岩储层充填序列及流体指示[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 11-20.
[7] 姚秀田, 王超, 闫森, 王明鹏, 李婉. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷新近系馆陶组储层敏感性[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 159-168.
[8] 肖玲, 陈曦, 雷宁, 易涛, 郭文杰. 鄂尔多斯盆地合水地区三叠系长7段页岩油储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 80-93.
[9] 曾治平, 柳忠泉, 赵乐强, 李艳丽, 王超, 高平. 准噶尔盆地西北缘哈山地区二叠系风城组页岩油储层特征及其控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(1): 25-35.
[10] 文志刚, 罗雨舒, 刘江艳, 赵春雨, 李士祥, 田伟超, 樊云鹏, 高和婷. 陇东地区三叠系长7段页岩油储层孔隙结构特征及成因机制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 47-59.
[11] 吕正祥, 廖哲渊, 李岳峰, 宋修章, 李响, 何文军, 黄立良, 卿元华. 玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组碱湖云质岩储层成岩作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(5): 26-37.
[12] 张凤奇, 李宜浓, 罗菊兰, 任小锋, 张兰馨, 张芥瑜. 鄂尔多斯盆地西部奥陶系乌拉力克组页岩微观孔隙结构特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(5): 50-62.
[13] 张记刚, 杜猛, 陈超, 秦明, 贾宁洪, 吕伟峰, 丁振华, 向勇. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组页岩储层孔隙结构定量表征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(4): 89-102.
[14] 程丹华, 焦霞蓉, 王建伟, 庄东志, 王政军, 江山. 黄骅坳陷南堡凹陷古近系沙一段页岩油储层特征及油气意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(3): 70-81.
[15] 雷海艳, 郭佩, 孟颖, 齐婧, 刘金, 张娟, 刘淼, 郑雨. 玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组页岩油储层孔隙结构及分类评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(3): 142-153.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨占龙, 张正刚, 陈启林, 郭精义,沙雪梅, 刘文粟. 利用地震信息评价陆相盆地岩性圈闭的关键点分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 57 -63 .
[2] 方朝合, 王义凤, 郑德温, 葛稚新. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系烃源岩显微组分分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 87 -90 .
[3] 林承焰, 谭丽娟, 于翠玲. 论油气分布的不均一性(Ⅰ)———非均质控油理论的由来[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 16 -21 .
[4] 王天琦, 王建功, 梁苏娟, 沙雪梅. 松辽盆地徐家围子地区葡萄花油层精细勘探[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 22 -27 .
[5] 王西文,石兰亭,雍学善,杨午阳. 地震波阻抗反演方法研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 80 -88 .
[6] 何宗斌,倪 静,伍 东,李 勇,刘丽琼,台怀忠. 根据双TE 测井确定含烃饱和度[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 89 -92 .
[7] 袁胜学,王 江. 吐哈盆地鄯勒地区浅层气层识别方法研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 111 -113 .
[8] 陈斐,魏登峰,余小雷,吴少波. 鄂尔多斯盆地盐定地区三叠系延长组长2 油层组沉积相研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 43 -47 .
[9] 徐云霞,王山山,杨帅. 利用沃尔什变换提高地震资料信噪比[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(3): 98 -100 .
[10] 李建明,史玲玲,汪立群,吴光大. 柴西南地区昆北断阶带基岩油藏储层特征分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(2): 20 -23 .