黄骅坳陷北大港潜山中生界碎屑岩储层特征及成因机理

doi:10.12108/yxyqc.20210209

岩性油气藏 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 81–92.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20210209

黄骅坳陷北大港潜山中生界碎屑岩储层特征及成因机理

李祖兵¹, 崔俊峰², 宋舜尧³, 成亚斌³, 卢异³, 陈岑¹

1. 复杂油气田勘探开发重庆市重点实验室, 重庆 401331;
2. 中国石油勘探开发研究院, 北京 100083;
3. 中国石油大港油田分公司勘探开发研究院, 天津 300280

收稿日期:2020-05-10 修回日期:2020-09-18 出版日期:2021-04-01 发布日期:2021-03-31
第一作者:李祖兵(1978—),男,博士,副教授,主要从事油气田储层地质及开发地质方面的教学与科研工作。地址:(401331)重庆市高新区重庆大学城重庆科技学院科研处。Email:lizubing708@163.com
通信作者: 崔俊峰(1970—),男,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事油气勘探综合研究工作。Email:yjy_cjf@petrochina.com.cn。
基金资助:
中国石油创新基金项目“深层火山岩优质储层成因机理研究”（编号：2013D-5006-0104）资助

Characteristics and genetic mechanism of Mesozoic clastic reservoirs in Beidagang buried hill,Huanghua Depression

LI Zubing¹, CUI Junfeng², SONG Shunyao³, CHENG Yabin³, LU Yi³, CHEN Cen¹

1. Chongqing Key Laboratory of Complex Oil and Gas Field Exploration and Development, Chongqing University of Science and Technology, Chongqing 401331, China;
2. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, Beijing 100083, China;
3. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Dagang Oilfield Company, Tianjin 300280, China

Received:2020-05-10 Revised:2020-09-18 Online:2021-04-01 Published:2021-03-31

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了弄清黄骅坳陷北大港潜山中生界碎屑岩储层的成因机理，综合应用目的层段的岩心、X射线衍射、铸体薄片、扫描电镜及测录井等资料，结合地层的埋藏演化史，系统分析了北大港地区中生界碎屑岩储层特征及成因机制。结果表明：①研究区中生界碎屑岩岩石类型较多，但以长石岩屑砂岩、岩屑石英砂岩和岩屑砂岩为主。②研究区中生界碎屑岩储层发育有原生孔隙、次生溶蚀孔隙和微裂缝等储集空间类型，但以次生溶蚀孔隙为主，原生孔隙和微裂缝所占比例较小；储层物性特征以低孔-低渗、低孔-特低渗为主，高孔-高渗储层段发育的比例较小，多数储层为低渗小孔喉储层。③储层发育受沉积、成岩和构造作用共同控制，成岩过程中的压实、胶结、溶蚀及油气充注对储层发育均有影响，其中溶蚀作用对储集空间发育的影响较大；从对储层发育的控制程度来看，岩石颗粒的分选性强于岩性，成岩压实作用强于胶结作用；构造作用形成的斜坡、不整合面及断裂不仅为溶蚀作用的发生提供了场所，也为溶蚀流体的流动提供了通道。该研究成果为黄骅坳陷北大港潜山地区有利勘探目标区的优选提供了地质依据。

关键词: 碎屑岩, 储层特征, 储层成因, 中生界, 北大港潜山, 黄骅坳陷

Abstract: The characteristics and genetic mechanism of Mesozoic clastic reservoirs in Beidagang buried hill, Huanghua Depression were systematically analyzed by combining the data of core,X-ray diffraction,casting thin section,scanning electron microscope and logging with the burial evolution history of the strata. The results show that:(1) There are many types of Mesozoic clastic rocks in the study area,but they are mainly feldspathic lithic sandstone,lithic quartz sandstone and lithic sandstone.(2) The Mesozoic clastic reservoirs in the study area are composed of primary pores,secondary dissolved pores and micro-fractures,dominated by secondary dissolved pores. The reservoir properties are characterized by low porosity and low to extra low permeability.(3) Reservoir development is influenced by sedimentary,diagenetic and tectonic processes. Compaction,cementation,dissolution and oil and gas charging in diagenetic process all have effects on reservoir development,among which dissolution has the greatest impact on the development of reservoir space. From the control degree of reservoir development,the sorting of rock particles is stronger than lithology,and compaction is stronger than cementation. The slope,unconformity surface and fault caused by tectonic action not only provide the place for the dissolution,but also provide channel for the flow of the dissolution fluid. The research results provide a geological basis for the optimization of favorable exploration target areas in Beidagang buried hill area of Huanghua Depression.

Key words: clastic rock, reservoir characteristics, reservoir genesis, Mesozoic, Beidagang buried hill, Huanghua Depression

中图分类号:

TE122.2

李祖兵, 崔俊峰, 宋舜尧, 成亚斌, 卢异, 陈岑. 黄骅坳陷北大港潜山中生界碎屑岩储层特征及成因机理[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 81–92.

LI Zubing, CUI Junfeng, SONG Shunyao, CHENG Yabin, LU Yi, CHEN Cen. Characteristics and genetic mechanism of Mesozoic clastic reservoirs in Beidagang buried hill,Huanghua Depression[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(2): 81–92.

参考文献

[1] 侯中帅, 陈世悦, 鄢继华, 等.大港探区上古生界沉积特征与控制因素.地球科学, 2017, 42(11):2055-2068. HOU Z S, CHEN S Y, YAN J H, et al. Sedimentary characteristics and control factors of Upper Paleozoic in Dagang exploration area. Earth Science, 2017, 42(11):2055-2068.
[2] 赵贤正, 周立宏, 肖敦清, 等. 歧口凹陷斜坡区油气成藏与勘探实践.石油学报, 2016, 37(增刊2):1-9. ZHAO X Z, ZHOU L H, XIAO D Q, et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation and exploration practice of slope area in Qikou Sag. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(Suppl 2):1-9.
[3] 付立新, 楼达, 李宏军, 等.印支-燕山运动对大港探区古潜山形成的控制作用.石油学报, 2016, 37(增刊2):19-30. FU L X, LOU D, LI H J, et al. Control effect of Indosinian-Yanshan movement on the formation of buried hill in Dagang exploration area. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(Suppl 2):19-30.
[4] 张晶, 李双文, 王书香, 等.歧南斜坡深层成岩演化与次生孔隙形成机制.中国矿业大学学报, 2014, 43(6):1070-1077. ZHANG J, LI S W, WANG S X, et al. Deep diagenetic evolution and formation mechanisms of secondary porosity in Qinnan ramp, Qikou Sag. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2014, 43(6):1070-1077.
[5] 陈长伟, 韩国猛, 马建英, 等.歧口凹陷板桥斜坡滨Ⅰ油组有利储集相带分析.特种油气藏, 2017, 24(1):49-52. CHEN C W, HAN G M, MA J Y, et al. Favorable reservoir facies analysis of Bin Ⅰ oil formation in Banqiao slope of Qikou Sag. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs, 2017, 24(1):49-52.
[6] 钟大康, 祝海华, 孙海涛, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区延长组砂岩成岩作用及孔隙演化.地学前缘, 2013, 20(2):61-68. ZHONG D K, ZHU H H, SUN H T, et al. Diagenesis and porosity evolution of sandstone in Longdong area, Ordos Basin. Earth Science Frontiers, 2013, 20(2):61-68.
[7] 钟大康.致密油储层微观特征及其形成机理:以鄂尔多斯盆地长6-长7段为例.石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(1):49-61. ZHONG D K. Micro-petrology, pore throat characteristics and genetic mechanism of tight oil reservoirs:a case from the 6th and 7th members of Triassic Yanchang Formation in the Ordos Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 2017, 38(1):49-61.
[8] 祝海华, 钟大康, 姚泾利, 等.碱性环境成岩作用及对储集层孔隙的影响:以鄂尔多斯盆地长7段致密砂岩为例.石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42(1):51-59. ZHU H H, ZHONG D K, YAO J L, et al. Alkaline diagenesis and its effects on reservoir porosity:a case study of Upper Triassic Chang 7 tight sandstones in Ordos Basin, NW China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(1):51-59.
[9] 沈安江, 赵文智, 胡安平, 等.海相碳酸盐岩储集层发育主控因素.石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42(5):545-554. SHEN A J, ZHAO W Z, HU A P, et al. Major factors controlling the development of marine carbonate reservoirs. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(5):545-554.
[10] 蒲秀刚, 周立宏, 王文革, 等.黄骅坳陷歧口凹陷斜坡区中深层碎屑岩储集层特征.石油勘探与开发, 2013, 40(1):36-48. PU X G, ZHOU L H, WANG W G, et al. Medium-deep clastic reservoirs in the slope area of Qikou Sag, Huanghua Depression, Bohai Bay Basin. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2013, 40(1):36-48.
[11] 王晓晨, 罗静兰, 李文厚, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地苏77、召51区块山₂³ 段储层成岩作用与孔隙演化定量分析.现代地质, 2017, 31(3):565-573. WANG X C, LUO J L, LI W H, et al. Diagenesis characteristics and quantitative analysis of porosity evolution of reservoir of Shan₂³ formation in Su77-Zhao51 well region, Ordos Basin. Geoscience, 2017, 31(3):565-573.
[12] 曲希玉, 陈修, 邱隆伟, 等.石英溶解型次生孔隙的成因及其对储层的影响:以大牛地气田上古生界致密砂岩储层为例. 石油与天然气地质, 2015, 36(5):804-813. QU X Y, CHEN X, QIU L W, et al. Genesis of secondary pore of quartz dissolution type and its influences on reservoir:Taking the tight sandstone reservoir in the Upper Paleozoic of Daniudi gas field as an example. Oil & Gas Geology, 2015, 36(5):804-813.
[13] 王艳忠, 操应长, 葸克来, 等.碎屑岩储层地质历史时期孔隙度演化恢复方法:以济阳坳陷东营凹陷沙河街组四段上亚段为例.石油学报, 2013, 34(6):1100-1111. WANG Y Z, CAO Y C, XI K L, et al. A recovery method for porosity evolution of clastic reservoirs with geological time:a case study from the upper submember of Es₄ in the Dongying Depression, Jiyang Subbasin. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(6):1100-1111.
[14] 郭艳琴, 何子琼, 郭彬程, 等.苏里格气田东南部盒8段致密砂岩储层特征及评价.岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(5):1-11.GUO Y Q, HE Z Q, GUO B C, et al. Reservoir characteristics and evaluation of tight sandstone of He 8 member in southeastern Sulige gas field, Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(5):1-11.
[15] 胡明毅, 沈娇, 胡蝶.西湖凹陷平湖构造带平湖组砂岩储层特征及其主控因素.石油与天然气地质, 2013, 34(2):185-191. HU M Y, SHEN J, HU D. Reservoir characteristics and its main controlling factors of the Pinghu Formation in Pinghu structural belt, Xihu Depression. Oil & Gas Geology, 2013, 34(2):185-191.
[16] 牛栓文, 李继岩.东营凹陷东段始新统红层储层多重成岩环境及演化模式.石油与天然气地质, 2014, 35(5):661-669. NIU S W, LI J Y. Multiple diagenetic environments and evolutionary patterns of the Eocene red beds in the eastern Dongying Sag. Oil & Gas Geology, 2014, 35(5):661-669.
[17] 吴林钢, 李秀生, 郭小波, 等.马朗凹陷芦草沟组页岩油储层成岩演化与溶蚀孔隙形成机制.中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 36(3):38-43. WU L G, LI X S, GUO X B, et al. Diagenetic evolution and formation mechanism of dissolved pore of shale oil reservoirs of Lucaogou Formation in Malang Sag. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science), 2012, 36(3):38-43.
[18] 周立宏, 于学敏, 姜文亚, 等.歧口凹陷异常压力对古近系烃源岩热演化的抑制作用及其意义.天然气地球科学, 2013, 24(6):1118-1124. ZHOU L H, YU X M, JIANG W Y, et al. Overpressure retardation of the thermal evolution of Paleogene source rocks and its significance for petroleum geology in Qikou Sag. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2013, 24(6):1118-1124.
[19] 朱正平, 袁淑琴, 王书香, 等.歧南地区坡折带特征及对沉积作用的控制.特种油气藏, 2014, 21(2):28-31. ZHU Z P, YUAN S Q, WANG S X, et al. Characteristics of the Shahejie Formation break zone in Qinan area and their control over deposition. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs, 2014, 21(2):28-31.
[20] 蒲秀刚, 周立宏, 韩文中, 等.歧口凹陷沙一下亚段斜坡区重力流沉积与致密油勘探.石油勘探与开发, 2014, 41(2):138-149. PU X G, ZHOU L H, HAN W Z, et al. Gravity flow sedimentation and tight oil exploration in lower first member of Shahejie Formation in slope area of Qikou Sag,Bohai Bay Basin. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(2):138-149.
[21] 赵贤正, 金凤鸣, 李玉帮, 等.断陷盆地斜坡带类型与油气运聚成藏机制.石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43(6):841-849. ZHAO X Z, JIN F M, LI Y B, et al. Slope belt types and hydrocarbon migration and accumulation mechanisms in rift basins. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43(6):841-849.
[22] 王爱国, 王震亮, 冷先刚, 等.柴北缘N1井储层的源控成岩演化与钙质夹层成因.中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 42(5):1-13. WANG A G, WANG Z L, LENG X G, et al. Source-rock-derived diagenetic evolution and origin of calcareous interlayer in reservoirs of well N1 in the northern Qaidam Basin. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science), 2018, 42(5):1-13.
[23] 廖朋, 王琪, 唐俊, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地环县-华池地区长8砂岩储层成岩作用及孔隙演化.中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 45(9):3200-3210. LIAO P, WANG Q, TANG J, et al. Diagenesis and porosity evolution of sandstones reservoir from Chang 8 of Yanchang Formation in Huanxian -Huachi region of ordos Basin. Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology), 2014, 45(9):3200-3210.
[24] 张志攀, 卢异, 付立新, 等.歧口凹陷古近纪坡折带特征及控沉作用.天然气地球科学, 2012, 23(2):284-290. ZHANG Z P, LU Y, FU L X, et al. Characteristics of Paleogene slop-breaks in Qikou Sag and its controlling effect on sedimentation. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2012, 23(2):284-290.
[25] 吴永平, 杨池银, 王华, 等.歧口凹陷构造-层序-沉积一体化研究及其应用.大地构造与成矿学, 2010, 34(4):451-460. WU Y P, YANG C Y, WANG H, et al. Integrated study of tectonics-sequence stratrigraphy-sedimentology in the Qikou Sag and its applications. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 2010, 34(4):451-460.
[26] 侯宇光, 何生, 王冰洁, 等.板桥凹陷构造坡折带对层序和沉积体系的控制.石油学报, 2010, 31(5):754-761. HOU Y G, HE S, WANG B J, et al. Constraints by tectonic slopebreak zones on sequences and depositional systems in the Banqiao Sag. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2010, 31(5):754-761.
[27] 周立宏, 蒲秀刚, 周建生, 等.黄骅坳陷歧口凹陷古近系坡折体系聚砂控藏机制分析. 石油实验地质, 2011, 33(4):371-377. ZHOU L H, PU X G, ZHOU J S, et al. Sand-gathering and reservoir-controlling mechanisms of Paleogene slope-break syetem in Qikou Sag,Huanghua Depression, Bohai Bay Basin. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2011, 33(4):371-377.
[28] 李强, 张革, 孙效东, 等.蒙古国塔木察格盆地塔南凹陷下白垩统铜钵庙组沉积特征和构造-古地理意义. 古地理学报, 2014, 16(6):897-906. LI Q, ZHANG G, SUN X D, et al. Sedimentary features and its tectono-palaeogeographic significance of the Lower Cretaceous Tongbomiao Formation in Tanan Sag, Tamtsag Basin, Mongolia. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2014, 16(6):897-906.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

黄骅坳陷北大港潜山中生界碎屑岩储层特征及成因机理

Characteristics and genetic mechanism of Mesozoic clastic reservoirs in Beidagang buried hill,Huanghua Depression

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	关蕴文, 苏思羽, 蒲仁海, 王启超, 闫肃杰, 张仲培, 陈硕, 梁东歌. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部旬宜地区古生界天然气成藏条件及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 77-88.
[2]	易珍丽, 石放, 尹太举, 李斌, 李猛, 刘柳, 王铸坤, 余烨. 塔里木盆地哈拉哈塘—哈得地区中生界物源转换及沉积充填响应[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 56-66.
[3]	周自强, 朱正平, 潘仁芳, 董於, 金吉能. 基于波形相控反演的致密砂岩储层模拟预测方法——以黄骅坳陷沧东凹陷南部古近系孔二段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 77-86.
[4]	申有义, 王凯峰, 唐书恒, 张松航, 郗兆栋, 杨晓东. 沁水盆地榆社—武乡区块二叠系煤系页岩储层地质建模及“甜点”预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 98-108.
[5]	张文播, 李亚, 杨田, 彭思桥, 蔡来星, 任启强. 四川盆地简阳地区二叠系火山碎屑岩储层特征与成岩演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 136-146.
[6]	何雁兵, 肖张波, 郑仰帝, 刘君毅, 易浩, 赵庆, 张月霞, 贺勇. 珠江口盆地陆丰13洼转换带中生界陆丰7-9潜山成藏特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 18-28.
[7]	杨润泽, 赵贤正, 刘海涛, 李宏军, 赵长毅, 蒲秀刚. 渤海湾盆地黄骅坳陷古生界源内和源下油气成藏特征及有利区预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 110-125.
[8]	江梦雅, 王江涛, 刘龙松, 李卉, 陈海龙, 蒋中发, 王学勇, 刘海磊. 准噶尔盆地盆1井西凹陷石炭系—二叠系天然气特征及成藏主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 138-151.
[9]	徐壮, 石万忠, 王任, 骆福嵩, 夏永涛, 覃硕, 张晓. 塔北隆起西部地区白垩系碎屑岩油气成藏规律及成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 31-46.
[10]	李承泽, 陈国俊, 田兵, 袁晓宇, 孙瑞, 苏龙. 珠江口盆地深层高温高压下的水岩作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(4): 141-149.
[11]	汪林波, 韩登林, 王晨晨, 袁瑞, 林伟, 张娟. 库车坳陷克深井区白垩系巴什基奇克组孔缝充填特征及流体来源[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(3): 49-59.
[12]	程丹华, 焦霞蓉, 王建伟, 庄东志, 王政军, 江山. 黄骅坳陷南堡凹陷古近系沙一段页岩油储层特征及油气意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(3): 70-81.
[13]	郭美洁, 时保宏, 董雄英, 李昊东, 何川. 黄骅坳陷埕海斜坡古近系油气成藏条件及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(3): 82-92.
[14]	崔俊, 毛建英, 陈登钱, 施奇, 李雅楠, 夏晓敏. 柴达木盆地西部地区古近系湖相碳酸盐岩储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(2): 45-53.
[15]	王永骁, 付斯一, 张成弓, 范萍. 鄂尔多斯盆地东部山西组2段致密砂岩储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(6): 12-20.